Linux-Networking Digest #463, Volume #10 Thu, 11 Mar 99 23:13:49 EST
Contents:
Re: Cable Modem Problems ... (Lew Pitcher)
DE-660 & pcnet_reset_8390 error (Bernie Ott)
Re: Resetting modems remotely ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Stupid Netscape question. ("Ger Donners")
actiontec PCMCIA fast ethernet card (Glauco Cenciotti)
Re: How to browse the internet via ppp? (Clifford Kite)
Re: NFS With Linux, IBM RS6000 and HP 9000 (L J Bayuk)
Re: can't login to Linux from Win95 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: w98/95-linux ("bane")
Re: Cable Modem Problems ... ("Desmond Coughlan")
Re: newbie: to hub or not to hub? ("bane")
Packet Filtering with dynamic =?iso-8859-2?Q?IP=B4s?= (Folker Wendt)
Re: Can I shutdown linux remotely? ("John Hardin")
Re: Dialup access to Netware through OpenLinux remote access server (George
Tirebiter)
Slow Telnet & FTP response ("Ste")
Modem sharing on Linux? ("Gary S. Mackay")
Need Linux ERPCD for Annex3 (Dave D. Cawley)
Re: help PPP script failing (Clifford Kite)
Re: hacked login (telnet) (Colin)
Win95 Group Policies ("Serge Poirier")
Tuning the network in Linux (root)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: Cable Modem Problems ...
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:14:23 GMT
On 11 Mar 1999 20:55:45 GMT, "Desmond Coughlan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a question as to how I can go about getting my new cable modem to
>work.
>
>The modem is a Motorola CyberSurfer Wave, and when I boot into Linux, I see
>the following:
>
>ne2k-pci.c:v0.99L 2/7/98 D. Becker/P. Gortmaker
>http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/ne2k-pci.html
>ne2k-pci.c: PCI NE2000 clone 'RealTek RTL-8029' at I/O 0xd800, IRQ 10.
>eth0: PCI NE2000 found at 0xd800, IRQ 10, 00:00:B4:9B:20:1C.
>ne2k-pci.c: PCI NE2000 clone 'RealTek RTL-8029' at I/O 0xd400, IRQ 11.
>eth1: PCI NE2000 found at 0xd400, IRQ 11, 00:40:05:E2:F5:D2.
>
>This strikes me as bizarre, seeing that I did no configuration whatsoever,
>for the second card, which is the one to which my modem is connected ...
>:-| In addition, the box says SN2000, but I assume that it is an NE2000
>compatible.
>
>I run ifconfig, and see the following:
>
>eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:B4:9B:20:1C
> inet addr:192.68.0.1 Bcast:192.68.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:6 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:49 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 coll:0
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0xd800
>
>The second card isn't there, as you can see.
>
>So my question is: how do I enable that card at boot?
Some drivers autodetect all cards of the same type (as you saw), and
build the devices in sequence. I'd say the driver detected your
cable-modem ethernet card and installed it as eth1.
However, this does not mean that Linux knows how to get to eth1, just
that it exists. You still have to ifconfig the eth1 device in order to
get it to work. Your ISP might require you to use DHCP, in which case
you'll have to do a little bit of research.
>I can ping to the inside of my LAN, but not to the outside, and I can't
>resolve hostnames either. I've read the NET-3 HOWTO, but the problem is
>that I can't pass parameters to LILO when I boot, as I don't use LILO: I
>boot from a diskette. I could install from scratch, and install LILO, but
>my system is running just the way I want it, including my girlfriend's
>thesis ... :-)
>
>Why don't I just type:
>
>dd if=/dev/fd0 of=/vmlinuz
>
>I hear you ask ...
>
>I tried: when I run LILO, it tells me the kernel is too big.
>
>Your suggestions would be welcome, as I have 2 Mb/s just waiting to be used
>here ... :-)
>
>Thanks.
>
>D.Coughlan.
Lew Pitcher
System Consultant, Development Services
Toronto Dominion Bank
(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employers')
------------------------------
From: Bernie Ott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: DE-660 & pcnet_reset_8390 error
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 01:35:23 GMT
A previous post on this subject got little response. Here's another
post.
I've got a laptop with a D-LINK DE-660 pcmcia network card.
I've got RedHat 5.2 installed.
I had this card working for a few hours one night about 2 weeks ago, but
have not had any luck since. It works fine under Windows 98.
