Linux-Networking Digest #540, Volume #10 Thu, 18 Mar 99 14:13:50 EST
Contents:
Re: does linux support sever-client features (Erik Hensema)
Network shuts down on a regular basis (dude)
Re: I need help setting up networking with redhat 5.0 ("Chris Cantwell")
Help - "private" ip address conflict using ip masq. ("David M. Reed")
Re: Strange Win98-Linux networking problem ("Chris Cantwell")
Re: Problem mailing with direct connect computers (Erik Hensema)
red hat linux 5.1 firewall problem ("wai tsang")
Re: Redhat 5.1 - Can't ping outside box (John Strange)
dhcp (Lord Spurius)
eisa tokenring card support ("Terry East")
Re: connection but can't ping (John McKee)
eth0 helpppp (Julio Olivares)
Re: Samba & NTFS-File-System NT4.0 ("Terry East")
Re: Fetchmail timeouts (Nik Jewell)
Re: Sherlook failure over netatalk volumens (Heiko Hellweg)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers (Don Baccus)
Re: Frontpage and ASP under linux? ("The Lone Scribe")
PPP and kernel 2.2.3 ("Michael Okun")
Re: Help! Cant route WIN98 through Linux box! (Lew Pitcher)
Secure NFS ?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Hensema)
Subject: Re: does linux support sever-client features
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 16:03:56 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Is it possible to have clients connected to server? if possible, what are the
>requirements? Can files be transferred between them?
No, Linux is a standalone server, it completely doensn't support any clients
connected to the box.
Obviously clueless...
--
Erik Hensema ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: dude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Network shuts down on a regular basis
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 14:59:08 GMT
Hi there. I just finished setting up a linux box, acting as a gateway for a
small LAN (plus doing several other small services) and everything went
smoothly and without pain. Except for a very peculiar problem: Every 2 hours
or so, all network connections are broken, both intra- and internet, no
pings, no routes, no nothing. Most of the time the network kicks in after ca.
5-8 minutes. Twice I've had to restart inetd, and once routed. I don't know
if there's a connection here, but when I look at /var/log/messages, I see a
cluster of error messages appearing every 8-10 minutes: Mar 18 14:35:40
picard inetd[7230]: linuxconf/tcp: bind: Address already in use Mar 18
14:35:40 picard inetd[7230]: auth/tcp: bind: Address already in use Mar 18
14:35:40 picard inetd[7230]: time/tcp: bind: Address already in use
...followed by identical messages for each tcp service; finger,imap, pop,
shell, telnet, etc.
I'm running RedHat 5.2 (2.0.36) on a compaq prosignia 200 (nics eth0:TLan,
eth1: 3c905b)
I'm completely stuck and utterly baffled.
Any suggestions, tips, hints, ideas, places_to_look_for_error_messages,
solutions, pizzaz, or well, just anything to get me started would be SO
greatly appreciated.
My opinions are my own, and have nothing to do with my employer.
If God had wanted Man to be multitasking,
He would have given him two hands.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Chris Cantwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I need help setting up networking with redhat 5.0
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 09:29:18 -0500
Use the Intel SoftSet2 (DOS) utility to set the IO address and irq, disable
Plug and Play (important!)
Put the appropriate settings in conf.modules
alias eth0 eepro
options eepro io=0x000 irq=x (Use your settings here)
network settings are in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 (Redhat)
load eepro driver:
# insmod eepro
bring ethernet up:
# ifup eth0
Read the NET-3-HOWTO and the modules HOWTO.
Chris Cantwell
Blake Follett ( NT4HELP) wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I am having trouble setting up the network with my intel ether express
>pro 10+ ISA NIC card, how does one go about doing this, I have a clean
>full install on my PC and have no clue what to do to get the network
>working for me. I have read alot of docs about it and can not seem to
>get it working.
>
>Please email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>I guess I need step by step instructions.
