Linux-Networking Digest #310, Volume #10 Fri, 26 Feb 99 06:13:41 EST
Contents:
Re: Setserial High Speed Help (Frank da Cruz)
where is linux-friendly ISP? (Henry Lu)
Re: PCI modems in linux? ("Nik Alston")
Re: linux_router&performance ("Volker Hett")
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (Nick Kew)
Re: How to get FTP working through our Linux Firewall? (Rick Onanian)
Printing to Linux from Winblows 95/NT ("Jonas")
Again: LCP error: Receive serial link is not 8 bit clean (Holger Raschke)
Re: TCP/IP works telnet ("Patrick Berge")
Re: Apache on a Beowulf cluster? (Chris Shenton)
HP LaserJet 4 with own IP address ("J. J. Horner")
Acesso ao rlogin como root ("Angelo Ribeiro")
Re: Linux and IP Masquarading ("John Hardin")
Re: MCSE preparation exams ("Pad")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank da Cruz)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: Setserial High Speed Help
Date: 24 Feb 1999 19:07:21 GMT
In article <7b191j$ss0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
C Lance Moxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I need a hand with setserial. I have installed a Lavaport PCI serial
: card (UART 16650) on a RedHat 5.2 system with the default RedHat kernel.
: I can talk to both new serial ports just fine, but I can't talk to them
: with any speed over 115200bps. I installed this card to use with an
: external ISDN T/A and I want to get the maximum throughput from the
: serial port. What I don't understand is the "baud_base" and the "divisor"
: options with setserial. How do I set these to allow 230400bps? I'd
: like to use Kermit to talk to the T/A at that rate.
:
I don't know about setserial or your serial card, but C-Kermit 7.0
(currently in Beta test) supports high serial speeds in Linux in the normal
POSIX way, i.e. without any of the hacks found in previous releases.
C-Kermit's list of supported speeds on any particular platform comes from
its scanning of the appropriate header files at compile time, and can be
seen by typing:
set speed ?
at the C-Kermit> prompt. In Red Hat 5.2, where speeds are defined in
/usr/include/termbits.h, serial speeds up to 460800 bps are supported.
C-Kermit 7.0 can be found at:
http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/ck70.html
By the way, if anybody would care to try building it on older Linux
systems and/or on non-Intel platforms, please let me know.
Thanks.
- Frank
------------------------------
From: Henry Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: where is linux-friendly ISP?
Date: 24 Feb 1999 19:17:08 GMT
I have been using a local linux-friendly ISP for years. Recently there
service is going down hell. I plan to switch. Here is serveral choices
that recommended by my friend with good connection speed:
MSN, AOL, Prodigy, etc national ISPs. Are these ISP linux-friendly?
What are your recommendations?
------------------------------
From: "Nik Alston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PCI modems in linux?
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 18:51:00 -0000
>
>I have a Diamond Supra Express 56i PCI and I can't seem to make it work
>on linux. I checked at the Diamond Page and there's a paper that says
>that Supra's are Traditional Modem. It has a rockwell chipset. I've
>heard that rockwell has proprietary pci comunication protocoll. Is the
>case for this modem ???
i have one of these and spoke to diamon tech support. This modem is
controllor-less, i.e. it NEEDS drivers to work properly, and they only have
drivers for Windows (95/98/NT)
nik
------------------------------
From: "Volker Hett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: linux_router&performance
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 19:32:52 +0100
Andreas Schuster wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hallo!
.
.
.
>want to use 90 computers with the same router. Does anybody know,
>whether we have to expect performance-problems?
>
>Thanks for the help!
>
>Andreas
Hallo Andreas,
we have arround 130 PC�s on a 100MHz Pentium with 32 MB as Firewall and
Router. With IP Masquerading, transparent redirection and even a (very)
small Squid Cache. It routes arround 5 GByte a month with a load averege of
0,06 ! It even runs netacct without problems and generates arround 100MByte
accountig Data in February.
Configuration:
MB Chaintech IEM (Intel FX), Pentium 100, 32MB EDO, NCR53C810, 2 GByte HP
C2490A-300, HP-100VG ANY-Lan NIC internal and Noname Realtec 8029 (aka
ne2k-pci) external NIC.
