Linux-Networking Digest #196, Volume #10 Sat, 13 Feb 99 21:14:28 EST
Contents:
Re: High availability secondaray DNS system (James Youngman)
Re: Advice Required: Cable Modem in mixed Linux/MacOS Network (Clinton Pierce)
Can I setup a standalone Apache Server?? (Qiang Wan)
RH 5.1 netcfg and rtl8139 probs ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux as Mac Proxy (Kelvin Leung)
Re: Netscape 4.8/Redhat 5.2 just hangs very often (Hans Wolters)
connection refused (James Ranson)
Re: Ah, come on! Solaris is looking better that Linux! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
yet another mail question... (Josh Rusko)
telnet: Was my system hacked? (GenaBlu)
Re: Problem: Netscape cannot see any host? (Mike DuFresne)
Re: External ISDN modem ("Cj.Spaans")
Re: Netscape 4.8/Redhat 5.2 just hangs very often (J. Scott Berg)
Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux (Bob Nelson)
Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Winsock client for linux ??? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: linux firewall and ICQ ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Help needed on home LAN ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: James Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: High availability secondaray DNS system
Date: 13 Feb 1999 00:49:58 +0000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Rose) writes:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Our company runs a "privat Internet" (Intranet?) distributed all over Germany;
> it is not connected to *THE* Internet. We have
> one primary DNS-Server and more than ten secondaries. The secondaries are
> now realized by HP-clusters, formerly used to serve several services apart from
> DNS.
> The HPs will be removed whithin the next weeks. Thereafter, the secondary DNS
> service is planned to be handled by Linux-boxes. Two Linux computers shall
> be responsible for one secondary name service: one as the main
> secondary DNS server
> (MS), the otherone as the backup secondary (BS) DNS server
> (that is what our chiefs want).
>
> So the MS shall handle all DNS requests. If it crashes, BS takes over the
> IP-adr. from
> MS.
>
> Is this possible with Eddieware? Or do I need sth. different?
No, it works out of the box anyway, because that is the way that BIND
is designed to operate.
Clients should just list all 3 DNS servers in /etc/resolv.conf. DNS
server A is authoritative and the master. Server B is secondary to
it. C is also secondary to it, but it doesn't matter much if is
slaves off A or B. Ditto for D through Z etc, if required.
--
ACTUALLY reachable as @free-lunch.demon.(whitehouse)co.uk:james+usenet
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clinton Pierce)
Subject: Re: Advice Required: Cable Modem in mixed Linux/MacOS Network
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 17:04:15 GMT
On Mon, 08 Feb 1999 16:03:20 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'd like some advice from some linux networking gurus please. :-)
Not a guru here. Just banging my head against similar kinds of rocks.
>The cable modem provider can only answer questions about installing it in a
>[..] Then add my Linux/Mac network at a later date [..]
Good plan.
>I plan on buying a 100Base-T HUB with 4+ ports (1 for the Linux Box, 1 for the
>cable modem and 2 for the PowerMacs). Any advice over a good HUB that needs
>minimal setup and doesn't require a Windows box to connect to?
Hubs (especially the 5, 8 port ones) are commodity items. Pick one.
Also, there's generally nothing to set up with a hub. Just start
plugging in.
>Final question: Am I right in assuming that the Linux box can act as a proxy
>server for the two powermacs hanging off of the hub? The macs don't need to be
>using Appletalk to talk to the Linux box and can use TCP/IP quite happily. If
>not will I have to use Samba, Dave, or some other combination of software to
>get the macs to use the linux box as a proxy to the internet?
The Linux box will happily act as a proxy for the two Macs, or you can
go with something more exotic like IP Masquerading. Your choice, and
neither is too hard. Things to be aware of:
1. Your Linux box will have two network cards in it. (one to plug
into the hub/LAN, the other into the Cable modem). Have the drivers
ready, compiled into the kernel and ready to go. If you can put the
second card in ahead of time and test it, it'll save some time. Be
aware that Linux often doesn't autoprobe for a second card (unless you
tell it to) and you may have to resolve IRQ/Memory conflicts. If
they're going to give you an enternet card, beware of PlugNPlay cards
in your Linux box and all that entails.
