Linux-Networking Digest #949, Volume #9 Wed, 20 Jan 99 08:13:54 EST
Contents:
Benchmark ("Denis Titho")
TCP wrappers busted my mountd? ("David J. Topper")
Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (Matthew Kirkwood)
Re: Disappearing Default IP Route (Dieter Hackl)
nameserver problem (Dieter Hackl)
Re: Netgear FA310TX, new tulip.c, still doesn't work (Troutman)
Sendmail is running, so why the download error? ("minstrel")
eth and ppp settings deactivate sometimes, help ("Scott MacDonald")
Re: Long pauses on bootup/reboot. (Matt Kressel)
3C905B-TX (Paul Hardiman)
Re: User quota (Jayasuthan [VorHacker])
PCI FAST Ethernet DEC 21143 Based Adapter ("Travis Lower")
Re: ATT worldnet ??? PPP (Ken Oster)
Re: DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
device or resource busy (Klaus Leopold)
Re: Connect without hub ("Guy A. Wadsworth")
Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD (Villy Kruse)
Re: S: MB86965 Ethernetcontroller-Driver (Russell Nelson)
hostname (none) (Samuel Adams)
Re: DOES LINUX SUCK (mlw)
Re: DOES LINUX SUCK ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Recommendations for an External ISDN Modem? (Mark Cooperstein)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Denis Titho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Benchmark
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:00:27 +0100
Hi!
I've to test the performance in a LAN with let's say 100 workstations.
So the question is: How can I test this - are there any tools available?
The tool should tell me about:
min/average/max transferred KB/S
min/average/max time until a response arrives
...
Of course it would be really nice if the tool could simulate 10/25/50
"typical" users...
Yeah, I know the description above isn't real concrete but please make
suggestions anyway. Thanks.
cu,
Denis
PS: Please answer also to my pm-adress ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: "David J. Topper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TCP wrappers busted my mountd?
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 22:07:37 GMT
Hey folks,
I just set up a MOSTLY CLOSED tcp wrapper schema. Now my machines can't
mount? But I thought mountd had nothing to do with wrappers. Besides
that, I have all the machines that need to talk to each other defined in
/etc/hosts.allow.
I CAN telnet between all the machines.
?
Thanks,
Dave Topper
--
Technical Director, Virginia Center for Computer Music
Programmer / Analyst, Dean's Office (School of A&S)
http://www.panix.com/~topper
(804) 924-6887
------------------------------
From: Matthew Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix,redhat.networking.general,aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 11:21:19 +0000
On 20 Jan 1999, Villy Kruse wrote:
> >I have seen this happen before. In my case the hacker first broke into an NT
> >machine (has microsoft ever made a product that was secure? ;-) ) then used
> >SAMBA to access the server. I have disable this product and my hacker
> >problems disappeared.
>
> Is samba able to access any directory other than those you specifically
> specify as shares in the smb.conf?
Sort of. Last time I looked it would happily follow symlinks outside the
share's 'root' directory.
A symlink to / allows access to the whole lot..
Matthew.
------------------------------
From: Dieter Hackl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Disappearing Default IP Route
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:14:06 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you're using dynamic ip addresses, you have to put the /sbin/init.d/route
start command into your /etc/ppp/ip-up script.
i had the same problem, and found this solution in a german linux database.
this problem occurs only if you are getting a dynamic ip address from your
provider.
dodo.
August Johnson wrote:
> I've got a problem that's plagued several Redhat 5.0 systems I've made.
> I've used the network setup to set up the default IP route. This route
> works for 5-10 minutes and then disappears from the routing table. If I
> then manually type it in "route add -net 0.0.0.0 gw 209.63.xxx.xxx eth0"
> everything works fine from then on, as long as I don't restart the system.
>
> I tried putting this statement in rc.local, but it acts no different.
> Until the route vanishes on it's own, typing it manually won't make it stay
> around. Can anyone tell me if I'm missing something? The Redhat
> installation is just as it comes when it's installed from the CD. Yeah, I
> know I should be using 5.2, that'll happen soon.
