Linux-Networking Digest #890, Volume #9 Fri, 15 Jan 99 18:13:39 EST
Contents:
Minimal BOOT installation for ethernetcard. (Juergen Berger)
Re: SMC EtherEZ 8416 driver anyone? (Eric Jorgensen)
How to assign a IP address range to an interface ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: RedHat 5.2/NIS/netgroups (Thorsten Kukuk)
Re: DHCPD reports Network not reachable ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Network Connection Monitor ("Jacques")
60 % OFF Retail on Quality Watches - Distributor and Sample Order Avaiable
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Can you wildcard in the /etc/hosts file? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Please HELP - packets are not forwarded ("Stu")
Arcserve Agent on Linux (Jason Baeder)
Re: What Linux distibutions have SNMP agents and daemons bundled? ("Lewis Foti")
Re: Configuring PPP server for IPX ("Stu")
Re: email problem. (Andrzej Filip)
Re: easy easy easy one ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Security hole with WU-FTPD (Daryle Niedermayer)
How to increase eth0 buffer with Ether Express 10/100 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
[Q] 3c905B TX using DHCP (Chang Cheng Chao)
Re: IPv6 (Richard Hyde)
Re: Setting up @Home (Andrew Marcum)
begginer need help please (Jnb27)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Juergen Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Minimal BOOT installation for ethernetcard.
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:07:34 GMT
> Hello,
>
> I have put an ethernet-card (NE2000) in a PC. On this PC no OS is
> istalled. Now I want to create a BOOT-disk, that it is possible to
> boot
> from this
> disk (is not the problem) and than connecting the PC to the LAN and
> copy files from the server.
> Which files are needed on the BOOT disk ?
Juergen Berger
------------------------------
From: Eric Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SMC EtherEZ 8416 driver anyone?
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:07:35 GMT
nospam wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I'm having a really hard time finding a driver for my SMC EtherEZ board,
> based on the SMC 8416 chip. Anyone know where I might find one? Or
> does anyone know of a place to start looking? I did some web searching,
> but to no avail. My Red Hat 5.2 distribution didn't come with a driver
> for it :(
Are you the same guy that I've been talking to already?
The EtherEZ has an SMC Ultra compatibility mode. Use the dos utility on
the driver floppy to reconfigure the board, and put it in that mode. Use
the SMC Ultra driver.
- Eric
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to assign a IP address range to an interface ?
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 10:21:24 GMT
Hi,
I need to recompile my 2.1.117 kernel and assign a range of ip address to an
interface. How can I do that ? What's the kernel hack ?
Example: eth0: 10.0.0.1 to 10.0.0.254
Thank you to answer me also by email
==============
Thomas Parvais
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Thorsten Kukuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RedHat 5.2/NIS/netgroups
Date: 14 Jan 1999 09:27:47 GMT
Hello,
Ariel Biener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are running a heterogenous cluster of NIS clients, with 3 NIS servers
> (one master, two slaves).
> Recently, we have added a Linux based machine, 2.0.36 kernel,
> glibc-2.0.7-29, and all the ypbind/clients from the 5.2 distribution.
> Unfortunately, we haven't been able to figure out how to make netgroup based
> authentication work. I have read through all the threads ever posted about this
> subject to UseNet, and have been through all the manual pages, DOCs and FAQs
> on the subject, and also posted a Question to Thomas Kukuk and also to the
> Israeli Linux Community, but to no avail.
My name is Thorsten, not Thomas ;-)
Sorry that I haven't answerd, I have lost some mail by my move to a new city.
This is a FAQ and I should add it to the NIS-Howto. Or even better, RedHat should
fix it. Change your PAM configuration to use NOT use pam_pwdb, but pam_unix_auth.
Read the Section in the NIS-Howto about PAM, NIS+ and login about that.
> This is the situation:
> We have tried different /etc/nsswitch.conf configurations, using either:
> passwd: files compat
> group: files compat
Use only compat, not files. Read man nsswitch
> passwd_compat: nis
> group_compat: nis
> netgroup: nis
This is correct.
