Linux-Networking Digest #107, Volume #10 Thu, 4 Feb 99 06:13:46 EST
Contents:
Re: interest in Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Anyone know of good firewall and proxyfor linux? (Thomas Zajic)
Re: masq packet loss (Joerg Klaas)
Re: UDP fwding in 2.0.36 for battlenet (Mark)
Re: Sendmail Error Message (Ray Willis)
ftp under linux is unreliable ("Richard Latimer")
Re: getting out of the gateway (Eugene Strulyov)
Re: DHCP client (dhcpcd) for Caldera 1.3? (Bob Nixon)
Re: Will Linux work with a Cable Modem??? (Richard Tilmann)
Re: minicom "killed by signal 11" (Tim Moore)
INN PROBLEM (Kristofer Pettijohn)
Re: Connecting Linux to USWest.net (S.Smith)
Re: Incorrect Password When Telneting (Thomas Zajic)
2 modems - how do I multilink? ("Dazza")
modem init ("Robin")
modem init ("Robin")
Re: OS Discovery progarm (Joerg Klaas)
Re: Where can I find source for utilities? (Tim Moore)
Re: NFS and dynamic IP address (Stephen Carville)
Re: route: netmask doesn't match route address (Craig Lucas)
Configuring Netscape ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: ipfwadm questions (Tobias Reckhard (jester))
Re: Will Linux work with a Cable Modem??? (Luca Filipozzi)
Linux DNS Server software ??? ("softalk")
Re: named addresses (Paul Kimoto)
route: netmask doesn't match route address (Craig Lucas)
Re: Need Kinston KNE20PnP driver (Scott W. Petesen)
Re: Linux DNS Server software ??? ("J.S. Mammen")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: interest in Linux
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 19:53:43 GMT
Visit http://www.ssc.com/glue/groups/nonus/hongkong.html
"wh38" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm from Hong Kong. I had heard about Linux from many magazine and
>newspaper and know that it is a much powerful OS. I would like to be a
>beginner on Linux but there were many version/company of Linux. Would
>anyone can introduce to me.
>
>Also, I also plan to build a network (Lan) in my company. Let Linux be my
>server and a number above ten or more windows95 client. Would it possible
>to do it?
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Thomas Zajic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Anyone know of good firewall and proxyfor linux?
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 19:57:43 GMT
Scott MacDonald wrote:
> I am desperately in need of a firewall and proxy for linux, any help would
> be greatly appreciated if someone could point me in the right direction!
Try http://www.socks.nec.com
Thomas
--
=---------------------------------------------------------------------=
- Thomas Zajic aka ZlatkO ThE GoDFatheR, Vienna/Austria -
- Spam-proof e-mail: thomas(DOT)zajic(AT)teleweb(DOT)at -
=---------------------------------------------------------------------=
------------------------------
From: Joerg Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: masq packet loss
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 07:14:24 +0100
...look in the supportdb.at "http://www.suse.de" and search for "dynamic ip
address" and/or "ppp".
the answer is out there...
Patrick Scharrenberg wrote:
> Hi..
>
> I set up my isdn connection and masq. ... it runns..
>
> BUT: when the isdn-line is down and I try to reach an internethost it does
> not work.. when I cancel the "not established" connection and retry it.. it
> works...
>
> what can I do???
>
> c.u.
> ..patrick
------------------------------
From: Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: UDP fwding in 2.0.36 for battlenet
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 01:38:03 GMT
> > > I got Starcraft/Brood War workin with these commands in
> > > /etc/rc.d/rc.local
> > >
> > > /usr/sbin/ipautofw -A -r tcp 6112 6112 -h 192.168.1.2
> > > /usr/sbin/ipautofw -A -r udp 6112 6112 -h 192.168.1.2
> > >
> > > Right after the ipfwadm commands. Diablo is suppose to work with this:
> > >
> > > /usr/sbin/ipautofw -A -r udp 6112 6112 -c tcp 116
> > > /usr/sbin/ipautofw -A -r udp 6112 6112 -c tcp 118
> > >
> > > But it complains to me that my network connection is too poor. BTW you
> > > will get all red bars in channels in BNet. Don't pay attention to that,
> > > it's not true.
