Linux-Networking Digest #707, Volume #10 Thu, 1 Apr 99 19:13:38 EST
Contents:
Re: Sendmail help please.. (Dieter Koegel)
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... (John Thompson)
Re: PPP !! ERROR (Matt Long)
Re: diald and DNS queries ("D. C. Sessions")
Encripted password (Dereks2nd)
Re: HELP!!!! DNS And Samba Questions.....?!?!!? (Brian McCauley)
Re: Bridging in two stages ("Wayland Reid")
Re: NT and SAMBA (format of networkname is incorrect) (John McKee)
Re: problem with compaq internal modem ("Curt")
LINUX Webserver ("Ryan Riordan")
Re: Bridging in two stages ("Wayland Reid")
Re: Sendmail help please.. (Ido Dubrawsky)
Re: Don't wanna run 'diald', so what else??? (Bob Hauck)
suseppp/kppp troubles (Franc Vernet)
Re: ZyXEL ISDN and Liux experiense? ("Adam")
Re: Web-Browser on Sparc-Linux (Paul Hovnanian)
Re: Slow ethernet LAN driving me crazy!! ("Stavros C. Kassinos")
FAVOR_BSD? (andreas palsson)
Re: printing through samba (Greg Weeks)
Re: Direct connect two linux computers: something's wrong ("Leopold Toetsch")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.sendmail,linux.redhat.misc
From: Dieter Koegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sendmail help please..
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 17:52:03 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Benjamin John wrote:
>
> iam trying to setup sendmail so that i can use other machines to send
> mail through it.
> but i keep running into this error
> can anyone help
>
> Mar 30 23:15:29 firstconsulting sendmail[1643]: XAA01643:
> ruleset=check_rcpt, ar
> g1=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=[209.220.92.91], reject=550
> <schwager@enteract
> .com>... Relaying denied
> Mar 30 23:15:29 firstconsulting sendmail[1643]: XAA01643:
> from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> p.com>, size=0, class=0, pri=0, nrcpts=0, proto=SMTP,
> relay=[209.220.92.91]
>
[SNIP]
# Hosts that will permit relaying ($=R)
FR-o /etc/mail/relay-domains
[SNIP]
Fix /etc/mail/relay-domains e.g.:
[oreillys]:/etc/mail# more relay-domains
your_domain.com
Hope this helps
Dieter
--
___________________________________________________________________________
Dieter Koegel Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unix System Administrator http://members.xoom.com/eurdrk (ext.)
Systems and Operations http://www.eur.sas.com/~eurdrk (int.)
SAS Institute Tel: +49 6221 416 117
Europe, Middle East and Africa Fax: +49 6221 416 195
Neuenheimer Landstrasse 28-30 Mobile: +49 172 6249 428
P.O.-BOX 105340
D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
___________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------
From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 07:32:26 -0600
Stuart Fox wrote:
> My argument still stands - a PROPERLY configured NT box will not blue screen
Perhaps so, but it appears that the people capable of
configuring NT "properly" so that it doesn't BSOD are
scarcer than hen's teeth...
--
-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: Matt Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PPP !! ERROR
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 22:00:19 GMT
I've run into this problem twice. The first time it was because I had a
windmodem and didn't know it (I thought it seemed awefully inexpensive).
The second time, however, (this time with a US Robotics internal modem
with jumpers) the problem was with the IRQ and COM (cuan [where n is a
number between 0 and 3] in Linux) settings. Now if your modem is
external, you will have to consult your documentation on how to change
the IRQ and COM settings, but if it is internal, the only way to
configure the IRQ and COM settings manuyally is with jumpers. If you
don't have any jumpers, you either have a PnP (Plug and Play) modem or
you have a windmodem. I will assume that you do have jumpers.
The problem I ran into was that my mouse (serial mouse, not PS/2) was
already using COM1. Keep in mind that COM1 and COM3 use IRQ 4. COM2 and
COM4 use IRQ 3. So, I originally had my modem set to COM1 (IRQ4) so I
just switched the IRQ jumber to IRQ3 and the COM jumper to COM2. I don't
know if this addresses you problem, but this has been my experience.
-Matt
p.s. You might want to poke around your /proc directory to see what's
going on.
andylow wrote:
>
> I had checked the interrupts but there is no proccess using my modem's IRQ.
>
> Andy
>
> andylow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> : I'm facing this ppp problem, my dial up is working fine last time
> until
> : last night when I try connect to the net, I was put off by this error.
