Linux-Networking Digest #238, Volume #10 Thu, 18 Feb 99 03:13:44 EST
Contents:
lots of domain traffic ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Mojo Ain't Workin NFS Boot - PAM error (Mojo Geek)
Netware 4.11/5 and Linux? (ryan)
Re: HELP - Samba, TCP/IP ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux programming jobs? (Marco Anglesio)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? ("jim")
Re: RTL 8139 Network card problem ("Mark Swindell")
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (steveT)
Linux POP/IMAP w/ LDAP service? ("Colin Stefani")
110 Base network Cards ("Chris O'Donoghue")
Re: PPP under linux 2.2.1 ("Wei-chun Chao")
Re: HELP - Samba, TCP/IP (Dave Putney)
Re: PPP under linux 2.2.1 (Matt Jackson)
PPP under linux 2.2.1 (Matt Jackson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lots of domain traffic
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 18:46:23 GMT
I am seeing constant traffic between my Linux box and the gateway
to which it's attached:
02:43:53.915775 myhost.1680 > proxyserver.domain: 16547+ (43)
02:43:53.935775 proxyserver.domain > myhost.1680: 16547 1/2/2 (166)
... lots of these lines ...
Any reason why I would be getting all this domain traffic when nothing
is really going on on the system? I use this box for a firewall/IP
masquerade, SMTP/POP3, & Apache, but when I do the tcpdump none are
being accessed.
Thanks.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Mojo Geek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mojo Ain't Workin NFS Boot - PAM error
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 10:40:12 +0000
I've rtfm'd till I'm blue in the face.
I'm trying to add a diskless workstation to my home network. It boots
fine. It does the DHCP and BOOTP stuff fine. It even mounts the root
dir via nfs FINE. Then I can't log in. It gives me a PAM warning and
sez it don't know who I am. I tried changin the etc/pam.d/login file of
the remote root dir, no help. I accidently changed my own
/etc/pam.d/login and screwed myownself having to boot "emergency rw" to
fix it. I've scanned this group for similar PAM issues and only came
upon Outlook probs.
I know the answer is simple, I just don't know it. I know the answer is
bound to be documented, I just don't know where to look. If anyone can
help me my kids would love it and deserve it. Also, it would make me
look and feel good to get their game machine happenin.
TIA and Cheers
--
Bryan E. Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Houston, Texas Tel/Fax 281-575-0949
http://www.wantabe.com/bpatrick
------------------------------
From: ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Netware 4.11/5 and Linux?
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 05:29:47 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello --
I'm wondering if anyone out in Netwareland has used a Linux mail server on a
Netware 4.11 or 5.0 network. Anyone interested in talking about that can email
me. Thanks..
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
open source internet solutions
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HELP - Samba, TCP/IP
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 19:12:16 GMT
In article <7a2c4a$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Michel A. Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello all. i have successfully installed a network card onto my LINUX Red
> Hat 5.2 server (kernel 2.0.36-0.7). during startup, this LINUX server is
> assigned an IP address from my NT3.51 server with DHCP. i can telnet, ftp
> and
> ping from a win 9x workstation into the linux box. furthermore, i can ping
> from the linux box to the NT server and any NT4/9x station. i can also use
> samba to access the shared directories on the NT server.
>
> however, i cannot use smbclient from the linux server to any of the NT4/9x
> workstations. in addition, i cannot telnet to either the NT server or to
> any of the workstations. the linux server also does not appear in the
> network neighborhood of any NT4/9x workstation.
>
> i feel like i'm close, but i am not network savvy. i'm not sure where to go
> next. any suggestions would be very welcome. more details are added below.
>
> other (related?) question:
> since my NT server assigns IP address dynamically, i would like to be able
> to ping, telnet or ftp to the workstations using their respective host
> names. how can i set this up? does this involve name resolution and/or the
> lmhosts file?
>
> thank you for your attention in this inquiry.
>
> regards,
> michel a. lim
> associate
> wong hobach lau
> consulting engineers
> structural/civil/construction management
> www.whl-international.com
>
> more background info...