> >
> > These last two lines didn't work for me. I switched to a 2.2 kernel
> > and the first two lines did work, no red bars whatsoever and no
> > complaint about a poor network.
> >
> > However, those two lines also make sure that 192.168.1.2 is the
> > only host that can play battle.net. Is there a trick to allow
> > more hosts to play?
> >
finally got it to work!!!
NOTES:
1) tossout the old ipfwadm rules. ALL of them. they just get in the way.
ipfwadm -I -f
ipfwadm -O -f
ipfwadm -F -f
2) clear out the ipchains
ipchains -F input
ipchains -F output
ipchains -F forward
3) set everything to ACCEPT (just want it to work! blocking otherstuff later)
ipchains -P input ACCEPT
ipchains -P output ACCEPT
ipchains -P forward MASQ
4) check the rules
ipchains -L
ipchains -M -L (checks the MASQ)
5) NOW the forwarding
ipmasqadm autofw -A -r tcp 6112 6112 -h 192.168.0.69
ipmasqadm autofw -A -r udp 6112 6112 -h 192.168.0.69
THIS worked when switching from 2.0.36 to 2.2.1
6) ipmasqadm must be dl'd as it is not included in any of the upgrade pkgs.
I had to hunt for the address (which is now buried someplace, grrr.)
I'm going to fiddle with the -h part and see if I can get it to do that
for the entire network. will -h 192.168.0.0/24 work:? we shall see...
I dunno though. multiple machines routing through a single port? How is it
supposed to know which one to route back to? Unless it tags each packet on
the outgoing run, but then incoming packets would not be tagged the same way.
Now I can go waste some zerglings. BBQ anyone? :)
------------------------------
From: Ray Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail Error Message
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 20:10:39 -0600
make sure you have the relay-domains in the /etc/mail/relay-domains
and you might need to make sure you have /etc/mail/sendmail.cw
<local-domains
go here>
good luck.
RayW
Rob wrote:
> > client error 551 "we do not relay." I have added the ip addresses of
> > all workstations to the /etc/mail/ip_allow file. Any idea how to make
> > sendmail relay?? Or is this message really saying something else?
>
> Stoopid question: Have you restarted sendmail since you changed the
> config file?
>
> Also, check the reference in sendmail.cf for the file that contains
> relay ips/names
>
> --
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> All men are mortal. Socrates was mortal.
> Therefore, all men are Socrates.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
From: "Richard Latimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ftp under linux is unreliable
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 22:42:25 -0800
Under Linux I connect to my ISP at 40,000+ bps using ppp. I am able to
browse, read/send mail, and read the news groups.
However, almost all of my attempts to ftp files hang/stall after the first
1% or 2% of the file transfer. As I can drop out of Linux, boot Win98
and transfer the same files, from the same sites, at rates consistently
over 4.0 KB, I am assuming there is something wrong with my Linux
configuration.
My ppp monitor window does not show any packet errors, so it must
be a case of one side or the other waiting for something it isn't getting.
Any suggestions?
richard
------------------------------
From: Eugene Strulyov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: getting out of the gateway
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 07:12:24 GMT
go to www.linux.org/help and read IP masquerading HOWTO.
BTW, you might wanna change the IP address from 192.168.1.0 to something more
appropriate. I don't think the last digit can be 0. 0, 127 and 255 have special
meaning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> I tried to set up a small network with linux boxes. There was a linux
> box with two ethernet cards. The one got its ip from a dhcp server. The other
> ethernet card linked to the internal network.
> This gateway box had one ip configured by the DHCP server and the other was
> 192.168.1.1 . The internal network had just one linux machine with ip
> 192.168.1.0. We added the route and the default gateway to 192.168.1.0.
