Linux-Networking Digest #216, Volume #10 Mon, 15 Feb 99 18:13:44 EST
Contents:
Problems with incoming calls on ISDN device ("Tom Furie")
Re: It (almost) sounds silly but - (Atif ghaffar)
PPP config problem under 2.2.1 (Keith Davey)
Re: Network help!!! ("Aaron Dershem")
Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux (Luc Luyckx)
searching for guru ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Network card 3com 3C509B Etherlink 3 - problems anyone had this?? (Scott)
Re: HELP! 3c509 dies under RH 5.2 (Mark Bratcher)
PPP networking (Andrew Shaw)
Is there a free proxy software on Linux OS? ("Podrzycki")
BIND.. I'm loosing my MIND!! (Ron Bombard)
Where get KNE40T drivers? (david)
linux->novell print server (Silvio Romagnoli)
Re: plip and forwarding ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Network help!!! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux VPN with Novell Netware (Tom Martinson)
Re: DX _6_ Zone game through Linux IP Masquerade and IPFWADM not working (Nightmare)
Re: slow telnet logins in RH 5.2 (again) vs. Slackware/Caldera (Rick Onanian)
Redhat 5.1 & Loss of automounter (John Murtari)
?:Kernel V2.2.-IP Alias-eth0:0 Is Invisible To 'ifconfig"? (Douglas E. Mitton)
IGMPv2 Leave in 2.0.36 (Dave Putney)
Re: FTP server not working (Xavier Boschian)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Tom Furie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: de.alt.comm.isdn4linux,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Problems with incoming calls on ISDN device
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 12:33:36 -0000
Hi all,
I have an AsusCom ISDNLink I-IN100-ST-DV card on Redhat 5.2 kernel version
2.0.36, using isdn4k-utils-3.0beta2-2. I also have a modem piggybacked
through the POTS port of the ISDN card.
I have configured things so that I am able to make an outbound ISDN call,
that side of things appears to work fine. My problem is with incoming calls
and outgoing analogue calls.
When I connect a modem or telephone to the POTS port on the ISDN card, I get
no dialtone. When I try to make a call from a telephone to the ISDN number,
I get the following errors in my log files:
Feb 2 11:10:54 netsvr01 kernel: isdn_net: Incoming call without OAD,
assuming '0'
Feb 2 11:10:54 netsvr01 kernel: isdn_net: Incoming call without CPN,
assuming '0'
Feb 2 11:10:54 netsvr01 kernel: isdn_tty: Incoming call without OAD,
assuming '0'
Feb 2 11:10:54 netsvr01 kernel: isdn_tty: Incoming call without CPN,
assuming '0'
Feb 2 11:10:54 netsvr01 kernel: isdn_tty: call from 0 -> 0 ignored
I guess here that the ISDN card isn't getting any D-channel information on
the call, but for whatever reason either can't or won't pass it through to
the POTS port.
Can anyone offer advice on what I am doing wrong?
Cheers,
Tom
------------------------------
From: Atif ghaffar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: It (almost) sounds silly but -
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 22:20:19 +0100
try tail -f /var/log/messages &
/etc/ppp/ppp-on-dialer
This will give you hopefully more messages
how did you copy these files to your linux machine? (Ihope not from a fat
or vfat partiion)
run a dos2unix on the files and rechmod them to their proper modes and then
try again
"K.A. Steensma" wrote:
> I have been working on getting a ppp connection into Alltel. Since that
>
> (apparently) use PAP, I have been following the NAG on setting it up.
> The paper says to create 2 scripts and put them in the /etc/ppp/
> directory (which I did). I changed their ownership to root.root and the
>
> permissions to 744. But even though I am logged in as root, when I try
> to execute the 'ppp-on' script file, I get an error message (put in the
> connect-errors file) that ppp-on-dialer; 'No such file or directory'.
> But it is there and ls -l shows it. Even typing
> '/etc/ppp/ppp-on-dialer' says the same thing. But typing 'ls -l
> /etc/ppp/ppp-on-dialer' shows the file.
