Linux-Networking Digest #993, Volume #9 Mon, 25 Jan 99 11:13:40 EST
Contents:
3c509 problem (Lun)
SuSe rooting from 2 nets to internet (Manfred Lemke)
Re: Ether broke in Linux, still works in Win98?!? ("Jeff Volckaert")
Re: Why would X not work after istalling a NIC? (Mogens Kjaer)
Re: d-link DFE-530TX (Mogens Kjaer)
Re: Test - please ignore (Kevin Martin)
Re: NFS linux->osf1 slow, linux->irix fast (Torsten Blank)
Re: What could "modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17" be? (Jeffrey T Kowalczyk)
Re: help setting up ethernet card in redhat 5.2 ("Jeff Volckaert")
Re: ipautofw with redhat 5.2 ("Jeff Volckaert")
Re: Win98 not answering pings from RH 5.2 (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: RH5.2 Dual NIC Startup Troubles (Tom Morris)
Re: Setup modem on Sony Vaio 505 notebook ("KO")
Re: Basic Home Network Guidance - Please ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Problem with internet connection: no response from anything but provider (Edwin van
Geelen)
ftp upload: permissions question (Hendrik =?iso-8859-1?Q?Krau=DF?=)
command ARP (Adresse Resolution Protocol) ? (Chouki Aktouf)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lun)
Subject: 3c509 problem
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 13:46:52 GMT
I have install the RH 5.2 but I cannot setup my 3c509 card, when
startup and shutdown, it shown a message "symbol for parameter I/O not
found". Is my card's setup problem?? How can I fix it.
Thank you very much
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Manfred Lemke)
Subject: SuSe rooting from 2 nets to internet
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 21:50:04 +0100
I have a problem with my rooting and Linux, SuSe5.3, in combination with
Apache webserver . I have 2 nets. One of them works correct and I can
use with my clients in this net over the linix-machine the internet. The
second net is connected to the first over a novell-machine. I can ping
the linux-machine from the second net, but only the netcard eth0, not
die ISDN-card ippp0.
Who can help me? Many thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 0049 228 469532
Fax: 0049 228
479342
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Volckaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ether broke in Linux, still works in Win98?!?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:09:49 -0500
Try setting it to jumperless at irq=10, io=300 and reserve those in your
bios for "isa legacy devices" . This will prevent anything from jumping on
it. I've had some problems in the past with funky ISA PNP cards.
Jeff Volckaert
Christian G. Allred wrote in message <78du34$b1t$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have an ISA PnP ethernet card which up 'till a little while ago
>was working in Linux, but no longer does so. I don't know what may
>have changed to cause it to stop, but it won't work.
>
>Although the card works just fine under Windows 98 (gets IP via DHCP,
>can telnet, ftp, play StarCraft etc. just fine), under Linux it causes
>the driver to output errors to the kernel, whether using dhcpcd or static
>addresses. The errors are "ARP: called for own IP" (or similar), followed
>by "eth0: Tx timed out. Lost interrupt? TSR=<number> ISR=<number>
>t=<number>". This error I know comes from
/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/8390.c
>but I don't know what's causing it. The card gets properly configured
>with isapnp, and the driver is loaded with the right io and irq. In fact,
>the problem exists even if the card is set with jumpers.
>
>So why does it work in Winblows 98 and not Linux? Any clues?
>
>Email replies would be appreciated, though any help would be great.
>
>--
> .-------------------. .------------------------------------.
> / Christian G. Allred \ / Assistant System Administrator \
>/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] \/ BYU Electrical Engineering Department \
>\ (801) 378-8743 /\ Provo, Utah, USA /
> \ Callsign - KD7DIE / \ http://www.ee.byu.edu/~chris /
> `-------------------' `------------------------------------'
------------------------------
From: Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Why would X not work after istalling a NIC?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 14:46:30 +0100
Darren Ford wrote:
>
> I installed a NIC and it is recognised by the tulip driver. I
> configured TCP/IP and now X won't come up. Why would this happen? Or
> is something else wrong?