> We have changed the PAM authentication modules to the *_unix based ones,
> because the pwdb one doesn't look at nsswitch.conf nor does it work with NIS.
> I have checked the sources of glibc-2.0.7-29 to seek the error that existed
> in previous versions, where:
> encrypted == NULL was mistyped as encrypted != NULL . But glibc-2.0.7-29 is
> fixed.
> In any case, /etc/passwd wont deal with netgroups at all. I can add
> +user or -user, but +@netgroup doesn't work.
If +user works, but not +@netgroup, you haven't removed pam_pwdb from all places.
This is a typcally pam_pwdb problem.
> Does anyone have a working solution, that allows the use of +@netgroups or
> -@netgroups , in order to have a selective authentication method to the
> NIS client in question ?
Does all 3 netgroup maps exists and readable ? I hope you doesn't use
shadow over NIS ? And haven't configured ypserv to use port auth ?
Thorsten
--
Thorsten Kukuk [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.pages.de/~kukuk/
SuSE GmbH Tel: +49-911-74053-197 Fax: +49-911-7417755
Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DHCPD reports Network not reachable
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 21:04:50 GMT
You also have to add a route (because of the "picky Microsoft DHCP client").
If your Network card is eth0, it would be:
route add -host 255.255.255.255 eth0
In RedHat, I recomend adding that line to your /etc/rc.d/rc.local file.
peace favor your sword
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam Redding) wrote:
> If you use DHCP with Microsoft Clients, you have to include:
> option broadcast-address 192.168.1.255?
> See: http://www.linuxhq.com/HOWTO/mini/DHCP-4.html
>
> Sam Redding.
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a problem. I try to set up DHCP on my network by installing dhcpd on
my
> > linux box (RH 5.2). I configured dhcpd for 1 subnet (192.168.1.0 netmask
> > 255.255.255.0) and specified one range (see dhcpd.conf below:)
> >
> > subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> > option domain-name "cartoon.nl";
> > option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.1;
> > option routers 192.168.1.1;
> > range 192.168.1.10 192.168.1.200;
> > default-lease-time 259200;
> > }
> >
> > [dhcpd.conf]
> >
> > When I start dhcpd with the -d option, I get the following output:
> >
> > [root@silvester /etc]# dhcpd -d
> > Internet Software Consortium DHCPD $Name: V2-BETA-1-PATCHLEVEL-6 $
> > Copyright 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998 The Internet Software Consortium.
> > All rights reserved.
> > Listening on Socket/eth0/192.168.1.0
> > Sending on Socket/eth0/192.168.1.0
> > DHCPDISCOVER from 00:10:4b:e1:76:ec via eth0
> > DHCPOFFER on 192.168.1.10 to 00:10:4b:e1:76:ec via eth0
> > sendpkt: Network is unreachable
> > DHCPDISCOVER from 00:10:4b:e1:76:ec via eth0
> > DHCPOFFER on 192.168.1.10 to 00:10:4b:e1:76:ec via eth0
> > sendpkt: Network is unreachable
> >
> >
> > I can ping and do all other TCP/IP stuff on my network if I use static IP's,
> > so I guess my network card is working properly. I'll include my kernel route
> > information table below:
> >
> > [root@silvester /etc]# route
> > Kernel IP routing table
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
> > sun4000.casema. * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 2 ppp0
> > 192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 6 eth0
> > 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 4 lo
> > default sun4000.casema. 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 59 ppp0
> >
> > Does anybody know what the solution to my problem could be? Any help is
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Greetz
> > Floris Jan
> >
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Jacques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Network Connection Monitor
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 22:09:25 +0100
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE=====
Hash: SHA1
netstat -a will give you a complete list.
Jacques
Haaino Beljaars wrote in message ...
>Hi,
>
>I am searching for a grafical program that displays a list of all
TCP/IP
>connections to my and from my machine. I have a RH 5.2 system. If
there is
>no such program, can anybody tell em how to monitor TCP/IP
connections?
