Linux-Networking Digest #339, Volume #10 Mon, 1 Mar 99 02:13:36 EST
Contents:
client-connect force DNS request ("Ralf Berlau")
Network Protocols ("information")
collisions on the NICs - news @ 5 ("6876")
Re: PPP Problems (configure-nak/rej ? error) (Brad)
FTP: connection refused ("Bruce W. Mohler")
D-Link DE-220 Support? ("Trevor Frost")
Re: Unable to mount NFS
Re: IP or Erols.com (Ross Vandegrift)
monitoring network (AME)
Re: Restricting Printer Services ("Craig")
Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux (Michel Catudal)
Re: Ethernet for IBM ps/2 386 machine ("Derek Kwan - http://Derek.KWAN.on.ca")
Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux (Michel Catudal)
Re: samba NT mount (Brian Dozier)
Newbie question ("Mel")
Re: Hacker Attack and identd ("Derek Kwan - http://Derek.KWAN.on.ca")
Re: Memorex Telex 1476, 1489 with Linux? ("Martin Ozolins")
Re: PPP Server & Quake2 (Dan Crooks)
Ping return request timed out from Win95 to Linux (Tapas Guha)
Re: problem with ftp (Stephen Loewinsohn)
Re: pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2 (Bill Unruh)
Connetcing to NT RAS with linux ("Kiril Dunn")
RedHat 5.2 and SMC EZ Card 10 PCI (1208T). PLEASE HELP
Re: pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2 (Clifford Kite)
Re: D-Link DE-220 Support? (jim holder)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Ralf Berlau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: client-connect force DNS request
Date: 23 Feb 1999 11:09:57 +0100
Hi all,
my problem is a dns-request from my SuSE 6.0-Linux after any connect like
telnet, ssh or mysql etc.
What is the server looking for and how to stop these requests?
Ralf....
------------------------------
From: "information" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Network Protocols
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 20:28:21 -0700
Can anyone tell me where there is a complete list of networking protocols
where I can get a list of exactly what protocols linux servs?
TIA, dave
------------------------------
From: "6876" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: collisions on the NICs - news @ 5
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 03:34:57 GMT
I upgraded by box from rh 5.1 2.0.35 to 5.2 2.0.36 and I've noticed an
increase in the amount of collisions on both NIC cards - though they are
growing at different rates.
Some observations:
I'm running ipfwadm and this is working correctly. I did try upgrading my
ipportfw to the latest version .37 (per his docs) and had problems during
the patch load where it requested a reverse (-R) load, I agreed and the
patch loaded but it still does not work. I have not rebuilt the kernl so I
really don't suspct that is the problem.
I also noticed that Apache has stopped working even though it's up and
running, it's not processing requests on port 80.
The rest of my configuration is the same as before the upgrade. Those files
over written by the upgrade we're saved off as rpmsave (?) so the rebuild
went without a hitch and the system was back up and running after 1 hr and 1
re-compile to get my NIC cards registered.
Any thoughts?
------------------------------
From: Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP Problems (configure-nak/rej ? error)
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 10:10:39 -0500
Thanks for the help.
All it needed was ipcp-accept-local in the options file. Guess I should
read the man pages once in a while. :)
Brad
------------------------------
From: "Bruce W. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FTP: connection refused
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 03:58:11 GMT
I'm writing a Perl script to benchmark a Compaq server comparing
the performance between Linux and Windows NT. I'm currently
running RedHat Linux 5.2 and wu-ftpd versio 2.4.2b18-2.1 on the
server, but will soon be loading MS Windows NT 4.0 Server..
I'm noticing some interesting behavior on my testing with 4 processes
transferring files to/from the Compaq from a small HP test machine (an
E35). Several times during the test, all connections will start to be
refused. If I restart inetd ("/etc/rc.d/init.d/inet restart"), then the
condition clears.
There are no messages in the syslog (/var/log/messages) that suggests
any problems. I'm not sure what to look at in the ps or netstat output
to point me to the cause of the behavior.
Can anyone suggest some things to look at in the configuration to help
explain what is happening? I'd really like to eliminate this behavior
as
well. I'm trying to demonstrate the Linux will be more robust than
Windows NT.
