Linux-Networking Digest #417, Volume #10          Sun, 7 Mar 99 20:14:00 EST

Contents:
  cnet pro-120 NIC ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: Windows98 Networking (Jason Kircher)
  Re: simple routing question ("Dr. Yuan Liu")
  How to compile Kernel 2.2.2  with redhat 5.2??? ("Aaron Saikovski")
  Using Linux as a router with NAT? (Adam Wilkins)
  Re: NT users authentication using linux pswd file. (Brian McCauley)
  Re: PPP problem with diald (stracgs)
  Compile 2.2.2 problem ("John McSwain")
  Need guidance ("Hamster")
  Sparc2 with 2nd ethernet adapter ?? (Steve Scott)
  Re: IP source code! (Brian McCauley)
  Re: WIN98 RAS TELNET LINUX ?? ("Tim Gibson")
  Re: SLow Dialin (Clifford Kite)
  How do I populate an ldap directory with e-mail addresses? ("Tim Gibson")
  IP Masquerading and iPhone ("A J Wilson")
  "who" not working (Christopher E. Bennett)
  Re: moms message ("Ron")
  Re: ppp problems with rh 5.2 ("Ron")
  Compex RL100ATX (Roman Dirgelas)
  ewrk3 network driver doesn't work as module (Robert Moniot)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cnet pro-120 NIC
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 19:16:47 GMT

Hi everyone. I'm trying to get a CNet PRO-120 Fast Ethernet card to work with
my Linux system but (guess what), I'm not having much luck. The card did not
come with any documentation worth the name and so I've had to proceed mostly
by experimentation. I know that the card is installed correctly and that it
works because it works fine under Win95. When I installed linux I tried to
use the card with the NE2000 module but it refused to be detected. After
perusing the Ethernet HOWTO, I tried using the Tulip module, and this time it
did get detected as a "Macronix 98713". Unfortunately, even though the card
has been recognized I cannot get it to work. When I ping my own machine, it
works, but when I ping the other machine(Win98) the packets don't get
through(When I ping the linux machine from the Win98 machine they don't get
through either). I tried doing a "cat /proc/pci" and the card is reported as
"Unknown vendor MX98715 / MX98725 (rev 32)" which is slightly different to
that reported by the Tulip module and I don't know whether this has anything
to do with the problem.I also noticed that a "cat /proc/net/dev" reports a
non-zero number in the "Carrier" column. I don't know what this means but I'm
mentioning it just in case it is important. I also tried playing around with
ifconfig and route but to no avail. My network consists of two computers one
Win98 one linux connected by a crossover cable (no hub). Please, has anyone
managed to get this type of card to work with Linux?? How?? If possible
please send any answers to my mail account as well as the newsgroup as my
ISP's NNTP server seems to be a bit shakey on it's legs. Thanks.

Etienne

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: Jason Kircher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Windows98 Networking
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 16:29:20 GMT

    Check out the Samba package.  Visit www.linux.org and do some
searching.  (I forget precisely where the latest Samba is, anyone?)

Phil Williams wrote:

> I'm involved in a LAN at work, all independently running Windows98 (no
> server, all stand-alones).
> How can I run my system using redhat linux 5.2 on the network to share
> printers etc.
> I have the same network card has the others in the network

--
                                        -Jason Kircher
                                        [EMAIL PROTECTED]




------------------------------

From: "Dr. Yuan Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: simple routing question
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 16:07:43 -0500

You'll need three things to make it work:

On nt4s: use 10.64.0.1 as gateway to network 10.64.0.0/255.255.255.0
(the netmask is my guess to your subneting plan);
On nt4w: use 10.32.0.1 as gateway to network 10.32.0.0;
On Linux: a little tricky.  The routing table is trivial:
  route add -net 10.32.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0;
  route add -net 10.64.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth1
Ultimately, when you initially configured your NIC the setup program has
probably done this for you.  Type "route -n" you should see something
like:
---
10.32.0.0   *               255.255.255.0   U     1500   0      502 eth0
10.64.0.0   *               255.255.255.0   U     1500   0      502 eth1
loopback    *               255.0.0.0       U     3584   0      691 lo
---
But you MUST have kernel IP packet forwarding enabled, AND run something
like gated. (I don't know why the latter but it works that way.)  The
tricky part is that any sensible Linux distribution must have IP
forwarding disabled by default in compliance with standard.  You need to
compile the kernel yourself, or ask someone to do it for you and install
the new kernel.  Running gated is trivial but most likely you need to
compile it.  Most Linux distributions come with routed.  It also works,
but it is said to screw up the PPP interface (I experienced this
myself), which you intend to have for your Linux.

