Linux-Networking Digest #503, Volume #10 Mon, 15 Mar 99 07:14:17 EST
Contents:
Re: Tuning the network in Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Tuning the network in Linux ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Sendmail 8.9.2 and nodns ?? (Frank Hahn)
dual 128k ISDN with a Motorola Bitsurfr Pro EZ ("moses")
Re: HAVE I BEEN CRACKED? (Pieter Krul)
Re: EtherNet Card Problems (M. Buchenrieder)
Re: LAN and PPP Don't like one another (M. Buchenrieder)
does Linux autofs have -hosts option? (Georg Schwarz)
DHCP client and Kernel 2.2.3 (Jim Ewing)
Transparent Proxy for Cable Modem ("Linux Newbie")
Re: For all you Microsoft lovers (now about security) (John R. Campbell)
How to do network traffic accounting ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: HAVE I BEEN CRACKED? (M. Buchenrieder)
outgoing nettraffic (upb5)
Re: Kernel 2.2.1 with ipfwadm problem, please help ! (Daniel Bruce)
Re: Write permisions on Directories created through Samba ("Marco")
No email-connection with SuSE 6.0 (2.0.36) ("V.Monheim")
Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help (Don Baccus)
Using ISDN to configure operator services. ("Steven Kroesbergen")
Re: Linux programming jobs? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tuning the network in Linux
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 10:49:49 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a newbie question:
>
> Solaris and AIX gives us commands such as "ndd" and "no" to
> tune certain ip and tcp parameters for performance, such as the
> default socket buffer size, amount of total RAM used for TCP/IP,
> default listen queue sizes, etc.
>
> How is this tuning done in Linux?
>
> Dawson
>
>
You can use echo to patch directly into /proc.
Moshe Bar
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tuning the network in Linux
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 10:49:50 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a newbie question:
>
> Solaris and AIX gives us commands such as "ndd" and "no" to
> tune certain ip and tcp parameters for performance, such as the
> default socket buffer size, amount of total RAM used for TCP/IP,
> default listen queue sizes, etc.
>
> How is this tuning done in Linux?
>
> Dawson
>
>
You can use echo to patch directly into /proc.
Moshe Bar
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.9.2 and nodns ??
Date: 15 Mar 1999 11:05:37 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:09:27 GMT, Frank Luedke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have a UUCP-system with an dial-on-demand, and now I
> upgraded to sendmail 8.9.2 (it was time - the version
> before was 8.8.5).
>
> Now the "FEATURE(nodns)" does not exist anymore, sendmail
> told me that I should use the file /etc/service.switch
> to avoid dns checking, when I send an email via uucp.
>
> But I haven't found any informations how to build such a
> service.switch file nor any examples. And in the
> FAQ (Q3.22) there is just the hint, that I have to
> use the service.switch file to avoid DNS checking, but
> no sight of how to create such a file.
>
Well, I searched http://www.dejanews.com for the words dns, sendmail,
and service, and found how to do this.
In your .mc file, insert the following:
define(`confSERVICE_SWITCH_FILE', `/etc/service.switch')
Create a /etc/service.switch file with something like this:
aliases files
passwd files
hosts files
I don't know how far back the dejanews archives go, but there is a
lot of information out there for people to use.
--
Frank Hahn
------------------------------
From: "moses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dual 128k ISDN with a Motorola Bitsurfr Pro EZ
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 05:10:16 -0600
Okay so far I've gotten on using a simple dialup script that someone sent
me.. The modem will however only use one channel.. every time i try to add
the second number, it won't even dial. I've been told with this particular
modem that i need to do a ATD<number>&<number>. In windows i simple have to
put an "&4" (4 being the last number in the 128k line). Can anyone out
there help me please!?!?!!?
Thanks,
Mark Pena
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pieter Krul)
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix
Subject: Re: HAVE I BEEN CRACKED?
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 11:15:45 GMT
Pavel Kraus wrote to comp.security.unix about
> Reggie wrote:
> >
> > I checked my logs today as I do everyday and the old logs have been
> > renamed with a ".1" extension and the new logs are empty. Is this
> > evidence of a security breach, or was it caused by a normal process.
