Linux-Networking Digest #285, Volume #10 Mon, 22 Feb 99 21:13:40 EST
Contents:
Recognizing Network Adapter (Uli Linn)
Re: Linux programming jobs? (Rich)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
How do I disable ident-requests for telnetd? (Kai Krebber)
SuSE 5.2 > 6.0, PPP ok for root, not user. Permissions? (mh)
load capability on Linux ("Ahmed Aden")
Re: Slackware 3.5 and Windows ISP (Bob Capistrant)
Re: Two computer use one modem to connect internet... (bklimas)
Re: Telepath 33.6 modem PPP Dialup ("Jeff")
Re: PCI modems in linux? ("Jeff Kowalczyk")
Win95 and Linux Mail Server (Kamil Politowicz)
Samba strangeness (no spamfree-market.net (Max Freedom))
Re: where to find qt 1.42
Re: Telnet mysteriously non-functional, refuses connections ("David Cook")
Re: Samba problems ("Coleman Ammerman")
Redhat 5.2 & Linksys EtherPCI LanCard II Problems PLEASE HELP!! (Daniel Koerner)
Re: Firewall with 1 IP (jedi)
Re: Problem: ifconfig, route, and Kernel 2.2.1 ("Kelly")
Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Uli Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Recognizing Network Adapter
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 16:24:53 +0100
Hi - I'm not shure, if i'm on topic in her, but I hope so...
I bought a userd 486 PC to run linux on it. Installing the os i have to
specify the components. Now the problem: I've got no idea, what kind of
network adapter ist in my computer. Ther is no Name printed on ist.
It's a ISA-Card with 1 BNC Plug on it. The only Name i can find, is
"UMC" on the main Chip.
Can anyone help? Or is there any software, that will do the recoqnition
for me?
Thank's a lot for your help!
Uli Linn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rich)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Re: Linux programming jobs?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 19:13:17 GMT
On 21 Feb 1999 10:34:17 -0800, David T. Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Some people call it a high cost of living. Other call it a
>high standard of living.
>
>The difference in pay for a programmer, and the extremely high
>demand, in the Bay Area far outweigh the increased cost of
>living. $1200/mo for rent is a pretty nice 1 BR apartment
>in the city. That is $14,400 per year, or a pay increase of
>$7.70/hour for a 2000 hour work year.
>
Thank you for proving my point. :-) Your "pretty nice 1BR
apartment in the city" is just about twice my mortgage for
a 1500sqft. 3BR house in an extremely nice neighborhood,
with a 1/2 acre lot, minutes away from everything from world-class
theatre to more high-tech jobs than you can shake a stick at.
As for your calculations - you forgot the high cost of eating,
owning an automobile, not to mention the disadvantages of living in
the Peoples Republic of Kalifornia. ( Although, admittedly, they
have come down from the clouds a bit in the past few years. )
- Rich
--
Rich Mulvey
http://mulvey.dyndns.com
Amateur Radio: aa2ys@wb2wxq.#wny.ny.usa
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
vmsnet.networks.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: 22 Feb 1999 23:02:42 GMT
In comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix bill robison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> FERD wrote:
>>
>> How come nobody uses saints?
>> :)
>
> Because they have to be dead. Bad karma.
Because that might be taken badly by some people?
(Or: Because some believe the saints *aren't* dead, and might be offended
at having computers named after them -- especially if statements like
"Dammit! Mary just went down on me AGAIN!" are made.)
--
Kevin P. Neal http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/
"You know, I think I can hear the machine screaming from here... \
'help me! hellpp meeee!'" - Heather Flanagan, 14:52:23 Wed Jun 10 1998
------------------------------
From: Kai Krebber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How do I disable ident-requests for telnetd?
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 11:15:00 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howdy!
Our Intranetserver is running on SUSE-Linux 6.0
When trying to send mail to sendmail or telnetting to this host, there's
a 5 second-delay before accepting the email or getting the telnet-login
prompt.
With tcpdump, I saw that the linuxbox is emmitting an ident-request
(getting no response, 'cause there are no ident deamons running on the
win workstations).
