Linux-Networking Digest #559, Volume #10 Fri, 19 Mar 99 16:14:41 EST
Contents:
Re: FUD ALERT! was Re: Frontpage and ASP under linux? ("Bob Bridger")
Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info** (Bill Anderson)
Re: Can't ping localhost(127.0.0.1) and own host name from Linuxbox ("Leopold
Toetsch")
Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info** ("Quantum
Leaper")
Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info** ("Rufus V.
Smith")
SAMBA: Enrypted Passwords (Jason McKnight)
Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers ("JR McConnell")
Re: LCP Timeout and 7 bit connection (Clifford Kite)
Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info** (Curt Steger)
Internet Service Providers (ISP) ("jerry")
Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info** (Greg
Gershowitz)
Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info** (Stuart R.
Fuller)
Re: installed nic not initilized (Jim Roberts)
by the way... ("Brent Cornwell, Pediatrics Computer Administrator")
Re: setting MTU and MRU ("George Csahanin")
Re: NFS and win98/linux ("Graham Wharton")
Re: How to compile Kernel 2.2.2 with redhat 5.2??? (root)
Re: ne.o & 3c509.o compiled ??? ("��d�W")
pam_rhosts_auth problem... (Steve Ginsberg)
Even innocent people need privacy ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Modem not responding ! (Laurent Martin)
Re: V.90 ISA Modems!?!?! (Andrew Comech)
Re: Setting up a NFS server (Olaf Meyer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Bob Bridger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: FUD ALERT! was Re: Frontpage and ASP under linux?
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 11:56:06 -0800
Bravo !
The Lone Scribe wrote in message <7cu8o3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Lee Sharp wrote in message ...
>> In The Real World (tm) Micro$oft customers pay people to run Micro$oft
>>products on That Internet Thing (tm) and you will proudly walk past it.
>
>Yadda yadda yadda. FUD, FUD, FUD. If it's a pissing contest you want, I'll
>bet I make more money doing UNIX programming than you do with your pissy
>little ASP. But that's not the real point here, is it? Look, I'm not
denying
>your right to play with those inferior M$ tools in your concept of 'the
real
>world'. It's a free country, and if you want to saddle yourself with an
>inferior, closed technology and ride that high horse off into the
Micro$haft
>sunset, that's your right. What I question is your deep-seated need to
>preach the Gospel of DeGates here in a Linux newsgroup. Why not go preach
to
>the choir over in the M$ newsgroups, or are you just itching for a fight?
>
>Or do you really, deep down inside, realize that Linux is superior after
>all?
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Bill Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.tcl,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info**
Date: 19 Mar 1999 20:01:52 GMT
Tim Roberts wrote:
>
> John Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Kano wrote:
> >>
> >> Oh come on. Many other standard devices (ethernet cards, for example)
> >> have their
> >> own unique serial numbers that software can use at will. Get over it.
> >>
> >
> >Yes - but ethernet mac cards are only broadcast over the lan, not over
> >the net (except by Office98, of course).
>
> The POINT here is that it is exactly as easy to embed my unique MAC address
> in an Internet transaction as it is to embed my unique Pentium-III CPU ID
> in an Internet transaction. Any software which will go to the trouble to
> fetch the unique CPU identifier and send it over the network to identify me
> could just as easily be written TODAY to use a MAC address for exactly the
> same purpose. The CPU identifier is not significantly different in concept
> from the MAC address, and yet there has not been a hue and cry to boycott
> NIC manufacturers.
Ho wmany home users ar LAN connected to the internet?
oh, yeah, that's right, they dial up with a modem; no getting a MAC
address from a machine that does not have one.
>
> >And what do you mean get over it??? This kind of personal information
> >is valuable. Business are willing to pay for it. This kind of
> >behavior IS DOWNRIGHT THEFT!!!
>
> But whatever they could do with a CPU ID, they are probably already doing
> with a MAC address. It is just as good as a unique identifier. "Get over
> it" is exactly the right attitude.
Can you explain how they would be getting a MAC address from my friends'
NIC-less pc?
A MAC address is not as good, in any event. NICs get changed mor often
than cpus (in most cases). IIRC MAC addresses can be changed, and there
have been cases of MAC addresses beinf reused?
