Linux-Networking Digest #808, Volume #10 Sat, 10 Apr 99 08:14:41 EDT
Contents:
Setup 2nd NIC 3c509 (M)
Re: Home Network Help (RE) ("apraetor")
Re: New To Linux questions... ("apraetor")
Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment.... (dylan pringle)
Help needed with PPP to NT- server not responding! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
smbclient / smbmount again: Win95 works, NT doesn't !??? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Dialing into Linux box (Det 1 SOG)
Re: 3C509B NIC Problem... (M)
Re: 3c509B and 3c905B in same box (M)
What is net-pf-4 and net-pf-5? DHCP? ("Todd Osborne")
PPP and chat script problem ("Lee Howes")
Re: How to send HTML Mail (Erik Hensema)
Re: RH5.2 is driving me nuts! (Robbert Muller)
Re: Help: tunneling http through home firewall to internal server ("William R.
Mattil")
PLIP and kernel 2.2.4 (Erik-Jan Sinke)
Re: Samba works, now I want to go the other way (Richard Torkar)
Re: What is net-pf-4 and net-pf-5? DHCP? ("Greg")
Re: Telnet/ftp to linux server: login incorrect (razoon)
Re: NT Server - Linux Internet Wiorksation ("Curt")
Re: Noticing a pattern: Red Hat + ethernet + 3c509 family = net (Chris MacKenzie)
Re: Accessing Linux server remotely (George Dau)
InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P (InocuLAN)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Setup 2nd NIC 3c509
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 15:25:57 +0800
Hi,
I wish to add a 2nd NIC 3c509 as eth1 to my Linux box which is using a
3c905b as eth0 to connect with another PC. 3c509 is not pnp, so needless
to disable it and I check the io address and irq by the 3com utility.
After I did the following steps,...
1. edit /etc/lilo.conf, added...
append="ether=0,0,eth1"
2. edit /etc/conf.modules
alias eth0 3c59x
options eth0 full_duplex=1 options=20
alias eth1 3c509
options io=0x300 irq=10
There is no any message about 3c509 on boot up messages, and so I
couldn't make any ifconfig for eth1. What do I miss to do?
Thanks a lot
Mark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "apraetor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Home Network Help (RE)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 00:45:44 -0400
help people please. I am trying to set up my linux Pc to be a gateway
server. Eth0 is on 208.233.115.231 and Eth1 is on 192.168.0.x and everything
else is set right, but every time I boot eth0 comes up as being disabled.
why? and if i set up RedHat linux 5.2 to be a server machinje, do I still
need to compile ipmasq and TCP/IP into the kernel?
I'm new at this. sorry if I sound clueless. thanks.
------------------------------
From: "apraetor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: New To Linux questions...
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 00:47:30 -0400
tyoe "setup" at the prompt and run xconfigurator from there.
------------------------------
From: dylan pringle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Using Linux instead of NT Server in home environment....
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 14:57:55 +1000
Jon-o Addleman wrote:
> Once upon a Tue, 6 Apr 1999 12:43:13 +0200, "Jan Johansson"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Correct. Not a bug, that was the way MS wanted it.. and it makes sense to me
> >atleast.
>
> Really? Why would they want it to be impossible to save your password
> unless a particular protocol was in place? It makes llittle sense to
> me... the dial up networking has nothing to do with the network
> protocol that it uses. Please explain this to me!
> --
>
> Jon-o Addleman
It is clearly part of a massive conspiricy - ms,cia,asio ect. They want your
password man. - no, seriously- they do.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Help needed with PPP to NT- server not responding!
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 08:48:35 GMT
Hi!
I'm trying to set up a ppp connection to a nt server (no callback) but it
doesn't work and please someone help me if you can.
The problem is that the nt server is not responding to lcp config
requests.
that's my /var/log/messages
Apr 10 00:21:32 funky kernel: PPP: ppp line discipline successfully
unregistered
Apr 10 00:24:55 funky kernel: CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the
University of California
Apr 10 00:24:55 funky kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
allocation)
Apr 10 00:24:55 funky kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code
copyright 1995 Caldera, Inc.
