Linux-Networking Digest #35, Volume #10 Thu, 28 Jan 99 17:13:38 EST
Contents:
Re: DHCP Linux server and subnets help (Stephen Carville)
Re: forward comm port over tcp/ip ? (Matt Kressel)
Re: Some recent lessons for those going from NT to linux. ("Keith G. Murphy")
Re: Masquerade and Static IP number ? (David Efflandt)
Re: Am I under netbios and httpsd (on Linux) attack? ("donoli")
Re: POP3 (Matt Kressel)
Having trouble with simple filtering firewall on Linux...help(!)
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
help: ftp daemon for ftp accounts??? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: PPP Setup for Uswest.net Dial in (Mike Horwath)
Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong? (Darren Ford)
Re: My Stupid little routing tutorial - Works for me (HTML File - I hope) -
mslrt.htm (0/1) (Dark Knight)
Re: Routing questios (M. Buchenrieder)
Re: HELP: pppd drops after exactly 1 hour - (long) (Colin Guillas)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Stephen Carville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP Linux server and subnets help
Date: 28 Jan 1999 04:20:34 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am setting up a DHCP server on Redhat 5.1 running
> ISC DHCPD V2-BETA-1-PATCHLEVEL-6
I'm using the same version so maybe I can help.
> Our network has a router that seperates our class C ip address in to 4
> segments.
>
> The subnetting of each segment occurs every so many IP numbers, fo example:
>
> xxx.xxx.xxx.32 is segment A with a mask of 255.255.255.224
> The port for that router segment is xxx.xxx.xxx.33 (i.e. the client's gateway
> for that subnet).
>
> and so on.
>
> I set-up the linux server on segment A, and configured a couple of clients to
> test it. They have no problems getting IP addresses and info from the server.
> But when I have a machine, on say segment C of the router, it doesn't work.
>
[conf file snipped]
> When monitoring the server in debug mode I notice it seems to only be
> listening to it's own subnet and none of the others.
DHCP cannot cross a router without help. This is inherent in the
protocol. You need to configure your router to pass the DHCP packets to
your server. If that is not practical, then set up a DHCP-relay agent on
each of the subnets you are serving. See "man dhcrelay" for help on
setting up a relay agent
--
Stephen Carville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====================================================
Management: The art of hiring intelligent, skilled individuals and then
ignoring their advice.
------------------------------
From: Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: forward comm port over tcp/ip ?
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:42:26 GMT
Wolfgang wrote:
>
> ok, this is what my setup looks like: there is a 486 PC running
> linux with a modem connected. I also hooked up my notebook
> to that machine with ethernet. I use this box for dialing out
> (ip masquearding), it just workes fine.
> What's missing is a posibility to use winfax with my notebook
> wihout running to the modem, plugging cables in and out and so on.
> I thought if there was program for win9x and linux that
> tunnels a comm-port over the network, why shouldn't it work ?
> It would look like that there is a virtual comm port on the notebook,
> say com5 or whatever, that transmits any i/o data over tcp/ip to a
> daemon listening on the linux machine. There again the data is
> forwarded to the real comm port with the modem connected - sounds
> reasonable, no ?
> Thanks for any suggestions on how to realize this idea.
>
>
Look into HylaFax. It is a faxing server for Linux that allows remote
connections. There is a Windows 9x client for Hylafax too. It just
shows up as a normal printer under windows.
-Matt
--
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--------- Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY ---------+
+--------- TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 ------------+
------------------------------
From: "Keith G. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Some recent lessons for those going from NT to linux.
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:26:29 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rich Mycroft wrote:
>
> Well, being in the newbie cateory thought I'd pass along three things I've
> learned in this last week.
>
> 1) Linksys cards do not seem to behave well under linux networking. Stick
> with 3com or intel as these have been just fine.
Hmmm. Had a devil of a time getting my 3Com 3c905b-tx working with
Linux (had to get the Becker driver off the web), but my Linksys Ether16
was easy to configure with Debian. (I *did* need to run the included
SETUP.EXE from DOS to make it non-PNP). They both seem to be running
flawlessly.
You make me curious: what problems have you had? Far as I can tell, the
Linksys stuff is straight NE2000-compatible; they now even advertise
Linux-compatibility on the box.
------------------------------
From: David Efflandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Masquerade and Static IP number ?