I'm getting the following error:
pcnet_reset_8390(): did not complete
I'm getting to high-toned beeps, indicating a successful install.
Anytime I reinstall Linux, I have to go in to /etc/pcmcia/config.opts
and
add my hardware address to one of the lines, otherwise I get an error
message
about not being able to determine my Hardware Address.
I've tried using the Card Services 3.05, 3.08, and 3.09.
The 3.09 version is where I had luck a few weeks ago.
Please help. I've seen references to people using this successfully,
but can't find docs or even a site that explains what this error message
means.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Resetting modems remotely
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 02:12:20 GMT
I am temporarily all that our ISP has for a sysadmin (normally, I just do
tech support and routine monitoring) and have very limited Unix knowledge. I
need to be able to interrupt a modem that is being used by someone abusing it
(ie. a limited use account logged on for 24+ hours pinging)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Raymond Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you can telnet to the apropriate pop server then you can start
> minicom /dev/ttySx and giove a atz on that port.
> But I can't imagine that a ISP let you do that. (At least I would'nt
> want my users reconfigureing my modems).
> You should say this to your ISP, he should program the modems this way:
> If the DTR is dropped, the modem should reset and then you have never a
> problem that modems lose their settings.
>
> Raymond
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Ger Donners" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Stupid Netscape question.
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 00:50:37 +0100
Is there a firewall involved ? FTP through Netscape shouldn't be a problem.
Can you ftp to the same site with the command line ftp ??
Ger Donners
Sean Loaring wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Netscape can't download anything right to save it's life. Any way to
>pass a url to wget instead of having Netscape use it's download
>fuctionality (or lack there of)? I have been playing around with the
>'helper applications' but havn't been getting anywhere.
>
>Thanks in advance
>
>Sean
>
------------------------------
From: Glauco Cenciotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: actiontec PCMCIA fast ethernet card
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 20:17:11 -0600
Hi,
I've just bought a new actiontec PCMCIA fast ethernet card and I've
tried to use it in a RedHat 5.2 system on a Mitac laptop, both with
kernel 2.0.36 and 2.2.3. It isn't recognized so it doesn't work.
Is there anyone who knows how to make it working?
The exact model is : Actiontec FastNet pro 100 (mod num. ne20000-01)
Thank you
Glauco.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: How to browse the internet via ppp?
Date: 11 Mar 1999 14:57:10 -0600
jedi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: On Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:25:52 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: >Hi all,
: >I have a linux box with a modem and connected to our LAN. Our LAN is connected
: >via a leased line to the internet. When I ring the modem from home I can login
: >to the linux box and use Lynx to browse the internet, but I would like to be
: >able to use a browser like Netscape on my computer at home to browse the
: >internet.
: >Can you please point me in the right direction?
: You can run Netscape remotely. Although, that's an ugly
: propsition without a really good network pipe.
Agreed. Slow as molasses over a PPP link with just X.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Speak softly and carry a +6 two-handed sword. */
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (L J Bayuk)
Subject: Re: NFS With Linux, IBM RS6000 and HP 9000
Date: 12 Mar 1999 03:00:06 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>This may have nothing to do with a fault in Linux but may be down to our
>database.
>
>I have setup two NFS shares , shares 1 and 2. These are as follows :-
>
>1) A NFS share between an IBM RS6000 and a HP 9000. The data will be held on
>the RS6000 to be accessed by the HP9000.
>
>2) A NFS share between a Linux box and the HP 9000. The data will be held on
>the Linux and be accessed by the HP9000.
>
>HP9000 K2000 runs UniData 3 database under HP-UX 10.30
>RS6000 runs AIX
>Linux Box runs Suse 5.2 with kernel 2.2
>
>The data that are held in each case is a UNIDATA database file. However when
>trying to access share 1, the system works find and data can be read and
>wrutten to no problem
>
>But on share 2, the HP9000 complains that it cannot create file locks.
>
>Is there something different about NFS on Linux than on the other two
>systems. Note normal file copy operations seems to be OK, and therefore I
>reckon it's something to do with our database.
My understanding is that Linux NFS has no lockd/statd support so you
are out of luck in terms of file locking over NFS when the files live
on a Linux box. I may be (hope) I'm wrong on this, but...
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: can't login to Linux from Win95
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 02:59:30 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Raymond Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you wanna logon to your Linux server, you should configure SambA as a
> logon server and be sure that the domain name is equal to the workgroup
> name!