I found the Timeout-Switch in the sendmail.cf to disable ident-lookups
there, but where is this switch in telnetd (if any)?
ad<thanx>vance,
Kai
------------------------------
From: mh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SuSE 5.2 > 6.0, PPP ok for root, not user. Permissions?
Date: 22 Feb 1999 16:23:01 PST
My SuSE 5.2 configuration would let me use PPP as a user, after I
changed some PPP permissions. After upgrading to 6.0, which uses ppp
2.3.5, I get the following message: "/usr/sbin/pppd: using the name
option requires root privilage". I noticed that
/usr/suseppp/generic.chat and generic.options were root.dialout so I
added me to the dialout group. Same message. I tried adding me to
/etc/ppp/peers, with "noauth me" in the /etc/ppp/peers/me file. Same
message.
Root dials out fine. I just don't want to become root to dialout. kppp
works fine for me, but . . .
Thanks!
--
"The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy,
but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness."
------------------------------
From: "Ahmed Aden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: load capability on Linux
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 19:26:16 -0500
I have a PII 333mhz, 64mb RAM, 2.1 IDE hd, a 10/100 fast ethernet card &
hub, and I was planning to run some services on the net. Aside from hard
disk space, what limitations would you think there would be as far as loads
and hits coming to my site. Would the limiting factor be bandwith, since I
only have a 56k modem. If I were to get something like ADSL or a cable
modem, what constraints would there be on the hardware?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Capistrant)
Subject: Re: Slackware 3.5 and Windows ISP
Date: 22 Feb 1999 16:01:05 -0600
L J Bayuk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
<snip>
: Also, I read something today in a ppp README file about some NT
: Server's RAS needing the work "CLIENT" sent to them before they will
: start talking LCP.
I had similar problems connecting to an NT server. Turned out it was
running the MSCHAP authentication protocol. My version of Slackware
has MSCHAP support, so does yours(3.5). As noted above, the last line
in your chat script should be:
CONNECT "CLIENT"
Also, you may find that your ppp invocation may need the "name" option
which I had to run as root. My, slightly edited script follows:
#!/bin/bash
# Script to dial my dialup account
#
# Set domain name and name server
cat /home/me/dialup.conf > /etc/resolv.conf
#
/usr/sbin/pppd name INTERNET.account.username remotename remote_machine_name debug \
connect "/usr/sbin/chat -f /home/me/my_chat_script" &
The INTERNET.account.username indicates the type of service I have,
the group account name, and my user account. The remote_machine_name doesn't
seem to matter, or I'm a very lucky guesser ;-).
--
Bob Capistrant
bobcap @ accessus. net <remove blanks when replying>
"There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
We don't believe this to be a coincidence." -- Jeremy S. Anderson
------------------------------
From: bklimas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Two computer use one modem to connect internet...
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 00:29:51 GMT
Kris Dong wrote:
> Hello,everyone:
> I have two computers.One is Windows NT workstation 4.0 and the other is
> Linux slackware.
> How can I use only one modem and one phone to connect Internet?
>
> Thank you!!
Ip masquerading should do. See my webpage:
http://www.magma.ca/~bklimas/#masquerading
for the simplest way.
Hope this helps. Best regards,
b.k.
------------------------------
From: "Jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telepath 33.6 modem PPP Dialup
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 19:29:55 -0500
I apologize that url is wrong the correct one is
http://www.mri.co.uk/modem1.html
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Kowalczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PCI modems in linux?
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 11:45:02 -0500
I checked Aopen's modems out at their website, hoping that they have PCI 56K
modems that act like generic modems. However, the two current models are
'controllerless'. I may be mistaken, but doesn't that imply a winmodem,
requiring CPU resources and a driver to actually accomplish anything?
Bob Stickel wrote in message <7amh1l$g0n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have purchased Aopen PCI 56k modems that are either PNP or manual jumper
>settings but are not Winmodems...they're inexpensive and they work fine..
------------------------------
From: Kamil Politowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Win95 and Linux Mail Server
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 16:46:50 +0000
I have installed mail server under Linux 2.2.1 (RH 5.1). Everything is
OK, when I use the same Linux computer for sending and receiving mail
massages. But when I try to connect to this server from Win95 (I use
Outlook 97) I cannot even log in.
Which settings should I change to make Linux work as POP3 server for
Win95?
