Linux-Networking Digest #55, Volume #10 Sat, 30 Jan 99 13:13:47 EST
Contents:
Re: GTE flamed linux for BillG (Nick Zentena)
Re: netware dislikes linux ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Sendmail as a gateway (David Jordan)
Re: can linux route appletalk over ppp connection? (Matt Kressel)
Re: PPP 2.3.5: Connect to ISP ok, but cannot ping gateway: bad packets (Matt Kressel)
Re: Problem with ethernet startup: SIOCSADDR etc... (Matt Kressel)
Monopoly Proprietarianism: Divided They Fall (Bob)
Re: How do I get my IP addresses in multiple NIC conf. (Lawrence Kirby)
Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM (Frank Sweetser)
Re: HELP! Linux Compatible Modems? (Bob)
Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist (David Kirkpatrick)
DE-528 (Devin Miller)
Weird networking behavior (it doesn't make sense) (help?) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
WANPIPE, X.25 and Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
d-link DFE-530 TX (Fredrik R Ingels)
Diskless PC setup?
Re: named: No response from Server (Juergen Heinzl)
help me APACHE 1.3.3 and DNS ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: swapon -s returning error (James Youngman)
Re: --Someone Please Help-- Network unreachable and No responce from server
errors... (James Youngman)
Re: Redhat 5.2's Samba + Windows 2000 Pro (build 1965) DOES NOT NETWORK ("Slam")
Re: Help! Need program to monitor network activity of all processes
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Starting a firewall script. (spivey)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Nick Zentena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: GTE flamed linux for BillG
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 10:01:14 -0500
Jim Harper wrote:
>
> I think the bigger problem is that places like GTE, and the like, do not
> want educated users on their systems. People who can install and run
> Linux are obviously educated and therefore persuaded to go somewhere
> else for service.
I think the real issue is support. The ISP service provided by our
local phone company basically tells you that you can use anything you
want. But don't expect support unless you are running one of the
supported OS [Win 95/98, Mac, NT]. So if you are having a problem with
the service better boot up windows before you call them. OTOH can't you
just tell GTE you are running windows? Are they going to keep tabs on
you?
Nick
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: netware dislikes linux ?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 17:23:56 GMT
You are probably deleting the IPX protocol for your ethernet device in the
w95 network setup and replacing it with tcp/ip. You need BOTH ipx->netcard
and tcp->netcard. They will coexist just fine. Leave the primary
login/client the Novell client and just add TCP protocol to your network
card.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christophe Zwecker) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just installed a linuxmachine into a novell network with win95
> clients. I can't reach linux from the clients, thy don't have an IP
> setup. A soon as I give them an IP (Windows Networksetup), I can see
> the linuxbox, but the netware login for the winclients is gone - no
> more shares , no more printers and so on.
>
> Does anyone have a hint for me how I can get linux and netware work
> together without theese glitches ? I appreciate any hint, dunno
> anythin about netware unfort.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: David Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail as a gateway
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 15:13:55 +0000
Stephen, do you have the internet mail connector? That should be able to
be set up to automatically receive SMTP mail ... all you should have to
do then is to set up a small dns server on the 'gateway' machine (Linux
is nice :-) and senmail will automatically forward any email that you
download from your ISP to the exchange machine ... you can add a few
lines to the sendmail.cf file if required.
David C Jordan.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Stephen J. Thompson" wrote:
>
> I have a home network which all masquerades through my linux box to
> the internet. I need to set up sendmail so that it can receive email
> from my isp (Demon UK) and hold them until my exchange box retrieves
> them on a different ip address.
>
> eg. I create a message in exchange, it then sends it to sendmail on
> eth0, ip address 192.168.1.1. Periodically, sendmail connects to the
> internet on ppp0 address 158.152.112.98 and sends this mail to my
> isp's mail server and retrieves new mail through SMTP (demon performs
> a type of polling). It then must hold it until exchange polls it and
> retrieves it.
>
> Can this be done?