Hope this helps.  Good luck.

-- 
+--- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------- http://www.ChiTech.ca/ ---+
|         Dr. Yuan LIU           -     Chitech Technologies Inc.  |
+------- (514)281-0494 ------------------ FAX (514)281-0493 ------+

Tina and Dean wrote:
>     i have 3 boxes, 1 nt4.0 server, 1 nt4.0 wstn and 1 linux box.  The
>
> NIC's at 10.32.0.1 and 10.64.0.1.  from the wstn (10.32.0.2) i can ping
> 10.32.0.1 and 10.64.0.1 but not 10.64.0.2.  The same from the ntserv; i
> can ping 10.64.0.1 and 10.32.0.1 but not 10.32.0.2.  What sort of
> 
> 10.32.0.2 (ntwstn)-------| 10.32.0.1 eth0 // linux box // 10.64.0.1 eth1
> |---------10.64.0.2 (ntserv)
>

------------------------------

From: "Aaron Saikovski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: How to compile Kernel 2.2.2  with redhat 5.2???
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:07:22 +1100

Please Help!!
I have followed the how-to's to the letter, I have used the Linus
pocketbook.
I cannot get the 2.2.2 kernel to work correctly under RedHat 5.2.

I compiled the kernel, removed static links to linux, I have made the
modules, made the modules_install.
I have moved the zImage to /boot.
When I reboot and try to boot the new kernel, it causes a total system
reboot..
In the /boot directory there is still initrd etc files...

Is there an updated version of the kernel how-to that focuses primarily on
redhat5.2 and the latest kernel build?
I have followed the how-to to the letter and it doesn't workj with redhat
5.2
Please help!!

Thanks!

Aaron
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: Adam Wilkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Using Linux as a router with NAT?
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 16:43:40 GMT

I have a Linux box networked with a Win95 box.  I have one 56K modem.  I
would like to connect directly to the internet with my Linux box.  On
occasion, I would also like to connect with my Win95 machine as well.
Does anyone know of an application for Linux that will allow my Win95
machine to connect to the internet through the Linux box?   I will need
NAT to keep my private 10.0.0.0 network from the internet.  I found two
applications for my Win95 box called IP Connect and WinRoute.  I really
don't want to spend any money on these products unless absolutely
necessary.  Please email me or reply to this message.....

Thanks,
Adam Wilkins
Dallas, TX


------------------------------

From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NT users authentication using linux pswd file.
Date: 07 Mar 1999 14:27:34 +0000

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> hi,
> 
> I'm using samba on my redhat 5.2 for file sharing. I don't know what shoud I
> do for pswd sharing. may help me?

I think you'll need a very recent Samba.  I doubt any distribution
will be shipping with a version of Samba that'll act (reliabvly) as a
domain controller.

-- 
     \\   ( )  No male bovine  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .  _\\__[oo   faeces from    | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
 .__/  \\ /\@  /~)  /~[   /\/[ |   +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
 .  l___\\    /~~) /~~[  /   [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
  # ll  l\\  ~~~~ ~   ~ ~    ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
 ###LL  LL\\ (Brian McCauley)  |

------------------------------

From: stracgs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: PPP problem with diald
Date: 07 Mar 1999 08:47:25 PST

Thanks for the try... I 'think' I got past that one...
I downloaded the 0.16.4-1.RPM ...
This seems to have installed 'better' than the 0.16.5 version...

Glen Parker wrote:

> There is no module ppp0.  Either fix your diald config setup, or
> alias for ppp0 in /etc/conf/modules, like this:
> alias ppp0 ppp

modprobe -c | grep -i ppp
alias ppp0 ppp
alias ppp1 ppp
alias tty-ldisc-3 ppp

So...

Mar  7 09:14:13  diald[1120]: Running pppd (pid = 1138).
Mar  7 09:14:13  pppd[1138]: pppd 2.2.0 started by root,uid 0
Mar  7 09:14:13  pppd[1138]: Using interface ppp0
Mar  7 09:14:13  pppd[1138]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua1


NOW, the NEW problem... I need a 'dynamic IP' and am not getting the
ISP to configure my end.  Reading the diald-faq.txt in section 6.11,
almost sounds like 'dynamic' is NOT really supported. I started the
diald connection with a 'nslookup', which is a UDP request. But, the
ISP is still trying to Config (change IP) for me.

