Linux-Networking Digest #6, Volume #11 Sat, 1 May 99 13:13:28 EDT
Contents:
Driver HP 10/100 Network adapter (Marco Rubeck)
Re: Help lan newbie make W98 <==> Linux (mist)
Re: ipchains help please (mist)
Re: RedHat 5.1 firewall to Internet through cable-modem. 2 subnets on the lan.
(Michael T)
Re: ipchains help please (mist)
Re: Log Linux machine to an NT Domain ("Robert Horlings")
Linux-> UW or HP Networked printing (crossposted) (Tony Scholes)
telnetd: All network ports in use (Rich Unger)
Re: samba and Win98 ("Thomas Matzen")
Re: GUI for Samba ("Martin Heupel")
kicking specific users off (Mark Robinson)
ip forwarding, exchange ("Armin LIENSBERGER")
Re: 10Base2 Connector/Cable Quality (root)
Re: Linux printserver for netware ("ddresden")
Re: IPfwadm log question ("ddresden")
Re: ipfwadm rules, help please! ("ddresden")
Re: Telnet problem, please help ("William R. Mattil")
Re: 3C509B NIC Problem...try this .... (Douglas Cole)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Marco Rubeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Driver HP 10/100 Network adapter
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 16:16:47 +0200
Hello,
has anyone the latest driver for HP 10/100 network adapter ?
Or does anyone know where I can get it?
Thanks in advance
Greetings
Marco
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help lan newbie make W98 <==> Linux
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 16:03:33 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ken Stadden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>Any pointers to Windows-Linux networking faq for newbies would be
>appreciated. Or direct advice.
>
>Here's my situation. I've had a no-brainer LAN at home connecting 2 or 3
>W95/98 systems for years. I recently got Red Hat Linux & XWindows up on one
>box, but don't know how to make Windows talk TCP/IP. After lots of reading
>and some experimenting, I'm asking for help.
That's not too difficult, though if you're after windows-specific advice
you would get more help asking in one of the plethora of windows
groups...
FYI, check in Control Panel / Network. Make sure that somewhere in the
list under "configuration" it mentions "TCP/IP -> Your NIC" which
shows that TCP/IP is active for your interface. (If you only have one
interface it might just say TCP/IP without the card name.) If not,
you'll have to use "add/protocol/Microsoft/TCP/IP" to add in the
protocol. Then select the properties. If you don't want to run bootp
or DHCP on the Linux box then you'll have to specify IP addresses in the
IP address tab. Use a private range such as 192.168.1.* and keep
everything in the lan on the same class c subnet mask (255.255.255.0).
If you want to access the 'net via the Linux box using Masquerading,
then set up the default gateway to the IP of the Linux box.
>
>What's this post about the hosts.sam file in my Windows directory? Shall I
>put my Linux IP and domain info in there?
You can do, but hosts.sam is just a sample. You need to rename the
correct version to justs "hosts". The format is explained in hosts.sam.
You really don't have to bother with it, though.
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipchains help please
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 16:10:46 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Anjan Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>Hello,
>
>I have a system that is Red Hat 5.2, with the kernel newly upgraded to
>2.2.7. I have a small private network with 192.168.*.* addreses, and this
>Linux box that acts as a gateway. It's on dialup and has a static ip
>address.
>
>Prior to the upgrade I was using ipfwadm to masquerade my private
>addresses like this, and it worked pretty well
>
> ipfwadm -F -p deny
> ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.1/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
Have you read the ipchains howto? It's quite good for the comparisons.
>
>
>Now, after the upgrade I attempted to get ipchains running in a very
>simple manner. I thought I'd start off by using Rusty's Three-Line guide
>To Masquerading found at www.rustcorp.com. My problem is that although I
>have the correct version of ipchains - 1.3.8 - even when i cut and
>paste the lines from my web browser, I get syntax errors from ipchains.
>For example
>
>root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> ipchains -P forward -j DENY
>ipchains: -P requires a chain and a policy
That should be
/sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY
without the "-j" and don't forget -
/sbin/ipchains --flush input
/sbin/ipchains --flush output
/sbin/ipchains --flush forward
to remove any old rules.
>Try `ipchains -h' or 'ipchains --help' for more information.
>root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> ipchains -A forward -i ppp0 -j MASQ
>ipchains: No chain by that name
which should be
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s $LOCALNET -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE
Where localnet is the machines I want to masquerade for (IE
192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0) and EXTERNAL_INTERFACE is ppp0.