> NT 3.51 Server
> static IP 192.168.34.1
> host name: WHL_NT1
> domain name: WHL_DC
> workgroup: wong
> DHCP installed
> DNS and WINS not configured
>
> Linux Red Hat 5.2 server (kernel 2.0.36-0.7, samba 1.9.18)
> host name WHL31
>
> typical NT4/9x workstation
> Intel EtherExpress PRO/10+ ISA network card
> TCP/IP protocol installed
> NetBEUI protocol installed as default protocol
>
> telnet 192.168.34.1
> Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
>
> ifconfig
> Link encap: Ethernet HWaddr: 00:A0:C9:16:83:F7
> inet addr:192.168.34.8 Bcast:192.168.34.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST NOTRAILERS RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> Rx packets:1671 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> Tx packets:892 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:1 collisions:2
> Interrupt:7 Base address:0x320
>
> this works -
> smbclient \\\\WHL_NT1\\WHL_CDRV -U mlim
> Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host WHL31
> Failed to get my hostname
> Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host WHL31
> No interface found for address 144.20.14.64
> Added interface ip=144.20.14.64 bcast=144.20.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0
> Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host WHL31
> Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host WHL31
> startlmhosts: Can't open lmhosts file /etc/lmhosts. Error was No such
> file or directory
> Server time is...
> Timezone is UTC-8.0
> password:
>
> this does NOT work -
> smbclient \\\\WHL27\\temp -U mlim
> Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host WHL31
> Failed to get my hostname
> Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host WHL31
> No interface found for address 144.20.14.64
> Added interface ip=144.20.14.64 bcast=144.20.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0
> Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host WHL31
> Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host WHL31
> startlmhosts: Can't open lmhosts file /etc/lmhosts. Error was No such
> file or directory
> Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host WHL31
> cli_open_sockets: Unknown host WHL27
>
> excerpts from smb.conf
> [global]
> # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name
> workgroup=wong
>
> #All NetBIOS names must be resolved to IP addresses
> ; name resolve order=wins lmhost bcast
>
> #DNS Proxy
> dns proxy=no
>
> [homes]
> comment=Home Directories
> browseable=no
> writeable=yes
>
> ;[netlogon]
> ; comment=Network Logon System
> ; path=/home/netlogon
> ; guest ok=yes
> ; writeable=no
> ; share modes=no
>
>
I actually, for the first time, was able to get my W95 to see Linux in NN last
night. The change I made? See where it says
Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host WHL31
I was getting the same message when I ran TESTPARM. My Linux box's network
name was 'linux'. But the message I was getting was
Get_Hostbyname: Unknown host HOME
So I went into linuxconf, found where it called the box 'HOME', and changed it
to 'linux'. Voila! It worked. What clued me in was at the command line
prompt. It was 'root@home'. After the change, it became 'root@linux'. After
I restarted, I could see 'linux' in W95. Now I have a password problem, but
that's for another night. Hopefully, this helps...
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco Anglesio)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Re: Linux programming jobs?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 20:04:42 GMT
I'd also mention that you're in the capital of a province just coming out
of recession, with a government about to hand down a budget in the red and
no other industries, really, around.
The reason that you're having trouble finding a job in Victoria is because
there probably aren't many, and the ones that you are fighting for, you
are fighting for against an oversupply of UVic graduates.
I would try to take a job as a tech and work your way up. One does not
become a programmer in a day. Open source experience (putting together
projects, learning internals) will help. So will, sad to say, getting at
least a couple of years in university. Even if it has nothing to do with
programming at all, the existence of some university makes a difference.
marco
--
,--------------------------------------------------------------------------.
> | We've been doing anal probing <
> Marco Anglesio | for years now, and all we've <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] | discovered is that one in ten <
> http://www.the-wire.com/~mpa | doesn't seem to mind. <
> | --Dave Foley, of Kids in the Hall <
`--------------------------------------------------------------------------'
------------------------------
From: "jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.solaris
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 21:00:15 -0800
kcypher+AEA-usa.net wrote in message
+ADw-7af51q+ACQ-h5v+ACQ-1+AEA-nnrp1.dejanews.com+AD4-...
+AD4-In article +ADw-7aer7v+ACQ-rc3+ACQ-1+AEA-alexander.INS.CWRU.Edu+AD4-,
+AD4- cjc5+AEA-po.cwru.edu (Craig J Copi) wrote:
+AD4APg- In article +ADw-MPG.1134a7bc303f3e4f989726+AEA-news.ind.net+AD4-,
+AD4APg- tom+AEA-birch.palni.eduNOSPAM (Tom Metzger) writes:
+AD4APg- +AD4- We started with tree names (hickory, ash, oak, chestnut) and have since
+AD4APg- +AD4- moved on to Star Trek names on one of our domains (spock, data,
crusher,
+AD4APg- +AD4- worf, etc) and Disney names for our NT (ugh) machines (Bugs, Daffy,
Warner).
+AD4APg- +AF4AXgBeAF4-
++AF4AXgBeAF4AXg-
+AD4APg- Well, at least these two are appropriate.
+AD4APg-
+AD4APg- +AD4- Warner).