2. (this one is biting me) If you have two ethernet cards, you need a
dhcpcd of at least version 1.3, if your Cable-Modem provider uses DHCP
and most do. Version 0.7 will NOT work with two ethernet cards in the
machine. Version 1.3 only works if you've got a kernel version
better than 2.1.70 (includes 2.2). This means, that if you're going
to wind up using DHCP and have two ether cards, plan on compiling a
newer kernel.
>Thanks in advance. (sorry if these are dumb questions - I have been trying to
>find out the answers myself but now it's time to spend $ I want to make sure
>I've got it right).
Yessirree bob. Good plan.
------------------------------
From: Qiang Wan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can I setup a standalone Apache Server??
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 18:49:03 -0500
Hi,there:
I am a beginner to Linux network setup and I tried to setup an Apache
web server on my PC. Is that possible for me to run an standalone Apache
as a server for Netscape in my PC without connecting to internet. Do I had to
get a IP address and domain name for my PC in order to run Apache. Is there any way
that I can
emulate an "fake" IP address just for stand alone use within a PC. Or if I had
to get a IP address, how can I get a IP and what is the cost?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Qiang
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RH 5.1 netcfg and rtl8139 probs
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:31:18 GMT
Okay, I'm very new to Linux so please bear with me.
I have a P100/32mb/5.1gb pc with two SmartLink 10/100 ethernet cards
installed. Eventually I hope to set the machine up as a router and mailhost
and another machine I have to become an Apache server.
Right now I'm having two problems. First I can get the network cards to work
and ping other machines on my small network, however, I cannot ping anything
on the internet (I'm going through another router). Since I can't ping
anything, Netscape can't resolve name etc. leaving me with my default (local)
page.
The second problem I have is my Smartlink cards are based on rtl8139 chips. I
have the module but want to load it automatically at boot time - I'm getting
tired already of typing the module path. My instructions indicate I should
modify a file '/etc/rc.d/inet1' to add the loading instructions.
Unfortunately, I cannot find any 'inet1' file in the 'rc.d' directory.
I have set, for now, ne0 to 192.168.0.30 and ne1 to 192.168.0.31. My router's
address is 192.168.0.1 and all have the same netmask of 255.255.255.0. The
network is set to 192.168.0.0/24 and the broadcast address is 255.255.0.255.
My nameservers (at my ISP) are set in the names window of netcfg.
I have several books but they generally give cursory information regarding the
configuration.
First:
I presently have my Hostname set to localhost and the domain set to that of my
ISP - is this correct?
Second: I don't have any other machines on my network that are currently
hosting so do I leave my "Hosts" blank (except default 127.0.0.1) blank?
Third: I had a blank interface listed with no IP or interface setup. I
deleted this as it did not seem to have any importance (nor did it correct my
problem when I deleted it). Was this just an anomaly or did I just screw up.
Fourth & finally:
Where do I look to find the 'inet1' or equivalent file?
Thanks for any and all help,
Scott
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kelvin Leung)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.powerpc,comp.os.linux.setup,alt.os.linux.caldera
Subject: Re: Linux as Mac Proxy
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:23:59 -0700
try the netatalk package. Search netatalk in yahoo.com. It works really
great. Printer server, file server. For internet sharing , you may need
ipmasq, go to sunsite.unc.edu/mdw , documentation section, you'll see the
documents and the related links. Good luck.
Kelvin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Hanna) wrote:
> I just read the president of Caldera said that Linux makes a great proxy
> and print server for Macs. We might be setting up a lab of iMacs soon and
> I have an extra 486 hanging around. I also have an older copy of Caldera
> Linux on a CD-ROM.
