Linux-Networking Digest #75, Volume #10 Mon, 1 Feb 99 07:13:37 EST
Contents:
swapon -s returning error ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: ISA RealTek 8019 (kurt)
Re: Samba & Win 98 ("Change")
proxy arp with kernel 2.2.0 ?? (Andreas Merz)
Re: IP Aliasing (Joerg Klaas)
PPP Connection can't ping some sites (Mike Westerfield)
Domain Name Hosting Question (Brian Lavender)
Re: Telnet Puzzle
Re: inetd & selecting an interface (David Efflandt)
Re: 100MBit ethernet PCI card RealTek 8139 ("Peter T. Drechsler")
samba printer sharing problem (Conrad Kong-Yee Chow)
Re: Network time problem revisited... (Villy Kruse)
FRAME errors (ReplyToPlatoAtAccesswestDotCom)
Re: Compaq - netelligent ethernet (Kestas Liaugminas)
Samba nmbd & windows 95 ("Victor Roos")
inetd & selecting an interface (Jeff Taylor)
Re: PAM: mountd[327]: SECURITY: A user with uid != 0 can write to /etc/exports
(Thorsten Kukuk)
PPP no longer working ("Nigel Sim")
PPP No longer working ("Nigel Sim")
Redirecting Traffic based on Port Nr. ("Volker Kalthaus")
Re: 3com 3c905b cyclone full/half duplex switch (Peter van der Landen)
Re: Another Newbie PPP question ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Samba & Win 98 ("Chris Kafkaris")
Re: Win98 not answering pings from RH 5.2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Virtual Private Networking ("Amir Man")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: swapon -s returning error
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 17:53:01 GMT
Hi,
I am having trouble getting my swap spaces to work. My fstab file is ok, I
have created the partitions, etc. When I run swapon -a with no options, the
space is added with a priority of -1. This seems strange to me.
When I run swapon -s I get this:
swapon: /proc/swaps: No such file or directory
I don't think the swap space has ever been utilized. I tried loading my
system, which has 48 mb of ram, with no utilization. Free mem dropped to
less than 1MB, and still no swapping.
Please help me out on this, It is really causing some problems.
thank you very much,
Brad Beck
net admin
Industrial Supply Company
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (kurt)
Subject: Re: ISA RealTek 8019
Date: 1 Feb 1999 06:46:06 GMT
On Fri, 29 Jan 1999 01:27:01 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pat Gallion)
wrote:
<snip>
>Basically to get rset8019 to work, it must extract in a 32 bit
>environment, with no drivers loaded for the nic, but the card must be
>initialized. Good luck, hope this helps. Now if I could figure out why
>minicom works and my chatscript doesn't...
>
Hello,
I am having the same problem. How do initalize the card but have no
drivers loaded?
Thanks,
Kurt
------------------------------
From: "Change" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba & Win 98
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 23:24:15 -0800
You will need to set a reg entry to allow passwords to be delivered in the
clear. I myself can't remember the reg entry required.
Win95 allows it by default, 98 must be forced.
Anyone know the reg key?
Scallica wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hey,
>
>I can't seem to map a network drive in Win 98. It keeps saying "password
>incorrect". I can map to the linux machine perfectly on a Win 95 machine.
>On the Win 98 machine, I log in at startup, but when I try to map, it
prompts
>for a password but will not accept it. Any ideas? Thanx.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 07:53:33 +0000
From: Andreas Merz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: proxy arp with kernel 2.2.0 ??
H i !
I have a problem with setting up a proxy arp with my SuSE-Linux 6.0 .
With the kernel 2.0.xx it worked fine, I used the settings described in
the HOWTO for proxy arp:
arp -i eth1 -sD xxx.yyy.zzz.0 eth1 netmask 255.255.255.0 pub
With the new kernel I always get the error "invalid argument", and the
error ist caused by using the network mask. Maybe this is caused by the
autoroute-routines of the new kernel.
This is, what I want to use my linux for:
I have a C-class subnet with a gateway, and I want to hide some of the
connected host by a proxy arp (with IP-Filter :-). This proxy should by
transparent, so that no settings on the host must be changed. This
worked fine with the old kernel-version, I just defined the main network
by I route for the whole network on the outside interface, an then for
each host on the inside interface its' own route. Now this isn't
possible any more by the same way, so I would be glad for some help! Has
someone other tips for a transparent routers??
