Linux-Networking Digest #613, Volume #10         Wed, 24 Mar 99 06:13:55 EST

Contents:
  Re: Addtron AE-360PCI Ethernet driver for Linux (Robert Lynch)
  Re: cracker using su on account nobody ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  Re: F7 won't work in minicom (Brian McCauley)
  Re: Linux - NFS mounting a UCX export drive. (Oswald Knoppers)
  Re: NEWBE - Trying to install network card in Linux on win95 network (Brian McCauley)
  8.8.7 -> 8.9.3 (Haaino Beljaars)
  Linux - NFS mounting a UCX export drive. (Stephen Ashley)
  Re: Sorry for such a simple question (Lew Pitcher)
  Re: iipfwadm hard to set rules! (Paul Tomblin)
  Re: What is the best Linux to install? - Consider Freebsd instead (Richard Steiner)
  RH-5.2 with Network Printer HP 4000N ? (Nguyen-Dai Quy)
  config isdn4k-utils fails (Wolfgang Scherer)
  Re: Linux to win98 network problems (Larry Smolyansky)
  Re: About to take the Linux plunge.... (Desmond Coughlan)
  Re: Bought modem to work in LINUX! (Robert Lynch)
  Re: Linux as a firewall!! (Stuart Lynne)
  Re: Bitte um Hilfe sendmail und mutt unter SUSE5.X (Erik Hensema)
  Re: how to get getty to generate login (M. Buchenrieder)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 20:03:51 -0800
From: Robert Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Addtron AE-360PCI Ethernet driver for Linux

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Has anyone found a driver for this card? Mine is not the NE2000 compatible
> model. The drivers from the Addtron site have "Linux" drivers. which were
> written in 1996 and do not work AT ALL (read: won't even compile) with new
> kernel and libraries.
> I am running Redhat 5.2 with 2.2.3 kernel.
> Please, has anyone had success with getting this to work?
> 
> Thank you very much,
> -Michael-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> remove underscores to reply.
> 
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

Maybe if you posted the driver code  that won't compile or e-mailed it
to Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [he's the whiz that does
a lot (all?) of the ethernet drivers for Linux, thank you very much
Donald, and I hope you aren't irritated I suggested this] you'd get some
results?

HTH.  Bob L. 
-- 
Robert Lynch-Berkeley CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.best.com/~rmlynch/

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: redhat.rpm.general
Subject: Re: cracker using su on account nobody
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:01:53 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory G. Woodbury) wrote:
> Jason Keyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> shaped electrons to say:
>
> >Re-install.  Many of the hack-kits being used these days will replace
binaries
> >on your system.  Some of the affected binaries may include tcpd, inetd,
login,
> >ps, su, ping, traceroute, netstat, etc.  The only way you have a chance of
> >being able to really know what is going on is to do a re-install.
>
>   While this is a "Good Idea" (TM)  it isn't an absolute requirement,  the
> RPM has a "verify" option that can do a first level job of checking MD5
> checksums for installed packages.  It's relatively easy to set up a script
> that regularly verifies packages and mails the results to the admin account.
>
>   First, generate a list of all the packages you have installed:
>
>        rpm -q -a | sort > /usr/local/lib/rpmd5.pkgs
>

The problem is that rpm will only verify against the local database.
So conceivably the rootkit could come as an RPM, or as a series of RPMS
and update the database.  I'd like a means to tell rpm

Verify the list of packages that you have on the local machine, but
use the rpm database on the CD-ROM (or network location) for the MD5
sums and so on.

I'd also like a means to force update of all currently installed packages.
Right now, this is non-trivial because of the dependency problem.  E.g.
if I've got Foo-2.1.3 that depends on Bar-1.1.7, and the new version of
Foo depends on Bar-2.03, then I have to upgrade Bar before I can upgrade Foo.
When dealing with 50 redhat boxes in different configurations, this can
get yucky in a hurry.a

============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    

------------------------------

From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: F7 won't work in minicom
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 08:34:11 +0000

Malcolm Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I can dial to my ISP using minicom no problem.
> 
> I can give my user name and password, no problem.
> 
> I can start ppp, no problem.
> 
> But then my ISP wants F7 to confirm the connection.

They assume you are using Windows.

You should always assume that your ISP will assume you are using
Windows.

In Windows dial-up networking F7 is the key you hit to start the PPP
negotiation on the local machine.

When the ISP tells you to hit F7 then do whatever you do in minicom to
start PPP negotiation.  (I don't know - I don't use minicom but I'm
fairly sure it's covered by the PPP-HOWTO).