>
> Somebody point me to a resource that can show me how to do this? Thanks,
Michael
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hans Wolters)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.misc,alt.netscape,a2000.comp.software.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Netscape 4.8/Redhat 5.2 just hangs very often
Date: 14 Feb 1999 00:46:50 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ville Nummela wrote:
:On 13 Feb 1999, Hans Wolters wrote:
:
:> :Best and cleanest thing would be to recompile with my own libraries then.
:> :I think the source code was available, but maybe only to a selected group
:> :of people?
:> :I also dont know where to find it.
:> Download the 4.5 version. It's more stable.
:
:And has some javascript security holes which allow a web server maintainer
:to brewse your harddisk. 4.08 does not have ....
Could you point me to an URL that covers the topic?
Regards Hans
--
Java Search Engine Front End
http://home.gelrevision.nl/~h.wolter/
Linux Links/CMI8330 Soundpro HOWTO
http://home.gelrevision.nl/~h.wolter/linux.htm
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Ranson)
Subject: connection refused
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 00:41:53 GMT
I am trying to access W95 shares from my Linux box. I tried to use:
smbclient -L server
but it said:
Connecting to 10.0.0.1:139 [connection refused]
The IP address is right. Pings work both ways. What is going on?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ah, come on! Solaris is looking better that Linux!
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 18:06:14 GMT
On 11 Feb 1999 20:57:04 GMT, r d t@c s.q u e e n s u.c a (Bob Tennent)
wrote:
>On 11 Feb 1999 02:34:45 GMT, Penn Stater wrote:
> >
> >I installed Red Hat 5.2 in my P100 w/ 64 MB of RAM. The network card is a 3Com
> >Etherlink III (3C509B). I disabled the plug and play feature of the card.
> >
> >The card is working because I can see packets flying across the network both to
> >and from my Linux box.
> >
> >But I cannot establish any kind of connections, whether they are to or from
> >Linux. I've tried ftp, http, rlogin, ping, telnet, and others. Requests always
> >go out, the programs never time out, but connections are never established.
> >
>You give virtually nothing of any use in debugging your problem.
>Is your card detected by the kernel? What do you get if you do
>ifconfig? Have you tried to use netcfg? Have you really read
>the NET-3-HOWTO and the Network Administrators Guide?
>
>If you want help, you've got to ask the right questions, not just whine.
>
>Bob T.
don't you have vetrin vs newby posts. You are corect but let's be
polite to the newcommers
------------------------------
From: Josh Rusko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: yet another mail question...
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 14:53:02 GMT
I know I've been posting alot these past few days, but I have
(hopefully) my last question for a while. I had a dual boot system that
ran as a mail server while running linux. Everything worked fine,
sending mail from Netscape, Eudora, etc. clients on my home LAN. Now I
have a dedicated Linux machine, running as the mail server. POP3 mail
retrieval works, but sending mail from Netscape or whatever results in a
"relaying denied" message. I know I had it working before, and I have no
idea how to fix this without allowing relaying to the world (it will
also serve mail for remote clients). any ideas?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (GenaBlu)
Subject: telnet: Was my system hacked?
Date: 12 Feb 1999 18:29:47 GMT
Good morning!
I've been connecting to my Linux boxes using Windows' telnet for the longest
time. Then, a couple of days ago, it stopped working. Just like that. I was
logged on to my Linux box, then closed the connection for a few minutes, then
tried again and it didn't work. Here are the symptoms:
1. I can connect to the server (I can see it using netstat), the "Red Hat Linux
Kernel 2.0.35 on an i586" screen appears, but I get no login prompt.
2. My servers and workstation are in the same LAN, and share consecutive IP
addresses and gateway.
3. My DNS is provided by my DSL vendor for now, but that's bound to change; I'm
using canonical IP addresses to connect (x.y.z.w) so I don't think I have
reverse-lookup problems.