>
> What is going on? I have enven rebooted and nothing has changed. I
> have even 'cp /etc/ppp/ppp-on-dialer /tmp' and then copied it back
> again. Same thing.
>
> TIA KAS
--
Thank you
Atif Ghaffar
I*Net programmer
artemedia online sa. http://www.artemedia.ch
rue de morges 24 CH 1023 crissier
tel: +41 (0)21 706.20.70 Fax: +41 (0)21 706.20.71
=====================================================================
"If Microsoft is the answer, it must have been a VERY silly question."
------------------------------
From: Keith Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP config problem under 2.2.1
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 11:35:59 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have recently upgraded my kernel to 2.2.1 from 2.0.35 on an evaluation
copy of SuSE 5.3. When I attempt to connect via PPP I exit with this
error in /var/message. Does anyone know a solution to this problem?
Please Email
Feb 15 11:12:10 redlance kernel: registered device ppp0
Feb 15 11:12:10 redlance syslog: IPX support is not present in the
kernel
Feb 15 11:12:11 redlance pppd[251]: pppd 2.2.0 started by root, uid 0
Feb 15 11:12:35 redlance pppd[251]: Serial connection established.
Feb 15 11:12:36 redlance pppd[251]: Using interface ppp0
Feb 15 11:12:36 redlance pppd[251]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
Feb 15 11:12:36 redlance pppd[251]: local IP address 207.218.81.102
Feb 15 11:12:36 redlance pppd[251]: remote IP address 206.165.42.28
Feb 15 11:12:36 redlance pppd[251]: ioctl(SIOCADDRT) device route:
Network
is down
Feb 15 11:12:54 redlance pppd[251]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Feb 15 11:12:54 redlance pppd[251]: Modem hangup
Feb 15 11:12:54 redlance pppd[251]: Connection terminated.
Feb 15 11:12:54 redlance pppd[251]: Exit.
------------------------------
From: "Aaron Dershem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Network help!!!
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 15:22:16 -0600
bklimas wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>And do you have Linux installed or do you have this problem with Windows?
>What distribution and version of Linux did you install? Did the
installation
>program prompt you about your network card during the
>installation? And how do you know you have problems with installation
>of the network card and not just the network setup?
OK, I loaded RH 5.2 and got everything set up except for the networking
part. RH setup couldn't detect the card. It is a D-Link DFE-530TX (not a
card that RH recognizes). So I went poking around on the web and newsgroups
and found a link that took me to the C++ code (the via-rhine.c file).
Here's where my troubles began. What exactly do I do with this?
>Just get RedHat 5.2 and install it. I did so, I am a newbie, and my network
>works. I did not have to recompile anything. I don't know anything about
the
>.c file you mention. It seems to me you make it more complicated then
>it really is.
Again, RH 5.2 didn't help as it couldn't see the card.
I'd like to get this box set up for the network soon, as I plan to install
either Cable Modem access or ADSL soon, and I want this to be my gateway/web
server/mail server/whatever else I can think of.
Thanks!
Aaron.
------------------------------
From: Luc Luyckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 21:36:24 GMT
sure it can. I have recently installed it together with an NTFS partition. The
(re-)partitioning might be the only tricky thing. You can select at the end of the
installation the linux LILO, which gives you the ability to have a dual boot mode.
rgds,
ll
Scott wrote:
> Jon King wrote:
> >
> > Tat M. Leung wrote:
> > >
> > > I have a computer currently running NT server using NTFS. I like to add a
> > > second harddisk to the computer and install RedHat Linux on this drive. The
> > > second harddisk will be used for Linux exclusively. I understand that if NT
> > > is using FAT, there would not be any problem. Since my system is using
> > > NTFS, can I install RedHat Linux on this system?
> > >
> > > Thank you for any advise.
> > >
> > > Tat
> >
> > I have NT(NTFS) on one partition and Linux on another and they work
> > fine. Then again, I'm a newbie to Linux, so take my words with a grain
> > of salt. BTW this Linux OS kicks ass, I've been using Windows all my
> > life and have been waiting for some of the features Linux already has.
> > Now all they need to do is port games to Linux.
