Linux-Networking Digest #40, Volume #10 Fri, 29 Jan 99 05:13:47 EST
Contents:
Re: DynIp and Linux ("Christopher G. Petty")
Re: DNS nameserver problem... ("Christopher G. Petty")
Re: masquerading: what's left for me to do? ("Michael 'BeLFrY' S. E. Kraus")
Re: I know it's been asked a million times... (Arthur Corliss)
Re: Windows login to corporate domain thru Linux server ("Martin
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Wahlstr=F6m?=")
Re: Connect to Netware 5 server? How To? ("Fred Barber")
Re: PAP problem Please Help!! (Partha Sri)
Cable modems, Dual NICs, and Newbies ("J. Patrick Cline")
Re: masquerading: what's left for me to do? ("Michael 'BeLFrY' S. E. Kraus")
demand dialling (chapter 2) (Juergen Fiedler)
Re: Help, ISP setup! (Kalevi Hautaniemi)
DHCP Server setup - Complete rookie need help please ("GV Morgon")
Re: Printing to HP DeskWriter 560C (Charles Mosher)
connecting to Netware (Jimmy Blair)
PPPD Problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Christopher G. Petty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DynIp and Linux
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:56:19 -0500
Try putting the call to the program in ip-up.local and making the requisite
changes in ip-up? It'll call the script every time you redial.. no more manual
updates.
_CGP
Rob wrote:
> Yeah i have it working fine too, and i rarely re-boot the box or lose
> connection so its not that big of a deal, I just always forget to run it if
> I re-boot and wind up wondering why I cant see my machine from outside
> Someone has to have a script that works to load it automatically on boot.
>
> Benjohn007 wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >i have it working, but i dont have any scripts that activate the program on
> >boot, when the ppp connection is made i just run dynipadmin and
> dynipclient.,
> >for me i just leave my linux box on, and whenever ppp fails (usually 3-4
> days)
> >i have it set to redial automatically and dynipclient(which always runs)
> gets
> >the correct ip of the machine and forwards it to dynip server.
------------------------------
From: "Christopher G. Petty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS nameserver problem...
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 01:36:48 -0500
Heiko:
One quick question, and then I'll get out of your hair..
Are you using NetBEUI on the Winbox? NetBEUI can sometimes cause problems
with DoD setups as you have... Take NetBEUI off the Winbox and see if it
still does it.
Other culprits:
ICQ Notify/ICQ
Netscape AOL IM'er
Mail clients
Check and see if any of this is on your Winbox, and remove it if it is...
your dialup woes should be over..
Oh, and put your DNS back the way it was...
_CGP
Heiko Gerstung wrote:
> Hi !
>
> I just installed an old 486 as my new internet router for my little
> lan. My main machine is a win95 system (shame on me) and I wanted to
> use this configuration as follows:
> - whenever I start my web browser or telnet client on my win95
> machine, the linux server should connect to the internet and after I
> closed my internet application on the win-machine, linux should
> disconnect.
>
> It worked fine ! No problem at all. Now my big, big problem is : It
> seems to me that the win95 systems queries a nameserver every couple
> of minutes (and I don't know which program to blame for this!), so
> when I configured my win95-machine with the dns of my provider, every
> couple of minutes my linux server connects to the internet and
> disconnects after some seconds. (with iptraf I found out that the
> win95 machine is really responsible for that!).
>
> My next step was to set up a cache-only dns on the linux machine in
> order to get rid of these nonsense connects. So I entered the IP of my
> linux machine as the dns server for the win95 system and tried to
> configure named as cache-only.
>
> The following phenomenon happened : Whenever I tried to use the
> nameserver (e.g. running netscape on my win95 machine and entering
> "www.xyz.com" as URL) I was able to monitor a request from my named to
> the nameserver of my provider (which I configured as a "forwarder" in
> named.boot), but the linux system tried to connect to this nameserver
> on the "sl0" device ! (I'm using ppp0 for my internet connection).
>
> Named starts with a line "cache zone "" loaded (serial 0)" in
> /var/log/message ...
>
> Any ideas ? Please send my your replies as an email, too !
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) !!
>
> Thank you very much !!!
>
> Bye,
> Heiko
>
> P.S.: I promise that I'll kick off that win95 machine ASAP ! :-)
------------------------------
From: "Michael 'BeLFrY' S. E. Kraus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: masquerading: what's left for me to do?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 03:35:05 +1100
G'day Brad and all,
> This is under slakware. In /etc/rc.d/rc.local, I put in
> these lines:
>
> echo "Setting up IP Masquerading..."