Could it be an irq conflict?
What does /proc/pci, /proc/interrupts, and /proc/ioports say
with/without the NIC present?
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg Laboratory, Dept. of Chemistry
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.crc.dk
------------------------------
From: Mogens Kjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: d-link DFE-530TX
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 14:52:50 +0100
Luis Rodrigues wrote:
>
> This card uses a chipset from Digital, use the driver for the Digital
> card and it will work without problems. I can't remember now what the
> chip is but you can confirm.
>
> I have several D-Link cards using it.
DFE-500TX and DE-530CT uses the tulip driver.
I think the DFE-530TX card needs the via-rhine.c driver.
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg Laboratory, Dept. of Chemistry
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.crc.dk
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Martin)
Subject: Re: Test - please ignore
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 14:53:29 GMT
In article <78gg44$ctp$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, it says [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>This is a test post - please ignore
No, we won't ignore it. That gives all the "newbies" the idea that they can
get away with it, and that's bad for everyone.
"Ignore" is an instruction to the robots that monitor the TEST groups to
tell them you don't need a reply. Well, WE AREN'T ROBOTS!
Use alt.test. That's what it's there for. Posting tests to live groups,
especially busy ones like this one, is not a good idea.
------------------------------
From: Torsten Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS linux->osf1 slow, linux->irix fast
Date: 25 Jan 1999 15:59:28 +0100
... sorry ... no solution.
Here we have the same problem. I have posted in lots of newsgroups, and
asked lots of linux people, without any success. The nfs data flow
from the Linux PCs to the OSF DEC Alphas is limited to 250 kB/s
independent of the band width. Neither installation of the new 2.2.0
kernel nor playing with the mount options wsize/rsize does help.
Torsten Blank
------------------------------
From: Jeffrey T Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: What could "modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17" be?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:43:25 -0500
I'm still trying to find information on net-pf-17, as pertains to proper
loading of the dhcpcd 1.3.17 daemon. I need the updated dhcpcd support for
my cablemodem. DHCP to ny NT box works great with the original 0.70 dhcpcd
version.
I haven't compiled a custom kernel yet, this is RH5.2. The README says I
should have kernel support for SOCK_PACKET, and the author says I may be
having trouble with it as a module. How do I tell if this SOCK_PACKET is in
the standard kernel.
Thanks for the help. This is kind of heady stuff for my first day using
linux.:)
Jeffrey T Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:78gqf2$9g4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm running the 1.3.17 dhcpcd daemon, and get a startup error of
> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-17
>
> Where can I look for information on this module? Is it related to my build
> of the dhcpcd binary, or is the 17 cooincidence?
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Volckaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: help setting up ethernet card in redhat 5.2
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:12:10 -0500
Please post the specs of your network card. I don't have much experience
with PCI ethernet cards (since I usually use ISA jumperless cards to save
PCI slots), but maybe someone else will jump in and help as well.
Jeff Volckaert
XUnKoWnX1 wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>i do not know how to setup my card, i have looked over the for a while now,
i
>have it setup in win 98, its a PnP driver. Please Help
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Volckaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipautofw with redhat 5.2
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 09:20:12 -0500
You need to recompile your kernel with IPAUTOFW enabled and get
ftp://ftp.netis.com/pub/members/rlynch/ipautofw.tar.gz which has the
ipautofw program.
The following URLs should help as well.
http://toocool.calpoly.edu/linux/masquerading.html
http://www.tor.shaw.wave.ca/~ambrose/
Jeff Volckaert
Michael T Howard wrote in message ...
>I am running redhat 5.2, firewall, ip_masquerade + cable modem with a
>Winblows boxe behind the firewall.
>
>I need to redirect some inbound UDP reqests to one of the Win boxes ... for
>www.zone.com Fighter Ace.