+AD4-
+AD4-Yeah, but since when do Bugs +ACY- Daffy work for Disney?
+AD4-
+AD4-Kurt
+AD4-
They started when the Warner Brothers did.
------------------------------
From: "Mark Swindell" <mark.swindell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RTL 8139 Network card problem
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 20:23:41 -0000
Reply-To: "Mark Swindell" <mark.swindell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
===== Original Message =====
From: Mathew Ryden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.networking
Sent: 15 February 1999 04:50
Subject: Re: RTL 8139 Network card problem
>
>Mark Swindell <mark.swindell@[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:7a7j44$4es$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>I'm stuck trying to get my laptop (reliably) talking to my network. I've
>>just about run out of things to try so any help is appreciated.
<< snip >>
>What kernel and net-tools versions are you using?
>
>A possible solution for you is this. Instead of what you are doing, do a
>insmod rtl8139
>/etc/rc.d/init.d/network restart
>
>if it still doesn't work, and you aren't using version 2.2.x of the kernel
>or something, I sadly don't know what to say.
>
>
>Mathew Ryden
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the help. Unfortunately no luck yet. Im stuck at 10mbps (hub
restriction) so Ive no idea if 100mbps will be any better.
Using insmod instead of modprobe showed no difference.
pinging the card ip results in a Network unreachable error.
Im using kernel 2.0.34. I guess its time to try a kernel upgrade!
Thanks,
Mark
------------------------------
From: steveT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
vmsnet.networks.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 17:01:56 +0000
I'm glad people are getting wise to MS. I'm glad Linus makes Bill Nervous
too! The Scandanavians are shit hot at this stuff... It's those long winters
I reakon.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> I'm giggling. I spent the afternoon at a company that is having
> stability problems with their DEC Alpha based NT boxes. I asked them
> what the uptime was like and they kinda shrugged and said about six to
> seven hours at a time. No kidding. I suggested scrapping them and
> putting in Solaris based Sun boxes and they looked at each other and
> then said - "We can't administer unix".
>
> I said "What could be worse, a set of servers that crash three times a
> day - OR - a server that you look at once every week and then
> call in someone to do administration for you - remotely. Meanwhile your
> users and management are happy cause your email system hasn't stopped
> working. You have uptime measured in months?"
>
> You can guess the answer. People are learning - slowly - but they are
> learning.
>
> Dennis
>
> Michael Paci wrote:
>
> > In article <ejYGuOoW#[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Shaun
> > Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >There's quite a few mythological characters, so you
> > >probably won't run out too fast.
> >
> > Here's another mythical character: missioncriticalNTbox
> >
> > I'm laughing if nobody else is...
> >
> > mike paci
>
> --
> Your computer needs a hobby! Join the distributed RC5-64 decryption!
> Go to http://www.distributed.net/ for the fastest computer on earth!
--
=================================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://website.lineone.net/~steve-taylor/CV.html
=================================================
------------------------------
From: "Colin Stefani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux POP/IMAP w/ LDAP service?
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 22:34:34 -0800
Anyone have any experience getting a POP/IMAP mail server up and running
with LDAP as a central address for a corporate lan? I just want the LDAP
server to provide a centralized point for the main address book, so I don't
have to distribute a new one everytime someone new gets hired or leaves. If
you have any good on-line references or can reply with some sort of pointer
to good info on the bestway to do this and a SW package that seems to work
well together.
I'm using RH 5.2.
thanks,
-colin.stefani
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Chris O'Donoghue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 110 Base network Cards
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 09:39:26 +1300
Hi can anyone give me some advice on 100 base network cards.
I was using epic100 based cards (SMC) when I had a 10-T network
but now that I have a 100-TX they occasionally hang and lose contact with
the kernel.
Does anyone have strong views on what network card is best.
Chris
------------------------------
From: "Wei-chun Chao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP under linux 2.2.1
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 22:59:58 -0800
You are right.
Xisp used simple PAP option of pppd 2.2.x and it's not supported by pppd
2.3.x anymore.
That's why I have to use PAP-secret now...
Thanx a lot!
Clifford Kite ���g��峹 <7afuhu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>This is *your* problem. The ISP want you to authenticate using PAP but
>you are not configured to do so. The ISP won't take no for an answer
>so the connection fails.
>
>Configure for PAP, a /etc/ppp/pap-secrets file with the line
>
>YourISPName * YourISPPassword
>
>and adding the pppd option "user YourISPName" should do it. Checkout
>"man pppd" for more about this.