Bruce
--
Bruce W. Mohler 619-458-2675 (voice)
SAIC/ITS/Server Support 619-535-7806 (fax)
Sr UNIX system administrator 888-781-5697 (pager)
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Trevor Frost" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: D-Link DE-220 Support?
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 03:58:02 GMT
Can someone help me, with this I have a D-Link DE220 ISA, can I get it to
somehow work with Linux? If so, how and what version,
Thankyou
Trevor
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Unable to mount NFS
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 04:05:22 GMT
brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Friends,
: I have 3 machines running Linux all networked together. I am unable to
: mount one of the machines from either of the other two. I have made the
: appropriate modifications to /etc/export. From the machine in question,
: I can mount dirs on the other two and the other two can mount each
: other.
: When I attempt to mount the problem machine I get the following message:
: mounting: RPC: Program not registered
Once you edit /etc/exports:
as root;
killall portmap
killall rpc.mountd
killall rpc.nfsd
Then, as root:
portmap
rpc.mountd
rpc.nfsd
Steve
------------------------------
From: Ross Vandegrift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP or Erols.com
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:14:15 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
zh2 mi2 bu4 hui3 wrote:
>
> > I use erols.com as my ISP. I'm trying to connect via ppp which asks
> > for an IP address. Erols technical support claims not to support
> > Linux and does not know what IP address I should use to connect.
Boy, you must've gotten some pissed off phone op... Erol's is great
about Linux. I've called with win95 problems before, and made passing
comments about Linux, and the phone ops got my jokes! Not to mention,
they often give me advice on using Linux to get around problems with my
other Win95 box. Anyhow, someone else gave you their DNS servers, so
I'll shut up now...
--
Ross Vandegrift | Eric J. Fenderson
ATTENTION: I have **finally** gotten my permit!!!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (AME)
Subject: monitoring network
Date: 1 Mar 1999 04:36:30 GMT
Hi all,
I have a server and a client both running on a cobalt box running Linux.
How can I monitor the activity taking place between the two? Is there a
program for that?
Thanks
--
Ayman Elsaedi
------------------------------
From: "Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Restricting Printer Services
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:53:32 -0600
Hi Samy,
If you're using SAMBA you can go in and specify who you want in with your
Hosts Allow / Hosts Deny files. Simple!
Craig
< [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Samy Zafrany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>Is there any way I can restrict printer services to some of the users?
>We have a brand new (and expensive) HP PostScript printer connected to a
>RedHat 5.1 Linux box.
>We do not want to allow anyone with an account to be able to print. We
>would like to make a small
>list of users that will have this privillege. How can it be done?
>Thanks for any clue!
>Samy
>
------------------------------
From: Michel Catudal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux
Date: 28 Feb 1999 22:59:02 -0600
Jim Esparza wrote:
>
> Have been reading quite a few of the HOWTO's lately trying to get
> Redhat 5.2 installed on my machine. According to the Linux+NT-Loader
> document, standard Linux can't access NTFS.
This is nonsense. When I compile the kernel I have the option to install NTFS support.
I have RedHat 5.2 with kernel 2.2.2 and I can read my NTFS partition without any
problem.
--
Tired of Windows' rebootive multitasking?
then try Linux's preemptive multitasking
http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat/
We have software, food, music, news, search,
history, electronics and genealogy pages.
------------------------------
From: "Derek Kwan - http://Derek.KWAN.on.ca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ethernet for IBM ps/2 386 machine
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 04:36:10 GMT
Eldir Tomassen wrote:
> Who knows what kind of ethernet card would fit in an
> IBM ps/2 386 PC.
> I was just trying to put an MCA card in it but that doesn't really
> fit...
I think MCA card should fit...
Derek
------------------------------
From: Michel Catudal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can NT with NTFS coexist with RedHat Linux
Date: 28 Feb 1999 23:02:06 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Actually the new 2.2.x kernels include support for writing to NTFS partitions
> as well but it is an experimental driver and they warn that it has the
> potential of corupting your NTFS partition.
It is more than having the potential, I have to reinstall NT after my partition
was hozed. I keep NT or read only for now. I use a fat partition to transfer data
back and forth. It is actually my DRDOS partition.
--
Tired of Windows' rebootive multitasking?
then try Linux's preemptive multitasking
http://www.netonecom.net/~bbcat/
We have software, food, music, news, search,
history, electronics and genealogy pages.