4. I can't connect from Linux box to Linux box using telnet either. Now, the
funny thing is, people telnetting from outside the LAN can telnet just fine.
I shut the r* services off (yeah, I know) already. FTP, Samba, httpd, etc.
work just fine. It's only the telnetd that seems to be acting up.
I've been working my way down the CERT advisories and so far I haven't found
anything strange in my system; I'm getting nervously ready to re-install parts
or all of Linux if I can find that the systems were compromised, but I'd
appreciate if someone knows what might be wrong.
Please help! I try managing all of these machines from a couple of telnet
sessions so I don't have to physically switch among them.
Thanks for your help!
G
------------------------------
From: Mike DuFresne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problem: Netscape cannot see any host?
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 20:37:44 -0500
Ted wrote:
>
> Hi there!
>
> I installed my new SuSe 6.0 with KDE.
> I set up ppp and can dial in to my ISPs.
> I can even ping them and ping any other host on the net (if I use
> valid IP address).
> Still, my Netscape cannot connect to any site. It just brings message
> that host name cannot be found.
>
If you do a bit more reading, you'll see that you need to setup DNS. The
easiest way to get this to work properly is to edit /etc/resolv.conf and
add in the nameserver(s) for your isp.
mike
--
In the immortal words of Socrates, who said: 'I drank what?'
C. Knight
------------------------------
From: "Cj.Spaans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: External ISDN modem
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 02:39:50 +0100
I have an external ISDN-adpater, its only one channel and serial, but
when you want todo 128 or setting up two different connections, you
should use one that is connected with the printerport. this way you hav
128K and you can setup more connections.
Also external adapters are easer to use, because you can thread them like
an old fashion modem and don't need to patch the kernel for the support
for your adapter.
Hans
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999, Joel Chaney wrote:
> What about the 115k limit? I have a LavaPort-650 that I'm trying to configure.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin ) wrote:
>
> > In article <797c4t$ots$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Albert Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
> > >>Read the ISDN4Linux FAQ. It says there that you can connect with an
> > >external
> > >>ISDN modem as you would with an analog modem. I don't have an external ISDN
> > >>modem so I can't verify that.
> > >
> > >
> > >It works with my Elsa MicroLink ISDN/TLv.34, no problems whatsoever.
> > >
> >
> > Should work fine though you typically will have to put some extra setup
> > strings into your connect script - ISDN modems have rather more complex config
> > options than analog...
> >
> > Martin
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J. Scott Berg)
Crossposted-To:
linux.redhat.misc,alt.netscape,a2000.comp.software.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Netscape 4.8/Redhat 5.2 just hangs very often
Date: 14 Feb 1999 01:08:02 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jan Houtsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Ville Nummela wrote:
>
>> Well, it might be downgrading then. But remember that if you are using Red
>> Hat you should consider recompiling those libraries from the original
>> packages anyway, even though you are using the "same" version - Red Hat
>> tends to make their own modifications to about everything so you can't
>> expect any of the libraries that come with RH to be "standard".
>
>Just realized that the downloaded netscapes are all statically linked together,
>so no use to change any libraries whatsoever.
Really? The ones I have, which were downloaded a few months ago, are
all dynamically linked. I would be very happy if it weren't
dynamically linked, or at least if the only dynamic library were libc.
>> > Best and cleanest thing would be to recompile with my own libraries then.
Don't do it! Actually, in general it's a good idea, but it will
probably make Netscape crash. As far as I can tell, the glibc
Netscape is particularly finicky about having preciesly the libraries
that Redhat supplies (I think the culprit in my case is libstdc++). I
haven't been able to get it to work using my self-compiled libraries.
On of these days I'll get alien and download Redhat's RPM's for
libstdc++ and see if that lets me run Netscape. Right now I use a
libc5 version and have my old libc5 X11 libraries hidden off somewhere.
At least if you try to compile the libraries, make sure to keep the
old ones around.