>
> Raymond
>
What is name of the 'logon server' rpm package?
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "bane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: w98/95-linux
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:18:13 -0800
That's a good one.
...or better.
HAHA let me laugh out loud for awhile now HAHA
------------------------------
From: "Desmond Coughlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Cable Modem Problems ...
Date: 11 Mar 1999 22:39:43 GMT
Update to this :
I found dhcpd on the net, untarred it into /usr/local, and ran make:
gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2
-malign-functions=2 -I. -c peekfd.c
gcc -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2
-malign-functions=2 -I. -c udpipgen.c
udpipgen.c: In function `udpipgen':
udpipgen.c:78: `IPDEFTTL' undeclared (first use this function)
udpipgen.c:78: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
udpipgen.c:78: for each function it appears in.)
make: *** [udpipgen.o] Error 1
Ideas ..?
D.C.
------------------------------
From: "bane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: newbie: to hub or not to hub?
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:21:26 -0800
Maybe you have no intentions NOW of hooking up any other comps
question? What if you felt like hosting a LAN party?
and coax i don't beleive is ful duplex (if that would factor for you i do
not know.
I had a coax network once and changed to hub and liked it alot better
but if you do have the combo NIC your alright cause you can change later
------------------------------
From: Folker Wendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Packet Filtering with dynamic =?iso-8859-2?Q?IP=B4s?=
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 03:52:12 +0100
I have my LAN connected to the Internet over a Linux-Gateway using ISDN
(ippp0). Everything works fine with masquerading. Now I want to set up
packetfiltering when the link goes up. =
I inserted following lines in the dial-up script, where $INTERFACE means
ippp0:
# flush and deny everything
ipfwadm -O -f
ipfwadm -I -f
ipfwadm -O -p deny
ipfwadm -I -p deny
=
# my LAN needs full accces to the gateway
ipfwadm -O -a accept -b -S 0.0.0.0/0 -D -W eth0
ipfwadm -I -a accept -b -D 0.0.0.0/0 -S 192.168.42.0/24 -W eth0
# accept dns
ipfwadm -O -a accept -P udp -S 0/0 53 1024:65535 -D 0/0 53 -W
$INTERFACE
ipfwadm -I -a accept -P udp -D 0/0 53 1024:65535 -S 0/0 53 -W
$INTERFACE
ipfwadm -O -a accept -P tcp -S 0/0 53 1024:65535 -D 0/0 53 -W
$INTERFACE
ipfwadm -I -a accept -P tcp -D 0/0 53 1024:65535 -S 0/0 53 -k -W
$INTERFACE
# accept connect from gateway to internet, PORT 113(auth) needed
for Provider Authentication
ipfwadm -O -a accept -P tcp -S 0/0 1024:65535 -D 0/0 -W
$INTERFACE
ipfwadm -I -a accept -P tcp -D 0/0 1024:65535 -S 0/0 -k -W
$INTERFACE
ipfwadm -I -a accept -P tcp -D 0/0 113 -S 0/0 -W $INTERFACE
# deny, last match
ipfwadm -I -a deny -o -P tcp -S 0/0 -D 0/0 -W $INTERFACE
ipfwadm -I -a deny -o -P udp -S 0/0 -D 0/0 -W $INTERFACE
My default Forwarding Rule is:
ipfwadm -F -a accept -P all -S 192.168.42./24 -D 0/0 -m -W
$INTERFACE
IT DOESN=B4T WORK, and I don=B4t know why. My kernel message when the
connections hangs is as follows:
ipppd[96]: local IP address 212.7.130.45
ipppd[96]: remote IP address 212.7.128.195
kernel: ip_rewrite_addrs(): shifting saddr from 192.168.0.99 to
212.7.130.45 (state 4)
The LAST LINE appears only with my rules, after a while the connections
goes down and afterwards up again and so on.
What is wrong?
Thanks for your help,
Folker Wendt
------------------------------
From: "John Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can I shutdown linux remotely?
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:39:49 -0800
Stone wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>telnet to the linux box. The do a who to see what terminal you are. cd
/etc and
>edit securtty and add that terminal. These are the terminals that are
allowed to
>log in as root. log out. Then telnet back to the linux box and log in as
root.
Bzzzt! Wrong!
The *only* terminals that should be in /etc/securetty are the ones
referring to the system console(s).
