Linux-Networking Digest #361, Volume #10 Wed, 3 Mar 99 01:13:45 EST
Contents:
Re: IP forwarding with port mapping (Hans)
Re: Modem problem, help needed... (Allen)
Apache JServ port 8007 problem ("J. David Eisenberg")
Re: Are you new to Linux? Then read this ("Ken says \"I like dsl\"")
apache server config ("Ovidiu Dressler")
PCI, NE2000 problem ("Eriksson")
Re: Linux, Unix, trusts, and NFS (Edwin Lim)
Linux - Samba - Win 98 (Jerry Walter)
Netscape 4.5 installation (CAIS)
routeing problems ("John Shankland")
Re: IP forwarding with port mapping (Greg Weeks)
Re: exim and segv errors on snmp sends (Greg Weeks)
Re: DNS Setup (Intranet w/ Internet Cache) ("Thomas T. Veldhouse")
Re: DNS Setup (Intranet w/ Internet Cache) ("steven ray lane")
Re: HELP: No DNS resolution after using linuxconf in RH5.2 (Kevin Mack)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP forwarding with port mapping
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 21:50:02 +0100
Rick Onanian wrote:
> Hans wrote:
> > It's almost working, to test it I tried a redirection from port 8080 to
> > port 80.
> > Without the ipportfw I get an "unable to connect", but nothing happens with
> > the redirection (I get a "making connection to ...:8080).
>
> You need to make sure that there's a service running on port 80 of the
> end IP address. Also, make sure you chose the right IP - the IP is as
> important as the port.
>
> --
> rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
> ---------------
> My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
> represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
> ---
> Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
> beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
> ---
> Reply to me at either thc <at sign here> psynet <dot> net or
> rick <at sign> mail <dot> artmold <dot> com
Here's what I did to test (I'm on the 192.168.0.1 computer):
ipportfw -C
lynx http://192.168.0.1:80 (work's fine)
ipportfw -A -t 192.168.0.1/8080 -R 192.168.0.1/80
lynx http://192.168.0.1:8080 (seems to hang).
>From the outside, http://195.96.x.y:80 (I have a dynamic IP address) works too,
but http://195.96.x.y:8080 results in an "can not connect".
Thanks for your time.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allen)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Modem problem, help needed...
Date: 3 Mar 1999 05:12:51 GMT
Hello. This may be needlessly picky, but most standard installs of mice put
them on com1, and the modem on com2. Try moving your mouse to com 1, and
disabling your com 2 in the CMOS settings, so that port address will be
available for the modem to grab. Then the sound card can go to it's normal
defaults of IRQ5, and IRQ 7 is still available for a later printer addition if
needed. Check your CMOS settings if you do this, and make sure that whichever
COM port your mouse is on is enabled, and unless you really need 3 serial ports,
that the other standard port is disabled.
On Tue, 02 Mar 1999 13:22:25 +0200, Michael Gleibman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi!
>i'm trying to set-up the modem on linux box and failed up to now...
>Computer configuration: P166/32MB, OS: RedHat 5.2, kernel 2.0.36
>peripherals: mouse on com2, nothing on com1, sb16. no printer.
>Modem: dynamode 33.6 internal isa. The modem has a PnP jumper.
>If i leave it "on", modem catches com3, i can see it both in the bios
>config and in linux when doing setserial -g /dev/ttyS2, it shows uart,
>seems to be ok. Modem catches and irq 4, so conflicting with com1, but i
>have nothing there. I've also tried to change the irq to 5 (using
>setsertial), it changed, but doesn't helped. /proc/ioports and
>/proc/interrupts shaw no conflict. When i enter minicom it hangs for a
>_minute-two_, then tried to display the init string, failed and i forced
>to reset and quit.
>i've also tried to remove the jumper and to manually configure modem on
>com3, no result. Any help will be _greatly_ appreciated!
>(please, CC: to e-mail).
>
> Thanks a lot!
Allen
(email addy; user ID portion has a numeral one in place of word
onespoiler, and of course, delete the bogus secondary domain of nospam.)
fight spam everywhere!!!
The irony is that Bill Gates claims to making a
stable operating system and
Linus Torvalds claims to be trying to take over the world.