------------------------------
From: dputney@I_should_put_my_domain_in_etc_NNTP_INEWS_DOMAIN (Dave Putney)
Subject: Re: HELP - Samba, TCP/IP
Date: 17 Feb 99 20:42:30 GMT
After setting up Samba on a RH5.0 box, I've never had a problem with
seeing my linux box in the network neighborhood of a 95 box. I believe I
also had no problems with NT, but it's been a long time since I did that!
-Dave
Matt
Lampiasi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: : "Michel A. Lim" wrote:
: > any of the workstations. the linux server also does not appear in the
: > network neighborhood of any NT4/9x workstation.
: I dont know about your samba problems but if a computer is only using tcp/ip on
: a windows95/NT network it will not show up in network neighborhood. If you use
: ipx or netbeui they should be showing up in the network neighborhood. (have
: never used ipx on linux though). Also the first statement is just from my
: experience, i have never read that it is true anywhere.
------------------------------
From: Matt Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP under linux 2.2.1
Date: 18 Feb 1999 18:39:28 +1100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite) writes:
> : /etc/ppp/peers.tig2
> : ttyS1
> : 57600
> : crtscts
> : xonxoff
>
> The crtscts and xonxoff are conflicting options, most modems can use
> crtscts with most ISPs without a problem. I'd drop the xonxoff. The
> LCP negotiations you posted suggest that the ISP doesn't get or doesn't
> understand what pppd sends and this could be the cause of such a
> problem.
Just me playing around. Actually, the crtscts was commented out but I
removed the # from my post without removing the crtscts. Either way it
doesn't work.
The weird thing is that 2.0.36 works with exactly the same configuration
- I boot into 2.2.1 not working, back to 2.0.36 without any changes
works fine.
Thanks anyway,
--
Matt Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Matt Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP under linux 2.2.1
Date: 18 Feb 1999 07:33:20 +1100
Having watched this newsgroup for awhile it seems that others might be
having this problem as well but I haven't seen anything that has helped
me.
The problem - after upgrading to Linux kernel 2.2.1 and pppd 2.3.5 my
PPP doesn't work. The chat script dials happily, connects and then dies
with 'LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests'. If I boot a 2.0.36 kernel
with the exact same pppd, libc (2.0.111) and config files it works fine
as it has for many months.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Attached are various files
/etc/ppp/peers.tig2
ttyS1
57600
crtscts
xonxoff
noauth
defaultroute
lock
asyncmap 0xa0000
noipdefault
ipcp-accept-local
ipcp-accept-remote
connect '/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/ppp/chat-tig2'
ipparam tig
mru 1524
novj
[NB: mru and novj lines added to try and resolve problem to no avail]
/etc/ppp/chat-tig2
ABORT BUSY
ABORT 'NO CARRIER'
'' ATZ
OK ATM0
OK ATDTnnnnnnnn
CONNECT ''
ogin: mjj
assword: nottelling
Log file produced
Feb 17 19:06:51 emjay pppd[368]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Feb 17 19:06:51 emjay pppd[368]: Connecting with </usr/sbin/chat -v -f
/etc/ppp/chat-tig2>
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: abort on (BUSY)
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: send (ATZ^M)
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: expect (OK)
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: ATZ^M^M
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: OK
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: -- got it
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: send (ATM0^M)
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: expect (OK)
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: ^M
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: ATM0^M^M
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: OK
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: -- got it
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: send (ATDTnnnnnnnn^M)
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: expect (CONNECT)
Feb 17 19:06:53 emjay chat[369]: ^M
Feb 17 19:07:22 emjay chat[369]: ATDTnnnnnnnn^M^M
Feb 17 19:07:22 emjay chat[369]: CONNECT
Feb 17 19:07:22 emjay chat[369]: -- got it
Feb 17 19:07:22 emjay chat[369]: send (^M)
Feb 17 19:07:22 emjay chat[369]: expect (ogin:)
Feb 17 19:07:22 emjay chat[369]: 52000^M
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay chat[369]: Welcome to The Internet Group AusMax17^M
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay chat[369]: ^M
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay chat[369]: ^M
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay chat[369]: login:
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay chat[369]: -- got it
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay chat[369]: send (mjj^M)
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay pppd[368]: Serial connection established.
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay chat[369]: expect (assword:)
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay chat[369]: mjj^M
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay chat[369]: Password:
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay chat[369]: -- got it
Feb 17 19:07:24 emjay chat[369]: send (nottelling^M)
Feb 17 19:07:25 emjay pppd[368]: Using interface ppp0
Feb 17 19:07:25 emjay pppd[368]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
Feb 17 19:07:25 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x8781d30d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 17 19:07:25 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 1, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:25 emjay pppd[368]: Timeout 804ca04:806af00 in 3 seconds.