> /sbin/ipfwadm -F -p masquerade
Ok... This is really *not* recommended. You've just set it up so any host on the
internet can
masquerade as your host. (A *major* security hole!) (Heheh... and you've also just
advertised so in
the newsgroups.)
This is better (assuming that 192.168.1.0 is your masqueraded network):
echo "Setting up IP Masquerading..."
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -f
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
What the above does is:
1. flush all firewalling rules (just to be on the safe side).
2. Sets the default policy to deny.
3. Opens up the firewall/masquerading so that your local network may masquerade to
anywhere.
I suggest you apply these changes immediately... =)
All the best.
Michael.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Arthur Corliss)
Subject: Re: I know it's been asked a million times...
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 28 Jan 1999 22:34:53 -0900
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:12:25 -0500, Jay Copeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We have two linux boxes in our house. The older one (defiant) is a 486
>66 with all kinds of dead parts with hardware workarounds. It works. I
>can surf or whatever I want to do when I have a phone line plugged in.
>The newer one (voyager) is an AMD 233. It's great. It's fast enough for
>what we want to do.
>
>I have been trying for about a week to get IP Masquing (sp?) to work.
>I've recompiled the kernel on what will be the gateway. I've followed
>the mini-HOWTO to the letter. I still haven't been able to get it to
>work.
>
>The two machines work fine together. We share files, doom, whatever
>else. I just can't get to the internet unless I telnet into the gateway.
>That's fine if I just want to use lynx. I can't use Netscape or its
>e-mail client. I can't irc (not that it's important). What else do I
>need to do?
Actually, if you just do remote X sessions, you could accomplish the same
thing, without masquerading. It's also nice if you're backing up the
gateway/server on to tape regularly, and not the workstation.
--Arthur Corliss
Bolverk's Lair -- http://www.odinicfoundation.org/arthur/
"Live Free or Die, the Only Way to Live" -- NH State Motto
------------------------------
From: "Martin =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wahlstr=F6m?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Windows login to corporate domain thru Linux server
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 08:16:26 +0100
I had the same problem.
My Windows95 users could not log on to the NT domain when connected by PPP
to the modems
at the Linux box.
After updating MSDun to version 1.2(?) it just worked!! (By now i think
ther is a 1.3 version)
Look for it at M$ www.
(I also updated the TCP/IP packages from M$)
My windows 98 user didn't have this problem.
I also have some IP-forwarding/aliasing enabled at the Linux.
Hope this helps..
Martin/
Christopher G. Petty wrote:
> Here's one for the thinkers out there. I'll admit I'm stumped on this
> one.
>
> I'm trying to allow remote windows users to login to my local LAN vial a
> DoD Linux box. The problem is that the domain information refuses to
> pass thru the PPP link. Services such as Micro$loth Exchange, Mail, etc
> are not seen, nor are the machines on the other side of the PPP link.
>
> I can ping both ways across the PPP link, so routing is not the issue.
> The Linux server at the remote site is dialing into an NT 4 SP4 server.
> When the link is up, I can ping the remote workstations, the remote
> linux box, telnet to the remote linux box, and thru it, ping both remote
> and local machines, but none of the NT domain information is being
> passed.
>
> Anyone got a clue on how I can get this to work?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> _CGP
==================================================
This is just my opinion and has nothing to do
with the company named "Ericsson"
Email: Martin . Wahlstrom @ uab . ericsson . se
==================================================
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Fred Barber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Fred Barber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Connect to Netware 5 server? How To?
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:09:25 -0500
jmcknight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>I have a Netware 5 server ( I wish I had spent the money on more
>hardware to run Linux :) that I would like to access from my Linux box.
>Is there a How-To on that anywhere? I havent seen anything and the only
>thing I have seen on netware is about IPX.
>
>tia,
>
>Jason McKnight
>
Jason,
Check out ftp://sunsite.unc.edu/pub/Linux/system/filesystems/ncpfs/ncpfs.tgz
So far it works great for me...
Fred
SRS
------------------------------
From: Partha Sri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PAP problem Please Help!!
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:03:53 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clifford Kite wrote:
> Good, simple I can handle, obsfucated I can't.
>
;-)
>
> I have no recommendation except to say that an external is probably worth
> the extra cost. I, of course, use an internal :X but while it serves me
> fairly well, no recommendation.
Well I currently have a USR 56K V.90 external and am not able to get it to
work. And I used to
have an internal modem and working fine too..