Mar  7 09:14:43  pppd[1138]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Mar  7 09:14:43  pppd[1138]: Connection terminated.
Mar  7 09:14:43  pppd[1138]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean:
Mar  7 09:14:43  pppd[1138]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
Mar  7 09:14:43  pppd[1138]: Exit.

I need to know how to get pppd to handle the 'LCP Config-Requests'.




------------------------------

From: "John McSwain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Compile 2.2.2 problem
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 11:50:35 -0500

I am trying to get support for 16750 UART serial port (for ISDN) via
upgrading to Kernel 2.2.2.  After configuring the kernel, make dep, make
clean, I do make bzImage.  After 20+ minutes I receive this info:

ld -m elf_i386 -T /usr/src/linux-2.2.2/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds -e stext
arch/i386/
kernel/head.o arch/i386/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \
        --start-group \
        arch/i386/kernel/kernel.o arch/i386/mm/mm.o kernel/kernel.o mm/mm.o
fs/f
s.o ipc/ipc.o \
        fs/filesystems.a \
        net/network.a \
        drivers/block/block.a drivers/char/char.a drivers/misc/misc.a
drivers/ne
t/net.a drivers/cdrom/cdrom.a drivers/pci/pci.a drivers/video/video.a \
        /usr/src/linux-2.2.2/arch/i386/lib/lib.a
/usr/src/linux-2.2.2/lib/lib.a
/usr/src/linux-2.2.2/arch/i386/lib/lib.a \
        --end-group \
        -o vmlinux
nm vmlinux | grep -v '\(compiled\)\|\(\.o$\)\|\( [aU]
\)\|\(\.\.ng$\)\|\(LASH[RL
]DI\)' | sort > System.map
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.2/arch/i386/boot'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.2.2/include -E -D__BIG_KERNEL__ -traditi
onal
 -DSVGA_MODE=NORMAL_VGA  bootsect.S -o bbootsect.s
as86 -0 -a -o bbootsect.o bbootsect.s
make[1]: as86: Command not found
make[1]: *** [bbootsect.o] Error 127
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.2.2/arch/i386/boot'
make: *** [bzImage] Error 2
[root@firewall linux]#


I have found that the as86 is the GNU x86 compiler.  I am running gcc
2.7.2.3.  But now what?  Any ideas as to the problem and can I recover from
here or do I need to delete all these files and go back to extracting the
tar file?  I have updated Packages as per RH 5.2 upgrade suggestions.

Any suggestions appreciated.

John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: "Hamster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Need guidance
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 14:15:36 -0800

I'm working on my degree on Computer Information Systems but also work full
time doing cable jobs (fiber optics, cat 5 as such) I'm thinking of starting
my own business upon graduation and that would be on netwroking as far as
cabling and setting up servers, fddi, ethernet.. Mainly hardware and
software.. I am looking for guidance for feasability on the subject.. Or a
mentor at that.. I am prior service and I have buddies still in the service
about to leave and they all do computers in their field. I am young and
motivated and willing to give this an honest to goodness try.. I just need
the right direction... Thanks.. Pls e-mail me [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Joey sends




------------------------------

From: Steve Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Sparc2 with 2nd ethernet adapter ??
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 15:01:52 -0500

Hi all,
I have a Sparc2 with a Redhat4.1 installation (kernal 2.0.27)
I installed a Sun 501-1450 Sbus card as a 2nd ethernet interface.
at boottime, the prom (ver 2) recognizes it, and so does the kernel,
eth0, eth1....although same mac address, heard this was ok tho'.
Eth0 (onboard) works fine.
Can not get eth1 to work

I know how to set up an interface,networks,  static routing, etc.
Anyone tried this with the 501-1450 ?    Any hardware related tips I
missed?

--
Steve Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.tiac.net/users/scotty



------------------------------

From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP source code!
Date: 07 Mar 1999 14:21:16 +0000

Kishore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>  Can you please point me to a place where I can look at IP module source 
> code.

For reasons I've never bothered to understood Linux's IP stack cannot
be compiled as a module.

I suspect that this is one of those cases where "if you need to ask
the answer ain't gonna help you much".

