Linux-Networking Digest #349, Volume #10 Tue, 2 Mar 99 02:14:17 EST
Contents:
Are you new to Linux? Thne read this (childsplay)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
moms message (Ronald Williams)
samba and NT (Paul Miyasaki)
Samba 2 Timestamp problem on RedHat Linux 5.1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ppp problems with rh 5.2 ("Mats Ekelund")
Re: Are you new to Linux? Then read this ("jim")
Re: Kernel Compiling Question ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Appletalk, anyone? (Timo Biesenbach)
Re: Connetcing to NT RAS with linux ("John Hardin")
reverse telnet (David Morgan)
Re: Simple tcp/ip LAN network - problem (childsplay)
Re: Simple tcp/ip LAN network - problem (John Hopkins)
Re: Are you new to Linux? Thne read this (Ted Staberow)
Re: Are you new to Linux? Thne read this ("Diego W.")
Network problem after kernel upgrade (Yunho Jeon)
Re: Simple tcp/ip LAN network - problem (John Hopkins)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: childsplay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Are you new to Linux? Thne read this
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 17:25:28 -0600
Hey there if you rnew to linux like i am, then your going nuts reading
all the linux
web pages on the net looking to get started while pulling your hair out.
Well i think
I have found the most perfect site for the beginner. I mean the real
beginner
this site takes you thru everything step by step will examples and all.
Anyway check it out and good luck to all you linux newbies.
http://rlz.ne.mediaone.net/usr/doc/LDP/install-guide/gs.html
--
Charles "childsplay" VanDyke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.solaris
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 09:16:45 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Tony Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> see, this one is corona, my laptop is zima, my girlfriends box I named
> busch
> (that's a REAL BAD joke)....yep, you guess it, they're all beers.
Since when is zima a beer?!?
While we're on the subject, I'm somewhat amazed to see people name lots
of computers things that could easily be offensive to others. That's
fine for personal machines (as in this case), but it doesn't seem like a
great idea in a corporate environment. The minute you name a computer
baileysirishcream, Murphy's Law dictates that it's going to get assigned
to a new employee who's a recovered alcoholic.
- Logan
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Ronald Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: moms message
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 17:15:47 -0800
Hi Laurie, Give Shannan a big hug for me, I know you'll be glad when her
sleeping
is back on shedule. You guys always were pretty good sleepers too.
Bye the way
Dad found a message you had sent to me on another program but he says
he doesn't
want to go in there yet, so I have to wait. I don't know how long it's
been there, It
looked like a long joke or story, when I can get to it, I'll respond to
it. Laurie, It's fun
to go somewhere, but it's always fun to get back home isn't it. ha
ha Bye the way
Laurie, I'm curious, do you get these e mail's at work or at home.
Hopefully, tomorrow
will be our last day of training. Boy I sure hope so. What two weeks
will Brian be gone?
Oh oh, have to go, bye for now, love MOM XO
------------------------------
From: Paul Miyasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: samba and NT
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 20:14:26 -0500
Hi,
I would like to know if anyone has done the following or can point me in
the right direction. This is the situation. I have a firewall, where i
have split my network into three categories.
1. External which connects to my router.
2. Another network which acts as a separate network for our Web Server
and DNS Server.
3. Another internal network, which uses IP Masquerading via the firewall
to get out.
As you probably have noticed my firewall acts as a quasi router. My
internal network is NT based. What I would like to do if possible is
use Samba to connect my Web Server and DNS to the internal network. I
was wondering if samba does NT trusted domains.
Any help on this matter would be appreciated.
Paul Miyasaki
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Samba 2 Timestamp problem on RedHat Linux 5.1
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 03:02:56 GMT
Hi,
I'm having a problem with file datestamp / timestamp issues with
Samba 2.0 beta 4. I'm using it with the "security=domain" option,
which goes to our PDC, and that all works dandy. The problem is:
- When I map to it from a Windows NT box and create a directory,
the timestamp on the directory is correct (the current time).
- If I then try to "copy" a file to it, the timestamp -should- (at least
I hope it should for compatibility sake) stay the same as it was on the
original file on the NT machine (minus NTFS/FAT/e2fs issues).
It doesn't keep the original time, nor does it use the current time, it
uses the current time MINUS about a half hour?! Check this out:
02/16/99 04:01p <DIR> .
02/16/99 04:01p <DIR> ..
