Linux-Networking Digest #433, Volume #10 Tue, 9 Mar 99 07:14:43 EST
Contents:
help ...networking ("Chiah")
Firewall access problem ("Odysseus")
[Q] Can't access "inter"net with 2.2.2 kernel. (jongarmpark)
Ethernet bridge (Bob Lannoy)
Problem Restricting access to NIS server (Terrence Martin)
diald compilation ("Joel Brooks")
ipip tunnels in Linux 2.1.126 (Hank Magnuski)
Re: Tone activated Tel Exchanges (Matt)
ppp & ipx routing with a linux and a win95 client ("KOSTAS PAPADIMAKIS")
Re: Anyone successfully used Addtron ISA NIC? (Mark Napper)
Re: help setting up network (David Kirkpatrick)
Re: VPN through IPFW (Ron Kuris)
Re: IP watching between 2 Hosts (Wolfgang Zenker)
Procmail problem ("Antonis Dimakis")
Driners ("Milan Hampl")
I need help on configuring a RAID 1 ("Ray")
pcmcia with RH 5.2 (manuel)
Re: Linux programming jobs? (Greg Herlein)
Re: ipfwadm vs ipchains CUSEEME w/ IPFWADM (Sean Schultz)
Re: ethernet hardware working but can't ping etc (David Kirkpatrick)
diald and first packet lost [Re: Invoke diald automatically] (Malware)
Re: ISDN setup..Siemens I-Surf card? (Malware)
Re: Win95 not working with IP masquerading? (Swindbert von und zur Waffel)
remote boot & local ping (Marco Casini)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply-To: "Chiah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Chiah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: help ...networking
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 19:01:29 +0800
I'm involved in a LAN at work, all independently running Windows98 (no
server, all stand-alones).
How can I run my system using linux on the network to share file
and
printers etc.
I have the same network card has the others in the network
------------------------------
From: "Odysseus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]~>
Subject: Firewall access problem
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 23:46:08 +1300
Reply-To: "Odysseus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]`>
I am in a university network and they insist that all traffic goes through a
proxy server which is fine for them but terrible for someone who wants
proper use of the internet. They have no socks, smtp access and no maps. I
was wondering if there is any way I could bypass via disguising packets or
something.
Any help?
------------------------------
From: jongarmpark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Q] Can't access "inter"net with 2.2.2 kernel.
Date: 9 Mar 1999 10:19:12 GMT
Hello.
This is very urgent.
I've used the networking features of Linux 2.0..36 very well.
But after I upgraded the kernel to the 2.2.2, I can't
access the outside of our network. ( It means that
I can access the "intra"net.
)
I use a Ne2000 card for ethernet networking.
Can someone help me out of this problem?
Thanks. ( I've read documents about network in the 2.2.2 kernel,
but I think they can't solve my problem.
)
--
============================================
JongAm Park [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Vision Lab.
============================================
------------------------------
From: Bob Lannoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Ethernet bridge
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 11:18:16 +0100
Hello,
I've tried to get an ethernet bridge working on a
Redhat 5.2 (2.0.36-3 kernel). Following the instructions from the
mini-HOWTO, I've enabled the
bridging in the kernel, put both ethernet-cards
into promiscuous mode and ran brcfg -ena.
>From this I get the following output:
====================================================================
bridging is ENABLED debugging is DISABLED
bridge id 0x0001 00:10:5a:e2:41:14
designated root 0x0001 00:10:5a:e2:41:14
bridge max age 20 max age 20
bridge hello time 2 hello time 2
bridge forward delay 15 forward delay 15
root path cost 0 root port 0
flags NONE
--- port stats ---
port 1 port id 0x0001 port state FORWARDING (0x3)
designated root 0x0001 00:10:5a:e2:41:14
designated bridge 0x0001 00:10:5a:e2:41:14
path cost 100 designated cost 0
designated port 1 flags NONE
port 2 port id 0x0002 port state FORWARDING (0x3)
designated root 0x0001 00:10:5a:e2:41:14
designated bridge 0x0001 00:10:5a:e2:41:14
path cost 100 designated cost 0
designated port 128 flags NONE
================================================================
Doing a tcpdump on eth0 and eth1 shows outgoing traffic on both cards.
