Linux-Networking Digest #580, Volume #10 Sun, 21 Mar 99 15:13:46 EST
Contents:
Re: ne.o & 3c509.o compiled ??? (JeFF)
Re: ne.o & 3c509.o compiled ??? (Enbugger)
Re: Unable to logon at console after kernel 2.2.3-2 upgrade! (Steven Howe)
Re: Sextuple Boot (Tom Neilson)
4mb Ram 386 router (mike dombrowski)
Re: simple routing question (Andy Osborne)
sshd error (kaos)
Re: What is the best Linux to install? (dlr)
Solved DNS hookup to NT w/ Cable Modem (Sergio Olivas)
Re: Cannot connect to shared drives on SAMBA SERVER from WIN98 CLIENT (Benoit
Gerrienne)
Quota on RedHat 5.2 ("Josh Thorstad")
ip-masq / port-forwarding question ? (Erik Myllymaki)
Re: how to connect 3 computers? (Peter Depuydt)
E-mails Returned ... any Ideas? (Desmond Coughlan)
If minicom, then... ("Ju")
How to get Linux machine to appear in Windows Network? ("Matt G")
Re: PPP configuration (Tiger)
Re: NFS problems with Linux 2.2.x server, freebsd client (Leslie Mikesell)
Re: SSH 2.0 client? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 00:35:54 +0800
From: JeFF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: hk.comp.os.linux,hk.comp.pc
Subject: Re: ne.o & 3c509.o compiled ???
i have make the kernel again
it created the dir. /lib/modules/2.x.x
but it only can read 2.x.x-123
Delson Hung wrote:
> JeFF wrote:
>
> > i use "mv -r 2.x.x-123 2.x.x" to do that
> > and i want the kernel read 2.x.x
> > but it ONLY read 2.x.x-123
> >
> > Delson Hung wrote:
> >
> > > JeFF wrote:
> > >
> > > > >insmod: /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o: kernel module version mismatch
> > > > have u "make modules_install" ?
> > > > All modules have to use with right version of kernel
> > > >
> > > > And anybody know how to move "/lib/modules/2.x.x-123" to "/lib/modules/2.x.x"
> > > > what step should i do?
> > >
> > > what do u mean by "move"?? relocate or rename?
> > > also, are they files or directory structure?
>
> ?? seems odd, when you do make modules, it should only create the kernel version
> directory and stuff.
>
> what other thing you can do is, ln -s /lib/modules/2.x.x-123 /lib/modules/2.x.x
------------------------------
From: Enbugger <enbugger@usa./NO-SPAM/net>
Crossposted-To: hk.comp.os.linux,hk.comp.pc
Subject: Re: ne.o & 3c509.o compiled ???
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 1999 02:47:21 +0800
I am sorry that I've wrongly type your e-mail address.
Please check it now.
IMHO, this is the best method to re-build your loadable modules:
--> >> > make xconfig <OR> make config <Whatever you want>
--> >> > Select the drivers: NE2000 and 3C59x as modules [M] (instead of [Y])
--> >> > make modules
--> >> > make modules_install
"��d�W" wrote:
>
> >> Besides, rebuild the Kernel and choose [M] for NIC support.
> >> Is there any other method to obtain the files ne.o and 3c59x.o ?
> >
> >Yes, I compile them and send to you. ^_~
> >Please check your e-mail now.
> >(I assume that <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is a valid e-mail address.)
>
> Sorry, I cannot receive the files ne.o and 3c59x.o ?
> Would you please send it again to me ?
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is really a valid e-mail address.
>
> >In fact, if you have not do 'make clean' after you compile
> >the kernel, it only takes a short time to compile the modules.
>
> How can I obtain the ne.o and 3c59x.o modules for kernel 2.2.3 ?
> Can I compile it from /usr/src/linux-2.2.3/drivers/net/3c59x.c
> and /usr/src/linux-2.2.3/drivers/net/ne.c after
> built kernel ?
> How to compile ?
>
> Thanks very much !
>
> >> Enbugger ���g��峹 <7d0kfi$117$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"��d�W" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> would you mind telling me what is initrd image ?
> >> >> I haven't done this step.
> >> >> Is it too late for me to do this now ?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >initrd image is the image of the "Initial RAM disk" which contains
> >> >some of the kernel modules that are necessary to boot up the system,
> >> >e.g. some block devices: SCSI drivers, sound card drivers, etc.