02/16/99 03:27p 176,640 TMP.EXE
3 File(s) 176,640 bytes
47,712,256 bytes free
I assure you TMP.EXE was copied after the directory was created, and
the timestamp on the NT side is like 6 months earlier than that.
I've tried using the "dos filetimes" and "dos filetimes resolution"
stuff
and it doesn't seem to have any effect. I did a basic RTFM, and if there
were solutions mentioned in there other than these two I didn't see
them.
Also I found no reports on usenet of other people having this trouble,
which seems very strange. I know the official version went out, but
without
a mention of this problem in the changelog I hope the only suggestion
isn't
to just "upgrade" :)
We've had to resort to "tar"ing up the directory on the NT side, FTPing
that to the Linux box, and un-tar'ing there. We then just "share" the
directories out. What we would -like- to do, is use the same "robocopy"
tool we used when we had an NT server, which was nice for mirroring
images, but we can't because our files need to keep their datestamps...
Any suggestions??
Thanks and please remove the "Z"s from my email to cc a reply.
Save the lecture if you're a "real email addresses or usenet posts
only" fanatic. I don't need anymore spam than the UCEs I get now! :)
------------------------------
From: "Mats Ekelund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp problems with rh 5.2
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 21:18:15 +0100
Trying to connect to my ISP (telia Sweden) via ISDN and a Zyxel omni.net
ISDN I get the following log:
Mar 1 20:40:21 foo pppd[398]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Mar 1 20:40:23 foo pppd[398]: Serial connection established.
Mar 1 20:40:24 foo pppd[398]: Using interface ppp0
Mar 1 20:40:24 foo pppd[398]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua1
Mar 1 20:40:24 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 20:40:26 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x30 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:26 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x30 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:27 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 20:40:28 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x31 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:28 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x31 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:30 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x32 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:30 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x32 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:30 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 20:40:32 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x33 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:32 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x33 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:33 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 20:40:34 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x34 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:34 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x34 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:36 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x35 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:36 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x35 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:37 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 20:40:38 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x36 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:38 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x36 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:40 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 20:40:40 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x37 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:40 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x37 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:42 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x38 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:42 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x38 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:43 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 20:40:44 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x39 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:44 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x39 <asyncmap 0x0>
<auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
Mar 1 20:40:46 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
<magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Mar 1 20:40:47 foo pppd[398]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Mar 1 20:40:47 foo pppd[398]: Modem hangup
Mar 1 20:40:47 foo pppd[398]: Connection terminated.
Mar 1 20:40:48 foo pppd[398]: Exit.
pppd is started with:
exec /usr/sbin/pppd debug lock modem crtscts /dev/cua1 115200 \
asyncmap 0 escape FF kdebug 0 $LOCAL_IP:$REMOTE_IP \
noipdefault netmask $NETMASK defaultroute connect $DIALER_SCRIPT
where $LOCAL_IP is 0.0.0.0, $REMOTE_IP is 0.0.0.0 and $NETMASK is
255.255.255.0
My options is: name my_isp_user_name
Does anyone have a clue what to do?
Regards,
Mats Ekelund
------------------------------
From: "jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Are you new to Linux? Then read this
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 21:39:39 -0800
childsplay wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hey there if you rnew to linux like i am, then your going nuts reading
>all the linux
>web pages on the net looking to get started while pulling your hair out.
>Well i think
>I have found the most perfect site for the beginner. I mean the real
>beginner
>this site takes you thru everything step by step will examples and all.
>Anyway check it out and good luck to all you linux newbies.
>
>http://rlz.ne.mediaone.net/usr/doc/LDP/install-guide/gs.html
>
>--
>Charles "childsplay" VanDyke
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Note that the original is at http://www.ssc.com/linux/ligs/gs.html
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 15:12:49 +0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kernel Compiling Question
That what I been doing all this time.... its OK
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Toby Field wrote:
> I am relatively new to the world of Linux but I am eager to learn. I
> am trying to setup IP Masquerading on an old 486 machine. I can get
> the machine setup and running with two ethernet cards (one using dhcp
> to get an IP address from my cable modem provider and the other on a
> static 10.x.x.x address) My problem is that the 486 does not have
> enough hard drive space to compile the kernel. Is it possible to
> compile it on my AMD K6-2 300 and then move the zImage file to the 486
> when it is done? How do I take care of modules etc.?? I have tried
> to do what I proposed above and the 486 will boot but I am getting a
> bunch of errors when Linux tries to find module dependencies. I have
> read all the HOWTO's I can find but nobody talks about what I am
> trying to do. Please help me as I am running out of ideas.