>
> Can anyone point me in the right direction. I can not replace exchange
> just yet.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Stephen.
--
David Jordan
`fortune -s`
------------------------------
From: Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can linux route appletalk over ppp connection?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 17:49:00 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I have a linux box doing IP Masquerading for a 5 mac
> ethernet-appletalk network, to a ppp server.
>
> I would like to know if there is a way to have the linux
> machine dial out to an ARA server in our office, and give
> those 5 macs access to our file/print servers we have there.
>
> A quick yes or no would help me a lot. Any other information
> would be fantastic.
>
>
There was an article on http://www.slashdot.org about appletalk over ppp
that I read yesterday. I'm not sure if I understand you correctly, but
it can be done (appletalk over ppp). As to the 5 mac access, one of
them has to do routing to forward the packets to the Linux host, i.e.
they can't all share the PPP link unless the packets are routed over
that interface.
-Matt
--
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--------- Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY ---------+
+--------- TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 ------------+
------------------------------
From: Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP 2.3.5: Connect to ISP ok, but cannot ping gateway: bad packets
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 17:54:08 GMT
Stefan Huebner wrote:
>
> Hello !
>
> I have a problem getting pppd-2.3.5 to work. This prevents me from using
> newer kernels,
>
> I can connect to my ISP without problems, but afterwards I'm not able to
> ping the remote gateway. However I can see Transmit- and Receive-Lights of
> my Zyxel-ISDN-Modem flicker when doing a ping. The routing scheme is very
> simple, because I don't have another Network-Adapter installed. My
> ppp-options file is also very simple, defaultroute is enabled.
> I'm using kernel 2.2.0, glibc 2.0.7 and net-tools 1.50.
>
> Here's the output of some programs, I noticed that the transmitted packets
> are ok, but ifconfig shows 6 received packets ok but the following packets
> seem to have errors, see below:
>
> [stuff deleted]
When you see "bad fcs" it means that the PPP packet was corrupted
somehow. Usually this is due to bad flow control on the modem, or the
remote host trying to do something stupid/obsolete. Did you have the
same problems with earlier versions of pppd? What flow control options
are you using? Try disabling VJ header compression (ppp option) and see
if that helps.
-Matt
--
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--------- Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY ---------+
+--------- TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 ------------+
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
From: Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problem with ethernet startup: SIOCSADDR etc...
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 18:17:17 GMT
Ville Nummela wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Jan 1999, Matthew Callaway wrote:
>
> > I'm in the process of upgrading to the 2.2.0 kernel, and have stumbled upon
> > a puzzler I can't solve. For some reason, after compiling the kernel and
> > rebooting, the following error messages appear during the boot process.
>
> Funny though, I've had problems too after upgrading to 2.2.0; When I run
> ifconfig (or actually it's being run by my startup script..) I get some
> SIOCSADDR error. The funny part is that when I run it again, it runs
> perfectly without any errors. So, now I have two of those lines in my
> startup, but I've got to find the real problem some day too..
>
The networking code was slighly modified in the 2.2.x kernels (from
2.0.x). This breaks some net tools. You need to get the latest tools.
There is a list of what versions you need at:
http://www.linuxhq.com/change21.html
-Matt
--
Matthew O. Kressel | INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--------- Northrop Grumman Corporation, Bethpage, NY ---------+
+--------- TEL: (516) 346-9101 FAX: (516) 346-9740 ------------+
------------------------------
From: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Monopoly Proprietarianism: Divided They Fall
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:13:40 -0500
Bob wrote:
> Jim Harper wrote:
>
> > I think the bigger problem is that places like GTE, and the like, do not
> > want educated users on their systems.
McNealy Says Don't Buy PCs, Buy
Services
"The most ridiculous way to get information
is through a PC," declares Sun's CEO.
by Mary Lisbeth D'Amico, IDG News Service
January 28, 1999, 12:22 p.m. PT
Information systems departments, he said,
should hand over as many tasks as possible to
service providers. He recommended, for
example, that corporations shut down their e-mail
services
In fact, he said, companies should get everything
they can free over the Internet from service
providers--free news, free spreadsheets, free
presentation graphics--negating the need for
what he called a "four-way Pentium NT hairball"
to do all those things.
