Linux-Networking Digest #323, Volume #10 Sat, 27 Feb 99 17:14:07 EST
Contents:
NFS on my RH5.2 system doesn't work, help needed (Maarten Sanders)
Autofs setup woes (Solaris / Linux Environment) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: PCI modems in linux? ("Bob Stickel")
Ftp file system (David Campbell)
Peewee needs help ("Gumby")
Re: NFS and Win95 ("Bruce")
Re: smbmount won't work (Blake Sorensen)
HELP: No DNS resolution after using linuxconf in RH5.2 (Kevin Mack)
Re: Linux PPP Server ("Ger Donners")
Re: static IP's (Juergen Heinzl)
peer to peer ("MagnuM")
Re: tn3270 connection?? (Edmund H. Ramm)
Re: domain name reg and IP setup (Rod Roark)
Re: printing to JetDirect problem ("M. Lewis")
Re: @Home setup (JoHn DoH)
Re: BIG network problem! ("Ger Donners")
Re: Change machine name?? ("Ger Donners")
NEWBIE: Dhcpcd problem. ("Leo Stutzmann")
Re: Configuring DNS with Linux and W95 ("Ger Donners")
Gateway config help ("Corporate Collection Services")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Maarten Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NFS on my RH5.2 system doesn't work, help needed
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 22:57:49 +0100
Hi everyone,
I am trying to get rid of Bill's crap an have managed to install RH5.2
on my system. To install it on my system I downloaded evreything to our
NT server in installed it on my system bt ftp. Now we also want to do
the server but we do not have suffiecienh harddisk space on that system
and thus I put everything on my machine in the dir /usr/pub/ftp/. The
bad news now is that I cannot mount that dir with NFS, and this is where
I need your help.
Today I managed to install a kernel update (2.0.36-3) but this
(obvious)_ did not resove the problem.
What did I do to get my machine working as a NFS server?
1) I started portmap. (I checked with "ps" but I see nothing, on the
other hand I see it when I boot/shutdown as a service)
2) I followed the instructions in Redhat system configuration and also
checked the NFS-howto:
exports looks like (note, I am 10.0.0.4, nt server 10.0.0.6):
/pub/usr/ftp 10.0.0.4(ro,insecure)
/pub/usr/ftp 10.0.0.6(ro,insecure)
Redhat made its own exportfs (and I have also ranit manually) and when I
type "rpcinfo -p":
program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 rpcbind
100000 2 udp 111 rpcbind
100005 1 udp 635 mountd
100005 2 udp 635 mountd
100005 1 tcp 635 mountd
100005 2 tcp 635 mountd
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs
Allas,
when I type
"mount -t nfs 10.0.0.4/pub/usr/ftp /root/test" I get:
mount -t nfs 10.0.0.4/pub/usr/ftp failed, reason given by server:
Permission denied
Who can help me to solve this?
One thing I should note: my /proc/filesystems does not contain the line
"nodev nfs", this I read on some page but I cannot find how I can add a
nfs filesystems and besides I do not know if this resolves the problem.
Any help is appreciated, please also reply via e-mail.
Kind regards,
Maarten Sanders
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Autofs setup woes (Solaris / Linux Environment)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 21:53:30 GMT
Hi,
We're have a bit of a problem sorting out autofs on a new install of
Redhat 5.1
Software used: Redhat5.1 (2.0.34), ypbind 3.3 and autofs 3.1.1
We have a number of Suns on-site (Solaris 2.6) which automount home areas
under /home and some applications under /net.
The home areas automount fine, but we can't seem to get /net mounts to work.
================================================
/etc/auto.master file contains:-
+auto_master
/net -hosts
/home auto_home --timeout 60
The /etc/auto_home file contains
+auto.home
=================================================
with the /net -hosts entry in auto.master, cd'ing into /net and doing 'df .'
shows:-
/dev/hda1 30223 20340 8323 71% /
(Obviously the automounter isn't running)
Changing /net -hosts to
/net hosts_byaddr
and placing either +hosts.byaddr -or- +hosts into /etc/hosts_byaddr
gives the following when cd'ing into /net and running 'df .'
automount(pid3069) 0 0 0 0% /net
which looks like the automount should work. But then cd'ing to 'hera' (a host
with an exported filesystem) we get
bash: hera no such file or directory
in /var/log/messages, we get:-
automount[3069]: attempting to mount entry /net/hera
automount[3155]: lookup for hera failed
The only difference I can see between the Linux box and the Solaris box is
the output to 'ypcat -k hosts'
Linux produces
ipaddr ipaddr hostname
whereas Solaris gives
hostname ipaddr hostname
We have tried dumping the output from 'ypcat -k hosts' on a Solaris box to a
file and pointing the entry from auto.master on the Linux box to it. This
still gives the same error.