>
> Toby Field
>
> PS - I am getting pretty close to throwing the stupid 486 out. I know
> I should just buy a bigger hard drive but that is not possible right
> now.
>
>
------------------------------
From: Timo Biesenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Appletalk, anyone?
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 09:12:45 +0100
Hi,
I have a PowerMac connected to my Linux machine using AppleShare.
It works like this :
- Compile Kernel with Appletalk DDP support (its enabled in the Networking
section)
- Get hold of the netatalk package, compile it, follow instructions given there
(its the usual configure / make / make install procedure)
- There are two config files for netatalk, samples are provided in the package.
Edit them,
its nearly the same as the exports file for nfs
- Start netatalk up, theres a script to do that. You can put it into your
/etc/rc.d/init.d
directory if it works.
- Now you need to configure the Mac. First, set up TCP/IP and make sure
you can access your Linux Box
Now set "Ethernet" in the Appletalk control panel and make sure its activated
- In the Chooser Application you should see the Linux Box when you click
the AppleShare Icon. You will be able to mount drives and printers.
- If the above works, you can switch to AppleShare IP by deactivating Appletalk
on the Mac and typing the IP address of your Linux box in the Chooser.
You can run Samba, netatalk and NFS in parallel even sharing the same
directories.
I did that in order to exchange files between a PC and the Mac via Linux.
-Timo Biesenbach
Aaron Dershem wrote:
> Does anyone have any experience with AppleTalk on Linux? I bought an iMac
> for my girlfriend and would like to connect her to the network. I'm using
> RH 5.2 configured as a server (installation choice).
>
> I notice on boot-up that AppleTalk is started, but can't find any
> documentation on how to configure it. I was having trouble with Samba, but
> read a lot of the manuals and figured it out all by myself (I'm so proud of
> me!), but can't find anything to do with Apple.
>
> Email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED], or post back.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Aaron.
------------------------------
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Connetcing to NT RAS with linux
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:07:32 -0800
Clifford Kite wrote in message <7bec1b$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I'd guess that you need to remove the pppd "auth" option, the company
>NT doesn't seem to want to authenticate itself to you. There are
>some comments below that may help to understand what's going on.
You may want to try the MS-CHAP PPPD available at http://www.replay.com/
It may be able to authenticate the NT system.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
=======================================================================
If you spend any time administering Windows NT, you're far too
familiar with the Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) ...
- "MSDN Flash" email newsletter, 2/9/1999
------------------------------
From: David Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: reverse telnet
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 21:37:43 -0800
I need to be able to go over a TCP/IP network, and establish a
connection to a serial port on another computer to a separate
non-TCP/IP device connected off the serial port. I would like to be
able to assign a name to this serial port, as there really could be
many of them with external equipment to choose from. I need to be
able to do this to talk over the net to the distant machine that is
not net-aware.
Any advice on what techiniques can do this would be welcome. I have
read that this might be called reverse telnet by Cisco.
------------------------------
From: childsplay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Simple tcp/ip LAN network - problem
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 19:09:07 -0600
Well hell, thats my exact problem, i wanna be able to get both machines on the net
with one connection,
problem that i am having is i can't connect to the net is the eth0 is active, and i
can't ping the other
machine if the ppp0 is active. There has to be a way to get both working at the same
time. Not sure how
or where to look but after going thru all the HOWTO's its aggravating the hell out of
me.
Anyone that can help i will be truly gratefull.
Thnx
childsplay
John Hopkins wrote:
> I'm trying to setup a simple tcp/ip LAN with my Win95 and Linux machines
> . On the Win95, I have an ethernet connection for my cable modem, and
> another network card connecting to the linux. I don't care if I can get
> to the net from the linux box, I just want the two machines to be able
> to connect together. Ping doesn't see the other machine from either
> one.
>
> Win95's ip: 10.2.2.3
> Linux's ip: 10.2.2.2
>
> Here is some information I gathered from the Linux machine:
>
> FILE: /proc/net/route
> ---------------------
>
> Iface Destination Gateway Flags RefCnt Use Metric Mask
> MTU Window
> IRTT
> lo 0000007F 00000000 01 0 4 0 000000FF
> 3584 0
> 0
> eth0 0000000A 00000000 01 0 5 0 000000FF
> 1500 0
> 0
>
> OUTPUT OF ifconfig
> ------------------
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:96 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:96 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
>
> eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:C0:A8:35:A0:EF
> inet addr:10.2.2.2 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> Interrupt:3 Base address:0x320
>
> OUTPUT OF netstat -r
> --------------------
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> Iface
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0
> lo
> 10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 1500 0 0
> eth0
>
> I tried shoving the Win95 network card id into ARP on linux, but that
> didn't even help (not sure if it would help anyway).