Thanks in advance,
ANDREAS
------------------------------
From: Joerg Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP Aliasing
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 08:09:57 +0100
aliasing related question:
Do you know if it's only me who's having the problem of beeing unable to ping a
aliased IP address (or make a IP connection in general) from and to the machine
that aliasing is configured on... ?
Thanks,
Joerg
Brian McCauley wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Does anyone know if there is a maximum number of IP Addresses that can be
> > aliased on one interface?
>
> 255.
>
> Why are you asking?
>
> If you want a contiguous range of IP addresses there's a much more
> elegant way with 2.1.x (and presumably 2.2.x).
>
> --
> \\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> . _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
> .__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
> . l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
> # ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
> ###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: Mike Westerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP Connection can't ping some sites
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:31:05 -0500
I'm having a problem I've never seen before. When I establish a PPP
connection to my local ISP, I can't ping some sites outside my ISP
(exmp: redhat.com), but I can ping others outside my ISP (exmp.
yahoo.com). However, I can traceroute to redhat and SOMETIMES I can
reach redhat.com throught my browser. BTW, I don't have any problems w/
my 98 machine that is using the same settings.
Any ideas? (I have had weird problems from Day 1 with networking on
this box. I originally could use my ethernet card at work, but now all
of a sudden can't ping outside my local subnet. I never had these
problems w/ Redhat 5.1. (Course it took my a while to get my Compaq
Netflex-3 in my docking station to work :). ))
Mike Westerfield
Citrix Systems Engineer
Sunterra Resorts, Inc.
Orlando, Fl
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Lavender)
Subject: Domain Name Hosting Question
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 08:47:58 GMT
I want to move my brie.com to my own dedicated machine where I have a
static IP address. I currently have it virtually located. When I do a
$whois brie.com I get the following:
Domain servers in listed order:
NS1.REQUEST.NET 206.151.75.9
NS2.REQUEST.NET 208.211.228.3
NS3.REQUEST.NET 209.27.13.3
My static IP address of my own machine at home is 207.212.133.10
Do I have to set up DNS on my local machine to make this work? When I
modify internic will I modify the section above to on my Internic
Registration to look like below?
Domain servers in listed order:
WWW.BRIE.COM 207.212.133.10
Are there any other modifications I should be aware of to do this?
TIA,
brian
====================
Brian Lavender
Sacramento, CA
http://www.brie.com/brian/
"For best results, squeeze from the bottom and flatten as you go up."
-- Colgate Toothpaste Tube
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Telnet Puzzle
Date: 1 Feb 1999 08:41:43 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Stephan Gross ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: : I'm telnetting from my Windows 98 box to a three-times removed Unix
: : box, like this: Win98 -> Router1 --> Router 2 -> Unix
: : The Win98 box is on a different network than the Unix box.
: : Here's the puzzle: I can telnet from win98 to Router1, win98 to
: : Router2, but not Win98 to Unix. On the other hand, I can also telnet
: : from Router2 to Unix. How can this be?
: Can you telnet from router1 to unix?
: It could be that the unix box has a /hosts/allow arrangement allowing
: connections from the local LAN segment only.
: Router 2 is the only other device (in your diagram) that is on the
: same segment as UNIX.
Also (and at the risk of following up on my own followup) does the Unix box
have the correct subnet mask and/or gateway specified?
--
Damian Maxwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: David Efflandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: inetd & selecting an interface
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 08:46:16 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/31/99, 3:51:41 PM, Jeff Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote=20
regarding inetd & selecting an interface:
> I would like to be able to selectively enable inetd with most services=
> available
> from eth0 (private network to the other computer at home) and almost
> nothing
> available from ppp0. Someone tried to telnet into my machine last
> night.
> There is no reason to even leave that door available.
> Thanx,
> Jeff
See 'man 5 hosts_access' and 'man hosts_options'. Just set up=20
hosts.allow for your LAN and hosts.deny for ALL: ALL.
I found someone playing around with my imapd and ipopd, which failed=20
because I don't have them installed.
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Drechsler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: 100MBit ethernet PCI card RealTek 8139
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 08:54:28 +0000
Hi.
