Linux-Networking Digest #211, Volume #10         Mon, 15 Feb 99 03:13:55 EST

Contents:
  Re: Nws.net free DDNS users: Did it stop working? ("Kim Gross")
  Re: Fetchmail/procmail question (L J Bayuk)
  Re: ipfwadm: Deny or Reject? (Tobias Reckhard (jester))
  best setup? (Roger Bondie)
  Re: PPP dies after modem 8 bit not clean ("Rob Edman")
  LAN network and Cable modem (root)
  Re: routing via portnr (Luca Filipozzi)
  Re: Internetzugang einrichten (Robert Janik)
  Internet Connection ("Olivier Mar�chal")
  rpms for ssh on RH5.2 (Partha Sri)
  Re: Thinking about Promise FasTrak and Netgear 10/100's (Eric Turner)
  Re: Samba & Win 98 (Christian Aasland)
  Re: PPP problems (Rob Shinn)
  Re: 3c905 problems?? (Paul A. Cheshire)
  Re: rpms for ssh on RH5.2 (Izak Burger)
  DNS Questions? (Brian Lavender)
  Re: 10/100 Ethernet SWITCH (to be used for Fast Ethernet LAN, and  10-BaseT cable 
modem) (Mark Hahn)
  Re: hacked login ("Karsten M. Self")
  IP Masquerading and Netmeeting (Chris Russell)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: "Kim Gross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Nws.net free DDNS users: Did it stop working?
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 22:23:40 -0700

This is why I broke down and signed up with TZO.  The price is not to bad I
think $50 a year + internic fees and I have my own domain name running off
of my DSL account.


Kim Gross


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<9HMx2.2975$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Do-Hoon Kwon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>: Hello,
>:  I've registered my machine at http://www.nws.net and have been enjoing
>: its free dynamic dns service for a while. However, it stopped resolving
>: for me about 4 days ago. The address registration program (regaddr)
>: reports successful DDNS update. Their webpage does not list any
>: problem, either.

> Hmm, get what we pay for..
>
>




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (L J Bayuk)
Subject: Re: Fetchmail/procmail question
Date: 14 Feb 1999 22:49:05 GMT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to use fetchmail and procmail to download my mail from my
>ISP and sort mail that came from mailing lists into the appropriate
>folder. I managed to do the download thing, but all mail ends up in
>my main mail box (/var/spool/mail/juergen).
>
>My .fetchmailrc looks like this:
>>-------SNIP-------<
>poll mail.paconline.net:
>protocol POP3
>user juergen with with pass mypassword
>mda "/usr/bin/procmail -d juergen"
>set daemon 300
>>-------SNIP-------<
>
>and my .procmailrc looks like that:
>>-------SNIP-------<
>:0:
>* ^To:*ppp
>/usr/home/juergen/mail/Linux-PPP  
>
>:0:
>* ^To:*kde*
>/usr/home/juergen/mail/KDE
>>-------SNIP-------<
>
>But even if the 'To' lines contain 'ppp' or 'kde', the mails
>aren't moved to the appropriate folders. The mail folders exist -
>at the moment, I'm copying my mail there manually.
>Could someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong?

Basic setup looks OK; I think your patterns aren't matching.
Are you sure the To: lines don't just have your own name
when procmail sees it? Try filtering on ^Sender or something
else.

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tobias Reckhard (jester))
Subject: Re: ipfwadm: Deny or Reject?
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 20:37:16 GMT

On Sat, 13 Feb 1999 23:34:41 GMT, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>What is the difference between REJECT and DENY in ipfwadm?

Reject triggers an ICMP message to the sender of the offending packet,
saying "destination unreachable". Deny suppresses that, silently
dumping the packet. Often, deny is preferred, because it gives the
potential attacker no information, it's as if the destination host
didn't exist at all.

Tobias

------------------------------

From: Roger Bondie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: best setup?
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 18:12:05 -0500

Ok I have just recently found Linux (Redhat 5.2) and love it. I have
been tinkering with computers since TS1000's where all the rage. And
linux does some much stuff that I'm unsure of how to ...

Here's what I have a PII 333 with 6.4G, 64Mram Ne2000 compatible card
and external 56K modem running linux only, I blew windows  98 away the
last time it crashed and gave all the hard drive space to linux and  I
have a 386DX33 with 540M, 8M ram Ne2000 compatible card . And a 5 port
hub.

What I mostly do is surf the net with the PII running redhat and I am
learning C++ programming  and my kids play games and occasionally do
homework on the 386 running WFWG 3.1 (Yes I know that this box could run
linux but the video dosen't run X very well (crashes alot probably due
to a crude vga video card). Both are connected to there own printers.