A computer on the eth1 side however is not reachable and cannot
reach the network beyond eth0.
Does anyone have any experience with this?
cheers
bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Terrence Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problem Restricting access to NIS server
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 07:16:26 GMT
I am running RH5.2 on Intel kernel 2.0.36 with RAID patches.
What I want to do is restrict login access to this server by telnet
while still allowing sysadmins access. However it is my NIS server so I
want it to act as such and provide NIS access. I think I followed the
NIS howto but I am still able to log in as non syadmin users
Passwords and usernames changed to protect the guilty
root:xxxxxxxxxxxx:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash
bin:*:1:1:bin:/bin:
daemon:*:2:2:daemon:/sbin:
adm:*:3:4:adm:/var/adm:
lp:*:4:7:lp:/var/spool/lpd:
shutdown:*:6:0:shutdown:/sbin:/sbin/shutdown
halt:*:7:0:halt:/sbin:/sbin/halt
mail:*:8:12:mail:/var/spool/mail:
news:*:9:13:news:/var/spool/news:
uucp:*:10:14:uucp:/var/spool/uucp:
operator:*:11:0:operator:/root:
games:*:12:100:games:/usr/games:
gopher:*:13:30:gopher:/usr/lib/gopher-data:
ftp:*:14:50:FTP User:/home/ftp:
nobody:*:99:99:Nobody:/:
+sys1::::::
+sys2::::::
+sys3::::::
+:*:::::/etc/NoShell
sys1:123345345345:500:500::/home/twm139:/bin/bash
jobloe:2342365624:501:501::/home/dboyd:/bin/bash
I am unclear as to whether this is the correct file ie /etc/passwd that
I should be changed in this way or is another file supposed to be
changed?
>From the NIS howto
"If you want to restrict access for users to your NIS server, you'll
have to setup the NIS server as a client as well by running ypbind and
adding the plus-entries to /etc/passwd _halfway_ the password file. "
What does _halfway_ mean? is that halfway down the file?
Any help would be greatly appreciated, I am sure I am missing something
silly.
Thanks
Terrence
P.S. my nsswitch.conf file, I made a change to it to put nis first but
that is all:
passwd: nis files nisplus
shadow: nis files nisplus
group: nis files nisplus
hosts: files nisplus nis dns
services: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
networks: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
protocols: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
rpc: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
ethers: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
netmasks: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files
netgroup: nisplus
publickey: nisplus
automount: files nisplus
aliases: files nisplus
------------------------------
From: "Joel Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diald compilation
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 02:23:46 GMT
hi, this might be simple question, but i need help
i downloaded the source for diald, but i'm not exactly sure how to compile
it. i think i need to edit the diald.h file to reflect the paths to various
*.h files that diald needs, but i'm not sure how/where to do this.
does anyone know of a compiled binary distribution of diald? - is there such
a thing?
thx,
JB
------------------------------
From: Hank Magnuski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipip tunnels in Linux 2.1.126
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 18:04:31 -0800
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm trying to establish a very simple tunnel using 2.1.126
After reading the NET3 HOWTO I'm getting errors like
"network unreachable" and others.
Is there more recent documentation?
Is anybody using recent verions of ipip?
Thanks in advance.
Hank
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.telecom,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Tone activated Tel Exchanges
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 10:07:48 +0000
Graham Shepherd wrote:
> Matt wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Hi,
> >
> >Could someone mail me with the name of the software or hardware that is
> >used
> >by a telephone then the user is asked to enter a tone to activate a
> >service.
> >
> >ie..
> >
> >ring, ring...
> >Welcome..
> >If you are using a tone telephone press star (*)"
> >Press 1 to acivate service x...
> >
> >Also can this this work under linux or can it activate scripts or code
> >to activate services
> >so that a PC can use them or is it a hardware only activation ?