>
> This isn't your current problem but unless you really need for the ISP to
> authenticate itself to *you*, you had better remove +pap. Read "man pppd".
>
OK.. did that
> I would use 206.158.123.179: rather than specifing 0.0.0.0 . You may
> need the pppd option ipcp-accept-remote if you choose not to follow
> this advice.
>
Did that also.
>
> Here is your problem. Note that the time between when ATZ is sent
> to the modem and the time the modem responds with OK is 19 seconds.
>
> This difference should be no more than 1 second, and means that your
> Linux setup does not configure the serial port for the same IRQ that the
> modem actually uses. Configuration is done in a boot-up script with
> setserial, "man setserial".
>
> I changed the IRQ from 3 to 4 and this was fixed.
> This doubling is strange, but it could be echoing caused by a modem
> setting or a side-effect of using the wrong IRQ. Check the modem settings
> with AT&V and shut off echoing if it is present (ATF1 ?).
>
> Didnt do this.. ;-). yet
>
> This means that the ppp negotiations never really got started due to the
> misconfigured IRQ..
After the IRQ change, there is some progress though. I am able to get a connect
using minicom. pppd still dies the same way.. but with minicom after the connect,
all the characters i get are garbled up and illegible. Does this mean a I/O port
conflict. I am currently using 0x2e8. How do I find out the right I/O port to use
besides the BIOS setup??
Thanks a lot for your help.
Partha
------------------------------
From: "J. Patrick Cline" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Cable modems, Dual NICs, and Newbies
Date: 29 Jan 1999 03:44:54 GMT
I would like to set up my Linux box as a proxy for my internal network. The
cable modem will be connected to the Linux box via a NIC, and there will be
a second NIC connected to my internal (192.168.0.0) network. Is there a good
FAQ or set of instructions on _exactly_ how to configure this? I suppose I
really need to know:
1) How to configure dual NICs.
2) How to use IP masquerading with this configuration.
Thanks for your help,
Patrick
------------------------------
From: "Michael 'BeLFrY' S. E. Kraus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: masquerading: what's left for me to do?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 04:10:34 +1100
G'day...
> I issued
> ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/24
> (and variants thereof),
> so that an ipfwadm -f -l yielded, IIRC:
> acc/m 192.168.1.0 anywhere n/a
> And after all this (which was nowhere as easy
> as I'm making it sound) my win98 machine
> still can't reach the outside world.
I assume you meant 'ipfwadm -F -l' =)
Mine produces:
type prot source destination ports
acc/m all 192.168.1.0/24 anywhere n/a
(only slightly nicer formatted in regards to whitespace)
So, from my gatherings your IP masquerading sounds like it should be working.
A couple of reasons it may not be working are:
1. You haven't done a "echo 1 > /proc/net/ip_forward" (Under RH make sure that in
/etc/sysconfig/network the line 'FORWARD_IPV4=true' is there.)
2. Your routing tables are incorrectly set up on your Linux box doing the forwarding.
3. Your windows box routing is setup incorrectly. - Make sure that the linux box is
set as both the
gateway and the nameserver.
For a great deal of help with IP-Masquerading check out http://ipmasq.cjb.net/
All the best.
Michael.
------------------------------
From: Juergen Fiedler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: demand dialling (chapter 2)
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 12:03:06 -0500
Hello,
Thanks to you guys,I finally got dial-on-demand with ppp-2.3.5 working -
on my machine. The problem is that I'm using IP masquerading on our LAN,
and that's far from functional. In fact, as soon as I start pppd with my
demand configuration, nobody is able to connect to the Linux box anymore:
No ping, no telnet, no nothing.
Here's what my ppp/options file looks like:
>-------SNIP-------<
lock
defaultroute
noipdefault
modem
/dev/ttyS1
57600
crtscts
debug
passive
asyncmap 0
name "fiedler"
ipcp-accept-local
ipcp-accept-remote
0.0.0.0:10.10.10.10
demand
connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/ppp/pppscript"
>-------SNIP-------<
After booting the Linux box fresh, before starting pppd, the routing table
looks like this:
>-------SNIP-------<
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 7 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo
>-------SNIP-------<
After starting pppd with the above configuration file, it looks like that:
>-------SNIP-------<
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
10.10.10.10 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 8 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo
0.0.0.0 10.10.10.10 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0
>-------SNIP-------<
At this stage, nothing works on the LAN.
