Linux-Networking Digest #428, Volume #10 Mon, 8 Mar 99 23:14:02 EST
Contents:
ZyXEL Omni TA128 (Chiyu Wang)
Re: dns problems (or name lookups) (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: Why the Bottleneck? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (Greg Andrews)
RMT and Solaris 7.0 (Cris Collins)
Re: Multilink & Networking Help ("Eugene")
DHCP and NDS ("Miles Elam")
isdn compile error - help ("barazani")
Re: SYN flooding... (Rick Onanian)
Multiple Network Card Problem (Ty Lamb)
Re: Tone activated Tel Exchanges ("Graham Shepherd")
Route problem (Dan)
smbmount vs Win98 network neightboor ("J�r�me Tollet")
Re: RedHat 5.2: telnet and ftp problem (Keith Tucker)
NE2000 compatible, pnp network card problems (Peter Blazso)
Re: How to compile Kernel 2.2.2 with redhat 5.2??? ("Cronin B. Vining")
Re: Logging into Samba from Windoze 98 (W.D. Allen)
terminal problem with SCO (from linux) (Ed Weinberg)
Ethernet Chipset in Toshiba Notedock III? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Printing ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: DHCP and resolv.conf (Ian Cottrell)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Chiyu Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: ZyXEL Omni TA128
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 14:13:37 -0600
Hello,
When I use Windows 95 & NT Dialup Netwoking to dial out to a remote
access server through ZyXEL Omni TA128, it works well. However, for the
same PC/TA/line/switch interface, I can not make a call under Linux
Minicom or Windows HyperTerminal. (My goal is to make calls by pppd,
since 48 these TAs are controlled via Cyclades serial extender.) Below
are screen captures for both environments.
========== screen capture for HyperTerminal =============
at
OK
at&fb40&j3
OK
atdi50122
CONNECT 115200/PPP 64000/NONE
~ }#�!}!}-} }4}"}&} } } } }#}$�#}%}&.��}!�'~ }#�!}!}.} }4}"}&} } }
}}#}$�#}%}&.
��}!v�~ }#�!}!}/} }4}"}&} } } } }#}$�#}%}&.��}!?})~ }#�!}!}0} }4}"}&} }}
} }#}$
�#}%}&.��}!�/~ }#�!}!}1} }4}"}&} } } } }#}$�#}%}&.��}!��~
}#�!}!}2}}4}"}&} } }
} }#}$�#}%}&.��}!u}!~ }#�!}!}3} }4}"}&} } } }
}#}$�#}%}&.��}!<�~}#�!}!}4} }4}"}
&} } } } }#}$�#}%}&.��}!�r~ }#�!}!}5} }4}"}&} } } }
}#}$�#}%}&.��}!��~}#�!}!}6}
}4}"}&} } } } }#}$�#}%}&.��}!s\~ }#�!}!}7} }4}"}&} } }
}}#}$�#}%}&.��}!:�~
NO CARRIER
========== screen capture for Linux =============
[root@LAB-linux root]#minicom ttyC48
Welcome to minicom 1.82
OPTIONS: History Buffer, F-key Macros, Search History Buffer, I18n
Compiled on Oct 1 1998, 23:34:55.
Press CTRL-A Z for help on special keys
ATZ B40
OK
atdi50122
CONNECT 115200/PPP 64000/NONE
NO CARRIER
(<== it hangs there)
=========================
Can anyone please tell how I can troubleshooot these and how I can get
rid of these junk characters for HyperTerminal and make a connection
established?
Thanks,
Chiyu Wang
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: dns problems (or name lookups)
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:51:33 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you setup the file /etc/hosts? See NET-3-HOWTO
MazterVIP wrote:
>
> Hi...
> i got some problems, i am running a network at home with 4 computers,
> and the network works in linux (i can ping) but i can't ping the
> computername like MazterVIP.MazterVIP and Server.MazterVIP....i think
> the problem is with the dns, but i dont know...
> plz help me..
>
> //MazterVIP
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why the Bottleneck?
Date: 08 Mar 1999 20:57:22 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jerry Gardner) wrote:
>
> > I have a machine that dual-boots Linux 2.0.36 and FreeBSD 3.1. This
> > machine is connected to another machine running WinNT 4.0 on an
> > isolated ethernet. Both machines have 3Com 3C905B NICs.
