Linux-Networking Digest #665, Volume #10 Mon, 29 Mar 99 01:13:40 EST
Contents:
Setting up anonymous FTP??? (Alexis M)
Re: Networking x86 Box to Linux Box (PCC PaulB)
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... (jedi)
Re: Problem trying to start squid 2 in Linux 2.0.36 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Jchart - Linux (Paul Russo)
Re: pppd connected, but no ping? (Jack Beatty)
Re: Networking x86 Box to Linux Box (Benjamin John)
Re: Slow PPP Connection But Minicom Connection Fine (chris turner)
Re: Can't ping Windows 95 from Redhat Linux 5.2 (Hugh McCurdy)
Re: problem with d-link 530TX NIC ("D. C. & M. V. Sessions")
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... (jedi)
problem with d-link 530TX NIC ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Win98 can't find Samba server (Derek M Streeter)
Re: Another Newbie Lost In Networking Space ("Antonio")
Re: Linux into 98 ("Cameron Spitzer")
Re: Win terminal for Linux? (Jeffrey Altman)
Re: Netgear FA310TX Cards and Redhat 5.2 ("William Cameron")
Re: Linux under NT40 Proxy Server 2.0 ("Eugene")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Alexis M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Setting up anonymous FTP???
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 00:18:37 +0100
I just (re)installed Debian Linux, and I am trying to set up anonymous
FTP access to my machine.
The installation has created a /home/ftp directory, which I assume is
the directory used for anonymous FTP, but when I try to log-in to the
machine, I can't see any files when I "ls" or "dir"...
However, if I try to "cd" to a directory I know exists (eg
/home/ftp/backups), or try to "get" files, this works...
The main reason I want to fix this is to use FTP to set-up Redhat Linux
on a SparcIPX (that has no CD-ROM unfortunately). I want to mount the
Redhat CD in, say, /home/ftp/redhat, and access it via anonymous FTP
from the Sparc. But since it cant read the directories, it cant get the
files.....
Any help please?
Thanks
Alexis M
<remove "nospam." to email me directly>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (PCC PaulB)
Subject: Re: Networking x86 Box to Linux Box
Date: 29 Mar 1999 03:23:40 GMT
Hi,
I am trying to find out how I can have a folder(s) on my linux machine act as a
drive on my x86 machine which runs windows 98. I found this newsgroup in hope
that someone has done this before. If you can, please also mail the response to
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks,
Paul
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jedi)
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.windowsnt.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,micorosft.public.outlook
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 17:48:43 -0800
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 18:26:51 +0200, Matthias Warkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It was the Sun, 28 Mar 1999 18:22:52 +0300...
>...and Alexander I. Butenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ANyway I greatly doubt that Linux will be easier to use than NT Server. I'm
>> sure that NT Server will be a ideal use for a small home network, becaus
>> eit's very easy to configure comparable to Linux and supports most network
>> clients better.
>
>There posts someone who doesn't know what a Cobalt Qube or such can do
>for you - with Linux.
>
>mawa
The guys still gotta have a clue if it's on the net.
Cobalt fucked up on apache configurations for their
cubes and left open a big fat gaping hole that's not
there in the standard distribution (source).
--
"I was not elected to watch my people suffer and die |||
while you discuss this a invasion in committe." / | \
In search of sane PPP docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem trying to start squid 2 in Linux 2.0.36
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 01:06:07 GMT
Ah, I love the smell of freshly_updated_documentation first thing in the
morning.
In fact the QUICKSTART included in Squid 2 removes that particular phrase! I
have just finished comparing the QUICKSTART included in Squid 2 and Squid 1.
They are different in some areas, the above mentioned being one of them.
Since my original posting, I have figured out that I needed to include '&' to
the end of my 'squid'command. Well, you live and you learn, eh.
Thanks for everyone's responses!
--Daniel
"Of all the things I have lost, I miss my mind the most."
--Mark Twain
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7dfiup$9pi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >
> >/usr/sbin/squid -z /usr/sbin/squid as instructed in the QUICKSTART file in
> >the /usr/docs/squid directory.
> >But when I enter "squid" the
> >system churns and crunches for about 30 sec., and then silence. It never
> >concludes the command. I.e., I am not returned to a prompt
>
> You wrote that you _did_ read the QUICKSTART.
>
> Then you would have read:
>
> <cite>You should NOT get the shell prompt back: squid does not got into the
> background by default.</cite>
>
> May be you have a different QUICKSTART :-)
>
> leo
>
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Paul Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: misc.invest.technical,comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Jchart - Linux
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 20:53:47 -0500
Hi,
I making a Java TA charting application I wrote available to users of
Linux who
have the JDK or JRE 1.1.7 installed. JDK1.2 pre-release isn't quite
there yet.