The Squid Cache is configured to use 8MB RAM an 100MB Diskspace, but it has
a BIG parrent (HP Netserver, 200MHz Pentium, 128MB RAM 16GByte Diskarray) on
the 100MBit Network.
Have Fun
Volker Hett
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick Kew)
Crossposted-To:
vmsnet.networks.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.domain,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 11:09:53 +0000
>> Mine is Earth with domain =galaxy and another is after roman themes,
>> Odin,Thor,Thor1. Domain is Valhalla.
>>
>
> Odin, Thor, Valhalla are Norse (Teutonic)
Well, I used Norse naming[1] whilst based in Rome.
Maybe he's right after all? :-)
[1] (including my domain name: the first WebThing back in '95 was a web
conferencing application - "Thing" = old English / old Norse Forum
or Parliament).
--
Nick Kew
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to get FTP working through our Linux Firewall?
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 14:15:03 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> We have a linux firewall and are trying to gain access to an FTP site that is
> hosted on a Win NT IIS machine behind our firewall. However, everytime we try
> to access the site from outside the company (going through the firewall) the
> ftp program (in this case WSFTP PRO) can't connect because the address that is
> returned to the ftp client is 10.24.1.9 (or something like that). This, of
> course, is an invalid internet address and only valid on our LAN. So, the
> connection fails.
It seems that you have ip masquerading on your firewall, then?
And the other servers behind the firewall..how do they work? You use
port forwarding?
Keep in mind, FTP uses multiple ports. 21, 20, plus other ports that
it opens up each time you initiate a transfer.
Also, it might help to load the ip_masq_ftp module.
> We have other applications/ports going through our firewall just fine, such
> as our web server. Even the IIS web server (port 80) works, but this FTP
> thing is not going through and we can't figure it out. We have looked at our
> three (3) DNS systems, Firewall rinetd daemon, the permissions on the IIS
> server for FTP access.
>
> Any clues?
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Of course...if you're not set up like I said, than all I said would
be useless. :)
rick
===============
My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone else. I do not
represent
anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer. Cows go moo.
---
Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior, beat-up
rustbucket
that is in need of a lot of restoration and TLC. Must be cheap...I'm
broke.
---
Reply to me at either thc <at sign here> psynet <dot> net or
rick <at sign> mail <dot> artmold <dot> com
------------------------------
From: "Jonas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.samba
Subject: Printing to Linux from Winblows 95/NT
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 11:40:33 +0100
Hi
I have an old HP4si printer with a JetDirect card wich I have connected to
my network. The JetDirect card is the old kind without built in printqueue.
I've successfully configured my RedHat 5.2 Linux server so that I can print
testpages from it. What I want to do is to share this printer over the
network with Samba using my Linux box as spool/queue. The computers (Windows
95/NT) can se the printer but when I install the printer driver and try to
print a testpage it reports that it can't find the printer. What have I done
wrong? What do I have to do to make this work?
Sorry for the double posting but I don't know if this is a network or Samba
problem.
TIA. /Jonas
------------------------------
From: Holger Raschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Again: LCP error: Receive serial link is not 8 bit clean
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 20:02:53 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello everyone,
again a cry for help because of this LCP message (receive serial link is
not 8 bit clean).
Although I read all the hints and tips in this newsgroup, I'm really
getting
mad about this.
I'm running SuSE Linux 5.3 (kernel 2.0.35) on an i486 PC.
For automatic dial-in I run diald 0.16 / pppd 2.2.0.
To be sure, that there is no failure with the pap-parameters, I ran
pppd manually:
pppd connect 'chat -v "" ATZ OK ATDT023319800 CONNECT ""' /dev/ttyS1
38400
========options file in /etc/ppp:==============
lock
debug
crtscts
modem
defaultroute
noipdefault
remotename bonsai.fernuni-hagen.de
user <USERNAME>
Usually these manual connects are established without any error.
I attached one session log as example at the end of this message.
Then I went to automatic dial-in via diald. The configuration was
OK for some internet-connections, but then the horror began ...