-- 
     \\   ( )  No male bovine  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .  _\\__[oo   faeces from    | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
 .__/  \\ /\@  /~)  /~[   /\/[ |   +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
 .  l___\\    /~~) /~~[  /   [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
  # ll  l\\  ~~~~ ~   ~ ~    ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
 ###LL  LL\\ (Brian McCauley)  |

------------------------------

From: Oswald Knoppers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.ucx,vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.misc
Subject: Re: Linux - NFS mounting a UCX export drive.
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 09:10:04 +0100

Stephen Ashley wrote:

> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on yakka:/dkdata,
>        or too many mounted file systems

Does your kernel have nfs support (either built in or as a module)?

Regards,

Oswald


------------------------------

From: Brian McCauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NEWBE - Trying to install network card in Linux on win95 network
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 08:45:41 +0000

"Brian or Wayland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I'm trying to get my Linux machine on my network of win95 machines. I'm
> still in the getting the card to work stage. I know it works in Win95
> machines. But I have acouple of problems. 1 ifconfig is saying the card IO
> is at 290. When it is at 280 and Linux at boot times detects that. But I
> can't change it.

Yeah wierd ain't it?  It has been like that in the SMC/WD (or is it
8390-based) NIC-drivers for years.  Dunno why nobody has fixed it.
Doesn't hurt.  Ignore it.

> Brian

Me too.

-- 
     \\   ( )  No male bovine  | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  .  _\\__[oo   faeces from    | Phones: +44 121 471 3789 (home)
 .__/  \\ /\@  /~)  /~[   /\/[ |   +44 121 627 2173 (voice) 2175 (fax)
 .  l___\\    /~~) /~~[  /   [ | PGP-fp: D7 03 2A 4B D8 3A 05 37...
  # ll  l\\  ~~~~ ~   ~ ~    ~ | http://www.wcl.bham.ac.uk/~bam/
 ###LL  LL\\ (Brian McCauley)  |

------------------------------

From: Haaino Beljaars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,linux.redhat.rpm
Subject: 8.8.7 -> 8.9.3
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 09:23:52 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

I am currently trying to upgrade my sendmail from version 8.8.7 to 8.9.3
on a redhat 5.2 system. I have upgraded without succes. The problem is
as follows:

1) which rpms do I need for upgrading, I have found the following:

 sendmail-8.9.1-2.i386.rpm  
 sendmail-cf-8.9.1-6.i386.rpm 
 sendmail-config-8.9.1-6.i386.rpm  

As you can see non of the above sendmails are from version 8.9.3, where
can I find the latest sendmail.rpm (I have tried freshmeat and
filewatcher)

2) When I upgrade with the prviously mentioned sendmail rpms the mapfile
is moved from /usr/bin to /usr/sbin which has the effect that all mail
programs (pine/elm) think that I don't have mail anymore. How can I fix
that, can I just create a symbolic link in /usr/bin to /usr/sbin file? 

Any help would be appresiated, please mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Greetings from Haaino Beljaars

Home Page:      HTTP://www.phys.uu.nl/~beljaars/ 

I am pro Open Source Software

------------------------------

From: Stephen Ashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.ucx,vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.misc
Subject: Linux - NFS mounting a UCX export drive.
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 07:36:31 +0000

I have been trying to mount a VMS drive on my Linux work station. UCX is
installed :-

 DIGITAL TCP/IP Services for OpenVMS VAX Version V4.2 - ECO 1
  on a VAXstation 4000-96 running OpenVMS V6.2

I get the following error in the linux system: -

mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on yakka:/dkdata,
       or too many mounted file systems

I have had no problems mounting NFS exported file systems from a Digital
UNIX host. The DUNIX host also has no problems mounting the VMS file
system.

Any idea's.

Cheers,
Stephen Ashley,
Alice Springs,
Out Back Oz.


------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Subject: Re: Sorry for such a simple question
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 03:04:37 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Tue, 23 Mar 1999 00:50:09 -0500, "Matt Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>I'm quite new to linux and even newer to networking.  What I need to know is
>(go ahead and flame, i deserve it) when setting up IP addresses on the linux
>box (between win98 and linux), is the Linux box the host computer or is it
>the win box? 

What you have to do is let go of the nonsense about 'host' versus 'client'
computers. Linux is neither and both. Client/Server is a way of organizing
programs, and Linux can server as a client to some programs (my Linux
firewall is a print client to my Win95 system), a server to others (my
Win95 workstation is an internet access client to my Linux firewall), and a
peer to others still.

>Also, could somebody post or email me a list of all the files
>i need to edit/settings to change under linux (RH 5.2)?  Thanks a million

I don't know about RedHat's distribution, but in a generic Linux
installation there are a large number of files involved in the overall
system configuration. Unlike Windows, where there's only two or three files
that control everything, each component in a Linux system (and any Unix
system in general) may have it's own configuration files. Get a good book
on Linux (one of the O'Reilly books would be good), read it, and take your
configuration one step at a time. For each step, read the FAQ and HOWTO
documents that came with your system (they should be online somewhere) and,
when in doubt, ask questions.