/usr/src/linux/net/ipv4/

> I have to hack into that and make some changes in it ie., find the 
> router alert option in it.

Hmmm... if you are using a routing daemon you probably want to get the
source for that too.

-- 
     \\   ( )  No male bovine  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .  _\\__[oo   faeces from    | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
 .__/  \\ /\@  /~)  /~[   /\/[ |   +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
 .  l___\\    /~~) /~~[  /   [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
  # ll  l\\  ~~~~ ~   ~ ~    ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
 ###LL  LL\\ (Brian McCauley)  |

------------------------------

From: "Tim Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: WIN98 RAS TELNET LINUX ??
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 10:41:34 -0800

I don't think Win98 can route TCP/IP from it's Dial-Up adapter to the
network.  Why don't you set up a PPP server on your Linux machine?  Check
out the HOWTO's at metalab.unc.edu/linux

Super C5 wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I'm having problems dialing in to my network and being able to access my
linux
>server.  I have 3 computers on the network I'm dialing into.  2 WIN98
machines
>one of wich is running RAS (that's how I dial in) the other is just
networked
>in but doesn't do anything special.  The linux server serves as an
>intranet/ftp/telnet/samba  server.  It works fine with the two WIN98
computers,
>but when I dial in I can't see the linux server at all.  Not in any of the
>services.  It's like the TCP/IP is disabled or something, but I told my
machine
>I'm dialing in on to use TCP/IP (also a WIN98 machine)....please help I've
read
>every readme file I can find and can't find anything of use.  I've been
trying
>to get this to work for over a month. I really need to be able to see it
like
>if I were actually on the network.  PLEASE HLEP!!!
>Thanks,
> Daniel



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: SLow Dialin
Date: 7 Mar 1999 12:33:49 -0600

angelo genovese ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

: I just setup a linux box at home. It's a little shaky right now, but my
: biggest problem is connecting to the internet. My school acts as an ISP,
: when I run a ppp-on supplied by a proffesser the modem dosn't even dial
: out. if I use minicom to try and connect, it connects, but the "welcome"
: script runs incredibly slowly.

: I've got a p75 with a 33.6 cardinal modem.

Sounds like the IRQ configured for Linux is not the IRQ that the modem
actually uses.  This configuration is done with the setserial command
in one of the boot-up /etc/rc.* files.  You'll need to find which
IRQ the modem uses, and change it in the setserial boot-up command.
"man setserial".

--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                       Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
 * It _has_ to be */

------------------------------

From: "Tim Gibson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How do I populate an ldap directory with e-mail addresses?
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 10:52:23 -0800

I have installed OpenLDAP from rage.net on my RedHat 5.2 server and would
LOVE to use it as a company-wide e-mail address directory so everyone
doesn't have to remember everyone's e-mail address.  How would I go about
doing this?  The rage.net HOWTO doesn't explain this in detail.  I am
somewhat of a newbie so basic help is really what I need.  Thanks.

Please cc me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]



------------------------------

From: "A J Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP Masquerading and iPhone
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 05:54:56 +1100

Hi

I am trying to get iphone to work on my Win95 box through a linux box
(running IP Masquerading) connected to the Internet.  I am using Redhat 5.1
upgraded to kernel 2.0.36-3 and have installed ipautofw.  The settings I am
using are

ipautofw -A -r udp 22555 22555

This setup allows me to dial out and talk and exchange video with someone.
However, I am not contactable by anyone on the other side of my linux box.
Could someone please assist by letting me know what settings are required to
allow someone on the internet to get through my linux box to contact me on
my Win95 machine.

Thanks
Austin



------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher E. Bennett)
Subject: "who" not working
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 99 19:20:56 GMT

I can't figure out what I did to my configuration that caused this, but my 
"who" command is not working.  It fails to display who is logged on.  "w" 
fails too.  I remember it working at one point, but it doesn't work now.

I'm re-installing a newer version of Linux tonight, but I really would like to 
understand WHY this doesn't work right now before I do that.

Everything else works fine (including www server, ftp server, samba..etc).

TIA for any ideas/explanations of what might be going on.