Apr 10 00:24:55 funky kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
Apr 10 00:24:55 funky kernel: registered device ppp0
Apr 10 00:24:55 funky pppd[1331]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Apr 10 00:24:56 funky chat[1333]: timeout set to 90 seconds
Apr 10 00:24:56 funky chat[1333]: abort on (ERROR)
Apr 10 00:24:56 funky chat[1333]: send (+++ATZ^M)
Apr 10 00:24:56 funky chat[1333]: expect (OK)
Apr 10 00:25:15 funky chat[1333]: +++ATZ^M^M
Apr 10 00:25:15 funky chat[1333]: OK
Apr 10 00:25:15 funky chat[1333]: -- got it
Apr 10 00:25:15 funky chat[1333]: send (ATX^M)
Apr 10 00:25:15 funky chat[1333]: expect (OK)
Apr 10 00:25:15 funky chat[1333]: ^M
Apr 10 00:25:35 funky chat[1333]: ATX^M^M
Apr 10 00:25:35 funky chat[1333]: OK
Apr 10 00:25:35 funky chat[1333]: -- got it
Apr 10 00:25:35 funky chat[1333]: send (ATDT28^M)
Apr 10 00:25:35 funky chat[1333]: expect (CONNECT)
Apr 10 00:25:35 funky chat[1333]: ^M
Apr 10 00:26:05 funky chat[1333]: ATDT28^M^M
Apr 10 00:26:05 funky chat[1333]: CONNECT
Apr 10 00:26:05 funky chat[1333]: -- got it
Apr 10 00:26:05 funky chat[1333]: send (^M)
Apr 10 00:26:05 funky pppd[1331]: Serial connection established.
Apr 10 00:26:15 funky pppd[1331]: Using interface ppp0
Apr 10 00:26:15 funky pppd[1331]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/cua2
Apr 10 00:26:15 funky pppd[1331]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2ab569f5> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 10 00:26:45 funky pppd[1331]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2ab569f5> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 10 00:27:15 funky pppd[1331]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x2ab569f5> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 10 00:27:25 funky pppd[1331]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Apr 10 00:27:25 funky pppd[1331]: Modem hangup
Apr 10 00:27:25 funky pppd[1331]: Connection terminated.
Apr 10 00:27:26 funky pppd[1331]: Exit.
Apr 10 00:28:55 funky kernel: PPP: ppp line discipline successfully
unregistered
that's my options file:
lock
defaultroute
0.0.0.0:0.0.0.0
modem
/dev/cua2
115200
crtscts
debug
pap-max-authreq 29
pap-restart 20
lcp-echo-failure 40
lcp-echo-interval 20
lcp-max-configure 60
lcp-restart 30
name "m.szymczak"
remotename server.pfeilheim.sth.ac.at
I already tried many variations of lcp-restart etc. but the nt server does
not respond or i get a lcp timeout. I have 2.0.36 kernel
Can anyone help me with this problem?
Thanx in advance!!
mirek szymczak
_______________________________________________________________
www: http://www.wu-wien.ac.at/usr/h97a/h9750364/
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: 01 401 75 1948
_______________________________________________________________
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: smbclient / smbmount again: Win95 works, NT doesn't !???
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 20:05:30 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I gained some more experience and can describe my problem clearer now. I have a
linux box with SuSE 6.0, kernel 2.2.5, Samba 2.03 in a mixed NT / Win95 network.
The linux box works ok, http, telnet, ftp, and is visible from the Windows
world. The services provided by Samba work too. Just I can't see any NT shares
from the linux side ! When I do smbclient -L localhost, I see my workgroup, but
just the Win95 boxes in it. My NT workstation I cannot see. Encrypted password
is enabled.
Now I use the tool LinNeighborhood (very nice) to get a GUI view. It shows the
same, but also allows me to open the NT domain tree. There I can find my NT box,
but without any shares !
Any hints are welcome !
Regards, Eggert
=====================================================
Answers please in this newsgroup!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=====================================================
------------------------------
From: Det 1 SOG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dialing into Linux box
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 18:48:13 GMT
In article <ahhje7.fa5.ln@localhost>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Det 1 SOG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> : In article <01be77dd$d8cf61e0$227bcdd0@PANTHER>,
> : "Russell S. DiPesa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> : > To all,
> : > I have RH5.2 and am trying to dial into the modem that I have connected
> : to
> : > it. I have added the necessary line to "inittab" to respawn mgetty for
> : > each new call. I am able to dial the modem and get a handshake from it.
> : > But, after attempting to negotiate the username and password, it
> : > disconnects. I believe I have the proper permissions set for the username
> : > that I am dialing in with. Any suggestions?
> :
> : I am having the same problem with mgetty. RH 5.2, I've been trying to solve
> : this problem for approx 2 weeks, I have read every howto, man page, and news
> : group and still don't have the solution.
