Linux-Networking Digest #938, Volume #9 Tue, 19 Jan 99 09:14:00 EST
Contents:
Re: modem hangs with 56K USR external on RH5.2 Please help!! (Hendra Susanto)
Network Unreachable !! (John King)
Re: getting the remote IP address in a telnet session (Josh Rusko)
Re: module net-pf-4 errors (Mark Lesswing)
Re: Benchmark Software ("Tommi M�kitalo")
ppp numbering--control? ("Timothy Chu")
Re: IP Tunneling (Megavolt)
diald routing problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
A little newbie help... seeing Win95 shares in Linux (Brian Newman)
Re: 3c503 and Linux / Win95 networking trouble ("Kyle Bowerman")
How to install a RTL8139 network card ("Frank Dijcks")
ping on multiple interfaces (Douglas De Vine)
Re: Netbios routing over two segments (Rickey Ingrassia)
Re: Long pauses on bootup/reboot. (Mark Roberts)
Re: Hi, ("Jan Stifter")
Re: wu ftpd and memory caching... (Brian McCauley)
Losing IP packets? (Jeffery Cann)
Re: How to set sendmail (peter)
Re: Connect without hub ("Guy A. Wadsworth")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Hendra Susanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modem hangs with 56K USR external on RH5.2 Please help!!
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 18:34:00 +0800
Clifford Kite wrote:
> Ravi Iyengar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> : hi:
>
> : I am trying to get my PPP conn set up on my RH5.2 (2.0.36) and my modem
> : seems to hang when it reaches the 'OK-+++\c-OK' part of my dialer
> : script. I am using the dialer script as in the PPP HOWTO document.
> : The same thing happens when I use minicom too (I dunno where it hangs
> : in this case).
> : I am using an external modem and my serial port looks fine. I dont have
> : any conflicts (I/O port or IRQ). And the modem is not a winmodem.
> : I have a static IP from my ISP.
> : My /var/log/messages just says that my connect script failed.
> : The bizarre thing is when I run ppp-on, sometimes the modem doesnt dial
> : the specified number. It omits one or two numbers. I have never seen
> : this before.!!!!!
>
> I don't understand, does the modem hang as in your first paragraph and
> then eventually dial?
>
> It still sounds like an IRQ problem anyway. The IRQ that the modem
> uses must be configured properly by setserial somewhere in the /etc/rc.*
> scripts. In Slackware it's /etc/rc.d/rc.serial, for RH I don't know.
>
> A look in /var/log/messages should tell you whether I'm right. If the
> number is eventually dialed, then look at the time between when the
> OK-+++\c-OK is sent and the time that the OK actually appears. More than
> one second delay can mean little else except an IRQ problem.
>
> --
> Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
> /* Editing with vi is a lot better than using a huge swiss army knife. */
No problem with my Sportster 56K Voice Modem, except no voice feature in
Linux.
------------------------------
From: John King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Network Unreachable !!
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 22:15:12 -0500
Hi Folks,
My organisation has a couple unix/linux servers
accessing the internet using Instant Internet. Our
Network is a Novell 3.12 100 user LAN. My users
access internet e mail to and from the server via
Eudora. Recently users indicated they were not
receiving e mail, I checked and found the
server/linux box giving the network unreachable
error msg. The card is a novell anthem nic. I
changed it for a good card and see that the
connection is a good one as the light on the hub
is green. The system boots up but hangs after the
memory test is complete (486 DEC system).
Apologies for the length of this msg. Question -
was the IP address embedded/burned into the old
card ? Why is the system not seeming to recognise
the new card ? How do I tell the system to assign
the IP address of the server to the new card or am
I totally barking up the wrong tree ??
Any suggestions/ideas would be greatly
appreciated.
Pls respond if possible to me at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John (Orlando, FL)
------------------------------
From: Josh Rusko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: getting the remote IP address in a telnet session
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 16:44:06 -0500
thanks a lot!
(although I did have to change the grep version to
who | sed -ne "s/$USER.*(\(.*\))/\1/p"
or it would only work with my username but it's all good...)
thankya
Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> > is there a way to find out what IP address a telnet connection is coming
> > from? well I know there IS a way because I have a shell account on Grex
> > and when I connect it says "Last connected from 123.123.123.123"...