To meet the challenge, ISPs have to keep
services and content device-neutral and base all
services on Internet protocol, McNealy said.
*****Users should not have to use Windows*****
to view data or run services. The model for this vision
is one in which simple, reliable appliances--devices
such as a telephone--link users up to a network.
"You know how to boot up a telephone? You pick it up,"
he quipped.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lawrence Kirby)
Crossposted-To: comp.lang.tcl,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: How do I get my IP addresses in multiple NIC conf.
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 99 14:32:57 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "Vladimir Peric" writes:
>Lawrence Kirby wrote:
>
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Vladimir Peric" writes:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >is there any machine and OS independent way to get IP addresses in
>> >multiple NIC configuration without using host names ?
>>
>> There's machine and OS independent way to get *any* hardware related
>> information (except perhaps the system time).
>>
>
>Thanks.
>
>Please, can you say, what is the way to get IP addresses portable to all OS and
> hardware ?
Sorry, I mean there is no way to do this.
--
=========================================
Lawrence Kirby | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wilts, England | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=========================================
------------------------------
From: Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.linux,alt.os.linux,linux.redhat,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2 in RPM
Date: 29 Jan 1999 13:49:40 -0500
Matt Kressel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> According to the Kernel archives, Linus says he is nailing down bugs in
> 2.2 so he won't release 2.2.1 for another month. If you live in Windows
> world thats faster than the blink of an eye, but for us Linux weenies,
> its eternity... %)
/home/rasmusin
ttyp0 1001 paramount 13:47:53 $ finger @linux.kernel.org
[linux.kernel.org]
The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.2.1
The latest beta version of the Linux kernel is: 2.1.132
The latest prepatch (alpha) version *appears* to be: 2.2.0-pre9
so now 2.2.2 should be the a-few-weeks-away release =)
--
Frank Sweetser rasmusin at wpi.edu fsweetser at blee.net | PGP key available
paramount.ind.wpi.edu RedHat 5.2 kernel 2.2.0 i586 | at public servers
P.S. I suppose I really should be nicer to people today, considering
I'll be singing in Billy Graham's choir tonight... :-)
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP! Linux Compatible Modems?
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 14:19:29 -0500
Ramanlal Mistry wrote:
> Does anyone have a list (or at least know a few) of internal 56K modems that
> are compatible with Linux 5.0? Or, does anyone know of a Linux driver to
> support a U.S. Robotics 56K PCI Winmodem? Please give very specific product
> information.
>
> I appreciate your help.
>
> Raj
Only Winmodems are incompatible with linux. Avoid "Win-" anything because
it emulates hardware functionality in closed-source software emulation in
windows. Pay a little more to get the hardware that does everything itself.
You'll save cpu cycles for other things, too.
-Bob
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Which 'flavor' of Linux best for a M$ Separatist
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 13:45:55 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Teri,
Just a few years ago installing Linux was fairly hard and
error
prone. For the most part the several companies that offer Linux
have
good install programs that are fairly error free with "generic"
hardware. The probing succeeeds and the questions are not so
intense
on install questions and the questions that are asked have helper
text to quide your choices.
One of the better packages for a new user is RH 5.2. It pretty
straight forward and offers three install methods, Workstation,
Server and Custom. The Workstation and Server canned installs
are
very brain dead and cook up a nice installation of linux. If
something
is missing which you might like from the install say Emacs for
the
Server install. You can get that of the CD's easily. For the
most
part what you need to get an initial view of Linux is there. The
best part is you have access Linux and can get to the HOWTO's and
other Linux doc. After some initial putzing you can build your
own
configuration with a custom build or choose another brand of
Linux
after you get your feet wet.
d
teri wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Bow Shock Wave <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:56:17 -0700, Brad Cuppy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >%I would go with Red Hat (RH) over Caldera.