>
>I think that I need to run ipautofw. But the ipautofw code isn't installed
>on my system, and I can't figure out where to get it.
>
>Also, do I need to recompile the kernel and enable something? (I found
>several references to this, but they seemed pretty old.)
>
>Please advise.
>
>Thanks,
>Michael
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win98 not answering pings from RH 5.2
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 10:57:07 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Something basic is wrong if you had to hand enter the 98's mac
address into linux unless there is some specific reason because
of the cards your using. Arp arbitration should get these
addresses.
Watch the dialog with tcpdump -nei -eth0.
What is ifconfig -a, route.
What is nbtstat -A xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx?
What in hosts, lmhosts, networks on the MS machines?
What is ipconfig /all on MS?
What is /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 & lo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I've installed a LAN with a Win98 machine (/w 3c905b-tx) and a Redhat 5.2 (/w
> 3c509), connected via a 10mbit Hub. Win98 is 192.168.1.1 (nmask
> 255.255.255.0) and no other entries. Linux machine is 192.168.1.2 (nmask
> 255.255.255.0), with a route to the 192.168.1.0 net, the Win98 machine
> entered in 'hosts' and it's hardware adress added to the ARP table. Whenever
> I try to ping the Win98 machine, it doesn't answer. I can see the outgoing
> pins on my hub, but Win98 sends out packets only every few seconds (who knows
> where to??). After some flood-pings, netstat -e said that Win98 received
> 3.6mb of data, but send out only 30K.
>
> I've spend hours rebooting Win98, but he still doesn't answer pings. Is this a
> Win98 problem or do I have to add any specific routes/gateways to Win98?
>
> I would apreciate every piece of help.
> Thanx in advance
> Stefan Schwarter
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Tom Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH5.2 Dual NIC Startup Troubles
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 15:55:34 GMT
I don't belive it's the Video card as it's an AGP and has no conflict under
Win95. Also, I can bring the networking stuff up manually after the startup
scripts are done and all works OK.. I will, however, double check that.
Tom
Thomas Chai wrote:
> I have that problem exactly.......and after much hacking I found it is an
> IRQ conflict. The kernel used irq 10 by default (which is used by my display
> card) on not shown on /proc/interrupt). Try to find an empty IRQ....maybe 9
> or 12
>
> Good Luck
>
> Tom Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> >I just had @Home installed. Everything is working (more or less) but I
> >am having trouble getting the networks to start up automatically at boot
> >time. I can successfully start the networks up manually. Needless to say
> >I'd like them to start by themselves.
> >
> >I upgraded my RH5.2 release to the 2.0.36-3 kernel prior to the
> >installation. That all went OK. I am running the stock kernel with IP
> >Masquerade active. After the @Home install I reinstalled and configured
> >the second NIC. The 3c509 is the TCI supplied cable modem NIC (irq 10,
> >at 0x2f0) and should be eth0. The other NIC is a 3c905 (not a 'b').
> >
> >I have tried several configurations. None of them get rid of the error
> >message delcaring the lack of dependency information. I currently have
> >'append "ether=10,0x2f0,eth0 ether=eth1"' in the lilo.conf file. The
> >conf.modules file contains
> >
> >alias net-pf-4 off
> >alias net-pf-5 off
> >alias eth0 3c509
> >options eth0 io=0x2f0 irq=10
> >alias eth1 3c59x
> >
> >
> >The startup log messages are below.
> >=================================
> >Jan 24 01:01:02 C782663-A syslogd: exiting on signal 15
> >Jan 24 01:02:02 C782663-A syslogd 1.3-3: restart.