>
> : Apr 1 10:58:22 spider kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
> : Apr 1 10:58:22 spider kernel: registered device ppp0
> : Apr 1 10:58:22 spider pppd[1118]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
> : Apr 1 10:58:22 spider pppd[1118]: tcgetattr: Input/output error(5)
> : Apr 1 10:58:23 spider pppd[1118]: Exit.
>
> It means that some other process is using the modem's IRQ and preventing
> pppd from getting the modem device file's ( /dev/ttySx, x = whatever )
> attributes. "cat /proc/interrupts" to find out what IRQs your devices
> use.
>
> --
> Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
> /* Editing with vi is a lot better than using a huge swiss army knife. */
--
For good news go to
http://members.tripod.com/goodnewsforyou/goodnews.html
------------------------------
From: "D. C. Sessions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: diald and DNS queries
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 14:14:18 -0700
Mike Jagdis wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ronald Hovens wrote:
> >However, when I use diald 0.16 for
> >a virtual permanent connection, the linux box starts dialing my ISP on
> >very strange moments:
> >
> >sit. 1 after starting my laptop, that connects to my ethernet
> >sit. 2. when I look at network neighbourhood and click on the linuxbox
> >icon on my laptop
> >sit. 3 when I take a look at the printer queue of the printer that is
> >connected to the Linux box and is usable from the Win98 laptop thru
> >samba.
> >
> >According to the systemlog, the diald rule that brings up the connection
> >is a DNS packet rule (port 53). I can see that a DNS query is done to my
> >ISP's DNS servers, (the ones that are stored within the win98 DNS
> >settings an in /etc/resolv.conf). I'ts ok that diald brings up the
> >connection for a DNS query, since the ISP's DNS servers are outside my
> >ethernet, BUT WHY IS THE DNS LOOKUP PERFORMED, EVEN WHEN I LOOK AROUND
> >WITHIN MY ETHERNET (sit 1...3)?
>
> All together now... "BECAUSE ITS WINDOWS!"
>
> Windows does all kinds of weird and wonderful look ups. If it is
> configured to use WINS samba may be relaying requests through DNS.
> If Windows is set up to use DNS it generates requests itself.
>
> >Does running a DNS server on my own
> >linux box resolve this problem?
>
> No, but if you point Windows at that instead of your ISP and have
> your local server forward requests externally it gives you a useful
> point to trace DNS queries. Once you know what bogus queries are
> going on you can trap them either with hosts files or by setting
> up dummy zones on your local server.
Aliasing out *.microsoft.com is a good start. Cow-orkers
report that the newer flavors of losedoze check in with Mama
whenever they wake up. Dunno for myself, since having run
a virus scan and found myself Microsoft-free.
--
D. C. Sessions
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dereks2nd)
Subject: Encripted password
Date: 1 Apr 1999 22:29:18 GMT
I now have Win98 workstation linking to a Linux RedHat 5.2 server ( works
Great ) only problem is I am having to use plain text passwords which requires
a registry change. In order to use Encripted passwords the documentation says
that samba has to be linked with 'libdes'. Does anyone know how to check
whether it actually has been ... I am using Samba 2.0.3 and if it hasn't how I
link it.
Derek
------------------------------
From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP!!!! DNS And Samba Questions.....?!?!!?
Date: 31 Mar 1999 18:48:11 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> PLEASE E-MAIL THE ADDRESS BELOW WITH ANY HELP YOU COULD PROVIDE!!!!!
>
>
> The Briefing:
>
> I recently built a home network: 2 win95 pentiums, 1 RH Linux 486-100. Each
> w/ an ISA 10B-T NIC going to a 3Com Hub. The network is working great, I play
> Quake 2 on it regularly. This linux box have these purposes: WWW (intranet)
> Server, FTP, DNS, and Samba Directory Sharing.
>
> Problem One:
>
> DNS Appears to be working. From install I've only edited the hosts file, and
> the hosts.allow file and added entries for alias' of the Linux box, and
> entries for the win95 machines. Kind of looks like this:
>
> 127.0.0.1 (local loopback default stuff)
> 192.123.123.1 dns.mydomain.com dns
> 192.123.123.1 www.mydomain.com www
> 192.123.123.2 demerson.mydomain.com demerson
> 192.123.123.3 mwallace.mydomain.com mwallace
The /etc/hosts file is only used by the local machine. It is *not*
used by the DNS server when answering requests from other machines.
You must create proper zone files.
BTW: Do not use just any made up numbers 192.123.x.x for your internet
- use 192.168.x.x
> Pinging FROM any other
> (win95) machine using a FQDN or alias either takes an extremely long time to
> return (one minute?) or waits and returns "Bad IP Address" Why is this
> behaving so strangely?