Thanks at advance,
Kamil
------------------------------
From: MaxFreedom@(no spam)free-market.net (Max Freedom)
Subject: Samba strangeness
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 20:25:25 GMT
I've got two Windows boxes (95 & 98) and a Red Hat 5.2 box (called
sparge) connected to a 3Com LAN modem (which acts as the nameserver).
The two Windows boxes share files without any problems, and I can
browse their exports via Network Neighborhood.
The Linux box is running Samba (samba-1.9.18p10-5) and can see its own
shares and those on the Windows systems.
Following the troubleshooting section of the Samba book, I did:
net view \\sparge
On the W95 system. It complained it couldn't find sparge, so I created
an lmhosts file. That "fixed" the "net view" problem, and I was able
to successfully map the samba shares.
The wierdness is that after a while (reboot?), the W95 system can no
longer open the samba shares. If I redo the "net view", the shares
start working again. Sounds like some kind of timeout problem. Sparge
never does show up in Network Neighborhood.
The Windows 98 box has another problem. It needs the "new view" hack,
too, but every time I try to map a drive, it says the password is
wrong (it's not).
Any ideas what's wrong? Why does sparge have to be lmhosts before the
Windows boxes see it? I'll be happy to provide further
details--including tcpdump output if necessary--upon request.
--
Max Freedom, MaxFreedom(at)free-market.net
web.infoave.net/~dsill
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Crossposted-To:
alt.linux,alt.os.linux,linux.redhat,linux.redhat.misc,comp.windows.x.kde
Subject: Re: where to find qt 1.42
Date: 21 Feb 1999 18:33:29 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark I Manning IV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Carlos A wrote:
: >
: > I'm looking for the RPM version of QT 1.42 and I can't find it anywhere.
: > Even tried redhat's site.
: >
: > Does anybody have a link where to find it?
: >
: > Tanks in advance.
: --
: If you sit down at a game of poker and dont see a sucker...
: Get UP, your teh sucker!
: qt version 1.42 required gtk+ version 1.1.x. If you install gtk+ 1.1.x
: overwriting the older 1.0.x gtk+ thn you will probably breeak
: dependancies. The only way arround this is to have BOTH versions of
: gtk+ installed on your system at teh same time.
: THIS HAS TO BE THE LAMEST SETUP IVE EVER SEEN!
QT does not require GTK at all. So something is broken in your setup. So
to use you words: YOU HAVE A LAME SETUP.
(Ever wondered why there was a fierce argument about wether one should use
Qt or GTK.)
Hugo.
--
+------------------------+------------------------------+
| Hugo van der Kooij | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Oranje Nassaustraat 16 | http://www.caiw.nl/~hvdkooij |
| 3155 VJ Maasland | (De man met de rode hoed) |
+------------------------+------------------------------+
"Computers let you make more mistakes faster than any other invention in
human history, with the possible exception of handguns and tequila."
(Mitch Radcliffe)
------------------------------
From: "David Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet mysteriously non-functional, refuses connections
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 17:47:08 GMT
I'm experiencing a similar problem, although I at least get to the
login/password prompts. I've seen this problem posted a number of times to
this newsgroup, but the suggestions are always the same, which are to check
the obvious (as you've also done). I'm sure the problem is really simple,
but I've pretty much given up on it. I'm posting again partly to commiserate
with you, but also in hopes that someone will, once and for all, enlighten
us as to what the problem is with Telnet under Linux.
Porphyrous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7aot5r$226$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>Hello all....
>
>telnet is pretty much an aim and squirt service. So, I'm stuck on where to
>go with this.
>
>* I try to telnet.
>* Says trying 192.168.1.1 (which is the right address).
>* Says Connected to wesley.porphyrous.org (which is right name resolved)
>* Says Escape character is '^]'
>* Nothing else happens
>* Within 10 seconds, says Connection closed by foreign host.
>
>The behavior is the same regardless of whether or not I'm dialed out. I've
>checked hosts.deny (ALL: ALL) and hosts.allow (ALL: LOCAL), hosts and
>resolv.conf look okay. I'm a little mystified, because there isn't much
>more to telnet than that, is there?
