Linux-Networking Digest #969, Volume #10 Tue, 27 Apr 99 06:13:50 EDT
Contents:
Re: Best 100 Base TX card for linux ("Mike Rayborn")
Re: RH 5.2 Ftp question (Michael Odom)
Re: Ftpd with gui interface (Mike Jackson)
Re: DSL DHCP disables webserver and ip_forwarding (Michael Odom)
Re: direct ethernet + PPP backup ("Mike Rayborn")
Re: Playing BATTLE.NET and Age of Empires behind IP Masquerade (yua cavan)
Red Hat 5.1 won't dial PPP (Brian T.)
Re: Epson Stylus Color II printer and Samba 2.0.3 and NT Workstation 4.0 (SP4) == NO
GO :~< ("Bleh")
Re: RH 5.2 Ftp question (Chuck Landress)
Re: hide-password (Clifford Kite)
Re: Chaining Printers and ZIP Drive (Allen Wong)
Re: PPP & ping (Christopher Mahmood)
Samba Performance HOWTO.... Help me create a ("Steffen KH")
Help! Cannot get data from LDAP server. ("Michael D. Cencula")
Re: Advice: Linux + ADSL - internal or external modem (ANT?) (Bennet K)
Question about a mail program and platform independency ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: FLOPPY (wyatt)
Can't find libgdbm.so.2 or tind ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: How can I split up a network? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Remote Install?? ("Tad")
Routing Samba over LAN (Zach Forsyth)
Re: Two computers, One ISDN modem, & a Home LAN ("Tad")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Mike Rayborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Best 100 Base TX card for linux
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 21:07:27 -0400
I'm using 3COM 3C905-TX and it works great. I tried some other brands
(Linksys and Netgear) but couldn't get these to work.
Mike Rayborn
Smartpatrol wrote in message <7g2n0q$d9n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>There are a few 100Mbit base cards that work under linux at 10Mbit. But
>which ones work at the rated 100Mbit properly any recommendations are
>welcome.
>
>Smartpatrol
>
>
------------------------------
From: Michael Odom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH 5.2 Ftp question
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 00:51:24 +0000
Jim Bailey wrote:
>
> Hi folks. I am trying to get ftp working on my RH 5.2 box (to go to an NT
> machine and vice-versa). From the Linux side I can get to the NT box fine.
> NT to Linux yeilds a 'connection made' message followed seconds later by a
> '421 service not available' message. I've made sure the inetd ftpd line is
> uncommented per my Linux Unleashed book and the only thing my RH book says
> is to install anon-ftp which doen't help. I can by the way, telnet to the
> Linux box and, when I 'open <Linux machine name>' (ftp to self, so to speak)
> , I get the same results. What am I missing ?
>
> -- jim bailey
First check your logfile for any error messages (usually
/var/log/messages and /var/log/secure) if there is any obvious problems
you may find it here.
Also check your hosts.allow and hosts.deny and make sure that the host
you are trying to ftp from (your NT box) is not denied access by inetd.
--
Michael Odom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IS Services
Gyedco Technologies / LogonC@fe
------------------------------
From: Mike Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.jgaa,alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.questions
Subject: Re: Ftpd with gui interface
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 01:15:54 GMT
Try wxftp, you should be able to find a link on freshmeat.net.
Ray wrote:
> Can anyone point me to a ftpd with a GUI? I really want to be able to
> monitor user activity and stats. I am used to using warftpd under NT but
> have moved to Linux..
>
> Thanks
> Ray
--mikej
-=-----
mike jackson
is coordinator @ qualimetrics, inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Michael Odom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.misc,linux.redhat.misc
Subject: Re: DSL DHCP disables webserver and ip_forwarding
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 00:46:27 +0000
Don Heffernan wrote:
>
> I have been running a Redhat 5.2 server for a few weeks with an ISDN
[..snip..]
> At any rate, I can get on the net from the Linux box, but I can't get
> IP_Forwarding working - I can ping both interfaces from the PCs behind
Try this:
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> it but can't get out onto the network. Also, whenever I boot with the
> dhcp setup I can't access the Web server from the linux box or from
> the boxes behind it. I get a message that the server refused the
> connection or may be busy. If I reconfigure my setup to the old
> configuration (fixed IP 10.10.10.1) everything works fine.