> >
>
> I don't know how it is on linuxes (I assume you are running one) but it
> might be some sort of automatic log rotating. For example BSDI's do it.
As far as I can see you're right, this is done once a week, on Sunday.
`man logrotate` should do the trick.
51704 Mar 15 11:53 messages
36348 Mar 14 03:53 messages.1.gz
20001 Mar 7 03:51 messages.2.gz
29308 Feb 28 03:59 messages.3.gz
17572 Feb 21 03:34 messages.4.gz
(Note that I let logrotate compress files)
Pieter
------------------------------
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.questions
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: EtherNet Card Problems
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:25:04 GMT
"destiny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> eth0: Interrupted while Interrupts are masked! isr0x0 imr 0x0
>My current setup is an AMD K6 233 CPU with 128M ram.
>eth0 is a Linksys EtherPCI LAN Card II at irq 5, io 6100
^^^^^
>eth1 is a 3Com 3C905B (PCI) at irq 5, io 6000
^^^^^
[...]
Put one of them onto a different IRQ and try again. While the PCI
architecture allows proper IRQ sharing , not all the Linux
drivers do as well.
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: LAN and PPP Don't like one another
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 09:06:40 GMT
Thomas Lepkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Can somebody please help me with having a working ppp connection while
>at the same time have my LAN activated?
>I must deactivate ethx in order to first connect to URLs. The same
>happens to my LAN, if ppp is activated, I can't see, or move files
>to computers on the LAN.
>What should I do to make ppp and ethx like one another?
Add proper routing tables. The default route must be adjusted
whenever the ppp0 link has been established.
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Georg Schwarz)
Subject: does Linux autofs have -hosts option?
Date: 15 Mar 1999 10:35:06 GMT
Does Linux autofs have a -hosts option similar to Solaris, or do I have to
use amd for such purposes?
--
Georg Schwarz ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], PGP 2.6ui)
Institut f�r Theoretische Physik +49 30 314-24254 FAX -21130 IRC kuroi
Technische Universit�t Berlin http://home.pages.de/~schwarz/
------------------------------
From: Jim Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: DHCP client and Kernel 2.2.3
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 10:59:25 +0000
I recently installed Kernel 2.2.3 over a (RedHat 5.1) 2.0.35-1 kernel. It all
worked OK with the exception that the DHCP client failed to initialise my
(3C509) ethernet card. The DHCP worked fine on the older kernel.
Do I need a later revision of the DHCP client? If so where do I find it (I
looked in sunsite.unc.edu as suggested by DHCP mini HOWTO but the latest
release was for a kernel earlier than mine)?
Has anyone seen the problem before?
Am I doing something stupid in trying to install Kernel 2.2.3 over a RedHat
installation (I am new to Linux)?
Regards,
------------------------------
From: "Linux Newbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Transparent Proxy for Cable Modem
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 19:53:01 GMT
Greetings
I am attempting to set up my cable modem with Linux. 2-way cable is not
available in my area so I use the modem to send data back up the pipe. With
Win9x and NT, this "just worked;" I dialed in, entered user data, and
whammo, downloading at 400-500k/sec. I don't know if it will be that way
with Linux.
I tried to set up PPP. The modem dials, connects, enters my username and
password, and starts blinking. However, when I try to ping any server
outside my network, I get "network is unreachable." Any ideas?
Once I get a straight dialup to work, will I need to do anything special to
get Linux to send the data via my modem and receive via one of the ethernet
cards?
Once this happens, how difficult will it be to set up a transparent proxy
(IP masquerading?) so that the other workstations on the network (all Win9x
and NT Pentium II's and III's) can get out to the 'net without configuring
proxy settings? Would someone be so incredibly kind as to outline a type of
procedure to follow for a totally new-to-Linux person, or point out a
similar guide to me?