------------------------------
From: "David M. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help - "private" ip address conflict using ip masq.
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 14:46:58 -0700
I have ip masq. set up and working on Red Hat 5.2, with a TCI @Home cable
connection, with dhcp configured and working. I can get to the outside just
fine
from all the machines on my network (192.168.1.x).
The problem -
I was surfing the web when my NT machine kicked off the network with a
message
that it had detected a conflicting IP address on the network. My Linux box
is on
192.168.1.1 on one NIC for internal, and a dhcp assigned address on a 2nd
NIC for
my cable access, with my NT system at 192.168.1.2. The 192.168.1.x addresses
should not be getting out past my Linux box. When I rebooted, I tried to
telnet to my
Linux box, and instead connected to someone else's FreeBSD system.� Finally
it all
came back after powering off NT and restarted. I imagine there is a
frustrated FreeBSD
user out there as well! So, why are the "private" addresses getting to the
outside world,
where they can conflict?
I am using the following firewall rules:
ipfwadm -F -p deny
ipfwadm -F -a accept -m -S 192.168.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
Thanks.
David Reed
------------------------------
From: "Chris Cantwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Strange Win98-Linux networking problem
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:49:51 -0500
Try setting the ethernet cards up explicitly for 100Mbps/Full Duplex. If
that doesn't work try 100/half duplex, or 10/half duplex. The
autonegotiation may be hanging your network.
Chris Cantwell
Andy Birkett wrote in message
<3zAh$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>In article <7cdbt9$6ir$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, etienne6302@my-
>dejanews.com writes
>>Hi everyone,
>>
>>I'm having big problems getting my linux box to communicate with my Win98
>>machine through a crossover UTP cable. I know the hardware works because I
>>managed to connect the machines successfully with both of them running
>>Windows, but I had no luck in configuring the network with Linux. My setup
is
>>the following
>>
>>Win98 :
>>D-Link DFE-530TX 10/100 NIC
>>Adapter settings:
>>Connection Type= Autosense
>>DMA Burst Length=256 DWORDS
>>Recieve Buffers=64
>>Recieve Threshold=1024 bytes
>>Transmit Buffers=4
>>Transmit Threshold=1024 bytes
>>TCP/IP settings :
>>IP : 10.0.2.254, Netmask 255.0.0.0 (No gatway, no DNS, no WINS)
>>
>>Linux :
>>Kernel v. 2.0.34
>>NICs : RealTek RTL8139(clone) or Cnet Pro-120 (having a Macronix 98715
PMAC
>>chip)
>>I tried both the above cards with no success.
>>
>>Here are dumps of the various setings :
>>
>>network driver message at bootup
>>--------------------------------
>>...
>>VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
>>Adding Swap: 130744k swap-space (priority -1)
>>rtl8139.c:v0.99B 4/7/98 Donald Becker
>>http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/rtl8139.html
>>eth0: RealTek RTL8139 at 0x6100, IRQ 11, 00:20:18:89:c3:e9.
>>eth0: Switching to full-duplex based on link partner ability of 05e1.
>>...
>>
>>cat /proc/pci
>>-------------
>>PCI devices found:
>> Bus 0, device 10, function 0:
>> VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. Trio32/Trio64 (rev 0).
>> Medium devsel. IRQ 9.
>> Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe0000000.
>> Bus 0, device 9, function 0:
>> Ethernet controller: Realtek 8139 (rev 16).
>> Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. IRQ 11. Master Capable.
>>Latency=32. Min Gnt=32.Max Lat=64.
>> I/O at 0x6100.
>> Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe0800000.
>> Bus 0, device 7, function 1:
>> IDE interface: Intel 82371SB PIIX3 IDE (rev 0).
>> Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. Master Capable.
Latency=32.
>> I/O at 0x9000.
>> Bus 0, device 7, function 0:
>> ISA bridge: Intel 82371SB PIIX3 ISA (rev 1).