>
> > When I transfer large (~100MB) files between the FreeBSD box and the
> > NT box, the throughput averages 1000-1100 KB/sec. When I reboot into
> > Linux and FTP the same size files, the throughput drops to 600-700
> > KB/sec. This is on an isolated 10BaseT ethernet with *no* other
> > traffic.
>
> > Why is Linux network performance so much less (30-40%) than FreeBSD
> > performance in this case? Where is the bottleneck? Is there some
> > tuning I need to do to fix this?
>
> The "tuning" you'd need to do is to throw away the Linux networking code and
> replace it with 4.4BSD-Lite(2) or some variant. Sorry, but Linux simply
> wasn't designed to handle high amounts of network traffic. I've run into the
> same problem more times than I can count, and the problem you describe is
> *precisely* the type of problem that forces large internet sites like Yahoo!
> and XOOM.com to use FreeBSD rather than Linux.
also might want to check out the 2.2 kernels - IIRC, networking was one of
the bits overhauled.
--
Frank Sweetser rasmusin at wpi.edu fsweetser at blee.net | PGP key available
paramount.ind.wpi.edu RedHat 5.2 kernel 2.2.1 i586 | at public servers
If you want to be a hacker, keep reading. If you want to be a cracker,
go read the alt.2600 newsgroup and get ready to do five to ten in the
slammer after finding out you aren't as smart as you think you are.
And that's all I'm going to say about crackers.
- _How To Become a Hacker FAQ_, by Eric S. Raymond
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Andrews)
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.solaris
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: 8 Mar 1999 13:40:02 -0800
Juergen Nickelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve Bellenot) writes:
>
>> Some i've seen that haven't been mentioned yet (i think):
>
>I am jumping late into this thread, but perhaps these have not yet
>been mentioned: We are using painters (with german/european bias, of
>course). Up to now we have
>
> nolde, marc, degas, davinci, escher, picasso, dali, dix, busch,
> monet.
>
>I haven't yet been able to come up with an appropriate name for the
>printer -- it should perferrably be a graphic artist who worked mostly
>in black and white (and escher is already in use).
>
Mondrian (apologies if the spelling was wrong) used mostly
white and black in his earlier works, though there were three
squares of red, yellow, and blue.
-Greg
------------------------------
From: Cris Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RMT and Solaris 7.0
Date: 8 Mar 1999 22:34:09 GMT
Does anyone know of a new version of rmt to work with Linux. I have
been Dumping to a Linux box from a Solaris 2.5 x86 machine, but have
recently upgraded to SOlaris 7.0 running on a sparc. I am running
the rmt that comes with Slackware 3.6.
ufsdump 0nufbds netman:/dev/st0 512 54000 13000 /opt
DUMP: Writing 256 Kilobyte records
DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Mon Mar 08 17:19:32 1999
DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch
DUMP: Dumping /dev/rdsk/c0t3d0s5 (dsr-gw:/opt) to netman:/dev/st0.
DUMP: Mapping (Pass I) [regular files]
DUMP: Mapping (Pass II) [directories]
DUMP: Estimated 17532 blocks (8.56MB) on 0.00 tapes.
DUMP: rmtstatus: expected response size 24, got 28
DUMP: This means the remote rmt daemon is not compatible.
DUMP: Lost connection to remote host.
DUMP: Bad return code from dump: 1
Ultimate - Let it fly and I'll be there in the end zone.
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Multilink & Networking Help
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:12:00 GMT
>1. What drivers or software do I need for my modem to work on the linux
>box?
If it's a real modem (i.e. not winmodem) it will work. No drivers are
needed -- you are basically talking to a serial port which happens to have a
modem on it.
You should compile the kernel with load ballancing support though, since
you'll have 2 modems and you want to ballance the load between them.
Run minicom and see if you can dial. This is to make sure the modem is
workning.
>2. Do I need Masquerade so that my other non Linux computers can dial
>out?
You need masquerade to share the connection with the rest of the local
network.
>3. If so, where can I get it?
Recompile the kernel with IP masquerading support.
------------------------------
From: "Miles Elam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCP and NDS
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:39:35 -0800
I would like to have a NetWare server acting as a router replaced with
a Linux machine. The current sentiment in the company is to get a hardware
router a la Cisco. When I mention the possibilities of having DNS and DHCP
on the same system, I am reminded that we're a Novell shop and Netware 5 has
made some modifications to DHCP.