> > I want to put a line in /etc/profile that will find the remote IP
> > address (or localhost if the user is at the console), so then I can do
> > things like
> > DISPLAY="$REMOTE_IP":0.0
> > or whatever
> > does anyone have a clue how to do this?
> >
> >
> The 'who' command gives a table of users...
>
> [username] [tty] [login date] [login from]
> jrusko ttyp3 Jan 17 16:02 (remotehost.yahoo.com)
>
> Inspecting the output, I found that the [login from] column is the only
> one separated from the other columns by a tab (at least, on my host).
>
> So something like
> who | grep jrusko | cut -f2
> yields
> (remotehost.yahoo.com)
> which isn't quite what's needed.
>
> This command sequence
> who | sed -ne 's/jrusko.*(\(.*\))/\1/p'
> yields
> remotehost.yahoo.com
> which is much better.
>
> So something like
> REMOTE_HOST=`who | sed -ne 's/jrusko.*(\(.*\))/\1/p'`
> DISPLAY=$REMOTE_HOST:0.0
> should work for you.
>
> You'll need to customize the sed script to parse the output of the who
> command if it differs from the output on my machine.
>
> If your system has 'who am i', then you could simplify the above to
> REMOTE_HOST=`who am i | sed -ne 's/.*(\(.*\))/\1/p'`
> DISPLAY=$REMOTE_HOST:0.0
> which will run faster (maybe inperceptibly) on systems with lots of users
> (lots of lines of output from who).
>
> You could do this with perl (a better language than sed's, IMHO) but sed
> loads much faster than perl and this is a really simple use of regular
> expressions.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> --
> Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Mark Lesswing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: module net-pf-4 errors
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 22:02:45 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This happened to me when I recompiled my kernel and took out both appletalk
and ipx support. To get around it, I added the following two lines to ny
/etc/conf.modules file:
alias net-pf-4 off
alias net-pf-5 off
John Strange wrote:
> Well, try
> man modprobe
> and verify that modprobe -c
> will dump the name of the modules; (I am unsure of the -c)
> It will give the module names for the net-pf-*.
>
> So if net-pf-4 IPX was displayed it would indicate
> IPX was not compiled as a module.
>
> If you installed the kernel source, you could try
> cd /usr/src/linux
> make xconfig
> click on network and see what was selected.
>
> Luca Colombi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> : I receive the following error messages during boot up.
>
> : modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-4
> : modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
>
> : Does anybody know what that means ?
>
> : --
> : Luca Colombi
> : System Administrator
> : The Hub Communications Co. Ltd.
> : The Farmhouse
> : Syon Park
> : Middlesex
> : TW8 8JF
>
> : Tel: +44(0)181 560 9222 Fax: +44(0)181 560 9333
> : E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] URL: http://www.thehub.co.uk
>
> --
> While Alcatel may claim ownership of all my ideas (on or off the job),
> Alcatel does not claim any responsibility for them. Warranty expired when u
> opened this article and I will not be responsible for its contents or use.
------------------------------
From: "Tommi M�kitalo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Benchmark Software
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 09:03:44 +0100
For Disk I/O you can use Bonnie (http://ftp.sunet.se/pub/benchmark/Bonnie).
For Web server performance there is a program called 'ab' in the
apache-distribution.
------------------------------
From: "Timothy Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp numbering--control?
Date: 19 Jan 1999 02:55:49 GMT
Is there a way to control what my ppp connections are numbered? I
currently have 2 ppp connections--a dial-up isp connection and a serial
cable ppp connection. At this point, they're arbitrarily numbered based
on which pppd command is run first. I want to force the modem dial-ip
connection to be ppp0, and the serial connection to be ppp1. Is there a
way?
--
,,*,,,,,______/|___,i__/~~, ,. ,.' To reply remove the 's' in my
o \` / ` email address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o / ))) --_\ Vancouver, British Columbia
<tim>< ~~~\|----~~\ \ http://www.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca/spider/v8k1
------------------------------
From: Megavolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Tunneling
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 06:39:00 GMT
Try out CIPE... it is encrypted tunneling with much better documentation :)
http://sites.inka.de/sites/bigred/devel/cipe.html
Noone wrote:
> Greetings!
>
> Here's an excellent challenge....I have two LINUX boxes set up as firewalls
> to my network. We are switching over to NT with Exchange as our email
> server.