> >
> > Jon
>
> Ever heard of "WINE" my friend. The end of your M$ days may come sooner
> than you think (after they implement more API calls).
>
> http://www.winehq.com
>
> --
> The only reason this was posted via a Microsoft box (maybe that will
> change soon?) is that my sister is using the linux box.hine. But, this
> message did travel through my linux firewall.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: searching for guru
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 21:36:42 GMT
hi all....
i'm a newbie to linux and was wondering. i've heard that the best way
to learn linux was with the help of a guru. sounds like sage advise!
is anyone out there willing to put them under their wing and help them
into the Linux fold?
just curious. and thanks a bunch.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Scott)
Subject: Re: Network card 3com 3C509B Etherlink 3 - problems anyone had this??
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 17:51:12 GMT
I'm running RH5.2/2.0.36 i have the exact same nic, and it works
fine.
I dont' know what to tell you about the error now, but if you can't
get it fixed and the system isn't critical, you might want to
reinstall RedHat, and answer yes to configure Networking and have it
autoprobe. I know thats a newby kind of answer, but i'm a newby
whaddya expect :) If you need me to tell you any settings i have in
my 'puter feel free to email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] seeing as
i'm running almost the exact setup as you.
On Fri, 12 Feb 1999 15:29:14 -0600, Al Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I installed redhat 5.2 on pentium 90 box having the 3com 3c509B
>Etherlink 3 network card.
>
>The networking does not work.
>
>if I do -
># ifconfig eth0 up
>
>it says SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource temporarily not available
>
>ifconfig eth0 gives
>IRQ 10 address 0020 af ea 85 b6
>
>Anyone had this problem? How to get around this one?
>
>I have another box which has 3c59x card and it works fine.
>
>al
Thanks,
Richard
P.S. remove the "NOSPAM" to reply via e-mail.
------------------------------
From: Mark Bratcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP! 3c509 dies under RH 5.2
Date: 15 Feb 1999 20:54:40 GMT
Geoff,
You might want to check out what's in kernel 2.2.1 (www.linuxhq.com). I
believe there is some 3c509 items in there. I don't know if it has a
bearing on your specific problem, but worth looking into.
Mark
Geoffrey Mainland wrote:
>
> I installed a fresh copy of RedHat 5.2 (kernel 2.0.36) on a machine
> with a 3c509 ethernet card. Everything works just fine--for a while.
> Then the network interface disappears. /etc/rc.d/init.d/network status
> says the interface is up, but it doesn't work. Rebooting the system
> fixes the problem. The machine has a static IP address, BTW. Any hints
> on how to solve the problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Geoff
------------------------------
From: Andrew Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP networking
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 19:34:29 +0000
Can win95 dialup networking be sent through the com port with out going
through a modem? I am tring to get a win95 machine on to my network vi
a ppp connection through a linux box. Any suggestions?
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Podrzycki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Is there a free proxy software on Linux OS?
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 22:45:42 +0100
I've got three PC's one(server) running Linux RH5.2 with Kernel 2.2.1 and
two running WIN9x.
So I would like to use my internet connection for my three PC's and
therefore I would use my Linux one as a proxy or something like that.
Maybe is there a better solution...?
Any advice/pointer would be very helpful for me...
Thanks.
------------------------------
From: Ron Bombard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: BIND.. I'm loosing my MIND!!
Date: 15 Feb 1999 21:57:15 GMT
Greetings All!
I've been using unix for many years now, but all I've ever used is
/etc/hosts. Now I'm trying to set up BSD on Linux (redhat5.2) and its
driving me nuts! I've been trying for about 2 weeks now and have read
everything I could get my hands on (BOG, Man pages, installation guides,
examples from the net....) and I'm stumped.
This machine is going to be a DNS server and its the only one on our
network. I've attached my "named" related files to the end of this
post.
If anyone can lend a hand, or point me in the right direction, It would
be greatly appreciated.
