Linux-Networking Digest #652, Volume #10 Sat, 27 Mar 99 21:13:42 EST
Contents:
Re: IP masquerading & domain names (Rod Roark)
Re: modules net-pf-??? (Benoit Timbert)
ISA REALTEK PNP RTL8019 ("Yannick Girard")
Re: Netgear FA310TX Cards and Redhat 5.2 (James Beck)
Networking how-to in English? ("Duncan A. McRae")
Can I use same modem to 'diald' out and to 'pap' answer? ("Dean M. Weiten")
Re: compile errors with the kernel part of ppp2.3.5 (Clifford Kite)
Re: Can I use same modem to 'diald' out and to 'pap' answer? ("William Evans")
Setting Up Pipeline 25 (Neil Chambers)
cable modem doesn't work under linux -- strange ("Arjun Banker")
can't rsh properly! (T. Sutherland)
Re: Login Scripts for Win98 workstation How do i do it (Tommy Johnsson)
Re: can't rsh properly! (Neil Chambers)
Re: help: ne2k-pci module says: resource busy (M. Buchenrieder)
Re: IP masquerading & domain names (JCA)
Help me spend $2,000 on a new Linux-based computer ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Linux and Cable Modem ("Scott Fleming")
IP connectivity Problem - 2.2.4 SMP + Intel EtherExpress 16 ("Michael Harsch")
Re: NFS Permission problems (L J Bayuk)
Re: winmodems (Chris "Cranky Spice" Harshman)
Re: NFS problems with Linux 2.2.x server, freebsd client (Jesus Monroy, Jr.)
12����Ů+��Ů! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Rod Roark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP masquerading & domain names
Date: 28 Mar 1999 00:02:59 GMT
Desmond Coughlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>JCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I have two Linux boxes connected to the Internet. One of them is
>> directly connected
>> and enables the other to gain Internet access by means of IP
>> masquerading.
>>
>> I am confused about the domain name to be used for my internal
>> network, if any.
>> I don't think it can be that of my ISP as I have been assigned one and
>> only one IP
>> address. Can anybody enlighten me here, please?
>You can name them whatever you like. My domain name is coughlan.fr,
>which doesn't exist in the real world.
I suggest avoiding .fr or .com or any other standard top-level domain.
That way you're guaranteed to avoid conflicts.
On my home network, I just use "foo.bar"... wasn't inspired with
anything more imaginative.
-- Rod
======================================================================
Sunset Systems Preconfigured Linux Computers
http://www.sunsetsystems.com/ and Custom Software
======================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Benoit Timbert)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,fr.comp.os.linux.configuration
Subject: Re: modules net-pf-???
Date: 28 Mar 1999 00:13:18 GMT
On 27 Mar 1999 04:40:04 GMT, Charles Mulks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sed:
� In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
� >
� >Hi,
� >
� >I've recompiled my kernel 2.0.34 (RedHat distribution) and since then
� >I'm getting those lines almost each time I'm using some network services
� >(ftp, login, ...) :
� >
� >modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-4
� >modprobe: can't locate module net-pf-5
�
� I forget which is which, but one is ipx (Novell),
� the other is netatalk (?) (Apple)
� you probably don't need either of them
�
� >
� >I've checked again my kernel options and I was unable to find something
� >related to 'net-pf' ... I've also search in some HowTo and on the web
� >unsuccesfully :-(
check /usr/include/socketbits.h
#define PF_IPX 4 /* Novell Internet Protocol. */
#define PF_APPLETALK 5 /* Don't use this. */
so net-pf-4 is IPX
net-pf-5 is AppleTalk
--
Beno�t Timbert email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Despite so strongly the Force Yoda has,
correct order sentences ability to make he has not"
------------------------------
From: "Yannick Girard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ISA REALTEK PNP RTL8019
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 00:12:13 GMT
Hi,
I have a RTL8019 ISA card.
I've try to make it detect by
'"modprob ne io=0xNNN" It doesnt work says ne.o busy
"modprob rtl8019 io=0xNNN" doesnt work says rtl8019 module not found"
"modprob rtl8139 io=0xNNN" it says Symbol for io not found..