If you need to perform administrative actions remotely, log in as a
non-administrative user (preferably using ssh), then run "su -c" to become
root, or use "sudo" to run a single command as root.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpk -a finger://gonzo.wolfenet.com/jhardin PGP key ID: 0x41EA94F5
PGP key fingerprint: A3 0C 5B C2 EF 0D 2C E5 E9 BF C8 33 A7 A9 CE 76
=======================================================================
If you spend any time administering Windows NT, you're far too
familiar with the Blue Screen of Death (BSOD) ...
- "MSDN Flash" email newsletter, 2/9/1999
------------------------------
From: George Tirebiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dialup access to Netware through OpenLinux remote access server
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 22:31:12 GMT
[posted and mailed]
Not sure what you're asking here. Win95 ppp dialin users can have direct ipx
access to the netware server and appear as nodes on the network - then use
their local MS netware client to access the files directly from the server
with no further machinations. It's a bit of a pain to set up and you have to
make sure your pppd has ipx support compiled in. There's a few web links
around that describe this - search for ppp and ipx and you should find them.
If you are using ncpmount to mount the Netware volumes on /Netware,
why not just mount them on
/home/ftp/pub/whatever - you can use ncpmount as many times as you like
and mount volumes wherever you want. Just be careful about the -f and -d
options to ncpmount so that you don't open all up to whomever, and check
your ppp security settings carefully.
"Joseph Red" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have an OpenLinux1.3 box we're using for remote access (Win95 clients).
> Is it possible for the dialup users to easily access the NetWare server
> volumes? I can currently telnet into the linux box, and access the volumes
> that way, but I'm looking for an easy way for the users to grab files off
> the NetWare server. I tried creating a link to /NetWare in /home/ftp/pub
> but it doesn't work w/ graphical ftp clients. If I telnet in & start an ftp
> session there, I have no problems following the link.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Joseph Red
> BCM, Inc.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
<<Mean Time Between Failures>>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Ste" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Slow Telnet & FTP response
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 02:20:14 -0000
Hi,
Lill help needed.
Currently have two Red Hat servers (1x5.1 & 1x5.2), connected to an ethernet
LAN using 3com office connect hubs, and both have 3c509 nics.
>From a w'98 machine I can connect to them instantly using http, but telnet
takes EXACTLY 1m 15 sec for the server to respond after connection and
around the same time for FTP - using various clients.
I have tried connecting to the same hub, from a different hub on the same
segment and even telnetting from one server to the other... same result.
The only thing that gets me is the connection is made within seconds but it
takes so long for the prompts to be displayed on the client.
Any clues ?
Regards,
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 17:40:24 -0500
From: "Gary S. Mackay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Modem sharing on Linux?
I was just at Best Buy and looking at the surprisingly large selection
of Linux related stuff on the shelf. One box interested me. It was the
PowerTools for RedHat and it mentioned something about modem pool admin
or some such thing. Is there some sort of modem sharing software for
Linux out there? Something that would allow me to put a GOOD modem in
the linux server and not have to put modems in each workstation would be
great! I'm already using diald/ipmasq/etc., I'm talking about actual
modem shareing where a software package on a workstation can use the
modem on the linux server as if it was it's own. (Like Netware connect
from Novell)
--
Edison Information Technologies
P.O. Box 554
Milan, OH 44846-0554
419.499.7040
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave D. Cawley)
Subject: Need Linux ERPCD for Annex3
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 99 22:33:34 GMT
I have an Annex3 terminal server and I haven't used it in ages. I now
have a use for it, but I only have hte Annex3 software for it. I need to get
the binaries for erpcd to run on my linux machine for it to boot off of.
I used to have it on disk somewhere, but have lost it in the two years
that the machine has been idle...can anyone help?
Thanks.
Dave
***************************************************************
Dave D. Cawley |
VertoNet.com |
Duryea, PA |
(717)451-4300 x104 |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
***************************************************************
URL => http://www.vertonet.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: help PPP script failing
Date: 11 Mar 1999 21:18:06 -0600
Flipper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I Have attempted for the last month or so to connect to my ISP.
: I Have tried several different scripts as well as 2 different modems.
: MY current scripts are below. My server is Bell Atlantic. Windowze 98
: Says that it is using PAP however a PAP login does not work either. I
: Contents of "BELL.CHAT"
: #!/bin/sh
: /usr/sbin/chat -t 30 "" ATZ OK ATDT7179400 CONNECT
Replace CONNECT with CONNECT '\d\c' to ward off potential problems.