>
> Thanks!
>
> August
------------------------------
From: Dieter Hackl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: nameserver problem
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:21:22 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi!
i have set up a nameserver with a forwarding entry to my isp's dns.
now my ippp-daemon is dialing every 3 to 4 minutes with udp-request to
my isp's dns.
i dont know which names or ip-addresses it wants to resolve for i
declared all important hosts
(like gateway, point-to-point-partner,dynamic ip-addresses) in my local
nameserver, and turned off samba (is browsing all networks) too.
is there any configuration file where i can define udp request to
ignore?
Thank you!
dodo.
------------------------------
From: Troutman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Netgear FA310TX, new tulip.c, still doesn't work
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 21:33:26 GMT
Bob Koss wrote:
>
> Dale Miracle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >I am using FA310tx's under slackware I have kernel version 2.0.36 and
> >the tulip.c is one that came with it..I didn't have to use the new one
> >(the one provided by Netgear) my other slack box is using 2.0.30 which
> >needed the new tulip.c . Have you tried using the netgear seperate?
> >The memory ranges of the two cards could be conflicting and the 3com is
> >winning.
>
> I found my problem -- it was my PCI slot. Nothing I put in there
> worked. I went out and bought an ISA card and it works like a charm.
> Only 10Mps, but that's still faster than my internet connection.
Found mine too. Recompiled the 5.2 kernel with just tulip installed and
it worked great. Thanks to all ;-)
------------------------------
From: "minstrel" <none>
Subject: Sendmail is running, so why the download error?
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 21:19:44 GMT
It's me again. Yes, I have sendmail active. So, what would cause me to get
a SMTP connect failure? I'm almost at wits end with this. Do I have to be
root to properly run fetchmail? I can check my mail fine, but if there's
mail I get that awful SMTP transaction error. Help!
Thanks again,
Aaron Mitchell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PS. Much thanks to everyone who has already offered their support. I very
much appreciate it.
------------------------------
From: "Scott MacDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: eth and ppp settings deactivate sometimes, help
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 15:42:32 -0600
Sometimes when I am configuring a linux box, I lose the eth0, eth1, and ppp
settings. And if I go in the networking control panel, they are listed as
inactive. When I activate them, I can then see them with the ifconfig
command. Why is this? Is there a way they can always be active? I don't want
them to ever be inactive. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.
Scott
------------------------------
From: Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Long pauses on bootup/reboot.
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 20:56:29 GMT
Digital Wokan wrote:
>
> Seems like RH 5.1 keeps stopping for several minutes every time it tries
> to start 'amd', 'sendmail', and 'smb' (if there are more, I haven't been
> patient enough to reach them). Can anyone suggest to me why my system
> (K5-133) would take so long to start those?
> --
>
It is doing a DNS lookup and timing out. Try putting some addresses in
/etc/hosts and also setting the resolve order to host table first, then
bind.
-Matt
--
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--------- Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY ---------+
+--------- TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 ------------+
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 14:25:32 -0700
From: Paul Hardiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: 3C905B-TX
This card seems to run faster in win98 mode and linux.
Any suggestions??
--
Regards,
Paul Hardiman
InterMedia, Inc (Colorado)
Informations Systems Consulting
303-581-0606, Fax 581-0506, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Jayasuthan [VorHacker] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: User quota
Date: 20 Jan 99 11:50:05 GMT
Not Very hard... here few thing you need...
1. touch /mount_point/quota.user "mount_point where you disk mounted"
2. touch /mount_point/quota.group "if you wanted to limit group"
3. add line in /etc/fstab
/dev/hda1 / ext2 defaults,usrquota,grpquota 1 1
^this is mine fstab... u need to add "usrquota" and "grpquota".
4. chmod 700 //mount_point/quota.* " security option"
5. reboot
6... bla bla bla.... now limit user quota by "edquota -u username"
Simon Andre Simonsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Hello!
: Does anyone know how to set up user disk quota ???
: If you have any information about this, feel free to E-mail me.