>
> Y'all need to post more information than "I have it set up correctly, but it
> still doesn't work". It works for me, so therefore y'all don't have it set up
> correctly!
>
> Post the line you added to /etc/inittab. Here's mine:
>
> # Start a getty on the modem line
> m1:2345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty ttyS1 DT19200
>
> The "DT19200" references a line in /etc/gettydefs.
>
> If you still can't get it to work, look in /var/log/messages for relevant
> messages. And, if you don't know what the messages mean, post 'em.
>
> Stu
>
To: Stu]
Thanks for the reply Stu
I didn't mean to give the impression
that anything was set up correctly,
that is where I,m trying to get to though.
Here is my inittab entry
# Start a getty on the modem line
S1:2345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty ttyS1 DT19200
here are messages from messages log
mgetty(400): init chat failed, exiting...: Interrupted system call
mgetty)400): failed in mg_init_data, dev=ttyS1, pid=400
Thanks for helping
Bob M.
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: 3C509B NIC Problem...
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 16:37:41 +0800
Well, you don't need to disable the PnP in MB BIOS. But you have to disable the
PnP on 3c905b by configure program from 3com running on Windowns95 / DOS.
mark @ chevalier.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried even downloading the latest driver from Vortex site but I faced the
> same problem.
>
> Finally I could get it working by disabling PNP from BIOS. I am using a HP
> Pavilion 8380 PC. There was an option in the BIOS, PNP aware OS. I set it to
> "NO" and it started working. What does this imply?. Linux doesn't understand
> PNP or this PC's BIOS has problem working with Linux.
>
> Can I enable the PNP option and still be able to make this driver work in
> Linux?.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Mohan.
>
> >
> > > Has anyone familiar with this problem?. Do I need to disable plug and play
> > > stuff?.
> >
> > I've got the 3590B-TX as well, and I didn't have any probelms with it -
> > I've still got Pnp running too.
> >
> > The only thing I can recommend is to try playing around with the legacy
> > & PnP setting on IRQs in your BIOS settings, that may help (I set all
> > mine to Pnp except IRQ5 for my SB16).
> >
> > I noticed that your using v0.99e, I'm use v0.99H. You may want to get
> > the latest drivers from
> > http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html. You didn't
> > mention which kernel your using but I know that v2.2.x uses the v0.99H
> > of the 3c59x driver.
> >
> > --
> > Rgds,
> > Chris MacKenzie
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 3c509B and 3c905B in same box
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 16:38:29 +0800
I wish to add 2nd NIC 3c509 to my Linux box which is using 3c905b.
Step1. edit /etc/lilo.conf, added...
append="ether=0,0,eth1"
Step2. edit /etc/conf.modules, so it is...
alias eth0 3c59x
options eth0 full_duplex=1 options=20
alias eth1 3c509
options io=0x300 irq=10
There is still no any message about 3c509 on bootup messages.
What file do I miss to edit?
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Larry Benoit wrote:
> Chip Roberson wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just installed Linux a few days ago in my Dell with the 3Com
> > 3c509B-TPO (ISA) card. Everything
> > worked well. Today, I installed a second nic, a 3Com 3c905B-TX (PCI).
> > I just learned that this is
> > not a "Tier 1 supported hardware" device according to RedHat. (Why?)
> >
> > There is no specific module for the 3c905B in the kerneld configurator,
> > so I have a few questions.
> >
> > 1) Will the 509 and 905 use the same driver? I don't think so, but want
> > to double check.
> >
> > 2) If so, will I have to recompile the kernel? Why, and what would I
> > have to do to make sure the
> > NICs are supported properly?
> >
> > 3) If not, where do I get the driver module for the 905? Does the
> > 3c59x.c driver at http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
> > support the
> > 905B? I wasn't sure if that one driver supports all the NICs.
> >
> > 4) Where can I find steps to installing the new driver?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Chip
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Chip Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Linux Administrator
> > Home
> > Office
> >
> > Chip Roberson
> > Linux Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Home
> > Office
> > Petaluma Netscape Conference Address
> > CA
> > USA
> > Additional Information:
> > Last Name Roberson
> > First Name Chip
> > Version 2.1
>
> For what it is worth, I have a Dell XPS R450 running Redhat 5.2 with a 3c509B
> and 3c905B-TX Before setting up the
> cards, I upgraded to the 2.0.36 kernel which has improved support for the
> 3c905B-TX. I turned off PNP for the 3c509B, using the 3Com utility that is
> included with the driver disks.