>
>Greetings from Haaino Beljaars
>
>E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Home Page: HTTP://www.phys.uu.nl/~beljaars/
>
=====BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE=====
Version: PGP 5.5.5
iQA/AwUBNp+gdSUN+LwDkOunEQK8UwCghE5/1OhDIv/VxNKViqzk3bhRHaQAn3rs
6HyCnteDTNLm7HQ8sGWKzuYy
=VSFN
=====END PGP SIGNATURE=====
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 60 % OFF Retail on Quality Watches - Distributor and Sample Order Avaiable
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 03:47:35 PST
Seeking Distributor WORLDWIDE and Sample Orders Avaiable on our UNIDIN
high grade watches made with SWISS ETA 2834-2 calibers ( movements) , 60%
OFF retail price is offered directly from our FACTORY. Five years factory warranty
on all watches we sell to you , we even cover your shipping for repairing on our
durable watches. We are very serious on your order directly from our factory and
be our distibutor WORLDWIDE.
We are a member of NAWCC
See more detail on http://www.unidin.pyar.com
Sincerely yours,
Wayne
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can you wildcard in the /etc/hosts file?
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 21:09:57 GMT
I have a network consisting of two NT boxes and two Linix boxes (one Debian,
and the other LRP). I do not have a DNS setup, I connect to the Linix boxes
by specifying their IP addresses.
My problem is that I can only FTP or Telnet to these boxes if the computer I'm
trying to connect with is listed in the /etc/hosts file. (IE, if an NT box is
192.168.1.4, this needs to be in the Linix boxes' /etc/hosts files).
So I'm wondering how I can connect to the linix box without specifying my
entire network in the /etc/hosts file. Is it possible to wildcard it? I'd
really like to avoid setting up a DNS if I can.
Also, how would I go about allowing any computer on any network to connect to
one of the linix boxes?
Thanks,
Aaron
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Stu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Please HELP - packets are not forwarded
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 16:21:23 -0500
Ummm, I haven't done this in a long time, but you don't use the routing
table to make masquerading work.
You use the ipfwdadm utility, although I know they've changed the name of
it, and I don't know what it's called now. It's like ipchains or something
like that.
When you figure out what ipfwdadm/ipchains commands to use, you put them
somewhere in your rc.* files, probably near the networking stuff, after the
interface is initialized. Then you don't have to do it at boot up each time.
Sorry to be so vague, but It's been a long time since I did this myself.
Tony Cuevas wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Packets are not forwared by my linux box out to the net
>or to my lan.
>From my linux box (the router) I can ping out to the
>net and I can ping each of my machines on the private
>lan. Machines on the lan can ping x.y.z.35 but they can't ping
>x.y.z.34 (or anything outside the network addr for that matter).
>Can someone please help me figure out what am I doing wrong???
>
>I'm running RH5.2 on an alpha. Recompiled the kernel to include
>firewalling and ipforwarding.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:47:23 -0500
From: Jason Baeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Arcserve Agent on Linux
I am using the the Arcserve agent on Linux to backup to a tape drive on
an NT server running Arcserve 6.0. Backup and restore works quite fine.
There are two small quirks though.
1) After backup, full verification works. But CRC verification fails.
I've tried it both ways.
Not a big deal, but I'm interested to know why.
2) Also, I sometimes get the following error messages when backup the
Linux server:
AE9110 Unknown filter type - 5
I'm pretty sure I configured uagent properly:
uag.cntl specifies
/proc
/dev
/home
so those directories are not backed up
There's nothing in uag.conf because the defaults were acceptable; and I
couldn't find
anything in fs.cntl that was relevant.
Cheyenne has no information on this error message.
It still backs up, but I'm left wondering.
TIA for any info.
**********************************************
Jason Baeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Director, IS http://www.chindex.com
Chindex International
------------------------------
From: "Lewis Foti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What Linux distibutions have SNMP agents and daemons bundled?
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:49:08 -0000
RedHat 5.2 ships with an snmp daemon called (not surprisingly) snmpd and a
simple snmp retriever called snmpget.
Christopher Smiga wrote in message ...
>My company has been asked to monitor and perform remote LAN administration
>on many Linux boxes.
<snip>
>Q1.) Does anyone know what distributions of Linux have SNMP agents and
>daemons bundled with them?