> >Jan 24 01:02:02 C782663-A kernel: klogd 1.3-3, log source = /proc/kmsg
> >started.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Loaded 4254 symbols from
> >/boot/System.map.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Symbols match kernel version 2.0.36.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: No module symbols loaded.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Memory: sized by int13 088h
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Console: 16 point font, 400 scans
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Console: colour VGA+ 80x25, 1 virtual
> >console (max 63)
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: pcibios_init : BIOS32 Service
> >Directory structure at 0x000f7440
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: pcibios_init : BIOS32 Service
> >Directory entry at 0xfd7b1
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: pcibios_init : PCI BIOS revision 2.10
> >entry at 0xfd9cc
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Probing PCI hardware.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Calibrating delay loop.. ok - 232.65
> >BogoMIPS
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Memory: 63140k/65536k available (748k
> >kernel code, 384k reserved, 1264k data)
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Swansea University Computer Society
> >NET3.035 for Linux 2.0
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: NET3: Unix domain sockets 0.13 for
> >Linux NET3.035.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Swansea University Computer Society
> >TCP/IP for NET3.034
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: IP Protocols: IGMP, ICMP, UDP, TCP
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Linux IP multicast router 0.07.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_5.6.0
> >initialized
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel:
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Checking 386/387 coupling... Ok, fpu
> >using exception 16 error reporting.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Checking 'hlt' instruction... Ok.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Linux version 2.0.36
> >([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.7.2.3) #1 Tue Dec 29 13:11:13 EST
> >1998
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Starting kswapd v 1.4.2.2
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Serial driver version 4.13 with no
> >serial options enabled
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: PS/2 auxiliary pointing device
> >detected -- driver installed.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Real Time Clock Driver v1.09
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Ramdisk driver initialized : 16
> >ramdisks of 4096K size
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: ide: i82371 PIIX (Triton) on PCI bus 0
> >function 57
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: ide0: BM-DMA at 0xfcf0-0xfcf7
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: ide1: BM-DMA at 0xfcf8-0xfcff
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: hda: QUANTUM FIREBALL ST3.2A, 3079MB
> >w/81kB Cache, CHS=782/128/63, UDMA
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: hdc: TOSHIBA CD-ROM XM-6202B, ATAPI
> >CDROM drive
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: FDC 0 is a National Semiconductor
> >PC87306
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: md driver 0.36.3 MAX_MD_DEV=4,
> >MAX_REAL=8
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: scsi : 0 hosts.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: scsi : detected total.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Partition check:
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 hda6 hda7 hda8
> >hda9 hda10 hda11 hda12 hda13 >
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem)
> >readonly.
> >Jan 24 01:02:03 C782663-A kernel: Adding Swap: 100764k swap-space
> >(priority -1)
> >Jan 24 01:02:07 C782663-A modprobe: no dependency information for
> >module: "/lib/modules/2.0.36/net/3c59x.o"
> >Jan 24 01:02:08 C782663-A modprobe: no dependency information for
> >module: "/lib/modules/2.0.36/net/3c59x.o"
> >=====================================
> >
> >The modules.dep file does contain a reference to the 3c59x.o file and
> >the file is in the correct directory.
> >
> >In any event, at this point all I need to do to get things running is
> >
> >insmod 3c509
> >insmod 3c59x
> >/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start
> >
> >The DHCP connection is completed and my Win95 machines are masqueraded
> >w/o any problems.
> >
> >I've reviewed several HOWTO's, postings, etc. No luck in solving this.
> >Hopefully, it's an embarassingly simple solution. Any help with this
> >will be greatly appreciated.
> >
> >Tom Morris
> >
> >
------------------------------
From: "KO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: Setup modem on Sony Vaio 505 notebook
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 20:01:06 +0200
Felix Lam wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>hi there,
>
>I have been trying to setup the 56K internal modem with
>redhat 5.1 and tried to make call using minicom.
>
>ATDTxxxxxxxx
>NO DIAL TONE
>
>I have fiddled with the init string (ATZ, AT&FX3 ...etc)
>but still no luck. I checked the IRQ and stuff with setserial
>and appear fine (com2, i.e. on /dev/cua1).