>
> I agree with this. I use both, RH at work, Caldera at home, and I'm
> finding that most rpms out there are built with RH in mind and I
> can barely install any on Caldera (unless of course they were built
> by Caldera.) I always get dependency failures
> on shared libs, mostly libc.so.6 but plenty of others too.
>
> It seems that Caldera has built their RPMS in a slightly different
> way and they don't quite work like RH's. I recently posted a query
> in this newsgroup about uucp configuration files and got no answer.
> The same configuration in RH works fine.
>
> >...
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Devin Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DE-528
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 11:36:24 -0500
Hey does anyone out there know how to setup a pci D-Link de-528 network
card? Been trying to get it installed but to no avail. Any help would be
greatly appreciated. Thanks.
Devin
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.security.firewalls
Subject: Weird networking behavior (it doesn't make sense) (help?)
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 19:19:29 GMT
Ok, I have a linux (redhat 5.1) machine with two network cards in it.
I know that both network cards are working because when I plug both of these
cards into the same hub, and also plug in a second computer to this hub, I can
ping the IP addresses of both of these network cards.
Also, I have ip forwarding turned on (I went to /etc/sysconfig and changed the
ipv4 line in 'network' to 'true')
So far, so good. This is the problem:
The cards are assigned Ip addresses .55 and .56 - the card that got installed
with redhat is .55 and the card I added later is .56. If I unplug .56 from
the hub, I can no longer ping .56 with the third machine (makes sense) BUT I
can still ping .55 (because it is still plugged in).
However, if I unplug .55, and leave .56 plugged into the hub, then the second
machine should still be able to ping .56 ... right? But it can't. .56 is
plugged in fine, but if I try to ping .56 I get no answer. As soon as I plug
in .55 again, I get an answer from .56.
So the question is, why is this happening? Why does card #1 need to be
plugged into the hub in order for me to ping .56, which is also plugged into
the hub? I went to the local console and tried to ping out from the box -
and the same thing happened - I can ping out if .55 is plugged in, but if .56
is plugged in, no dice.
ALSO:
It seems to me that if ip forwarding is on, I should be able to unplug one of
the network cards (.56 for instance) and still be able to ping it (because .55
which is still plugged into the hub would see the packet destined for .56 and
pass it on because forwarding is enabled - even though .56 is not plugged into
the hub - or anything else for that matter). Or is that not how ip forwarding
works?
If you haven't guessed, i am trying to set up a simple filtering firewall,
but before I throw this box between my network and the outside world, I need
to make sure it works, and so far it doesn't seem to. HOW should the network
cards be behaving so as to indicate to me that it is ready to throw it up
between the outside and my network?
thanks,
lt
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: WANPIPE, X.25 and Linux
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 16:34:56 GMT
Hi all,
Can anyone comment on using the Sangoma WANPIPE (S508) under Linux for IP
routing over X.25???
It looks like an ideal solution but I'd like to discuss with anyone who has
actually implemented....
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Fredrik R Ingels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: d-link DFE-530 TX
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 18:34:21 +0100
Hi I have BIG problems with my D-link DFE530 TX card.
Im use the VIA-RHINE driver.
then Im install it compile and install it works as it should....
Now to the problem....
Then I reboot the computer I get this fault at boot up.
INSMOD : /lib/modules/preferred/net/via-rhine.o : symbol for io nor
found
and then the network card daunt work.
Then I try to ping I get network un reacheble and that is after I have
aktivete the network from x.
Can any one help me PLS.
Regards
Fredrik
Ps
thanx all for helping me to get the driver from the begining.
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Diskless PC setup?