Jchart is a high end charting program that does PnF charts, candlestick,
MACD,
moneyflow, and stochastics. It grabs historical end-of-day data off the
net.
If you are running Linux and would like to use Jchart the go to
http://www.jchart.com/jc-content.html and download it.
Thanks to the com.os.linux.networking community for technical support
that is better than any paid support.
Linux Rules !!
Paul Russo
------------------------------
From: Jack Beatty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: pppd connected, but no ping?
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 19:01:52 -0500
Bjorn Graabek wrote:
> I've got a connection to my ISP "working". When debugging the connection, I
> can see that I'm given an IP address, I can see the remote IP address as
> well. I can ping the local IP address I'm given, but I can't ping anything
> on the other side of the link.
>
<snip>
Make sure that you have defaultroute as a pppd option, either in your options
file or from the command line. Check to make sure that ppp has correctly
established this default route using netstat -rn. Should be something like:
0.0.0.0 999.999.999.999 0.0.0.0 UG 576 0 0
ppp0
Where the second number (all 9's) would be the ISP's side of your PPP
connection.
Additionally, you might include the log file from the debug option. I had a
similar problem, it turned out to be an IRQ problem. You can tell if it
takes along time to get establish a connection and along time when you send it
the AT command before it responds. I was using COM3/cua2 and assumed it was
IRQ4 when really the modem was set for IRQ5. You can use setserial to change
IRQ for the serial device you are using. For example to change the IRQ from
4 to 5 for cua2: setserial /dev/cua2 irq 5. If this corrects the problem,
place the command in one of your start up scripts.
Good Luck,
Jack
------------------------------
From: Benjamin John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Networking x86 Box to Linux Box
Date: 28 Mar 1999 19:40:11 PST
Set up SAMBA on the linux box
http://samba.org
regards
PCC PaulB wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to find out how I can have a folder(s) on my linux machine act as a
> drive on my x86 machine which runs windows 98. I found this newsgroup in hope
> that someone has done this before. If you can, please also mail the response to
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>
> Thanks,
> Paul
------------------------------
From: chris turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Slow PPP Connection But Minicom Connection Fine
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 20:59:03 -0500
I tried your suggestion but still get the same results (9.6K connect). I've
tried just about every variation/permutation of the chatscript, etc that I
can think of, but you gave me a hint in that this is the default connect
speed. I'm still looking...any other ideas?
Thanks again
Bill Unruh wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> chris turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >I have a USR/3Com 56K Faxmodem (ISA PnP). I have set up the correct
> >IRQs, ports, etc. and verified that they are working fine. When I dial
> >out with Minicom, I get a good connection, usually at around 50K. But
> >when I dial the same number with a chatscript running under pppd I only
> >get a 9.6K connection. I can get a 50K connection from the chatscript if
> >I run it AFTER I have dialed the same number from Minicom and then
> >exited. The modem init strings for both Minicom and chat are the same
> >(AT&F1), and I have all the settings in pppd as recommended (pppd
> >connect 'chat -v -f /etc/ppp/chatscript -detach crtscts modem
> >defaultroute /dev/modem 115200 user'myusername'). Any ideas on what is
>
> This is a strange set of commands since you never terminate the quotes
> starting just befor chat. I suspect what your pppd is getting is the
> default stuff (which is 9600 Bd).
>
> Try
> /usr/sbin/pppd /dev/ttySx 115200 defaultroute -detach crtscts connect
> "chat -f -f /etc/ppp/chatscript"
> (ttySx should be whichever port you are connected to_)
> >causing this and how to fix it?
> >Thanks in advance
> >Chris Turner
------------------------------
From: Hugh McCurdy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can't ping Windows 95 from Redhat Linux 5.2
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 01:48:41 +0000
Rory Chan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am a newbies in Linux world. Recently, I have set up a home network
> that only connect a Linux machine to a Windows 95 client. The machine that
> have Linux installed can also dual-boot to Windows 95.
>
> When I boot both machines in Windows 95, they can ping each other with
> no problem. However, while I boot one in Linux and one in 95, they can't
> ping each other. In Windows 95, ping keeps giving messages "request time
> out". In Redhat Linux, ping command has no response. Would you know what the
> reason is?
>
> I have already checked the TCP/IP settings and they are correct.
>
> Windows 95 box - IP: 192.168.1.2
> Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
>
> Linux box - IP: 192.168.1.1
> Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
>
> I also have checked the /etc/hosts in Linux and file HOSTS in Windows
> directory. They are both identical. I have added LMHOSTS in Windows already.
>
> I have added the route command - 'route add -net 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
> eth0" in Linux box.
>
> I have tried to ping the IP on their own and have no problem.
>
> Would you help me to resolve this problem? I have tried many times and the
> result is rather frustrating.