------------------------------
From: "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't ping localhost(127.0.0.1) and own host name from Linuxbox
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 19:03:35 +0100
Roger Helgesen wrote in message <7cteiv$46v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I'v knew that, but not what to do with it !!
>>You don't have a loopback device:
>># ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
>># route add -host 127.0.0.1 lo
>>
>># /etc/hosts:
>>127.0.0.1 localhost loopback
>>192.168.0.1 blabla
>>
>>s. NET-3-HOWTO-5.html
>>
I don't know which distribution you are using, but on mine (SuSE) the
loopback device gets setup in /etc/rc.d/boot by:
# ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 up
# route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 dev lo
It is after filesystem mounting & timezone and before setting hostname.
And make sure you have a line in /etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1 localhost
leo
------------------------------
From: "Quantum Leaper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.tcl,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info**
Date: 19 Mar 1999 20:05:49 GMT
Michael Barnes wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Every MODEM has a MAC address also...so your friends pc is nicless, but not
>macless
Interesting is over 15 years of using modems, 300 baud to 56K modems
(hopefully a Cable or DSL modem in about a year or so), I have NEVER heard
that they have a MAC address? So what command or how do you get the MAC
address of a modem? Does this only apply to Mac modems or all modems? One
other question, why would a modem need a MAC address?
------------------------------
From: "Rufus V. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.tcl,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info**
Date: 19 Mar 1999 20:05:14 GMT
All that is needed to get to the dial up user is an address of the service
provider's modem that the user called in on!
This is obviously not unique to an individual.
The IP address he gets when he logs in is also out of a pool of addresses
and is also non-unique.
Michael Barnes wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Every MODEM has a MAC address also...so your friends pc is nicless, but not
>macless
>As far as I know you cannot network anywhere without a mac address since
>IP's map directly to machine addresses at lower levels to identify your
>particular machine on any network. So, if your connected to any network
via
>any hardware device (router, switch, modem, nic) those devices must have
mac
>addresses.
>
>and modems are easy to replace compared to CPU's also...
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Jason McKnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SAMBA: Enrypted Passwords
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 15:04:06 -0500
Has anybody gotten this to work properly? I can access my linux box via
NT and SAMBA if I turn off encrypted passwords in the registry and in
smb.conf. But if they are both on, I can't log in.
I did the cat /etc/passwd | mssmbpasswd.sh > /etc/smbpasswd and got a
smbpasswd file, but it doesn't seem to work.
I have my smb.conf pointed to /etc/smbpasswd but I can't seem to get it
to work.
Any ideas what I am doing wrong? I would like to get this to work so
that I can give some people remote access, but I would rather have
encrypted passwords.
tia,
Jason McKnight
------------------------------
From: "JR McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: For all you Nicrosoft lovers
Date: 19 Mar 1999 20:19:25 GMT
mike wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>My rental building complex wants to save money and not fix
>the intercom and door buzzer. They want to hijack all the
>phone lines in the building and run them through
>a general intercom-buzzer system. When some one rings I will
>be bounced off line. Who knows what else they can decide
>to do with those lines.
> Do people have any rights of privacy any more.!
> I heard that police agencies can follow a suspect until
>they somehow leave a trace of their DNA and take it. Like
>a glass or plate or knife or fork in a restaurant or a hair.
>or from a napkin or tissue. What if you happen to
>throw some gum in a public garbage can or spit. Soon you
>whole genetic info like health prognosis is open to anyone
>like prespective employers .......
> Where will it all end???
> Mike
Personaly, If one would wish to wast the money and resources to fret
over little ol' me then they are more than welcome to. Better yet, just send
the money to me personaly and I will be willing to save them the leg work
and spill my guts about my boring, simple little life...
Make all checks payable to....
The number of people in this world makes it almost impossable to pick
any person out just for the fun of it, the goverment is like a sleeping
dragon. Unless one is fool enough to wake to ones existance there is little
need to worry about it even caring you exist. Life is masured by thoes
around you not thoes that never knew you...
Sorry, just my 2 cents worth, and it is not even worth that much. :)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: LCP Timeout and 7 bit connection
Date: 19 Mar 1999 09:15:19 -0600
Hannes Graah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I have 3 different isp's.