This is pretty much a show stopper for us.
Can anyone throw any light on what we're doing wrong?
Any help gratefully received :-)
Cheers
Don
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Bob Stickel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PCI modems in linux?
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 17:04:00 -0500
My apologies for a premature posting of possibly incorrect information. I
had a pci modem installed in a box that then had RH5.2 installed on it but
I'm not absolutely sure that this box still has a pci modem in it. It is
offline at the moment but I'm due to make a call to the site this weekend so
I'll check it myself...
Once again, my apologies for the original posting and to those who are
following the thread. I'll repost the news, good or bad, as soon as I can
verify in person.
head hung and eating humble pie.....
Bob
=============================================================
Bob Stickel wrote in message <7amh1l$g0n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have purchased Aopen PCI 56k modems that are either PNP or manual jumper
>settings but are not Winmodems...they're inexpensive and they work fine..
>
>Bob
>=====================
>Eugene wrote in message ...
>>AFAIK all PCI modems are winmodems
>>
>>Doug wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>>Can a PCI modem be used in linux? If so how? Something called a modem
>>>enumerator is installed in windows along with the modem itself and i
>>>dont know what that is. Its creative modmeblaster DI5630 v.90. Its
>>>being used as PnP right now but there are jumpers on it I dont have the
>>>manual so im trying to find out if com and irq can be hard set..
>>>Thanks for any help and please email me a response if possible at
>>>ratchet at tir dot com
>>>Doug
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 08:32:14 +1000
From: David Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ftp file system
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============824182AC88766419255F5AFC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Does anybody know of an FTP file system for linux that supports
put and get of files. I know that userfs has an ftpfs component that
supports read-only ftp. I also know about the "Alex" file system
==============824182AC88766419255F5AFC
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="david.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for David Campbell
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="david.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Campbell;David
tel;work:+617 3216 6015
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:Greenleaf Systems Pty Ltd;
adr:version:2.1;;19 Gregory St;ACACIA RIDGE;QLD;4110;AUSTRALIA
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Director
fn:David Campbell
end:vcard
==============824182AC88766419255F5AFC==
------------------------------
From: "Gumby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Peewee needs help
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 19:06:37 -0500
Hi there!
As i'm reading along, the way to go when you want to setup a web server is
to plug in 2 NICs in your server with one connected to your ISP (i use adsl,
by the way) and the other one to your LAN. But do you really need 2 NICs.
I've read somewhere that if you had a hub with an uplink port, you can plug
the modem into that port and all you need is one NIC in your server. Since i
have 4 systems at home (which includes my old donkey, a 486DX50 with soon to
be installed RH 5.0) and a network hub with an uplink port, will the latter
solution work?
Thanks people, i really appreciate it.
Clandestino
------------------------------
From: "Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS and Win95
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 13:51:40 -0600
ITS WORKING!!!!!
Thanks to all who helped.
My goal was to access a cdrom on a windows machine from my linux machine.
1) Can't use NFS.
2) Use Samba. Luckily for me I already had it installed. Just to dense to
use it.
3) I had to create a lmhosts file in the /etc. I had a hosts file, but
samba was complaining. My lmhosts is identical to my hosts. (If this is
wrong, could someone tell me please.)
4) smbclient -L darmok (darmok being the name of the windows
machine.)
This gives a listing of all shared devices on darmok.
This also took a while (1.5 min). I think I have some more network
tweaking to do someplace.
Also it showed me one mistake I was making. Samba wants the share name
from windows, not the drive letter.
5) smbmount //darmok/cd /mnt/cdrom2
At this point my windows cd (//darmok/cd) is mounted to my linux
filesystem at /mnt/cdrom2
Access time is very good. No waiting on the smbmount command. If
anyone has suggestions on why I had very slow response with smbclient,
please let me know.