Here's what happens:
# nslookup gfux02
Server: uranus.nativetextiles.com
Address: 192.168.100.139
*** uranus.nativetextiles.com can't find gfux02: no responce from
server
#
#
It won't find the address for gfux02
But if I do the opposite:
# nslookup 192.168.100.10
Server: uranus.nativetextiles.com
Address: 192.168.100.139
Name: gfux02.nativetextiles.com
Address: 192.168.100.10
#
#
it will find the hostname...
Also, finger gives "connection refused" errors.
Also, sendmail gives "Hostname lookup failure" messages.
Here's my files:
***** FILE: named.boot ******
;
; type domain source file
;
directory /var/named ; running directory for named
primary 0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA db.127.0.0
cache . db.cache
primary nativetextiles.com db.nativetextiles.com
primary 100.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA db.192.168.100
***** FILE: named.conf ******
options {
directory "/var/named";
};
zone "." {
type hint;
file "db.cache";
};
zone "localhost" {
type master;
file "db.127.0.0";
};
zone "100.168.192.in-addr.arpa" {
type master;
file "db.192.168.100";
};
***** FILE: db.127.0.0 ******
@ IN SOA uranus.nativetextiles.com. root.nativetextiles.com (
2
10800
3600
604800
86400 )
IN NS uranus.nativetextiles.com.
1 IN PTR localhost.
***** FILE: db.192.168.100 *******
@ IN SOA uranus.nativetextiles.com.
root.uranus.nativetextiles.com. (
2
10800
3600
604800
86400
)
IN NS uranus.nativetextiles.com.
10 IN PTR gfux02.nativetextiles.com.
130 IN PTR ronulan.nativetextiles.com.
136 IN PTR earth.nativetextiles.com.
138 IN PTR saturn.nativetextiles.com.
***** FILE: db.nativetextiles.com *****
@ IN SOA uranus.nativetextiles.com. root.uranus.nativetextiles.com. (
2
10800
3600
604800
86400
)
IN NS uranus.nativetextiles.com.
localhost IN A 127.0.0.1
uranus IN A 192.168.100.139
gfux02 IN A 192.168.100.10
ronulan IN A 192.168.100.130
earth IN A 192.168.100.136
saturn IN A 192.168.100.138
nativetextiles.com. IN MX 10 uranus.nativetextiles.com.
***** FILE: /etc/hosts ******
127.0.0.1 loop localhost localhost.localdomain
192.168.100.10 gfux02 gfux02. 100BT
192.168.100.130 ronulan
192.168.100.136 earth
192.168.100.138 saturn
192.168.100.139 uranus uranus. uranus.nativetextile.com
***** FILE: /etc/resolv.conf *****
search nativetextiles.com
nameserver 192.168.100.139
***** FILE: /etc/host.conf *****
order hosts, bind
multi on
THANK You.
Ron
--
______________________________________
|Losing a wife can be hard.............|___________________ _-_
|In my case, it was almost impossible..|\__(==========/_=_/
____.---'---`---.____
|--------------------------------------| \_ \
\----._________.----/
|Ron Bombard, Network Administrator...| \ \ / /
`-_-'
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]| __,--`.`-'..'-_
|http://freenet.buffalo.edu/~bh081.....| /____ ||
|______________________________________| `--.____,-'
------------------------------
From: david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Where get KNE40T drivers?
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 16:33:18 -0800
Where do i get kingston tulip and kne40t drivers?
How do I load them as a Module?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Silvio Romagnoli)
Subject: linux->novell print server
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 20:50:00 GMT
Hi everybody.
What do I need to make my linux box print to a Castelle Lanpress
Novell only (old model) print server?
Could I print via their serial ports too?
I've two of them here, and AFAIK they're completely unusable
under W95 and OS/2.
TIA!
PS. RH 5.1 + kernel 2.2.1 here
--
sr - [EMAIL PROTECTED] <strip NOS & PAM to email>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: plip and forwarding
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 21:10:56 GMT
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 11:35:22 +0100, delegado
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip>
>>
>> I don't know about plip but with ppp I use proxy arp to do it
>> just something to think about.
>
>I know. But the question is how can I do proxyarp with plip. With ppp is easy
>because 'proxyarp' is just an option of the daemon but with plip there is not
>daemon and there is not options (I think). I would like do something like
>'proxyarp' but manually. I don't know how but I want to.