Because you have not set up a nameserver as authoratative for your
network. You presumably have a caching-only server that is trying to
talk to the internet.
> QUESTION NUMBER TWO:
>
> This evening I will be adding a second hard disk to the Linux box. First, I
> can manage the install, partition, and format, but how do I have linux
> automatically mount the disk upon boot up?
Add an entry to /etc/fstab.
> QUESTION NUMBER THREE:
>
> Once installed, I want to share this new disk with everyone on the network
> with no restrictions. By default, I noticed that Linux automatically shared
> the home directory of the person who is logged on. (This is "Samba" right?)
> Where do I specify that I want to share the new disk?
Create a section for it in smb.conf:
[sharename]
comment = whatever
path = /whatever
guest ok = yes
read only = no
For details "man smb.conf"
--
\\ ( ) No male bovine | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. _\\__[oo faeces from | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
.__/ \\ /\@ /~) /~[ /\/[ | +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
. l___\\ /~~) /~~[ / [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
# ll l\\ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
###LL LL\\ (Brian McCauley) |
------------------------------
From: "Wayland Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bridging in two stages
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 13:42:28 -0500
> What type of wireless stuff is it? Some works as a switch, some as a
>NIC, and some on serial... If you have it on serial, you can set up for
>dial up PPP, and run Masquerade at home. If it is a NIC, you will have to
>route at home, and run Masquerade at work... You could set up a tunnel at
>work, however.
>
I have a Proxim Rangelan2 card in each linux machine. Right now I am
masq'ing at work and routing from home. Everything works well, but I
haven't had time lately to test everything. I'm using the RangeLan2
drivers from Dave Korberstein. So, in essence, the whole situation can be
treated as if the wireless link is just another vanilla 10BaseT wired
network. I don't understand why the bridge didn't work, since you can have
several bridges in a network. Mind you this is just my networking book
knowledge talking. I've never had practical experience with this sort of
thing before.
- Wayland Reid
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John McKee)
Subject: Re: NT and SAMBA (format of networkname is incorrect)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 22:35:03 GMT
Reading the smb.conf section on the "security" parameter, the default for Samba 2.0 +
is "user" and
the user must first "log-on" with a valid username and password.
I use:
security = share
which eliminates the need for usernames and passwords. But, I'm running a small
office, and
security is not a concern, yet!
HTH,
On Thu, 1 Apr 1999 22:01:09 +0200, "Patrick Scharrenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hello..
>
>I have just set up my samba server again to use it with NT
>normaly it worked but now.. not
>
>the samba server is shown in the NT-neighbourhood but if I click on it I get
>an errormessage like:
>
>" Can't access samba.
>the format of the networkname is incorrect"
>
>If I put the samba-server in the same workgroup as the NT-machine and my
>samba is the masterbrowser, I get this errormessage when I try to acces the
>workgroup
>
>It also dosn't work if I use wins.
>my authentication uses plaintext-pw
>
>the nt-machine has sp4
>samba version is 2.0.3
>
>smb.conf:
> workgroup = DUKE
> netbios name = ROUTER
> server string = SAMBA
> interfaces = 192.168.0.1/255.255.255.0
> encrypt passwords = Yes
> log level = 3
> syslog = 3
> log file = /var/log/smb.log
> name resolve order = lmhosts wins bcast
> os level = 150
> preferred master = Yes
> domain master = Yes
> dns proxy = No
> wins support = Yes
> lock dir = /var/adm
> mangle case = Yes
>
>[homes]
> comment = home directories
> read only = No
> create mask = 0700
> browseable = No
>
>Linux Kernel is 2.2.3
>
>I don't understand it
>
>
>please help me...
>c.u.
>..patrick
>
>
>
>
John McKee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: problem with compaq internal modem
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 13:43:16 -0500
Most internal 56K modems are 'winmodems' and don't work with linux.
Get a good external modem.
dementen wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>My compaq presario modem 56kflex is not recognised by linux, i.e.
>cat /dev/ttyS1 ====> input/output error but run very well under win95
>:-(.
>
>What can i do ?
>
>Thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Ryan Riordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: LINUX Webserver
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 18:48:26 GMT
I have been given the onerous task of setting up a Linux webserver in 2
months. I have the necessary resources to throw at the job and do it right.
I will be using Red Hat 5.2, and a dual PII SCSI system on a T1 line. What
issues should I be most concerned about and where can I get good technical
how to on running and seting up our webserver. We will be doing lots of
data access and security is an issue. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
------------------------------
From: "Wayland Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bridging in two stages
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 14:11:52 -0500
Lee Sharp wrote
> Your network is already segmented. The only question is if it is
>segmented on layer 2 or 3. Layer 2 is cleaner, and easier to
troubleshoot.