>
>I'm running Red Hat 5.1, kernel 2.0.36.
>
>
>
>--
> porphyrous (por' fi Rus) adj. 1. Of or pertaining to the color purple.
>David L. Vessell | Tualatin, Oregon | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://www.pobox.com/~porphyrous | http://www.pobox.com/~lpo
> SUPPORT THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OREGON
------------------------------
From: "Coleman Ammerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba problems
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 19:17:45 -0600
i had the same problem with smb status reporting that processes were
running...
somehow the line in /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions (which is in commonly used
status function):
pid=`ps auxww | grep '[^[]'$1 | awk '{print $2}'`
falsely reports that $1 is running...
i changed mine to the following almost identical line:
pid=`ps auxww | grep '[^]]'$1 | awk '{print $2}'`
the "[^[]" had to be some fancy way of preventing the grep from coming
back...
and i don't know why it does... but mine variation works -- don't know
why...
if they are truly being brought back up -- after changing the above...
then look towards your /etc/inetd.conf for entries that will automatically
start smbd and nmbd
-coleman
Rick Westmacott wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>It seems that smbd and nmbd are attempting to load as part of the boot
>process. However when i do a ps aux | grep smbd, it has not started.
>Next when I do a ./smb status, I get the message that both the smbd and
>nmbd are in fact running. If I execute this command many times I get
>the message that the processes are running but each time under different
>PIDS. It looks like the processes are dying and being brought up
>repeatedly. Other than that i seem to have a healthy TCP network and
>can ping my windows 98 PC's alright.
>
>
>
>Any ideas would be appreciated.
>
>
>Thanks
>
>
>Rick
>
------------------------------
From: Daniel Koerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.redhat
Subject: Redhat 5.2 & Linksys EtherPCI LanCard II Problems PLEASE HELP!!
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 00:30:41 GMT
Hi Folks,
Here's my setup:
- Linux Redhat 5.2 with 2.0.36 kernel.
- Generic NE2000 Ethernet card (detected by Linux, connected to
Internet and working fine)
- Linksys Combo EtherPCI LanCard II (not detected, not working)
OK, I've been trying to configure a second net card on my Linux machine
so that I can setup IP Masquerading. I have read and re-read all of the
relevent FAQs & HOW-TOs in regards to Ethernet & IP Masquerading setup.
The first net card (Generic NE2000 which is connected to my cable modem)
is working perfectly in Linux. It is detected on boot as eth0 and
assigned an IRQ and Base Address just fine.
The second card is a different story. It is a Linksys Combo EtherPCI
Lan Card II. According to the HOW-TOs I have read and the Linksys
website, this card should work with the generic ne2000 driver (ne.o). I
have tried every different combination of things I can think of to get
this bugger working to no avail. I have the following in my
/etc/conf.modules:
alias eth0 tulip
alias eth1 ne
I even tried this:
alias eth0 tulip
alias eth1 ne
options ne io=0x6800 irq=12
...this didn't work either.
I have also tried adding an append line in my lilo.conf:
append="ether=12,0x6800,eth1"
(I also made sure I typed "lilo" at the prompt and rebooted after doing
this)
...no dice, again.
Now, when I reboot, eth0 shows up in the boot log just fine as always.
However, no matter what I do, eth1 will not show up. If I do this:
modprobe eth1 dmesg | tail
I get:
ne.c:v1.10 9/23/94 Donald becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
NE*000 ethercard probe at 0x6800:00 20 78 10 13 4b
eth1: NE2000 found at 0x6800, using IRQ 12
So apparently it is able to detect the net card. Why won't it detect it
at boot and why won't the netcard work, though?
If anybody has any ideas on this or experience with this card, please
let me know. I'm desperately in need of getting IP Masquerading going
as soon as possible. Please feel free to email any replies directly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks a lot,
Daniel Koerner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jedi)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Firewall with 1 IP
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 11:45:27 -0800
On Sun, 21 Feb 1999 15:44:13 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > - My ISP has asigned me 1 static IP.
>> > - I have a LAN, and 3 NT Web servers on it that I want to make available to
>> > Inet with 192.168.X.X IPs.
>> >
>> > - I want to put a Linux RedHat 5.2 based firewall before the LAN.