--
===============================================================================
Jayasuthan
[Fairchild Information System Support]
[Internal]
http://eplx01/suthan/
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[External]
http://still.working.on
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Travis Lower" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Travis Lower" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PCI FAST Ethernet DEC 21143 Based Adapter
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 07:21:14 -0500
I am trying to get LINUX to network over my
"PCI FAST Ethernet DEC 21143 Based Adapter"
ethernet card but it doesn't seem to work.
Does anyone know if linux 5.2(Red Hat Deluxe) supports this network card?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Ken Oster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ATT worldnet ??? PPP
Date: 20 Jan 1999 03:56:21 GMT
AT&T Worldnet uses CHAP. I'm using it (connected with X-ISP) right now..
Ken O
Jack Machinist wrote:
>
> Jim Bisnett wrote:
>
> > I just moved back to the states and have an ATT worldnet account. I am
> > having problems connecting with linux. I can get the phone to dial, and
> > then have ATT pickup but from there the rest never correctly finishs.
> > Has anyone had any success with ATT worldnet. Do they us PAP or CHAP? Do
> > they do anything different than normal? I am using REDHAT 5.1.
> >
> > Jim
>
> Jim,
> I believe they use PAP. Turn debugging on for PPPD to see for sure.
> The trick is to enclose your password in double quotes.
>
> Jack
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: DHCP Client not working with ADSL and Bellsouth.net
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 07:19:52 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tina wrote:
>
> > It may depend on what kernel version you are using. After kernel
v2.1.something
> > the DHCPCD v0.70 will not work. I use a roadrunner cable modem, and I
downloaded
> > a newer daemon "rrdhcpcd" and it worked.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have seen a ton of messages concerning setting up Linux for ADSL in
> > > combination with having to use DHCP but none of them have helped me to
solve
> > > my problem.
> Due to a path problem, you may be running the old .70 which definitely doesn't
work,
I remembered to remove 0.70 first so this wouldn't be an issue. Sorry I
didn't mention that before, but thank you for posting. That might be someone
else's issue :).
- Darricke
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: DOES LINUX SUCK
Date: 19 Jan 1999 19:12:20 -0800
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Arthur says...
>
>Jim Ross wrote:
>
>To install downloaded rpm's under KDE:
>
>1. Open kfm file manager (one click)
>2. Find the subdirectory you d/l'd to (I realize this
>may be a problem for some Windows users)
>3. Left click the package name
>4. After kpackage opens, click install
>5. Wait (less than 15 seconds on average)
>6. Close kpackage, kinstall
>7. Run the program
>
>(You can also do this from the command line even more
>quickly, or use xrpm or glint if you're not using KDE)
>
expect you need to install KDE to use kfm.
and wih KDE rpms, you need to install the packages in correct order you
twit.
you sort of hand waved your hands of this little point, did'nt you?
there are core rpms for KDE and then the extra/additional ones.
so it is not as easy as you pretend it is.
offcourse a real user friendly system would not put the purdon on the user
to figure the order of those 6 or 7 rpms to install. but offcourse this is
unix. if the things was so seemless with no manual steps involved and no
things the user need to know before hand, then it will a boring system,
and there will be nothing to tinker with.
a real system will be much simpler that what you said.
a real easy to use system will work like this:
You see a "package" or set of packages on the net, to install them, you
drag it/them , and drop it/them, on "my computer".
DONE.
the 'system' will WORRY about everything else.
drag+drop.
that is all what should be needed to do this.
you can even drag a whole collection of packages, and it will still work.
drag+drop.
nothing more.
none of this rpm crap at the user level. burry RPM inside only for those
who want to use it directly.
drag+drop.
learn this concept. it's good for you.
Bob
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: DOES LINUX SUCK
Date: 20 Jan 1999 03:32:14 -0800
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>
>In article <783tmf$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> the User says WHAT they want done. the system figure the HOW.
>>
>> it is really simple. what is hard to understand??