With the same configuration settings I get one or some consecutive
connections established with no error. Then, suddenly, the LCP error
occurs
and there will be no good connection any more; sometimes it help to
reboot the server.
I tried out everything I read in the documentation, the newsgroups and
some
books. But nothing really solved the problem.
Manual connects don't fail as usual.
Any clues or hints of you, experts?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Holger
================================================================
Now following: configuration files and one bad/good session log.
=======diald options============================
lock
device /dev/ttyS1
crtscts
modem
-m ppp
speed 38400
two-way
local 127.0.0.3
remote 127.0.0.2
reroute
defaultroute
dynamic
disconnect-timeout 120
redial-timeout 30
dial-fail-limit 5
fifo /var/run/diald.ctl
=======pppd options file via diald=======================
debug
lcp-max-configure 30
noipdefault
remotename bonsai.fernuni-hagen.de
user "XXXXXXXX"
======diald chat file ========================
TIMEOUT 60
ABORT "NO CARRIER"
ABORT BUSY
ABORT "NO DIALTONE"
ABORT ERROR
"" +++AT&F OK
ATZ OK
AT+FCLASS=0 OK
ATM1 OK
ATDT023319800
CONNECT "\c"
=======session log failed dial=in via diald==========
Feb 23 22:31:42 linux diald[141]: Running connect (pid = 1312).
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: timeout set to 60 seconds
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: abort on (BUSY)
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: abort on (ERROR)
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: send (+++AT&F^M)
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: expect (OK)
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: AT&F^M^M
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: OK -- got it
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: send (ATZ^M)
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: expect (OK)
Feb 23 22:31:43 linux chat[1312]: ^M
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: ATZ^M^M
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: OK -- got it
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: send (AT+FCLASS=0^M)
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: expect (OK)
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: ^M
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: AT+FCLASS=0^M^M
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: OK -- got it
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: send (ATM1^M)
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: expect (OK)
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: ^M
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: ATM1^M^M
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: OK -- got it
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: send (ATDT023319800^M)
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: expect (CONNECT)
Feb 23 22:31:44 linux chat[1312]: ^M
Feb 23 22:32:16 linux chat[1312]: ATDT023319800^M^M
Feb 23 22:32:16 linux diald[141]: Running pppd (pid = 1321).
Feb 23 22:32:16 linux chat[1312]: CONNECT -- got it
Feb 23 22:32:16 linux chat[1312]: send ()
Feb 23 22:32:23 linux kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
allocation)
Feb 23 22:32:23 linux kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code
copyright 1995 Caldera, Inc.
Feb 23 22:32:23 linux kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
Feb 23 22:32:23 linux kernel: registered device ppp0
Feb 23 22:32:23 linux pppd[1321]: pppd 2.2.0 started by root, uid 0
Feb 23 22:32:23 linux pppd[1321]: Using interface ppp0
Feb 23 22:32:23 linux pppd[1321]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
Feb 23 22:32:23 linux pppd[1321]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<magic 0x51ad46ab> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 23 22:32:56 linux last message repeated 11 times
Feb 23 22:33:14 linux last message repeated 6 times
Feb 23 22:33:16 linux diald[141]: pppd startup timed out. Check your
pppd options. Killing pppd.
Feb 23 22:33:17 linux pppd[1321]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<magic 0x51ad46ab> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 23 22:33:20 linux pppd[1321]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<magic 0x51ad46ab> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 23 22:33:22 linux pppd[1321]: Terminating on signal 15.
Feb 23 22:33:22 linux pppd[1321]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x2]
Feb 23 22:33:25 linux pppd[1321]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x3]
Feb 23 22:33:28 linux pppd[1321]: Connection terminated.
Feb 23 22:33:28 linux pppd[1321]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit
clean:
Feb 23 22:33:28 linux pppd[1321]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
Feb 23 22:33:28 linux pppd[1321]: Exit.
============session log good dial=in via diald===========
Feb 23 20:53:05 linux diald[141]: Running connect (pid = 899).