> >> >
> >> >> Another Question is that:
> >> >> How can I obtain the ne.o and 3c59x.o modules for kernel 2.2.3 ?
> >> >> Can I compile it from /usr/src/linux-2.2.3/drivers/net/3c59x.c
> >> >> and /usr/src/linux-2.2.3/drivers/net/ne.c
> >> after
> >> >> built kernel ?
> >> >> How to compile ?
> >> >
> >> >As you stated in your past messages, you have built the modules _INTO_
> >> >the kernel image, i.e. bzImage.
> >> >
> >> >If you _do_ want to build them as loadable modules instead, you can do:
> >> > make xconfig <OR> make config <Whatever you want>
> >> > Select the drivers: NE2000 and 3C59x as modules [M] (instead of [Y])
> >> > make modules
> >> > make modules_install
> >> >
> >> >However, please refer to my last message. In it, you can find a way
> >> >to force the kernel to detect your NE2000.
> >> >
> >> >Ref.
> >> >news:7cuasi%2478c%241%40imsp009a.netvigator.com
> >> >
> >> >> Enbugger ���g��峹 <7ctuhj$kss$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >> >Have you re-built the initrd image by using
> >> >> >mkinitrd ?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >If you have set
> >> >> >[Y] in both 3com NIC support and NE2000
> >> >> >[Y] Enable IPv4 packet forwarding
> >> >> >when building the kernel, they are already
> >> >> >compiled into the kernel image.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >You can check the eth drivers by
> >> >> >dmesg |grep eth
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Can you actually use the ethernet by running the
> >> >> >new kernel?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >HTH
> >> >> >
> >> >> >"��d�W" wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I have done this la !
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Enbugger ���g��峹 <7ctncl$l52$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >> >> >> >I am not sure if you are using RedHat.
> >> >> >> >If you are, please refer to this document for
> >> >> >> >version 2.2 kernel upgrade:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >http://www.redhat.com/support/docs/rhl/kernel-2.2/kernel2.2-upgrade.html
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Hints:
> >> >> >> >Have you done:
> >> >> >> > make modules
> >> >> >> >and
> >> >> >> > make modules_install
> >> >> >> >?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >"��d�W" wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Before, I haven't build the kernel.
> >> >> >> >> I need to prepare the file /etc/conf.modules:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> alias eth0 ne
> >> >> >> >> options ne io=0x300
> >> >> >> >> alias eth1 3c59x
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> And today, I try to build the kernel.
> >> >> >> >> I have chosen the [Y] in both 3com NIC support and NE2000
> support.
> >> >> >> >> So, I won't got this two modules(ne.o and 3c59x.o) any more
> during
> >> >> >> building.
> >> >> >> >> Then, the problem happened !!!
> >> >> >> >> On starting:
> >> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> >> Enable IPv4 packet forwarding.
> >> >> >> >> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
> >> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> >> eth1: unknown interface. (NE2000 NIC change from eth0 to
> eth1)
> >> >> >> >> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> What's more, I try to copy back the files:
> >> >> >> >> ne.o to /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/ne.o
> >> >> >> >> 3c59x.o to /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Then the system report:
> >> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> >> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
> >> >> >> >> insmod: /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o: kernel module version
> >> mismatch
> >> >> >> >> /lib/modules/2.2.3/net/3c59x.o was compiled for
> kernel
> >> >> >> version
> >> >> >> >> 2.0.36 while this kernel is version 2.2.3.
> >> >> >> >> eht1: unknown interface.
> >> >> >> >> modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
> >> >> >> >> ...
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> What should I do now, is that supports been compiled to kernel
> yet
> >> ???
> >> >> >> >> I have chosen [Y] for these 2 NIC support already !!!
> >> >> >> >> Would you please offer your Kindly Help ?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >--
> >> >> >> >Enbugger
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >p.s. Remove /NO-SPAM/ for e-mail.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >--
> >> >> >Enbugger
> >> >> >
> >> >> >p.s. Remove /NO-SPAM/ for e-mail.
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >Enbugger
> >> >
> >> >p.s. Remove /NO-SPAM/ for e-mail.
> >
> >--
> >Enbugger
> >
> >p.s. Remove /NO-SPAM/ for e-mail.
--
Enbugger
p.s. Remove /NO-SPAM/ for e-mail.