Generally it is a bad idea to run a server (web server or anything else
of the sort) on a computer configured with DHCP. If you must make sure
you get your DHCP setup and all of your addresses set before you launch
your Apache server. Use netstat -a and look for anything on port 80 (www
or http) to see if Apache is binding correctly.
It kinda sounds like to me that Apache is having trouble figuring out
which IP address to bind to. This could also be
related to your IP_Forwarding problem. Without knowing more specifics
about your network it's hard to say.
This is a tough one for me... someone with a little more Apache
expertise may have a different answer.
>
> I read the dhcp HOWTO and the IP_Forwarding and the Ethernet but can't
> figure this one out. I have been afraid to try to tackle Apache - I
> am a rank beginner.
>
> Anyone out there have any suggestions? I am trying to switch to a
> static address, but I would like to know what I'm missing here.
A static address on your webserver would be a very good idea.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Don Heffernan
Good Luck
--
Michael Odom
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IS Services
Gyedco Technologies / LogonC@fe
------------------------------
From: "Mike Rayborn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: direct ethernet + PPP backup
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 21:26:07 -0400
I'm no expert so bear with me...I think you need to set up ppp with a
default gateway.
Make your normal default route have a metric of 1. The ppp default route
will have a metric of 0. When ppp is up, traffic will use the ppp
connection, otherwise it will use the ethernet connection.
Make sure you have "defaultroute" in the ppp command:
exec /usr/sbin/pppd /dev/modem 38400 crtscts noipdefault defaultroute
connect \ $DIALER_SCRIPT name ${MYNAME} lock modem debug
Mike Rayborn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7g25eo$m31$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I've searched through the postings, but am still
>a bit in the dark. here's my setup:
>linuxbox (2.0.36) with two nics and modem.
>eth0 has valid ip, w/ direct internet acces.
>eth1 is 192.168.1.1.
>
>our win95 clients have valid ips, 207.197.211.x, and
>private, 192.168.1.x. to make things simple,
>we're keeping the valid ips for VNC's from outside, and
>private addresses for masquerading whenever necesary.
>if our direct access dies, i'm trying to route
>192.168.1.x, via ip masquerading, through a ppp dial-up.
>i've establsihed a ppp connection, but how do i force
>masquerading to use the ppp0 device? recently our isp, verio,
>had probems and we were left for a couple of weeks w/ intermitent
>access. at the very least a ppp link would have allowed our
>staff to check their mail....
>
>any ideas?
>
>TIA,
>Bill
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: yua cavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Playing BATTLE.NET and Age of Empires behind IP Masquerade
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 20:33:27 -0500
I have gotten this to work using ipautofw in the past. I just recently
did a clean install of slackware 3.6 and the default ip-chains works
really nicely for me. If you do need ipautofw... just email me and I
can send you an attached email. But yeah, you
do need to forward udp port 6112 with control ip ports 106,108 ( and for
shits and giggles udp 6112 ). It would look like this.
ipautofw -A -r udp 6112 -c tcp 106
ipautofw -A -r udp 6112 -c tcp 108
ipautofw -A -r udp 6112 -c udp 6112
( using ipautofw for Blizzard games )
If anyone has any better suggestions, please post. :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nick Farley wrote:
> Did you ever fingure it out? I have the same problem but with
> diablo. It seems like there is a solution at:
> http://users.nais.com/~nevo/masq/games.html the only problem is that
> I can't find the ipautofw program on my linux box. I'm running
> Mandrake Linux 5.3 (Red Hat 5.2). I've been trying to figure this out
> for about a month. Please help if you can.
>
> colin
>
>
>
> Robert Hurst wrote:
>
>> I am successfully using IP Masquerading from Win'98 PC through my
>> Linux server... however, I cannot seem to use multi-player games
>> such as Diablo II on Battle.net or Microsoft Age of Empires. I
>> heard of similar problems like this that occur when programs use UDP
>> on a specific TCP port. Question: How would I configure such a
>> policy to allow UDP packets out a specific port #? Is there a way I
>> can "sniff-out" a program's use of a port #? Has anyone done this
>> before with the above-mentioned games? Help!!
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian T.)
Subject: Red Hat 5.1 won't dial PPP
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 01:59:28 GMT
I have RH 5.1 and an external USR Courier v.everything. Upon
activating a PPP interface, two of the LEDs (TR and CS, I believe)
briefly flash and then activity stops. I have tried several init
strings (including ATZ, AT&F, AT&F1 and a few other variants) but the
result is always the same. I have also tried changing from dev/modem
to dev/ttyS0 (the modem is on COM1 in Windows) with the same
disappointing result.