Good luck.



Lew Pitcher
JOAT-in-training

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Tomblin)
Subject: Re: iipfwadm hard to set rules!
Date: 24 Mar 1999 04:01:39 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Tomblin)

In a previous article, "Super Net News" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I find it is very difficult to set rules with ipfwadm.  Can anyone have some
>examples?

Download isinglass from tummy.com, install it, and let *it* worry about
configuring ipfwadm.


-- 
Paul Tomblin, not speaking for anybody.
"I'm fairly sure Linux exists principally because writing an operating system
probably seems like a good way to pass the <bignum> months of darkness in
Finland" - Rodger Donaldson

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: What is the best Linux to install? - Consider Freebsd instead
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 02:34:05 -0600

Here in comp.os.linux.misc, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Blevins) spake unto us, saying:

>You may want to consider freebsd instead.
>
>Better docs. Easier more intuitive install. Alltogether better system.

I respectfully disagree.  The two seem comparable to me in terms of
basic installation, with a nod to SuSE and RedHat (at the very least)
in the later stages of configuration and for better support of other
filesystems and extended partitions (FreeBSD is crippled by the need
to be installed in a primary, at least IMhO).

As a desktop system, I've never been all that happy with FreeBSD.  It's
okay, I guess, but I prefer all three of the Linux distros I've used
over FreeBSD 2.1/2.2.2/2.2.7 based on my limited experience with those
versions so far.

-- 
   -Rich Steiner  >>>--->  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  >>>---> Bloomington, MN
    OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris + BeOS +
    WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + MacOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
         bough, cough, dough, rough, sought, through, hiccough

------------------------------

From: Nguyen-Dai Quy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RH-5.2 with Network Printer HP 4000N ?
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 11:55:24 +0100

Hi,
We have a Network Printer HP-Laserjet 4000 with JetDirect Card and a IP
address.
How to configure RH-5.2 for printing with this printer.
Which kind we have to use: lpd, SMB, NCP ?
I tried with 'control-panel' but it doesn't work.

Thanks very much for any ideas.
Could you CC me your message ? Thanx !

--
NGUYEN-DAI Quy
LTAS-ULG
http://ltas18.ltas.ulg.ac.be/~quy
...Pourquoi utiliser 'window' quand on a une 'door' ?

------------------------------

From: Wolfgang Scherer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: config isdn4k-utils fails
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 21:51:23 +0100

I am trying to install isdn4k-utils but "make config" ends with an
error:
"/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config file not found" (I have X11 installed, but
this file does not exist)

what did I do wrong?

Thanks & best regards, Wolfgang


------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 14:14:38 -0800
From: Larry Smolyansky <#nospam#[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux to win98 network problems

Randall Debold wrote:

> I'm having difficulties getting my win98 and nt40 server machines
> to see my linux box. The linux box has no trouble see and accessing

Um...not sure about your Linux/Win98/NT problem but you have an even
bigger one:  Your computer is infected with a winsock virus...Check your
original post...There's a happy99.exe attachment that is characteristic
of a winsock virus going around (can't remember the exact name -- check
symantec's page).  You might want to fix that up before you continue.
Who knows, that might be the cause of your problem.  :P

Larry


------------------------------

From: Desmond Coughlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: About to take the Linux plunge....
Date: 24 Mar 1999 07:28:40 +0100

"nebben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have my machine almost ready to go, and I am almost ready to go out
> and get a Linux book/CD combo.  I thought about downloading it all, but
> I wouldn't know what I was downloading, plus I wouldn't know what kind
> of book would cover what I was downloading.  
> 
> In any case, I hope to learn how to use Linux, and how to get a small
> LAN working with Linux being the OS on the solo server.  

I have something along the same lines as the setup you're discussing.
The server is a lot more powerful than yours, I have no SCSI card, a
bigger hard drive, and I use a cable modem setup, but other than that,
it's much the same. 

Advice: go out today and buy some books on Linux by O'Reilly
(http://www.ora.com/).  Their books are witty, often irreverent,
always accurate, and I really think you can't do better.

Good luck !
  
-- 
Desmond Coughlan                |Restez zen ... Linux peut le faire
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www site under construction]
                                

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 22:36:24 -0800
From: Robert Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bought modem to work in LINUX!

Bob D wrote:
> 
> I also bought this modem to upgrade from a 28.8 on my Lan gateway machine.
> However, I can't get the ppp script to work. It dies waiting for ATZ to
> return an 'OK'. I can manually dial out using minicom but the modem response
> to any AT commands come back at the rate of 1 character every 6 seconds!
> Unfortunately there is no help for the Linux user on the 3Com website or
> knowledge base. Anyone using this modem successfully with a ppp dial-up
> script please help!
> 
> Bob D

It's a PNP modem, sounds like it is not set up...