------------------------------
From: Steven Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin
Subject: Re: Unable to logon at console after kernel 2.2.3-2 upgrade!
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 18:56:07 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"John Q. Public" wrote:
> I upgraded our RedHat Linux 5.2 system kernel 2.0.36-7 to 2.2.3-2. Things
> appeared to go quite smoothly.
>
> After a system restart Linux appeared to boot without problems. When the
> logon prompt appeared, I attempted to logon (as root). Unfortunately, after
> entering the username and pressing Enter the username disappears and I am
> not prompted for a password - I'm back at the username prompt!
>
> Other than that, the system appears to be running fine.Apache and Samba are
> running fine, without incidence.
>
> I would appreciate any help in this matter.
Sounds like your login process (/bin/login) can't start you login shell
program (tcsh, bash, pdksh). I would start in single usermode
(LILO prompt type kernel name and single:
example: llilo: linux single <ret>
)
This should start as root with a bash shell running. Then find the shell you
are using in the password files
and attempt to start it
example
[howe@hadrian howe]$ grep howe /etc/passwd | cut -f7 -d:
/bin/bash
file `grep howe /etc/passwd | cut -f7 -d:` (backward quotes (on tilde key))
should return:
/bin/bash: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1, dynamically
linked, stripped
This verifies that the shell exists, and is executable
Then you can do a ldd on the file to see what libraries (if any) it is
dependent on. The verify that the libraries exist
[howe@hadrian howe]$ ldd /bin/bash
libtermcap.so.2 => /lib/libtermcap.so.2 (0x40007000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4000b000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00000000)
So that fix path is:
verify the shell exist
verify it works (run it)
if that fails, verify it is executable, and you have permission to use it
(-rwxr-xr-x)
verify it's libraries exist, and are in the normal linker location (see
/etc/ld.so.conf)
Some where along this path you will find the break.
Fixing could be as easy as changing you shell location in the password file,
setting a permission or providing a link to the real library.
(
[howe@hadrian howe]$ file /lib/libtermcap.so.2
/lib/libtermcap.so.2: symbolic link to libtermcap.so.2.0.8
[howe@hadrian howe]$ file /lib/libtermcap.so.2.0.8
/lib/libtermcap.so.2.0.8: ELF 32-bit LSB shared object, Intel 80386, version
1, not stripped
)
Good luck
Steven Howe
------------------------------
From: Tom Neilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sextuple Boot
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.os.netware.misc
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 16:06:34 GMT
In comp.os.linux.networking Ken Agress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: On Tue, 16 Mar 1999 23:07:15 -0500, "Rick Droske"
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: <snip>
: I expect a lot.
: Ken Agress/CNE
<BIG GRIN>
I was feeling alittle down before I read your response to this "tripe".
You are quit correct in stating that more than a couple of processes lock an
NT box down!
When I was a the IBM Lab, we ran AIX for the backbone with DCE/DFS. (Yes we
still ran and supported AFS). Several Linux boxes where used as routers,
bridges and of course, personal PCs <G>. Our enviroment handled in access of
3400+ users.
When we moved away from OS/2 we tried to incorporate NT into the lab
infrastructure. The only task we would give them with ANY degree of
acceptable reliability was Domain login. (Depending on which support staff
you talked to, this was too much for the code!)
Yep .... I can run Visual Basic ... that makes me a programmer!
--
"Due to financial constraints,
the light at the end of the tunnel
has been turned off until further notice !!"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mike dombrowski)
Subject: 4mb Ram 386 router
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 15:41:32 GMT
I'm currently using a 386sx with 4mb ram to route between my two
networks. The software is dos based and requires that you register it
or it only will run for an hour. So I was wondering if Linux could do
the job. I headed over to the linux router project and it says that a
486 with 12mb ram is needed. Now the 386 has a hard disk so couldn't
an 8mb swap partition do the trick? It doesn't need to be high
performance, just around 200kbs so mp3 transferrs won't take so long.
If so how should I go about setting it up? Or is my best bet to stick
with DOS?
thanks
Mike Dombrowski
------------------------------
From: Andy Osborne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: simple routing question
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 18:20:26 GMT
I find that it is best to forget about routing tables as such and just
set the default route/gateway on each of the NT boxes to the nearside IP
address of the linux box ( or other router). This will also leave things
prepared for you internet connection later. Since your network has two
segments things don't need to be too complicated ;-P.