-Scott Berg
------------------------------
From: Bob Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux
Date: 13 Feb 1999 19:40:41 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In comp.os.linux.misc Tat M. Leung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a computer currently running NT server using NTFS. I like to add a
> second harddisk to the computer and install RedHat Linux on this drive.
> The second harddisk will be used for Linux exclusively. I understand
> that if NT is using FAT, there would not be any problem. Since my
> system is using NTFS, can I install RedHat Linux on this system?
There's no problem (or in Redmond-speak, ``issue'') involving the
co-existence of Linux and peecee "nt" on the same computer. The newer
kernels -- and certainly the now official 2.2.* series -- provide
read (and optionally, write) support of the NTFS partition.
On my computer, I have all of the following managed by LILO:
1. Linux 2.2.1 (a mongrelized Redhat 5.2, with traces of sls still present)
2. Linux 2.0.29 (Caldera's Open Linux Lite)
3. Linux 0.99p12 (a legacy kernel to recall ``how it used to be'')
4. Solaris 2.6 (the promotional product from last autumn)
5. peecee "nt" 4.0/SP4 (booted ONLY when I need to remember just why
I switched to *nix)
- Note that the NTFS support (at least as kernel module) will leak
memory...slowly but surely. Be *sure* to exclude the NTFS partition
from your daily updatedb job since ``find'' on NTFS will globble
up a large chunk of memory, which can be reclaimed only be a
reboot (or in Redmond-speak, ``a refresh'').
- Since Microsoft's product is so poorly designed, simply submit to
its inadequacies and place it on the first partition on your
first hard drive. Subdivide its archaic ``drive letters'' thereafter
to other partitions across the same or others drives. As you
spend less time toying with peecee "nt", you'll surely want to
reclaim the space wasted on it for Linux. (What started as
four partitions for peecee "nt" is now down to just one in my
case).
- Be sure to install Linux *after* peecee "nt" performs its selfish
installation, clobbering LILO and everything else in its way. Then,
simply add a line to your lilo.conf pointing to the peecee "nt"
partition, viz:
boot = /dev/hda
map = /boot/map
install = /boot/boot.b
prompt
timeout = 50
vga = 3
image = /boot/zImage-2.2.1-oss
label = linux
root = /dev/hda5
read-only
image = /boot/zImage-2.1.130-oss
label = linux-back
root = /dev/hda5
read-only
image = /boot/vmlinuz-2.0.29-modular
label = caldera
root = /dev/hda8
read-only
image = /boot/kernel-0.99p12
label = linux-old
root = /dev/hdd1
read-only
other = /dev/hdc1
loader = /boot/chain.b
label = solaris
table = /dev/hdc
other = /dev/hda1
label = peecee-nt
table = /dev/hda
--
========================================================================
Bob Nelson -- Dallas, Texas, USA ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.oldradio.com/archives/nelson/open-computing.html
``Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.''
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 01:39:32 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andreas Schyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Esparza wrote:
> >
> > Have been reading quite a few of the HOWTO's lately trying to get
> > Redhat 5.2 installed on my machine. According to the Linux+NT-Loader
> > document, standard Linux can't access NTFS. BUT, to quote the document:
> >
> > "An alpha driver that can read NTFS-Partitions is available at
> >
> > http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~loewis/ntfs"
> >
>
> Looks like that HOW-TO is a bit old... The new kernel do come with a
> driver that is able to read from NTFS, but not write.
> Andreas.
>
Actually the new 2.2.x kernels include support for writing to NTFS partitions
as well but it is an experimental driver and they warn that it has the
potential of corupting your NTFS partition.
0ut(ast
Life would be a lot simpler if
we could just see the source code.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.winsock,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.apps.winsock.mail
Subject: Re: Winsock client for linux ???
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 18:27:51 GMT
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999 09:57:08 +0100, "Beno�t Cousson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'am trying to get Linux to see the Net though MSProxy 2.0?