> >
> >Many thanks
> >
> >Matt
> >
> The autoanswer software is usualy part of the telephone switch software and
> is supplied by the equipment manufacturer. If you're talking about software
> to generate tones after dialling to one of these systems - I hope you're not
> thinking of trying aht I think you are...
>
> GS
And what would that be ?
Matt
------------------------------
From: "KOSTAS PAPADIMAKIS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,linux.dev.ipx,linux.dev.ppp
Subject: ppp & ipx routing with a linux and a win95 client
Date: 9 Mar 1999 10:52:22 GMT
I'm having a problem with a linux box with ppp, ipx support, and a win95
client connecting with a modem.
I'm using ipxd for ipx routing, I see that ipx routing tables are updated
from my network, the ppp interface is binded automatically with ipx some
seconds after the ppp connection (not all times, I have sometimes to
manually bind the interface with ppp), with frame type etherII.
I have tried also to add manually frame types 802.2 and 802.3.
After that I see my that win95 sees the networks that I have, but I can't
contact with another station, and win95 network neighborhood is unable to
see my netware servers.
Does anyone have any experience with ipx with ppp? I would like to read
some...
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Napper)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: Anyone successfully used Addtron ISA NIC?
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 1999 12:59:10 GMT
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 02:29:12 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I'm trying to install RedHat via ftp. The network card I'm using is an ISA
>card made by Addtron, and is supposed to be NE2000 compatible. So when I'm
>going through the installation process, I can't get the card to be
>recognized. It worked fine according to the hardware diagnostic that came on
>the Addtron floppy disk. I've tried a bunch of different I/O's and IRQ's, and
>"autoprobe" as well as "specify". Has anyone had better luck than me with
>this card? What did you do? Thanks,
Is th card a PnP Card? if so you may want to try setting the card in
DOS with its setup/diagnostic program to not use PnP, but to have a
fixed base address and IRQ.
It may not work, but that is what I had to do for my D-Link DE220PCT
PnP to work on install, rather than having to mess around with PNPDUMP
after installation
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: help setting up network
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 21:16:46 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Save yourself headaches and verify the HW is ok to use. See
www.redhat.com & Hardware-HOWTO. See the doc Network
Administrators Guide /usr/doc/LDP/nag/*.html. NET-3-HOWTO is
excellent.
ben wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been using Linux for awhile now, but never on a LAN. I'm currently
> trying to configure a linux box on my network, but I haven't the
> slightest clue as to how to setup this up.
>
> I'm using a Linksys LNEPCI II PCI Ethernet Adapter with Slackware Linux
> with kernel 2.0.36
>
> Any suggestion would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Ron Kuris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: VPN through IPFW
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:35:41 -0800
Jeff,
I recently did this. You need to find and install masquerading for GRE. I got
mine to work, after a lot of work, by building it in the kernel directly. I
don't seem to have the patch I applied originally floating around, but it had
problems when the IP address on my machine changed (i.e., I reconnected to my
ISP and they assigned me a new address).
However, it works fine now, with only one active connection at a time.
If you can't find the patches elsewhere, let me know and I'll see if I can't
assemble something. I'm still using 2.0.34 as my kernel on my router machine
(mostly because I just don't want to reboot it :-)
Ron
Jeff Undercoffer wrote:
> I have seen the earlier post as to VPN though IPFW however access to the
> link requires authorization.
>
> Question: I have a linux box set up to do IP masquerade (NAT). I have a
> need to tunnel throught the Linux box using a VPN client on the inside and
> want to connect to the VPN host somewhere on the outside. Can anyone offer
> some advice on how to configure this?
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.admin,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains,de.comm.protocols.tcp-ip
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wolfgang Zenker)
Subject: Re: IP watching between 2 Hosts
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 09:34:59 GMT
In de.comm.protocols.tcp-ip Clemens Heise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Barry !
> On Mon, 08 Mar 1999 17:16:50 GMT, Barry Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
>>The -p option specifies that it shouldn't go into Promiscuous mode, so it
>>will only see traffic to or from itself. Don't use that option if you want
>>to see traffic of other hosts.
> Thank you for assistance but it doesnt work. Let me explain:
> [..]