Thanks for any information!!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John R. Campbell)
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Microsoft lovers (now about security)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 11:28:04 GMT
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999 20:44:24 GMT, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>doole writes:
>>Rufus V. Smith writes:
>>>The point is that sometimes innocent people need their privacy.
>> From Authorities? Why??
>
>"Authorities" with a capital "A", eh? Who do you think these "Authorities"
>are, God? Why should the fact that someone is employed by one of those
>organizations that you label an "Authority" give him the right to read my
>private files?
Perhaps, if there is no need for *any* form of privacy, we
should all send our messages via postcard, using the most
efficiently OCR'd font possible, so that the "Authorities"
know that we're knuckling under.
As for "Authorities", who do you trust? All organizations
that *I* know of are composed of human beings. If any of
them took an interest in me I would not like to have all of
my life open for examination...
Remember what McCarthy taught us all in the fifties- even
someone with a "clean" record can have it mis-interpreted
and twisted to suit an "Authorities" goals.
The Bill of Rights in the US isn't just a good idea- It's
the law (all of which are threatening to the "Powers that Be"
which explains why they are all threatened).
As for Linux, it'd be interesting to have a physical key (like
a PCMCIA slot in the front panel) for a PGP decryptor card so
that we can have encrypted filesystems, though I'd be concerned
that such a device can be "spoofed" (though an Open Source
environment is much like a "free society"- I can protect others
because I'm protecting myself).
Now...
Have I muddied the waters enough?
--
John R. Campbell Speaker to Machines [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- As a SysAdmin, yes, I CAN read your e-mail, but I DON'T get that bored!
Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are those of John Campbell alone and
do not reflect the opinions of his employer(s) or lackeys
thereof. Anyone who says differently is itching for a fight!
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to do network traffic accounting
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 11:19:15 GMT
Hello,
how to do network traffic accounting using linux. Esp. I'm interested in a
listing of how many ingoing and outgoing bytes have been transfered containing
source and destination information.
Andreas
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.security.unix
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: HAVE I BEEN CRACKED?
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 08:40:18 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Beiter) writes:
>Ok how about this one:
>secure:
>--------------------
>Mar 9 03:04:52 xioa in.telnetd[711]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>Mar 9 03:05:02 xioa ipop3d[712]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>Mar 9 03:05:03 xioa in.telnetd[713]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>Mar 9 03:45:29 xioa in.telnetd[716]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>Mar 9 03:45:36 xioa ipop3d[717]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>Mar 9 03:45:37 xioa in.telnetd[718]: connect from 200.36.5.140
>----------------------
You got what you deserved for running daemons without properly securing
them. Disable what you don't need to be explicitely running. Someone
scanned your ports for possible exploits. The IP address points to a
ISP in Mexico.
[...]
>Mar 9 04:02:02 xioa PAM_pwdb[759]: (su) session opened for user nobody by (uid=
>99)
>Mar 9 04:03:45 xioa PAM_pwdb[759]: (su) session closed for user nobody
>-------------------------------
>I was not up at this time. This looks like someone was able to log in and
>su sucessfully.
[...]
No.
man updatedb
man crontab
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: upb5 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: outgoing nettraffic
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 11:45:24 +0100
Hello !
I=B4m running a small LAN with an Linux-PC as Internet router with ISDN
and syncPPP.
The distribution is S.u.S.E-Linux 6.0.
I managed to setup the network, IP-masquerading and the ISDN-Hardware.
It works quite well, but I need to log the Telphone costs seperated by
client.
With isdnlog I can start a scrtipt on each cost-impulse delivered by the
telephone company, but I cannot see in this script which client is
responsible for that connection.
-How can I account the nettraffic from each client to the ippp0
interface seperatla (eg. with ipfwadm ? )
-Or do you know a completly different way to log the costs seperated by
client.
Thanks
Karl Georg Esser
========================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 22:23:38 -0800
From: Daniel Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.2.1 with ipfwadm problem, please help !
Update TWO!.
I correct myself. You CAN use ipfwadm! After installing ipchains they create a
wrapper shell script to emulate the program with ipchains. Probably not preferred
method, but it did work. I took out my lo:0 alias for my old OSPF addr and put the
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward in rc.inet1 before I do my ifconfig. now masq
'ing is good.