>In MS enviroment I have a Proxy client to access most TCP/IP services (FTP,
>SMTP, POP3,...)
>
>Is there a client software for MS Proxy on linux???
>
>
>Thanx.
>
> Benoit.
I think it's called netscape.
edit:preferences:advanced:proxy settings might help
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: linux firewall and ICQ
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 18:10:37 GMT
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 17:27:27 -0500, "Robert L. Ziegler"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Gert Wurzer wrote:
>>
>> Does anybody know how to get icq working behind a linux
>> firewall?
>
>
>Try this. If it doesn't work, please let me know so that I can fix it
>in the examples.
>
>
> # ICQ client (4000)
> # -----------------
> ipfwadm -I -a accept -P tcp -k -W $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE \
> -S $ANYWHERE 2000:4000 \
> -D $IPADDR $UNPRIVPORTS
>
> ipfwadm -O -a accept -P tcp -W $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE \
> -S $IPADDR $UNPRIVPORTS \
> -D $ANYWHERE 2000:4000
>
> ipfwadm -I -a accept -P udp -W $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE \
> -S $ANYWHERE 4000 \
> -D $IPADDR $UNPRIVPORTS
>
> ipfwadm -O -a accept -P udp -W $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE \
> -S $IPADDR $UNPRIVPORTS \
> -D $ANYWHERE 4000
>
>
>Bob
now try the ipchains equiv...LOL
I'm trying to migrate to 2.2 but cant figure out the ipchains...
(not real good with ipfwadm eather)
tng
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help needed on home LAN
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 18:17:46 GMT
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999 12:25:25 +0900, Jo kou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
All looks well, are you sure you have a roll-over cable and not a
strate through cable?
>Hi! every body.
>
>I have some problems during I am setting my home LAN.
>Please give me advice for the following problem.
>Thanks.
>
>I am trying to connect two linux machines with
>10base-T ethernet cards and a crossed cable without a HUB,
>because I have only two computers. But it doesn't work.
>Do you think that it is a hardware problem ?
>Telnet to local host is working well on both linux boxes.
>The response of telnet to remote host is:
>
>$telnet 192.168.1.1 %from second computer
>telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host
>
>
>I don't know the reason. Now waiting for your help.
>My hardware look working well, because LED on each boards
>turned on when I turn on the main switch of the computer and
>LED will off when I pull out the ethernet cable.
>The responses of some TCP/IP LAN related commands for the two
>computer like bellows:
>
>
>First computer:
>
>#result of "ifconfig" command:
>lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:110 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:110 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 coll:0
>
>eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:C0:26:11:B6:CF
> inet addr:192.168.1.1 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 coll:0
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xfca0
>
>#result of "route" command:
>
>Kernel IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
>Iface
>localnet * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1
>eth0
>loopback * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2
>lo
>
>#result of "more /proc/interrupts"
>
> 0: 44870 timer
> 1: 671 keyboard
> 2: 0 cascade
> 6: 28 + floppy
> 8: 1 + rtc
>10: 9 eth0
>13: 1 math error
>14: 3051 + ide0
>15: 0 + ide1
>
>
>
>Second computer:
>
>#result of "ifconfig" command:
>
>lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:21 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:21 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> Collisions:0
>
>eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:90:CC:A0:BD:92
> inet addr:192.168.1.2 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> Collisions:0
> Interrupt:3 Base address:0x300
>
>
>#result of "route" command:
>
>Kernel IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
>Iface
>localnet * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1
>eth0
>loopback * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2
>lo
>
>#result of "more /proc/interrupts":
>
> 0: 68877 timer
> 1: 3088 keyboard
> 2: 0 cascade
> 3: 10 NE2000
> 6: 43 + floppy
> 8: 1 + rtc
>12: 1365 PS/2 Mouse
>13: 0 math error
>14: 24790 + ide0
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