> The internal box is able to see the gateway but not outside the gateway.
> But the gateway box is able to see the outside world and also the internal
> network. I am new to all the networking stuff. I wld be glad if someone cld
> help me out. Ip forwarding was turned on, on the gateway machine. I saw that
> in the network file where it said ipforwarding="YES".
> Thanks in Advance.
> bye
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Nixon)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.caldera
Subject: Re: DHCP client (dhcpcd) for Caldera 1.3?
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 03:36:57 GMT
On Wed, 03 Feb 1999 15:13:44 GMT, "Wadels"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Help?
>
>DHCP is a common reality, but Caldera doesn't seem to support its client or
>be interested. "Our OpenLinux distribution currently does not include a DHCP
>client. So it isn't something that we are familure with to even give you
>some pointers." (End of knowledge base entry)
Are you really dynamic with shaw.wave.ca or did they just tell you
that. @Home, your sister company allows static but you could do static
on your linux but inside a NAT (I see you posted with wintel) and run
the 9x or NT with DHCP. DHCP with cable modems has been nothing but
trouble with linux.
>So, I searched for a general use DHCP client, to find dhcpcd v. 1.3 from
>Phystech (or something like that). It looks great, except that its readme
>warns that it will not even compile without Glibc2. I know Caldera has
>glibc2 _runtime_ libraries, so my question is, will this suffice? Has anyone
>tried it?
>
>If it cannot be made to work, does anyone have a dhcpcd ver. 0.70 or better
>that was made for libc5 systems (Caldera or RedHat 4.2)?
>
>Thanks.
>
>
Bob Nixon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
� [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.home.net/bigrex/
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 14:43:56 -0500
From: Richard Tilmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Will Linux work with a Cable Modem???
>From my own recent experiences with this matter:
Father QAA wrote:
> My family is getting Comcast @ home cable modem service. I believe that
> the cable modem is actually a router that is accessed through a network
> card. That is what I think anyway. My family uses Windows 95 on many of
> our computers and that is fine for them, but I am using Red Hat Linux
> 5.2 and I am not sure that Linux will support the cable modem. If I
> didnt make it clear before, the cable line is put into a special router
> just for cable lines. Then a network card is placed inside my computer
> and the net is accessed through the router. I believe that it is a great
> deal for $40 a month(because I am already a comcast cable customer) and
> I was also wondering, and am pretty sure that Windows 95 computers can
> network to the modem via a hub to the linux server via TCP/IP????
Yes, they can. You need to configure your Linux box with IPMasquarading.
Then on the WIN 95 boxes, in the network setup configuration, set the
gateway to the linux box IP address.
> I am
> not a network guy or anything but I think if I use a hub to connect my
> Windows 95 computers to the Linux server, I believe it will work. I am
> also planning to set the linux computer up as a web server, so any tips
> on that would be appreciated too. Can I also sell off bandwith by having
> friends dial in to my cable modem access? I might want to become my own
> ISP =)
>
Don't think so. My cable modem setup by the ISP required the hardwired MAS
address on the network card. This is unique to every card manufactured.
In other words, your cable modem account can only talk with your specific
network card.
> Security for the website is also a thing. How do you setup linux to only
> let web surfers access certain directories and not others??? Just
> wondering...
> Oh and thanks for anybody who helped me on PPPD, It was a real pain, but
> I think I got it.
> Mike Tin
> Please Respond via Email at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 21:21:51 -0800
From: Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: minicom "killed by signal 11"
Did you run setup (# minicom -s)?
"Jean-Fran�ois" wrote:
>
> I have Red Hat linux 5.2 and Minicom 1.82.
> When I try to dial using ATDT655-6066, minicom exits as I type the '0' and
> gives me a "killed by signal 11' message.
> Any idea on how to fix or another small terminal program ?
--
[Replies: remove the D]
"Everything is permitted. Nothing is forbidden."
WS Burroughs.
