Linux-Networking Digest #851, Volume #9 Mon, 11 Jan 99 18:14:01 EST
Contents:
Re: Help! Ethernet problem II (still no clue) (Roger Hoeven)
Re: need some terminfo/telnet advice ("T.E.Dickey")
Re: Help with Ethernet card (Jason Lee)
Help with Ethernet card ("S. Asim Ali")
Re: Routing across multiple NICs ("Jeff Volckaert")
Re: Longshine Pocket LAN adapter (Matthew)
Re: e-mail system setup (Bruno Bertrand)
Re: Netgear FA310TX, new tulip.c, still doesn't work (David Kaczynski)
Re: How to set up a DNS ?? (Dale Pontius)
Drivers for Xircom Realport ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Sygate/Nat32 equivalent for linux (David Kaczynski)
Re: How to setup routing? ("Conrad Hagemans")
Wins Problem?? (Dan Falk)
need some terminfo/telnet advice (Max Jerome)
Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home (Miguel
Cruz)
Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have (Miguel Cruz)
ftp configuration problem ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!! (Miguel Cruz)
Routing problem with Redhat 5.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux & NE2k ISA card problem ("Mies")
need more help with 5.0 (John D Bogle)
Re: Problem in running apache (eric lund)
Re: eth0 IRQ conflict choices ("E.M. Janssen")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Roger Hoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help! Ethernet problem II (still no clue)
Date: 11 Jan 1999 21:09:53 GMT
Kyle, I'll try to help but I need some additional information:
To what kind of lan you want to connect to? 10 base-2 , 10 base T ?
Is your NIC configured for the right type of network??
What is the output of netstat -nr ?
rgds
roger
"Kyle J. Lee" wrote:
> This is what i get if type "ifconfig eth0":
> eth0 Link encpa:Ethernet HWaddr 00:08:C7:8C:AD:06
> inet addr: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Bcast: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Mask:
> 255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets: 1603 errors: 0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xff80
> NOTE: I replaced the actual IP address with xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>
> in my /etc/resolv.conf, i have the following entries
> search DOMAIN.NAME
> nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
> nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>
> i can ping myself without a problem however, i cannot ping any other
> machines whether it's in the same ethernet segment or not.
>
> i already spent a lot of time reading ethernet-howto and net3-howto but,
> i couldn't find anything.
>
> the nic is intel etherexpress with the chip# SB82558B.
>
> i would appreciate if someone can help.
>
> thanks!
>
> Kyle
>
> >I have installed Inter EtherExpress PCI nic in my system (redhat 5.0)
> >When the system boots up everything seems normal.
> >the card is recognized without a problem.
> >when i type ifconfig, i get lo and eth0 listings.
> >but, when i try to ping other machines in our lan, it fails.
> >using netcfg, i entered correct dns information, domain name, default
> >gateway, etc.
> >i cannot think of anything that may be causing this problem.
> >please help me!!!!
> >
> >Kyle
------------------------------
From: "T.E.Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: need some terminfo/telnet advice
Date: 11 Jan 1999 16:40:29 GMT
In comp.os.linux.misc Max Jerome <blah> wrote:
> hi all,
> I have been trying to get foxpro 2.6 for unix running under linux for
> medium sized multiuser app. I have made some real progress with the
> help of some nice people, but I have a few issues left to deal with.
> The main on is that if I telnet in, the screen does not clear/refresh
^^^^^^^^^ (from what type of terminal?)
> like it should. It was much worse before I got terminfo file from a
> guy that he edited it so it run foxpro correctly on the console. I
"console" on Linux is the "linux" terminal type. It usually isn't the
same as something that you would telnet in from (unless you are running
in the console on another Linux system).
> have tried several telnet programs and have found that net term shows
> everything else correctly and shows foxpro better than anything else.
