Linux-Networking Digest #912, Volume #10 Mon, 19 Apr 99 02:14:04 EDT
Contents:
Re: ppp problem (fairly simple question i think) (John Hickmott)
Re: IP masquerading firewall - ftp problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Ip Masq problem (Phil DeBecker)
Linux as Mailserver, Newbie Questions ("Ole")
QMail and ethernet. why doesn't Linux like me? ("Captain B")
Re: setting up DHCP for cablemodem (Stephen Carville)
Re: Fooling my ISP (Stephen Carville)
Re: Serial Port to TCP Port application (Glenn Butcher)
Re: Email with Earthlink, Sendmail, exmh, mh, Linux libc5 (Andrew Gideon)
Re: Beowulf clusters (Jason Abate)
Re: linux version (Charles Pouliot)
test (Stephen Carville)
Re: QMail and ethernet. why doesn't Linux like me? (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Ruberg)
Re: mgetty + pppd (Bill Unruh)
Packets on the floor, part II ("D. C. & M. V. Sessions")
ppp-2.3.6 won't compile, looking for help. (Macro)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: John Hickmott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ppp problem (fairly simple question i think)
Date: 18 Apr 1999 21:11:29 PDT
I used linuxconf to up my ppp config, and it worked just fine. For
everyday use it is somewhat cumbersome. I mostly use usernet to bring
network up and down. I suspect they both use the ifup and ifdown
commands to do the actual work. You can just enter ifup ppp0 at the
command line(or ifdown ppp0). The relevant scripts are in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/, and control the existence of
/var/run/ppp-$DEVICE.dev. I would check to see that this file exists
when connected and does not after you close the connection. I wonder if
the script saw that file when trying to start a connection it might
assume a connection already was made? I think understanding these
scripts is critical to your problem!
Well, this may not be much help but I wish you luck anyhow...
John Hickmott
Mogul 55 wrote:
> ok i just used linuxconf to set up my ppp connection. However it will
> only
> activate when i boot. in linuxconf there is a connect button but i
> click it
> and nothing happens also it does not disconnect correctly from the
> same place.
> when it loads at boot time the connection is fine and i am able to
> browse the
> net with out a problem.
>
> Can someone please help
> Thanks in advance
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.os2.networking.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: IP masquerading firewall - ftp problem
Date: 19 Apr 1999 04:12:16 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wonkoo Kim)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner) writes:
>Here in comp.os.os2.networking.tcp-ip, [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake unto us, saying:
>
>>I can download files in Web browser, but why do ftp sessions have
>>problem? I tried simple ifpwadm rules:
>>
>>ipfwadm -F -p deny
>>ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.1/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>>ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.2/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>>ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.0.3/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>>
>>What did I miss?
>
>The default Linux IP Masq setup only supports "passive" FTP sessions by
>default, and you must load a special module in order to allow active
>FTP sessions (or else you can configure your various FTP client(s) to
>use passive FTP instead -- NFTP supports this, for example).
>
>The example configuration I posted earlier shows how to do it; just add
>something like this:
>
> /sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp.o
>
>in your /etc/rc.d/rc.local or whatever.
A line before my ipfwadm rules was
modprobe -a ip_masq_* # add all modules
Isn't this enough to load ip_masq_ftp.o module?
Thanks.
//--------------------------------------------------------------------
// Wonkoo Kim ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 23:00:02 -0400
From: Phil DeBecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ip Masq problem
Andrea Chiesa wrote:
>
> I have two questions:
> For my home:
> I have a RedHat 5.2 installed. I have compiled my kernel with all
> support for Ip masq, forwarding, firewalling ... (I haven't understand
> what they all are) and I have tried to go to Internet from my NT4 behind
>
> my Linux Box.
> Of course I can't get out!! I can ping my Linux eth0 and also my ppp0
> but can't ping anything outside.
Sounds like you're most of the way there. Two other steps:
on the linux box, you need to run the ipfwadm commands
ipfwadm -F -f
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0/0
where 192.168.1.0 is your private network address.
You also need to configure the NT box to use the linux box as its
gateway and nameserver.
> I'm interested in using Ip masq and have heard of the Ipchains program.
> Is that better than Ipfwadm?
Somewhat, but ipchains is only for the 2.2.x kernels while ipfwadm is
for the 2.0.x kernels.
>
> For my job:
> There is a way to permit or deny not only a workstation but olsa a user
> to go through the firewall?
> I have more than one private net with a Linux box as gateway to the
> router.