------------------------------
From: Kristofer Pettijohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: INN PROBLEM
Date: 4 Feb 1999 05:46:09 GMT
Please help:
When I post messages to my news server (inn) I actually have to run
ctlinnd flush sitename
for it to spool the outgoing mail -- it does not do it when the message is
posted. Could somebody please tell me why this is? How do I fix it?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (S.Smith)
Crossposted-To: mn.online-service
Subject: Re: Connecting Linux to USWest.net
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 06:13:40 GMT
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999 20:53:35 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clayton Haapala) wrote:
>To be fair to USWest, I did another Email asking more specifically,
>"Just tell me what I am connecting to, and I'll do the rest", as
>opposed to a more generic question about Linux, and got this nice
>reply:
>
> USWEST.net Technical Support can give you the specific information
> you are looking for. If you are asking 'How do I connect my Linux
> box to USWEST.net', our Technicians are not going to be able to
> assist you as they are not trained in configuring any Linux dialup.
> I thank you for asking for specific information, as that information,
> I can give you.
> All dialup access is through Cisco or Ascend routers to a FreeBSD
> Unix box. Authentication should be PAP, not CHAP. If you use CHAP,
> the connection will fail. As far as scripts, USWEST.net doesn't use
> scripts for connections on any other platform, so I would guess there
> is no script need on Linux either (I could be mistaken, as this is an
> assumption made by me). You may wish to check out the Internet for
> configurations for a dialup using the Linux OS, and what is needed.
>
> Thank you for contacting USWEST.net
>
> Technical Support
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>I am now successfully connecting my Linux box to uswest.net.
Ah, so there are actually a few people floating around within the
US West support staff that know something about what they're
talking about.
At least it's something...and it's a lot better than much of the information,
or misinformation, I've gotten from their techs regarding DSL service.
SS
------------------------------
From: Thomas Zajic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Incorrect Password When Telneting
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 09:09:44 GMT
Tom Milliken wrote:
> I installed Red Hat 5.0 on a P133 w/32Mb. The network card is working fine.
> When I try to telnet or rlogin with a user other than root, I get "incorrect
> password". My hosts.allow is set to allow local telnet. I can connect to the
> web server installed on this computer just fine. I have not set up SAMBA yet
> to see if this works. Any suggestions?
How: rm /etc/nologin
Why: man 5 nologin
Thomas
--
=---------------------------------------------------------------------=
- Thomas Zajic aka ZlatkO ThE GoDFatheR, Vienna/Austria -
- Spam-proof e-mail: thomas(DOT)zajic(AT)teleweb(DOT)at -
=---------------------------------------------------------------------=
------------------------------
From: "Dazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 2 modems - how do I multilink?
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 17:02:26 +1100
I have 2 modems and have been trying to use them to dialin to my isp as an
multilink connection. They both connect, but only one of them sends and
recieves.
------------------------------
From: "Robin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: modem init
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 14:37:15 -0600
Hi,
Recently I was messing with /dev/nvram (I tried to write something to it),
but all that kappened was it used 99% of my cpu, so I killed the process. I
went about business as normal, and later recompiled my kernel. After
rebooting, I found that my modem would no longer initialize. I stuck it in
my mom's win98 computer (what I'm using now) and it worls fine. I'm not sure
if I fried my BIOS or if some setting is just wacked out. Can anyone help me
with this? TIA!
Josh
P.S. Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], because I don't subscribe to these
groups.
------------------------------
From: "Robin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: modem init
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 14:37:15 -0600
Hi,
Recently I was messing with /dev/nvram (I tried to write something to it),
but all that kappened was it used 99% of my cpu, so I killed the process. I
went about business as normal, and later recompiled my kernel. After
rebooting, I found that my modem would no longer initialize. I stuck it in
my mom's win98 computer (what I'm using now) and it worls fine. I'm not sure
if I fried my BIOS or if some setting is just wacked out. Can anyone help me
with this? TIA!