I Need Help!
Nothing seems to work if its the card that's not supported tell me!
Thanks i need a urgent Answer! :o|
------------------------------
From: James Beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netgear FA310TX Cards and Redhat 5.2
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 00:32:45 -0800
I've got two cards working on my system. It's RH 5.1 with a kernel
upgraded to 2.0.36. Check the chip type and its listing in the Ethernet
HOWTO. I should be listed as using the 'tulip' driver; I use the
LinuxConfig control-panel configure dialog to set it up. Should work...
Jim
------------------------------
From: "Duncan A. McRae" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Networking how-to in English?
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 19:24:11 -0500
Greetings:
I'm taking a class in Unix scripting, for which I've set up a RedHat 5.1,
2.0.34 kernel. The monitor attached to this machine is hell, and causes my
other machine to flicker like crazy. Additionally, the keyboard is crap.
Being a big adventurer, I'd like to simply set up networking on the box so I
can telnet to it from my other box. I've checked out the how-to, and it's
driving me nuts. I don't have TIME to read *46* pages of geek-speak just to
set up a telnet connection!
No, I'm not exaggerating btw; I downloaded the how-to, changed the font to
Courier New 10pt and it's 46 pages long.
Are there any networking how-to's written in PLAIN ENGLISH that aren't going
to put me to sleep inside ten minutes? I don't mind purchasing a book if I
have to. Ideally, I'm looking to find a step-by-step series of instructions
to get the network up and running inside 30 minutes. If the time ever comes
when I have to actually start networking other machines, then I'll worry
about understanding it.
Emails or replies to the group are both fine. Thanks for your help.
Cheers;
Duncan
------------------------------
From: "Dean M. Weiten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Can I use same modem to 'diald' out and to 'pap' answer?
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:25:45 -0600
Hi,
I've read articles advising me to purchase a second modem and put in a
second telephone line to my LINUX machine (RedHat 5.1), if I want to both do
'diald' out to the Internet and auto-answer for dial-in. I don't really
want to purchase another modem, or put in another phone line. Is there a
way to share the modem for these duties?
The idea here is, when I'm home, I want to use the modem for the Internet
access (and it works fine already!). When I'm at work, I'd like access to
my home network through a dial-in line, bringing up PPP, hopefully, so I can
have forwarding access to my home network.
Thanks,
Dean Weiten.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: compile errors with the kernel part of ppp2.3.5
Date: 27 Mar 1999 18:28:02 -0600
Marc Remijn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: PPP wasnt working properly on my slakware 3.6 system.
..
: building the new kernel
: This went OK but since I chose to make ppp as a module the problems came
: when doing make modules. Then I got this when ppp.c was being compiled
: (O why can't I import a text file in the body of my message with this
: #%#*(@@&& netscape mail program, well just cut and paste from less in an
: xterm)
: ppp.c: In function `ppp_init_ctrl_blk':
: ppp.c:465: structure has no member named `ddinfo'
: ppp.c:466: structure has no member named `ddinfo'
This means that the file ppp-2.3.5/linux/ppp.c was not copied to the
source tree directory /usr/src/linux/drivers/net by the "make kernel"
step of ppp-2.3.5. This is a known problem - but there's more, an error
in the ppp.c logic that activates parts of the code that depend on the
kernel version.
The full solution is to change line 3079 in the file ppp-2.3.5/linux/ppp.c
from
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < VERSION(2,1,86)
to
#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= VERSION(2,1,86)
and then copy the file to /usr/src/linux/drivers/net, overwriting the
old ppp.c there. You should then be able to compile a new kernel without
a problem.
Note that this is not a problem with the 2.2.x kernel series. Note also
that ppp-2.3.6 is out and that this problem *appears* to be fixed in it.
--
Clifford Kite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Better is the enemy of good enough. */
------------------------------
From: "William Evans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can I use same modem to 'diald' out and to 'pap' answer?