Linux; The Official OS of the New Millennium
http://www.linuxlink.com
------------------------------
From: "J. David Eisenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Apache JServ port 8007 problem
Date: 02 Mar 1999 20:01:24 GMT
I've installed the Apache jserv module, but when I try to
access a class like so:
http://localhost/servlets/test
I get the following in my jserv log file:
ajp11: can not connect to host 127.0.0.1:8007
What do I have to change or add to get this port to be
active?
--
J. David Eisenberg http://www.best.com/~nessus
------------------------------
From: "Ken says \"I like dsl\"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: Are you new to Linux? Then read this
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 21:11:31 -0800
shtml allows you to use cgi for a page counter and some other stuff I think.
My ISP requires it for those things.
Snoopy :-)) wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
Yeah They just changed it Today. But all you have to do is click on the
New
link. But to save you some time and to show you what a nice guy I am;
here
is theDIRECT- NEW Link http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/
Actually The follownig is their Home Page. Notice, that at the end it's
not
"html" but "shtml". I don't know why?? I've never seen "shtml" before
http://metalab.unc.edu/metalab.shtml
If you go here you should Click-On---1-Collection Index; 2-Computer
Related;
3--The Linux Documentation Home Page.
Bingo !!!! What you see is--What you get :-)) :-))
Snoopy :-)) :-))
John Sarapata wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
Rufus V. Smith wrote:
I clicked on:
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/ldp.html
and got
404 : FILE NOT FOUND
It works if you use:
http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/
John
------------------------------
From: "Ovidiu Dressler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: apache server config
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 01:56:45 +0200
I'm running an apache server on a linux machine and I don't succeed to make
it parse .shtml files. I have included and <!--exec cmd ="..... .cgi" --> in
that file and I changed the srm.conf file as follows:
AddType text/x-server-parsed-html .shtml
AddType application/x-httpd-cgi .cgi
I also made the same changes into my mime.types file.
I don't know what to do further. Can anyone help me ?
Thank You
------------------------------
From: "Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PCI, NE2000 problem
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 22:04:44 +0100
This is another ethernet card(PCI NE2000, name:SN3200) problem
During boot my card is detected. But is says "blabla (no reset ack!)"
In the ethernet howto is states I shold write something like this:
append "ether=11,0xd100,11,0xbad,eth0"
My card has irq 11 (bios setting) and I get the IO from the failed boot
stuff.
But it doesn't work.
What I'd like to know is, what is that "bad" thingie? Should it just say
"bad" or should I write a real (non used) IO address??
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Edwin Lim)
Subject: Re: Linux, Unix, trusts, and NFS
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 05:03:27 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mark E Drummond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I want our students to be able to mount their home dirs on their Linux
>boxen, but since they control uid's I want to prevent them from
>accessing other peoples dir. Is there any simple way to do this? Can I
>use Kerberos for this? Is there prebuilt kerberos tools (keylogin)
>available? Or is there a better way?
You can use smbmount on the student linux box instead, and export the
directories using samba on your server. This way, each student can
mount his/her own home directory, since he/she will be challenged
every time they mount it.
The disadvantage is that smbmount (requiring smbfs) only runs on linux
the last time I heard, so if the student is running, e.g., freebsd,
everyone is out of luck. Samba (the server) runs on practically any
unix worth running on, and then some.
Cheers,
Edwin Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 973-360-7058 fp b033
------------------------------
From: Jerry Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux - Samba - Win 98
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 14:36:59 -0500
I take it I need to use encrypted passwords for this combination. I have
a WinNT box that I have disabled encrypted passwords, but I forget if
there is such a animal in Win 98 to do the same. Any Advice ?
--
================================================
Jerry Walter
NetSpace Systems Inc.
A Bentley Strategic Affiliate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(937) 332-0053
================================================
------------------------------
From: CAIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Netscape 4.5 installation
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 00:20:47 -0500
I installed netscape 4.5 on redhat 4.2 using the ns-install script.
All files are where they should be. When I try (from an xterm)
> ./netscape & [cr]
bash barfs at me saying that "netscape - no such file ...."
I checked permissions and set them again to 555 for the netscape
executable.
BTW it is in ELF format.
Can anybody please help ?