For test purposes I made a SLIP interface and the damned thing dialed
out perfectly with all the inits mentioned above. I can also dial out
using Minicom.
Any suggestions?
---Brian T.
------------------------------
From: "Bleh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Epson Stylus Color II printer and Samba 2.0.3 and NT Workstation 4.0
(SP4) == NO GO :~<
Crossposted-To:
comp.protocols.smb,linux.samba,linux.redhat.misc,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.hardware,alt.linux,alt.os.linux,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc,microsoft.public.windowsnt.misc
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 02:10:34 GMT
> Alternatively, you can setup a "raw" queue on Linux and direct the
> NT's Stylus driver at that.
How do I setup a "raw" queue on Linux? I am running Redhat 6.0, and the
'printtool' dowsn't show "RAW" in the list of available printer drivers.
------------------------------
From: Chuck Landress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: RH 5.2 Ftp question
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 22:17:15 -0400
Red Hat doesn't load the ftp server daemon by default when you install. I had
to re-install Red Hat 5.2 to
install it. The daemon is named wu-ftp.
-Chuck Landress
Jim Bailey wrote:
> Hi folks. I am trying to get ftp working on my RH 5.2 box (to go to an NT
> machine and vice-versa). From the Linux side I can get to the NT box fine.
> NT to Linux yeilds a 'connection made' message followed seconds later by a
> '421 service not available' message. I've made sure the inetd ftpd line is
> uncommented per my Linux Unleashed book and the only thing my RH book says
> is to install anon-ftp which doen't help. I can by the way, telnet to the
> Linux box and, when I 'open <Linux machine name>' (ftp to self, so to speak)
> , I get the same results. What am I missing ?
>
> -- jim bailey
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: hide-password
Date: 26 Apr 1999 21:30:17 -0500
Clifton T. Sharp Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Is it me, or does it look like the PPP 'hide-password' option in 2.3.7 is
: only very slightly started and not really implemented?
Here's a message from Paul Mackerras on the ppp-linux list in response
to a query about this:
---
Oops, sorry, here's a patch to fix the problem, to be applied to
pppd/upap.c.
Paul.
--- upap.c 1999/03/16 22:54:43 1.15
+++ upap.c 1999/04/27 01:59:42
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
*/
static option_t pap_option_list[] = {
{ "hide-password", o_bool, &hide_password,
- "Don't output passwords to log" },
+ "Don't output passwords to log", 1 },
{ "pap-restart", o_int, &upap[0].us_timeouttime,
"Set retransmit timeout for PAP" },
{ "pap-max-authreq", o_int, &upap[0].us_maxtransmits,
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
------------------------------
From: Allen Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.slackware
Subject: Re: Chaining Printers and ZIP Drive
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 19:55:33 -0700
Desmond,
Why don't you use Samba and send the print jobs directly to your
Windows machine?
Allen
--
Linux: If you're not careful, you might actually learn something.
------------------------------
From: Christopher Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP & ping
Date: 26 Apr 1999 03:52:45 -0700
yes, a dns. what does your /etc/resolv.conf look like? it should be
something like:
search mydomain
nameserver x.x.x.x (this is the ip of your isp's first/only dns)
nameserver x.x.x.x (this is the ip of your isp's second dns)
-ckm
------------------------------
From: "Steffen KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba Performance HOWTO.... Help me create a
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 09:41:19 +0200
Hi..... Sorry for posting here also...
I'm trying to compile a list of things to do in order to make your
Linux/Samba server give as much performance as possible....
So, my request to all of you out there...
Please send me whatever info you have on performance, and I'll
try to make a decent howto 'round this subject...
I feel this is an important thing to do, since it's not that difficult
setting up a Samba server instead of an NT, but the performance
issue is a whole other thing...
M$ has a very broad range of courses on how to learn to get top-notch
performance from your NT box, and we don't, and that might scare
some people from migrating to Linux on their fileservers....
Especially after phreaky incidents like this one :
http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-04/lw-04-mindcraft.html?04-21
Anyway... I hope very much that you are interested in helping out on this
project. So, if you could mail me everything you've got on how to tune a
Samba server, preferably with some info on what it does, what it affects,
which HW it is running on, which kernel version, which Samba version,
which clients it affects, and if you've got before/after benchmarks...