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:04:40 -0600
From: Brian Dozier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: samba NT mount
Daniel P Wallace wrote:
>
> I'm trying to mount an NT directory using smbmount and i'm having
> trouble
>
> i'm trying to mount //ot-nt1/users/dwallace to /home/dwallace/h but
> everytime i try i get the entire users directory not the dwallace
> directory.
>
> this is the mount command i'm using
> smbmount //ot-nt1/users/dwallace/ /home/dwallace/h -I <ip> -c
> <clientname> -U <username> -P <password>
>
> everything mounts fine except its not mounting the correct directory.
>
> any help would be great
Well, you would have the same problem using Windows NT, 95, or OS/2.
Unfortuntely, you can't mount a directory, only a file share. In this
case the netbios host is "ot-nt1", the shared resource is "users", so
when you mount the file share you see every directory within the "users"
share. To mount only the dwallace directory, you would need to
reconfigure the NT host "ot-nt1" to share the "dwallace" directory
(perhaps giving it share name "foo"). Then your smbmount command would
be:
smbmount //ot-nt1/foo /home/dwallace/h -I <ip> -c
--
Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable.
------------------------------
From: "Mel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Newbie question
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:49:28 -0500
Interested in building a new machine for running RH on. What hardware
"motherboard, video card, modem" would be the most easiest to find drivers
for and somewhat hassel free? Probably would be using a AMD 233 chip.
Thanks in advance.
------------------------------
From: "Derek Kwan - http://Derek.KWAN.on.ca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Hacker Attack and identd
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 05:11:32 GMT
Well ident is basically other server try to see who u r....
and seems like the hacker is launching an attack FROM your IP/Server and
other sys admin THINKS is you doing the attack...
Derek
Cory Wilson wrote:
> I recently had a hacker attack. One of the things I noticed was that
> durring my attack, I had MANY identd logs in my messages log. What are
> they? How was identd used to attack my machine, and then the many
> networks that were attacked from my machine? (Many unhappy net-admins
> mailed me about this). I saw between 50 and 100 identd logs from
> different hosts, many of them being in Italy. Unfortunately, my system
> was mostly destroyed in the process, but I still have the log files to
> look at.
>
> Any help?
------------------------------
From: "Martin Ozolins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.terminals
Subject: Re: Memorex Telex 1476, 1489 with Linux?
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:17:36 -0800
Won't ever work with LINUX or any ethernet. The equipment you describe is
SNA terminals. They run over Token Ring using a Front End processor to
interface with the main frame.
Martin
Per Gustav Ousdal wrote in message ...
>On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Scott G. Hall wrote:
>
>Sorry for the delay of my reply... Busy U know :)
>
>> Per Gustav Ousdal wrote:
>> > I have a couple of terminals, Memorex Telex 1476 and 1489. I think they
>> > used to be connected to an IBM AS-400.
>> > My question is: Is it a all possible to run any of these terminals
>> > connected to my Linux Box?
>>
>> No, these are not synchronous or asynchronous RS-232 terminals.
>
>Ah, RATS! :( Ok I see, I was araid of that... :/ I didn't have to high
>hopes about the 1476's, I was hopeing there was a way for the 1489 seeing
>the serial port, but I guess not :( Oh well, at least I got a working SVGA
>monitor + nice work out bringing them home ;)
>
>[....]
>> > My 1476's only seems to have some strange network connector. Is this
>> > "thick ethernet"?
>>
>> No, this is IBM's "biaxial" connector, used for their mainframes.
>
>I see. There does seem to be some adaptors for these, looks like they
>"change" the cable into TP (Twisted Pair) could this be correct? (Would
>make sense to use TP cable instead, as the "IBM cabeling" does not seem to
>be very elegant. Or is this "TP" cable also an "IBM-standard"?
>
>> Both of these terminals were forms-based, meaning the host would download
>> a form for each screen, and the terminal was expected to handle user
input
>> and validation. When a form was filled out by the user, the <Send> key
>> would be pressed to send the whole form back to the mainframe (or in some
>> cases, just the answers in a forms-arranged protocol).
>
>I see, so they aren't very useful at all :/ Unless some one is throwing
>away an AS-400. Or some one makes an AS-400 emulator for linux... I've
>heard however that the AS-400 is difficult to emulate b'coz of the HW
>solutions.
