Linux-Networking Digest #675, Volume #10 Tue, 30 Mar 99 08:13:31 EST
Contents:
Looking for a proxy software (Mark Lin)
Re: kernel: ip_masq_new(proto=TCP): no free ports. ("Leopold Toetsch")
Terminal stays active (Pieter Dumon)
Switching hubs question? (MegaSurge)
DHCP client and server for same machine ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: ECommerce on LINUX {CAW} (Bill Stephens)
Re: can't get client adress problem ("Curt")
Re: crashing when entering after login: window manager problem... ("Curt")
Re: ECommerce on LINUX {CAW} (Desmond Coughlan)
Re: Machine name themes - what do you use? (John Thompson)
Accessing same HD by Linux & WinNT ("Steven R. Levitt")
Re: Help me spend $2,000 on a new Linux-based computer (Sinuhe)
Re: PPP IP address (Bullwinkle)
PPP demand dial/network problem ("Larry Daberko")
Re: Routing and Linux ("Curt")
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... ("Alexander I. Butenko")
Connecting To The Internet Using Linux Redhat 5.2---Newbie Needs Help Pls! ("a
brewster")
Re: Accessing same HD by Linux & WinNT ("Bill Garrett")
Re: BIND for SlackWare (Jon Barnett)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Lin)
Subject: Looking for a proxy software
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:21:36 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I use to use MS-Proxy 2.0, which worked well with just about all
applications includeing games. AFter migrateing to linux (useing IP
Masq), the most of the games that I play over the MSProxy like
starcraft cease to work or will not work properly. The reason I
switched is because MSProxy was very slow and required alot of system
resource. So can anyone recommend a proxy software for Linux will
provide the cability that msproxy did.
Thanks
Mark Lin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Leopold Toetsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: kernel: ip_masq_new(proto=TCP): no free ports.
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 20:54:24 +0200
Brian Turner wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> How does your /etc/route.conf look like?
>(192.168.192.0 is, naturally, our internal network)
>
>external.network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 eth1
In my route.conf, I have only the gateway here, not the network:
192.168.2.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 eth1
My Gateway is on a different net, not shure about yours (no -n !!)
>
>> How do you start masquerading & firewall (ipfwadm ...) ?
>ipfwadm and insmod (for the masq modules)
>
And you are masquerading your internal net?
leo
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Pieter Dumon)
Subject: Terminal stays active
Date: 30 Mar 1999 06:30:55 GMT
We have a problem in here with our small LAN server. We have telnet
accounts from the PCs in the LAN to the Linux server. When they log out,
the connection still seems to exist. So, 'who' also returns users that
have logged out eg an hour before. It can get really bad, up to a 1day
delay between logging out and really not being in the 'who'-list.
This gets annoying because one can get messages from users that are not
logged in anymore. Talks crash too. When one tries to talk with another
user on the network, user names are cludged - even using the tty device
as a parameter to 'talk' does not work.
The system is a Slackware distribution updated with a 2.0.36 kernel.
Does anyone know of this problem?
Thanks,
Pieter
========================================
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://studwww.rug.ac.be/~pdumon
ICQ : 12428974
=======================================
------------------------------
From: MegaSurge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Switching hubs question?
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 14:03:29 -0800
I don't know much about switching hubs and I was wondering what kind of
performance would I see if I used them? I currently have 2 servers with
70 user workstations running over a 10Mbit network. (Yes, that would be
ten.) I know, I know. Anyway, two of my four hubs can be turned into
switching hubs but would it be worth my wilds to spend the couple grand to
do this? I mean, how much network performance improvement would I see?
Please send me any information/links/comments/or experiencing possible so
that I can make my decision. Thank You.
"If there is a *quintessential zone of human privacy* it is the mind."
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: DHCP client and server for same machine
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 07:21:38 GMT
I have been using the dhcpm client with athome for some time now with @home
service using the -h option.
I have just gotten a laptop and would like to use a DHCP server so that
I don't have to change the network configuration and reboot in Windows
when I am at home or at work.
I have installed the dhcpd program and set it up for the internal network.
I followed the howto and installed a route as follows
/sbin/route add -host 255.255.255.255 dev eth1
and then started dhcpd
/usr/sbin/dhcpd eth1
The client machines seem to work fine. My problem is that I don't
think that DHCP works on the external machine. I tried
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifdown eth0 and
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup et0
I get DHCP failed message. I assume this is because of the route I added.
Is there any way to get this to work?
Also, does anyone know what port DHCP uses so I can block outgoing packets
from interfering with @home in case I screw up?