> Does any body have any idea where to get a term info file that will
> work or know how to edit one? any help would be greatly appreciated
Terminfo for different terminal types differs (sometimes slightly,
sometimes a lot). If you know the terminal type you're using, you
can find the correct terminfo.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Lee)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Help with Ethernet card
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 19:31:48 GMT
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 11:52:21 -0500, "S. Asim Ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I bought a couple of encore Ethernet card. It works under windows nt but is
>not working under Redhat Linux 5.2 I have checked the FAQ for supported
>hardware and it is not listed in it. I am willing to buy a new one.. can
>someone suggest me which card/brand works well under linux?
3Com's work well, and I've had pretty good luck with LinkSys cards
(and they're a lot cheaper than 3Com ;).
Jason Lee | hold on if the truth be known
Programmer/Analyst - MEDTECH | truth is more than "to each his own"
(Remove ".no.spam" from the email address to reply)
------------------------------
From: "S. Asim Ali" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Help with Ethernet card
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 11:52:21 -0500
I bought a couple of encore Ethernet card. It works under windows nt but is
not working under Redhat Linux 5.2 I have checked the FAQ for supported
hardware and it is not listed in it. I am willing to buy a new one.. can
someone suggest me which card/brand works well under linux?
Thank you
Asim
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Volckaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Routing across multiple NICs
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 11:08:28 -0500
I believe setting the defaut route to eth1 will take care of this. No need
to even run routed or gated.
Just make sure your other boxes have the Linux box as the default gateway to
direct traffic at it.
Jeff Volckaert
Scott Swanson wrote in message <778o0m$nr4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello,
>
>I'm setting up my first Linux box running 5.2. My machine is configured
>with two network cards. eth0 is connected to my private network using
>192.168.0.254 all machines other machines on the private have
>192.168.0.x addresses as well. eth1 is connected to the internet via an
>ADSL connection and gets it's address via DHCP from my ISP. This is all
>working fine. However, my home network also has a gateway to the
>internet via another machine. I would like to configure my Linux box so
>that eth0 *only* allows packets addressed to 192.168.0.x machines onto
>that network and all other packets go out onto the internet via eth1.
>I'm sure this is explained in one of the HowTos, but I couldn't find
>it... I'd appreciate it if anyone could show me the proper route
>commands I'll need to accomplish this routing.
>
>Thanks,
>
> -Scott
>
>
------------------------------
From: Matthew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Longshine Pocket LAN adapter
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 16:47:27 +0000
Is this the Longshine PCMCIA NE2000 compatible adapter (I can't check the
number on mine - i'm currently using it...)?
I just plugged it in and rebooted - the PCMCIA software in the kernel (or
wherever else) detected it and I could then use ifconfig up eth0 fine.
Matthew
On Tue, 1 Dec 1998, Don Milne wrote:
>Has anyone used this NIC (LCS-8834PM) with LINUX
>I don't seen to be able to find a driver to work with it on any
>distribution.
>
>Many thanks in anticipation
>
>Don
------------------------------
From: Bruno Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: e-mail system setup
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 23:08:22 +0100
On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Chrispy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I work in a small company (only 5 of us) and we currently have an e-mail
> account with an ISP here in the UK that allows unlimited addresses. I would
> like to set up a Linux machine to retreive all the mail from this account
> and put it into individual mailboxes for retreival in our office. Similarly,
> anyone in the office sending mail should be able to do this through the
> Linux box using a client (such as Netscape Mail or Outlook Express) on their
> own PC.
I've just done this configuration 2 months ago. All you need is a RedHat
or, prefered for server services, a Slakware 3.6+ distribution.
Install the Slackware with sendmail using STMP support (not UUCP).
Read a few HOW-TO about sendmail, /etc/sendmail.cf, and the '-q' option.
Configure local users (adduser and other nice things).
Configure the PPP connection (pppsetup).
Use the 'fetchmail' program to retreive mail from pop3 servers to your own
linux box.
My linux box works on a P200 with 32Mo of RAM and a 4Go hard disk (3Go
are shared for MS-Win workstations using samba). You will 'only' need a
486 or Pxxx with a 525Mo and 32Mo of ram to do only an e-mail gateway.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Kaczynski)
Subject: Re: Netgear FA310TX, new tulip.c, still doesn't work
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 17:20:13 GMT
Reply-To: /dev/null
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 11:30:47 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'm trying to get a second nic working. The first, eth0, is a 3com 905 that
>works just fine on RH 5.1.