NetWare 5 gives NDS server information along with the standard
IP/gateway/DNS entries in its DHCP server. I'm assuming that it is simply a
text string specifying the NDS server. Does anyone know how to get Linux's
DHCP server to spit out "extra" information and/or what exactly is
format/string that NetWare's DHCP sends as part of the DHCP lease?
I would really like to migrate the shop -- at least in part -- to
Linux, but unless I can demonstrate "equal or better functionality", I'm
dead in the water.
- Miles
------------------------------
From: "barazani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: isdn compile error - help
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 23:46:51 +0200
hi all ,
i am a newbe to linux i am trying to install isdn on my linux box .
my config is as follows linux redhat 5.2
isdn-4k-utils downloaded form ftp suse
i gzipped and tarred it and run make config
than i get an error copile failed kernel source not found .
the path is to /usr/src/linux i checked and there is an "include folder
there"
what source files sre supposed to be there and hoe can i put them in there ?
any help would do .Barazani
------------------------------
From: Rick Onanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SYN flooding...
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:44:23 -0500
"Derek Kwan - http://Derek.KWAN.on.ca" wrote:
>
> Hello World..
>
> Lately I have received a few SYN flood attack. And from the syslog it
> said something about sending SYN cookie... I know what a SYN flood
> attack is, but what is a SYN cookie? And how could SYN cookie to
> prevent/protect server from SYN flooding? Can anyone explain?
SYN cookie is a kernel option that protects you from SYN flooding. I
don't claim to know how it works. :)
> Also from my firwall log, I get some telnet (mostly, but sometime also
> get some attempts to port 113) attempts from external (which is blocked
> by firewall) network atleast 4-5 times a day, is that normal for a cable
> modem user? Or the number is a bit high/low?
>
> Derek
Attempts to port 113 are either attacks on identd, or just regular
identd requests. Are you trying to use IRC, or sendmail, or something
else that might use identd or auth from behind the firewall?
You shouldn't get a lot of telnets, especially if they're from the
same address. Do you know the originating address? If you do, send
a nice message asking what's up, most of the time it's someone who
was given an address which went down (And was later given to you).
--
rick - a guy in search of raw (ISO) cd images of SuSE and Slackware
===============
My opinions don't exist, and as such, are not anyone elses. I do not
represent anyone, not even myself, and especially not my employer.
---
Looking for a 1968 Camaro SS convertible, black interior,
beat-up rustbucket that is in need lots of restoration and TLC.
---
To email me, take out the papers and the trash
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Ty Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Multiple Network Card Problem
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 20:58:35 -0600
I have a 486 Intel dx4-100. I have two network cards in it. Redhat 5.1
and a 8 gig hard drive.
The problem is that my machine doesn't recognize the second network
card. Both have different irq's and network addresses. Does anyone
know of a fact that would point me on how to have the second network
card show up? I've found several that show me how to configure it after
it is there (ie through ifconfig using net0 and net1) but none show me
how to get net0 and net1 to show up.
Thanks, Ty Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Graham Shepherd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.telecom,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Tone activated Tel Exchanges
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 23:49:49 -0000
Matt wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Hi,
>
>Could someone mail me with the name of the software or hardware that is
>used
>by a telephone then the user is asked to enter a tone to activate a
>service.
>
>ie..
>
>ring, ring...
>Welcome..
>If you are using a tone telephone press star (*)"
>Press 1 to acivate service x...
>
>Also can this this work under linux or can it activate scripts or code
>to activate services
>so that a PC can use them or is it a hardware only activation ?
>
>Many thanks
>
>Matt
>
The autoanswer software is usualy part of the telephone switch software and
is supplied by the equipment manufacturer. If you're talking about software
to generate tones after dialling to one of these systems - I hope you're not
thinking of trying aht I think you are...