After connecting to the net (usually by issung a 'ping www.somewhere.net'
on the Linux machine), it looks like this:
>-------SNIP-------<
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
207.207.199.27 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 11 eth0
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo
0.0.0.0 207.207.199.27 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 5 ppp0
>-------SNIP-------<
I guess I have to find a smart replacement for the '0.0.0.0:10.10.10.10'
line in my options file. I already tried the address of the Linux box and
the broadcast address - but nothing seemed to work.
Could someone please help me out here?
TIA,
Juergen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kalevi Hautaniemi)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.protocols.ppp,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.ibmpc
Subject: Re: Help, ISP setup!
Date: 29 Jan 1999 07:22:58 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
William Gross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hello,
: I need some help, please. I am running RedHat 5.2 on a a clone pc,
: and I am trying to connect to my ISP which is called Integrity Online.
To help us to find out what's wrong, please post the output of 'route -n'
and 'ifconfig' commands while your unusable link is up.
Kalevi
--
Kalevi J Hautaniemi, Kovajankatu 5, 33530 Tampere, FINLAND.
**** http://oh3tr.ele.tut.fi/~oh3fg/ **** On air: OH3FG, KO4BC ****
tel:+358-3-364-7446 mobile:+358-50-590-2243 or +358-50-033-5447
------------------------------
From: "GV Morgon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCP Server setup - Complete rookie need help please
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:27:59 -0800
First off, let me state that my Linux experience is basically zip, and I've
been "assigned" the task of deploying a DHCP server. I've gotten Redhat
5.2, kernel 2.0.36 installed onto a 486/66 8 meg RAM, 500Meg HDD. What I
need to know is what exactly do I have to do to get this machine to act as a
DHCP server for Windows 95/98/NT clients operating on a network shared with
Netware 4.11 servers? I checked out "man dhcpd" and it gave some
interresting info, but when I type "dhcpd" at the command prompt nothing
happens. "Command not found" error. When I look in the /sbin directory
there is no dhcpd program, but when I installed under the RedHat program, I
told it to install the dhcp daemon. So where did it go? Did it not
install? According to the printed install manual from RedHat the dhcp
daemon is version 2.0b1pl6. I noticed that in the /sbin directory the
dhcpcd program is in there, but when I type "dhcpcd" at the prompt, I get a
"Command not found" error. For that matter I cant even get the games to
load . I understand that Linux is case sensitive, but I can't get any of
the programs to execute.
The game plan here is to put to use these old 486 machines we have as DHCP
servers instead of tossing into the dumpster. Currently we are using
Windows NT 4 server on Toshiba 440 and 490 laptops to simply act as a DHCP
server at various office locations. Waste of perfectly good laptops for
such a mediocre task. For some corporate reason, using the DHCP server
capabilites of the routers is not an option (a different department manages
them and refuses to allow it).
While I am well seasoned at dealing with NT machines, I have no
configuration experience with Linux machines. Recompiling the kernel was
something that never came to my mind in the past in dealing with NT
machines. But I like the idea of having that capability to expedite the
time it takes to deploy security and bug fixes. But if I can't get a game
to even run under Linux when I'm looking at the file in front of me, I
wonder how badly I can screw up a recompile :)
As an aside, the GUI for Novell 5 and Xwindows sure do look a lot
alike...although Xwindows is infinitely faster :)
I would like to extend some thank you's in advance to all who help me on
this.
Glenn V. Morgon
------------------------------
From: Charles Mosher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Printing to HP DeskWriter 560C
Date: 29 Jan 1999 08:41:46 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Scott Nielson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
: I have been using the cdj550 device in ghostscript 4.30 to print to a HP
: DeskWriter 560C. It works, but before the job and after each page I am
: getting an extra sheet with one line on it. The line will say something
: like: "gnu ghostscript 4.30" or "Page 1" or "Last Page".
: Am I using the right ghostscript device? Or, is there a better one?
Reply by email also.
You are probably just trying to print a longer page than the printer can
physically fit on one sheet of paper. I had the same problem in DOS 6.20,
WordStar 7D and a 520. Try a shorter top margin, and a bigger bottom
margin. This was a medium PITA.
The first blank sheet may be just making sure the previous job is
physically cleared from the printer.