Good Luck!
Interestingly ipchains -L gives:
.
.
.
.
Chain IpFwAdM! (0 references):
target prot opt source destination ports
- all ------ anywhere anywhere n/a
- all ------ anywhere anywhere n/a
Daniel Bruce wrote:
> Update!
>
> Found a nice site and a good package with examples for using IPCHAINS as a
> router, firewall and masq'ing.
> Included opening the loopback interface, which I wasn't doing. I will try
> setting it up and let you know if I get it working.
>
> http://www.dislessici.org/products.html
>
> specifically -> http://www.dislessici.org/tools/ipchains-firewall-1.5.1.tar.gz
>
> Daniel Bruce wrote:
>
> > 1. Get kernel 2.2.3
> > 2. Get IPCHAINS (Latest 1.3.8?) (ipfwadm only works on 2.0 kernels).
> > http://www.rustcorp.com/linux/ipchains/
> > 3. Really! read the /usr/src/linux/documentation/Changes file.
> >
> > 4. Use more recent hardware. On old system the NIC's would not work at all.
> > (had ISA PnP 3COM and EEPRO100B PCI). New system using 2 EE100ProB PCI and 2.2.3
> > loves'em.
> >
> > I still can't get Masq'ing to work on 2.2.3.
> >
> > My problem:
> >
> > Recently upgraded to Slakware 3.60 with 2.0.36 kernel and latest libs and
> > utils. Everything is peachy! Off with the old, all my goodies recomipled and
> > working great even old SATAN. (Need newer version of sniffit and/or tcpdump that
> > works! old versions won't recompile).
> >
> > 2.2.3 problems:
> >
> > 1. I had routing software Gated before. Now 2.2.3 kernel now has ospf
> > support. and picks up my psuedo OSPF1.dom. (Bad). Seems to be confused as to the
> > inside domain (I am multi-homed multi-domained three-way one dom inside, two
> > dom outside). I will try to drop the psuedo for the testing and see if that
> > helps. I am not using ospf anymore anyway.
> > 2. gated won't run on 2.2.3 (even after recompile) (R3.6A2) (Bad). Gated
> > people require snail mail registration before they let you in to there download
> > area and I am lazy
> > 3. Server can talk to all hosts inside and outside. (good)
> > 4. Inside Hosts cannot talk to Server. (packets to server go to bit bucket,
> > firewalling works well, sort of!) this is Bad.
> >
> > It seems like doing echo 1 > /proc/sys/net4/ipv4/ip_forward does not seem to
> > do anything after ifconfig. But things are so messed up by then ... well who
> > cares anymore.
> >
> > This is part of my script to give an idea.
> >
> > /sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 172.16.3.1/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0 -p all -l
> > #echo ' diplaying curreent masq'
> > /sbin/ipchains -M -L
> > echo ' diplaying all'
> > /sbin/ipchains -L
> >
> > Hope that help a little. So close yet so far....
> >
> > Bigboss wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I am running Kernel 2.0.35 with IP-Masq. and everything is working fine.
> > >
> > > When I upgrade my kernel to 2.2.1 (hopefully its stable :) and when I use
> > > ipfwadm for IP-Masq. such as
> > >
> > > ipfwadm -F -p deny
> > >
> > > I got this message
> > >
> > > ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Invalid argument
> > >
> > > I also notice, something when I compile the kernel 2.2.1 is, there is new
> > > option Linux Socket Filtering ? I dont pretend to know anything about it but
> > > from the sounds of it, I enable it !! Is it the right thing to do ? or Is
> > > there anything else ?
> > >
> > > Thanks for all the comments.