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 04:28:23 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/24/99, 10:24:59 PM, QCT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding=20
Masquerade and Static IP number ?:
> Dear Friend,
> I have a linux server which have a private IP#: 192.168.1.1 . Now I=20
just
> have a dedicated dial-up access with a static ip number. My ISP said I=
> just make a dial up as usual, then their server will assign a same IP
> address every time when I connect.
> The problem is that when I surf the internet, I can not view a lot of
> web sites. It said "don't know my host name". ( I don't have this
> problem when I have a normal dynamic ip dial up). This is the first=20
time
> I get a dedicated with static IP. So I don't know what I need to do=20
with
> static IP.
> Other hand, I use to free DNS server at granitecanyon.com to point to =
my
> new static IP. Do I need to put their DNS server IP numbers in my
> resolv.conf ?
> Could some one have experiences with masquerade and static IP please
> show me how to configure my server!
> (My other computers (192.168.1.x) connect to internet via my server=20
with
> its IP 192.168.1.1)
> Thank you very much !!
> QCT
nslookup your_ip
If it cannot resolve your name there is a problem with your ISP's DNS=20
(and your free DNS is not working).
If it does come up with a name, change the hostname of your machine to=20
match it.
------------------------------
From: "donoli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix,comp.security.misc
Subject: Re: Am I under netbios and httpsd (on Linux) attack?
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:00:38 -0000
snip
My guess is that it's one attacker who has a Windows and Linux. That would
explain your port scan only showing 137 and 139 opened. Then when you found
port 25 on Linux opened which is a default setting, he happened to be on
Linux when he was probing your server.
NetBios is about the easiest exploit out there as far as hacking a windows
machine but I never heard of it used against a Linux server.
Continue to run the dump. See if the probes always come from the same IP or
subnet. Warn the attacker again if you catch him on the Linux box again.
If it still continues after that then either report him to his ISP or return
the fire. It's your choice. Donoli.
------------------------------
From: Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: POP3
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:40:58 GMT
Don Stafford wrote:
>
> I have just setup my Linux server
> How do I get the POP server to work
> I can send mail to the Linux box, but I cannot retrieve it
>
>
In the file /etc/inetd.conf uncomment the pop3 line. Make sure too that
/etc/hosts.allow lets remote machines in (see "man tcpd"). Then run
"killall -HUP inetd" to reset in internet server. You should be able to
POP3 from Linux now.
HTH,
-Matt
--
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--------- Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY ---------+
+--------- TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 ------------+
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.security.firewalls
Subject: Having trouble with simple filtering firewall on Linux...help(!)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:23:15 GMT
I have a NT network with 8 servers, and currently do not have a firewall.
I just loaded up a linux server with two network cards to serve as the
firewall.
Both network cards in the linux box respod to pings, so I have networking set
up just fine. Now, I want to install this firewall _without_ changing any of
the IP addresses on the NT machines on the inside. I realize that I will
have to change the default gateway that my ISP has given me on these machines
to the IP of the inside NIC on the firewall, and I also realize i may need to
tell my ISP to set up a next hop route in their routers, but that is fine.
Here is my problem.
I have addresses .32 - .64 (.33 - .63 usable). Now, my ISP told me .33 is
the default gateway, and I assume this is a cisco router. So, when I set up
the firewall, .55 and .56 were unused IPs on my block, so I gave the OUTSIDE
nic .55, and I gave the INSIDE nic .56 So far so good. then, I just plugged
both of these nics into a hub with all the rest of my machines on it, and i
was able to ping both .55 and .56. But then, I unplugged the .56 card, and
then tried to ping .56 - it seems to me that if I have ip forwarding turned
on, I should still be able to ping .56, even though it isn't plugged into the
hub. But I can't.
I went to /proc/net on my linux redhat 5.1 installation, and there _is_ a
file called 'ip_forward'. I was told to 'echo 1 > ip_forward' - but this did
not fix the fact that i could not ping .56 when it was not plugged in.
Now, I am all ready to move forward - I have researched and set up all of the
ipfwadm rules that I want on this simple filtering firewall, but I STILL need
to actually take it off the hub and put it between the gateway that my ISP
has and my local network. And I can't do this unless IP forwarding is turned
on.
1. how do i get ip forwarding on? Is the test I am performing (pinging a card
that isn't plugged in 'through' the card that is) a good test of whether ip
forwarding is working the way it should for a filtering firewall?
2. both nic 1 and nic 2 have addresses that are part of my normal address
block, and they also have .33 as the gateway, just like the machines I have
now do. Is this right? or should .56 have a gateway of .55 and only .55
should have the old gateway of .33 ???