Thanks
Sergio Montano
------------------------------
From: "John Shankland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: routeing problems
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 21:46:29 -0800
I'm not sure where to look for my problem so I thought I'd post. Heres the
setup. I'm using linux as a router between two networks 192.168.24. and
192.168.25. In the linux box both ethernet cards are host address one i.e.
192.168.24.1 and 192.168.25.1. All other host on both networks are running
flavors of NT. I can ping any host on either network from the linux box.
>From 192.168.25.65 I can ping any host on network 192.168.24.0 except
192.168.24.42 ( the NT server ). I can ping 192.168.24.42 sometimes but not
always and when I can't ping it I can still ping anything else and the linux
box can still ping 192.168.24.42.
Any ideas.
John Shankland
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Weeks)
Subject: Re: IP forwarding with port mapping
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:21:57 -0600
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rick Onanian wrote:
>
>> Hans wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi, i'm new with the IP forwarding thing.
>> > I have 2 computers on my small network, I would like to map incoming
>> > telnet connections on the 192.168.0.1 port 8023 (computer connected to
>> > internet) to the computer 192.168.0.2 port 23.
>> > I've tried everything with ipfwadm with no success at all. Do you have
>> > any suggestions?
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> > Hans.
>>
>> Assuming you have regular IP Masquerading running correctly, and the
>> internal machine can make outgoing connections to the internet, all
>> you then have to do is get your hands on ipportfw, ipautofw, rinetd,
>> or any of the other port-forwarders. I use ipportfw. It can be found
>> at:
>> http://www.monmouth.demon.co.uk/ipsubs/portforwarding.html
> It's almost working, to test it I tried a redirection from port 8080 to
> port 80.
> Without the ipportfw I get an "unable to connect", but nothing happens with
> the redirection (I get a "making connection to ...:8080).
ipportfw requires the packet to go through the masq code to work. This
means it can't be tested from inside the masq firewall. Try using one
of the html syntax checking sites. The one I use is
http://validator.w3.org/
Greg Weeks
--
http://durendal.tzo.com/greg/
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Weeks)
Subject: Re: exim and segv errors on snmp sends
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:24:04 -0600
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Weeks) writes:
> I'm getting these errors every time I try to send an outgoing message
> through exim. I had this working with exim 1.8 on slackware 3.4 with
> kernel 2.0.36. I now have exim 2.12 on slackware 3.6 with kernel
> 2.0.36. I think it's a problem with the dbm setup, but I haven't been
> able to figure out what. Any help would be appreciated.
>
> 1999-03-01 23:04:56 10HhMW-0004nm-00 SEGV while reading "T:mail.geocities.com:20
> 9.1.224.29:10HhMW-0004nm-00" from dbm file: record assumed not to exist
All right, I never did actually find out what the problem was, but
when I wiped gdbm off my machine and built version 1.7.3 from source
it started working.
Greg Weeks
--
http://durendal.tzo.com/greg/
------------------------------
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.install,linux.redhad.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: DNS Setup (Intranet w/ Internet Cache)
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 15:29:50 -0600
Read the HOWTO more carefully. The information is there. I set up an
internal DNS server in my home and it works great. I used nothing except
the HOWTO to do it too.
Tom Veldhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
steven ray lane wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>First of all, sorry for cross posting this. I was not sure which
>newsgroups
>was the correct one.
>
>Here's the situation:
>
>We have 3 segments to our network:
>
>172.16.0.0, 172.20.0.0, 172.21.0.0
>
>We would like to create 2 internal DNS servers for all our internal
>addresses. These DNS servers will have a secondary DNS which points to
>our
>internet gateway.
>
>We have 2 linux boxes (redhat 5.2 - 2.0.36 kernel). Both are setup as
>DHCP
>servers for 2 of our 3 segments (we'll add a 3rd linux box for that
>segment
>in the future).
>
>We have about 100 static IP addresses (servers, routers, hubs,
>workstations). We would like to keep the hosts files on the local DNS
>servers so that all the workstations, etc., don't have to have a copy
>for the
>hosts file.
>
>With that in mind, how do I configure DNS. I was reading the HOWTO's
>for
>DNS (named), but all them show configurations for 'cache only' DNS. We
>need
>to create a private DNS as well.