Josh
P.S. Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED], because I don't subscribe to these
groups.
------------------------------
From: Joerg Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OS Discovery progarm
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 07:07:52 +0100
"nmap" (a portscanner) has this ability...
I forgot the URL....
Dan Davis wrote:
> I once found the source for a program that used ICMP packets to do os
> discovery. Anybody know what I'm talking about? I'm trying to find it
> again.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Dan
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 22:32:20 -0800
From: Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Where can I find source for utilities?
> and binaries of system utilities. Where can one find the source to the
> utilities? I'm currently looking into some syslogd problems we're having and
Same place the distribution came from. For example, for RedHat 5.2, sources are on the
second CD. Or if you know your distribution, version and hardware try
http://rufus.w3.org/linux/RPM/Distribs.html
> the source would be a Good Thing.
Probably not in this case.
--
[Replies: remove the D]
"Everything is permitted. Nothing is forbidden."
WS Burroughs.
------------------------------
From: Stephen Carville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS and dynamic IP address
Date: 4 Feb 1999 06:27:47 GMT
John Baron wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >all you need is a steady hostname on the server (or if
> >the server has a static ip, who cares what your own ip
> >address is.)
> >mount srv0:/usr /mnt/usr
>
> But in order for my system to have permission from the
> server to mount the filesystems, doesn't the server have
> to know the IP address of my machine, which will change
> on a regular basis?
Only if the directories are exported with some restriction that requires a
reverse DNS. NFS, as rule does not check the IP address of the machine
doing a mount.
Also, your IP will not change until you shut down.
--
Stephen Carville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====================================================
Management: The art of hiring intelligent, skilled individuals and then
ignoring their advice.
------------------------------
From: Craig Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: route: netmask doesn't match route address
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 06:42:46 GMT
Jerry Guy wrote:
>
> Craig Lucas wrote:
>
> > when I run the /etc/rc.d/init.d/network start command I get a message
> > saying "route: netmask doesn't match route address" and then some lines
> > on Usage.
> >
> > can anyone help me with this?
> >
> > newbe
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Show your route table. (netstat -nr) or route
I have a single-homed (one NIC) system setup with a cable modem
cat /etc/sysconfig/network
NETWORKING=yes
FORWARD_IPV4=no
HOSTNAME="c67809-b"
GATEWAYDEV=eth0
GATEWAY=24.1.24.1
That's it for the network file, should there be a netmask in there?
route -F
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
24.1.24.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 3 eth0
127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2 lo
default 24.1.24.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 4 eth0
ifconfig
etho Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr (address is correct)
inet addr:24.1.24.38 Bcast:24.1.24.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
(all the other stuff here..................................)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Configuring Netscape
Date: 4 Feb 1999 10:32:10 GMT
Hello...I have just purchased a book "SAMS Learn Linux in 24 hours", which contained
the
RedHat 5.0 version of Linux. I tried to follow their instructions on how to
install Netscape, but after using 'gunzip', I cannot get Netscape to install.
What should I do? It shows up as a file directory under root when I enter the
command 'ls'; which is, I find 'netscape' and 'netscape@' listed. How might I
install this browser?
thank you,
~Dan Brown
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tobias Reckhard (jester))
Subject: Re: ipfwadm questions
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 10:22:41 GMT
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999 13:07:07 -0500, Fulton B. Gonzalez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've managed to enable packet forwarding via the command /sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m
>-S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0; this enables me to telnet and do email from any
>of the machines in my network to the outside world. However, I can't seem to
>get netscape to work! Every time I try to access a web site, I get an error
>message to the effect that my request has been rejected. I thought that I had
>configured everything correctly, based on the ip forwarding docs which I had
>read.
>
>Are there any ipfwadm switches or parameters that I missed which would enable
>me to forward www packets?