>
>This modem works fine on my win98 setup.
>
>Thanks a lot in advance. This has been bugging me for
>nights now ... :(
I had the same problem. My problem was caused by plug'n'play modem.
I copied modem settings on paper (from win98), set p'n'p off by modems
jumpers
and then set the modem to match those settings I wrote on paper. Now I had
to
re-install the driver on win98 that it worked over there again, but now it
worked on Linux also.
So plug'n'play was the problem for me.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Basic Home Network Guidance - Please
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 17:33:59 GMT
RH 5.1/2.0.35
PPP works great from x using activate/deactivate. I also have a w95 station
that I would like to connect to the linux dial-up, but..
The IP masq how-to suggests that the kernel must be re-compiled with some new
options. What I would like to know is how to determine the options that are
currently selected since it will ask for each of them during the
configuration.
I tried 'make menuconfig' to get around all that, but it reports 'curses.h'
is missing. I have ncurses installed - is that the same deal? There doesn't
appear to be a curses.h anywhere on my system.
Thanks,
FF
In article <78d5nl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Byron A Jeff) wrote:
> In article <f7nq2.204$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> David Francis <david@no-spam,dcf.net> wrote:
> -Hello:
> -
> -I have just torn down a dedicated PPP internet connection with a block of
> -assigned IP addresses and moved the server to my office. Now, back at the
> -homefront, I have set up a brand-new RedHat 5.2 LINUX system...
> -
> -My only Internet access now is a dynamicaly assigned IP address through a
> -dial-up connection. I want to set-up my LINUX box to dial-out on demand from
my
> -Win9* boxes on the home LAN.
> -
> -LINUX Box= 192.168.0.1
> -Win9* Box= 192.168.0.2
> -
> -I don't need to be "spoon fed" the steps. I'd just like to get others input
on
> -how they handle this routing scenario, security considerations, various
> -options, etc...
>
> Isn't too hard. Configure the Linux box to have dial on demand PPP. the 2.3.5
> PPP version does this. Then set up the box to masqerade throught the PPP link.
> This will change the outgoing addresses to the PPP IP.
>
> Securitywise there isn't much to worry about beyond the standard stuff, like
> checking the RH secuity pages and turning off any non-essential servies on the
> Linux box.
>
> Thanks about it. Hope this helps. There are PPP and Masquerading HOWTOs in
> the standard places like http://www.linux.org.
>
> BAJ
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edwin van Geelen)
Subject: Problem with internet connection: no response from anything but provider
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 12:52:11 GMT
Hi,
(Config: S.u.S.E. 5.3, kernel 2.0.35, isdn, ppp) I have no problem connecting
to my internet provider, and pinging to that domain works a treat. However,
when I try to reach any other domain, there is no response. The nameservers
are working correctly, because ping does show the ip address.
What can be the reason for this?
P.S. My newsfeed is rather unreliable, so I'd appreciate response (also) via
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
Edwin
------------------------------
From: Hendrik =?iso-8859-1?Q?Krau=DF?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp upload: permissions question
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 18:35:59 +0100
Hi,
If I upload files to my Suse-5.2 server via ftp, they have -rw-r-----
permissions. For accessing them with Apache web server, they have to be
at least -rw-r--r--. I'm tired of uploading a file, closing ftp, opening
a telnet connection and doing a "chmod 744 xyz.html".
Where can I set which permissions uploaded files initially get?
Regards,
Hendrik
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chouki Aktouf)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: command ARP (Adresse Resolution Protocol) ?
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 15:26:30 +0200
Hi,
I installed Linux (RedHat 5.1) and I have typed arp (to analyse
Ethernet/IP addresses). It works but
FEW minutes after typing the command?!
Is there a way to configure the time in order to ensure a fast ARP answer?
Thanks in advance
Chouki
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Chouki Aktouf
Tel : 04 75 75 94 31
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