Date: 27 Mar 1999 19:47:55 -0500
>>>>> "Dean" == Dean M Weiten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dean> Is there a way to share the modem for these duties?
As long as they both use the same lockfile (something like
/var/lock/LCK..ttyS2), then there shouldn't be a problem.
Configuration of each entity can be annoying, but should work. Keep
in mind that your ppp ip-up script may want to do different things
based on whether it was started on a dialout or a dialin.
HTH
-bill
--
William Evans < william . evans @ computer . org >
------------------------------
From: Neil Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Setting Up Pipeline 25
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 00:52:56 +0000
Hey guys...
I need to get into my pipe25 via my LInux Box. Can I use seyon to do
this......if so, how?
------------------------------
From: "Arjun Banker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: athome.users-general
Subject: cable modem doesn't work under linux -- strange
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:04:09 GMT
My cable modem seems to act a bit strangely. Right now, I have my system so
that it dual boots Linux (RedHat 5.2) and Windows 98. I first installed
Windows 98, set up the network settings, and everything worked without
problem. After I installed Linux, the cable modem still worked under
Windows 98, but the cable modem didn't work under Linux. I used the same
network settings as I did in Windows 98, but in linux, it could not resolve
any dns, and when I pinged various servers to test it, it could only ping
those inside the subnetwork.
i.e.
if my ip was 24.4.29.215, i could ping 24.4.29.176, but I could not ping
24.0.12.55 or www.microsoft.com or www.redhat.com
assuming that this may be a DNS server misconfig., I rechecked the settings,
but again, they were all correct. Any suggestions?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (T. Sutherland)
Subject: can't rsh properly!
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:18:25 GMT
I have a very simple network setup. I'm connecting my Pentium to a
486DX33. Both are running RH 5.2. I have /etc/hosts identical in
both and even resolv.conf identical in both (though it's probably not
necessary on the 486 which has no modem connection). I put in a
/etc/hosts.equiv file on both. On the pentium is says keldome (the
486) and on the 486, that file says nivdome (the pentium).
>From the pentium, I can type rsh keldome [command] and everything
works. I can type rsh keldome and I open up a shell on the 486
without typing a password.
However....
>From the 486, typing rsh nivdome [command] results in permission
denied. Typing rsh nivdome from the 486 pops up a password request
that I have to answer before I can access the pentium.
I'm lost. Any suggestions?
------------------------------
From: Tommy Johnsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Login Scripts for Win98 workstation How do i do it
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 03:18:17 +0200
I have done it, it works, but it may not be the best solution. Here it
comes:
In the global section in smb.conf file add something like
security = domain
domain logons = yes
logon script = %U.bat
Add a new section like:
[netlogon]
comment = Login scripts
path = /home/samba/netlogon
writable = no
guest ok = no
Create the directory mentioned in the netlogon section and create the bat
files in it. In the above case one for each user named USERNAME.bat. To
mount home directory at th the first available drive letter in Windows put
this in the bat file:
net use * \\yoda\homes
I hope this is what is needed to make this work. You can also read more
about it in smb.conf man file in the section Explanation of each
parameter:logon script
Good Luck
--
Tommy
"Most people's favorite way to end a game is by winning."
On 26 Mar 1999, Dereks2nd wrote:
> I have a Redhat 5.2 linux server which I can access from my Win98 workstation
> no problem. However, I would like to be able to create login scripts on the
> Linux server so when my Win98 box logs in it automatically creates the
> appropriate drive mappings ( alittle like novell server login scripts, I know I
> can do it from with 98 itself but want to do it from the server to allow users
> to move from one machine to another ). I know Samba 2.0.3 handles login scripts
> but I cannot find any information as to what the command structure is. I have
> also look through the How-to sections and still cant find anything. Could
> anyone please help.
>
> Derek
> Please respond via e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Neil Chambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can't rsh properly!