> Hope someone can help - I've been reading all the relevant HOWTO's and
> trying to get this to work for a long time.
>
> Thanks a million!
>
> John
------------------------------
From: John Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Simple tcp/ip LAN network - problem
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 01:48:10 GMT
Hmm... I will keep that in mind for future, but I don't think I need
routing done here. As I said, I don't care if the private network
between linux and Win95 can see the 'net, even though my second network
card on Win95 can. I just want to be able to connect to things on linux
(eg. webserver development, ftp, etc...).
I've even removed the Internet NIC from Win95 (not physically, via the
control panel) and tried my local network. Still they couldn't ping
each other. So I'm guessing that the second NIC in the Win95 box
doesn't have an effect on the private network (tell me if I'm wrong)?
Thanks,
John
Paul Miyasaki wrote:
>
> So You got 2 NIC in your Win95 machine. I assume this is the case. If so, then are
>they both on the same
> network ie. NIC1 10.2.2.2, NIC2 10.2.2.1. The problem is probably the Win95
>machine. If you have two
> different networks under Win95 this could be a problem because Win95 doesn't do
>routing. There is a
> registery hack for this, but I have tried it but didn't get it to work. The easiest
>thing to do would be to
> buy a cheap 10MB hub and eliminate one of the NIC cards.
>
> Paul
>
> John Hopkins wrote:
>
> > I should also mention that I'm running Red Hat Linux 4.2 and the network
> > card was detected fine. It is an NE2000 compatible card, 10Mbit.
> >
> > John Hopkins wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm trying to setup a simple tcp/ip LAN with my Win95 and Linux machines
> > > . On the Win95, I have an ethernet connection for my cable modem, and
> > > another network card connecting to the linux. I don't care if I can get
> > > to the net from the linux box, I just want the two machines to be able
> > > to connect together. Ping doesn't see the other machine from either
> > > one.
> > >
> > > Win95's ip: 10.2.2.3
> > > Linux's ip: 10.2.2.2
> > >
> > > Here is some information I gathered from the Linux machine:
> > >
> > > FILE: /proc/net/route
> > > ---------------------
> > >
> > > Iface Destination Gateway Flags RefCnt Use Metric Mask
> MTU Window
> > > IRTT
> > > lo 0000007F 00000000 01 0 4 0 000000FF
> 3584 0
> > > 0
> > > eth0 0000000A 00000000 01 0 5 0 000000FF
> 1500 0
> > > 0
> > >
> > > OUTPUT OF ifconfig
> > > ------------------
> > >
> > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> > > inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> > > UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> > > RX packets:96 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > TX packets:96 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > >
> > > eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:C0:A8:35:A0:EF
> > > inet addr:10.2.2.2 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > Interrupt:3 Base address:0x320
> > >
> > > OUTPUT OF netstat -r
> > > --------------------
> > >
> > > Kernel IP routing table
> > > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> > > Iface
> > > 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0
> > > lo
> > > 10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 1500 0 0
> > > eth0
> > >
> > > I tried shoving the Win95 network card id into ARP on linux, but that
> > > didn't even help (not sure if it would help anyway).
> > > Hope someone can help - I've been reading all the relevant HOWTO's and
> > > trying to get this to work for a long time.
> > >
> > > Thanks a million!
> > >
> > > John
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 1999 21:45:01 -0600
From: Ted Staberow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: tstaber@no!spam.ibm.net
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Are you new to Linux? Thne read this
Hi Charles,
I see that the top name on the list is Matt Welsh so that site is
probably first class. He is one of the original experts!
Good call!
--
Ted Staberow
Prairie Networking, Inc.
We Like GNU Ideas.
childsplay wrote:
> Hey there if you rnew to linux like i am, then your going nuts reading
> all the linux
> web pages on the net looking to get started while pulling your hair out.
> Well i think
> I have found the most perfect site for the beginner. I mean the real
> beginner
> this site takes you thru everything step by step will examples and all.
> Anyway check it out and good luck to all you linux newbies.