: 2 of them being PAP and one is an ordinary chatscript isp.
: When I try to connect to the PAP isp's I get
: "LCP: Timeout while sending config requests"
This usually means that the ISP is not on the other end of the line from
the very start of the PPP link configuration negotiation. I'd check the
chat script for errors and review the chat messages in /var/log/messages.
: and when I try to connect to my chatscript isp I get
: a 7 bit connection instead of 8.
This usually means that the ISP is on the other end of the line but is
running a text-based program, e.g., login prompt or a selection menu.
It is reflecting what you send with the 8-th bit stripped. There's a
section devoted to this in the PPP-HOWTO.
You'll need to post the chat scripts and the related messages in
/var/log/messages for better answers.
: I'm using Kernel 2.2.2 and ppp 2.3.5.
: I also have a network card installed and properly working.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* The wealth of a nation is created by the productive labor of its
* citizens. */
------------------------------
From: Curt Steger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.tcl,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info**
Date: 19 Mar 1999 20:09:11 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quantum Leaper wrote:
> Michael Barnes wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Every MODEM has a MAC address also...so your friends pc is nicless, but not
> >macless
>
> Interesting is over 15 years of using modems, 300 baud to 56K modems
> (hopefully a Cable or DSL modem in about a year or so), I have NEVER heard
> that they have a MAC address? So what command or how do you get the MAC
> address of a modem? Does this only apply to Mac modems or all modems? One
> other question, why would a modem need a MAC address?
Only if it is running on an Apple/Mac!
Any here I thought that a MAC address was a special address book that Billy-bum
kept for retaliation if he ever took over the world. ?:^)
------------------------------
From: "jerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Internet Service Providers (ISP)
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 11:06:16 -0500
Hi!
Can Linux be used to connect to the Internet with ALL ISPs? Thanks.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg Gershowitz)
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.tcl,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info**
Date: 19 Mar 1999 19:59:52 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Someone tell my why this is such a big deal? Every unix box in
existance has a unique ID. It's the hostid. What's it for?
Licensing, mostly. Of course unix licensing is far more mature than
for windows. Heck, even a 486 can be made to cough up a hostid. Of
course, I don't know of any cases where that hostid get transmitted to
a vendor, but what's to stop it from happening?
-Greg G
--
-Greg "TORCHA" Gershowitz
-DG3X's own Extreme Icon
To Reply: See the organization line
Spam sucks. Fuck you spammers. Have a Nice Day.
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/5207
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stuart R. Fuller)
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.tcl,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: Re: The truth about the Pentium III chip and ID --- **boycott info**
Date: 19 Mar 1999 20:02:52 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greg Gershowitz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
:
: Someone tell my why this is such a big deal? Every unix box in
: existance has a unique ID. It's the hostid.
Well, there's a command called "hostid", and it makes a function call to
"sethostid" and/or "gethostid". However, it is not required that they return
unique values. For example, my Linux box (Cyrix processor) returns a number
that converts back to my IP address. That IP address may vary from time to
time. Some Digital UNIX boxes I just tried all return 0 for hostid. Some Sun
boxes return unique (at least unique between the few I looked at) values, and
they are not related to the IP address. However, the Sun boxes do not
constitute "every unix box in existance[sic]".
Stu
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Roberts)
Subject: Re: installed nic not initilized
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 20:33:00 GMT
In article <7ctlck$pt6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Kyle Bowerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have installed a 3c509 in a slackware box successfully
> but the link light on the hub and the card are down.
> I have installed two 3c509 in another box and am very familiar with setting
> them up.
> In the box in question I have configured eth0 and can see my mac address so
> I know the device is working and when I boot in w95 it
> works fine. When I install the module the lights never come up.
> but I see the 3c509 in /etc/proc/interrupts and /etc/proc/ioports.
>
> Is there a way I can debug the device. The problem must be in a low layer
> because I can ping the loop back and the device address but nothing outside
> the box.
>
> Does anyone have any insight?
> Thanks in advance
> Kyle Bowerman
>
What does ifconfig give you?
--
Jim Roberts Never enough time!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Brent Cornwell, Pediatrics Computer Administrator"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.lang.perl.misc,comp.lang.python,comp.lang.tcl,comp.mail.sendmail,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Subject: by the way...