TIA
Jeff
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Bill Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ECommerce on LINUX {CAW}
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 11:42:13 GMT
I second that, I would be very interested in a howto, if someone has one.
-Bill Stephens
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
joven wrote:
> look at this site:
> www.internet-appliance.com/trial2
>
> The Lone Scribe wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
> > <7cogd3$1gc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >Ok gang, what do I need to have fired up to run an ecommerce server with
> > apache
> > >and Linux?
> >
> > Hire someone who knows what they're doing and can program and set up (and
> > maintain) the site for you. There are no 'ecommerce is on now' packages
> > included in most linux distros to just fire up and start making money.
------------------------------
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can't get client adress problem
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 07:12:44 -0500
Here is what I understand to be happening:
This usually occurs when your server can't verify the address/name of the
requesting client. When a client makes a connection the tcpwrappers
tries to verify the user isn't spoofing by doing an name lookkup on the IP
presented by the client, then a reverse name lookup to make sure the IP
is correct. You can control what IPs or domains can connect to your
system via the /etc/hosts.allow file.
You get these errors when a connecting host does not have a DNS entry.
A local ISP near here added a bank of 56K modems, but apparently has never
added these ports/hiosts to their DNS. At least that seems to be what the
problem is to
me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7dqc1r$ptb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Can somebody plz tell me where the following errors / warnings in my syslog
>come from?
>
>syslog snippet:
>
>in.pop3d[21003]: warning: can't get client address: Connection reset by
peer
>in.pop3d[21451]: warning: can't get client address: Connection timed out
>in.pop3d[21467]: warning: can't get client address: No route to host
>in.pop3d[21480]: warning: can't get client address: No route to host
>
><snap>
><snap>
>
>sendmail[9816]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): getrequests: accept: No route to
host
>
>These errors occur when users using various ISP's pop their mail from our
>server. Does this have something to do with IDENTD or some firewall
thingie?
>
>Please light me up on this one.
>
>Hans Rakers, Clubned - the Netherlands
>
>Please reply to : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
------------------------------
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: crashing when entering after login: window manager problem...
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 07:14:25 -0500
Try this.
Boot up in single user mode.
lilo: linux single
Alessandro Magni wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Due to a bad configuration (probably), any time I login (graphical login
>
>screen, redhat 5.2) Linux tries to switch to some odd resolution,
>monitor flickers, something bad happens... and I come back to login. No
>way to login in text mode due to my init files that make everybody login
>
>directly in X (I'll never do it again, swear!).
>
>Does somebody know how to login in text only mode, to resolve my
>problem? HELP ME!
>
>
>Many thanks,
>
> Alessandro
>
>--
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>\ Alessandro Magni
>/ IEN Galileo Ferraris
>\ c.M.d'Azeglio 42, 10125 Torino (ITALIA)
>/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>\ Fax (39)11-6507611
>/ Tel (39)11-3919757
>\ Homepage at:
>http://alpha.ien.it/~magni/home.html
>/
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
------------------------------
From: Desmond Coughlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ECommerce on LINUX {CAW}
Date: 30 Mar 1999 14:12:59 +0200
Bill Stephens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I second that, I would be very interested in a howto, if someone has one.
I seem to remember an advert in Linux Journal a while back for a RH
Secure Server. I daresay there is more information to be had on their
website.
[snip]
--
Desmond Coughlan |Restez zen ... Linux peut le faire
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[www site under construction]
------------------------------
From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
vmsnet.networks.misc,comp.unix.solaris,comp.os.os2.networking.server,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.networking,comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Subject: Re: Machine name themes - what do you use?
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 19:53:31 -0600
Clay Calvert wrote:
>
> Using grandmothers' names will allow you to have two more machines.
> Any sisters?
>
> On Sat, 27 Mar 1999 19:06:35 -0500, "Duncan A. McRae"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I always named my machine after my mother, being the first important woman
> >in my life. When I got a network, I was going to name machines after
> >significant girlfriends. Unfortunately, I didn't start networking until
> >after I was married. That was find for the second machine (wife's name) and
> >even the third (daughter), but now I'm stuck -- do I find another theme, or
> >have an affair in order to name machine #4? Or, almost as bad, do I simply
> >name a machine after an ex- and deal with the inevitable hail of nasty
> >looks?
Once again, the benefit of planning ahead becomes apparent.
Can it be any wonder that Novell is based in Utah?
--
-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: "Steven R. Levitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Accessing same HD by Linux & WinNT
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 12:26:37 GMT
I have Linux installed on a 340 mb HD in an old 486 box. My NT 4.0 box,
which hosts a peer-to-peer network, has an extra 3.8 gb that I would like to
partition equally between NTFS, FAT, and EXT2 partitions.