>
>> You want a cheap (~ $35) ASCII serial terminal (synch or async; RS423 or
>> RS232, or RS422/RS485). Almost any terminal that was *NOT* connected to
>> an IBM or clone (Amdahl, Sperry/Univac, Wang, etc) will work just fine.
>> In fact, I saw a set of old Data General terminals and Prime Computer
>> terminals the other day that would work just fine (stick them in TVI-925
>> or TVI-950 mode and any UNIX won't have a problem).
>
>I C. Think IBM used to have a pretty big marked share over here in Norway
>though, so it's just so much easier to come by IBM terminals. I think most
>terminals just end up in the trash, doesn't seem to be a marked for them
>over here. However I would love to have a couple connected to my linux
>box.
>
>Any one from Norway know where to get terminals that work with linux?
>
>Regards,
>
>Per
>
------------------------------
From: Dan Crooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP Server & Quake2
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 05:27:51 GMT
Andrew Tatton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a Quake2 dedicated server on my linux machine, it does nothing
> else but run the q2 server and serve samba shares to my local network.
>
> I have attached a 56k modem to the box to allow my mate to dial in so we can
> have a nice fast duel session( with me having a ping advantage of course,
> coz I'm crap)...I'm just a bit bewildered about how to get RedHat 5.1 to
> accept incoming calls and allow the remote machine to connect to the server.
>
> Linux Machine:
> 486 dx4 100
> 16Mb Ram
> No X
> RedHat 5.1 2.0.34
> 56k modem COM1
> 10Mb/s NIC
> IP : 192.168.1.1
> Sub : 255.255.255.0
> DNS Name : andy
>
> Networked to a Win95 Machine
> P133
> 32Mb Ram
> 56k Modem COM2
> 10/100Mb/s NIC
> IP : 192.168.1.2
> Sub : 255.255.255.0
> DNS Name : main
>
> Remote Machine:
> Windows 98
> PII 300
> 128Mb Ram
> 56k Modem COM3
> 10/100 Mb/s NIC
> No assigned IP or DNS name to modem
>
> The remote machine is networked to another machine but I don't care about
> that machine seeing anything, the quake2 server is visable from the P133 so
> I know it's working there.
>
> So how can I get the remote win98 machine to connect to my linux server via
> modem and access the quake2 server at 192.168.1.1:27910 to play against me
> on the P133.
>
> Step-by-Step Idiots Guide if possible
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> Andy Tatton
> http://come.to/clan.mpd
http://www.swcp.com/~jgentry/dialin2.html
------------------------------
From: Tapas Guha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ping return request timed out from Win95 to Linux
Date: 28 Feb 1999 17:07:15 GMT
I am trying to put together one Linux machine and one Windows95 machine
in a same network. In network there is no other node exist. When I try
to ping from either machine to other one it responds with timed out.
When both machine are in linux works fine. Following is the network
details of both machine.
Node 1. Redhat Linux 5.2
IP- 90.33.212.11
Subnet : 255.255.252.0
Node 2. Windows 95
IP - 90.33.212.12
Subnet : 255.255.252.0
Any suggestion & clue is welcome. If anyone can help me by indicating
some documentation about connecting Dos/Windows machine with Linux that
will help. (Ex HOWTO & so on).
Email - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Stephen Loewinsohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: problem with ftp
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:01:49 -0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RH5.2 doesn't install ftpd by default. You have to install wu-ftp.rpm to
get the ftp daemon.
-Steve
PC^God wrote:
> Jacob Hesch wrote:
> > $ ftp localhost
> > Connected to localhost.
> > 421 Service not available, remote server has closed connection
> > ftp>
> >
> > I have checked initd, and it is running ftp. The ftp line is
> > uncommented in /etc/inetd.conf and /etc/hosts.deny is empty. I don't
> > know where to go from here!
>
> have you checked to see if the location for ftpd in inetd.conf exists??