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 09:22:39 -0800
Does anyone know how to setup a diskless PC with RH Linux 5.2? I have a
3-PC LAN and in my closet I have an old 486Dx 133Mhz(Turbochip) that I want
to use. Only thing is that I don't want to invest in this old thing. All it
has is the case, motherboard w/vga built-in, 8MB RAM, and the chip.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heinzl)
Subject: Re: named: No response from Server
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 19:34:05 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stef wrote:
>Few days ago I setup a machine withe Debian 2.0 r3. I have named
>running on that machine, since it will be connected to the internet
>later. Right now its just part of my private network
>192.168.1.0. After installation, named ran fine, and could resolve the
>two hosts I put into /etc/hosts. After I rebooted the machine, named
>does not work properly anymore:
neither named nor nslookup use /etc/hosts ...
>two:~> nslookup
>Default Server: localhost
>Address: 127.0.0.1
>
>> set debug
>> tod
>Server: localhost
>Address: 127.0.0.1
>
>;; res_mkquery(0, tod.hoes.li, 1, 1)
>timeout
... guess you've got at least one forwarders entry and they are
not reachable.
[...]
>Any idea, what could be the problem?
Wrong setup, what do you want to do ? For a primitive caching only
server see, aside from others ...
http://www.monocerus.demon.co.uk/
... the examples section in manuals. If you want an internal server
or add hosts to named's database make sure no-one from the outer
world can connect to your server.
Cheers,
Juergen
--
\ Real name : J�rgen Heinzl \ no flames /
\ EMail Private : [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ send money instead /
\ Phone Private : +44 181-332 0750 \ /
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: help me APACHE 1.3.3 and DNS
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 99 17:03:02 GMT
Hi,
I am learning by myselft to manage a local network server running Linux
I am using RH5.2
I am facing 2 major troubles :
My serveur Apache 1.3.3 does not want to run the directive "DirectoryIndex"
The "dir" module is well logged and the daemon does run well, but I can never
get index.htm or index.html as default index running. WHY ???
2nd problem:
How to configure the DNS server ? the stations connected to my network can not
find the DNS. I can not find enough documentation to manage this problem.
my configuration:
local domain name : xcoudin.fr 172.16.0.x netmask 255.255.255.0
server name : serveur.xcoudin.fr 172.16.0.2 Linux RH5.2
host name : station.xcoudin.fr 172.16.0.1 (Win 95)
server name & host-name are well declared in the "hosts" files
--
\\\\\|/////
( @ @ )
---oOOo-(_)-oOOo-------------------------------
Xavier COUDIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Computers are like air conditioners :
they stop working properly when you open Windows"
===========0ooo================================
oooO ( )
( ) ) /
\ ( (_/
\_)
------------------------------
From: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: swapon -s returning error
Date: 28 Jan 1999 22:30:35 +0000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>
> I am having trouble getting my swap spaces to work. My fstab file
> is ok, I have created the partitions, etc. When I run swapon -a
> with no options, the space is added with a priority of -1. This
> seems strange to me.
It's quite normal.
> When I run swapon -s I get this:
> swapon: /proc/swaps: No such file or directory
[root@periwinkle /]# swapon -s
Filename Type Size Used Priority
/dev/hda5 partition 130500 1256 -1
[root@periwinkle /]# uname -a
Linux periwinkle 2.2.0 #2 SMP Tue Jan 26 21:43:21 GMT 1999 i586 unknown
[root@periwinkle /]#
--
ACTUALLY reachable as @free-lunch.demon.(whitehouse)co.uk:james+usenet
------------------------------
From: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: --Someone Please Help-- Network unreachable and No responce from server
errors...
Date: 28 Jan 1999 22:35:09 +0000
"Jeremy Fowler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, here is the situation (please, it looks long but you may find it
> amusing)...
>
[33 line paragraph]
Please organise your question better!
> 2nd Edition, and plenty of posts to DNS newsgroups!). Then I set up sendmail
Should work out of the box on RH.