>
> You should be able to setup the cards in /etc/conf.modules as follows:
>
> alias eth0 3c59x
> alias eth1 3c509
>
> This configuration assumes you are using the default irq and memory. I am
> not sure whether autodetection might affect the order by which the kernel
> recognizes and configures eth0 and eth1 -- but that this setup works, loading
> the 3c905B-TX first on eth0. Also, note that a different driver is specified
> for each card -- the 3c509B uses the 3c509 driver and the 3c905B-TX uses the
> 3c59x driver. My actual setup is a little different because I have
> configured the 3c509B to use irq 5. Of course, you also need to configure
> the IP address, routing, DNS, etc. for each interface using Redhat Control
> Panel or by editing configuration files directly.
>
> Also, see this HOWTO for detailed help:
> http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/misc/multicard.html
------------------------------
From: "Todd Osborne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: What is net-pf-4 and net-pf-5? DHCP?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 07:52:16 GMT
I am having a problem with a kernel I just compiled. Not sure what I changed
to make this happen, but...
I not get insmod errors about not being able to find net-pf-4 and net-pf-5.
At the same time, one of my 2 3COM cards, the one that gets its IP address
from DHCP can't anymore. These are likely related I assume, but am lost on
how to fix it. I have networking stuff compiled into the kernel, not
loadable modules. The only loadable modules that I am using are for floppy
disk, parallel port, and DOS file systems. Any help is greatly appreciated.
Todd
------------------------------
From: "Lee Howes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PPP and chat script problem
Date: 10 Apr 1999 09:46:33 GMT
Please E-mail replies to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not reply to this message.
This is my log of the communication with virgin net for my ppp connection.
This clearly does not work, do you have any idea what addition could make
this work. (NOTE: password and username converted to dashes)
Apr 10 09:41:53 localhost pppd[668]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Apr 10 09:41:54 localhost chat[669]: send (ATDT0645505400^M)
Apr 10 09:41:54 localhost chat[669]: expect (505400)
Apr 10 09:42:13 localhost chat[669]: ATDT0645505400
Apr 10 09:42:13 localhost chat[669]: -- got it
Apr 10 09:42:13 localhost chat[669]: send (^M)
Apr 10 09:42:13 localhost chat[669]: expect (ogin:)
Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: ^M^M
Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: login:
Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: -- got it
Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: send (--user--^M)
Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: expect (assword:)
Apr 10 09:42:33 localhost chat[669]: ^M
Apr 10 09:42:53 localhost chat[669]: login: --user--^M
Apr 10 09:43:03 localhost chat[669]: Password:
Apr 10 09:43:03 localhost chat[669]: -- got it
Apr 10 09:43:03 localhost chat[669]: send (--password--^M)
Apr 10 09:43:03 localhost pppd[668]: Serial connection established.
Apr 10 09:43:13 localhost pppd[668]: Using interface ppp0
Apr 10 09:43:13 localhost pppd[668]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS2
Apr 10 09:43:13 localhost pppd[668]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <magic
0x9a42a177> <pcomp> <accomp>]
Apr 10 09:43:40 localhost last message repeated 9 times
Apr 10 09:43:43 localhost pppd[668]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Apr 10 09:43:43 localhost pppd[668]: Connection terminated.
Apr 10 09:43:43 localhost pppd[668]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit
clean:
Apr 10 09:43:43 localhost pppd[668]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
Apr 10 09:44:03 localhost pppd[668]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Apr 10 09:44:03 localhost pppd[668]: ioctl(TIOCSETD, N_TTY): Interrupted
system call
Apr 10 09:44:04 localhost pppd[668]: Exit.
Thank you, Lee Howes
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Hensema)
Subject: Re: How to send HTML Mail
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 19:57:31 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
James Roman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>What is required to send a HTML message type e-mail message?
>
>I am interested in investigating use of HTML formatted mail messages for
>a project that I am working on. The project is being developed on a
>linux server, but will most likely be implemented on a Sun or HP
>system. I would like to be able to mail HTML forms. The clients are
>using Outlook clients, which can read HTML formatted messages. Any
>explanations about what type of mail servers need to be used, etc.,
>would be greatly appreciated.
You don't need special mailservers, it's all handled by the clients.
--
Erik Hensema ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: Robbert Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH5.2 is driving me nuts!