>
>I installed the second card (pci) and, based on past discussions in this
>newsgroup, compiled and installed the new tulip.c driver that was on the disk
>that came with the card.
>
>I added: alias eth1 tulip to my /etc/conf.modules file, reboot, and it doesn't
>work.
>
>It doesn't show up when I 'ifconfig'. Trying to configure yields:
>
>[root@bear /sbin]# ifconfig eth1 192.168.93.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
>SIOCSIFADDR: Operation not supported by device
>SIOCSIFNETMASK: Operation not supported by device
>[root@bear /sbin]#
I had the exact error. Check (on boot-up) that some other device
(probably the serial controller on IRQ 5) isn't using the IRQ that the
FA310TX is. If it is, manually assign the nic card an unused IRQ and
see if that works.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dale Pontius)
Subject: Re: How to set up a DNS ??
Date: 11 Jan 1999 21:28:54 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heinzl) writes:
> A primary, secondary, internal primary or a caching only ? ... for the
> last one see ...
> ...
What does a caching nameserver do when I'm offline, and it gets a
request which it doesn't have cached? How does this change when I
start home networking?
More to the point, are there any basic tutorials on DNS and BIND
to set one up for the home/dialup user? Even more to the point,
is this something that the home/dialup user shouldn't even do?
The documentation available from www.isc.org is oriented to more
'industrial-grade' usage.
This reminds me of wading through the Bat-Book trying to get
sendmail to queue without DNS lookup delays (got that) and to
get full userid/domain translation. (didn't get that)
Dale Pontius
(NOT speaking for IBM)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Drivers for Xircom Realport
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 21:15:26 GMT
Does anyone know of a driver for a Xircom Realport CardBus 10/100
PCMCIA card? I've got one in my Toshiba Techra 8000 and Linux
can't see it.
Thanks
Greg
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Kaczynski)
Subject: Re: Sygate/Nat32 equivalent for linux
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 17:24:41 GMT
Reply-To: /dev/null
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:58:43 -0500, "Jeff Volckaert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>With redhat 5.x you don't need to recompile the kernel unless you need
>ipautofw (which is needed for games and conferencing). Just install redhat
>and run the ipfwadm commands.
>
>Jeff Volckaert
With RedHat v5.2, the default is to NOT allow IP forwarding, so make
sure you edit "/etc/sysconfig/network" to correct this.
------------------------------
From: "Conrad Hagemans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to setup routing?
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:49:37 +0100
Jeff Volckaert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:77d5ic$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>Where is your default route? Try "route add default ppp0" if you want your
>Net traffic to go out the dial up. Switch ppp0 for eth0 if you want Net
>traffic to go out the firewall.
>
>You firewall is probably blocking incoming Net stuff for your own good.
You
>should be able to telnet to the ppp0 address though.
Yes i can telnet to ppp0 over the internet
I cannot see why the firewall is blocking this trafic, if you look at the
ipfwadm listing.
>
>Can you telnet to eth1?
No i cannot reach the eth1 device over the internet. eth1 has on
non-official ip address. It's an internal-network device.
I cannot reach eth0 either.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 12:23:37 -0500
From: Dan Falk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Wins Problem??
I am trying to run a linux (RH5.2) server as a Wins resolution. The
problem is that when I set the WinXX machines to use the Samba
(1.9.18p10) server for Wins and reboot the win9X machines, the Wins
resolution becomes disabled on the Win9X machines. Also, is there
anything I need to do to setup linux as a Wins server other than adding
'wins support = yes' in the smb.conf? Is there any way to tell if
computers are using linux's Wins resolution? Could anybody point me to
some info on Wins resolution other than samba's man pages?
Thanks in advance,
Dan Falk
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Max Jerome )
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: need some terminfo/telnet advice
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 16:25:17 GMT
hi all,
I have been trying to get foxpro 2.6 for unix running under linux for
medium sized multiuser app. I have made some real progress with the
help of some nice people, but I have a few issues left to deal with.