> I had this problem when seting up my RedHat5.0 machine (ftpd not
> installed by default). installing the RPM fixed it right up :-)
>
> -- PC^God --
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Subject: Re: pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2
Date: 1 Mar 1999 05:30:12 GMT
In <7bbqoi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite) writes:
>: Feb 27 22:21:57 film chat[438]: CONNECT
>: Feb 27 22:21:57 film chat[438]: -- got it
>: Feb 27 22:21:57 film chat[438]: send (\d)
>: Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: expect (sername:)
>: Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: 115200^M
>Here is something strange. No ordinary modem can send or receive at
>115200 bit/sec over the usual PPP connection except with help from modem
>compression and error correction. Connecting at that speed, specified by
>the pppd option, very likely means that no error correction or compression
>is configured in the modem itself.
Actually that is the computr to modem speed. It should be high to
account for the modem to modem compression (at 50K modem to modem speed
that can easily give your 100K needed in computer to modem speed.)
------------------------------
From: "Kiril Dunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Connetcing to NT RAS with linux
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 16:30:58 +1100
Dear All,
I'm running the Debian distribution of Linux in our office. I need to
connect to the office of another company running NT Server via a dial-up
line. The other company has set up RAS to accept "any authentication
including clear-text" which according to MS help means PAP. I've set up the
pap-secrets file to contain my user-name password pair. I've been attempting
to connect using the following command line:
pppd ttyS1 115200 connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/chatscripts/otherco"
auth debug lock nodefaultroute noproxyarp modem crtscts require-pap user me
The output of this is at the end of the message, which I hope someone can
make more sense of than I could. The error message at the NT side is
"authentication timout".
Any help on this would be most appreciated.
Kiril Dunn
ZooTech Systems Pty. Ltd.
Mar 1 14:47:52 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0xffff1404> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x0 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth chap 80> <magic 0x1d12> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x0 <auth pap>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0xffff1404> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x1d12> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x1d12> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0
magic=0xffff1404]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="me"
password="mypassword"]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0x1d12]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 ""]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: Remote message:
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth chap 80> <magic 0x2127> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x2 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0xffff80c9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfNak id=0x3 <auth pap>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfRej id=0x2 <auth pap>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x3 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0xffff80c9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x4 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x2127> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x4 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x2127> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP ConfAck id=0x3 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0xffff80c9> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0
magic=0xffff80c9]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: peer refused to authenticate
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x4 "peer refused
to authenticate"]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0x2127]
Mar 1 14:47:53 debian pppd[17799]: rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x4]
------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RedHat 5.2 and SMC EZ Card 10 PCI (1208T). PLEASE HELP
Date: 1 Mar 1999 06:25:13 GMT
I am a new linux user and I can't get this card to work no matter what I
do. I've tried a variety of drivers including the ne2000 pci. I get an
error message at boot saying parameter object not recognized but, I have
checked, double-checked, and triple-checked the configuration and it is
correct. Any suggestions?
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: pppd LCP problem with kernel 2.2
Date: 28 Feb 1999 21:53:29 -0600
Absolutely correct, good point. ATW1s95=45 reports the modem connection
speed and error correction progress. And yes, I looked it up in the manuel
- just as I always have to do. :)
Malware ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hi Clifford,
: you wrote:
: > You connect OK. Both pppd and the ISP are sending, pppd understands
: > the ISP, but either the ISP doesn't get anything pppd sends or doesn't
: > understand what it gets.
: I'd sign that.
: > : Feb 27 22:21:57 film chat[438]: send (\d)
: > : Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: expect (sername:)
: > : Feb 27 22:21:58 film chat[438]: 115200^M
: >
: > Here is something strange. No ordinary modem can send or receive at
: > 115200 bit/sec over the usual PPP connection except with help from modem
: > compression and error correction. Connecting at that speed, specified by
: > the pppd option, very likely means that no error correction or compression
: > is configured in the modem itself.
: Modems can report the speed of the serial line to the PC instead of the
: connect rate. This is configurable by a AT-command - please don't ask me
: which one since I would have to search for the manual.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Governments should be changed like diapers - often and for the
* same reason. */
------------------------------
From: jim holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: D-Link DE-220 Support?
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 01:37:22 -0500
Trevor Frost wrote:
> Can someone help me, with this I have a D-Link DE220 ISA, can I get it to
> somehow work with Linux? If so, how and what version,
>
> Thankyou
>
> Trevor
When a relative's company upgraded, I fell into about 5 D-Link DE220T ISA
cards. They work great with NE2000 support compiled into the kernel. You
might want to try that.
-jim
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