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 13:20:15 +0200
>
> If your X-Window system is already running:
>
> - Install the linuxconf-1.12r5-6rh.i386.rpm package.
> - Configure your network stuff via linuxconf.
>
> If X-Window is not installed, then you might try to start the Redhat
> installation program (choosing upgrade instead of install) and configure
linuxconf is textbase so it will work without X
> > but you can't re-compile because RH5.2 doesn't come with the
> > source installed
>
> kernel-source-2.0.36-0.7.i386.rpm and kernel-headers-2.0.36-0.7.i386.rpm
> packages from RH5.2.
>
or download your own 2.2.5 sources from an ftp.<country code>.kernel.org
mirror.
--
Robbert Muller
mjrider@writeme dot com | Never let a luser on your console.
uin: 9659330 | Because that means they're in your room.
------------------------------
From: "William R. Mattil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help: tunneling http through home firewall to internal server
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 18:21:31 -0500
"J. Mark Shacklette" wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I'd like to set up a linux firewall (ipfwadm) and have an http server
> running on a box hidden behind the firewall (no public ip address). I'd
> like to be able to set things up so that from the internet, I could
> connect to the firewall (which has a public ip) and have it "foward"
> http packets to the real http server, and have that server pass results
> back through the firewall to my netscape client on the internet. I've
> been told I want to use something like http tunneling, and that I can
> somehow direct a particular port on the firewall to direct http requests
> to the real internal http server.
>
> The only problem is that I have no earthly idea how to do this, or where
> to start. Any and all suggestions, pointers to howtos and docs, etc.
> would be most welcome and appreciated.
>
> I would also like to have ftp redirected as well. I guess another way
> to put it is I'd like to be able to run an ftpd and httpd from a server
> behind the firewall, but allow selected access to it from the internet.
>
> Any help would be most appreciated.
>
>
I use squid to proxy http through the firewall.
Bill
--
William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ginger had to do it all backwards
(972) 399-4106 | and... in high heels.
------------------------------
From: Erik-Jan Sinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PLIP and kernel 2.2.4
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 12:04:03 +0200
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
==============DB234A18C764B570EDE90B46
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi there,
I�m having trouble setting up a parallel link between my normal PC and
my laptop. Both machines are running RedHat 5.2 and kernel 2.2.4. I�ve
compiled PLIP, Parport and Parport_pc as modules and configured the
plip0 interface through linuxconf. However, when I try to load the
"plip.o" module it comes back with " Device or resource busy". I�ve also
made sure that my parallel port is on the right IO (0x378) and Irq (7).
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanx in advance,
Erik
==============DB234A18C764B570EDE90B46
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="Zijlware111.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Erik-Jan Sinke
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="Zijlware111.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Sinke;Erik-Jan
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
org:Zijlware Inc.;C.E.O. IT-Solutions
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Ing.
x-mozilla-cpt:;0
fn:Erik-Jan Sinke
end:vcard
==============DB234A18C764B570EDE90B46==
------------------------------
From: Richard Torkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba works, now I want to go the other way
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 10:54:57 +0200
Eugene wrote:
>
> smbmount
> (see the manual page / documentation for more info)
>
> --
> "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
> "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft's slogan
>
> mike dombrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Thanks to Ying Zhang's wonderful howto I got samba working and my win
> > machines can map my linux box's hard disk. Now how do I have my linux
> > box use my windows boxes hard disks/printers? For instance I want to
> > make the HP 855c attached to a windows machine my default printer on
> > my linux box?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Mike
Well when it comes to HD volumes and NOT printers this program might
help you a lot.
http://www.bnro.de/~schmidjo/
But remember that if you use one of the latest samba (2.0.*) then you
have to make your own binaries which include smbmount/smbumount/smbmnt
to make Linneighborhood to work.
This can be done easily reading the documentation that comes with the
tar.gz package. It's a simple script which you have to alter a bit so
that it creates a rpm for you with these tools included.
Richard
--
I _like_ using goto's every once in a while:
it can often mess up the gcc optimizer just enough
to get better code out of it.
(Linus Torvalds)
------------------------------
From: "Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: What is net-pf-4 and net-pf-5? DHCP?
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 06:23:40 -0400
Todd Osborne wrote in message ...
>I am having a problem with a kernel I just compiled. Not sure what I
changed
>to make this happen, but...
>
>I not get insmod errors about not being able to find net-pf-4 and net-pf-5.