<snip>
------------------------------
From: "Stu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Configuring PPP server for IPX
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 16:33:01 -0500
I don't know much, but while I'm here, I thought I'd throw in my two cents.
IPX isn't routable. So you have to run IPX on some routable protocol (like
ip)
Novell is moving towards this from what I hear, maybe version 5 has it
already, I dunno.
Since samba runs like windows for workgroups over IP, you can thereby route
ms networking packets this way. I've heard that it's been done, never did it
myself. Kinda neat, that you can mount samba drives over a modem.
Anyway, perhaps think about NFS? Can you NFS export Novell drives? That
would solve your problem as well, no?
Victor Sturgeon wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello all.
>
>I'm trying to setup a linux box to provide PPP dialup access to a TCP/IP
>and IPX network. Basically I want the client to establish a PPP
>connection and be able to see both the TCPIP network and the Novell IPX
>Network.
------------------------------
From: Andrzej Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: email problem.
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:07:35 GMT
"Johannes T�ger" wrote:
> when i send a mail to root@localhost, it works.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not.
> root@johannes (linked to 10.0.0.101=my comp. in /etc/hosts) works
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] does not work.
> what the hell is wrong???
> i am running slackware 3.5.
try
root@[127.0.0.1]
and
root@[10.0.0.101]
Warning: not all email servers are willing to accept email
addresses in such form.
It is better ti use DNS FQDN (Fully qualified domain name)
e.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Andrzej Filip
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: easy easy easy one
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 21:20:01 GMT
Josh Rusko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: ya mean where it shows up in netword neighborhood? That wouldn't be your
: domain name, it would be your workgroup name in samba.conf (smb.conf? I forget
: the name and I'm in windoze now).
Change the line that says
workgroup = default
Set it to whatever domain you want it to use and restart Samba.
------------------------------
From: Daryle Niedermayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.security,comp.security.unix,redhat.general,redhat.networking.general,aus.computers.linux
Subject: Security hole with WU-FTPD
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 16:19:39 -0600
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============0A537D09DFDE5AF1123A5B34
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
We had a hacker exploit a weakness in the WU-FTP daemon last night. The
exploit on a machine named "bob" from a machine named "neale"went like
this:
Here's how part of the exploit happened:
By adding an entry to the bottom of the passwd file:
test::0:0:dummyname:/:/bin/bash
without a password marker, our login scripts will not let you login with
a
shell, but they will let you open an ftp connection with root
permissions.
You can then upload or download any file you want. ftp will allow you to
login with a null password so you do not need access to the shadow file
to
exploit this weakness, as the following transcript will show:
neale[29]% ftp bob
Connected to bob....
220 bob... FTP server (Version wu-2.4.2-academ[BETA-15](1) Sat Nov
1 03:08:32 EST 1997) ready.
Name (bob:dniederm): test
331 Password required for test.
Password:
230 User test logged in.
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> cd /etc/
250 CWD command successful.
ftp> get shadow
local: shadow remote: shadow
200 PORT command successful.
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for shadow (1117 bytes).
226 Transfer complete.
1117 bytes received in 0.00159 secs (6.8e+02 Kbytes/sec)
ftp> bye
221 Goodbye.
neale[30]% whoami
dniederm
neale[31]% more shadow
...
the contents of the shadow file including encrypted passwords would
follow.
The fact that the shadow file is not root writable. Would not have saved
it. Once root access is gained in this way, putting the shadow file back
raises not problems with overwriting a file with 0400 permissions.
Upgrading to BETA-18 (the latest available rpm still permitted this
exploit. The software was installed as part of the default set of rpms
in a Redhat Linux 5.0 distribution.
We are still working to uncover how the hacker managed to append a
passwd entry to the /etc/passwd file. (I'm open to suggestions--at the
time of the attack, bob was set up to be an NFS client but we do not use
NFS in our domain as so it may not have been configured properly. NFS
has since been removed).
We have since replaced wu-ftp with a different ftp server. Here again I
am open to suggestions as to the best low-cost (or no-cost) ftpd
available apart from wu-ftp.
--
********************************
Daryle Niedermayer
Programmer/Analyst
GDS & Associates Systems. Ltd.