>> Medium devsel. Fast back-to-back capable. Master Capable. No
bursts.
>> Bus 0, device 0, function 0:
>> Host bridge: Intel 82437VX Triton II (rev 1).
>> Medium devsel. Master Capable. Latency=32.
>>
>>cat /proc/net/dev
>>-----------------
>>Inter-| Receive | Transmit
>> face |packets errs drop fifo frame|packets errs drop fifo colls carrier
>> lo: 31 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 0 0 0
>> nr0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> nr1: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> nr2: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> nr3: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>> eth0: 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0
>>
>>ifconfig output
>>---------------
>>lo Link encap:Local Loopback
>> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
>> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
>> RX packets:31 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
>> TX packets:31 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
>>
>>eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:20:18:89:C3:E9
>> inet addr:10.0.2.253 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
>> TX packets:9 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
>> Interrupt:11 Base address:0x6100
>>
>>route output
>>------------
>>Kernel IP routing table
>>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
>>loopback * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1 lo
>>10.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 1
eth0
>>default 10.0.2.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
>>
>>The symptoms are simple. Nothing seems to be passing between the two
>>computers either way. I cannot ping from Linux to Win or vice versa. The
fact
>>that I tried two different NICs with the same results seems to suggest
that
>>there is something wrong with my interface settings but for the life of me
I
>>can't figure out what. Another possiblility is perhaps that the culprit is
>>the crossover cable. I don't know though, because as I've said above, it
>>works fine when both machines are running Win95/98. An interesting thing
is
>>that ifconfig insists on labelling eth0 as a 10Mbps Ethernet even though
both
>>NICs are 100Mbps.
>>
>>I'm no network guru, although I've had occasion in the past to set up
various
>>networks both
>>with and without Linux but I've never had so many problems setting a
network
>>up. Please, if
>>anyone knows what I'm doing wrong, help me!
>>
>>Please contact me at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>Etienne
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Hensema)
Subject: Re: Problem mailing with direct connect computers
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 16:35:39 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mike ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>I set up two computers with a serial null modem cable and
>have ppp runnning on both. I used the command line:
>I can telnet and ftp between both computers and have also
>mounted directories remotely, but I can't send e-mail between
>each computer. I am using Pine. I can e-mail to different users
>within the same computer, but not between them. Talk won't work
>either.
> What are the issues as to why I can't do the e-mail?
Probably dns issues.
Make a /etc/service.switch:
---
hosts files
aliases files
---
To prevent sendmail from doing dns queries. Also, make sure that
/etc/host.conf reads "order hosts,bind"
If this doesn't work, try debugging the setup:
kill sendmail, and start it with "sendmail -dD -os -d"
On the other machine, "telnet <remote> smtp"
sendmail should present itself with a message.
"helo <myhost>"
"mail from: <name>@<myhost>"
"rcpt to: <name>@otherhost>"
"data"
"bla bla
------------------------------
From: "wai tsang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: red hat linux 5.1 firewall problem
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 18:09:44 -0000
wonder if you can shed light on this thing that has baffled me for a week or
so now
on setting up a firewall
I have a linux boc with 2 nics
both are 3c905s
one has address 59.101.27.12
the other 32.130.204.234
now I have plugged them into a hub separating 2 networks
on the 32.*.* side i can ping everything on the 59.*.* side
but on the 59.*.* side all I can ping is 32.130.204.234
I can ping both sides of the network on the firewall box itself
ip forwarding is enabled
what am I doing wrong?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Strange)
Subject: Re: Redhat 5.1 - Can't ping outside box
Date: 18 Mar 1999 18:10:42 GMT
To add a default route
route add default gw your_ip_address_here metric 1
to see if it works.
new tulip driver location
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html
I am user the test driver.
StMonBoy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Okay, I recently set up a Redhat 5.1 box to play with. I have an NDC
: (Sohoware) network card in it. It uses a Matronix chip, so when I installed
: Redhat I configured it to use the tulip drivers.