Primarily, I wish to store Linux executables on the EXT2 partition, as an
extension to the Linux box. I'm not talking about dual booting between OS's
here. The idea is to enable simultaneous access of the same HD by different
OS's.
Am I asking for trouble?
--
Steve Levitt
Colonia, NJ
------------------------------
From: Sinuhe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Help me spend $2,000 on a new Linux-based computer
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 12:20:34 GMT
In article <7dkb1h$l9v$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Rod Roark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I've gotten the go-ahead from my better half (read: my wife) to spend
> >around 2K on a new system. I'd like to hear _specific_ success and/or
> >horror stories on systems and peripherals that have worked and not
> >worked with Linux. My prequisites: ...
>
> My biggest success spending that much was getting my wife a diamond
> anniversary ring that she didn't expect. :-)
>
> -- Rod
Where is the room for the HD and CPU, etc? Where is that technol.? ;o)
Nathan Letwory
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acropolis/3089, http://come.to/Letwory
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*He decided to live forever, or die in the attempt*
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bullwinkle)
Subject: Re: PPP IP address
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:25:15 GMT
On Mon, 29 Mar 1999 14:22:26 -0500, "R. Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I connect with PPP and am going to Cable Modem with
>DHCP.
>I need a way to obtain the IP address as a system variable
>so I can use IP chains to block connections to my box.
>Does anyone know if it is stored in some variable or
>a util to get it stored?
>
>Thanks
>
>Randall
You can use the following script (change ppp0 to your Cable Modem
Interface (I use a modem here):
#!/bin/sh
##########################################################################
# Obtain our IP from inet connection
IP=`ifconfig ppp0| grep inet| cut -f2 -d:| cut -f1 -d" "`
##########################################################################
------------------------------
From: "Larry Daberko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP demand dial/network problem
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 03:43:17 -0500
I'm trying to set up an old 486 to do IP masquerading for several computers.
Currently, I'm using Win95 to test the gateway and having problems with not
being able to ping the Linux computer from Windows.
Using Slackware 3.6.
PPPD 2.3.6 compiled into the kernel.
Network set up on 192.168.0.x.
Configured PPP using pppsetup.
PPP connects to ISP ok.
Starting ppp manually from the prompt works. I am able to use the Windows
computer to surf the net, email,etc. Local network works fine.
Starting ppp with the -d demand dialing option is where the problem starts.
When I do this: Pinging on the local network does not work from Linux or
Windows (timed out). Pinging the internet from Windows does not work (no
response).
Pinging the internet from Linux DOES work. This causes pppd to bring up the
link and connect. After the connection is made, the problems disappear and
the local network / internet works fine. IP masquerading works good also.
After wresting with the whole masquerading stuff for a month, this has got
me stumped. Can anybody give me a starting point to look for solutions?
Config files are below...
Thanks for any help,
Larry
/etc/ppp/options.demand
lock
defaultroute
noipdefault
modem
/dev/cua3
115200
crtscts
debug
passive
asyncmap 0
name "username"
ipcp-accept-local
ipcp-accept-remote
0.0.0.0:10.10.10.10
demand
idle 600
connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/ppp/pppscript"
/etc/ppp/pppscript
TIMEOUT 60
ABORT ERROR
ABORT BUSY
ABORT "NO CARRIER"
ABORT "NO DIALTONE"
"" "AT&FL1H0"
OK "atdt<phone number>"
TIMEOUT 75
CONNECT
/etc/rc.d/rc.local
#ip masquerade firewall rules
ipfwadm -F -p deny
ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -S 192.168.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
#turn on ppp demand dialing
ppp-go -d
------------------------------
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Routing and Linux
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 07:35:49 -0500
With RH, using the network configuration utility under X, just select 'set
default route' option, for the ppp0 interface.
*** wrote in message <7dph04$p7l$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello.
>
>I am Linux/Redhat Distribution user. I have set up a ppp connection to the
>internet and I am able to connect to my internet service provider.
However,
>I continue to have problems using Netscape Navigator. When I try to
connect
>to a website using Netscape and while being connected to my internet
>provider, the following message appears:
>
> Netscape is unable to locate the server:
> home.netscape.com
> The server does not have a DNS entry.
> Check the server name in the Location (URL)
> and try again.
>
>I know that I have to make the appropriate "route" which will enable me to
>use Netscape Navigator. When I type route at the command prompt, I get the
>following information.
>
>Kernal IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
>Iface
>127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0
>0 2 Io
>
>I need an additional line added to the bottom of the previous line that
>should look something like this.