Date: 19 Mar 1999 20:06:02 GMT
take this thread to: comp.sys.intel
it's more relevant there..
------------------------------
From: "George Csahanin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: setting MTU and MRU
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 19:19:32 GMT
But Linux people are
a) more informed
b) more polite
c) just plain nicer!
-GC
:)
Probably onre reason I have "played" with Linux for over five years now. You
encounter great people. Who are not afraid to share any info. Try that with
your average NT sys admin. Cards held close, don't let anybody see the "big
board" (Dr. Strangelove)
Gero H. Marten wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>"J.M. Paden" wrote:
>
>>
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Class\NetTrans\0002]
>
>Hey people, this is a Linux newsgroup!
>
>--
>Gero H. Marten
><http://www.provi.de/gmarten/index.html>
>--
------------------------------
From: "Graham Wharton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NFS and win98/linux
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 18:36:21 -0000
I have done, what are those error messages for. Is it to do with the
passwords
Raymond Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>With NFS the UID and GID must match the onces taht are in the /etc/passwd
file.
>WIth most NFS clients on windows, you can set the UID and GID, set them to
match
>the once in your /etc/passwd file for that user and it must work.
>
>Raymond
>
>Graham Wharton wrote:
>
>> I have just a quick question regarding my setup
>> I have two directories exported on my linux box using nfsd and am able to
>> connect to them locally and also from a BeOS machine on the network. Both
>> mount fine
>>
>> I am trying to connect using Intergraph's DiskAccess software from
Windows
>> 98 and keep on getting refused error messages when it tries to check my
UID
>> and GID
>>
>> /var/log/messages gives me this recurring error
>>
>> Mar 18 20:39:45 linux portmap[1549]: connect from 192.168.0.3 to
>> callit(ypserv): request not forwarded
>> Mar 18 20:39:59 linux portmap[1550]: connect from 192.168.0.3 to
>> callit(ypserv): request not forwarded
>> Mar 18 20:40:04 linux portmap[1551]: connect from 192.168.0.3 to
>> callit(ypserv): request not forwarded
>> Mar 18 20:40:10 linux portmap[1552]: connect from 192.168.0.3 to
>> callit(ypserv): request not forwarded
>> Mar 18 20:40:19 linux portmap[1553]: connect from 192.168.0.3 to
>> callit(ypserv): request not forwarded
>> Mar 18 20:40:29 linux portmap[1554]: connect from 192.168.0.3 to
>> callit(ypserv): request not forwarded
>>
>> Has anybody any ideas on what is happening, and where i can look to try
and
>> sort it out
>>
>> Your time is appreciated
>> --
>> Graham Wharton
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> =========================================
>> Main Home Page
>> http://www.dotdot.force9.co.uk
>>
>> Discussion Board
>>
http://cgi.dotdot.force9.co.uk/cgi-bin/entercgi.pl?discus/messages/board-top
>> ics.html
>>
>> E-Mailing files as attatchments with sendmail (MIME)
>> proper text counter and access logger
>> Dynamic generation of HTML
>> =========================================
>
>--
>=====================================================================
>Windows is a 32 bit patch to a 16 bit GUI based on a 8 bit operating
>system, written for a 4 bit processor by a 2 bit company which can
> not stand 1 bit of competition.
>=====================================================================
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (root)
Crossposted-To: aus.computers.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: How to compile Kernel 2.2.2 with redhat 5.2???
Date: 19 Mar 1999 20:23:22 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Gray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Dear Aaron,
: > I cannot get the 2.2.2 kernel to work correctly under RedHat 5.2.
Hi - I wasn't able to do that either - but all of my problems vanished after
having upgraded to kernel 2.2.3. Cheers, juergen.
--
*****************************************************************
* Juergen Leising, E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* http://www.stud.uni-bayreuth.de/~a0037/ *
*****************************************************************
------------------------------
From: "��d�W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: hk.comp.os.linux,hk.comp.pc
Subject: Re: ne.o & 3c509.o compiled ???
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 1999 03:56:33 +0800
Thanks for your feedback !
But I am really a Newbie in Linux, especially in Building Kernel(the 1st
time).