The main on is that if I telnet in, the screen does not clear/refresh
like it should. It was much worse before I got terminfo file from a
guy that he edited it so it run foxpro correctly on the console. I
have tried several telnet programs and have found that net term shows
everything else correctly and shows foxpro better than anything else.
Does any body have any idea where to get a term info file that will
work or know how to edit one? any help would be greatly appreciated
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have Cox@home
Date: 11 Jan 1999 17:27:28 GMT
Shane Bearham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a question or two to ponder...... which you DON'T have to answer of coarse.
>Q. How much does it cost for your net connection per month ???????
>Q. How much do you pay for Data/Phone charges
Those are very Australian questions. Our friend here is connecting through
@home; huge bandwidth at a flat rate of about $40/month. No phone charges at
all.
miguel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Want to do direct install of Redhat 5.2 via FTP since I have
Date: 11 Jan 1999 17:30:53 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SORRY MAN
> BUT I DON'T PAY S*** FOR AN OPERATING SYSTEM THAT IS FREE AND CHANGES WITHIN A FEW
>MONTHS !!!
> SO THROW YOURSELF OUT AND GET LOST !!!
Even though it changes all the time, you really only have to pay the two
dollars once. After you have it working, you can easily update online. The
CD is just to get you started the first time. It really will make your life
easier. If the two dollars is a problem, give me your address and I'll order
it for you.
miguel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,uk.comp.ol.linux
Subject: ftp configuration problem ?
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:07:44 GMT
Hello,
I am new to Linux. I have just installed, Red Hat 5.1.
It is very stable !
Now, I have created a little local network, 3 pcs:
1 192.168.0.1 Linux on it
2 192.168.0.2 W 95
3 192.168.0.3 W 95
I have ftp, telnet and apache running. Apache works great. I have a problem
with both ftp and telnet. If I type the command "ftp localhost", or ftp
192.168.0.1 from the Linux terminal itself, (samething with telnet) everything
is fine, but if I do it from one of the W 95 machines, I instantly receive a
message saying connected, but then it looks like "hang" for 1 or 2 minutes,
until I see a welcome screen. If I try, WS_fgp95, for example, I never get
connected.
Does anybody have any idea of what is happening ?
Thank you very much,
Daniel Fernandez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Montevideo,
Uruguay
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Cruz)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.install,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP !!! PLEASE HELP !!!
Date: 11 Jan 1999 17:38:39 GMT
David Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whilst this obnoxious person has been winding everyone up, there has
> been mention of what his ISP would think of his antics. Assuming he uses
> an ISP.
Notice that he uses "drg" as his user name. This is the same as that used by
Dr John Grubor, one of the internet's most famous kooks. All of which
suggests to me it's just a silly troll.
miguel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Routing problem with Redhat 5.2
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:08:47 GMT
No matter what I try, I cannot get my machine to route packets
between the two ethernet interfaces. Hosts on both networks and other
networks can be pinged from my Linux machine. I have recompiled the
kernel for firewalling and have issued appropriate ipfwadm commands from
/sbin. I am not masquerading or proxying. My routing table appears to
accurately reflect the network configuration. I cannot ping the
ethernet "internet" card of my Linux machine from the "local" network.
Here is what my test network, basically, looks like;
internet
^
|
_______|________
| eth0 |
| a.b.c.155 |gateway=a.b.c.254 (default)
|----------------|
| eth1 |
| 192.168.48.155 |
|________________|gateway=a.b.c.155
|
|
|
_______^________
| eth0 |
| 192.168.48.154 |
|________________|gateway=192.168.48.155
Routing Table
=================================
|a.b.c.0 |0.0.0.0| eth0 |
|192.168.48.0|0.0.0.0| eth1 |
|127.0.0.0 |0.0.0.0| lo |
|0.0.0.0 |a.b.c.254| eth0|
=================================
The sole purpose of this Linux-based machine is to run as a firewall.
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
R O B E R T
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Mies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux & NE2k ISA card problem
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 19:44:22 +0200
Eh, a ISA PNP card?