OK I'll get to the point I would like to give the kids net access
through my box. And while both boxes have net cards they are not being
used at this time just because there isn't any need to share
printers or files. Can I do this and if so point me in the right
direction. One more thing is that I have promised my kids another
computer in the near future so they can quit fighting over the one 386.


------------------------------

From: "Rob Edman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help
Subject: Re: PPP dies after modem 8 bit not clean
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 16:23:44 -0800

There is a section on this message in the PPP-HOWTO
heres a link:
http://www.ssc.com/linux/LDP/HOWTO/PPP-HOWTO-18.html#ss18.3


john -r s wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have been trying to work my way through many problems setting up PPP
>and have so far done ok.  Now I am at a loss as I get a connection
>going only to find it dies after a few seconds with the message:\
>
>Recieve serial link is not 8-bit clean:
>Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
>
>Can anyone help me????
>
>Thanks in advance!
>
>-jrs
>
>



------------------------------

From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: LAN network and Cable modem
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 18:25:04 -0500

I am new to linux and have been working for days to set up a network
with a linux box connected to the internet.  I hoped to have the linux
box distribute internet access to all of the computers on my LAN using
IPMasq. or something similar.  The problem is my cable modem and
LAN both use ethernet cards and when I have the card connecting the box
to the LAN, DHCP fails at bootup for my cable modem.  Does anyone know
why this would be happening, or if it might be happening because my two
ethernet cards are from the same manufactuer.


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Subject: Re: routing via portnr
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 14:20:02 -0800

In article <7a4n7h$img$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Hello!
> I hope that i am not OT.
> I have a simple question:
> can linux route a tcp/ip via the port ?
> I neet an solution because i ve got the following problem:
> I have on tcp/ip address lets say 192.168.10.10
> and i have 2 comps with 2 different services.
> let me say serv1 has got www on port 80
> and serv 2 has got ftp on port 21
> and of cause one linuxbox ;)
> the problem is that it is not possible to have both
> services on one simple comp. Also it is not possible to have more
> than one tcp/ip address. Why i cant run both services on one comp
> and why i haven t got 2 ip is to long for thes posting :-) And the services
> are only
> for explaining...
> So i thougt that i can make one linuxbox, with 3 ethernetcards
> one for serv1, one for serv2 and one for the ip in the world...
> The only different for routing is the coming portnr.
> so if i have a get of 192.168.10.10:21 the box routes to card2 (serv2), gets
> the service and give it back with the anweraddress 192.168.10.10:21
> if a packet comes with the address 192.168.10.10:80
> linux should route it to
> the card1 (serv1) and send the service back with the answeradress
> 168.192.10.10.:80
> I hope thats explain my question.
> Of cause i need the ip masquarading for linux to because
> i shoult seems like one comp :-) for <the world> witch is in fact an
> intranet.
> Hope one of you can help me. THanks a lot !
> 
> by
> torsten
> 
> 
> 
Yes, linux can forward packets based on port number. Take a look at 
ipautofw and ipportfw. These are standard packages for Debian and should 
be standard with RH as well (I'm assuming you are using RH).

Hope this helps,

Luca
-- 
Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Janik)
Subject: Re: Internetzugang einrichten
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:01:28 +0100

Dirk Krutenberg schrieb in Nachricht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...

Hi!

[problems with kppp]

Versuche es erstmal von Hand mit einem ppp-on- bzw. -off-script.
Beschrieben z.B. in diversen HowTos unter /usr/doc/howto (PPP- und
ISP-HookUp-HowTo).
Abgesehen davon solltest Du in dieser Gruppe Deine Englisch-Kenntnisse
rauskramen.

Vorsichtshalber F'Up2 d.c.o.u.l.n.

Robert







------------------------------

From: "Olivier Mar�chal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Internet Connection
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 20:37:37 +0100

I want to use internet with my Linux.

I  create a PPP connection and i select this option 'allow any user
(de)activate the interface'

Well, now, how can i, when i'm not root, open and close my connection.

Thanks for your responses.

Olivier



------------------------------

From: Partha Sri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rpms for ssh on RH5.2
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 17:15:43 -0600
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi:

Can anyone tell me where to find rpms for ssh/ssh2 for RH5.2 ??

thanks
Partha


------------------------------

From: Eric Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Thinking about Promise FasTrak and Netgear 10/100's
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 16:20:12 -0800

I have the Netgear 10/100 FA310TX network card and it works flawlessly!
(at 10 Mbps at least, haven't had a chance to try it at 100). It uses
the Tulip drivers which can be compiled into the kernel or loaded as a
module.