> I need a system that will let me grant access to the router from my
> internal networks deciding on ip# and user of machine. All internal nets
>
> are Win Nt or 98.
Well, you could put ipfwadm lines like
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.5/32 -D 0/0
for every workstation you want to let out. At the level where IP Masq
operates, there isn't any way to control access on a per-user basis,
only on a per-IP-address basis.
Phil D.
------------------------------
From: "Ole" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux as Mailserver, Newbie Questions
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 22:57:48 +0200
Hi,
I'm running a little LAN with NT Servers, our own DNS and Mailserver. MS
Exchange and it's Internet Mail Service unfortunately is very unstable so we
decided to try to move the Mailserver to a Linux machine. (... and sacrifice
the really nice Outlook Web Access application which provides Mail access
through our web server).
I'm happily surprised how smoothly Redhat 5.2 distribution brought us
through installation - within a couple of hours the pc was up and running
and connected to the internet.
I understand that I would have to configure sendmail now. We have several
domain names (.com .edu .ch .org) and mailuser with several email-addresses
(like one with the real name and another which indicates his role). These
different email addresses have to end up in the appropriate mailboxes -
Where can I find good and short information (with examples) on how to do
this? (I can handle our DNS, it's only Linux which is completely new to me
:o
Thanks for any hints,
Ole
Institute for Higher Tibetan Studies, Switzerland
ole[nospam]@email.com
------------------------------
From: "Captain B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: QMail and ethernet. why doesn't Linux like me?
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 14:13:11 +1000
To anyone who is nice enough to help a guy out. :-)
I've set up a Linux machine at my workplace with the intention of using it
as both a fileserver and an internet gateway/mail server. I have the link to
the net active and DNS is working, however I cannot ping any other machine
on the network and no other machine can ping the Linux box. The ethernet
card shows the link as active and the Tx/Rx lights flicker as one would
expect. The kernel finds the card correctly (it's a SMC WD8013) and doesn't
report any errors. Any suggestions?
Also, I have tried to set up QMail as the SMTP agent for the network as well
as the POP3 server. I have followed the instructions in the INSTALL.* files
and inserted the correct lines in inetd.conf but when I attempt to send a
message from that machine to any email address, it reports no errors but
nothing gets delivered either. POP I can't get to work at all.
Can anyone point me in the direction of some docs or some basic advice? I've
got a lot of experience with networking, configuring stuff and computers in
general and I have been using Linux for a while but this is my first time
for setting up a server installation. Thanks heaps. :-)
If anyone does reply to me, could they please do it via E-Mail? My E-Mail
address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] . No need to remove anything (I like spam.
:-) )
Chris Ricks
Once again, to anyone who even reads this, thanks!
------------------------------
From: Stephen Carville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: setting up DHCP for cablemodem
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:25:10 -0700
Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> : It is also possible you have fallen afoul of a known bug in dhcpcd-0.70.
> : Check your logs to see if you are receiving the DHCPOFFER message and are
> : sending a DHCPREQUEST. If you are but never receiving the DHCPACK then you
> : are probably a victim of the bug.
>
> Hm, I tried this one (actually this was my first shot at dhcp stuff :-)
> and I got "No DHCPOFFER". After backing out to dhcpcd-0.65 things
> started to work immediately. Is this the same bug you talk about?
Not as far as I know. I discovered the problem when my 5.2 laptop
consistently failed to get an address from any subnet other than the one
the server was on. I used a sniffer trace to isolate the problem.
The bug seems to be very specific and only affects the DHCPREQUEST packet.
If you are getting no DHCPOFFER then, for some reason, your server is not
seeing or not responding to the DHCPDISCOVER. AFAIK, this is not related
to the bug I discovered.
--
Stephen Carville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====================================================
It's all right to have geniuses build systems for use by idiots, but
the path from laboratory to marketplace needs to go through the
proving ground of prudent engineering.
Peter Coffee
------------------------------
From: Stephen Carville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Fooling my ISP
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 14:24:19 -0700
K.A. Steensma wrote:
>
> I have tried to fool my ISP into thinking that I am 'using' my
> connection. I set up a cron job to ping my ISP's nameserver. But they
> can detect this and shut me down for inactivity. Then I tried to ping a
> site away from my IPS. This doesn't work either.
>
> Would anyone have an idea how to keep my ISP from shutting me down?
First, I agree with those who tell you to get DSL or Cable Modem. In the
long run you will be much happier anyway.