You maybe need to use the pnptools plus maybe setserial to set it up
(read the man pages, of course):

1) Run /sbin/pnpdump > /etc/isapnp.conf

2) edit /etc/isapnp.conf to match your desired modem io, irq

3) run /sbin/isapnp /etc/isapnp.conf

4) maybe do something like this (edit for your config)

/bin/setserial /dev/ttyS0 port 0x3f8 irq 4 uart 16550A spd_vhi

HTH.

Bob L.

P.S. Did I miss anything people?  I'm sure y'all let me know. ;-)
 
> Robert Lynch wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >Hi y'all-
> >
> >I've been reading all the msgs. to the effect "How do I know if I'm
> >getting a Winmodem?" with some interest, because I wanted to buy a 56K
> >v. 90 modem.
> >
> >I decided after a lot of fruitless searching to try this: I contacted a
> >supplier who advertised in Linux Journal, April '99, p. 64, called "ASA
> >Computers".
> >
> >http://www.asacomputers.com/
> >
> >They had marked one modem in their list as a Winmodem: "COMM56IUSRO
> >...WINMODEM!!!! TO BE USED WITH WINDOWS ONLY!!".  So it seemed their
> >advertisement in LJ plus this note implied they know about Linux.  (Does
> >that follow? :)
> >
> >I ordered a USR/3Com 56K data/fax/voice V.90 internal modem, came to
> >about US$80 total with S/H by UPS plus California sales tax.  In the
> >on-line order form and by separate e-mail I emphasized that I wanted a
> >modem that works with Linux, otherwise forget it.  They e-mailed back,
> >"Don't worry, it will work in Linux".
> >
> >It came today.  It's ISA and PNP, but pnptools can handle the latter
> >(and my last, 28.8K modem was PNP anyhow).  They were right, it works in
> >Linux, I get about 50K+ connects.
> >
> >They have cheaper modems than this advertised, also, but I can't speak
> >for these.
> >
> >I have no connection with this outfit.  Seems to me that if they started
> >marking their modems as useable in Linux, they might get a lot of
> >business from us sort of folks.
> >
> >Thought I'd share my modem adventure, in case it helps anyone else.
> >
> >Bob L.
> >--
> >Robert Lynch-Berkeley CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://www.best.com/~rmlynch/
> >

-- 
Robert Lynch-Berkeley CA [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.best.com/~rmlynch/

------------------------------

Subject: Re: Linux as a firewall!!
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stuart Lynne)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 10:15:29 GMT

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Cody Sherr  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>You might want to check out http:/www.linuxrouter.org, too.

And for a cable ready masquerading firewall linux router that boots from a 
single floppy see http:edge.fireplug.net.

-- 
Stuart Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>      604-461-7532      <http://edge.fireplug.net>
PGP Fingerprint: 28 E2 A0 15 99 62 9A 00  88 EC A3 EE 2D 1C 15 68

------------------------------

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Hensema)
Subject: Re: Bitte um Hilfe sendmail und mutt unter SUSE5.X
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 11:56:32 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hartmut Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Hallo,
>
>ich nutze Linux SUSE5.1.
>wenn ich mit mutt mails verschicke wird mein domainamen im Absender als @
>dargestellt z.B. Hartmut.Berger@@.
>Eigentlich ist der MTA, also sendmail daf�r verantwortlich.

Yes it is.

>Wo kann ich in der sendmail.cf eine Einstellung t�tigen oder global f�r alle
>user den domainnamen setzen ?

Maybe you use domain masquerading with the "DM" parameter. It should be
"DMmydomain.com"

>In der sendmail.cf ist der Parameter FROM_Header = lkvsachsen.de gesetzt.

There is no FROM_Header parameter in my sendmail.cf....

I recommend you build a sendmail.cf from a mc file (install the sendmail-cf
rpm, on my Redhat system, the file are unpacked in /var/lib/sendmail-cf), this
prevents weird things like this to happen.

-- 
Erik Hensema ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

------------------------------

Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: how to get getty to generate login
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 09:13:36 GMT

"Farhad Farzaneh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

>The inittab file looks like:

># Run getty on /dev/modem
>0:2345:respawn:/sbin/uugetty -h cua0 57600 vt100

[...]

I can't really recommend using uugetty for this task. Use mgetty instead.

Michael
-- 
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
          Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
    Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.

------------------------------


** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **

The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:

    Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
    ftp.funet.fi                                pub/Linux
    tsx-11.mit.edu                              pub/linux
    sunsite.unc.edu                             pub/Linux

End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************

Reply via email to