Eric

Michael wrote:
> 
> Hi:
> 
> I am trying to determine whether there are drivers and experience with the
> following
> cards:
> 
> Promise  FasTrak with multiple drives either as RAID or large partition.
> Bay Networks Netgear 10/100BaseTX NIC FA310TX
> 
> I want to get some feedback before I commit money ;-)
> 
> Thanks in advance.  Please reply direct, ISP news server seems to loose
> messages.
> Would appreciate a suggestions on a Linux and/or general news server.
> 
> Michael
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
My public PGP key is available from hkp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free PGP software is available from http://bs.mit.edu:8001/pgp-form.html

------------------------------

From: Christian Aasland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba & Win 98
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 21:18:36 GMT

hm, did that (enabled encrypted passwords) but it still won't work... I'm
assuming
that I'm supposed to use the password associated with the profile I logged onto
win98 with?

Ed Karjala wrote:

> enable encrypted passwords in your smb.conf file or make the reg change on
> the Win98 machine as already stated.  Be aware that this will be less secure
> than using encrypted passwords.
>
> Scallica wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Hey,
> >
> >I can't seem to map a network drive in Win 98. It keeps saying "password
> >incorrect". I can map to the linux machine perfectly on a Win 95 machine.
> >On the Win 98 machine, I log in at startup, but when I try to map, it
> prompts
> >for a password but will not accept it. Any ideas? Thanx.

--
Christian Aasland - BRMS/400 Development
1-507-253-0776, TL:553-0776
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: Rob Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: PPP problems
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 19:49:05 GMT

Make sure you have your nameserver defined in /etc/resolv.conf.




------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul A. Cheshire)
Subject: Re: 3c905 problems??
Date: 14 Feb 1999 23:07:53 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sat, 13 Feb 1999 22:40:16 -0800,
Dad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have RH5.2 linux and the 3c905 PCI card. When I switch from Windows
>NT4.0 wihtout cycling the power, the driver cannot see the card. Even if
>I do, the card stays at 10Mb/sec. I can tell because I have an 8 port
>10/100 switch (not hub) that shows a status light when speed is 100Mb.
>When I run NT on the box, the card is at 100Mb.
>
>Any suggestions??

Had a very similar peroblem myself where the 3c905(B, in my case) would hang in
Linux after a few days use or heavy network traffic - especially over-the-wire
backups. This despite using latest driver module (RH 5.1 2.0.34). Even with
debugging on all I got was complaints that the were giant-sized packets. It
seems to me like memory leakage of some sort, or garbage collection. I finally
gave up and swapped it with a 3c515 from my wife's win98 box. Both are now
working faultlessly at 100mbs through a Netgear 8 port 100mbs hub (no option
for 10mbs).

I kept reading some mention of patches for the vortex driver but was not able
to find them. I hope you have more luck.

HTH

Paul


-- 
Windows: I can play Doom       | Paul A. Cheshire
Linux: I can be a file, web    | mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
and news server AND play Doom. | url: http://www.nader.demon.co.uk

------------------------------

From: Izak Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: rpms for ssh on RH5.2
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 01:29:34 +0200

ftp://archive.sun.ac.za/sites/ftp.replay.com/pub/replay/redhat (I think)

This is a local mirror over here at uni in South Africa.  You might
however try the real ftp.replay.com.

regards
Izak

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
                                ----==-- _                
                                ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __
Microsoft is not the answer.    --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /
Microsoft is the question.      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\
Linux is the answer: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Partha Sri wrote:

> Hi:
> 
> Can anyone tell me where to find rpms for ssh/ssh2 for RH5.2 ??
> 
> thanks
> Partha
> 
> 
> 


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Lavender)
Subject: DNS Questions?
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 22:10:35 GMT

Luca,

I succesfully configured the DNS caching server and the linux.bogus as
described in the DNS-HOWTO. I am excited about accomplishing this
task, yet I have a couple unanswered questions.

My dsl connection gives me a static ip, but the ISP has a name
resolved to it. You can see (below) that if I do a reverse dns lookup
on it, it will return the pacbell name. I am planning to run a primary
DNS on my machine and reconfigure brie.com to point to it. The dns on
my machine will "resolve" www, ftp and so forth. When someone does a
reverse dns lookup on 207.212.133.10 will they get
adsl-207-212-133-10.dsl.pacbell.net or brie.com or both? Will this
create problems?