I am not sure what your exactly mean ?
>well, your problem with the ethernet card is, it could have been the
address
>of your e-card.
>first question to you is, have you ever, successfully ismod the card module
>before?
I don't understand what is [ismod].
The NICs work perfectly before compile the kernel.
eth0 for NE2000(ISA) NIC connect to internet.
eth1 for 3Com 3c905(PCI) NIC connect in ethernet LAN.
I need to file /etc/conf.modules to run it before.
alias eth0 ne
options ne io=0x300
alias eth1 3c59x
>the problem with your 2nd problem is, even you copy the module, seems like
it
>was build on a diff. kernel. that's why it won't match.
I understand that it is really a silly behaviour.
But I cannot get any ne.o and 3c59x.o for kernel 2.2.3 now.
I suppose it is embedded in the kernel image after it is compiled.
Anyway, is that any method to compile these 2 files for 2.2.3 other re-build
the kernel again ?
>p.s. does NE2000 uses 3c59 module??
No I copy both ne.o and 3c59x.o for kernel 2.0.36-0.7 to the new kernel.
Also, I am keeping the file /etc/conf.modules now.
Thank You !!!
=====ԭʼ�]��=====
�ļ���: Delson Hung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
��Ⱥ�M: comp.os.linux.networking,hk.comp.os.linux,hk.comp.pc
����: 1999��3��18�� PM 12:00
��ּ: Re: ne.o & 3c509.o compiled ???
>"�ȿ���" wrote:
>
>> Before, I haven't build the kernel.
>> I need to prepare the file /etc/conf.modules:
>>
>> alias eth0 ne
>> options ne io=0x300
>> alias eth1 3c59x
>>
>> And today, I try to build the kernel.
>> I have chosen the [Y] in both 3com NIC support and NE2000 support.
>> So, I won't got this two modules(ne.o and 3c59x.o) any more during
building.
>> Then, the problem happened !!!
>> On starting:
>> ...
>> Enable IPv4 packet forwarding.
>> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
>> ...
>> eth1: unknown interface. (NE2000 NIC change from eth0 to eth1)
>> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
>>
>> What's more, I try to copy back the files:
>> ne.o to /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/ne.o
>> 3c59x.o to /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o
>>
>> Then the system report:
>> ...
>> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
>> insmod: /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o: kernel module version mismatch
>> /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o was compiled for kernel
version
>> 2.0.36 while this kernel is version 2.2.3.
>> eht1: unknown interface.
>> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
>> ...
>>
>> What should I do now, is that supports been compiled to kernel yet ???
>> I have chosen [Y] for these 2 NIC support already !!!
>> Would you please offer your Kindly Help ?
>
>well, your problem with the ethernet card is, it could have been the
address
>of your e-card.
>first question to you is, have you ever, successfully ismod the card module
>before?
>
>the problem with your 2nd problem is, even you copy the module, seems like
it
>was build on a diff. kernel. that's why it won't match.
>
>p.s. does NE2000 uses 3c59 module??
>
Delson Hung ���g��峹 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>"��d�W" wrote:
>
>> Before, I haven't build the kernel.
>> I need to prepare the file /etc/conf.modules:
>>
>> alias eth0 ne
>> options ne io=0x300
>> alias eth1 3c59x
>>
>> And today, I try to build the kernel.
>> I have chosen the [Y] in both 3com NIC support and NE2000 support.
>> So, I won't got this two modules(ne.o and 3c59x.o) any more during
building.
>> Then, the problem happened !!!
>> On starting:
>> ...
>> Enable IPv4 packet forwarding.
>> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
>> ...
>> eth1: unknown interface. (NE2000 NIC change from eth0 to eth1)
>> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
>>
>> What's more, I try to copy back the files:
>> ne.o to /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/ne.o
>> 3c59x.o to /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o
>>
>> Then the system report:
>> ...
>> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
>> insmod: /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o: kernel module version mismatch
>> /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o was compiled for kernel
version
>> 2.0.36 while this kernel is version 2.2.3.
>> eht1: unknown interface.
>> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
>> ...
>>
>> What should I do now, is that supports been compiled to kernel yet ???
>> I have chosen [Y] for these 2 NIC support already !!!
>> Would you please offer your Kindly Help ?