I hope this helps,
Andy.
> i have 3 boxes, 1 nt4.0 server, 1 nt4.0 wstn and 1 linux box. The
> linux box has 2 NIC's in it. The plan: to be able to connect the two nt
> boxes through the linux box. as it stands i have the nt wstn at
> 10.32.0.2 and the nt serv at 10.64.0.2 with the corresponding linux
> NIC's at 10.32.0.1 and 10.64.0.1. from the wstn (10.32.0.2) i can ping
> 10.32.0.1 and 10.64.0.1 but not 10.64.0.2. The same from the ntserv; i
> can ping 10.64.0.1 and 10.32.0.1 but not 10.32.0.2. What sort of
> routing table(s) do i need on the boxes? Do i need to set up special
> routing tables on the nt boxes? Is it obvious that i am new to routing
> ? Visually my setup looks like this:
>
> 10.32.0.2 (ntwstn)-------| 10.32.0.1 eth0 // linux box // 10.64.0.1 eth1
> |---------10.64.0.2 (ntserv)
>
> the ultimate goal (expect a few more cries for help as i make my way up
> the learning curve) is to be able to browse the nt boxes from one
> another and to use the modem in my linux box to connect to the internet
> from both of the nt boxes.
>
> thanks,
> dean
------------------------------
From: kaos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sshd error
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 17:06:51 GMT
My var/log/syslog periodically contains the mesg:
fatal: Bind to port 22 failed: Transport endpoint is not connected
I can still ssh over to the computer which gives that error........
Can anyone help me figure out whats going on?
------------------------------
From: dlr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.redhat,alt.os.linux.slackware
Subject: Re: What is the best Linux to install?
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 19:13:49 +0000
jik- wrote:
> Jason Rotunno wrote:
> >
> > when i read "what ditro" threads a lot of the benefits and drawbacks
> > discussed have dealt with setup/configuration and x. not taking into
> > consideration x, WM's, x apps, etc is there any real difference between
> > the major distros aside from setup?
>
> Yes, though really the only distro that stands out as different is
> slackware. It doesn't use rpm or deb or whatever, it uses tgz. It also
> has a completely different default init confinguration.
Slackware is an excellent--if minimalist--distrib. It is very clean, all
around. Configuration is done by hand, through way of editing configuration
files, which *aren't* burried five directories deep. I just switched to Red
Hat 5.2, as it is glibc based. Because of my inexperience, I wasn't able to
successfully install glibc on the libc based Slackware distribution. Not
taking this into consideration, Slackware is a most elegant distribution.
Daniel
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sergio Olivas)
Subject: Solved DNS hookup to NT w/ Cable Modem
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 16:58:05 GMT
Thought I'd pass this by.....
I have my NT setup (NT box) as the main computer connected to the
@home network. It uses 2 networks cards (winbond 840 10/100), one for
the cable modem and the other for the internel net. It uses DHTP to
get it's ip address for the cable modem (the ip address is always
the same) on one card, and 192.168.0.1 on the second card (for
internal network). It runs Sygate software to which allows it to act
as a gateway. I have a win98 (and nt) (win98 box)) installed on the
second network computer (192.168.0.2) and have been connecting
properly to the internet on that box, using both win98 and NT.... The
gateway and DNS settings simply point to the NT box's ip address
(192.168.0.1) . This has been working great.
Now when I installed Redhat 5.2 on my 2nd box(win98) , I basically
kept the same settings. I could ping the ip address of the main NT
computer, and any other ip address and use nslookup to know that I was
getting to the outside world... I could ftp if I had the ip address,
and use netscape if I had the IP address, but not use
www.netscape.com, or any other place that needed DNS Services.
Netscape would give an error... something about the DNS settings not
being correct.... (Netscape settings - Direct Connection toIinternet)
I played w/ dns/local hosts/ netconfig and all kinds of settings on
the Linux system, but could never get it to ping using the domain
names instead of the ip address... Until.....
I got Cox data sheet that shows the information the NT box uses for
it's cable modem... It shows among other things, the Primary DNS
Server's ip address.
On the (now) Linux box, plugged that number using netconf into the
DNS NameServer1 item, leaving all the other entries blank.
Wallah.... NetScape works, ftp works... everything is fine and
dandy....