>
Since you are using Red Hat 5.2, you should use the Red Hat programs
to setup your network.
The program that I've been using for this is netcfg.
One way to do this is login as root and startx (hopefully you have
X working). Then from the control panel, use the net configuration
program. (Another way is to type netcfg at a # when running X)
On the first screen (Names)
hostname: happy.mynet.org (just an example)
domain: mynet.org
On the second screen (Hosts)
192.168.1.3 happy.mynet.org snappy
192.168.1.2 sleepy.mynet.org sleepy
On the third screen (Interfaces)
I'm assuming you are using ethernet.
I would remove your current interface and add a new one.
Type is ethernet
IP is 192.168.1.3
Mask: 255.255.255.0
I would check "activate at boot time"
On the fourth screen (routing)
This is where I don't remember for certain what is right.
I actually have a gateway setup.
What I think you do is leave this screen blank.
On my setup, I have a 3rd computer (192.168.0.1) as
the gateway with a device of eth0. So, if leaving
it blank doesn't work, you could try naming the other
computer as the gateway. (I don't think that's right,
but you could try it).
Problem is that it was last December when I setup my
network and I just don't remember all the details.
--
Hugh McCurdy
------------------------------
From: "D. C. & M. V. Sessions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: problem with d-link 530TX NIC
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 03:51:54 +0000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi... thanks for writing... do I specify it in the rc.modules? I don't
> see
> any entry relating to the Via Rhine chipset?
> I also don't see it when I ran make menuconfig. Please advise.
Assuming that there's a via-rhine.o at
/lib/modules/2.0.36-3c/net/via-rhine.o
(or whatever your kernel release is -- most recent
distributions have it)
add this to your /etc/conf.modules:
alias eth0 via-rhine
> I have anothe problem for Linux to detect my Adaptec 1520 card. It
> couldn't
> detec my scsi cd-rom drive. Ihave
> chosen the aha152x but still it could detect it. Any idea?
>
> Thank You and have a Nice Day.
>
> ----------
> > From: Nick Zentena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: problem with d-link 530TX NIC
> > Date: Sunday, March 28, 1999 10:19 PM
> >
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > >
> > >hI..
> > >I have tried to recomplie the kernel for my d-link 530TX card using
> > >DEC Tulip but still it couldn't recognise it. What should be the
> > >correct method?
> >
> > Which makes sense since thats the wrong driver. Try the Via-Rhine
> driver.
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> > --
> > ---------------------
> > Nick Zentena
> > SuSE 6.0 Linux 2.2.4
> > ---------------------
--
He either fears his fate too much, or his deserts are small,
That puts it not unto the touch to win or lose it all.
D. C. & M. V. Sessions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (jedi)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 17:47:11 -0800
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:10:30 +1200, Stuart Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Think non technical for a change. Linux is a great operating system if you
>are technically minded - which I assume all of us in this NG are ;) - but
>for ordinary small business owners, it is a complete mystery. At least
>Windows NT looks like something they know, and they don't have to learn
>command line syntaxes for doing basic admin tasks.
>
>I have no particular axe to grind with either the NT or Linux side (although
>I am a consultant for MS products), I just think there are a few linux
>zealots out there who although they have technically excellent solutions,
>fail to take into account that non techos are going to be using these
>products.
>
>Also, time for a few facts
>
>1. NO operating system is bug free
>2. Both Linux camps and MS spend considerable time locating and fixing bugs
>3. A properly configured NT box will not Blue Screen, and will be as stable
>as a well configured Linux box.
...and will be no less complicated to the 'novice user' to
deal with. That's the big problem here. When going from
userland to servers an inch might as well be a lightyear.
>
>Just my two cents worth.
>
>Stu
>Chris Mauritz wrote in message ...
>>In comp.os.linux.misc Alexander I. Butenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> ANyway I greatly doubt that Linux will be easier to use than NT Server.
>I'm
>>> sure that NT Server will be a ideal use for a small home network, becaus
>>> eit's very easy to configure comparable to Linux and supports most
>network
>>> clients better.
>>
>>Nonsense. Redhat is rather painless to setup. A novice could probably
>>have it up and running as a SOHO file server in under an hour since samba
>>comes turned on by default.
>>
>>C
>>--
>>Christopher Mauritz
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
"I was not elected to watch my people suffer and die |||
while you discuss this a invasion in committe." / | \
In search of sane PPP docs? Try http://penguin.lvcm.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: problem with d-link 530TX NIC
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 02:51:39 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi... thanks for writing... do I specify it in the rc.modules? I don't
see
any entry relating to the Via Rhine chipset?
I also don't see it when I ran make menuconfig. Please advise.
I have anothe problem for Linux to detect my Adaptec 1520 card. It
couldn't
detec my scsi cd-rom drive. Ihave
chosen the aha152x but still it could detect it. Any idea?