> Any ideas ?
I've come across tcpdump versions where the '-p' option worked just the
other way round, so you needed to specify '-p' to see traffic of other
hosts. The documentation gave the standard meaning for '-p' :-(
So just give it a try and add this option; if it works, get a better
version of tcpdump some time.
Wolfgang
------------------------------
From: "Antonis Dimakis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Procmail problem
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 13:12:31 +0200
Hi,
I have a small problem with procmail. I have made all possible filters, in
order to make e-mails to go on specific users, but, some of the e-mails
(most of them with capital letters on there username) are still going on the
root account. I tried to make a forward file and other things like that, in
order to fix this problem but it didn't work...
Any advice will be useful...
(PLS answer in my e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: "Milan Hampl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Driners
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 11:21:52 +0100
Please, I am finding native drivers for Svec PN1000-TX for Red Hat 5.1. Does
it exists? If no, can I use SCO drivers?
Many thanks for any advice.
Milda Hampl
------------------------------
From: "Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: I need help on configuring a RAID 1
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 11:11:10 GMT
Hi, i have a 4 gb SCSI boot hd and 2 9 gb SCSI data hd�s. I would do a raid
1 over the 2 9 gbhd�s, how do i ?
(raid 1 i think it is : mirroring a harddisk and keep it alive mirrored)
(i think to keep the mirror alive is much easier than to bring it to live
;-) )
Regards
The Ray
Where i work http://www.ultrasonic.at
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 12:10:34 +0100
From: manuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pcmcia with RH 5.2
Hello, I'm completely new to Linux and I'm having problems installing my
pcmcia network card D-Link 660.
The RH documentation it says that this card is supported, but the card
is not in the list of the selectable adapters, and there is no sign of
"generic cards".
Do I need to add the driver in some way or I missing something?
I know that the pcmcia carddriver are installed cause I also have a
pccard modem that works fine.
Also, any idea of where to find a Linux book for complete new users
(something like Linux for stupids)
Thanks
------------------------------
From: Greg Herlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Re: Linux programming jobs?
Date: 8 Mar 1999 20:32:54 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >I'm currently looking for work, that involves linux/unix programming, but
> >can find none. All jobs here require degree and /or 5-10 paid work
> >experience. I am a little upset now, because local authorities changing
> >law locally to allow programmer to work for more hours, but I couldn't
Volunteer and contribute to an Open Source project - at least that
will give you something concrete you can put on your resume. It very well
might lead to work, as well.
Consider looking for work as a system administrator - it mught help pay
the bills, and will give you a perspective valuable to a programmer.
Set up and write code to interface to a database - MySQL or such - and
then link your web site to it. You do have a web site, right?
There are a LOT of jobs out there for thoise who can DO - degrees and
certifications mean little to the smaller companies that just have to make
things work. Big cushy jobs with with big cushy companies will almost
always require a degree just to get past the HR department. Seek out the
smaller companies and you will find things different... but the absolute
requirement is that you have to have the skills. If you can point to
stuff you did - paid or not - that's credible, then you have a beginning.
The rest will come with time.
Greg
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Greg Herlein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Herlein Engineering www.herlein.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
------------------------------
From: Sean Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ipfwadm vs ipchains CUSEEME w/ IPFWADM
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 20:30:46 GMT
Hello,
I have configured a IP masquerading based router with
RH 5.2. I have searched this list and various HOWTOs
for some help and have most everything working.
Some questions remain unanswered, please help if you can:
(I'm obviously new to LINUX)
Q: I don't seem to have "ipautofw" do I need this and if so where
does one find that?
Q: Cuseeme doesnt work for me from any workstation (havent
tried that on the router box though). I have the
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_cuseeme.o
command in the rc.local script and I have tried
---
/sbin/depmod -a
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_irc.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_quake.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_cuseeme.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_raudio.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_vdolive.o
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p accept
/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
----
but when I connect to a reflector, I get the reflector "room" selection
box then cannot connect message box after a timeout period. ?
Q: I didnt compile the ip_masq_cuseeme.c file myself, this came
with the distribution. how can I tell if this is the correct version to use?