However, if you want to "fool" an ISP, try writing a small perl script that
opens a socket on port 80 to a randomly selected host. Call this from a
cron job often enough to keep the connection up.
--
Stephen Carville
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
====================================================
It's all right to have geniuses build systems for use by idiots, but
the path from laboratory to marketplace needs to go through the
proving ground of prudent engineering.
Peter Coffee
------------------------------
From: Glenn Butcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Serial Port to TCP Port application
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 11:28:45 -0600
You might try writing a wrapper script in Perl. The TCP server examples
in the Camel book are easy to follow; it'd get you up and running quick
and give you a prototyping environment to nail down the TCP interface.
Glenn Butcher
David Peavey wrote:
>
> I have an application that uses a device connected to my serial port.
> However, I need to "remote" this application. I would like to connect my
> serial port to a TCP Port in my Linux machine. This would allow me to
> remotely control my serial port "widget" through TCP/IP. Is there an easy
> way to do this? Has anyone done this before? Sample C source code?
> Implications for the other (remote) end?
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Gideon)
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.mail.mh,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Email with Earthlink, Sendmail, exmh, mh, Linux libc5
Date: 18 Apr 1999 22:00:45 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jim Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>If I had to guess, I'd guess that these providers got tired of receiving
>spam from Earthlink and have denied access to the entire domain because
>Earthlink refuses to deal with spam appropriately.
>
>Just a guess...
>
It might be a variation of this, too.
For example, many places use either a public or private list of
IP addresses that are dialups. SMTP connections from these addresses
are disallowed. As was pointed out, this is a way that the problem
of junk email is being attacked.
Then, there are other possibilities.
The best best is to ask GULF.NET why specifically these messages
are being rejected. We get requests like this every so often
(although we try to keep this down with SMTP errors messages that
are more informative than "access denied"). GULF.NET is the proper
place to address your question because it is (judging from
your message) pompano.pcola.gulf.net that is rejecting the SMTP
traffic.
Most likely, they'll be happy to explain why (although you should
be ready for a suggestion that you change ISPs). If it does turn
out to be that GULF.NET rejects connections from dialups, then the
solution is to (as others have pointed out) pass all your SMTP
traffic via Earthlink's servers. This actually has other advantages
for you as well, so it's a good idea regardless of the problem
with GULF.NET.
- Andrew
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jason Abate)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Beowulf clusters
Date: 18 Apr 1999 21:06:42 GMT
On Sat, 17 Apr 1999 14:35:31 -0700, Bob Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Anybody have any experience setting up and maintaining a Beowulf
>cluster? I'm attempting one at my school as a project, and I'd like to
>have any advice or input that you can give. I currently have 10 486DX2
>25MHz machines to use in the cluster; any advice on how I should
>properly set them up and all? (I have a slightly working configuration
>right now, but I want to incorporate the best ideas and use the best
>software and drivers that I can.) Thanks in advance for any advice/help!
I've setup/maintain several beowulf clusters. If you're hoping to
have a system to experiment with parallel computing, the hardware
that you've got should be fine. If you're hoping to to amass a lot
of computing power, you'd do better with a single modern machine.
That said, you'll find lots of helpful information at www.beowulf.org
and www.beowulf-underground.org. In particular, the mailing list
archives on beowulf.org should be quite useful. If you have specific
questions, post them or send them my way, and I'll try to help.
-jason
--
====================================================================
Jason Abate [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.ticam.utexas.edu/~abate
Texas Institute for Computational and Applied Mathematics
304 SHC, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712
Work: 512-471-6947 Home: 512-912-1012 Fax: 512-471-8694
------------------------------
From: Charles Pouliot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: linux version
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 04:55:41 GMT
The only version of Linux which clearly installs on less than 6 MB RAM is
Debian linux, available at www.debian.org and mirror sites. Debian is
specifically designed to install on less than 6 MB, definitely as low as 4 MB
( I did it on a 386SX-16 MHz! ), and possibly as little as 3 MB, but I'm not
sure; it even runs in single-user mode with only 4 MB RAM and no swap (
although you ought to have at least a little anyway ). There are also some
tiny linuxes that may run, but they may not suit your needs. Debian is a
mainstream linux distribution. When I was looking for info on what linux I
could run on 4 MB RAM, the only info I came across for RedHat was that a 4 MB
install had been engineered to _work_ if done off a NFS server, but was
otherwise impossible. I didn't get definite indication about Slackware,
whether it would or wouldn't install on 4 MB RAM.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Doug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is only one solution SLACKWARE!!!