3. is the only thing I need to do on the internal machines to change the
gateway from .33 to .56 ??
4. is it necessary to set up a next hop route from .33 to .55 ?
Am I missing anything? I am trying to make this as simple as possible by
just throwing a filter in and then applying ipfwadm rules. I think I just
need to get ip forwarding working and then change the gateway of all the
machines on my internal net to .56 - but maybe i also need to change the
gateway of .56 to something besides .33 ...
Any help is appreciated - please make sure replies go to the newsgroup _and_
my email address
-lt
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: help: ftp daemon for ftp accounts???
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 21:21:07 GMT
Is there a Linux ftp daemon that will allow me to set up ftp accounts that
will NOT show up in /etc/passwd? I want to allow clients to ftp but NOT give
them entries in /etc/passwd.
Thanks, Dave
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Horwath)
Subject: Re: PPP Setup for Uswest.net Dial in
Crossposted-To: mn.online-service
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 04:45:24 GMT
In mn.online-service Jeffrey S. Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I agree....
: GET A REAL ISP and hack off with these ISP wannabe's
Evangelists...
:)
--
Mike Horwath Admin & Manager @ VISI.com WORK: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IRC: Drechsau http://www.visi.com/ HOME: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only Minnesota ISP with public statistics: http://noc.visi.com/
Garbage In -- Gospel Out. - berkeley fortune(6)
------------------------------
From: Darren Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 2 Linux machines 2 nics and a hub and something is wrong?
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 20:50:12 GMT
Yes, the hosts file on both sides are identical.
graywolf wrote:
> Darren Ford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> :
> : These machines are both connected to hub. I cannot ping one machine
> : from the other but they can ping themselves and their dummy interface.
> :
> : If I want M1 to be a gateway later on, setting the gateway IP to
> : 192.168.9.1 is correct right?
> :
> : Why can't these guys ping each other? I tried adding each of them to
> : the others routing table but that didn't work or I didn't do it right.
> : When I do a 'route -n' it shows that the entry is there.
> :
>
> Reading this thread, Darren, I see that you have your /etc/hosts
> files, but do you have both computers in both host files? Without
> a nameserver the system looks in it's own /etc/hosts to find out the
> address of the other computer, it doesn't look across the net for
> it. If you knew this then the problem is something else.
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dark Knight)
Subject: Re: My Stupid little routing tutorial - Works for me (HTML File - I hope) -
mslrt.htm (0/1)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 20:28:08 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:36:46 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dark Knight)
wrote:
>
>I am a idiot. But I figured it out
>
>
>Here it is just the facts.
>
>
>
>Comments welcome help encouraged.
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: Routing questios
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:35:41 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi) writes:
[...]
>Which means that if you follow the Microsoft way, you will have to set up
>an NT server.
No.
>There may be a way to set up the Linux box to forward the broadcast
>packets between the two subnets (kink of defeats the purpose of a router,
>though) so that there is only one segment master browser.
Yes. It is called SAMBA, and it will not only serve NetBIOS requests
but do password authentiation, file sharing etc. .
>Just to be complete, you could use the LMHOSTS file and set up the
>mappings statically.
[...]
With SAMBA, it will be one central /etc/lmhosts file.
Note: All Win95/98 PCs will have to default to using TCP/IP as
the only installed protocol to allow NetBIOS over TCP/IP .
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't mungle your address.
------------------------------
From: Colin Guillas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP: pppd drops after exactly 1 hour - (long)
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 21:37:04 -0500
Hmmm... my guess is that if you are leaving yourself on the network 24/7, your
ISP logs out idle users after 1 hour... are you using the PPP connection when
you are logged out, or is it after one hour of inattentiveness? If it is
because you are idle, make sure that it is OK with your ISP to be on 24/7 (he
pays for the phone line at his end, remember, so your $20/month unlimited access
is a $20 phone bill for him) and if it is (rare) then in /etc/crontab , or
whatever is configured for your system, a single ping to your gateway or other
stable server every half hour should keep you online. Again, though, I stress
that you talk to your ISP if you wish to remain connected at all times... they
can boot you off the server if they want to, I know people that it has happened
to.
Paul Hanson wrote:
>
> I have a static IP using and am using ppp to connect to my ISP. Connects
> great, and have the option to redial on disconnect and dial on boot
> configured... but... Every hour exactly (determined from /var/log/messages)
> ppp goes down, and the connection redials and connects. Not only a bit
> irritating, but expensive also at $0.06 per call works out to about $43 a
> month based on a 24/7 up connection.