Feb 23 20:53:05 linux chat[899]: timeout set to 60 seconds
Feb 23 20:53:05 linux chat[899]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Feb 23 20:53:05 linux chat[899]: abort on (BUSY)
Feb 23 20:53:05 linux chat[899]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
Feb 23 20:53:05 linux chat[899]: abort on (ERROR)
Feb 23 20:53:05 linux chat[899]: send (+++AT&F^M)
Feb 23 20:53:05 linux chat[899]: expect (OK)
Feb 23 20:53:05 linux chat[899]: AT&F^M^M
Feb 23 20:53:05 linux chat[899]: OK -- got it
Feb 23 20:53:05 linux chat[899]: send (ATZ^M)
Feb 23 20:53:06 linux chat[899]: expect (OK)
Feb 23 20:53:06 linux chat[899]: ^M
Feb 23 20:53:06 linux chat[899]: ATZ^M^M
Feb 23 20:53:06 linux chat[899]: OK -- got it
Feb 23 20:53:06 linux chat[899]: send (AT+FCLASS=0^M)
Feb 23 20:53:06 linux chat[899]: expect (OK)
Feb 23 20:53:06 linux chat[899]: ^M
Feb 23 20:53:06 linux chat[899]: AT+FCLASS=0^M^M
Feb 23 20:53:06 linux chat[899]: OK -- got it
Feb 23 20:53:06 linux chat[899]: send (ATM1^M)
Feb 23 20:53:07 linux chat[899]: expect (OK)
Feb 23 20:53:07 linux chat[899]: ^M
Feb 23 20:53:07 linux chat[899]: ATM1^M^M
Feb 23 20:53:07 linux chat[899]: OK -- got it
Feb 23 20:53:07 linux chat[899]: send (ATDT023319800^M)
Feb 23 20:53:07 linux chat[899]: expect (CONNECT)
Feb 23 20:53:07 linux chat[899]: ^M
Feb 23 20:53:39 linux chat[899]: ATDT023319800^M^M
Feb 23 20:53:39 linux chat[899]: CONNECT -- got it
Feb 23 20:53:39 linux chat[899]: send ()
Feb 23 20:53:39 linux diald[141]: Running pppd (pid = 917).
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
allocation)
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code
copyright 1995 Caldera, Inc.
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux kernel: registered device ppp0
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: pppd 2.2.0 started by root, uid 0
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: Using interface ppp0
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<magic 0x86ff4913> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00>
<mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05 f4>
< 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5e e5 bf>]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 00 04 00 00>
< 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5e e5 bf>]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<magic 0x86ff4913> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1524>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mru 1524>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1
user="XXXXXXXX" password="XXXXXXXX"]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1msg=""]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: Remote message:
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
0.0.0.0> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: sent [IPXCP ConfReq id=0x1 <network 0>
<node 0000896c02ec> <router proto 2> <complete>]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <compress VJ
0f 01> <addr 132.176.114.246>]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 <compress VJ
0f 01> <addr 132.176.114.246>]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 11 06 00 01
01 03>]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 23 20:53:44 linux pppd[917]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 06 00 01
01 03>]
Feb 23 20:53:45 linux pppd[917]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
132.176.122.180>]
Feb 23 20:53:45 linux pppd[917]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
132.176.122.180> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Feb 23 20:53:45 linux pppd[917]: rcvd [LCP ProtRej id=0x3 80 2b 01 01 00
18 01 06 00 00 00 00 02 08 00 00 89 6c 02 ec 04 04 00 02 06 02]
Feb 23 20:53:45 linux pppd[917]: rcvd [CCP ConfRej id=0x1]
Feb 23 20:53:45 linux pppd[917]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2 <addr
132.176.122.180> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Feb 23 20:53:45 linux pppd[917]: local IP address 132.176.122.180
Feb 23 20:53:45 linux pppd[917]: remote IP address 132.176.114.246
Feb 23 20:53:46 linux diald[141]: New addresses: local 132.176.122.180,
remote 132.176.114.246
=======session log manual connect with pppd================
Feb 22 22:41:08 linux pppd[1402]: pppd 2.2.0 started by root, uid 0
Feb 22 22:41:09 linux chat[1405]: send (ATZ^M)
Feb 22 22:41:09 linux chat[1405]: expect (OK)
Feb 22 22:41:10 linux chat[1405]: ^M
Feb 22 22:41:10 linux chat[1405]: OK -- got it
Feb 22 22:41:10 linux chat[1405]: send (ATDT023319800^M)
Feb 22 22:41:10 linux chat[1405]: expect (CONNECT)
Feb 22 22:41:10 linux chat[1405]: ^M
Feb 22 22:41:42 linux chat[1405]: ATDT023319800^M^M
Feb 22 22:41:42 linux chat[1405]: CONNECT -- got it
Feb 22 22:41:42 linux chat[1405]: send (^M)
Feb 22 22:41:42 linux pppd[1402]: Serial connection established.