>>
>> Bob
>>
>
>I'm sorry but it is YOU who doesn't understand. You obviously don't
>know what you are talking about. NO computer has this capability.
lets analyze a little what you just said, shall we?
first, you babble and say i dont understand what i am talking about.
then, in the same breath, you utter the words "no cpmputer has this
capability".
this is exactly my point!!!!! which is the system we have now is
broke and can be much much more intellgeint. just becuase this system
does not yet exist, does not mean it can't be written.
with software one can do anything.
it is all a matter of how hard one want to work at it to make it easier
to use. you do this step by step.
look at the RPM example. certinally RPM can be made easier where it
finds missing dependcenies it will do more than just emit some stupid
message about missing a file.
it can do better. it can list the missing messages automatically (without
the user having to know the command to do so).
it can do even more. it can telll the user what packages are missing and
ALSO ask them if they want to download them now autoammtically.
It can do even more. it can dialout itself, go to the site itself, and
download the packages itself instead of having the user do it.
it can do more. it can download the packages and install them automatically.
and so on.
you need to open your horizon more. and not be limited by what the
current system can do, and not try to do more to make it easier.
>You
>prove me wrong by writing the software that does EXACTLY what you have
>described above. I will install your software and say "I want the
>current version of XEmacs installed with sound enabled and only the
>GUI interface. Oh BTW I forgot, install it on my Alpha and also on my
>Pentium" to my computer.
>
this is not hard. what is so hard about it???? what are the technical
problems that will prevent good programmers to be not able to design such
a system???
it is a matter of will. if programmers realy want to do such a system,
they will do it. but programmers are lazy as a rule. if someothing works,
then no they dont want to improve it. and they want to go do something else
new.
Bob
------------------------------
From: Klaus Leopold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: device or resource busy
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:37:20 GMT
hello!!
i've a problem with my ne2000 - ethernet-card. linux don't find the card
any longer. if i'm booting linux i receive following message: no card at
0x240 irq=11 found. by typing: modprobe eth1 (eth1 is my ne2000-card) i
receive following message:
/lib/modules/2.0.35/net/ne.o: init_module: Device or resource busy
i've configured my card by editing the /etc/conf.modules with the values
of my card (0x240, irq=11). it worked many month fine - today i got
problems!?! i want to mention here that the card works under windoze!!!
is there anyone who can help me??
thanks in advance, Klaus
=====
http://www.edu.uni-klu.ac.at/~kleopold
-
life could be much easier
if we just could see the source code
=====
------------------------------
From: "Guy A. Wadsworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,comp.sys.sun.admin,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.win95
Subject: Re: Connect without hub
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 07:38:44 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert Yoder wrote:
> From: http://www.lantronix.com/htmfiles/mrktg/catalog/et.htm
>
> "A hub takes any incoming signal and repeats it out all ports."
>
> That is, a hub is just a multi-port repeater.
> It makes _NO_ decisions about the communication going on between
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> machines.
>
Not quite true, although we may just be talking semantics.
A hub (multi-port repeater) will enforce collisions when
detected. See my previous post for how a hub handles and
enforces collisions.
Guy.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix,redhat.networking.general,aus.computers.linux
Subject: Re: Security hole with WU-FTPD
Date: 20 Jan 1999 11:25:15 +0100
In article <78290m$30j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have seen this happen before. In my case the hacker first broke into an NT
>machine (has microsoft ever made a product that was secure? ;-) ) then used
>SAMBA to access the server. I have disable this product and my hacker
>problems disappeared.
Is samba able to access any directory other than those you specifically
specify as shares in the smb.conf?
Villy
------------------------------
From: Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: S: MB86965 Ethernetcontroller-Driver
Date: 19 Jan 1999 22:59:37 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Wick) writes:
> for an onboard-ethernetcard with a Fujitsu MB86965 Controller, i search a
> Drivermodule to include in Kernel 2.0.36.
Look at at1700.c. It has code to read the at1700 EEPROM, but you can
surely dike that out.
--
-russ nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://crynwr.com/~nelson
Crynwr supports Open Source(tm) Software| PGPok | There is good evidence
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | that freedom is the
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | cause of world peace.