>
>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>--
>
>Steven Ray Lane
>SeatonCorp
>Chicago,IL
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>remove .nojunk from address when replying
>
>"Sometimes I wake up grumpy.
> Other times I let her sleep."
------------------------------
From: "steven ray lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,linux.redhat.install,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: DNS Setup (Intranet w/ Internet Cache)
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 21:32:21 GMT
I must have missed something then. Where is the HOWTO for this? ( I want to
make sure I was reading the right one)
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote in message ...
>Read the HOWTO more carefully. The information is there. I set up an
>internal DNS server in my home and it works great. I used nothing except
>the HOWTO to do it too.
>
>Tom Veldhouse
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>steven ray lane wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>>First of all, sorry for cross posting this. I was not sure which
>>newsgroups
>>was the correct one.
>>
>>Here's the situation:
>>
>>We have 3 segments to our network:
>>
>>172.16.0.0, 172.20.0.0, 172.21.0.0
>>
>>We would like to create 2 internal DNS servers for all our internal
>>addresses. These DNS servers will have a secondary DNS which points to
>>our
>>internet gateway.
>>
>>We have 2 linux boxes (redhat 5.2 - 2.0.36 kernel). Both are setup as
>>DHCP
>>servers for 2 of our 3 segments (we'll add a 3rd linux box for that
>>segment
>>in the future).
>>
>>We have about 100 static IP addresses (servers, routers, hubs,
>>workstations). We would like to keep the hosts files on the local DNS
>>servers so that all the workstations, etc., don't have to have a copy
>>for the
>>hosts file.
>>
>>With that in mind, how do I configure DNS. I was reading the HOWTO's
>>for
>>DNS (named), but all them show configurations for 'cache only' DNS. We
>>need
>>to create a private DNS as well.
>>
>>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>
>>--
>>
>>Steven Ray Lane
>>SeatonCorp
>>Chicago,IL
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>remove .nojunk from address when replying
>>
>>"Sometimes I wake up grumpy.
>> Other times I let her sleep."
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Mack)
Subject: Re: HELP: No DNS resolution after using linuxconf in RH5.2
Date: 3 Mar 1999 05:54:38 GMT
xcitor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Well, I guess I meant just check it to make sure it was still set to
: what you think it should be. Stopping named should have not stopped
: your name resolution from working, since you are not pointing to
: yourself. What happens when you run nslookup interactively, ie, with
: no arguments? Can you resolve anything? Like this:
: [xcitor@axel xcitor]$ nslookup
: Default Server: localhost
: Address: 127.0.0.1
: > www.linux.org
: Server: localhost
: Address: 127.0.0.1
: Name: www.linux.org
: Address: 198.182.196.56
: >
--
Well, "nslookup" gives:
*** Can't find server name for address 24.64.3.139: Non-existent host/domain
*** Can't find server name for address 24.64.3.140: Non-existent host/domain
*** Default servers are not available
Now I know that these were that machines I was previously using under
Linux as nameservers. I also know that under win95 these two are
currently being used successfully as nameservers. When I try "ping
24.64.3.139", I find that the machine is up and running...so I don't
understand what it means by "default servers are not available".
When I try "dnsquery -n 24.64.3.139 -d ftp.cdrom.com" as a test, I get:
;; res_querydomain(ftp.cdrom.com, <Nil>, 1, 255)
;; res_query(ftp.cdrom.com, 1, 255)
;; res_mkquery(0, ftp.cdrom.com, 1, 255)
;; res_send()
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 58317
;; flags: rd; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; ftp.cdrom.com, type = ANY, class = IN
;; Querying server (# 1) address = 24.64.3.139
;; timeout
;; Querying server (# 1) address = 24.64.3.139
;; timeout
;; Querying server (# 1) address = 24.64.3.139
It appears that although the machine 24.64.3.139 is functional, it
apparently does not want to talk to my machine now.
Any ideas/suggestions?
Kevin
=========================================================================
Kevin Mack
University of Saskatchewan
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: www.engr.usask.ca/~kem400/
=========================================================================
"Geez, I'm so broke now, I can't even afford to pay attention"
=========================================================================
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