>
Well, yes that's true my network is physically segmented. Perhaps I should
have said I it will segment my address space.
>
> Windows networking works fine over routers. The only "gotcha" is name
>resolution. LMhosts. or a WINS server, or Samba can cover this. What you
>may want to do, is set up a routed environment with private IPs on lan B,
>and tunnel LAN a IPs. Or, you can multinet the lan B ethernet card, and
>have a mix of IPs there.
>
Could you briefly explain how I would go about routing NetBEUI packets from
LAN A to LAB B?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ido Dubrawsky)
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.sendmail,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Sendmail help please..
Date: 31 Mar 1999 13:18:37 -0600
Another way to permit relaying is to use the access list. Setup the access list
that is mentioned in the sendmail docs at sendmail.org, and simply put in the
domains that you want to permit relaying for. It reduces the number of files
you have to administer since that is also the file you can use to reject spam.
See the anti-spam section at www.sendmail.org.
Ido
In article <7dtq0d$hbd$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Claus Assmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Benjamin John wrote:
>
>> g1=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=[209.220.92.91], reject=550
>> <schwager@enteract
>> .com>... Relaying denied
>
>Look at this:
>
>> # Hosts that will permit relaying ($=R)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> FR-o /etc/mail/relay-domains
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Is
>209.220.92.91
>your machine? Do you want to "permit relaying" for it?
>Add it to the file, restart sendmail, and you're set.
>Otherwise see:
>http://www.sendmail.org/~ca/email/relayingdenied.html
>
>--
>If it's tourist season, why can't we shoot them?
>[Don't send me copies of Usenet posting! It's annoying.]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Hauck)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: Don't wanna run 'diald', so what else???
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 18:57:27 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jon Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't like 'diald'. It works fine. But I want something a little
> more interactive.
>
> I would like to be able to dial-up and hangup from a remote machine.
alias up='echo "up" > /etc/diald.ctl'
alias dn='echo "down" > /etc/diald.ctl'
Modify to suit where your configuration puts the control fifo for
diald (see "man diald"). You could do the same thing from a web
page with a simple cgi script.
--
11:45:00 up 37 days, 2:08, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.01, 0.00
------------------------------
From: Franc Vernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: suseppp/kppp troubles
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 21:03:22 +0200
Yes! I finally got my ppp-connection going....or have I?
I usually connect using ppp-up script made using suseppp.
Each time I hang up and try to connect again, the modem doesn't react.
When I start kppp and try to connect, it won't work saying there's no
dial tone, but luckily (?) enough, when I try ppp-up again it works!!
How can this happen and how can I change things so I won't have to do
this trick each time I want to connect?
Hope someone can help...
Franc.
------------------------------
From: "Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ZyXEL ISDN and Liux experiense?
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 23:21:08 -0500
Yeah -- I have, it works fine. I haven't used it in awhile though, it kinda
broke (methinks Lightning or something took it out). Anyway, I wasn't as
Linux savy when I was using it then and had run dual-boot between 95 and
Linux -- 95's software got the hardware on the TA working correctly and then
I'd boot into Linux and everything was fine -- could even run dual ISDN if
needed. Like I said, I wasn't as big on Linux then as I am now, so I can't
tell you how easy your trip will be, but it should work...
Adam
Klas Eliasson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:01be7aca$99e29b60$0100a8c0@ntserver...
> Anyone tried ZyXELs Omni.Net Plus ISDN TA with Linux?
>
> I am going to try next week but i thought I should take a look and see if
> there is any known problems...
>
> file://Klas, sweden
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.x,comp.os.linux.development.apps
From: Paul Hovnanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Web-Browser on Sparc-Linux
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 18:35:40 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm looking for a Web-Browser that I can use on an Sparc Station 5 that is
> running on Sparc-Linux (Redhat 5.2).
>
> Is here anybody, who can give me a hint, what is the best one to use on
> such a system?
> The bad thing is that one can't compile Netscape by himself. :-((
See: http://www.mozilla.org/
--
Paul Hovnanian (here) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(there) mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send spam to: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=======================================================================
"Very funny, Scotty! Now beam down my clothes."
------------------------------
From: "Stavros C. Kassinos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Slow ethernet LAN driving me crazy!!
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 15:35:56 -0800
I am having problems with a slow ethernet on a local LAN. I had some
could
suggestions from people in this list, and I would like to thank
everyone.
The problemis still there. One suggestion was to make sure that both of
the
NICs
connected to the hub are in half-duplex. The LAN is a 100base-T
connection. One
of the cards is a 3com vortex (3c905). I run a diagnostic on it and I
know is
running full-duplex.