  $ nslookup
  > 207.212.133.10
  Server:  localhost
  Address:  127.0.0.1
 
  Name:    adsl-207-212-133-10.dsl.pacbell.net
  Address:  207.212.133.10

  When both are aliases to the same ip will it give

  $ nslookup
  > 207.212.133.10
  Server:  localhost
  Address:  127.0.0.1

  Name:    brie.com 
  Name:    adsl-207-212-133-10.dsl.pacbell.net
  Address:  207.212.133.10

Second question. I noticed in the DNS HOWTO in the zone file for linux
bogus (Section 4.2) that a secondary mail exchanger had been
established (quoted below). How does this work? Does this mean that
that mail exchanger mail.friend.bogus is configured to hold email when
the machine mail.linux.bogus is down? What if I have only one mail
exchange and my machine is down? Will that mail bounce?

section of zone file from DNS-HOWTO (Section 4.2)
/var/named/pz/linux.bogus

  gw              A       192.168.196.1
                  HINFO   "Cisco" "IOS"
                  TXT     "The router"
 
  ns              A       192.168.196.2
                  MX      10 mail
                  MX      20 mail.friend.bogus.
                  HINFO   "Pentium" "Linux 2.0"
  www             CNAME   ns
 
  donald          A       192.168.196.3
                  MX      10 mail
                  MX      20 mail.friend.bogus.
                  HINFO   "i486"      "Linux 2.0"
                  TXT     "DEK"
 
  mail            A       192.168.196.4
                  MX      10 mail
                  MX      20 mail.friend.bogus.
                  HINFO   "386sx" "Linux 1.2"

brian
====================
Brian Lavender
Sacramento, CA
http://www.brie.com/brian/

"Java?  I've heard of it, 
it is what I drink while hacking Perl!" -- Brent Michalski


------------------------------

From: Mark Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: 
comp.dcom.lans.ethernet,linux.redhat.misc,linux.samba,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: 10/100 Ethernet SWITCH (to be used for Fast Ethernet LAN, and  10-BaseT 
cable modem)
Date: 15 Feb 1999 07:25:57 GMT

> Before you spend for Fast Ethernet, do some tests.  I've never managed to
> successfully record  a CD-R across a Fast Ethernet, even when the data was
> contained entirely within the RAM cache of the server (eliminates disk

egads.  I've recorded, at 4x, cdr's across a _shared_ 10bT net!

> performance as an issue).  The problem appears to be latency--while the data
> rate is high, it's not consistently high for all machines--there are short
> gaps that are long enough to interrupt the stream.

right, so why not have a significant-sized buffer?  cdrecord does,
and lets you set it to pretty much whatever you want.

------------------------------

From: "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: hacked login
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 23:56:02 -0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Someone probably hacked the login program in  my Linux system and it
> > doesn't record te remote host address for a remote telnet login in the
> > "wtmp" file. I recompiled the login program but the problem persists.
> > Any idea what else I should check to solve the problem.
> >                                    Thanks
> >                                     Rafael.
> 
> I had this problem.  The real problem is that once someone like this gets in
> they generally really go after the system.  The install all kinds of versions
> of their own software.  What I did was step by step go through the cert.org
> list of steps for dealing with root compromise.  

Note that one of the limitations often cited of CERT is that it is _not_
a full disclosure service.  CERT issues advisories, but does not always
provide all information required to assess, recover from, or prevent a
given exploit.

You might want to check also with BUGTRAQ and the newly announced HERT
(Hackers Emergency Response Team), both of which specifically address
the full disclosure issue.  

http://geek-girl.com/bugtraq/
http://www.hert.org/
http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/spaf/index.html
http://www.cerias.purdue.edu/
http://www.yahoo.com/Computers_and_Internet/Security_and_Encryption/

-- 
Karsten M. Self ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

    What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
    Welchen Teil von "Gestalt" verstehen Sie nicht?

web:       http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
SAS/Linux: http://www.netcom.com/~kmself/SAS/SAS4Linux.html    

 11:51pm  up 3 days, 11:19,  6 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.25, 0.24

------------------------------

From: Chris Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masquerading and Netmeeting
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:30:13 -0700

Has anyone been successfull in getting Microsoft Netmeeting to work over
IP Masq?  I've follow the instructions found at:

http://dijon.nais.com/~nevo/masq/chat.html#netmeeting

and everything works but receiving audio.  I can send audio, but not
receive.

I'm running Caldera OpenLinux 1.2.  The kernel version is 2.0.33.

In addition to the commands found at the web address above, I've also
tried:

ipautofw -A -r tcp 1024 65535 -h <mywinclient>
ipautofw -A -r udp 1024 65535 -h <mywinclient>

to no avail.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!



------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to