All sorts of stuff that refers to Samba performance. It would really help
me a lot.....
Tanx in advance to all who'll participate and help this project on it's
way........
Steffen Hansen
Server & Network administrator, Den Blaa Avis, Denmark....
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Michael D. Cencula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help! Cannot get data from LDAP server.
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 00:15:19 -0400
I am trying to set up OpenLDAP to act as a directory for the MS Outlook
Express and/or Netscape address book. I have slapd configured and running
correctly, but can't get my mail clients to look up the directory entries.
(I can, however, look up values using ldapsearch) I think it may be a
problem with not having the correct attributes defined in my database. Does
anyone have experience with this that can help?
--
Michael D. Cencula
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bennet K)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.questions,redhat.networking.general
Subject: Re: Advice: Linux + ADSL - internal or external modem (ANT?)
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 04:20:04 GMT
I have an ADSL setup which is the first setup you mentioned using an
internal Ethernet card and an external ADSL modem. I can report that
this setup works like a dream. Linux may not recognize the "Combo"
card in you option 2. Go with option #1 and be safe.
Ask US West what brand and model of ethernet card so you can have an
idea before installing it if it will be supported under Linux.
Ben
On Tue, 27 Apr 1999 03:20:19 +0000, Malcolm Ferguson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm thinking of getting an ADSL connection, but I need some advice
>pertaining to Linux and how it works with internal and external ADSL
>connections. My local telephone company (US [Wanky] West) offers two
>options:
>
>Option One:
> * Installed and configured Ethernet card (U S WEST can furnish,
>install and configure if desired).
> * RADSL modem (which you can buy from U S WEST).
>Option Two:
> * A PCI card (which you can buy from U S WEST). With a U S WEST
>supplied PCI RADSL card, a separate Ethernet NIC is not required.
>
>Presumably option one will be trivial because it involves the OS
>interfacing with an ethernet card. But what about option two? Any
>suggestions which might be the best?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Question about a mail program and platform independency
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 06:28:48 GMT
Hi,
I've currently written a program that is able to run on an Apache server. It
is a version of mail (RFC 821) that mimics the standard mail command. It can
handle commands like HELO, VRFY, MAIL, RCPT, and QUIT. What I would like to
do now is have it run on a Linux machine and an RS6000. What should I modify
or add in order to make it run on a Unix or a Linux platform?
Thanks so much,
Carolyn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.s. If you respond to the newsgroup, please also email me directly. Thanks so
much! :)
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: FLOPPY
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 05:29:07 +0000
If I'm not mistaken, DOS disks are called "vfat" under linux, not
"msdos".
Rick wrote:
> mount -t ext2 /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy
>
> if it is linux fs format
> or
> mount -t msdos /dev/fd0 /mnt/floppy
>
> if it is msdos formatted.
>
> *** S.B *** wrote in message <7fs1mn$c46$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> >how can i use my floppy drive under REDHAT 5.2
> >
> >i tried : mount /mnt/floppy
> >
> >(but then i have a ERROR ,unknown FS)
> >
> >
> >
> >
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Can't find libgdbm.so.2 or tind
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 01:48:52 -0400
I've been searching to no avail to find tind or the tin source
to make tind as per the man page.
my version of inn can't find libgdbm.o.2 and I've been unable to
locate
one that new?
Any help Where to find these ??? I'm tring to restart my news server
and I guess libgdbm got trashed somewhere??
remove the nospam to email
--
Come Visit Our Website
http://www.freeyellow.com/members/creative-services
Please Visit Our Sponsers (We get paid per visit)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How can I split up a network?
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 07:46:25 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Marcelo Iturbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Network a.b.c.96
> IP Range a.b.c.97 to a.b.c.126
> bradcast a.b.c.127
> NetMask 255.255.255.224
The netmask is the most important part, and that along with the network
address gives you all the others. Let's write it out in binary notation, and
take a closer look at it:
11111111.11111111.11111111.11100000
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Notice that it is made up of a string of 1's followed by a string of 0's.
*All* netmasks have this feature, and you're not allowed (or even able, if
you want your network to _work_) to make a netmask any other way. Also note
that there are 27 1's in the netmask. It is for this reason that your
network is called a '/27' in (modern) technical literature. Written
properly, your network is identified as 'a.b.c.96/27'.