> well, actually there are many, but i know that i ran slackware 3.6 with
> 2.0.36 on my 386DX 33 with 8 meg of ram. It worked great (don't bother with
> xwin though ;). I'll be installing it on another 386 soon with 2 meg of
> ram, it'll be cool if it works ;)
>
> calvyn du toit wrote in message <7f058a$c4r$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >im looking for a version of windows that will run on a 486 with 4mb or ram,
> >ive tried redhat 5.2 & debian but they hanging during the installation,
> any
> >ideas
> >
> >
>
>
--
Charles Pouliot
Computing & Information Science Major
Saint Vincent College
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Stephen Carville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: test
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:12:39 -0700
------------------------------
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F8rn?= Ruberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: QMail and ethernet. why doesn't Linux like me?
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 07:22:12 +0200
Captain B wrote:
[snip]
> Also, I have tried to set up QMail as the SMTP agent for the network as well
> as the POP3 server. I have followed the instructions in the INSTALL.* files
> and inserted the correct lines in inetd.conf but when I attempt to send a
> message from that machine to any email address, it reports no errors but
> nothing gets delivered either. POP I can't get to work at all.
My guess is that you haven't changed the mailbox locations yet... The
mail is probably delivered, but you haven't told you server where to
look for them.
--
Bj�rn Ruberg / http://traktor.nlh.no/beorn
Remove the .no_spam for my email address
"The more you scream the less you hear" * f i s h *
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Subject: Re: mgetty + pppd
Date: 19 Apr 1999 05:25:56 GMT
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David
H. Brown) writes:
]I'm trying to get my primary system to allow dial-up connections
](plus fax, etc.) using mgetty. I've encountered 3 problems:
]1) I got the impression that even though mgetty was running, I
]could still use the modem for some other process (i.e., to
]dial out to my ISP). That doesn't seem to be the case. If
]mgetty is running, the pppd just sits there waiting. (I didn't
]see any lock files in /var/lock.)
You can. But you must use the lock option for pppd.
Note, you must also make sure that you use the same port for both. Ie,
not /dev/modem for one and /dev/cua2 for the other. That will NOT work.
Use /dev/ttyS? (?= your port number) for both.
]2) On another machine, I can dial in and mgetty will answer the
]line, and do login (based on the user id and password in my
]chat script on the dial-in machine). In fact, a shell is
]even started (?!). But no ppp configuration takes place.
That is because you did not tell ppp to run. You must start ppp on the
server. The user can do it by running pppd as a command or from a
script, or you can use PAP or CHAP authentication and use AutoPPP (see
the mgetty docs)
]How is this supposed to happen. I tried to assign a static IP
]to the dialin machine on the pppd command line
]"192.168.0.131:192.168.0.5" where 131 is for the dialin machine
]and 5 is for the hosting machine. I couldn't find any examples
]of the syntax, so I just kinda chucked it in as an argument to
]pppd.
]3. I tried to do a "shell login" with minicom, but after giving
]a user id and password to the login/password prompts, nothing
]happens, and the line disconnects.
?? Not enough ifo here as to which machines you are doing what on.
u just told us above that a shell login worked fine. So what do you
mean?
------------------------------
From: "D. C. & M. V. Sessions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Packets on the floor, part II
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 22:33:08 -0700
Peeling the onion, layer III
IP masquerade, pretty simple rules. 100Mb/s local network,
2.0.36 on both machines (Pentium 266 and 233 w. 64MB)
56Kb modem.
After dinking around with Primenet's security issues we
THINK we have that under control (hint: midentd needs to
respond with the ISP account login.)
Trouble is, we're still hanging up on longer transfers.
Somewhere around 60K or so and everything just quits.
If we start the transfer from the firewall box everything
goes just fine, thanks.
Suggestions on where to look for the packet leakage?
--
He either fears his fate too much, or his deserts are small,
That puts it not unto the touch to win or lose it all.
D. C. & M. V. Sessions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Macro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp-2.3.6 won't compile, looking for help.
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:30:19 GMT
Hi !
I have a problem while compiling the ppp-2.3.6 on my Linux 2.2.5 machine.
I followed the readme.linux and have done "make kernel", what I have not done
is rebuilding my current kernel, but i think my problem has nothing to do
with it.