How can I force it to half-duplex?
In the options listed on
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
I do not see one specifically for half-duplex. Here is the output from
the
diagnostics (if you see anything else strange please let me know):
./vortex-diag -a -e -m
vortex-diag.c:v1.07 11/24/98 Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Found a 3Com PCI Ethernet 3c905 rev 0 at 0xff00.
Indication enable is 06c6, interrupt enable is 069e.
No interrupt sources are pending.
Transceiver/media interfaces available: MII.
MAC settings: full-duplex.
Maximum packet size is 0.
Station address set to 00:10:4b:9a:ec:4a.
Configuration options 4000.
Parsing the EEPROM of a 3Com Vortex/Boomerang:
3Com Node Address 00:10:00:10:00:10 (used as a unique ID only).
OEM Station address 00:10:00:10:00:10 (used as the ethernet address).
Manufacture date (MM/DD/YY) 0/16/0, division , product .
Options: none.
Vortex format checksum is incorrect (00 vs. 10).
Cyclone format checksum is incorrect (00 vs. 10).
MII PHY found at address 24, status 786f.
MII PHY 0 at #24 transceiver registers:
3100 786f 2000 5c01 0141 40a1 0001 0000
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0001 8060
8020 0c38 0000 1800 a3b9 0076 1405 001b.
Thanks for any help.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Stavros C. Kassinos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a home LAN comprising of 2 linux boxes (Box-1 and Box-2). They
> > are both running RedHat Linux 5.2 . The two machines are connected with
> > 100base-T ethernet via a hub. Box-1 is the server connected to the ISP
> > via DSL.
> >
> > I am using masquerating and ip-forwarding on Box-1 the server.
> > Everything seems to work ok, both machines see each other and the world.
> > From the client machine I can ping, telnet and ftp to machines outside
> > the LAN.
> >
> > PROBLEM: The connection, even the local one just between Box-1 and
> > Box-2, is slow. FTP transfer rates are only 1-5Kb/sec!!
> >
> > Does anybody have any suggestions where the problem lies?
> >
> > Thank you for any response.
> >
> > --
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > Stavros C. Kassinos | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> > | Office: (650)-723-0546 |
> > Center for Turbulence Research | Fax: (650)-723-4548 |
> > Stanford University | www.stanford.edu/~kassinos |
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> Also, make sure your 10BaseT cable isn't running next to any extension or
> power cords. This may cause a lot of errors and a lot of retransmits.
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
--
==============================================================
Stavros C. Kassinos | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Office: (650)-723-0546 |
Center for Turbulence Research | Fax: (650)-723-4548 |
Stanford University | www.stanford.edu/~kassinos |
==============================================================
------------------------------
From: andreas palsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FAVOR_BSD?
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 22:10:10 +0200
Hello.
I was experimenting with SOCK_RAW and discovered in
/usr/include/netinet/tcp.h that there's two "tcphdr"-struktures which of
one is used depending on if
"__FAVOR_BSD" is set to true or not.
My question is, which one should I use and what is the story behind this
mysterious "__FAVOR_BSD" definition?
Thanks in advance..
--
------------------------------
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Weeks)
Subject: Re: printing through samba
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 17:39:34 -0600
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Gary S. Mackay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I now have printing working from the slackware box using the apsfilter.
> I can not get it to print from any of the WinXX boxes tho. I have the
> new Samba-2.0.3 installed and working fine. It runs the login scripts,
> maps drives, etc. I can see and attach to the printer in net'hood, but
> when I go to print, it errors saying access denied.
Check the permissions on the spool directories. Samba writes the file
you're trying to print as the user into whatever spool directory you
tell it to. It then passes it to the local printing system with
whatever command you tell it to use. If the user doesn't have write
access in whatever directory you told it to use. BOOM, access denied.
Greg Weeks
--
http://durendal.tzo.com/greg/
------------------------------
From: "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Direct connect two linux computers: something's wrong
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 19:26:05 +0200
Georg Oehl wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Again, I can not get ping echos from one machine to the other (between
>192.168.1.4 and 192.168.2.4). Pings to localhost and the respective
>machines� own IP-addresses work just fine.
So these to machines are on two different networks with your mask
255.255.255.0. , they don't talk to each other.
You have
PC1 -> PC2 -> ISP
eth0 -> eth0,ippp0 -> isp
(I don't know, what is your eth1 on PC2 good for)
Put PC1 & PC2 into the same network, make PC2 the gateway on PC1, make your
ISP the gateway on PC2, turn on masquerading on PC2 and it should work.
leo
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