: All seems well but I can't ping to my other Win98 boxes on the network. I can
: ping to my Redhat box itself.
: I went to Redhat's site and searched the Faq-o-matic thing and pulled up the
: "Can't ping outside" FAQ.
: Running ifconfig -a I see that my network card is indeed configured.
: Then I ran netstat -r. The FAQ said that if the "default route doesn't show up
: or has the wrong IP address, you may need to make changes to your setup."
: Okay, the default route doesn't show up for me. So what "changes" to I make to
: my setup?
: Thanks!
: Steven Mon
--
While Alcatel may claim ownership of all my ideas (on or off the job),
Alcatel does not claim any responsibility for them. Warranty expired when u
opened this article and I will not be responsible for its contents or use.
------------------------------
From: Lord Spurius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dhcp
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 11:02:39 -0500
I have a dhcp hang on bootup using redhat 5.2
I've never messed with altering what happens at boot before and don't
know how
I don't want dhcp spawned at boot; its trying to spawn before my pcmcia
card is detected anyways
- Spurius
------------------------------
From: "Terry East" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: eisa tokenring card support
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 17:46:12 +0200
Hi All
Does anyone know how I might get support for for a madge smart eisa token
ring card.
I have an old compaq eisa machine which I am not able to make any hardware
changes to, but it would make a perfect linux server if I were able to
access the network with it.
The default token ring driver for redhat5.2 does not recognise the card at
all.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Terry
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John McKee)
Subject: Re: connection but can't ping
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 18:26:26 GMT
I've just been through a similar situation, and my problem was that my default routing
was to my
internal lan (eth0) instead of to ppp0. What I did was "/sbin/route del default" to
remove the
default route, and the next time I connected, I was looking at the net.
HTH,
On 18 Mar 1999 16:57:35 GMT, "R. Honig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED][remove this]> wrote:
>Hello, i have a problem with my internet connection on my RedHat Linux 5.1
>box. This is the problem: i can't ping any address(IP or symbolic) not even
>my DNS server. I looked for the answer in PPP-HOWTO, PPP-TIPS, RedHat
>PPP-maillist, but I can't find it.
>
>This is how I connect:
>minicom
> atdt<ISP#>
> <USER>
> <PASS>
> <CHOOSE PPP>
> <alt q>
>pppd -d -detach /dev/ttyS1 115200 &
>
>route -n looks fine (compared with the PPP-HOWTO, except instead of
>"default" there was 0.0.0.0)
>ifconfig looks good (almost the same as in the PPP-HOWTO)
>
>BUT, when I order "ping <DNS>", the only thing replied is the first line
>and that's it. When I press ctl-c it says "14 sent packets 0 recieved 100%
>lost".
>
>resolv.conf:
>search
>nameserver <DNS>
>nameserver <DNS2>
>
>host.conf:
>same as in PPP-HOWTO
>
>My questions are:
>- in what file are things logged(pppd)?
>- does anyone know how to solve this problem?
>
>Thank you for your help.
John McKee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Julio Olivares <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: eth0 helpppp
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 18:20:34 +0000
Hi
I have 2 PC's with rh5.2 connected by lan cards.
Until today, everything was ok, but I nstalled Samba and the samba
server gives the following msg eact time I try to access the other Pc:
trigger_send() - Called with the transmiter busy
I've removed Samba but te problem persits.
When the client pc try to ping the server, he get no reponse.
Can you help me ?
Thank's in advance.
--
Julio Manuel Olivares
Praceta Sao Joao Batista
N. 3 - 3Dt.
2735 Cacem
PORTUGAL
0931 7 30 20 30
------------------------------
From: "Terry East" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba & NTFS-File-System NT4.0
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 18:16:06 +0200
Linux talks to netbios shares through samba only. The easiest way I found to
setup the connection from the linux box to an NT workstation was using
webmin , an awesome remote http based linux administration package.