Drop the -t 30 which defines a 30 second timeout, too short for some
ISPs - the default is 45 seconds which is more conservative.
: Contents of "Bell", or my dialer script
: pppd kdebug 7 /dev/modem 115200 connect '/root/bell.chat' \
: crtscts noipdefault defaultroute user flipper refuse-chap
Remove "kdebug 7" (very seldom is this needed and it makes the logs
hard to read) and replace it with the plain debug option. Add the pppd
option "asyncmap a0000". Check /dev/modem with "setserial /dev/modem",
you should see spd_vhi set as a "Flag". Check /dev/modem speed with
"stty < /dev/modem", you should see "speed 115200".
The setserial command should be in one of the /etc/rc.* files and
you need to add spd_vhi if the check above shows it's missing. Do
a one-time "stty 38400 < /dev/modem" if the speed was not 115200 in the
check above.
Look for PPP link negotiation messages in /var/log/debug or another file
in /var/log . Something I suggested may make things right but to make
better guesses more information is required. The only things I got from
the log you posted are that there is apparently a communication problem
(the fcs errors) and that PAP authentication seems to have failed.
If there are no PPP negotiation messages in a /var/log file then add
*.=debug /var/log/debug
to /etc/syslog.conf, do "echo -n > /var/log/debug" to create the debug
file, and then do " kill -HUP `pidof syslogd` ". Try "man syslog.conf"
for some enlightenment.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
* It _has_ to be */
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.admin,linux.admin.isp
From: Colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: hacked login (telnet)
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 22:27:17 -0500
Contents of hosts.deny
ALL:ALL
Contents of hosts.allow
in.telnetd: allowableip, allowableip, allowableip
or you can just put your entire subnet in the allow file
instead of individual ip addresses.
HTH
Colin
--
Why gain the world but lose your soul?
Wisdom is much better than silver and gold.
At some time, a luser drooled thusly...
}I want to allow telnet access to a Internet connected server;
}but *only* form the local LAN connected machines.
}Is this possible or not. I do not wish telnet access available
}via the Net at all.
}I have disabled most unnecessary services via the inetd.conf including
}the telnet deamon. I would re-enable it if I could limit it's authority
}via hosts.allow or hosts.deny - but how? Nothing I've tried does the trick.
}
}-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
}http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
}
}
------------------------------
From: "Serge Poirier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Win95 Group Policies
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 23:51:40 -0500
Hi folks,
I'm trying to implement group policies using the netlogon share with a
WIN05c client, Samba 2.0.3 server running on Slackware 3.6 linux.
I've implemented group policies before using a WinNT 4.0 PDC server
by doing the following.
1. Installing the policy editor on the Win95c client and importing
grouppol.reg into the registry by doing the following sequence.
Control Panel/Add Remove Programs/Windows Setup/Have Disk
/Browse/e:\admin\apptool\poledit\grouppol.inf
Selecting the Group Policies and Systems Policy Editor check boxes, and
clicking install.
2. I also had to make sure that my groups on the WINNT PDC were GLOBAL
groups.
3. I then proceeded to create/edit the config.pol file with the policies
for
the GLOBAL groups mentioned in step 2.
4. Placing the config.pol file in the netlogon share of the PDC.
I know the WIN95c client is reading the config.pol file because user
policies
work.
I also know my groups are defined correctly because my group logon scripts
are executing correctly.
The only thing I can think of is that my Win95c client doesn't see the
groups
as GLOBAL and thus ignores the policy.
Any ideas ?
Thanks in advance
/Serge
I've included the smb.conf file.
[global]
workgroup = CARTIER
case sensitive = no
printing = bsd
printcap name = /etc/printcap
load printers = yes
guest account = guest
domain logons = yes
logon script = %g.bat
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
browseable = no
read only = no
create mode = 0750
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/lpd
browseable = no
printable = yes
public = no
writable = no
create mode = 0700
[netlogon]
comment = Netlogon share for login scripts and config.pol file.
path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon
writable = yes
browseable = yes
public = yes
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Tuning the network in Linux
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:42:54 GMT
Here's a newbie question:
Solaris and AIX gives us commands such as "ndd" and "no" to
tune certain ip and tcp parameters for performance, such as the
default socket buffer size, amount of total RAM used for TCP/IP,
default listen queue sizes, etc.
How is this tuning done in Linux?
Dawson
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