So, why isn't this information available in a FAQ??? Everying seems to
have the same (or different) dns problems.... but this information is
not listed anywhere... The information should be there for the
different types of network configurations....
my 2bits.
sergio olivas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Benoit Gerrienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.smb
Subject: Re: Cannot connect to shared drives on SAMBA SERVER from WIN98 CLIENT
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 20:37:34 +0100
liam toh wrote:
>
> >> > >After you execute smbpasswd you shoud have something like the
> >> > >following in your /etc/smbpasswd.
> >> > >
> >> > ># Samba SMB password file
> >> >
> >root:0:7E638C38F146E9A6AAD3B435B51404EE:611B779573C5481E8091149DFC6A68EC:ro
> >> > ot:/root:/bin/bash
>
> I have a similiar problem, after trying to set up my smbpasswd file with the
> command:
>
> cat passwd | mksmbpasswd.sh >smbpasswd
>
> as described on Paul Sery's website, I came up with a smbpasswd file that
> has password entries like this:
> adm:3:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:adm:/va
> r/adm:
> is this just a default set up? Do the X's indicate no password? How should I
> add user passwords?
Hi,
A range of X means that there is no password. This is the correct output of the
script because it's not possible to retrieve the Unix password from the
/etc/passwd file (the password is encrypted using a one-way hash function).
So after creating the smbpasswd file, you need to run the command smbpasswd
<username> for each user present in your smbpasswd file to give them a SMB
password.
By the way, the smbpasswd file you make with the script mksmbpasswd.sh is no
more suitable for a samba server version 2.0.x. You need to upgrade your
smbpasswd file with the script convert_smbpasswd which comes with Samba.
Hope this help,
Best regards,
Benoit Gerrienne
X.400 Cell Customer Service Engineer
Telindus Belgium
My samba help site : http://www.ping.be/linux-and-samba (!! under heavy
construction !!!)
Professional web site : http://www.telindus.com
------------------------------
From: "Josh Thorstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Quota on RedHat 5.2
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 12:46:46 -0600
I have used quota's in the past on Unix System V 4.0 but, RedHat's disk
quota is doing some funny things. When I run # edquota -t to set system
wide times I get
/usr/sbin/vi: No such file or directory
Any ideas?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Myllymaki)
Subject: ip-masq / port-forwarding question ?
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 19:47:28 GMT
This picture represents my set-up.
INTERNET
|
|
|
|
24.25.26.27
-------------------
| |
| Linux Box |
| Router/Firewall|
| |
-------------------
192.168.0.1
|
|
|
|
Internal network
|
|
------------------- other local machines...
| | |
| | |
| | |
192.168.0.3 | |
================ . .
| | . .
| WebServer | . .
| |
=================
I am using ip-masq to
allow the internal machines to use the internet through
the one assigned IP number dynamically set (DHCP) by my
cable provider. My idea is to forward all http requests
aimed at 24.25.26.27:80 to my real web server at 192.168.0.3:80.
(reason? -the router is an old 386, the webserver is a better
machine more capable of handling the load).I have seen two packages
that say the can do this - redir and rinetd.
Does anyone have any experience with either of these packages that they
would like to share? I am using RedHat 5.1.
My masq rules I use at startup are:
ipfwadm -F -p deny;
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.1/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
Thank you kindly,
--
erik myllymaki
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Depuydt)
Subject: Re: how to connect 3 computers?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 17:25:31 GMT
On Fri, 05 Mar 1999 08:19:32 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Ho)
wrote:
>Hi.
>
>My problem is not directly about Linux....but more related to
>networking...oh well anyway....here it is..
>
>I have 3 computers, and they are networked together like this..
>
>
>[ ] -----------[ ] -------------[ ]
>B A C
<snip>
There are a few possible problems.
1) Check all your connectors carefully, including the terminators
using 10Base-2 they should be 50 Ohm.
10Base-2 wireing is also crucial. The cable should be one long line,
with every station connected to it and a terminator at either end.
You can check the calbe using just 2 stations and setting one up as
an echo server.
2) Check the hardware setting of your NIC's
3) Check the configuration of the network protocol you are using.
4) Maybe a tcpdump can give you some more information about what's
happing on your net.
5) Try some other cable and/or NIC's
Good luck
Peter
------------------------------
From: Desmond Coughlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: E-mails Returned ... any Ideas?