Bruce
------------------------------
From: Blake Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb,linux.samba
Subject: Re: smbmount won't work
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 15:20:20 -0500
Andreas Westling wrote:
>
> >and installed Samba 2.0.2. Here is the output:
> >[root@tf linux]# smbmount //BUBBA/D/ /mnt -C -P shared
> >mount error: Invalid argument
> >Please look at smbmount's manual page for possible reasons
I get this same error. The error message in syslog is:
Feb 27 14:42:26 hex kernel: SMBFS: need mount version 6
Is this a libc6 thing maybe? I'm still on libc5...
Running kernel 2.2.1, SMB_FS is defined.
>
> I don't know what the guys did with samba 2.0.2 but smbmount does NOT work
> well... I liked the old system better.
>
> This should work (a bit messy though):
>
> smbmount //BUBBA/D -C -P shared -c "mount /mnt"
Tried this, got:
could not find mount point -C: No such file or directory
I'm using 2.0.2, but I got the same errors on 1.9.something.
man smbmount is about useless for this. The best i got out of it was:
The mount(2) system call does not return any sensible
error code, so you have to guess what failed when you
could not mount a share.
--
Blake Sorensen
Remove the water buffalo filter to send me mail.
"The genius of the American people is that they work, prosper, make
love, have fun, write, invent, achieve, and it does not
matter which group of "bloviators" have control of their capital."
--BBC Washington Correspondent Gavin Esler
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Mack)
Subject: HELP: No DNS resolution after using linuxconf in RH5.2
Date: 27 Feb 1999 20:41:03 GMT
Can anybody help?
Here's the situation...I had my system running just fine (Redhat 5.2)
using dhcp for a cable modem connection. The only thing bothering me was
waiting for sendmail during bootup. I decided to use the linuxconf
program to remove sendmail (and named which was also running) from the
startup using the "control service activity" feature in linuxconf. Now
after making these changes, everything seems to boot up fine. The
network connection seems to be up...i.e. I can ping and traceroute using
ip addresses...but nothing works using fully qualified domain names. For
example, when I try "nslookup ftp.cdrom.com" I get:
>nslookup ftp.cdrom.com
*** Can't find server name for address 24.64.3.139: Non-existent host/domain
*** Can't find server name for address 24.64.3.140: Non-existent host/domain
*** Default servers are not available
The wackiest thing is that all of this worked just fine before. Any ideas
what happened and how to fix it would be greatly appreciated.
Kevin
--
=========================================================================
Kevin Mack
University of Saskatchewan
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: www.engr.usask.ca/~kem400/
=========================================================================
"Geez, I'm so broke now, I can't even afford to pay attention"
=========================================================================
------------------------------
From: "Ger Donners" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux PPP Server
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 21:58:45 +0100
Did you put the mgetty line in your /etc/inittab ?
I've added 8 lines for my RocketPort 8
m1:12345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty tty -n 1 ttyR0
m2:12345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty tty -n 1 ttyR1
m3:12345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty tty -n 1 ttyR2
m4:12345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty tty -n 1 ttyR3
m5:12345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty tty -n 1 ttyR4
m6:12345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty tty -n 1 ttyR5
m7:12345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty tty -n 1 ttyR6
m8:12345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty tty -n 1 ttyR7
I'm dialing out on the first of those modems as well so I use a ppp option
in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ppp0 file like
file /etc/ppp/dialout
This file contains the options I use for dial out.
For dial in I use optionfiles like /etc/ppp/options.ttyR0 to ttyR8. They
contain :
asyncmap 0
lock
192.168.1.1:192.168.1.151
name DialIn
modem
crtscts
auth
-chap
+pap
proxyarp
Of course the IP ....151 is different for each modem. This gives every dial
in a address in the range of
192.168.1.151 to 192.168.1.158. This is probably not the best intallation
there is but it works great for me. Every ppp(0 to 8) has its own options
file in its own ifcfg file. Make shure your pap-secrets file is correct
I hope this will help you.
Ger Donners
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Juergen Heinzl)
Subject: Re: static IP's
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 21:00:11 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Antonio Boveia wrote:
>I have a dial-up provider who doesn't provide static IP addresses,
>and I want one. Is there any way around this? Can I register a
>domain name and then update the IP address each time I dial in,
>or is there some site out there that could act as 'pointer' to mine?
Change your provider
Cheers,
Juergen
--
\ Real name : J�rgen Heinzl \ no flames /
\ EMail Private : [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ send money instead /
\ Phone Private : +44 181-332 0750 \ /
------------------------------
From: "MagnuM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: peer to peer
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 16:02:55 -0500
I'm trying to do a peer to peer network between win98 and linux suse 5.3 .I
have a 3com card in the linux box and a generic network card in win98 box.