1. read the manual. i never do it myself, but somestimes it
helps.
2. get yourself a dos boot disk.
3. boot dos with this disk.
4. on a utility disk that comes with the network card, there
should be a
diagnostics program or a setup program that runs under
dos.
5. use the apropriate setup tool to adjust half/full duplex,
i/o, irq, 10/100Mbps
and so on.
6. it should work, so.
7. it worked in my network.
hope i could help
peter
------------------------------
From: Conrad Kong-Yee Chow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
linux.samba,hk.comp.os.linux,comp.os.ms-windows.nt,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.setup.hardware,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.setup
Subject: samba printer sharing problem
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 01:20:39 -0800
hi
i have a linux box running redhat 5.1 and an epson stylus 400 printer
attached. the other machine is a nt 4.0. i use samba 1.9.18 on redhat
5.1 to share files and printer between the 2 computers. now when i print
from netscape 4.5 on the nt box i have this weird thing it just doesn't
print the even number pages. the paper goes through but it won't print
and return these blank sheets. so weird it skipped on every even number
pages. other printing is fine, like word or internet explorer, it's just
netscape giving me the problem. has anyone come across this b4? any
advice would be appreciated. thanx.
--
Yours,
conrad kong-yee chow
my recognition in the cyberspace:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://cky.tzo.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Network time problem revisited...
Date: 1 Feb 1999 10:23:09 +0100
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>OK. Thanks. Any ideas on how to fix it? Tweak the timezone settings on
>one or the other machine?
>
It that case the time zone should be fixed on the OS/2 machine. Or start
looking again for a better server program for your OS/2 machine.
Villy
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ReplyToPlatoAtAccesswestDotCom)
Subject: FRAME errors
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 06:02:54 GMT
I get the following on only one Linux box on our network, and would
like to know what is the likely cause.
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:527231 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:2 <--
TX packets:529691 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
Collisions:797
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x6100
I've seen this count as high as 32 in a week, so I'm concerned.
This system:
Pentium/32mb
Realtek PCI NIC
Slackware 3.6
Kernel 2.0.36
Squid
Apache
------------------------------
From: Kestas Liaugminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Compaq - netelligent ethernet
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 09:43:49 +0100
Try this
http://potter.ieee.uh.edu/compaq.html
Thomas Searing wrote:
>
> I am trying to configure a 10/100 utp card and have not been able to
> configure this under 5.2. Any assistance would be appreciated
>
> Tom
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Victor Roos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba nmbd & windows 95
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 11:09:19 +0100
Hi,
Could someone please help me with this situation:
I have RHL 4.1 running on a 486 notebook. I installed a Target
Ethernet -PCMCIA-card. Between this machine and a P133 with Windows95 on it,
tcp/ip works fine. Pinging is ok. Telnet works fine.
I want to use Samba to share a linux directory '/home/public'. All works
fine on the linux-machine itself. When I use smbclient a can access the
directory. Samba also reports the services, when asked with 'smbclient -L
host'.
However Windows 95 does not see any (NetBIOS)host except itself. I tried
everything to get it to recognise the name of the linux-host: filling in the
lmhosts-file, activating WINS.
The smbd en nmbd are started through inetd in my configuration. When the're
not running, and I use smbclient to inquire, the deamons are started and the
correct response follows. An inquiry using 'net view' or a request using
'net use' does not lead to deamons starting.
It seems that somethings wrong with the listening to the netbios ports in
the services file, but I can not understand what. The samba logfile reports:
'bind failed on port 139 socket_addr=0 (Address already in use)', just after
'becoming a deamon'.
The relevant part of the services file looks like this:
netbios-ns 137/tcp nbns
netbios-ns 137/udp nbns
netbios-dgm 138/tcp nbdgm
netbios-dgm 138/udp nbdgm
netbios-ssn 139/tcp nbssn
The related piece of inetd.conf is (using tabs as separator):
netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/smbd smbd
netbios-ns dgram udp wait root /usr/sbin/nmbd nmbd
I've read the documentation ten times and backwards, I haven't got a clue,
do you?
Thanks
Victor.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 21:51:41 +0000
From: Jeff Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: inetd & selecting an interface
I would like to be able to selectively enable inetd with most services
available
from eth0 (private network to the other computer at home) and almost
nothing
available from ppp0. Someone tried to telnet into my machine last
night.