>
> Where do I look to correct this glitch? (doesn't look like anything is in
> cron)
>
> Running Redhat 5.2.
>
> Excerpt from /var/log/messages:
>
> Jan 25 04:00:25 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 04:00:56 sparky pppd[5558]: LCP terminated by peer
> Jan 25 04:00:56 sparky pppd[5558]: Modem hangup
> Jan 25 04:00:56 sparky pppd[5558]: Connection terminated.
> Jan 25 04:00:56 sparky pppd[5558]: Exit.
> Jan 25 04:00:58 sparky ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp1 on /dev/cua1 at
> 115200
> Jan 25 04:00:58 sparky pppd[6928]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: abort on (BUSY)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: abort on (ERROR)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: abort on (Invalid Login)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: abort on (Login incorrect)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: send (ATZ^M)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: abort on (Login incorrect)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: send (ATZ^M)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: expect (OK)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: ATZ^M^M
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: OK
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: -- got it
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: send (ATDT1234567^M)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: expect (CONNECT)
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky chat[6930]: ^M
> Jan 25 04:01:00 sparky PAM_pwdb[6934]: (su) session opened for user news by
> (uid=9)
> Jan 25 04:01:01 sparky PAM_pwdb[6934]: (su) session closed for user news
> Jan 25 04:01:20 sparky chat[6930]: ATDT1234567^M^M
> Jan 25 04:01:20 sparky chat[6930]: CONNECT
> Jan 25 04:01:20 sparky chat[6930]: -- got it
> Jan 25 04:01:20 sparky chat[6930]: send (^M)
> Jan 25 04:01:20 sparky chat[6930]: expect (ogin:)
> Jan 25 04:01:20 sparky chat[6930]: 115200^M
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: ^M
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: ^M
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: login:
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: -- got it
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: send (XXXXXX^M)
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: -- got it
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: send (XXXXXX^M)
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: expect (ord:)
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: XXXXXX^M
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: Password:
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: -- got it
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: send (XXXXXXX^M)
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: timeout set to 5 seconds
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: expect (~)
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: ^M
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: PPP session from (207.250.91.151) to
> 207.250.***.*** beginning....~
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: -- got it
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky chat[6930]: send (^M)
> Jan 25 04:01:22 sparky pppd[6928]: Serial connection established.
> Jan 25 04:01:23 sparky pppd[6928]: Using interface ppp0
> Jan 25 04:01:23 sparky pppd[6928]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua1
> Jan 25 04:01:26 sparky pppd[6928]: local IP address 207.250.***.***
> Jan 25 04:01:26 sparky pppd[6928]: remote IP address 207.250.***.***
> Jan 25 04:02:00 sparky PAM_pwdb[6997]: (su) session opened for user news by
> (uid
> =9)
> Jan 25 04:02:02 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 04:02:02 sparky innd[430]: j:
> Jan 25 04:02:02 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 04:02:02 sparky innd[430]: j:
> Jan 25 04:02:33 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 04:02:33 sparky innd[430]: z:Expiring process 7068
> Jan 25 04:02:34 sparky innd[430]: m:Expiring process 7068
> Jan 25 04:02:34 sparky innd[430]: SERVER paused Expiring process 7068
> Jan 25 04:02:34 sparky innd[430]: z:
> Jan 25 04:02:34 sparky innd[430]: h:Expiring process 7068
> Jan 25 04:02:35 sparky innd[430]: SERVER running
> Jan 25 04:02:36 sparky innd[430]: E
> Jan 25 04:02:36 sparky innd[430]: SERVER servermode running
> Jan 25 04:02:36 sparky innd[430]: m:Flushing log and syslog files
> Jan 25 04:02:36 sparky innd[430]: SERVER paused Flushing log and syslog
> files
> Jan 25 04:02:36 sparky innd[430]: g
> Jan 25 04:02:36 sparky innd[430]: SERVER flushlogs paused
> Jan 25 04:02:37 sparky innd[430]: E
> Jan 25 04:02:37 sparky innd[430]: SERVER servermode paused
> Jan 25 04:02:38 sparky innd[430]: h:Flushing log and syslog files
> Jan 25 04:02:38 sparky innd[430]: SERVER running
> Jan 25 04:02:47 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 04:02:48 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 04:02:48 sparky innd[430]: j:
> Jan 25 04:02:49 sparky innd[430]: n:
> Jan 25 04:02:48 sparky innd[430]: j:
> Jan 25 04:02:49 sparky innd[430]: n:
> Jan 25 04:02:50 sparky innd[430]: Pre-commit cache initialized: 4096
> entries, 32768 bytes
> Jan 25 04:02:50 sparky innd[430]: localhost connected 15
> Jan 25 04:02:50 sparky innd[430]: localhost:15 closed seconds 0 accepted 0