Both cards are being seen by each box but I can not do anything between the
two boxes. I have been trying to find some kind of howto or instructions on
how to do this for a week now and can't find anything on it. Anyway, I've
set the linux card ip addy as 192.168.1.1 YasT
and have set in win98 192.168.1.2 for it's ip inthe network control panel
applet . I'm not sure which files in linux to set or how to set win98 so
that the linux box can see it. Can some PLEASE give me some help on how to
set this up. Thanks for anyhelp.
MagnuM
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edmund H. Ramm)
Subject: Re: tn3270 connection??
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 15:34:00 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Michael Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My university uses IBM mainframes for the registration database
> and the library catalog.
> [...]
> Does anyone know how I can connect to these systems?
Install x3270. Of course, above mentioned mainframes need to
have a tn3270 server running. You may need RACF permission in
order to login using the TN3270 protocol instead of SNA.
Eddi
--
email: ehramm AT dk3uz DOT hh DOT provi DOT de | AMPRNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If replying to a Usenet article, please use above email address.
Linux/m68k, the best U**x ever to hit an Atari!
------------------------------
From: Rod Roark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: domain name reg and IP setup
Date: 27 Feb 1999 20:15:23 GMT
PTW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>The InterNIC requires that your server be up continuously
>in order to maintain the name. They do have an actual
>time that the named site can be down before they suspend
>it.
Um, you don't register a "site" with InterNIC. The only machines
you have to identify to them are the name servers, which will
normally be maintained by your ISP... those have to stay up.
-- Rod
======================================================================
Sunset Systems Preconfigured Linux Computers
http://www.sunsetsystems.com/ and Custom Software
======================================================================
------------------------------
From: "M. Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: printing to JetDirect problem
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 21:20:28 -0800
I could be mistaken, but I believe they recently have released a Linux
version.
Mike
(remove the xx)
Dann Church wrote:
>
> Time to Post wrote:
>
> > In comp.os.linux.admin Clarence Wilkerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > : New JetDirects come with built-in LPD spooler and you can
> > : print to them like an ordinary remote printer host.
> > : You still have to arrange for a bootpc or dhcpd server to
> > : provide ip address, routing, etc when the jetdirect printer
> > : first comes on. On some models you
> > : can do this setup from the front LCD panel.
> >
> > : I've heard that the LPD spooler inside is not robust.( Or
> > : you might have the older models without this feature.)
> > : In this case you can talk directly to the printer
> > : at port 9011 (??? from deep memory, might be off ) and handle
> > : the spooling on a linux box. This also makes sense if you're
> > : trying to provide quotas, access control, filters, etc.
> >
> > : I believe that LPRng provided some support for net printers.
> >
> > One correction to this -- in strobe'ing my JetDirect cards they
> > were accepting direct talk on port 9099...
>
> My experience printing to JetDirect cards is that they listen to UDP traffic
> on port 9100. This was from snooping the traffic from a Solaris machine
> running JetAdmin and an hp5x with JetDirect card installed. They might have
> a range that they'll listen on.
>
> As for the BSD (LPD) printing, there internal LPD spooler is still spotty.
> Can't handle more than one request on Port 515 at a time, didn't always
> respond correctly to status checks, etc, etc....
>
> If they'd only port the JetAdmin to Linux.....
>
> --Dann Church
------------------------------
From: JoHn DoH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: @Home setup
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 21:24:16 GMT
Try going to /etc/dhcpc/resolve.conf. There you should see a
nameserver. If you do not then call @home and tell them to tell you
your nameserver IP and add the line 'nameserver x.x.x.x' where x.x.x.x
is you ns' ip. That should be it.
-DoH
Matt Peneguy wrote:
>
> This worked to some extent. I can now ping IP addresses but not names.
> Any suggestions?
>
> Matt
>
> JoHn DoH wrote:
> >
--
JoHn 'DoH' KeLm
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"People are too stupid to realize they are" - DoH
------------------------------
From: "Ger Donners" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: BIG network problem!
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 22:25:28 +0100
Sounds like a DNS problem to me.
You don't tell if you ping a name or a address but if named is not
configured like it should it can slow things down a lot. Is named configured
ok on your linuxbox ?? if commands like netstat and route don't give you all
the info in a split-second mostly named is not setup like it should. Are you
using the c:\windows\host and in case of Samba the c:\windows\lmhost file?