Your network address is a.b.c.96. Let's write that in binary notation
[fudging a little for the 'a.b.c' part]:
aaaaaaaa.bbbbbbbb.cccccccc.01100000
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Your broadcast address [the "last" IP address that fits inside your netmask],
in binary notation, is:
aaaaaaaa.bbbbbbbb.cccccccc.01111111
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Notice that the part they have in common [and indeed the part all of your IP
addresses have in common] is *exactly* the portion of your netmask that is
all 1's. The network address is the smallest number that fits inside your
netmask, and the broadcast address is the largest [the rest being your client
IP's].
That explained, let's now look at the rest of your question.
> On an FAQ I found the following for a smaller network
>
> Network IP RANGE Broadcast
> a.b.c.98 a.b.c.99 - a.b.c.110 a.b.c.111
> a.b.c.112 a.b.c.113 - a.b.c.126 a.b.c.127
The example is wrong. The first network starts at .96, not .98.
To compute the netmask for each of those networks, take a look at the network
address and the broadcast address for each:
aaaaaaaa.bbbbbbbb.cccccccc.01100010 [network A - WRONG]
aaaaaaaa.bbbbbbbb.cccccccc.01100001 [network A - RIGHT]
aaaaaaaa.bbbbbbbb.cccccccc.01101111 [broadcast A]
and
aaaaaaaa.bbbbbbbb.cccccccc.01110000 [network A]
aaaaaaaa.bbbbbbbb.cccccccc.01111111 [broadcast A]
The netmask for each of these is:
11111111.11111111.11111111.11110000
[or 255.255.255.240]
> Network IP RANGE Broadcast
> a.b.c.96 a.b.c.97 - a.b.c.110 a.b.c.111
> a.b.c.112 a.b.c.113 - a.b.c.126 a.b.c.127
You can also write the above networks as:
a.b.c.96/28
a.b.c.112/28
...which provides just as much information [albeit with a little more
calculation required].
> There! Nice and even! But will this work?
Your intuition served you well in this case. The network address and IP range
you specify are actually the correct ones. Where did you find that FAQ?
> I am having probs and am not sure if this is correct.. if it is the
> problem is elsewhere if it is not.. can some one help me out?
Sure. HTH.
-Bill Clark
Systems Architect
ISP Channel
http://locale.ispchannel.com/
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Tad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Remote Install??
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 22:44:16 -0700
With RedHat, you can do a ftp install. You need to create the boot and supp
disks and have a supported nic in your machine.
Newbie wrote in message <7g2k3q$ip5$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Is it possible to remotely install linux on a new pc (nothing on the hdd at
>all) using a boot disk.
>log onto a server and then install linux.
>Is this possible with any distibutions?
>If so how do I go about doing it??
>
>
------------------------------
From: Zach Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Routing Samba over LAN
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 00:49:12 -0500
Here's a tricky one:
I have a RedHat 5.2 linux box running Samba 2.0.3 and a Windows 98 box.
Both computers are connected to the internet through the hub to a DSL
line plugged into the uplink port of the hub. Everything works fine and
both computers can browse the internet.
However, since both computers have dynamic IP addresses (using DHCP) and
may not even be on the same subnet, there really isn't any way that I
can think of to keep traffic between my computers *LOCAL*. Any FTP,
Samba shares, or web access makes a round trip to my ISP and back to the
other computer. Samba drive sharing takes a real hit over the Internet
but I can live with my FTP and web traffic going through my ISP.
Now drive sharing was possible when both boxes were Win98. I assume
this was because the drive sharing was not being conducted over TCP/IP.
I don't suppose there is a vanilla NetBEUI daemon for linux is there?
Someone mentioned IP Aliasing, but while its possible on the linux box,
there doesn't seem to be a way to do it in Win98.
Basically, is there a way to set up a fake local subnet
(192.168.1.x/255.255.255.0) between a linux machine and a Win98
machine? Or do I have to put two network cards in the linux box and two
linux cards in the Win98 box and set up the subnet there?
Thanks in advance,
Zach Forsyth
------------------------------
From: "Tad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Two computers, One ISDN modem, & a Home LAN
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 22:55:29 -0700
An ISDN router with network address translation ( NAT ) would probably offer
you the least amount of headaches. I have had good success with the Netgear
RT348. Last time I checked, they were under $300 US.
Tad
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