>
>well, your problem with the ethernet card is, it could have been the
address
>of your e-card.
>first question to you is, have you ever, successfully ismod the card module
>before?
>
>the problem with your 2nd problem is, even you copy the module, seems like
it
>was build on a diff. kernel. that's why it won't match.
>
>p.s. does NE2000 uses 3c59 module??
>
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 12:24:08 -0800
From: Steve Ginsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pam_rhosts_auth problem...
Hi
I am rdisting to this new 5.2 Red Hat Intel box from a server on our
network:
on the server (I call the server, servername for this email) I get:
servername 5# rdist -m linus
linus: updating host linus
linus: LOCAL ERROR: Unexpected input from server: "Permission denied.".
linus: updating of linus finished
on the workstation, linus I get this in the messages log. I've read a
bit about pamd, but I haven't found the answer yet. I've been looking in
.rhosts, hosts.equiv, NIS, and groups files...
Mar 19 12:22:28 linus pam_rhosts_auth[624]: denied to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as root: access not allowed
Any light to shine??? I can rlogin into the machine from the server as
root...
Thanks,
Steve
--
Steve Ginsberg Tippett Studio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(510)649-9711 X223 FAX(510)649-9399
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Even innocent people need privacy
Date: 19 Mar 1999 16:47:06 GMT
There's this attitude that if you're not doing anything wrong, then you
shouldn't worry about lack of privacy. That's wrong; here are examples.
- Do you want potential thieves to know that you're going on vacation?
Do you want them to be able to find what alarm company you subscribe to,
if any?
- Do you want your competitor to know about the product you're developing,
or the employee you're thinking of hiring? In fact, executives who
fly private planes are now bitching about a public database that lets you
type in the number of a plane and retrieve its current flight path.
- Are you so sure that you're innocent? Here's what local police often
do to trap men in alleged rape cases. The woman says it was rape; the man
says it was consensual. The police are quite sympathetic to the man, and
ask him to describe what actually happened, in great detail. Then they
charge him with sodomy in addition to rape. Since he admitted to sodomy,
which is often still illegal but few people know that, he hasn't a chance,
even if the sex was consensual.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Laurent Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Modem not responding !
Date: 19 Mar 1999 16:48:33 GMT
Hi,
I've just installed the RedHat 5.2 (kernel 2.0.36). My modem is a USR
56K professional message modem (external modem). I still have a winmodem
that I don't use anymore inside my computer.
Under Windows 95, my modem is connected on COM 1 (port 03F8, irq 4).
Therefore in control-panel I set my modem to /dev/cua0 (I've also tried
/dev/ttyS0).
Reading the Serial-HOWTO, I try to talk to my modem with kermit but I
get no answers at all (not even a beep !).
My mouse is an Intellimouse connected on psaux (PS/2), thus there
shouldn't be a conflict between my modem and my mouse.
In /var/log/dmesg I have :
Serial driver version 4.13 with no serial options enabled
PS/2 auxiliary pointing device detected -- driver installed.
Shouldn't I have some lines about my serial ports ?
When typing setserial -g /dev/cua0 I get :
/dev/cua0, UART: unknown, Port: 0x03f8, IRQ: 4
Is it normal to get an unknown UART ? I set UART to 16550A but it didn't
change anything.
Is it possible that the winmodem still inside my computer hides in some
way the other modem ?
Any ideas ?
Laurent
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Comech)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: V.90 ISA Modems!?!?!
Date: 19 Mar 1999 16:48:13 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I am using an AOpen FM56-ITU (isa) modem with RedHat5.2. This was the
> easiest thing to setup. All I had to do was set the jumper to com2
Lying, old man! That modem is preconfigured to use COM2, IRQ3!
Cheers,
Andrew
------------------------------
From: Olaf Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Setting up a NFS server
Date: 19 Mar 1999 11:47:23 -0500
Raymond Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Be sure that the portmapper runs on your cleints asswell.
>
> Raymond
This is not the problem. I am running portmap on the clients as well.
Olaf
--
Olaf Meyer | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | _~o
Computer and Information Science | http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~olafm | _-\_<,
University of Pennsylvania | | (*)/'(*)
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6389, USA | PGP: finger -l [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