The source that is in the ivp4 subdirectory is from 5/27/97 (if that matters)
Q: if I look at ipfwadm -M -l I might see:
IP masquerading entries
prot expire source destination ports
tcp 01:47.33 192.168.1.2 nt-cafe.wpine.com 1848 (61040) -> 7648
udp 04:54.80 192.168.1.2 nt-cafe.wpine.com 7648 (61041) -> 7648
any clues here?
Thanks.
--
Sean Schultz
LogiVox, Inc.
Product Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(vox) 919-571-1527
(fax) 919-571-2625
http://www.logivox.com
------------------------------
From: David Kirkpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ethernet hardware working but can't ping etc
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 15:32:00 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carl,
What are your routes for both machines and ifconfig/ipconfig
"Carl L. Gay" wrote:
>
> I was hoping I could get my net configured without bothering
> the newsgroup, but...
>
> I have two PCs, one running RedHat 5.1 and one running win95.
> I have a Netgear LAN kit (FE104 hub, two FA310TX cards).
> I just want to get these two machines talking. I'm using
> version 0.90 of the tulip driver loaded as a module.
>
> ifconfig shows that when the win95 machine pings the linux
> machine some packets are received by eth0 so I believe the
> hardware is setup and working correctly. So I think
> I must have a software config problem. I've read through
> the NET-3-HOWTO and the Ethernet-HOWTO but haven't found
> a solution. Hopefully I'm overlooking something obvious.
> My next step is to check to make sure the IRQ is correct,
> I guess, but after that I'm stumped. Maybe the win95 box
> can send but not receive? Any suggestions what to try next?
>
> Thanks,
> -Carl
>
> Here's all the info I think might be relevant:
>
> $ dmesg | grep eth0
> eth0: Lite-On 82c168 PNIC at 0xfc00, 00 a0 cc 3b 82 0a, IRQ 10.
> eth0: MII transceiver #1 config 1000 status 782d advertising 01e1.
>
> $ more /etc/hosts*
> ::::::::::::::
> /etc/hosts
> ::::::::::::::
> 127.0.0.1 localhost loopback
> 192.168.0.100 dyirbal d
> 192.168.0.200 mandarin m
>
> ::::::::::::::
> /etc/hosts.allow
> ::::::::::::::
> ALL: LOCAL
>
> ::::::::::::::
> /etc/hosts.deny
> ::::::::::::::
> ALL: ALL
>
> $ ifconfig
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:16874 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:16874 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:3B:82:0A
> inet addr:192.168.0.100 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:33 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xfc00
>
> $ route -n
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1 eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2 lo
>
> $ ping localhost
> PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
>
> --- localhost ping statistics ---
> 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 0.1/0.1/0.1 ms
>
> $ ping mandarin
> PING mandarin (192.168.0.200): 56 data bytes
>
> --- mandarin ping statistics ---
> 9 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diald and first packet lost [Re: Invoke diald automatically]
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 19:30:03 +0100
Hi Glenn,
you wrote:
> URL, the browser looks it up, and off goes diald. Now, the first packet
> is usually lost, so the someone has to re-request the URL (I think there
> is a patch to fix this, again too lazy...).
Yep, there is a patch available on
http://www.image.dk/~ehcorry/linux
Versions for Kernels 2.1/2.2 can be found on
http://www-users.rwth-aachen.de/Michael.Mueller4/dynip.html
After applying one of the patch you can find a documentation in
/usr/src/linux/Documentation/networking/ip_dynaddr.txt
Malware
------------------------------
From: Malware <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ISDN setup..Siemens I-Surf card?
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 19:42:13 +0100
Hi Wayne,
you wrote:
> Does anybody out there know if the I-Surf card is supported at all? What
> type of card is it according to HiSax?
It's supported in current releases which you can get from
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/isdn4linux/v2.0/
You might have to get the latest isdn4k-utils from there too.