There is no reason to even leave that door available.
Thanx,
Jeff
------------------------------
From: Thorsten Kukuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PAM: mountd[327]: SECURITY: A user with uid != 0 can write to
/etc/exports
Date: 1 Feb 1999 07:48:00 GMT
Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PAM is almost too smart for a small LAN.
No, your problem has nothing to do with PAM. rpc.mountd and rpc.nfsd
checks, if /etc/exports is owned by uid 0, gid 0. Recompile them,
if /etc/exports should be owned by another user.
Thorsten
> Two machines on a xover cable in my home office. Separate net than ppp0 dialup.
> I was mucking around with /etc/exports and changed owner.group from root.root to
>tim.users
> so I could make edits without 'su root'. All networking stopped. rpc.nfsd and
>rpc.mountd
> exited immediately and silently on restart.
> Once the permissions were set back, all was well.
> messages contained:
> Jan 31 18:19:09 asus portmap[508]: connect from 192.168.158.101 to getport(mountd):
> request from unauthorized host
> Jan 31 18:19:09 asus portmap[509]: connect from 192.168.158.101 to getport(mountd):
> request from unauthorized host
> Jan 31 18:20:01 asus mountd[327]: access from host 192.168.158.100 rejected
> Jan 31 18:20:13 asus mountd[327]: access from host 192.168.158.100 rejected
> Jan 31 18:20:38 asus PAM_pwdb[512]: (su) session opened for user root by (uid=0)
> Jan 31 18:22:21 asus PAM_pwdb[512]: (su) session closed for user root
> Jan 31 18:23:46 asus PAM_pwdb[548]: (su) session opened for user root by (uid=0)
> Jan 31 18:24:25 asus mountd[327]: SECURITY: A user with uid != 0 can write to
> /etc/exports!
> Jan 31 18:24:25 asus mountd[327]: exiting because of security violation.
> Jan 31 18:24:25 asus nfsd[336]: SECURITY: A user with uid != 0 can write to
>/etc/exports!
> Jan 31 18:24:25 asus nfsd[336]: exiting because of security violation.
> Jan 31 18:24:27 asus PAM_pwdb[548]: (su) session closed for user root
> Jan 31 18:24:38 asus portmap[564]: connect from 192.168.158.101 to getport(mountd):
> request from unauthorized host
> Jan 31 18:24:38 asus portmap[565]: connect from 192.168.158.101 to getport(mountd):
> request from unauthorized host
> --
> [Replies: remove the D]
> "Everything is permitted. Nothing is forbidden."
> WS Burroughs.
--
Thorsten Kukuk http://home.pages.de/~kukuk/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE GmbH Schanzaeckerstr. 10 90443 Nuernberg
Linux is like a Vorlon. It is incredibly powerful, gives terse,
cryptic answers and has a lot of things going on in the background.
------------------------------
From: "Nigel Sim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP no longer working
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 20:39:06 +1000
I originally installed RedHat 5.0 with pretty much all the extra's, and I
managed to get it to connect to the net through PPP using the network
manager in X. Today I upgraded the kernel to 2.2.1 and I made sure I added
all the PPP and IP related bits. But now when I try to activate the PPP1
device it dials, the lights flash a bit, but it then hangs up. When I boot
to Win95 I can still connect (as you can see).
What could be the problem here? Is there any known errors in 2.2.1 that I
should know about?
Thanks in advance.
Nigel
------------------------------
From: "Nigel Sim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP No longer working
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 21:13:10 +1000
I originally installed RedHat 5.0 with pretty much all the extra's, and I
managed to get it to connect to the net through PPP using the network
manager in X. Today I upgraded the kernel to 2.2.1 and I made sure I added
all the PPP and IP related bits. But now when I try to activate the PPP1
device it dials, the lights flash a bit, but it then hangs up. When I boot
to Win95 I can still connect (as you can see).
What could be the problem here? Is there any known errors in 2.2.1 that I
should know about?
Thanks in advance.
Nigel
------------------------------
From: "Volker Kalthaus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Redirecting Traffic based on Port Nr.
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 12:23:04 +0100
Hello all,
i need help dealing with the following problem:
i have one linux box servin as router & firewall. This Linux Box has one
official internet IP Adress. My Problem is now, that i want to redirect all
incoming traffic on port 80 to a specific IP Adr. Same for port 25.