400 - 4211 Albert St.
Regina, SK Canada -- S4S 3R6
Phone: 306.586.7832
Fax: 306.585.1514
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gds.ca
********************************
==============0A537D09DFDE5AF1123A5B34
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="dniederm.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Daryle Niedermayer
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="dniederm.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Niedermayer;Daryle
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:GDS & Associates Systems Ltd.
adr:;;400 - 4211 Albert St.;Regina;SK;S4S 3R6;Canada
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Programmer/Analyst
tel;fax:306.585.1514
tel;work:306.586.7832
x-mozilla-cpt:;63424
fn:Daryle Niedermayer
end:vcard
==============0A537D09DFDE5AF1123A5B34==
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to increase eth0 buffer with Ether Express 10/100
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 21:49:52 GMT
I have a Linux box working as an IP masquerading server and router for about
200 people. We are now having a problem with the network card buffer being
too small.
How do I increase the buffer size for the network card? I am running Red Hat
5.0, kernel 2.0.32, Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100 @ 100Bt, directly into a
switch.
-Pete
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Chang Cheng Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Q] 3c905B TX using DHCP
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:16:39 -0800
I had been unsucessfully trying to get this card working under Red Hat 5.2
for a week now. The card is detected at boot time but I just could not
connect to any place. When I do a telnet, it complains about Host Name
Lookup failed. I know it has to do with the DNS servers so I put in
nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.x
nameserver xxx.xxx.xxx.x
entries into resolv.conf After that when I do a telnet or trying to
connect to Internet, it will wait for maybe a minute before complaining
Host Name Lookup failed. Any ideas what might be wrong?
Another question. What exactly is DHCP and do I have to specify name
servers, routes, gateway and IP information when I'm using DHCP?
Does anyone out there knows any site that has the newest pre-compiled
module, 3c59x.o, for RH 5.2. I tried to compile 3c59x.c myself but hey
it gives a few compiling errors. Thanks in advance.
Chang
------------------------------
From: Richard Hyde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPv6
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 14:56:51 -0800
Alexander Brinkman wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know how much progress is being made with the IPv6
> protocol. Are there yet companies using it? Is it already being deployed
> by (major) ISPs?
>
> Maybe somebody has an URL for IPv6 related news?
>
> Grtz,
> Eon.
>
> --
> My mail is powered by Linux!
IPv6 as far as I know is only used in research networks right now.
Commercial intrests will definatly not be able to join in on the 6bone
for now (or maybe forever). Check out www.6bone.net for more info.
Richard "Trey" Hyde
------------------------------
From: Andrew Marcum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Setting up @Home
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 21:58:43 GMT
Here are two web sites. The first deals with cable modems in gerneral and the
second is for connecting to @home in linux.
Hope they are useful.
Andrew Marcum
http://www.cablemodemhelp.com/
http://www.monmouth.com/~jay/Linux/
Stephen O'Connell wrote:
> *** Sorry second post, not sure if first made it through ***
>
> I am running Caldera V1.2 at home and am considering subscribing to @Home.
> @Home is provided by TCI in my area and they do not support Linux as an OS.
> Also they "require" that you purchase the 10baseT card from them. I
> currently have all the machines in my house attached on a 10MB Lan(2 hubs),
> (1) linux, (2) Win 95, and (1) Win98. I am sharing an ISDN line connected
> to a Win95 machine across this configuration using WinGate.
>
> I would like to share @Home across my Lan and am wondering how best to do
> this. Ideally I would attach the cable modem to a second 10baseT card,
> which I already own, on my Linux machine.
>
> Is this configuration possible? What will I need on the Linux machine to
> make this work? Can someone point me towards a mini- on @Home and/or Cable
> Modems, setup/config info?
>
> Thanks so much for any assistance. Stephen....
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jnb27)
Subject: begginer need help please
Date: 15 Jan 1999 22:59:26 GMT
i just installed linux (redhat) on my P90 32megs , my main goal is to use linux
sharred folders from my nt server 4..is that be possible??
can someone help me to configure this one...
joey
email address
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