You can find it at http://webmin.www-master.com
Karl-Heinz Lintz wrote in message <7cpoeb$gkt$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello users!
>
>I work with S.U.S.E 6.0 and Samba on a Linux - SMP- machine and would like
>to connect to a Win NT 4.0 Client with NTFS-File system.
>I translated my kernel 2.036 with hpfs (OS/2) and other filesystems -
>support.
>Is it possibility to connect to NTFS-File - system to the NT 4.0
workstation
>with it - because i cannot get a connect to the drives there.
>ping is working well to the NT-client.
>
>thanks a lot for helping out!
>
>MFG
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nik Jewell)
Subject: Re: Fetchmail timeouts
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 15:48:52 +0000 (GMT)
Here are the details:
fetchmail -V reports:
This is fetchmail release 4.5.8
Linux jnana.demon.co.uk 2.2.3 #1 Tue Mar 16 19:36:58 GMT 1999 i586 unknown
Taking options from command line and /home/nik/.fetchmailrc Idfile is
/home/nik/.fetchids Fetchmail will forward misaddressed multidrop messages to
nik.
Options for retrieving from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
True name of server is pop3.demon.co.uk.
Protocol is POP3.
Server nonresponse timeout is 300 seconds.
Default mailbox selected.
Only new messages will be retrieved (--all off).
Fetched messages will not be kept on the server (--keep off).
Old messages will not be flushed before message retrieval (--flush off).
Rewrite of server-local addresses is enabled (--norewrite off).
Carriage-return stripping is disabled (stripcr off).
Carriage-return forcing is disabled (forcecr off).
Interpretation of Content-Transfer-Encoding is enabled (pass8bits off).
MIME decoding is disabled (mimedecode off).
Nonempty Status lines will be kept (dropstatus off)
Messages will be SMTP-forwarded to: localhost (default) Recognized listener
spam block responses are: 571 550 501 Single-drop mode: 1 local name(s)
recognized.
No UIDs saved from this host.
fetchmail -v reports:
fetchmail: 4.5.8 querying pop3.demon.co.uk (protocol POP3) at Thu Mar 18
11:28:12 1999 fetchmail: POP3< +OK demon POP3 server ready (demon.co.uk)
fetchmail: POP3> USER jnana
fetchmail: POP3< +OK
fetchmail: POP3> PASS *
fetchmail: POP3< +OK
fetchmail: selecting or re-polling default folder
fetchmail: POP3> STAT
fetchmail: POP3< +OK 1 3352
fetchmail: POP3> LAST
fetchmail: POP3< +OK 0
fetchmail: POP3> LIST
fetchmail: POP3< +OK 1 message
fetchmail: POP3< 1 3352
fetchmail: POP3< .
1 message for jnana at pop3.demon.co.uk (3352 bytes).
fetchmail: POP3> TOP 1 99999999
fetchmail: POP3< +OK
reading message 1 of 1 (3352 bytes)
fetchmail: timeout after -1073742792 seconds waiting for listener to respond.
fetchmail: client/server synchronization error while fetching from
pop3.demon.co.uk
fetchmail: Query status=7
Obviously, the timeout figure is bogus.
Thanks again for your interest
Nik
------------------------------
From: Heiko Hellweg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sherlook failure over netatalk volumens
Date: 18 Mar 1999 17:18:15 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
> the files are shows in the windows correctly but, if you try to click in some
> of then to see the path or to open it, the client say something like "It was
> not possible to open the file because the file isn't there, maybe some one
> have delete it". In this moment sherlook put the file like 'not accessible'
> changing the color name to gray.
maybe these files have names longer than 32 characters? i sometimes
see strange effects files with very long names are put volumes that
are evported via appleShare. the seem to only have the first 32 chars when
you see them from the apple client.
i can e.g. see them in the finder and sometimes even move them to other
folders, i am however never able to delete such a file with a crippled name
bye - heiko
--
============================ Heiko Hellweg ===========================
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~hellweg/
10% of our customers account for 90% of our service cost: those who
actually use our product, plus the ones who were injured unpacking it.