Date: 21 Mar 1999 18:20:18 +0100
I've been in e-mail contact with another user about how to configure
sendmail to fool certain mail servers into believing that my mail
comes from '@cybercable.fr', rather than from '@lievre.coughlan.fr',
as the latter doesn't exist in the real world, and so some of my
e-mails are rejected, with the error:
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to loadmail.club-internet.fr.:
>>> MAIL From:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=264
<<< 501 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender domain must exist
501 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Data format error
Club-Internet is just one of the ISPs who won't accept mail from me,
and is by far the 'worst' offender. I have no interest in spamming,
but as a lot of my friends have accounts with Club-Internet, it's a
bit of a pain.
The other user advised me to put the following into my sendmail.cf :
CE root
CMlievre.coughlan.fr
DMcybercable.fr
However, this doesn't work, and my e-mails are still rejected. Does
anyone have any ideas ..?
Thanks.
--
Desmond Coughlan |Restez zen ... Linux peut le faire
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www site under construction]
------------------------------
From: "Ju" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: If minicom, then...
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 12:34:21 -0700
Hello -> notice if we redraw 'lo' we get Help
If minicom works and can connect me to my ISP and I can surf albeit
text-based how come Netscape doesn't also work?
If minicom works can I assume that there aren't any pnp problems? Thus my
failing PPP connection is due to scripting errors?
And, I know my ISP doesn't want anything to do with IPX/SPX or NET BEUI for
win95 hookup, whatever those are.
TCP/IP is the only allowed network protocol. Does this also go for Linux?
And how can I make sure my box is setup right. (dual boot w95/RH5.1
pnpUSR56/fax-modem)
In my /var/log/message file I've noticed stuff about IPX etc. and I get
"alarm" sent from ISP when it comes time to hookup. Maybe that protocol
problem?
Confused by and blinded with questions and problems.
thank-you Jullian
------------------------------
From: "Matt G" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to get Linux machine to appear in Windows Network?
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 19:56:04 -0000
Is this possible. If so, is it then possible to copy from my Windows machine
to shared folders on the Linux machine?
Realtive newbie....
Matt
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tiger)
Subject: Re: PPP configuration
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 19:58:55 GMT
"Pian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I'm using red hat 5.2 and i've been trying to setup internet connection
>using network configuration ...after reboot the following message appear :-
>this system lacks kernel support for PPP.....kernel is not configured for
>PPP.....
>can anybody help me to solve this problem
You need to provide me information in order to locate where the problem is.
Did you have new kernel compiled or you only have the redhat
original 5.2 (kernel v. 2.0.36)?
If you have got new kernel running, did you configure ppp fuction
within kernel or as a module? What exact errors you get at
/var/log/messages?
--
("\''/").___..--''"`-._
\ `9_ 9 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`)
\ /\ (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ( ) _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' .'
.( o ). (il).-'' ((i).' ((!.-'
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Leslie Mikesell)
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: NFS problems with Linux 2.2.x server, freebsd client
Date: 21 Mar 1999 14:07:45 -0600
In article <7d1djn$833$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Last night I actually ran into the guy that's working on the network proxy I
>mentioned, and he was already well aware of ProxyPass (apparently I'm the
>only one who didn't know about it :). Thanks for the figures, though,
>they'll serve as a good benchmark (he assures me that what's being developed
>by his group is _much_ faster -- but they also don't need most of the "other"
>functionality of Apache).
Keep in mind that you aren't going to see any difference in speed
unless you are loading more than a couple of T1's, since Apache
has no trouble doing that on a so-so pentium. There are some
other free solutions to this as well. The one from
http://www.eddieware.org/
does load balancing and dead server detection.
>If you're not running low on RAM, one way to cut that time by
>over 99% is to create an MFS (FreeBSD) or RAMDISK (Linux), and write the
>logfiles there.
A good idea, but I don't want to lose these.
>An alternative, but one that I've never tried personally, is to write the
>logfiles to the network, and have yet another machine that does nothing but
>write logfiles. I'm not sure how scalable a solution that is, how well it
>works, or at what traffic level it becomes feasible -- but I wanted to mention
>it simply for completeness.
I'm considering that. Perhaps a syslog type network write (I would
rather lose an occasional line than bog things down if the
file writer can't keep up.)
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
Subject: Re: SSH 2.0 client?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21 Mar 1999 11:54:26 -0600
Data Fellows has a 2.0 compatible Win32 client. http://www.datafellows.com.
You can even purchase online and download. It's $100US.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