>
> What I want to do is set it up so that my NT box is behind the firewall but
> taht POP3 clients can access their email. My solution is to set up IP
> Tunneling between my NT box and my Linux box.
>
> Has anyone ever done this? Does anyone know where I can get more
> information? I have consulted the /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/README.tunnel
> file. It is kinda cryptic though.
>
> Thanks for any help!
>
> Patty Calcaterra
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"If all else fails, you can blame it on me..." - Barenaked Ladies
To respond to my Email take out the antispam message
in my reply address --> "isnot"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diald routing problems
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 06:35:42 GMT
I've been looking for answers to my diald problems but haven't
found any. So here's my post.
diald (version 0.16.5) dials out when I try and contact somebody, but
the routing does not look correct. I am using RedHat 5.2.
When I connect by hand and look at the route I get this (works):
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
204.50.109.5 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 5 lo
default 204.50.109.5 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 7 ppp0
When diald is running I get this (does not work):
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
news.intergate. * 255.255.255.255 UH 1 0 1 sl0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 5 lo
default * 0.0.0.0 U 1 0 1 sl0
This is my /etc/diald.conf file:
#
debug 20
mode ppp
accounting-log /var/log/diald.log
#fifo /etc/diald/diald.ctl
#connect /usr/sbin/usernetctl ifcfg-ppp1 up
connect /etc/diald/connect.intergate
device /dev/modem
speed 115200
modem
lock
crtscts
local 127.0.0.2
netmask 255.255.255.0
remote 127.0.0.3
dynamic
addroute /etc/diald/addroute
defaultroute
include /usr/lib/diald/standard.filter
The script '/etc/diald/addroute' is presented with the local and
remote values that I have specified. I thought it was supposed to
get the 'real' values that are assigned dynamically by my ISP?
Thanks for any help.
Michael Lum ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Brian Newman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: A little newbie help... seeing Win95 shares in Linux
Date: 18 Jan 1999 14:48:05 -0800
I have a Win95 box and a Linux box ethernetted together. I have Samba up and
running on Linux and I can share the Samba shares from Win95 with no problem.
When I try to access one of the shares on the Win95 box from the Linux box, I
get a message that RPC can't make a connection.
This is when trying "mount -t nfs win95box:/c /mnt/win95box/c". Is that right?
I've tried "smbclient \\win95box\c" in just about every syntax I can and
smbclient always tells me there aren't enough "\" in the parameter. How many do
I need to put in and where?
I checked out "man rpc", which tells me to run "rpc client foo bar" to engage
the RPC client. Okay, but... the executable "rpc" is in my /sbin/init.d
directory, and its only options are "rpc start" and "rpc stop", and it doesn't
seem to help.
Any hints?
====================
Shade and sweet water,
Brian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.aracnet.com/~bnewman
"A small bullet, a piece of glass /
And your heart just grows around it" -- Laurie Anderson, "Poison"
------------------------------
From: "Kyle Bowerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3c503 and Linux / Win95 networking trouble
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 20:22:42 -0700
Is the MTU on the linux box set to 1500?
Kyle
SuprMath wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have my linux computer (486DX, 50Mhz, 12Mb RAM, 2.5G harddrive, 3Com
3c503
>net card, kernel 2.0.34) networked to my windows 95 computer (Pentium 2,
>300Mhz, 64 Mb RAM, 8G hardrive, 3Com 3c503 net card). I have modified the
>appropriate hosts files, and pinging between the computers works fine. I
can
>telnet into the Linux box, and retrieve web pages from the Linux box (using
the
>Apache server). I can retrieve files from the Linux box to the Windows 95
>computer with FTP, but whenever I try and transmit a file over a certain
size
>to the Linux box, the connection freezes. The file size seems to be
somewhere
>between 15Kb and 30Kb. My FTP software gives me these errors:
>
>Send error: Connection reset!
>Transmitted 9216 bytes in 173.6 secs, (531.00 bps), transfer failed
>Recieve error: Blocking call canceled!
>
>That's it. The connection is still active but nothing works anymore.
Also,
>when both computers were running Windows 95, the 486 box (the one that is
>currently running Linux) could see the Pentium 2, but the Pentium 2 could
not
>see the 486.
>
>Anyway, I'm starting to go insane here, so any help would be appreciated.