>> >
>> > Would it be possible with just 1 IP, maybe with IP Masquerading or
>should I
>> > ask for a Class C Network?
>> >
>> > -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>> > http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>> >
>> You don't need to ask for a Class C. You can do *nearly* everything you
>> could possibly want with a masquerading Linux firewall, port forwarding,
>> and proxies.
>
> Ok, so what's the software I should apply then? What would you recommend?
>
> Could I implement everything with just ipfwadm?
Yup... read the IP-Masquerade FAQ. For your purposes it
should be an effective walkthru.
--
Herding Humans ~ Herding Cats
Neither will do a thing unless they really want to, or |||
is coerced to the point where it will scratch your eyes out / | \
as soon as your grip slips.
In search of sane PPP docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com
------------------------------
From: "Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Problem: ifconfig, route, and Kernel 2.2.1
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 01:28:05 GMT
Jeff,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7an6pr$cpi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello, everyone.
>
>I recently upgraded my RH5.2 machine to Kernel 2.2.1. I upgraded all of the
>required RPMs as described on RedHat's support site, and configured and
>compiled the 2.2.1 kernel specifically for my machine. Everything worked
>fine, except for my cable modem.
>
>I am using Time Warner's RoadRunner service, and have been operating
>flawlessly under 2.0.36 for quite some time. However, upon upgrading to
>2.2.1, I get a "No route to host" message when trying to contact any host
>other than my machine's IP address (and loopback still works.) This is
>preventing my RoadRunner login daemon from logging me in to the RoadRunner
>network. However, even if it were able to do so, it would do me no good as
I
>would still have no route to any hosts on the net.
>
Are you using dhcp to get your IP address from RoadRunner? Looks like you
might have the same prob I did on @home. The new kernel 2.2 requires the
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup file to be edited to reflect the new
dhcp client. The changes necessary can be found at
http://www.vortech.net/rrlinux/redhat.htm .
If those changes don't do it, I also found out from my cable service that
the DNS numbers that were dished out by the dhcp server would not work with
Linux so confirm with your service that they are the correct ones for Linux.
What I did to work around the bad DNS numbers supplied automatically was to
put a line in my rc.local file to copy my version of /etc/resolv.conf (with
the good numbers) over the one changed by the dhcpcd. Also,
>[root@zeus jkhoffman]# netstat -nr
>Kernel IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
>127.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 lo
>24.93.79.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
>24.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
>0.0.0.0 24.93.79.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
your output and hang symptoms from /sbin/route look exactly like mine did,
as does the netstat output. Once the correct DNSs are in then the line
referencing your gateway address (using netstat) should start with the word
'default'.
I have been struggling with the above all weekend so it's fresh in my
mind...hope this works for you.
Kelly
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.x,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Multilink PPP in Linux with 2 x V90 = 105,333 bps?
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 1999 18:51:52 GMT
On Sat, 20 Feb 1999 09:53:31 +0000, Jason Clifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, 19 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Care to explain how... EQL is NOT ML-PPP and the ML-PPP driver for
>> linux only works in kernel 2.1.36-2.1.48 and was incompleate. do you
>> know something we don't?
>
>Going from the documentation in /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/README.eql that
>is what it is billed as although I note that the documentation is old and
>the utilities it refers to are not present on a standard RH system.
>
>To be honest I have never set up EQL as I have never needed it.
>
>Jason Clifford
>Definite Linux Systems
>http://definite.ukpost.com/
>
I got the utils from metalab. they work from linux to linux. takes
time to learn how to set it up especially if you want to persist
conection. EQL uses a unique way of doing the load balanceing.
everyother ip packet was sent over the other line...one here, one
there and so one.
ML-PPP actually will split an IP packet and send part over one line
and part over the other. You can get eql to work with ml-ppp linux to
nt but that's it.
ML-PPP need to send a request to channel bond before it will work with
an ISP. The ML-PPP driver for linux is still missing this one simple
feature. (as well as updateing it to work with 2.2.x) it does't have
the capability but takes some very cleaver scripts and knowlege of the
system you are connecting to to get it to work right. I have only
been able to bond outgoing channels. but incomming still comes in
through one modem.
tng
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