In your case the first might help you out.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7b4nm4$ro9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I wonder if anyone could help me with the following:
>
>Win98 box connected directly (crossover 10BaseT) to Linux box (RedHat5.2,
>2.2.0 kernel). I use IP masquerading to access the internet through the
linux
>box (33.6Kbps modem), which works fine (a bit slow). I've also got some
Samba
>shares going.
>
>However, Samba, FTP, and even HTTP transfers from the Linux box to the
Win98
>box are DOG slow! Win98 to Linux transfers are lightning fast, so it would
>appear to be a one-way problem.
>
>There's an SMC Ultra in the Win98 box and a D-Link (Digital chipset using
>tulip.o from 2.2) under RedHat. The reason I'm getting really frustrated is
>that I can't even receive a smooth shoutcast mp3 stream from the linux box,
>which puts the Linux -> Win98 transfer rate at UNDER 128Kbps. And there
isn't
>even anyone else on the network!!
>
>If anyone has any ideas, I would LOVE to hear them!
>
>cheers
>ben
>
>--
>Ben Ausden
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Ger Donners" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Change machine name??
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 22:33:51 +0100
Leave the loopback (127.0.0.1) like it is!!! Configure the files
/etc/hosts
/etc/HOSTNAME
/etc/sysconfig/network
the others are for named
/etc/named/boot
/var/named/whatever.you.called.your.domain.host.file
the first 3 are simple for the others you might wan't to take a look at the
HOWTO's and "man named".But first of all redefine your loopback or nothing
that uses TCP/IP will work.
Ger Donners
Jack Zhu wrote in message <7b86s7$bb6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Redhat Linux 2.2.1
>
>1. Can I assign IP address "10.1.1.1" to my machine?
>
>2. Can I change the default machine name?
>
> Right now, the prompt is "[root@localhost /root]", I want to change
>"localhost" to "jacklinux", is this a nickname? How to do this?
>
>I tried to change "/etc/HOSTNAME" and "/etc/hosts". But after the update,
>(IP address from 127.0.0.1 to 10.1.1.1 and name changing), during the boot,
>it takes unusual longer time to start the "Sendmail" service.
>
>And when try to start "SMB" service, message is:
>"Use ServerName to set it manually".
>
>Wait for longer time again(10 minutes around), boot is OK. but the name is
>still the old one.
>
>And when I try to "ping 10.1.1.1". Failed.
>
>Any help, please!!!
>
>Thanks in advance!!
>
>Jack
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Leo Stutzmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NEWBIE: Dhcpcd problem.
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 21:05:42 GMT
Hi, I hope someone can point me in the right direction.
I have a local lan with Linux, Win machines, and a Linux IP Masq firewall,
two nics, one connected to a cable modem. I changed the ifup script to add
the proper hostname to dhcpcd to request the ip address from the dhcp
server. Everything is good in cable land. All machines work and can connect,
performance is good.
I have only one nagging problem. Occasionally, dhcpcd tries to renew the ip
address and fails. I get a console message something like "eth1: Setting rx
mode to 0 addresses". This happens about once every two or three days ( at
least when I notice). After this happens an ifconfig shows eth1 set to
0.0.0.0. I assume that it did not renew the lease. Now I should be able to
run ifup eth1, and get everything to work, but this always responds
"failed". I tried ifdown eth1 first and it says no such pid, that's ok, and
then ifup eth1 and it fails. If I reboot the machine it always gets the ip
address.
Can someone enlighted me about what's going on?
Thanks for any help
Leo
------------------------------
From: "Ger Donners" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Configuring DNS with Linux and W95
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 22:42:58 +0100
if your problem is getting nameservices from your Windows pc's you might
want to add the file C:\WINDOWS\HOSTS to your windows PC's
172.16.1.1 pentium.unde.cat
172.16.1.2 petit.unde.cat
Make sure the comma that's in your example isn't there.
Like in Camp Nou there are to many Dutch people in this group, don't you
think :)
Ger Donners
The Netherlands
------------------------------
From: "Corporate Collection Services" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Gateway config help
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:15:24 -0500
I'm trying to configure a linux pc as a gateway for two IP systems, and I'm
having a little trouble putting in the routing statements. The systems have
a 10.x.x.x series IP and a 100.x.x.x series IP addresses. Can anyone help
by posting the proper routing addresses statements to make it work? Thanks
so much.
Stu
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