--
Charles Mosher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Jimmy Blair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: connecting to Netware
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 02:47:36 -0600
hey everybody,
ok, i'm new to linux, but i'm learning fast. is there a program/way to
get linux to recognize novell netware 4.1 networks? specifically, i'm
at college and would like to be able to access my netware account that
has my web folder and my class folders. if this is possible, i think i
can spend 99% of my time in linux rather than 98! and that's pretty
exciting. also, i'm kinda looking for a no cost solution as i'm a poor
college student with too many student loans...;-)
anyway, thanks for your help
jimmy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carleton College
Northfield, MN --> home of "cows, colleges and contentment"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PPPD Problems
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 07:47:16 GMT
Unfortunately, I have a problem. I upgraded to the new kernel, 2.2.0, and now
for some reason the command `df` doesn't work. It gives the following output:
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
df: filesystems.: No such file or directory
df: fsck: No such file or directory
df: all: No such file or directory
df: : No such file or directory
df: local: No such file or directory
df: on: No such file or directory
df: clock: No such file or directory
df: swap: No such file or directory
df: random: No such file or directory
I am also trying to compile the newest version of PPPD (keyword is trying).
The version I grabbed is 2.3.5, and during compiling gives the following:
In file included from sys-linux.c:68: ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:97: parse
error before `ext_accm' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:97: warning: data
definition has no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:113:
parse error before `__u32' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:113: warning: no
semicolon at end of struct or union ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:115: warning:
data definition has no type or make[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/ppp-2.3.5/pppd' error before `ppp_ioctects'
../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:116: warning: data definition has no type or
storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:117: parse error before
`ppp_ipackets' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:117: warning: data definition has
no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:118: parse error before
`ppp_ierrors' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:118: warning: data definition has
no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:119: parse error before
`ppp_ilqrs' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:119: warning: data definition has no
type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:121: parse error before
`ppp_obytes' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:121: warning: data definition has no
type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:122: parse error before
`ppp_ooctects' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:122: warning: data definition has
no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:123: parse error before
`ppp_opackets' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:123: warning: data definition has
no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:124: parse error before
`ppp_oerrors' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:124: warning: data definition has
no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:125: parse error before
`ppp_olqrs' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:125: warning: data definition has no
type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:129: parse error before
`__u32' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:129: warning: no semicolon at end of
struct or union ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:130: warning: data definition has
no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:131: parse error before
`vjs_searches' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:131: warning: data definition has
no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:132: parse error before
`vjs_misses' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:132: warning: data definition has no
type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:133: parse error before
`vjs_uncompressedin' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:133: warning: data
definition has no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:134:
parse error before `vjs_compressedin' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:134:
warning: data definition has no type or storage class
../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:135: parse error before `vjs_errorin'
../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:135: warning: data definition has no type or
storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:136: parse error before
`vjs_tossed' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:136: warning: data definition has no
type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:140: parse error before
`__u32' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:140: warning: no semicolon at end of
struct or union ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:141: warning: data definition has
no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:142: parse error before
`comp_bytes' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:142: warning: data definition has no
type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:143: parse error before
`comp_packets' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:143: warning: data definition has
no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:144: parse error before
`inc_bytes' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:144: warning: data definition has no
type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:145: parse error before
`inc_packets' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:145: warning: data definition has
no type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:148: parse error before
`in_count' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:148: warning: data definition has no
type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:149: parse error before
`bytes_out' ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:149: warning: data definition has no
type or storage class ../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:152: parse error before `}'
../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:155: field `p' has incomplete type
../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:156: field `vj' has incomplete type
../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:160: field `c' has incomplete type
../include/linux/ppp_defs.h:161: field `d' has incomplete type In file
included from sys-linux.c:69: ../include/linux/if_ppp.h:92: parse error
before `__u8' ../include/linux/if_ppp.h:92: warning: no semicolon at end of
struct or union ../include/linux/if_ppp.h:93: warning: data definition has no
type or storage class ../include/linux/if_ppp.h:95: parse error before `}' In
file included from sys-linux.c:71: pppd.h:266: parse error before `ext_accm'
sys-linux.c:983: parse error before `ext_accm' sys-linux.c: In function
`ppp_set_xaccm': sys-linux.c:988: `accm' undeclared (first use this function)
sys-linux.c:988: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
sys-linux.c:988: for each function it appears in.) sys-linux.c: In function
`ccp_test': sys-linux.c:1047: storage size of `data' isn't known
sys-linux.c:1054: sizeof applied to an incomplete type sys-linux.c:1047:
warning: unused variable `data' make[1]: *** [sys-linux.o] Error 1 make: ***
[all] Error 2
Sorry for the lengthy message. Any ideas anyone? Thanks in advance!
Luke Reeves
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/LukeReeves/
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