> > >
> > > Ayewin
> >
> > --
> > * --------------------------------------------------- *
> > * Daniel Bruce - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > * http://www.mygen.com
> > * P.O. Box 7167 , Tahoe City Ca. 96145
> > * --------------------------------------------------- *
>
> --
> * --------------------------------------------------- *
> * Daniel Bruce - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> * http://www.mygen.com
> * P.O. Box 7167 , Tahoe City Ca. 96145
> * --------------------------------------------------- *
--
* --------------------------------------------------- *
* Daniel Bruce - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* http://www.mygen.com
* P.O. Box 7167 , Tahoe City Ca. 96145
* --------------------------------------------------- *
------------------------------
From: "Marco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Write permisions on Directories created through Samba
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 12:39:56 +0100
Or try in smb.conf: force create mode = 0777
Marco
Curtis Adams schrieb in Nachricht <7c3u8n$gor$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I've setup Samba on my Linux machine and have shared drives. When I create
>files on the Linux machine via a Windows95 workstation, the >
>
------------------------------
From: "V.Monheim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: No email-connection with SuSE 6.0 (2.0.36)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 12:48:42 +0100
I can't get the right settings for E-Mail-connection with SuSE 6.0
(german), using Kernel 2.0.36.
I think, there must be a fault in my settings of any network config, but
I can't get any hint.
On my system, I use AVM Fritz! PnP-ISDNCard
(it's configured fine: using www-connection with KDE or Netscape 4.5
works great), I4L-packages are installed, SuSE-PPP as well...
Trying to ask my ISP for EMail, e.g. Netscape stops with the message "a
network error occurred: unable to connect to server (tcp error: no route
to host) ..."
In YaST, I just configured "nameserver" etc.. Can't find, what's wrong
by now.
Can anyone suggest, what's to do??
Thanks a lot!!
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.ps.linux.hardware,alt.os.linux
Subject: Re: IP Masqurading? Please Help
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Baccus)
Date: 14 Mar 1999 06:33:11 PST
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Glenn Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Wrong wrong wrong.
>Linux kernels do not come with everything installed.
>Anyone who's going to learn unix ( sorry linux ) had better as hell
>learn a little about c code and compiling the damd kernel.
Sorry, but my RH 5.2 came with masquerading installed, I
just had to load a few modules to get ip masq working with
ftp and a few other protocols. But the basic masquerading
was there, just a couple of ipfwadm commands and you're
up and running (presuming your NICs, or NIC/ppp combination,
are configured).
>If they don't we're going to end up with a mess of windows 95
>users all over again.
>Linux ISN'T easy to learn. It's still under development and
>isn't something I'de suggest would be ( sorry ) plug and play.
>Let them learn ! Let and make them learn how to compile a darn kernakl,
>and let them have to re - install 15 billion times untill they get it
>right.
What an asshole.
>I had to.. and very few people took any pitty on me what so ever when
>I was learning this O/s five years ago.
I did too - in 1974, on a PDP-11 (original Unix, not Linux, same
notion, though).
I see no reason why, 25 years later, one should WANT everyone
else to go through that learning curve. The easier it is made
to install and configure linux, the better it is for everyone.
This sounds like one of those "I had to walk twenty miles to
school each morning, so I'm not going to let you take the
school bus!" type arguments.
--
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nature photos, on-line guides, at http://donb.photo.net
------------------------------
From: "Steven Kroesbergen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Using ISDN to configure operator services.
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 12:46:15 +0100
Hello,
Does anyone know if it is possible to configure operator services like call
diversion from a linux machines that has an ISDN adapter installed ?
(This way, I could configure call diversions remotely)
Thx.
Steven
steven at knd dot nl
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Re: Linux programming jobs?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 12:01:36 GMT
Glen Wiley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Have you looked at the HUGE number of UNIX only jobs in the US. There
>is a severe shortage of engineers that can work with UNIX but can't
>spell Microsoft.
Darn! My superior education trips me up again. Oh, if only I had never
learned how to spell Macrosoft! Uhm, that Mircosoft. I mean Microfrost.
Damn, Miocrosft.
Well, anyway --- how do those jobs pay?
Bernie
--
============================================================================
"It's a magical world, Hobbes ol' buddy...
...let's go exploring"
Calvin's final words, on December 31st, 1995
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