<snip>
I'd suggest that the tutorial is slightly incorrect...
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael T)
Subject: Re: RedHat 5.1 firewall to Internet through cable-modem. 2 subnets on the lan.
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 11:03:35 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 30 Apr 1999 22:07:10 -0400, "Mike Rayborn"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Try using:
># Set default forwarding policy
>ipfwadm -F -p deny
># Set exceptions to the above forwarding policy
>ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.100.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>
>This assumes your network is 192.168.100, your IP addresses on the NT
>machines seem to be in another network.
They are on the same network as the Linux box. But each on its own
network. 192.168.100.0 and 192.168.101.0.
On the Linux box eth0 is DHCP, eth1 is 192.168.100.1 and eth2 is
192.168.101.1
The 2 NT boxes are 192.168.100.100 and 192.168.101.50, each connecting
to a different NIC on the Linux box.
> You should have all the machines in
>your home network using the same network number. Your NT machines should
>use the IP address of your Linux box (probably that of eth0, use ifconfig to
>check) as the gateway address.
I would have all (both) NT boxes use the same network but I don't have
a hub, but I do have the NICs.
>
>Mike Rayborn
>
Michael
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipchains help please
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 16:15:54 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
d. divine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>But his second line is right on the nose and he receives a "no chains found"
>message:
>
> ipchains -A forward -i ppp0 -j MASQ
>
>This command should work without problems, but the error reports their is no
>"forward" chain.
>
Well, the only difference I've seen between that command there, which
doesn't work, and the one I've just posted, which does, is that the -j
and -i and the wrong way around in the above one.
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: "Robert Horlings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Log Linux machine to an NT Domain
Date: 1 May 1999 15:50:56 GMT
Michael Tefft wrote in message <7gf03n$sr6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have installed Caldera 1.3 on a pc at work. I want to be able to login to
>our NT Domain and access the Internet via our Proxy server. I have read
>about Samba but am unsure if this is the tool I need to allow me to do
this.
>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
Hi,
You have to use Samba, version 2.0 or higher. If you want to use a proxy
server, you will really need another proxy server than the one the comes
with NT4. That one doesn't really work (at our network).
Robo
--
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui tacet, consentire videtur
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 17:29:07 +0200
From: Tony Scholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Linux-> UW or HP Networked printing (crossposted)
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.hp.hpux,comp.unix.unixware.misc
Hi
Has anybody managed get RH 5.X lpr printing to a remote printer on a
HP_UX 10.20 or UnixWare 2.1.2 server?
I can get the job to arrive at the remote server, which then experiences
some problem or other with the files/request passed it by the RH
system..
HP box receives the job (via rlpdaemon) and complains thusly in
/usr/spool/lp/log :-
/usr/lib/lpsched: Unable to open and lock "request/pr15/cfA005earth"
pr15 is the printer on the HP box, and earth is the remote RH 5.2 server
UW box receives the job (via lpsched/lpNet) and complains thusly in
/var/lp/logs/lpsched :-
Fri Apr 23 15:48:24 1999: UX:lpsched: WARNING: Unable to load
secure request file (mercury.beacon.co.uk/3-0).
where 'mercury' is the remote RH 5.1 server...
I'm got a few of these servers to integrate into a variety of
environments and networked printing from the Linux server to in situe
printers is a must.......
Any pointers?
TIA
--
Tony Scholes
Technical Manager
===============================================================================
Beacon Computer Services Tel: +44 (0)1582 478888
The Friars, 82 High Street South Fax: +44 (0)1582 478810
Dunstable, Beds. UK Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LU6 3HD Compuserve: 72660,207
===============================================================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rich Unger)
Subject: telnetd: All network ports in use
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 15:56:51 GMT
Just upgraded from RH 5.1 to 6.0, and now I don't seem to be able to
telnet into my machine. The error message is:
telnetd: All network ports in use.
ftpd, httpd, pop3d all work fine. Has anyone else encountered this?
Thanks.
Rich Unger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Thomas Matzen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba and Win98
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 17:46:31 +0200
hi there,
win98 is now using crypted passwords which are not working with
samba. there have to be made changes in the win98 registry than it
works (dont ask me where).
thomas
Arquimedes Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
eiBW2.3893$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Help...
>
> I recently ungraded my win95 to win98(or loose98) and i can no longer
login
> to samba. The network password dialog box comes up, i enter the password i
> have always used and get a password incorrect.
> The system was working correclty in win95.
>
> any ideas???
>
>
> ARQ.