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Baccus)
Date: 18 Mar 1999 10:45:19 PST
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, doole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If you need YOUR privacy, then go ahead and fight for it. That's fine,
>I'm just curious about folk's thoughts on it.
>My fault, I know, but I still don't quite get the jist.
Well, you might consider than in the United States, yes,
our own little country, people have been denied jobs,
persecuted, and in other ways harassed FOR PERFECTLY
LEGAL BEHAVIOR.
Even in your stating that you do nothing in private
that you would mind having exposed "except for things
like sex", you are stating that to some degree
privacy is important to you.
Because, as I'm sure you're aware, in some states
certain types of sex - things less kinky than occured
recently in the White House - are against the law,
even when conducted by a man and woman joined in
holy matrimony sactioned by the state.
So, buddy, you never know, if privacy rights disappear,
it might be YOUR back up against the wall.
Those who wrote our Constitution understood the world
better than you do, I'm afraid...
--
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nature photos, on-line guides, at http://donb.photo.net
------------------------------
From: "The Lone Scribe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Frontpage and ASP under linux?
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 07:55:45 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<7cq9qa$1gm$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Scribe, you must intend to live a monklike existence of deprivation and
>spiritual purity. In the real world, a place you seem not to have visited
>recently, ASP is not only the most scalable and versatile of web/database
>platforms, but the most profitably deployed
Yup, yup, yup, eat up that yummy M$ food. Bill tells you it's good for you
and so you eat it all up and lick the plate, and then ask for more. But in
'the real world', where it's not all about DeGates' vision of 'how things
really are', there are plenty of alternative and even highly superior
solutions that work much better than ASP without violating security and
privacy. Just because your 'real world' doesn't see that doesn't make your
'real world' the 'only real world'. And 'free' does not necessarily mean
inferior. Mebbe you need to skeddadle on back to the Micro$haft newsgroups,
sonny boy, and don't slurp your Starbucks so loudly. People are listening.
------------------------------
From: "Michael Okun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP and kernel 2.2.3
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 13:51:37 -0500
Hello everyone!
I've got a big problem, recently I have upgraded my perfectly working system
to the new kernel v2.2.3. I have uncompressed the files in /usr/src
directory and recompiled the kernel to include the support for SMP.
Everything works like a charm, EXCEPT PPP!!!!!.
>From now on, every time I try to initiate ppp connection, I would get an
error pppd died unexpectedly. I am using Caldera OL v1.3
Any comments would be greately appreciated.
Michael Okun.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: Help! Cant route WIN98 through Linux box!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 17:26:15 GMT
On Thu, 18 Mar 1999 07:56:21 -0600, "Michael Arnold"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Can someone out there help me? I cant seem to get my Windows 98 box to route
>through my Linux box via pppd. I have been to every howto page with
>absolutely no luck! My ppp is working fine! I can surf, send and receive
>mail etc.. I just can't get the Windows box to go outside the Linux box! I
>have my 98 box authenticating and logging into the Linux.That is all working
>fine an dandy. I am stuck! Any help would be great!
Have you...
* enabled IP Forwarding on your Linux system ?
* either obtained a public IP address for your Win98 system
or installed, configured, and enabled IP Masquerading on
your Linux system?
* set your Win98 default route to the Linux system?
Lew Pitcher
System Consultant, Development Services
Toronto Dominion Bank
(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employers')
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: Secure NFS ?
Date: 18 Mar 1999 17:28:37 GMT
Hi,
I'm looking for a secure replacement for NFS. It must work on i386 and alpha
Linux, and i need to share it in the local network with samba.
Any ideas?
--
KC
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