Thank You and have a Nice Day.
==========
> From: Nick Zentena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: problem with d-link 530TX NIC
> Date: Sunday, March 28, 1999 10:19 PM
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >
> >hI..
> >I have tried to recomplie the kernel for my d-link 530TX card using
> >DEC Tulip but still it couldn't recognise it. What should be the
> >correct method?
>
> Which makes sense since thats the wrong driver. Try the Via-Rhine
driver.
>
> Nick
>
>
> --
> ---------------------
> Nick Zentena
> SuSE 6.0 Linux 2.2.4
> ---------------------
------------------------------
From: Derek M Streeter <"streeter"@@iname.com>
Subject: Re: Win98 can't find Samba server
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 02:48:08 GMT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------------------------------
From: "Antonio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Another Newbie Lost In Networking Space
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 05:08:40 GMT
You may want to check out "Linux Network Toolkit" by Paul Sery. It walks you
through setting up a Linux server with windows clients. And then goes on to
connecting your network to the internet and setting up a firewall.
The book is expensive (about $45) but in my opion well worth it.
------------------------------
From: "Cameron Spitzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux into 98
Date: 29 Mar 1999 02:29:52 GMT
In article <7dmk97$rsu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Donald E. Stidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Or you can get it at www.wingate.com
>
>Works great with Win98 machines, but still haven't figured out how to get my
>linux box to use it except as a DHCP server. There are 3 versions, and I
>
>David Nillesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> Matt Anderson wrote:
>
>> Do a search for a program called "wingate". i think www.tucows.comm may
>have a
>> copy of it.
>> Its bastardized ip masquerading for windows.
Beware. Wingate "out of the box" has security problems.
You might find your computer being used by some spammer to conceal
his dialup IP number when he hijacks the Baton Rouge public
library's server to send his porno spam.
You'll have to configure it not to do stuff like that.
Cameron
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeffrey Altman)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: Win terminal for Linux?
Date: 29 Mar 1999 05:12:29 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kevin White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Hi, I love using my linux box, but sometimes have to work on the other
: boxes (Win95 or WinNT). I would like to be able to do my linux "work"
: (emacs, compiling, working with files that are on my linux box, etc.)
: from the Win95 or NT box. Is this possible? Is this what a "terminal
: emulator" is for? (Sorry, I'm quite a newbie to this stuff). So, if a
: terminal emulator program is the right tool for the job, is there a free
: one available for nt/95? If there is a better way to do this, please
: offer whatever suggestions you can.
Kermit 95 provides terminal emulation of the Linux Console.
See http://www.kermit-project.org/k95.html for details.
It will allow you to remotely connect via telnet, rlogin, or dialup
and perform your work.
Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer * Kermit-95 for Win32 and OS/2
The Kermit Project * Columbia University
612 West 115th St #716 * New York, NY * 10025
http://www.kermit-project.org/k95.html * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "William Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Netgear FA310TX Cards and Redhat 5.2
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 22:07:52 -0500
Reply-To: "William Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for your help. I have been successful in getting the cards to be
recognized by their respective computers, however, I am unable to
successfully ping the one computer from the other. I have tried connecting
the cable directly and also through the hub. I have added the IP address
(192.168.0.2) to the host file and the resolv.conf files, but still no ping.
I have tried pinging from the Windows 98 computer to my linux server
(192.168.0.1) without success. I ma not sure if I have to adjust Windows 98
to look for the linux server (192.168.0.1) or not.
Help !
William Cameron
Peter C. DuCharme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:5tsL2.101$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have the same network card and RH5.2 and was able to get the card
working
> by following the instructions included on the included diskette. Look in
the
> file "A:\HELP\LINUX\LINUX.txt". I also had to create a "/etc/resolv.conf"
> so that "dhcpcd" would get an ip address dynamically from Road Runner.
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux under NT40 Proxy Server 2.0
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 05:32:02 GMT
just set up Netscape to go through the proxy
--
"Ein Folk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
"One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft's slogan
Dante A. Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi,
> I am running a small home network, i have one physical connection to the
> Internet by Mediaone (cable), this connection go to and NT40 Proxy
> Server, from the Proxy server go to a HUB connecting 4 clients, a mix of
> Windows NT and Windows 95. I recently purchased Linux from Red Hat 5.2 i
> also add and extra HD dedicated to Linux, installed Linux and now i have
> to get access to the Internet trought the NT Proxy Server, is this
> possible? if so what i have to do for this to work.
> The Proxy Server configuration is as follow, the first NIC is the
> default setup from MediaOne, the second is TCP/IP number: 192.168.0.1,
> Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0, Default Gateway: Blank, under DNS tab
> Hostname: ProxyNetServer, Domain: MyDomain.
>
> Thank You.
>
> Dante.
>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************