No. HTTP packets are just like telnet and SMTP packets, they just use
different destination (server) ports. Where Telnet uses TCP port 23
and SMTP TCP port 25, HTTP uses TCP port 80, usually. Your ipfwadm
rules are the most generic masquerading rules available and web access
should work, especially if telnet and email work. You've probably
misconfigured the Netscape client. For instance, you do *not* want to
set the masquerading box as a proxy, unless you have a proxy running
on it. IP masquerading is *not* a proxy.
Tobias
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Will Linux work with a Cable Modem???
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 23:40:43 -0800
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> > I was also wondering, and am pretty sure that Windows 95 computers can
> > network to the modem via a hub to the linux server via TCP/IP????
>
> Yes, they can. You need to configure your Linux box with IPMasquarading.
> Then on the WIN 95 boxes, in the network setup configuration, set the
> gateway to the linux box IP address.
There have been several threads about how to set up a linux box to act as
a masquerading firewall for a home network connecting to the Internet via
<insert high speed technology's name here>. Check out the ones in
January on www.dejanews.com. Check out the HOWTO's and mini-HOWTO's at
www.linux.org (under support) that have to do with DHCP, DNS, Firewall,
NET3, etc.
> > Can I also sell off bandwith by having
> > friends dial in to my cable modem access? I might want to become my own
> > ISP =)
> >
>
> Don't think so. My cable modem setup by the ISP required the hardwired MAS
> address on the network card. This is unique to every card manufactured.
> In other words, your cable modem account can only talk with your specific
> network card.
My ISP doesn't care about my NIC's MAC address. It's my cable modem
proper that cares. So, if I change NIC, I power down the cable modem for
at least 60 seconds in order to *really* erase the volatile memory. Then,
on power up, the modem sees the new NIC and presto.
I think he means having his friends dial his linux box on a (cough) phone
modem. I suspect that somewhere in your contract with ComCast it will say
that you are prohibited from reselling the service and from becoming a
competitor of theirs. It also probably says that if your usage impedes
the ability for others to enjoy the "service' then they can take
unilateral (and swift) action.
--
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: "softalk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux DNS Server software ???
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 10:09:18 -0000
Linux beginner
Please does anyone know of (or how to) use a Linux box on a 64k leased line
as a DNS server ?.
I wish to host several domain names on the same computer is this possible ?.
They will also need email.
I have been allocated 16 IP's by my ISP. do I need to use these ?.
Am I totally stupid or what ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Kimoto)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: named addresses
Date: 4 Feb 1999 07:23:23 GMT
In article <79a7ii$7ih$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joe Keane wrote:
> Is there some way to tell `named' which addresses to listen on?
> This is on RH 5.1 if it matters.
Does Red Hat use BIND 8? It lets you put a statement like
listen-on { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.1.100; };
in /etc/named.conf.
------------------------------
From: Craig Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: route: netmask doesn't match route address
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 21:40:43 GMT
when I run the /etc/rc.d/init.d/network start command I get a message
saying "route: netmask doesn't match route address" and then some lines
on Usage.
can anyone help me with this?
newbe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott W. Petesen)
Subject: Re: Need Kinston KNE20PnP driver
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 22:08:25 GMT
Use the software that came with the disk to disable plug and play.
set an irq and an address for the card.
I think that card is ne2000? I may be wrong.
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999 17:26:35 GMT, Sean Pearce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Does anyone have a Linux driver for the Kinston Ethernet card KNE 20
>PnP, or similar cards (As I am resonably new to Linux installation
>instructions would be useful)
>
>Thanks
>
>Sean Pearce
>
>PS: I use SuSE
>
====================================
Scott W. Petersen - N9SLA
Web Page: www.wwa.com/~scooter
Elgin, IL - USA
ICQ 8287204
Packet E-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====================================
PLEASE note e-mail address is scooter @ wwa.com
------------------------------
From: "J.S. Mammen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux DNS Server software ???
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 15:08:52 +0400
You will need to setup bind
_____________________________________________
http://www.jminfotech.com
http://uaecompany.hypermart.net
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