Feb 22 22:41:43 linux pppd[1402]: Using interface ppp0
Feb 22 22:41:43 linux pppd[1402]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS1
Feb 22 22:41:43 linux pppd[1402]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<magic 0x3f9d0427> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 00 04 00
00> <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05
f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5e e5 bf>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 00 04 00
00> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 5e e5 bf>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <mru 1500>
<magic 0x3f9d0427> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <mru 1524>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x2 <mru 1524>
<asyncmap 0xa0000> <auth pap> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1
user="XXXXXXX" password="XXXXXXXXX"]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1msg=""]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: Remote message:
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr
0.0.0.0> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: sent [IPXCP ConfReq id=0x1 <network 0>
<node 0000a918a270> <router proto 2> <complete>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <compress VJ
0f 01> <addr 132.176.114.246>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 <compress VJ
0f 01> <addr 132.176.114.246>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 11 06 00 01
01 03>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 06 00 01
01 03>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr
132.176.122.188>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr
132.176.122.188> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: rcvd [LCP ProtRej id=0x3 80 2b 01 01
00 18 01 06 00 00 00 00 02 08 00 00 a9 18 a2 70 04 04 00 02 06 02]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: rcvd [CCP ConfRej id=0x1]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2 <addr
132.176.122.188> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: local IP address 132.176.122.188
Feb 22 22:41:44 linux pppd[1402]: remote IP address 132.176.114.246
------------------------------
From: "Patrick Berge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: TCP/IP works telnet
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 05:43:41 -0500
Luca Filipozzi wrote in message ...
>In article <oy6B2.1825$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>says...
>Are you trying to login as root? Intentional security measures prevent
>root from logging on via telnet (all someone has to do is sniff the
>packet for the root password).
>
>So, rather than tell you how to defeat this, let me suggest two other
>ways of accessing your box...
>
>1) login as a normal user an "su" to become root
>2) install SSH (secure shell)
>
>SSH is the preferred option. Right from the get go, the link is encrypted
>with a PGP-style private-key public-key method. Works great. Install the
>daemon on the linux box and get an SSH client for whatever box you are
>working on (yes, there are free 95/NT SSH clients).
>
>Hope this helps,
>
>Luca
>--
>Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I tried root and I also tried a userid I setup? and did get the userid I
setup to work... sorry I am new to Linux but use AIX at work. At work we
certainly have ssh or some proprietary AIX thing that lets users telnet as
root on a per machine basis. Gee I just thought Red Hat would ship with a
ssh ??? Well I guess that's what I get for assuming proprietary UNIX
security comes setup with Linux.
Thanks for the info. Oh yea I am using Win95 for this email... I can't wait
until our PCs can run multiple OSes concurrently. I hate rebooting my
machine just to switch OSes. I think I am going to be buying VMWare for
personal use as soon it is out.
------------------------------
From: Chris Shenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.sys.super
Subject: Re: Apache on a Beowulf cluster?
Date: 24 Feb 1999 14:15:38 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Lindahl) writes:
> There is a Linux equivalent of Cisco LocalDirector, in addition to the free
> "squid" proxy mentioned earlier.
Check www.eddieware.org: multiplatform open source web redirectorys,
load-balancing DNSs, and (future?) content replication. Looks young
but promising.
------------------------------
From: "J. J. Horner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: HP LaserJet 4 with own IP address
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 14:33:02 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==============731C98CF9FB628B767674900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
My network has an HP LaserJef 4 (many, actually) setup with their own IP
address on the network. They are plugged directly into the network. Is
there any way to set up my Linux box to act as the server for these
printers?
thanks.