------------------------------
From: Samuel Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: hostname (none)
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:14:32 +0000
Hi,
Can anyone tell me where the hostname is set? I'd like for my
hostname to be something other than (none)
I tried setting it in ./etc/hostname and in /etc/hosts without
much success. It still seems to come up as (none)
Can someone tell me what I need to do?
thanks,
sam
------------------------------
From: mlw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: DOES LINUX SUCK
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:53:48 +0000
Sam wrote:
> What have you been smoking ?
>
> I have never seen it not "work". We have hundreds of laptops at work,
> they are all Windows95 and they all work using PCMCIA network cards
> and sometimes modems.
>
> Sam
All I can say is your experience has been way different than mine. Was
there a list of supported PCMCIA card you used as a reference? For us,
there was just no way to get Network cards to work while the modem was
installed, and vice versa. We tried all different manufactorers and
types. Plus the card weren't cheap either.
--
Mohawk Software
Windows 95, Windows NT, UNIX, Linux. Applications, drivers, support.
Visit the Mohawk Software website: www.mohawksoft.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,linux.redhat.install
Subject: Re: DOES LINUX SUCK
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:59:21 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:10:08 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam) wrote:
>Oh, I understand COLA now, if you have a problem with Windows it's the
>operating system. if you have a problem with Linux it's the user.
>
>Logical.
That's what is disturbing me too. First:
In the Linux community there are a lot of friendly, helpful people who like to
help even a bloody beginner. This was the good news.
But: there are also lots of very arrogant individuals who think they are
superior to the rest of the world, just because they know some tricks to make
Linux run. I think this approach is not helpful to make Linux attractive to a
newcomer, who mostly has lot of experience in other OS's, like Win95/98/NT.
BTW: the famous blue screen, that some Linux fans argue to show up 2 times a
day, I have only seen 1 or 2 times in 3 years of NT experience.
It's nice to know that a long-time Linux user can setup a system in one hour.
But please accept that a long-time Windows user can do the same, and how long
would you take to setup Windows with no (I mean NO) experience ?
Another Linux newcomer, who likes the system.
Regards, Eggert
=====================================================
Answers please in this newsgroup!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Cooperstein)
Subject: Re: Recommendations for an External ISDN Modem?
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 12:56:59 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>I am looking for an external ISDN modem to hook up to a Linux router.
>Has anyone tried or had success w/ the 3Com IQImpact, or any other
>external ISDN modems? BTW, I am using GTE for my local service to
>install the lines ( are there any compatibility issues? )
>
>Thanks for any advice.
I use a Motorola BitSurfr PRO external ISDN TA. I use both B channels to
connect to my ISP for home network of three Windoze PC's, get pretty good
throughput as well. Many people in this ng have tried the 3Com IQ (which I
also own and am familiar with, but havent hooked it up using Linux) and have
complained that they cannot figure out how to get a 2B connection. I'm not
sure what the problem is, whether it's with their configuration or the
hardware itself not being "Linux friendly".
Things to be aware of:
I. If you are planning on using a built in serial port on your motherboard
(vanialla 16550), then use the production kernel (2.0.36), and don't read any
further...
2. If you are planning on using both B channels and have a high speed serial
card (16650 or 16750 based; I use a Turbocom 920) then be aware that to get
support for these UARTS you will need to go to a development kernel, as it's
currently not in production. I've settled on 2.1.130 for various reasons.
3. If you decide on number two above, then be aware that the development
kernels dont use the same method of IP masquerading as the production kernel.
The newer kernels use ipchains and not ipfwadm. Ipchains is not as widely
used, and therefore there's not a whole lot written about them in terms of
"friendly examples" for people who (like myself) want to replace a Windows
proxy server (formerly Wingate) with a Linux router/firewall just because I
want to learn more about Linux. It's difficult setting up a Linux
router/firewall if you're new to this sort of thing, and it gets more
complicated if you use non-production stuff (like newer kernels and the like).
Be that as it may, it works, but plan on spending some time getting it up and
running!
Regards,
Mark
** Remove ".nospam" when replying or email will bounce back to you...
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