>
>enrique.
>
a link turned up in altavista....
http://www.fokus.gmd.de/linux/RedHat/PLIP-Tips-5.html
discribes how to set up proxyarp for an interface targeting PLIP
hope this helps
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Network help!!!
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 21:23:13 GMT
On Sat, 13 Feb 1999 16:56:08 -0600, "Aaron Dershem"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OK, after reading stuff all day and looking all over the web, I'll say it:
>I have no freakin' idea what I'm doing!
>
>Could someone out there outline the steps I need to do in order to get my
>network card to work? I downloaded the via-rhine.c file from the Internet
>(using my Win98 box :-( ), but no clue as to what happens next. Do I have
>to compile a new kernel, compile the driver (.c file), or what?
>
>Thanks, I'll be waiting for an answer.
what kind of ethernet card do you have. you may need to do nothing
but insmod an existing driver then config the ip address.
more infomation please...
>Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Aaron Dershem
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Tom Martinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux VPN with Novell Netware
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 12:34:55 -0600
There is a VPN mini-how to that is pretty good. As for the IPX. Novell
4.11 servers support IP. You might want to switch them over to IP and do
it that way. I think that would be easier to do.
"Magnus L�fqvist" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I want to set up a VPN connection between two Linux boxes.
> It have to do IPX becouse we are running a Novell Netware 4.11 servers
> that
> the ppl on the other side need to connect to. The both side is set up
> with one Linux box as a firewall/gateway to internet, and both a running
> a Novell server.
> How to do this?
>
> Magnus
------------------------------
From: Nightmare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: microsoft.public.games.zone
Subject: Re: DX _6_ Zone game through Linux IP Masquerade and IPFWADM not working
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 1999 02:28:15 GMT
In article <JfIv2.38$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Wadels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, after no answer and more searching, I found a solution that so far has
> worked 98%. These commands in Linux do it. I recommend putting them in a
> shell script which you'd run only before getting on the zone. This bypasses
> some of your firewall's security, but it lets you play your 15-30 min game.
> My home network can take a bit less security for this kind of window. After
> you're done, run ipautofw -F to flush these rules, which (as far as I know)
> should restore full security.
>
> ipautofw -A -r udp 1000 5000 -h [address of your Outwars machine]
> ipautofw -A -r tcp 1000 5000 -h [address of your Outwars machine]
> ipautofw -A -r udp 47624 47624 -h [address of your Outwars machine]
> ipautofw -A -r tcp 47624 47624 -h [address of your Outwars machine]
>
> The 2% that doesn't work for me is this: my latency value (from a ping) does
> not show up in the zone, so people think my connection must be terribly slow
> (so they don't want to be in my game), and only 1 machine on my internal
> network can play at a time. I can certainly live with this. I think that one
> Mike Miller was the one who posted this solution. Thanks, Mike.
>
> Note, I've only played 2 or 3 people in Outwars on the Zone with these
> settings. I don't know if they all had DirectX 6 or if (and when) it
> matters. Good luck all.
Where can we get IPAUTOFW?
Thanks,
Bill
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: slow telnet logins in RH 5.2 (again) vs. Slackware/Caldera
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 13:30:44 -0500
Doesn't your list answer your own question? I'm not sure of how all this
works, but if the problem is that the system is doing a reverse DNS, and
if slackware doesn't do the reverse dns, wouldn't that explain why
slackware doesn't have that problem?
rick
Tim Lines wrote:
>
> You're explanation is correct but it doesn't explain why the slackware machine
> was not slow. I believe that some machines do the reverse address resolution
> when telnetted to and some do not. An incomplete list (if I can believe
> everything I have heard):
>
> Systems that do reverse lookup:
> AIX
> Redhat
> Caldera
> VMS running UCX
>
> Systems that don't do a reverse lookup:
> SunOS 4.1.X
> Slackware
>
> ACE Alex wrote:
>
> > Had the same prob when i installed redhat. But I found a solution! The
> > telnet login is slow cause when you are trying to connect to the machine it
> > runs reverse dns on the ip address to get some info on you! And cause it
> > cant find the dns server it has to wait for a network time out. So put up a
> > dns server or disable the reverse dns search!