GS
------------------------------
From: Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Route problem
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 16:52:03 -0600
I have a small LAN behind a linux(linux1 for reference) box running ip
masquerading, which is connected to an ADSL bridge. This has two nic
cards and is able to ping, etc both within the LAN and outside of it. I
have another box(linux2) a dual boot box running win 95 and RH Linux 5.1
which I upgraded to kernel 2.2.1. BTW first box(linux1) has 2.2.2 and
RH 5.1. linux2 is able to access the internet and to see other
computers on the LAN from within windows, however when I try to ping
anything from within linux, it just hangs. When I try to bring up the
route table, it gives me info for eth0 and the network (192.168.1.0) and
for localhost, but then stalls for about 2 minutes before giving me the
default gw information, which is accurate. resolv.conf, host.conf,
/etc/sysconfig/network, network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0, are all the same
(except for ip addresses on a third box running RH 5.1, kernel 2.0.35-1
( i think). This third box works perfectly. Also the first box had a
similar problem when I upgraded from kernel 2.0.35 to 2.2.2, but I was
able to eliminate the problem by renaming /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S55routed to
s55routed, but on the non fucntioning machine this file does not exist.
Not sure where to turn....Thanks
Dan Drozd
------------------------------
From: "J�r�me Tollet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: smbmount vs Win98 network neightboor
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 19:15:41 +0100
Hello,
I would like to use my smbmount like the network neighboor under win98 :
when i use smbmount, i must tell //machine/service. Under win98, i can
browse all the machines on the network !
Is it possible under linux ?
thanks for help
jerome tollet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Keith Tucker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RedHat 5.2: telnet and ftp problem
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 17:04:09 -0600
OK, that worked! Now I really feel like an idiot (not your fault Fredrik, mine
for having such a small brain). The part below where "I consider myself ....
blah blah blah", well I was just trying to impress everyone. HEY!!... Thanks a
BUNCH Fredrik. It's because of people like you that make people like me feel so
good to belong to the Linux community. I have learned something, and I will
pass it on to my fellow Linux-ites.
jkt
KD5FEB (70cm and 2m only, for now)
You guys think I'm a pest now, just wait until I start setting up named, INN,
etc, etc, etc... :)
"Fredrik �lund" wrote:
> The problem is that the tcp-wrapper (inetd) does a dns-lookup when someone
> tries to connect to you machine. If that fail it will take about a minute
> before you gain access to the system. If you enter you windows machines name
> and IP in your /etc/hosts file it will work.
>
> Regards,
> Fredrik �lund
>
> Keith Tucker wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Hello All,
> >
> >I have installed RedHat 5.2 (2.0.36 kernel) Linux on a pentium 166 with
> >a 3C509 card installed. The installation went OK. Here is the
> >problem. When I try to telnet to my box with either the Windoze 95
> >telnet or HyperTerm personal edition (the one that supports WinSock), it
> >says that it is connected and telnetd is running on the Linux box, but I
> >do not get a login prompt until after about 1.5 min. The linux box is
> >not running anything that is taking up resources. I reinstalled about 3
> >times and the third time I upgraded to the 2.2.2 kernel (which went OK)
> >but to no avail. I recompiled my kernel taking out firewalling and all
> >that other stuff that I thought would cause a problem, but it still does
> >it. I have read a bunch of FAQs, the RedHat unleashed book, and the man
> >pages for inetd, telnetd, and tcpd but have come up with nothing. The
> >real strange thing is that I can telnet to my Slackware installation
> >(2.0.30) just fine. FTP acts the same way. HTTP seems to work fine
> >(although I have only tried the generic Apache web pages that come with
> >it). I have tried a slew of different IP and netmask combos (both some
> >that make sense and some that do not) with no positive results. Once
> >the login prompt comes up, everything is ok. If my session gets
> >disconnected for some reason, when I reconnect, it goes through the same
> >process. The bottom line is that I am out of ideas. I consider myself
> >fairly knowledgeable when it comes to IP, but I have more to learn than
> >I know. Am I missing something? Has anyone else had this problem?
> >Could someone please help? If I sound like I am begging, well..., I'm
> >pretty desperate. Thanks in advance. :)
> >
> >
> >Keith Tucker
> >
------------------------------
From: Peter Blazso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NE2000 compatible, pnp network card problems
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 23:10:04 +0100
Hi all,
I have a Surecom EP312-V network card, and I have already tried almost
everything to get it to work: Surecom homepage, howto, netconfig,
netcfg, kernel compilation (many times) and it still does not want to
work... It does not even show up as eth0 in the /dev directory and when
I boot my Linux box (kernel: 2.0.34, proc: 486DX) it has a line at
startup saying: 'eth0 delayed...' or something like that. Please if
someone could help, I'd greatly appreciate it!