So how can i redirect Traffic on Linux based on Port Nr. to other IP Adrs
???????
Thanks in advance,
Volker Kalthaus
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter van der Landen)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc,nl.comp.os.linux,redhat.networking.general,utwente.os.linux
Subject: Re: 3com 3c905b cyclone full/half duplex switch
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 11:35:20 GMT
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999 15:29:19 +0100, "Willem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hi
>
>I have bought a 3com 905b cyclone card which doesn't perform that well
>(about 98% packet loss). I suspect it to be in full duplex (while it is
>connected to a half-duplex network) but the config program for the 3c90x
>that I downloaded from 3com's site states that it is in half-duplex. (I'm
>talking about 3C90XCFG.EXE - dos program)
>
>Now are there any utilities, either for windows or for linux, that force it
>to be in halfduplex? For windows I know there are, because they were shipped
>with the cards I have installed for a company. But I can't find them on the
>3com site.
>
>In Linux, I've read /usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/vortext.txt,
>which tells me that there are specific options to force the card to be in
>full duplex. So am I right to conclude that it defaults to half duplex?
>
>Please send me such utility or give me an url? Thanks so much in advance,
You are right. Even if you switch to FD using the setup software it
will still go back to HD. It also seems to default to 10Mb if your
switch/hub supports that.
The solution is to compile the driver as a module and load it like
this:
/sbin/modprobe 3c59x options=5 full_duplex=1
This sets 100Mb mode & full duplex, setting full_duplex=0 will
probably select Half Duplex instead.
Regards,
Peter van der Landen
=====================================================================
Law Faculty, L4-45, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Holland
Tel +31-10-4082237 (home 2800956) Fax +31-10-2800957
================== E=mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] =========================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Another Newbie PPP question
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 11:39:43 GMT
In article <78r5na$qgt$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Faust" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a related post that I sent yesterday I *did* post my log *after* reading
> several hundred posts, none of which mentioned the "7 stop bits" line that I
> asked about.
You appear to be confused. I did not as far as I recall post to the thread
you are talking about. Did I mail you? If so why are you replying in public
in another thread?
I have *never* seen any mention of "7 stop bits". "7 data bits" is
very frequently asked and answered.
> You, *Brian McCauley*, were still not happy and indicated that
> I should read the *100 other posts*.
What I try to impress on people is that if there are already 100 other posts
substancially identical to what they are about to post then they should read
the replies to those and explain in their post why the common answers don't
help them. Failure to do so means they'll just get the same answers again
and waste everyone's time.
Do you have a problem with this? Does it not seem obvious once it's been
explianed to you?
> The people in this group are some of the most helpful and knowledgable that
> I have seen anywhere. Unfortunately there will always be exceptions.
Are you seriously contending that I am not one of the helpful and knowledgable
ones? Have you looked at my Dejanews profile? I've looked at yours.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Chris Kafkaris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba & Win 98
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 23:01:18 +1100
On the 98 box,
Startup Regedit
Go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE
Find the key
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/System/CurrentControlSet/Services/VxD/VNETSUP
>From the menu bar, select Edit/New/DWORD Value
Rename the new entry to EnablePlainTextPassword
double click the new entry, and set its value to 1
Exit and reboot
Scallica wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hey,
>
>I can't seem to map a network drive in Win 98. It keeps saying "password
>incorrect". I can map to the linux machine perfectly on a Win 95 machine.
>On the Win 98 machine, I log in at startup, but when I try to map, it
prompts
>for a password but will not accept it. Any ideas? Thanx.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Win98 not answering pings from RH 5.2
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 1999 11:13:17 GMT
there are a few basic things that i dont know, did you try 'em or not?
like :
have those two machines connected earlier, maybe with win95 on both , or linux
on both ...
so we would know the physical connection is ok.
next:
can each machine ping itself
( like ping 127.0.0.1, and ping "the-name-of-machine-you-try-to ping -from" )
if all else works, try tcpdump to see more about the packets
> >
> >-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> >http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Amir Man" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Virtual Private Networking
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 13:37:12 +0200
Does Linux support this? If so, how do you configure it?
10x
Amir
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