Chris Bennett (http://www.mcs.net/~bennettc/)

"If, in reading this, you are uncertain as to whether a specific statement
is meant seriously or not, simply apply this rule of thumb: If the statement
makes you consider filing a lawsuit, I was kidding.  Ha ha!" - Dave Barry

------------------------------

From: "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: moms message
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 22:07:27 +0100
Reply-To: "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

????????????????????????????????
Ronald Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>Hi Laurie, Give Shannan a big hug for me, I know you'll be glad when her
>sleeping
>is  back on shedule.  You guys always were pretty good sleepers too.
>Bye the way
>Dad found a message you had sent to me on another  program but he says
>he doesn't
>want to go in there yet, so I have to wait.  I don't know how long it's
>been there, It
>looked like a long joke or story, when I can get to it, I'll respond to
>it.  Laurie, It's fun
>to go somewhere, but it's always fun  to get back home isn't it.  ha
>ha     Bye the way
>Laurie, I'm curious, do you get these e mail's at work or at home.
>Hopefully, tomorrow
>will be our last day of training.  Boy I sure hope so.  What two weeks
>will Brian be gone?
>Oh oh, have to go, bye for now,    love      MOM   XO
>



------------------------------

From: "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ppp problems with rh 5.2
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 22:10:20 +0100
Reply-To: "Ron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Looks to me like you got ISDN an modem config mixed up...
Mats Ekelund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>Trying to connect to my ISP (telia Sweden) via ISDN and a Zyxel omni.net
>ISDN I get the following log:
>
>Mar  1 20:40:21 foo pppd[398]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
>Mar  1 20:40:23 foo pppd[398]: Serial connection established.
>Mar  1 20:40:24 foo pppd[398]: Using interface ppp0
>Mar  1 20:40:24 foo pppd[398]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua1
>Mar  1 20:40:24 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>Mar  1 20:40:26 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x30 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:26 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x30 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:27 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>Mar  1 20:40:28 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x31 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:28 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x31 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:30 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x32 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:30 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x32 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:30 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>Mar  1 20:40:32 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x33 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:32 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x33 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:33 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>Mar  1 20:40:34 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x34 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:34 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x34 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:36 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x35 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:36 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x35 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:37 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>Mar  1 20:40:38 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x36 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:38 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x36 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:40 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>Mar  1 20:40:40 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x37 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:40 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x37 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:42 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x38 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:42 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x38 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:43 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>Mar  1 20:40:44 foo pppd[398]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x39 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:44 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfAck id=0x39 <asyncmap 0x0>
><auth pap> <magic 0x4e9e2cf7>]
>Mar  1 20:40:46 foo pppd[398]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap 0x0>
><magic 0x6a7db57b> <pcomp> <accomp>]
>Mar  1 20:40:47 foo pppd[398]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
>Mar  1 20:40:47 foo pppd[398]: Modem hangup
>Mar  1 20:40:47 foo pppd[398]: Connection terminated.
>Mar  1 20:40:48 foo pppd[398]: Exit.
>
>pppd is started with:
>
>exec /usr/sbin/pppd debug lock modem crtscts /dev/cua1 115200 \
> asyncmap 0 escape FF kdebug 0 $LOCAL_IP:$REMOTE_IP \
> noipdefault netmask $NETMASK defaultroute connect $DIALER_SCRIPT
>
>where $LOCAL_IP is 0.0.0.0, $REMOTE_IP is 0.0.0.0 and  $NETMASK is
>255.255.255.0
>
>My options is: name my_isp_user_name
>
>Does anyone have a clue what to do?
>
>Regards,
>Mats Ekelund
>
>
>



------------------------------

Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 20:06:36 +0100
From: Roman Dirgelas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Compex RL100ATX

Hi,

is anyone working with a Compex RL100ATX/PCI 100MBit card?

Any ideas how to install that bloody cheap thing?

R.



------------------------------

Subject: ewrk3 network driver doesn't work as module
From: Robert Moniot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 22:40:57 GMT

Hi.

I am using RedHat 5.2 with a 2.0.36-3 kernel, on a machine with a
DEC Etherworks 3 network card (DE205-AC).  When I use a kernel with
the ewrk3 driver built-in, it works fine.  It automatically uses I/O
address 0x300, IRQ 11.  When I use a kernel with a modular driver, it
fails, giving messages like:
  eth0: transmit timed/locked out, status 002d, resetting.

Do I need to define some special parameters in /etc/conf.modules to
get this module to work?

Thanks for any advice,

-- 

Bob Moniot
Fordham University                  email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fordham College at Lincoln Center   URL:    http://www.dsm.fordham.edu/~moniot/
New York, NY  10023                 phone:  (212) 636-6311

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to