>
>=Brian
------------------------------
From: "Frank Dijcks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to install a RTL8139 network card
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 23:58:58 +0100
I am trying to install a 100 Mbps network card on Linux 2.0.34 RedHat 5.1.
It is a RTL8139 based card and I am using the rtl8139 module.
At first I used the original driver from the card (it was supplied!), but
there was an error message about the wrong Linux version number. So I
downloaded the latest driver from gsfc.nasa.gov and manage to compile it
(wow! and that for a newbie).
The version message is now replaced by another error:
SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource temporarily unavailable
The LED on the hub is off and network card is not shown with ifconfig.
However it looks like the card was detected, because dmesg shows:
eth1: RealTek RTL8139 Fast Ethernet at 0xf880, IRQ 10,
00:4f:4e:01:53:1b.
The DOS setup program shows the same port / IRQ / MACaddress.
(eth0 is a 3Com 3c900 10 Mbps network card.)
What is wrong here and how can I fix it?
Frank Dijcks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Douglas De Vine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ping on multiple interfaces
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 13:37:58 +1000
How can I ping out of multiple interfaces on a linux box?
------------------------------
From: Rickey Ingrassia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Netbios routing over two segments
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 23:58:03 GMT
Freerk,
You should only need IP routing turned on on the router, no NetBIOS
specifics. However, you need some way to resolve NetBOIS names across
the router. An LMHost file, a NetBIOS proxy agent or a WINS. The hosts
on each subnet are probably using subnet(local) broadcasts to resolve
names on there respective subnet. The router is most likely terminating
these broadcasts which is why each PC can not see across the router.
Freerk Jongsma wrote:
>
> I have on my Linux box two segments.
> each on a ethernet card, 192.168.3.x and 192.168.0.x
> Almost all users use win9x
> Users on each segment can see ech other on 'networking neigborhood' or
> in the tree by 'exploring'.
> As you know it is done with netbios over tcp/ip
> Unfortunately the users from x.x.3.x do not see users from x.x.0.x
> I have to route netbios over both networkcards. Samba does not fix
> everything for me (as I first thought)
> Does anyone of you know how to fix this?
>
> Freerk Jongsma
--
Regards,
Rickey
========
"Let distance be no barrier!" Vinton Cerf
------------------------------
From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Long pauses on bootup/reboot.
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 11:11:44 +0000
I believe the problem may be that your system comes to a halt when it
performs name lookups. Your system is either resolving names incorrectly
or you have the hostname and domain name of your machine setup
incorrectly.
This quite often happens if you change the domain name of your machine
and do not update all the relevant files.
If your computer is also acting as a nameserver, you need to check the
nameserver files too - these are:
/etc/hosts
/etc/resolv.conf
/etc/named.conf or named.boot
All files in /var/named/
I'm in the process of building a Linux Server guide at
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/maroberts/linux/guide/index.html
It's still incomplete though, and the DNS section is very sketchy.
You're welcome to read it and see if you can see what's wrong.
Digital Wokan wrote:
>
> Seems like RH 5.1 keeps stopping for several minutes every time it tries
> to start 'amd', 'sendmail', and 'smb' (if there are more, I haven't been
> patient enough to reach them). Can anyone suggest to me why my system
> (K5-133) would take so long to start those?
> --
> Digital Wokan, Tribal Mage of the Electronics Age
> Commanding Officer, Quake clan: N.A.V.Y.
> Assistant webmaster, Baldur's Gate Guild: The Shadow Runners
> http://members.xoom.com/wokan/
> ICQ: 4168945 AOL-IM: DWokan
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GCS d-(+) s-:+ a- C++++ UL>++$ P+ L+>++$ E--->+ W++(+++)>$ N++
> o? K++ w++@ !O M- V-- PS+>++ PE Y+>++ PGP t+ 5 X+ R++ tv+ b+
> DI++ D++ G e+* h r++ y++*
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
------------------------------
From: "Jan Stifter" <j.stifter@[no-spam]usa.net>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux,comp.security.unix,comp.unix.bsd.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security,comp.security.firewalls,comp.security.misc
Subject: Re: Hi,
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:15:46 +0100
>How can i test my system myselve..
>I have one computer that is not behind the fire wall so i can hack
>myselve in my own system-computer to test the fire wall.
>A am lurning a lot but it is not easy, never told it was easy...