> first name basis with Claus Assmann (kidding)). Well all was working
> wonderfully lastnight, All I had to do was wait for our ISP to get off their
> ass and edit their DNS entries for our domain to point to the appropriate
> places. Then I noticed something strange. When I was logged in as root, I
> had total network access, but If I logged in as any other user I lost
> network connection (outside my domain, I could still ping hosts on
> our LAN,
chmod a+r /etc/resolv.conf
> but all outside networks were unreachable). No big deal, I figured I would
> figure it out later. Now today, for some strange reason it does it for root
> too. For the first couple of minutes after I would reboot and login as root
> I had internet access and could ping my nameserver, but if I tried pinging
> anywhere else I got a "Network is unreachable" error. Then if I tried
This is a FAQ. You mistakenly installed routed/gated.
> So, It looks like it's the ISP,
Nope, looks to me like it's you. No default route.
> (209.160.218.2 and 3) on this Win 98 PC and its doing fine. I've reinstalled
> RH and everything was set back to default settings, and it's doing the same
> thing as before, so it may or may not be the RH box. I've replace network
> cables, changed Hub ports to known working ports,
Did you try searching DejaNews? :-)
--
ACTUALLY reachable as @free-lunch.demon.(whitehouse)co.uk:james+usenet
------------------------------
From: "Slam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Redhat 5.2's Samba + Windows 2000 Pro (build 1965) DOES NOT NETWORK
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.winnt50.beta.networking,microsoft.public.winnt50.beta.networking.protocols,microsoft.public.winnt50.beta.general,linux.samba,linux.redhat.misc,comp.protocols.smb
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 19:50:20 GMT
So you're saying that I must upgrade to Samba v2.0 for Win2k Pro to see the
shares?
James Nord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Slam wrote:
> >
> > Should I upgrade to Samba 2.0? Is it Windows 2000 compatible?
>
> I have, works fine although NT5 *refuses* to send plain text passwords
> even after configuring it to do so.
>
> /James
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.unix.admin,comp.unix.programmer,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.windows
Subject: Re: Help! Need program to monitor network activity of all processes
Date: 30 Jan 1999 16:09:19 GMT
In article <78tlpl$jtu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does anyone know how to monitor the total number of bytes sent and received by
>each process on a system, over all ports at all times?
Look at libpcap (ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/libpcap.tar.Z). This will allow
you to extract the information you're looking for as efficiently as
possible. It doesn't work on Windows though (not sure if anything
would there).
The information that comes in the tar file isn't going to be enough to
get you going with it. I'd suggest getting Richard Stevens' "Unix
Network Programming" Vol 1, Second edition. He develops some test
programs using libpcap that will be very helpful. If you're going to
be doing network programming on Unix, you'll want that book anyway.
>Also, does there exist a cheap (or free) web-hosting software package that
>does user accounting for you? (with or without the process-level traffic
>monitor capability I ask for above.)
Can't help you there, sorry.
Joe
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (spivey)
Subject: Starting a firewall script.
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 19:53:52 GMT
Hello,
To Configure my firewall I added to /etc/rc.d/rc.local ;
/sbin/depmod -a
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_raudio
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_irc
ipfwadm -F -p deny
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 10.1.1.0/8 -D 0.0.0.0/0
*Should this give me enough security? What about all these
cool long scripts that I see?
*Is this the proper way to start the fire wall or should I
take the above commands and create rc.firewall?
Site http://rlz.ne.mediaone.net/linux/firewall/ details
installation of rc.firewall. It gives three senerios on how to start
the script.
*Could someone tell my the differences?
DHCP Users
Edit /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifdhcpc-done and add the
following line to the end
of the file:
Static IP Users
Edit /etc/rc.d/rc.local and add the following line to the end of the
file:
sh /etc/rc.d/rc.firewall
or alternately,
Create a new executable script file in /etc/rc.d/init.d and add the
following lines:
#!/bin/sh
sh /etc/rc.d/rc.firewall
Create symbolic links to the script in /etc/rc.d/rc3.d and
/etc/rc.d/rc5.d. Number the
links to execute between inet and named.
thanks,
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