It's supported as type 29. A speciality of these card seems to be that
isapnp.conf needs to contain following lines:
(REG 0x31 (PEEK))
(REG 0x31 (POKE 0))
(REG 0x31 (PEEK))
For more questions please refer to de.alt.comm.isdn4linux. If your
provider does not have it available you can read/write at
www.dejanews.com. Feel free to ask in English even though the most talk
there is in German. This newsgroup is also available as mailing list
"isdn4linux" from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Malware
------------------------------
From: Swindbert von und zur Waffel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Win95 not working with IP masquerading?
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 21:51:30 +0100
So, I will tell the details...
I have the three PCs named pc1, pc2, pc3
pc1 has IP 10.0.49.252
pc2 has IP 10.0.49.253
and pc3 is my masquerading gateway with IP 10.0.41.125, the one my cable
provider assigned.
The gateway to the cable network is IP 10.0.41.254.
Each has as netmask 255.255.0.0. pc1 and pc2 have as gateway 10.0.41.125. pc3
(IP 10.0.41.125) has as gateway 10.0.41.254 (the cable modem).
And now I have win98 and linux configured on pc1. Same configuration on both
OSes. Under linux I reach the internet via the masquerading gateway. Under
win98 I cannot reach the internet.
I tried ipfwadm -M -l where I can see - more or less - what's going on... I
can see that there are some packets coming from my win98 going through the
masquerading gateway but nothing is coming back! There must be some problem
with win98 or then there is some problem in the way linux is masquerading...
but this is not very likely.. isn't it? I am very confused since there are (as
much as I know) only those three things that have to be set: IP, mask,
gateway! And I know for absoutely shure that those two settings are the same
on pc1 under win98 and linux.
Thomas
David Kirkpatrick wrote:
> In what way does it not work? What is your route and settings
> for the two machines?
> The ipfwadm looks open and ok.
>
> Swindbert von und zur Waffel wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I have a cable modem and three PCs. One of those is my masquerading box.
> > It has one NIC and the IP that I've got from my cable provider.
> > Everything is connected to just one hub. I've simply put ipfwadm -F -p
> > masquerade since I only have one NIC in the masquerading gateway. Now,
> > on my working PC I have installed Linux and Win95. For both OSes I made
> > the very same network settings (some intranet IP and the masquerading
> > box as gateway). Why does Linux work and why does Win95 NOT work with
> > the same settings? Where is the difference? What do I need to change?
> >
> > Be it Linux or Win95 running my main PC the little network consisting of
> > those three PCs and the cable modem is working perfectly alright - as
> > long as it does not come to the masquerading issue!
> >
> > The masquerading box is a 386SX, 8MB with the Linux Router Project
> > minidistribution (2.0.36). Don't laugh at that poor old SX - it's doing
> > a very good job!
> >
> > Could please send me a mail too? Best Regards... Thomas!
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Marco Casini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: remote boot & local ping
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 16:11:53 +0100
==============FD5F8F889248BB55C4B4F41D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I have a server linux based and a pc diskless linux based.
Than all work properly, i can do a telnet to the pc diskless or a ftp, i
can do a telnet from pc diskless to other pcs, but a I can't do a ping
to myself:
[remoto@fids198 ~]# ping xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
PING xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
ping: wrote xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 64 chars, ret=-1
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
...
With this problem i can't connect to the Xserver through telnet sessions
Thanks in advance for any help.
Mrc
==============FD5F8F889248BB55C4B4F41D
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML>
I have a server linux based and a pc diskless linux based.
<BR>Than all work properly, i can do a telnet to the pc diskless or a ftp,
i can do a telnet from pc diskless to other pcs, but a I can't do a ping
to myself:
<BR><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">[remoto@fids198 ~]# ping xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">PING xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx): 56 data
bytes</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">ping: sendto: Network is unreachable</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">ping: wrote xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 64 chars, ret=-1</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">ping: sendto: Network is unreachable</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">...</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#000000">With this problem i can't connect to the Xserver
through telnet sessions</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000"></FONT>
<P><FONT COLOR="#000000">Thanks in advance for any help.</FONT>
<BR><FONT COLOR="#000000">Mrc</FONT></HTML>
==============FD5F8F889248BB55C4B4F41D==
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