> refused 0 rejected 0
> Jan 25 04:02:50 sparky PAM_pwdb[6997]: (su) session closed for user news
> Jan 25 04:02:51 sparky innd[430]: localhost connected 15
> Jan 25 04:02:51 sparky innd[430]: localhost:15 closed seconds 0 accepted 0
> refused 0 rejected 0
> Jan 25 04:02:53 sparky PAM_pwdb[7527]: (su) session opened for user nobody
> by (uid=99)
> Jan 25 04:04:33 sparky PAM_pwdb[7527]: (su) session closed for user nobody
> Jan 25 04:07:09 sparky innfeed[443]: decwrl checkpoint seconds 16800 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:07:09 sparky innfeed[443]: uunet checkpoint seconds 16800 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:07:51 sparky innd[430]: ME time 450150 idle 447315(22) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(8)
> Jan 25 04:09:02 sparky named[1670]: Cleaned cache of 4 RRs
> Jan 25 04:09:02 sparky named[1670]: USAGE 917258942 917244542
> CPU=0.04u/0.02s CHILDCPU=0u/0s
> Jan 25 04:09:02 sparky named[1670]: Cleaned cache of 4 RRs
> Jan 25 04:09:02 sparky named[1670]: USAGE 917258942 917244542
> CPU=0.04u/0.02s CHILDCPU=0u/0s
> Jan 25 04:09:02 sparky named[1670]: NSTATS 917258942 917244542 A=29 PTR=3
> MX=1 ANY=4
> Jan 25 04:09:02 sparky named[1670]: XSTATS 917258942 917244542 RR=37 RNXD=17
> RFwdR=27 RDupR=0 RFail=0 RFErr=0 RErr=0 RAXFR=0 RLame=3 ROpts=0 SSysQ=6
> SAns=16 SFwdQ=21 SDupQ=4 SErr=0 RQ=37 RIQ=0 RFwdQ=0 RDupQ=0 RTCP=0 SFwdR=27
> SFail=0 SFErr=0 SNaAns=3 SNXD=8
> Jan 25 04:10:30 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 04:15:31 sparky innd[430]: ME time 459800 idle 459795(2) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(2)
> Jan 25 04:17:09 sparky innfeed[443]: decwrl checkpoint seconds 17400 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:17:09 sparky innfeed[443]: uunet checkpoint seconds 17400 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:20:31 sparky innd[430]: ME time 300010 idle 300008(1) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(2)
> Jan 25 04:20:36 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 04:25:36 sparky innd[430]: ME time 305270 idle 305265(2) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(2)
> Jan 25 04:27:09 sparky innfeed[443]: decwrl checkpoint seconds 18000 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:25:36 sparky innd[430]: ME time 305270 idle 305265(2) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(2)
> Jan 25 04:27:09 sparky innfeed[443]: decwrl checkpoint seconds 18000 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:27:09 sparky innfeed[443]: uunet checkpoint seconds 18000 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:30:36 sparky innd[430]: ME time 300010 idle 300008(1) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(1)
> Jan 25 04:30:41 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 04:30:43 sparky named[1670]: Lame server on
> 'news1.pa.dec.com.gab.***.net' (in '***.NET'?): [207.250.***.**].53
> 'gab.***.net'
> Jan 25 04:30:43 sparky innfeed[443]: decwrl can't resolve hostname:
> news1.pa.dec.com : (Unknown host)
> Jan 25 04:30:48 sparky innfeed[443]: uunet can't resolve hostname:
> news.uunet.uu.net : (Unknown host)
> Jan 25 04:35:41 sparky innd[430]: ME time 304910 idle 304905(2) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(2)
> Jan 25 04:37:09 sparky innfeed[443]: decwrl checkpoint seconds 18600 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:37:09 sparky innfeed[443]: uunet checkpoint seconds 18600 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:40:41 sparky innd[430]: ME time 300010 idle 300008(1) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(2)
> Jan 25 04:37:09 sparky innfeed[443]: uunet checkpoint seconds 18600 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:40:41 sparky innd[430]: ME time 300010 idle 300008(1) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(2)
> Jan 25 04:40:46 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 04:45:46 sparky innd[430]: ME time 304950 idle 304947(2) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(2)
> Jan 25 04:47:09 sparky innfeed[443]: decwrl checkpoint seconds 19200 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:47:09 sparky innfeed[443]: uunet checkpoint seconds 19200 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:50:46 sparky innd[430]: ME time 300010 idle 300008(1) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 1(1)
> Jan 25 04:50:51 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 04:55:51 sparky innd[430]: ME time 304910 idle 304906(2) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(2)
> Jan 25 04:57:09 sparky innfeed[443]: decwrl checkpoint seconds 19800 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 04:57:09 sparky innfeed[443]: uunet checkpoint seconds 19800 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 05:00:51 sparky innd[430]: ME time 300010 idle 300008(1) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 1(2)
> Jan 25 05:00:55 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 05:00:51 sparky innd[430]: ME time 300010 idle 300008(1) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 1(2)
> Jan 25 05:00:55 sparky innd[430]: s
> Jan 25 05:00:56 sparky pppd[6928]: LCP terminated by peer
> Jan 25 05:00:56 sparky pppd[6928]: Modem hangup
> Jan 25 05:00:56 sparky pppd[6928]: Connection terminated.