>For me it is a project to get it running wihout problems, i was
>managing ok sofar, until mister hacker came along.
>
>I tried to get some programs. But most of the time hard to get..
>
>Does anyone have some programs or links to programs that test ports,
>sniff, maybe test ipspoofing problems, programs running on a port i
>forgot about... Just a program that looks for holes...
>
>Does something like that exist?
>What do you recomend...
>Maybe you can send it to me...
you may want to take a look at SATAN: System Administrator Tool for
Analyzing Network
>By the way is there a way to stop a hacker trieing?
analyze your logs and find out, from where he is coming, then call the
sysadm from the source. if it is always the same ip, close this ip for some
time...
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: wu ftpd and memory caching...
Date: 19 Jan 1999 13:07:37 +0000
"Kid Velvet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have recently setup a Linux RH5.2 server through an ADSL connection. I
> setup IP masquerading OK, and all of the services seem to be functioning
> just fine...but there are a couple of problems.
Note: for the sake of people searching these newsgroups it's better to
post unrelated questions in spareate messages with suitable subject
lines.
> First, when someone uses the FTP site, over 50MB of the 64MB on the system
> get cached during a download. This leaves the machines on the local LAN
> with very little memory to perform other tasks through the Linux
> box.
This is a varient of a FAQ. It is a good idea to skim read the entire
FAQ (or at least the questions) before posting to any newsgroup for
the first time.
Clean cache _is_ available for other tasks.
> Is there a way to flush the cache once the user is done?
Yes, do something else.
> TOP shows the memory being cached even when the in.ftpd process has
> stopped.
Perfectly normal, see FAQ.
> Better yet, is there a way to limit the caching used for the FTP
> server?
No. There is probably no reason to wish to do so.
> Second, I am using apache for my web site. I am able to connect to my
> website via the Internet, but the /~username after my site says that I am
> not able to connect to the server.
If you specify /~username the server will automatically redirect you
to /~username/. It will use its own name in the redirect URL. If
it's idea of its own name is not correct you'll get the above error.
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: Jeffery Cann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Losing IP packets?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 06:20:19 -0700
Hello.
I have a simple 2 station ethernet hub, connected via cross-over cable.
Box 1 192.168.0.1
Box 2 192.168.0.2
I can ping both stations from each other but either way will show packet
loss as shown below (22%) and the round trip is up to 3000 ms, which
seems way too slow. Note that for these tests, I used IP addresses, not
host aliases.
I cannot telnet or ftp between stations because it will time out. Is
this a hardware problem or configuration problem or some other problem?
Suggestions are appreciated
Jeff
--- 192.168.0.2 ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.1/833.5/3000.2 ms
PING 192.168.0.2 (192.168.0.2): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=2991.1 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=2000.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.2 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=2000.3 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1000.3 ms
--- 192.168.0.2 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 22% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.1/1141.7/2991.1 ms
--
"Who does not trust enough will not be trusted."
- Lao Tsu
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (peter)
Subject: Re: How to set sendmail
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 12:32:28 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
> I have two machine connect together via Ethernet.
> One is NT Server, second is Redhat Linux. I 've installed
> RAS on NT sever for remote users to login on NT and to
> Linux by Telnet. Those Internet server, Ftp sevice work
> fine. But I can not hide Linux host name for mail service.
> So, we have to use our email address as
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> instead of <linuxuser@linuxdomain>
>
> I have consult with Sendmail config try to add
> virtual user table as
> "@linuxdomin [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> but it does not work.
> How to I resolve this problem ? (In most easyway,
> I am new to Linux)
>
I am also new to linux and there is no easy way to describe sendmail ;)
you might need the masquerading-feature.
host_masquerading and/or user_masquerading.
look at http://www.harker.com/webgencf/
which will help you create your sendmail.mc
peter
=================
pilsl@
ANTISPAM
riemann.atat.at
------------------------------
From: "Guy A. Wadsworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.win95
Subject: Re: Connect without hub
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 08:37:57 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > > Rob Wiltbank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > No, a hub is designed to to take packets and distribute them as best as
> > > > is can to their destination. You're more likely to have packets collide
> > > > on a peer to peer than through a hub.
Just a quick comment here. Please be careful in quoting. Absolutely
nothing of what was quoted here was written by me. Thanks.
Guy.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