--
J. J. Horner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator and Support
==============731C98CF9FB628B767674900
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
My network has an HP LaserJef 4 (many, actually) setup with their own IP
address on the network. They are plugged directly into the network.
Is there any way to set up my Linux box to act as the server for these
printers?
<P>thanks.
<PRE>--
J. J. Horner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network Administrator and Support</PRE>
</HTML>
==============731C98CF9FB628B767674900==
------------------------------
From: "Angelo Ribeiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Acesso ao rlogin como root
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 02:29:04 -0300
Oi Pessoal,
Gostaria de saber quais as configura��es necess�rias para acessar pelo
rlogin de um computador a outro tendo o acesso como usu�rio root, pois tenho
o sistema de banco de dados em testes e � importante ter esse acesso por
rlogin como usu�rio root.
Agrade�o qualquer ajuda,
Angelo Ribeiro
Obs.: Qualquer pessoa que programe em Interbase para Linus usando banco de
dados por favor e-mail me. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and IP Masquarading
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 11:20:52 -0800
Luca Filipozzi wrote in message ...
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
>> I've been reading some of the HOWTO's on Masquarading and would like to
know
>> if anyone has managed (or even tried) to have local network users go out
>> onto the internet through a Linux IP Masquarading server using
Microsofts
>> PPTP (Point to Point Tunneling Protocol)
>>
>> nik
>>
>Yes. Take a look at John Hardin's page: http://www.wolfenet.com/~jhardin/
>
>It's good stuff.
>--
>Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gee, thanks!
BTW, IPSEC+ISAKMP masq will be peeking out here shortly, as well.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
=======================================================================
If you spend any time administering Windows NT, you're far too
familiar with the Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) ...
- "MSDN Flash" email newsletter, 2/9/1999
------------------------------
From: "Pad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: MCSE preparation exams
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.x
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 09:39:30 GMT
Each OS has its uses.
I like using Linux for firewalling my LAN and running services that only a
UNIX-based server can provide (on a minimal system without BSODing). And I
like using NT Workstation as a desktop OS...
Josh Rasey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article
<tOlA2.17$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Amen! etc...
>
> WIndows NT is fortunatley or Un, here for awhile and tends
> to make its appearance in many a Unix 'temple'. Understanding
> both of these beasts is the key to a happy network, though
> when you throw in Win9X, you are generally screwed
> no matter what you do... :)
>
> -Josh (who likes both NT and UNIX/Linux)
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
> <7as9rn$hqu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Hmm. I'm a *nix sysadmin, after a fashion. And I found preparing for
the
> >MCP/ MCSE tests to be fairly illuminating. The network I run has a
> >heterogenous mix of Win98, WinNT Workstation, and Linux/X workstations
> >attached. Anything I can wrap my brain around that makes it all work
> >smoother is a godsend.
> >
> >
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Tim Lines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Not completely. I know a couple of professional Unix Sysadmins who
value
> MCSE
> >> certification quite highly. Care to guess about the quality of work
they
> turn
> >> out?
> >>
> >> Don't bother, I wont keep you in suspense. After working with one
for a
> >year,
> >> I've never seen him fix anything. He breaks something at least twice
a
> week.
> >> He's very personable and spouts buzzwords in meetings. I've never seen
> the
> >other
> >> one actually touch a unix box although I hear that she has. Since
I've
> never
> >> seen her break anything, she rates quite a bit higher than the first.
> >>
> >> Both of them will ocassionally read newsgroups. Only at work of
course.
> >>
> >> If this guy would accept a company P.O., they would order this stuff
REAL
> >FAST.
> >>
> >> Jayasuthan [VorHacker] wrote:
> >>
> >> > In comp.os.linux.misc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Is this guy lost or what !
> >> >
> >> > : I have MCSE exam simulation prep materials for sale, $20 US each.
> Email
> >for
> >> > : more information and list if interested.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >-------------------------------------------------
> >R. Christopher Harshman: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> >http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
>
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