> Jan 25 05:00:57 sparky pppd[6928]: Exit.
> Jan 25 05:00:59 sparky ifup-ppp: pppd started for ppp1 on /dev/cua1 at
> 115200
> Jan 25 05:00:59 sparky pppd[8790]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky PAM_pwdb[8822]: (su) session opened for user news by
> (uid
> =9)
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: abort on (BUSY)
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: abort on (ERROR)
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: abort on (Invalid Login)
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: abort on (Login incorrect)
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: send (ATZ^M)
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: expect (OK)
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: ATZ^M^M
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: OK
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: -- got it
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: send (ATDT1234567^M)
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: -- got it
> Jan 25 05:01:00 sparky chat[8831]: send (ATDT1234567^M)
> Jan 25 05:01:01 sparky chat[8831]: expect (CONNECT)
> Jan 25 05:01:01 sparky chat[8831]: ^M
> Jan 25 05:01:02 sparky PAM_pwdb[8822]: (su) session closed for user news
> Jan 25 05:01:21 sparky chat[8831]: ATDT1234567^M^M
> Jan 25 05:01:21 sparky chat[8831]: CONNECT
> Jan 25 05:01:21 sparky chat[8831]: -- got it
> Jan 25 05:01:21 sparky chat[8831]: send (^M)
> Jan 25 05:01:21 sparky chat[8831]: expect (ogin:)
> Jan 25 05:01:21 sparky chat[8831]: 115200^M
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: ^M
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: ^M
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: login:
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: -- got it
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: send (XXXXXX^M)
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: expect (ord:)
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: XXXXXX^M
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: Password:
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: -- got it
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: send (XXXXXXX^M)
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: timeout set to 5 seconds
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: expect (~)
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: timeout set to 5 seconds
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: expect (~)
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: ^M
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky pppd[8790]: Serial connection established.
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: PPP session from (207.250.***.**) to
> 207.250.***.*** beginning....~
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: -- got it
> Jan 25 05:01:23 sparky chat[8831]: send (^M)
> Jan 25 05:01:24 sparky pppd[8790]: Using interface ppp0
> Jan 25 05:01:24 sparky pppd[8790]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua1
> Jan 25 05:01:27 sparky pppd[8790]: local IP address 207.250.***.***
> Jan 25 05:01:27 sparky pppd[8790]: remote IP address 207.250.***.***
> Jan 25 05:05:56 sparky innd[430]: ME time 304910 idle 304906(2) artwrite
> 0(0) artlink 0(0) hiswrite 0(0) hissync 0(2)
> Jan 25 05:07:09 sparky innfeed[443]: decwrl checkpoint seconds 20400 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 05:07:09 sparky innfeed[443]: uunet checkpoint seconds 20400 spooled
> 0 on_close 0 sleeping 0
> Jan 25 05:09:02 sparky named[1670]: Cleaned cache of 16 RRs
> Jan 25 05:09:02 sparky named[1670]: USAGE 917262542 917244542
> CPU=0.04u/0.02s CHILDCPU=0u/0s
>
> please reply via email as wee as post:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
+----------------------------------------------------+
| Colin Guillas Ringmaster For Commodore Ring |
| http://welcome.to/cbmring [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
+----| ICQ#: 19683759 |-----| Ham Radio: VA3CSG |----+
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