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:16:46 +0000
"T. Sutherland" wrote:
> I have a very simple network setup. I'm connecting my Pentium to a
> 486DX33. Both are running RH 5.2. I have /etc/hosts identical in
> both and even resolv.conf identical in both (though it's probably not
> necessary on the 486 which has no modem connection). I put in a
> /etc/hosts.equiv file on both. On the pentium is says keldome (the
> 486) and on the 486, that file says nivdome (the pentium).
>
> From the pentium, I can type rsh keldome [command] and everything
> works. I can type rsh keldome and I open up a shell on the 486
> without typing a password.
>
> However....
>
> From the 486, typing rsh nivdome [command] results in permission
> denied. Typing rsh nivdome from the 486 pops up a password request
> that I have to answer before I can access the pentium.
>
> I'm lost. Any suggestions?
Check out the /var/log/messages with tail -f
/var/log/messages.........it will tell you why
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: help: ne2k-pci module says: resource busy
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 23:36:15 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marc Dierikx) writes:
>Hi
>I've got this ne2000 pci clone card that I wish to use with Linux.
>I tried to setup the ne2k-pci module, but it keeps saying
>that 'a device or resource is busy'.
IRQ conflict.
>There is no io address or irq to configure (it is fixed at 10).
There is another card at IRQ 10. Fix it (BIOS settings or move
cards around).
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: JCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IP masquerading & domain names
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:31:27 GMT
William Evans wrote:
>
> If you're running your own (caching) name server, you can master any
> domain you'd like. Keep in mind that it shouldn't shadow a real
> domain (therefore making the registered domain unavailable to you and
> your hidden subnet). There are advantages with running your own
> caching name server; one, apropos to this, is being able to control
> this stuff.
>
> This isn't an issue if you hard code all names into /etc/hosts,
> though. If you just put:
>
> 192.168.2.1 box1.my-own-domain.com box1
> 192.168.2.2 box2.my-own-domain.com box2
>
> on both machines, it'll work just fine.
>
> You'll probably want to muck around with /etc/resolv.conf and change
> the "search" parameter, but if you aren't running a local name server,
> then putting a fake domain in resolv.conf will waste bandwidth
> whenever you do a non-qualified hostname lookup.
>
> My box, running a caching name server, masters a domain that I call
> vabch.va.us. AFAIK, it is not a valid domain (nobody's running it),
> so I don't worry about shadowing a real one.
>
OK, thanks. Now here's what is bugging me:
Imagine that I want to run HTTP daemons in the masqueraded (?)
machine, not in the one that is doing the masquerading. httpd reads out
the local fully qualified domain name (FQDN), either from its
configuration
file or from the system, and sends it back to whatever clients use their
services.
We cannot use the FQDN of the masqueraded machine in the internal
network because, since we have complete freedom to choose it, it could
be anything. In particular, it could clash with an already existing one
(which
would not make the rightful owners of that domain very happy) or it could
correspond to a nonexisting domain (which would get the clients stymied.)
We could use the FQDN of the IP masquerading machine, but this
machine might be running its own HTTP daemons.
So, what's the way out of this?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Help me spend $2,000 on a new Linux-based computer
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:25:56 +0000
I've gotten the go-ahead from my better half (read: my wife) to spend
around 2K on a new system. I'd like to hear _specific_ success and/or
horror stories on systems and peripherals that have worked and not
worked with Linux. My prequisites:
400mhz CPU
96mb RAM
8mb video card
19" monitor
sound card, speakers
4GB hard drive
CD-ROM
Bonuses:
DVD
Color printer
Tape backup
Dual CPUs
Notes:
I don't play video games, so 3D video doesn't mean anything to me.
I'm open to build-my-own or buying from Micron, Gateway, Dell, etc.
Best regards,
Ed
Q: Why do PCs have a reset button on the front?
A: Because they are expected to run Microsoft operating systems.
------------------------------
From: "Scott Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and Cable Modem
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 20:30:19 -0500
Similar situation here, except the Windows98 box has an internal 1-way cable
modem, with a dial-up connection. Is there a way to allow the Linux box to
access the win98 connection?
Currently I'm running wingate, for another win98 client. It has a 1-user
license. Would linux be able to access the internet through wingate,
provided I have the proper settings in wingate to allow access to multiple
clients?