I am getting following error message when making pppd:
gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE -I../include
-DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1 -DHAS_SHADOW -o pppd main.o magic.o fsm.o lcp.o
ipcp.o upap.o chap.o md5.o ccp.o auth.o options.o demand.o sys-linux.o
ipxcp.o md4.o chap_ms.o main.o: In function `main':
/home/superruss/ppp-2.3.6/pppd/main.c:405: undefinetd reference to
`__sigsetjmp' /home/superruss/ppp-2.3.6/pppd/main.c:559: undefined reference
to `__sigsetjmp' /home/superruss/ppp-2.3.6/pppd/main.c:629: undefined
reference to `__sigsetjmp' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: ***
[pppd] Error 1
Now I know the __sigsetjmp is defined in setjmp.h include file, and it is
there, alive and kicking in my include dir.
What could that be ? Please advise, I am not a C programmer and lost here.
I still think those are damn includes, unfortunately ... I have huge problems
with them since long time, my system is old suse distribution based on kernel
2.0.36, I had to update everything in my /usr/include/ dir manualy but still
get such problems as above very often. Can anyone give me a hint how to
update my include dir on the newest, standard stand ? I have found what many
linux kernel includes do not work with different software, while the
same-named but a bit different includes from glibc2 source work well.
Of course I could buy a new SUSE and reinstall my OS but I want to fight
myself trough the problems and fix it by hand.
Thanks, Macro
Full session log of make in pppd dir follows:
titicaca:/home/superruss/ppp-2.3.6/pppd # make gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g
-D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE -I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1
-DHAS_SHADOW -c main.c -o main.o main.c:21: warning: `rcsid' defined but not
used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE
-I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1 -DHAS_SHADOW -c magic.c -o magic.o
magic.c:21: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g
-D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE -I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1
-DHAS_SHADOW -c fsm.c -o fsm.o fsm.c:21: warning: `rcsid' defined but not
used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE
-I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1 -DHAS_SHADOW -c lcp.c -o lcp.o
lcp.c:21: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g
-D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE -I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1
-DHAS_SHADOW -c ipcp.c -o ipcp.o ipcp.c:21: warning: `rcsid' defined but not
used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE
-I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1 -DHAS_SHADOW -c upap.c -o upap.o
upap.c:21: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g
-D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE -I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1
-DHAS_SHADOW -c chap.c -o chap.o chap.c:37: warning: `rcsid' defined but not
used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE
-I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1 -DHAS_SHADOW -c md5.c -o md5.o gcc -O2
-pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE -I../include
-DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1 -DHAS_SHADOW -c ccp.c -o ccp.o ccp.c:29: warning:
`rcsid' defined but not used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1
-DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE -I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1
-DHAS_SHADOW -c auth.c -o auth.o auth.c:36: warning: `rcsid' defined but not
used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE
-I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1 -DHAS_SHADOW -c options.c -o options.o
options.c:21: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g
-D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE -I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1
-DHAS_SHADOW -c demand.c -o demand.o demand.c:21: warning: `rcsid' defined
but not used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE
-I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1 -DHAS_SHADOW -c sys-linux.c -o
sys-linux.o gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE
-I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1 -DHAS_SHADOW -c ipxcp.c -o ipxcp.o
ipxcp.c:22: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g
-D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE -I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1
-DHAS_SHADOW -c md4.c -o md4.o gcc -O2 -pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1
-DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE -I../include -DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1
-DHAS_SHADOW -c chap_ms.c -o chap_ms.o chap_ms.c: In function `DesEncrypt':
chap_ms.c:128: warning: implicit declaration of function `setkey'
chap_ms.c:136: warning: implicit declaration of function `encrypt' chap_ms.c:
At top level: chap_ms.c:35: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used gcc -O2
-pipe -Wall -g -D_linux_=1 -DHAVE_PATHS_H -DIPX_CHANGE -I../include
-DCHAPMS=1 -DUSE_CRYPT=1 -DHAS_SHADOW -o pppd main.o magic.o fsm.o lcp.o
ipcp.o upap.o chap.o md5.o ccp.o auth.o options.o demand.o sys-linux.o
ipxcp.o md4.o chap_ms.o main.o: In function `main':
/home/superruss/ppp-2.3.6/pppd/main.c:405: undefinetd reference to
`__sigsetjmp' /home/superruss/ppp-2.3.6/pppd/main.c:559: undefined reference
to `__sigsetjmp' /home/superruss/ppp-2.3.6/pppd/main.c:629: undefined
reference to `__sigsetjmp' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: ***
[pppd] Error 1
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