Feb 17 19:07:25 emjay pppd[368]: LCP: sending Configure-Request, id 1
Feb 17 19:07:28 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x8781d30d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 17 19:07:28 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 1, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:28 emjay pppd[368]: Timeout 804ca04:806af00 in 3 seconds.
Feb 17 19:07:28 emjay pppd[368]: LCP: sending Configure-Request, id 1
Feb 17 19:07:31 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x8781d30d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 17 19:07:31 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 1, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:31 emjay pppd[368]: Timeout 804ca04:806af00 in 3 seconds.
Feb 17 19:07:31 emjay pppd[368]: LCP: sending Configure-Request, id 1
Feb 17 19:07:33 emjay pppd[368]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 7e 0a 8a>]
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_rconfreq(LCP): Rcvd id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd MRU
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: (1524)
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd ASYNCMAP
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: (a0000)
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd PCOMPRESSION
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd ACCOMPRESSION
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd unknown option 17
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: (REJ)
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd unknown option 19
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: (REJ)
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: returning CONFREJ.
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00
c0 7b 7e 0a 8a>]
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 4, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x8781d30d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 1, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: Timeout 804ca04:806af00 in 3 seconds.
Feb 17 19:07:34 emjay pppd[368]: LCP: sending Configure-Request, id 1
Feb 17 19:07:37 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x8781d30d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 17 19:07:37 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 1, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:37 emjay pppd[368]: Timeout 804ca04:806af00 in 3 seconds.
Feb 17 19:07:37 emjay pppd[368]: LCP: sending Configure-Request, id 1
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 7e 0a 8a>]
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_rconfreq(LCP): Rcvd id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd MRU
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: (1524)
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd ASYNCMAP
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: (a0000)
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd PCOMPRESSION
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd ACCOMPRESSION
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd unknown option 17
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: (REJ)
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd unknown option 19
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: (REJ)
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: returning CONFREJ.
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00
c0 7b 7e 0a 8a>]
Feb 17 19:07:38 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 4, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:40 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x8781d30d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 17 19:07:40 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 1, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:40 emjay pppd[368]: Timeout 804ca04:806af00 in 3 seconds.
Feb 17 19:07:40 emjay pppd[368]: LCP: sending Configure-Request, id 1
Feb 17 19:07:43 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x8781d30d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 17 19:07:43 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 1, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:43 emjay pppd[368]: Timeout 804ca04:806af00 in 3 seconds.
Feb 17 19:07:43 emjay pppd[368]: LCP: sending Configure-Request, id 1
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 7e 0a 8a>]
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_rconfreq(LCP): Rcvd id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd MRU
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: (1524)
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd ASYNCMAP
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: (a0000)
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd PCOMPRESSION
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd ACCOMPRESSION
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd unknown option 17
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: (REJ)
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd unknown option 19
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: (REJ)
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: returning CONFREJ.
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00
c0 7b 7e 0a 8a>]
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 4, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x8781d30d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 1, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: Timeout 804ca04:806af00 in 3 seconds.
Feb 17 19:07:46 emjay pppd[368]: LCP: sending Configure-Request, id 1
Feb 17 19:07:49 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x8781d30d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 17 19:07:49 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 1, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:49 emjay pppd[368]: Timeout 804ca04:806af00 in 3 seconds.
Feb 17 19:07:49 emjay pppd[368]: LCP: sending Configure-Request, id 1
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 7e 0a 8a>]
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_rconfreq(LCP): Rcvd id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd MRU
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: (1524)
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd ASYNCMAP
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: (a0000)
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd PCOMPRESSION
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd ACCOMPRESSION
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: (ACK)
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd unknown option 17
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: (REJ)
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: rcvd unknown option 19
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: (REJ)
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: lcp_reqci: returning CONFREJ.
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00
c0 7b 7e 0a 8a>]
Feb 17 19:07:50 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 4, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:52 emjay pppd[368]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1524> <asyncmap
0xa0000> <magic 0x8781d30d> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 17 19:07:52 emjay pppd[368]: fsm_sdata(LCP): Sent code 1, id 1.
Feb 17 19:07:52 emjay pppd[368]: Timeout 804ca04:806af00 in 3 seconds.
Feb 17 19:07:52 emjay pppd[368]: LCP: sending Configure-Request, id 1
Feb 17 19:07:55 emjay pppd[368]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Feb 17 19:07:55 emjay pppd[368]: Connection terminated.
Feb 17 19:07:56 emjay pppd[368]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Feb 17 19:07:56 emjay pppd[368]: Exit.
--
Matt Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