>
> http://rlz.ne.mediaone.net/usr/doc/LDP/install-guide/gs.html
>
> --
> Charles "childsplay" VanDyke
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Diego W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Are you new to Linux? Thne read this
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 03:00:05 -0300
Great...but if i acces the internet trough a proxy server? what should i do?
Where i configure the ports that linux should connect to the proxy
server??!?!?!
childsplay wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hey there if you rnew to linux like i am, then your going nuts reading
>all the linux
>web pages on the net looking to get started while pulling your hair out.
>Well i think
>I have found the most perfect site for the beginner. I mean the real
>beginner
>this site takes you thru everything step by step will examples and all.
>Anyway check it out and good luck to all you linux newbies.
>
>http://rlz.ne.mediaone.net/usr/doc/LDP/install-guide/gs.html
>
>--
>Charles "childsplay" VanDyke
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yunho Jeon)
Subject: Network problem after kernel upgrade
Date: 2 Mar 1999 06:22:37 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I tried to upgrade kernel to version 2.2 but network does not work with
it. Network worked without any problem with 2.0.x.
My system is redhat 5.1 based and AFAIK I upgraded every rpm's required
for kernel 2.2. After booting with 2.2.2, if I run 'route', it pauses for
about 1 min just before printing default gateway. 'ping' does not work
even for hosts in the same subnet. I tried with various compile options
(but all with SMP enabled) with version 2.2.1, 2.2.2 kernels and obtained
the same result.
Any help would be appreciated.
Detailed information about my system follows:
With kernel 2.2.2
=================
ifconfig results:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:9E:4F:8C
inet addr:147.46.76.222 Bcast:147.46.76.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:161 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:238
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:87
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:9 Base address:0xe880
Boot messages:
Mar 2 14:51:54 csl kernel: eth0: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0xe880,
00:10:4b:9e:4f:8c, IRQ 9
Mar 2 14:51:54 csl kernel: 8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split,
autoselect/Autonegotiate interface.
Mar 2 14:51:54 csl kernel: MII transceiver found at address 24, status
786d.
Mar 2 14:51:54 csl kernel: MII transceiver found at address 0, status
786d.
Mar 2 14:51:54 csl kernel: Enabling bus-master transmits and
whole-frame receives.
With kernel 2.0.35
==================
ifconfig results:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:9E:4F:8C
inet addr:147.46.76.222 Bcast:147.46.76.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:161 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:238
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:87
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:9 Base address:0xe880
Boot messages:
Mar 2 15:21:28 csl kernel: eth0: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0xe880,
00:10:4b:9e:4f:8c, IRQ 9
Mar 2 15:21:28 csl kernel: 8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split,
autoselect/NWay Autonegotiation interface.
Mar 2 15:21:28 csl kernel: Enabling bus-master transmits and
whole-frame receives.
Mar 2 15:21:28 csl kernel: 3c59x.c:v0.99E 5/12/98 Donald Becker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
System
======
Dual Pentium-II 300MHz (Tyan motherboard), 128MB RAM
on board SCSI controller
3 IDE HDD, 1 IDE CD-ROM
1 SCSI HDD, 1 SCSI DAT in external case
3C905B network card connected to 100 Mb network
Network configuration (/etc/sysconfig/network)
=====================
NETWORKING=yes
FORWARD_IPV4="no"
HOSTNAME="csl"
DOMAINNAME=snu.ac.kr
GATEWAY="147.46.76.1"
GATEWAYDEV="eth0"
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NISDOMAIN=""
Interrupts: (/proc/interrupts )
============
0: 123291 timer
1: 2 keyboard
2: 0 cascade
8: 1 + rtc
9: 84294 aic7xxx, eth0 <== is it a problem?
11: 695 aic7xxx
12: 0 PS/2 Mouse
13: 33848 + IPI
14: 7701 + ide0
15: 2031 + ide1
--
Yunho Jeon Tel : +82-2-875-9183
Ph.D. Student, School of Elec. Engr. WWW : http://csl.snu.ac.kr/~yunho
Seoul Nat'l Univ., Korea E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: John Hopkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Simple tcp/ip LAN network - problem
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 02:14:23 GMT
Thanks, Paul. I'll try that out and let you know what happens.
John
Paul Miyasaki wrote:
>
> Check resources on both machines. I noticed that your NIC on Linux machine has an
>IRQ of 3. This is usually
> reserved for a COM port. You might want to try changing the IRQ for your NIC
>
> Paul
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