Switch off the PNP, then you might get a positive surprise :)
You should have some kind of utility for dos which can disable PNP (came
with your card probably)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] kirjoitti viestissä <77bmlb$gdu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello,
>
>I have been having problems with Red Hat 5.2 and a NE2000 ISA network card.
>I have had NO problems with this card and NT. Linux didn't find that card
at
>first so I went in an added it to conf.modules Now Linux finds it and it
>will work for no more than a minute. I have run tests where right after
boot
>I start pinging one of my other machines and after about 30 returns
nothing.
>I have also pinged from the other machine to this problem machine and after
>about 30 seconds I get the time out message.
>
>I have read the help section at Red Hat and see there have been reports of
>TCP/IP packets failing to be transfer. Has anyone had this problem and
over
>come it?
>
>Thanks
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John D Bogle)
Subject: need more help with 5.0
Date: 11 Jan 1999 22:27:39 GMT
i still have been having trouble getting my linux
computer to ping my nt machine but when i ping my own card to attemp to
check my tcp/ip setup it sends me a resonse with zero packet loss.
my
linux computer has a ne2000 16bit ISA NIC installed .
i advised to run ipconfig /all in nt and ifconfig et0 in linux.
the result was:
Windows NT IP Configuration
Host Name . . . . . . . . . : al_arab.aswad
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . : 199.234.240.5
129.250.252.10
Node Type . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
NetBIOS Scope ID. . . . . . :
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . : No
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . : No
NetBIOS Resolution Uses DNS : Yes
Ethernet adapter DC21X41:
Description . . . . . . . . : DEC DC21041 PCI Ethernet Adapter
Physical Address. . . . . . : 00-00-C0-54-B3-F5
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . : 192.14.123.3
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . :
Primary WINS Server . . . . : 192.14.123.1
Ethernet adapter NdisWan4:
Description . . . . . . . . : NdisWan Adapter
Physical Address. . . . . . : 00-01-10-B6-07-FF
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
IP Address. . . . . . . . . : 199.234.243.153
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . : 199.234.243.153
I cannot get either computer to ping the other.
can someone help?
------------------------------
From: eric lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problem in running apache
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 09:29:43 +1100
go to the httpd.conf file and put the the URL that you want your server
to generate there. eg www.xyz.com.hk
you may then go to control-panel network setup and add a New Host giving
it an IP address.
Alternatively, put localhost.localdomain at ServerName just to get
things started without the error message.
el
Ntfs wrote:
> When I excute "apachectl start". The following
> error message is given out
>
> "httpd: cannot determine local host name.
> use the ServerName directive to set it manually.
> ./apacheckl start httpd could not........"
>
> Can anyone help me?????
> Also, can anyone tell me how to set "netcfg"??????
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 18:59:22 +0100
From: "E.M. Janssen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: eth0 IRQ conflict choices
Hello
Look at this posting in this newsgroup..
Subject: Solution problem setting up homenetwork.
Dat: Wed, 06 Jan 1999 15:12:55 +0100
It shows what I have done.
Hope it helps for you as well.
Martijn
Janssen
Netherlands
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am running RedHat 5.0, and I am trying to configure for a 3com Etherlink III
> ISA 3c509B-TPO. I was able to re-compile the kernel and modules and make LILO
> happy, but I have a conflict on IRQ 10 with my SCSI card.
>
> As I understand things I have two major choices:
>
> 1. Make a windoze boot disk, and run the utilites to disable PNP, then
> configure the card manually to avoid the conflict.
>
> 2. Upgrade the 3c509.c program to the latest version which supports the:
> ether= ... command as a LILO instruction.
>
> I am inclined to take choice #2, and I have gotten the new source for the
> driver, but I don't know how to make LILO swallow the ether= syntax. Where
> does this go? Do I need to upgrade LILO, or other parts of the OS for this
> to work right? Should I just cave in to cowardly choice #1?
>
> I am seeking guidance on this... any ideas?
>
> Thanks,
> Kurt
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
To reply remove "NoSpam." from email address.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