>
>Kernal IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
>Iface
>127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0
>0 2 Io
>201.112.101.1 * 0.0.0.0 U 0
>0 7 ppp0
>
>However, I don't know how to add the additional line. I have gone through
>endless documentation with little help. Can somebody help me this? I
desire
>the specific line command that I should use and not a general answer to my
>question.
>
>Thank-you very much for your time.
>
>
>Sean.
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Alexander I. Butenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 15:01:55 +0300
Crossposted-To:
microsoft.public.windowsnt.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.setup,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
John Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> vaclav vyvoda wrote in message ...
> >..and thank you for the typical MS PR BS..
>
> Well..., he started out telling the truth...
> >
> >On Alexander I. Butenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >: ANyway I greatly doubt that Linux will be easier to use than NT Server.
> I'm
>
>
> It IS easier to get an NT box running and doing common tasks.
>
> Getting it running RIGHT, without BSOD's and other annoyances, is often
> another kettle of fish, especially when bringing more services online that
> just what comes in the NT package.
>
> The sad fact, STILL, is that Linux is a pain in the ass to install and
> configure unless you know what you're doing.
> And THAT fact is what is keeping Linux from making inroads into markets
like
> small business and home networks.
>
> That said, there are a few products available that shield the user from
most
> of this complexity. The Cobalt Qube and Corel Netwinder are two examples
of
> how it SHOULD be. Maybe its too much to expect from the Linux development
> community, and we'll just have to rely on profiteers who understand the
> needs and wants of the marketplace better.
>
> >: sure that NT Server will be a ideal use for a small home network,
becaus
> >: eit's very easy to configure comparable to Linux and supports most
> network
> >: clients better.
>
>
> Rubbish. NT is expensive in itself. It demands more expensive hardware to
> deliver an equal level of performance. What network clients does Linux not
> support?
>
I;m not discussing the price but the complexity of the Setup.
Also cna you say that Unix SAMBA works as good with Windows clients as teh
Native NT Server?
How about Macintosh clients?
>
------------------------------
From: "a brewster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Connecting To The Internet Using Linux Redhat 5.2---Newbie Needs Help Pls!
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 12:33:57 GMT
I've successfully install Linux Redhat 5.2 but unable to connect to the
internet using it. I can connect to the internet using windows. But when I
try to do so with Linux, it dials the number, then you hear the squarking
noise. Then silence. AT this time I try to "ping" the server to see if it
is working only to hear the computer redialing. So basically, it calls the
number and then it hangs up. To set up, I used the configurator and set up
"ppp". The ISP I use says they use "chap" and not "pap". During setup, I
did not see any tab for "chap" so I assumed it default to "chap", if I did
not check the "pap" tab. Totally new to Linux and totally lost. Been try
to get this to work for weeks....no more hairs left to pull out. Can anyone
help? Pls remember that I am new, really new and really lost.
Royn
------------------------------
From: "Bill Garrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.redhat,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Accessing same HD by Linux & WinNT
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 13:42:58 +0100
Hi Steven,
This may sound obvious and I am sure you have thought about it but why not
just use Samba and mount the volume on the Linux box using an NT share ?
If your talking about sharing the HDD across one physical bus then I
wouldn't be sure that it is possible without some proprietary hardware
involved and that would obviously be expensive. I can think of any solution
that wouldn't use SCSI or FC-AL and be provided by some-one like your
DEC/EMC/IBM/BoxHill's of this world.
Bill
Steven R. Levitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<1q3M2.13380$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> I have Linux installed on a 340 mb HD in an old 486 box. My NT 4.0 box,
> which hosts a peer-to-peer network, has an extra 3.8 gb that I would like
to
> partition equally between NTFS, FAT, and EXT2 partitions.
>
> Primarily, I wish to store Linux executables on the EXT2 partition, as an
> extension to the Linux box. I'm not talking about dual booting between
OS's
> here. The idea is to enable simultaneous access of the same HD by
different
> OS's.
>
> Am I asking for trouble?
>
> --
>
> Steve Levitt
> Colonia, NJ
>
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Barnett)
Subject: Re: BIND for SlackWare
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 08:41:27 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, JCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi. I recently downloaded the latest version of BIND 8. The
>> Installation instructions say that it works with RED HAT. Will it work
>> with SlackWare too?
>>
>
> It will. However, the BIND distribution bundled with the Slackware
>distribution already is version 8; at least mine is, and I installed it over
>a year ago.
Just in case you haven't checked Cert lately you should upgrade to Bind 8.1.2
to avoid some security holes in earlier versions of Bind. See
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-98.05.bind_problems.html for more
information. I think someone has actually written a worm that exploits this
hole.
Best regards,
JonB.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************