> >
------------------------------
From: John Murtari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Redhat 5.1 & Loss of automounter
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 13:29:09 -0500
Folks,
We are running Redhat 5.1 on Pentium II's, and using the
autofs RPM package for NFS automount capabilities. We are in
a mixed environment of Linux and Solaris systems.
We are noticing that after about 7 days time our Linx
server refuses to automount filesystems off the other Solaris
servers. The ones that are mounted (with long timeouts) are fine
and still available -- you just can't mount a new one.
If we reboot the machine, everything is fine again.
Any suggestions would be welcome.
John Murtari
http://www.thebook.com/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Douglas E. Mitton)
Subject: ?:Kernel V2.2.-IP Alias-eth0:0 Is Invisible To 'ifconfig"?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 22:29:40 GMT
I have Kernel V2.2.1 up and running just fine. PPP, Masq and all are
working ... its just that I have a strange side effect.
My Linux machine MASQ's for my kids Win3.11 machine via a PPP dialup
connection. In order to make it flexible I IP alias the GATEWAY IP on
the same machine as my Linux IP address ... don't know why, I just
wanted to treat the GATEWAY x.x.x.1 address special.
When I ifconfig to view the ethernet devices only the primary eth0
(and of course lo and ppp0) show up, not the eth0:0 alias device. The
alias device works, it can be "pinged" and the MASQ setup works fine
(the Win3.11 machine points to the x.x.x.1 GATEWAY interface).
The V2.0.36 load I was running previously worked just fine as well and
was visible in a normal fashion (with ifconfig). Has anyone an
explaination or a fix for this situation. Its more of a nuisance than
anything else. I've been all through the /proc file system looking
for a reference BUT I can't find eth0:0 either.
I think all my utilities are upgraded enough. I am a minor release
behind on a couple of things and some packages I don't have installed
at all ... this is per the V2.2.1 CHANGES file.
Thanks in advance for any pointers and/or help!
================================================
Doug Mitton - Brockville, Ontario, Canada
'City of the Thousand Islands'
Amateur Radio: VE3DMZ ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cybertap.com/dmitton
User Group: http://signals.rmc.ca/klug
SPAM Reduction: Remove "x." from my domain.
================================================
------------------------------
From: dputney@I_should_put_my_domain_in_etc_NNTP_INEWS_DOMAIN (Dave Putney)
Subject: IGMPv2 Leave in 2.0.36
Date: 15 Feb 99 18:37:28 GMT
I upgraded one of my computers from 2.0.32 to 2.0.36 recently. After
doing that, I noticed that multicast flows did not end when I left the
group, despite being the only receiver on that group. I discovered that
the IGMP leave message software was changed by 2.0.34, so I checked what
the packet was sending. It turns out that the group address that it sends
is the all-routers group. While this is find for the IP destination
address, the routers still must know which group the host is trying to
leave.
I looked at the code (igmp.c?) to no avail, as I don't have nearly enough
C experience to make heads or tails out of it. Could someone suggest a
workaround, or a fix, which will enable me to get this working properly?
Thanks!
-Dave
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Xavier Boschian)
Subject: Re: FTP server not working
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 07:14:46 GMT
Did you check the config files in /etc :
ftpusers
ftpaccess
ftphosts
ftpgroup
Normally, you should have also a /home/ftp directory !
Wu-ftp is a secure product, check the FAQ.
I hope that could help you.
Xavier
> > ftp xxxxxxx.xxxx.com.au
> Connected to xxxxxxx.xxxx.com.au.
> 220 xxxxxxx.xxxx.com.au FTP server (Version wu-2.4.2-academ[BETA-15](1)
>Mon Sep 22 20:49:48 EDT 1997) ready.
> Name (xxxxxxx.xxxx.com.au:yyyyyy): www
> 331 Password required for www.
> Password:
> 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection
> Login failed.
> No control connection for command: Illegal seek
> ftp> bye
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