Thanks in advance,
Peter Blazso
------------------------------
From: "Cronin B. Vining" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to compile Kernel 2.2.2 with redhat 5.2???
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 21:19:40 -0600
James Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>Dear Aaron,
>
>> I cannot get the 2.2.2 kernel to work correctly under RedHat 5.2.
>
>You must have missed something :-)
>
>> Is there an updated version of the kernel how-to that focuses primarily
on
>> redhat5.2 and the latest kernel build?
>
>Fortunately, YES! Check out:
>
>http://charlotte.redhat.com/support/docs/rhl/kernel-2.2/kernel2.2-upgrade.
html
This worked for me. But it is intimidating. BTW, RH doesn't recommend
the upgrade, unless you actually need some new driver or something. Do you
really <need> it? I only went through it to gain the experience and help
me learn the big 'L'.
- Cronin
------------------------------
From: W.D. Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Logging into Samba from Windoze 98
Date: 9 Mar 1999 03:31:37 GMT
Yep, after I got the samba passwd file, smbpasswd, setup - everything went
very well.
:-)
wda
David Kirkpatrick wrote:
> Did you setup smbpasswd? See man smbpasswd.
> d
> "W.D. Allen" wrote:
> >
> > I have been trying to get Samba connectivity from my Linux box to my
W98
> >
> > client box.
> >
> > From my W98 box, I can see the Linux box in the Mygroup that Samba is
> >
> > broadcasting. However, when I double click the linux box, it
identifies
> >
> > itself as //Linuxbox/IPC$ - and then wants a password.
> >
> > I followed the instructions in the Linux Network Toolkit book
(published
> >
> > by IDG), but it obviously leaves out some important information. What
do
> >
> > I need to really do, is there a mini-howto that specifically addresses
> >
> > what should be a realatively simple Samba connectivity setup? The
Samba-
> >
> > Howto is about as clear as mud. If someone could give me a short step-
by-
> >
> > step, I would really appreciate it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > WDA
> >
> > ------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> > http://www.searchlinux.com
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Weinberg)
Subject: terminal problem with SCO (from linux)
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 03:37:17 GMT
How do you talk to SCO machines? Are there terminal emulators that
con be run on a linux console? For Adds Viewpoint would be good. SCO
does not seem to recognize the TERM=linux. It does not seem to do
ansi like linux either.
Can you copy "linux" from the linux termcap and add it to the SCO
termcap?
CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] appreciated.
-- Ed Weinberg,
Detel, Inc., An Internet Presence Provider
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ethernet Chipset in Toshiba Notedock III?
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 23:16:55 GMT
If you know what it is, could you tell me?
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Printing
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 21:42:52 GMT
I have a computer running Linux on a network. I have a Windows 95 computer
with a printer on it. I want a program on the Linux box to print on to the
Windows printer 95 computers printer. How do I do this. is Samba the answer?
I don't need specifics "they would be nice" but a General pointing in the
right direction. Thanks
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Cottrell)
Subject: Re: DHCP and resolv.conf
Date: 9 Mar 1999 03:09:54 GMT
On my system (RH 5.2), /etc/resolv.conf is really a symbolic link to
/etc/dhcpc/resolv.conf. The file that actually gets updated by dhcp
is etc/dhcpc/resolv.conf. So, if you delete /etc/resolv.conf and
replace it with your desired setting, all should be fine. YMMV......Ian
Erik-Jan Sinke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Hi there,
:
: Can anyone tell me how I can prevent the DHCP client from modifying my
: /etc/resolv.conf file? I�ve set up my linux box as a DNS server for my
: internal network/domain. However, when I connect my PC to my Internet
: provider I automatically get the DNS server provided by them. Even worse it
: also makes my internet providers domain the standard domain for my Linux box
: (instead of my carefully selected own domain name!).
: Who can help me fix this annoying DHCP feature?
:
: Thanx in advance,
:
: Erik
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
:
:
--
============================================================================
Ian Cottrell office email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chief, Internet Services personal email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Department of Justice office: (613) 941-5233
344 Wellington Street home: (613) 829-1650
Ottawa, ON, Canada
============================================================================
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