You can turn off the requests for these modules in the /etc/conf.modules
file. the net-pf-5 I "think" is apple talk.
add this line in that file.
# /etc/conf.modules
alias net-pf-4 off
alias net-pf-5 off
Not sure how your machine is configured but this will get these out of the
way to debug your ethernet problem.
Are you seeing error msgs on boot up for your cards i.e. /var/log/dmsg
or /var/log/messages
the conf.modules can kick start your cards.
# example conf.modules
alias eth0 ne
options ne io=0x300 # 0x <your setting>
>
>Todd
>
>
Greg
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (razoon)
Subject: Re: Telnet/ftp to linux server: login incorrect
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 11:39:48 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>I'm assuming you're trying to get in from the 98 machines... Your
>hosts.allow is your problem. It isn't allowing access from anywhere but
>that particular machine. It should be something like:
>
>ALL: LOCAL
>ALL: .yourdomainname.com # or .org, or whatever
>
>You can also put in a raw IP address in there, or a single host if you
>like. The manpage hosts_access(5) will tell you all you need to know.
I have tried all this but still no result....mmmmmm
why cant i login from a client with username and password i made in X
on the server?
------------------------------
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NT Server - Linux Internet Wiorksation
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 06:50:36 -0500
You need versions of the clients that support utilizing your proxy server.
Similar to 'sockified' versions for a socks proxy server. I know versions
exists for socks. I don't know of any for other proxy servers. I can't
imagine
they are much different. You might try taking a look at the socks versions
and see if they can be made to work. www.socks.nec.com
Rick Johnson wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Greetings.
>
>I have an NT 4 server with a cable modem, running WinGate 3. The
>NT server successfully servers Internet to the rest of my network,
>consisting of 2 Windows 98 clients and a Macintosh client. I can
>successfully configure Netscape on the Linux station to work through the
>proxy server but I am having very limited success configuring the
>general TCP/IP networking on the Linux station. When I ping, the name
>is resolved to an IP address, but that is it - I do not get ping times.
>I can not send mail with PINE nor can I FTP or TELNET. I am running Red
>Hat 5.2.
>
>I appreeciate any assistance that anyone has to offer.
>
>
> - Rick
>
------------------------------
From: Chris MacKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Noticing a pattern: Red Hat + ethernet + 3c509 family = net
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 00:30:38 +0000
Nonya Bidness wrote:
> the net. I have the 3c509 card family and can't reach the nameservers.
> unreachable???
> what is the deal? I am headed to check Red Hat's page for any help...just
> wanted to point this out if anyone is noticing PLEASE help us out...we are
> becoming a mass epidemic.
I have a 3c590B-TX (Cyclone) and mine works just fine (see log below).
I'm using RedHat v5.2 with kernel v2.2.5-ac1 on a GA-6BXDS (Dual PII350)
3c59x.c:v0.99H 11/17/98 Donald Becker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/
vortex.html
eth0: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0xe400, 00:10:5a:6d:bc:f9, IRQ
18
8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/Autonegotiate interface.
MII transceiver found at address 24, status 786d.
MII transceiver found at address 0, status 786d.
Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
--
Rgds,
Chris MacKenzie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 95/NT - 32 bit extensions and a graphical shell
for a 16 bit patch to an 8 bit operating
system originally coded for a 4 bit
microprocessor, written by a 2 bit company
that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (George Dau)
Subject: Re: Accessing Linux server remotely
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 08:47:27 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dereks2nd) wrote:
]I now have a working network, Using windows 98 workstations to a REDHAT Linux
]server. I now wish to dial into the linux server from a remote location.
]
]Q ) What do I use on Linux server to enable dial in ?
]Q ) Can I use Dial up networking on the Win98 workstation thats trying to
]dial in ?
Yes, works very well. You run pppd (the PPP daemon) on the serial port instead
of a having a getty on the port. Is explained in the HOWTO documents available
from http://www.linux.org under support. If you want examples, mail me.
--
,-,_|\ George Dau - Unix (Solaris, DEC Unix, Linux), Oracle, Internet. __
/ * \ Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! Views/opinions above need (00)
\_,--\_/ Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! not be those of MIM or the ( \/ )
v WWW: http://www.pobox.com/~gedau ! Carpentaria Buffalo Club. W--W
------------------------------
From: InocuLAN
Subject: InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 04:16:22 -0700
The (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus was detected in (Public
Folders\Happy99.exe) and was sent by (Predrag Timotic). Action: (File
was not Cured, Renaming.).
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