Or, would it be best to install the cablemodem in the linux box, and have
the 2 win98 machines run through it?
An assistance in this matter would be appreciated.
http://hawkwynd.tzo.com
My personal web server, dishing out all kinds of perl scripts..
>Yeah, that works. I'm doing the same thing, except I have three Linux
boxes
>(one's an Alpha, one's a 486 and the other is a Celery), two Macs, and two
>Windows boxes. One of the Linux boxes is *only* doing the cable modem
router
>thing, because it's just a crappy old 486 I had kicking around.
>
>The Linux box needs two ethernet cards. You have to compile the kernel to
>support IP Masquarading. Your first ethernet card, eth0, will connect to
the
>cable modem, and the second one will connect to the hub. Configure the
first
>one to get its IP via dhcpd, and assign the second one 192.168.1.1.
>
>You need a cable modem log-in client to run on the Linux box, and that will
>depend on your cable modem company. I've seen clients for @home and Time
>Warner Road Runner.
>
>Configure the other machines on your hub with ip numbers in the 192.168.1.x
>range, and have them use 192.168.1.1 as their gateway. Set their name
servers
>according to what the cable modem company tells you, or run a caching name
>server on the linux box and point them all to that.
>
>Enable IP Masquarade on the Linux box. Get isinglass from tummy.com to
keep
>script kiddies from hacking your network. Keep up to date with the latest
>Linux rpms from RedHat (assuming you're using RedHat Linux).
>
>If you don't understand anything, ask here.
>
>--
>Paul Tomblin, not speaking for anybody.
>"Faced with the prospect of rereading this book, I would rather have my
brains
>ripped out by a plastic fork." - Charles Cooper reviews the new Gates book.
>http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2230586,00.html
------------------------------
From: "Michael Harsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: IP connectivity Problem - 2.2.4 SMP + Intel EtherExpress 16
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 18:31:49 -0700
I'm having difficulty getting basic IP connectivity working on a machine I
just built. I'm running slackware 3.6, 2.2.4 SMP Kernel, and an Intel
EtherExpress 16 NIC. I'm on a private IP subnet (192.168.0.x) and I'm using
another linux machine to do IP masquerading and act as a gateway for the
private subnet (192.168.0.1).
When I boot the problem machine and try to run a network app (ping, ftp,
telnet, etc) there is a pause, then I get the following error message:
eth0: i82586 startup timed out, status 0100, resetting...
eth0: i82586 reset timed out, kicking...
eth0: i82586 reset timed out, kicking...
eth0: i82586 reset timed out, kicking...
This message repeats twice with about 20 second intervals.
I suspected a NIC hardware problem, so I ran diagnostics on the card and the
network and everything came back ok. I assume that "i82586" is the
controller chip on the NIC. I also tried switching to a non-SMP kernel with
no effect.
If anyone has a clue what I'm doing wrong, I would really appreciate some
advice. Thanks,
Michael Harsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (L J Bayuk)
Subject: Re: NFS Permission problems
Date: 28 Mar 1999 01:47:36 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I've been having a strange problem with NFS.
>
>My setup is this:
>
>/etc/exports file on server:
>/data/data0 andromeda(rw,secure,all_squash)
>
>/etc/fstab entry on workstation:
>orion:/data/data0 /mnt/data0 nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192
>
>If I am root on the Workstation and a make a new directory on the
>server,
>and then a sub directory it works fine.
>
>If I am not root, I can create a new directory on the server but
>before I
>can create a directory on that I have to chmod a+w to the original
>directory. Does anyone have a suggestion on how I can get around this?
This is normal behavior of the NFS server when you use the all_squash
option. The first directory you create gets owned by "nobody". When you
go to create the second directory, your client (not the server) checks
the permissions first and sees that you are not the owner of, and have
no write permission to, the directory you are trying to create in.
In general I think all_squash is intended for read-only access.
If you really want this to work, you can rebuild the NFS server
with the DOSHACKS option.
------------------------------
From: Chris "Cranky Spice" Harshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: winmodems
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 01:08:54 GMT
That day is still a ways off, especially when you're using the machine for
things like gaming, MP3 playback, or any other processor-intensive activity.
Try playing StarCraft with a WinModem connecting you to BattleNet (even on my
PIII-450 things don't go smoothly). WinAmp is often enough to make the modem
drop connection. There are definite problems with WinModems, and I'm going
to hang on to my external USR Courier for as long as possible.
Besides, by the time we reach the point where a WinModem's load on a CPU
won't be at all noticable, I predict most of us will be using busmastering
PCI Ethernet to connect to xDSL services, or the like...
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Carver) wrote:
> I know the Linux community thinks poorly of Winmodems and many people
> believe that winmodems shouldn't be supported on Linux even if the
> manufacturers released the information necessary to write Linux
> drivers. I read an article that suggested that software modems may be
> the wave of the future however. The author based this assertion on the
> increasing power of CPUs in single user machines and there may be some
> sense in his position. The processing power to "modem" at 56K is
> relatively constant. As CPU continue to increase it will take a
> smaller and smaller percentage of the CPU's power to do the "modem"
> work. Isn't there a point where it becomes silly to use a dedicated
> modem processor to do work that the CPU can do without adding
> noticeable load? Might we see a day when you can't buy a hardware
> modem?
====================================================+===================
R. Christopher Harshman : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | i440BX + Celeron
http://ebhon.jnst.uor.edu/~harshman ICQ 8179154 | 300a / Myst220+RR
"We danced in graveyards, with vampyres 'till dawn" | Win98 & Linux 2.2
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jesus Monroy, Jr.)
Crossposted-To: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Subject: Re: NFS problems with Linux 2.2.x server, freebsd client
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 00:43:43 GMT
On Sun, 28 Mar 1999 08:15:45 +0900, Tomoo Nomura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>> It may be broken - someone sent me this URL yesterday, which
>> may shed some light on how to fix it:
>>
>> http://lwn.net/1999/0318/a/knfsd.html
>
>I got it, but could not compile it.
>
>
>gcc -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -I../../support/include -Wall -m486 -pipe
>-DHAVE_NETGRO
>UPS -Wno-unused -c rpcmisc.c -o rpcmisc.o
>rpcmisc.c: In function `closedown':
>rpcmisc.c:118: `__kernel_fd_set' undeclared (first use this
>function)
>rpcmisc.c:118: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
>rpcmisc.c:118: for each function it appears in.)
>rpcmisc.c:118: parse error before `)'
>rpcmisc.c:118: warning: `__result' might be used uninitialized in
>this function
>make[2]: *** [rpcmisc.o] Error 1
>make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
>make: *** [all] Error 2
>
>
>Anyone has any idea ?
>
Can you repost or email original?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 12����Ů+��Ů!
Date: Saturday, 27 Mar 1999 20:25:38 -0600
******************************************************************
1.��ӭ���ʻ��������ڳ������ļ�!
�Խ�ʵ�� ɫ��ͼƬ ��ɫ��ѧ ��վ���� ����̳ ��滥��, Ӧ�о���!
http://sexprof.findhere.com
http://visitweb.com/sexprof
2.��ӭ���Ļ��������ڵ����ʼ��б�!
mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ֻҪ��E-mail�Ϳ��յ��ƽ��ڵĻ��Խ�ͼƬ��������ѧ����վ����
�Ծ��鼼�ɣ� ���������Ϣ��163&169 Proxy�ȵȣ��ö������!
3. ����ƽ������ʼ��б��ľ�Ʒ���¼�ͼƬ
http://www.eGroups.com/list/sexprof/
����ڴ˶������б�
4.��ӭ������������ڵ���ҳ��滥����ƽ�Ȼ���������������ҳ��
�����ĺû���! �����Գ�Ϊ�ƽ�����վ�ij����û�!
http://sexprof.findhere.com
http://visitweb.com/sexprof
******************************************************************
NOTHING BUT SEX! SEX! SEX!
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