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Martin Heupel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: GUI for Samba
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 17:49:32 +0200
Philippe,
use swat interface, samba version 2.0.3 with netscape.
regards
Martin
Philippe L� schrieb in Nachricht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hello
>
>Can anyone tell me where I could find an easy to use graphical front
>end to configure SAMBA
>
>Thank you
>
>you can email your answer at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Mark Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kicking specific users off
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 16:11:52 GMT
Is there a way to get rid of specific users (remote users) short of
logging off everyone?
------------------------------
From: "Armin LIENSBERGER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ip forwarding, exchange
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 11:11:09 +0200
i (might) have set up a quite strange configuration
linux (ip 194.152.178.193), acts as firewall and mail gateway to exchange
server, visible to the internet
exchange (ip 194.152.178.194), my mail server behind the firewall (-> NOT
visible to the internet)
workstations (192.168.1.x) -> (NOT visible to the internet)
internet <------> linux <--mail--> exchange
^-- else --> workstations
my linux machine is the mail gateway (relaying to the exchange machine), so
only the linux machine is visible to the rest of the world.
BUT i want to connect to my exchange machine as well, but the firewall
resides on the linux machine.
what's the setup for ipchains (using kernel 2.2.5)?
thanx,
armin
=============================================
armin LIENSBERGER
lsd crossmedia
mariahilferstrasse 110
a-1070 vienna, austria
tel. +43-1-522 2027
fax. +43-1-522 2027
mobile. +43-664-443 1481
email. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (root)
Subject: Re: 10Base2 Connector/Cable Quality
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 12:30:12 GMT
Do you already have a thin coax crimping tool? If not, I doubt making your own
cable will save money. The crimp tool costs more than a premade cable and it's
very difficult to make 10Base2 cables without one. And unless your cards are
self-terminating, you'll need T-connectors and terminators in addition to the
cable. That raises the cabling cost quite a bit.
As far as performance is concerned, that isn't an issue. Reliability is. If
your cabling works reliably, you'll get full performance. 10Mb Ethernet runs
at 10Mb/sec regardless of what the cabling is. The only slowdown is if it has
problems passing packets through the cable reliably. Unreliable coax cabling
can make your life hell. Reliability and ease of diagnostics were major
reasons the industry abandoned coax cabling in favor of 10BaseT.
If you're just connecting two computers, I'd suggest using 10BaseT cards and a
10BaseT crossover cable. No hub needed and the cable is cheaper. 10BaseT
only cards are cheaper as well, unless you've found someone throwing away old
10Base2 cards. And if you find that you need to make the cable yourself, I
think you'll have an easier time of it. The crimp tools are cheaper and there
are also special RJ-45 connectors available that don't require a crimp tool.
You might even be able to make one using regular connectors and no crimp tool.
I did it once when I had a major emergency and no crimp tool available. It
took a while, but I was able to get the connectors on using a small screwdriver
and needlenose pliers. I wouldn't recommend it, though.
/Dave Edick/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 01 May 1999 22:08:28 +1200, Glenn Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all - I realise this isn't the most appropriate newsgroup for this
>question, but anyway....I will soon be setting up a small network at
>home.
>
>The network will be between my Linux box and my brother's windoze box -
>it is intended to allow us to use one modem/dial up connection at the
>same time...I am planning to use IP masquerade for this purpose, and the
>length of the cable will be 25 - 35 metres....
>
>I figure that for a simple network like this, network cards which use
>the BNC style 10Base2 cable will be fine (I'm a cheap student ok!...:)
>Being a student I was just wondering what the difference in speed would
>be between buying pre-made 10Base2 cable, and buying the coax/connectors
>and making the cable myself...
>
>Obviously, making it myself is a lot cheaper, but what will the
>performance be like compared to a professionally made cable...
>
>
------------------------------
From: "ddresden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux printserver for netware
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 11:06:49 -0500
This has always been a part of a seperate product by Novell - their NFS
addon. Go to www.novell.com then the support section and look up "Unix
printing".
David Ruy Oliveira Junior wrote in message
<7gcrs9$n6g$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
>Christophe Zwecker wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need a netware app to be able to print on a linuxserver. How can I
>> make linux be seen for the netware server to print on ? Is there a way
>> ? Which tools would I need ? I'll be glad to RTFM the right stuff.
>>
>> thx alot
>> --
>> Christophe Zwecker
>> Hamburg, Germany
>> mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> fax: +49 40 22715433
>> sms: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (120 chars, subject only)
>
>
>------------------ Posted via SearchLinux ------------------
> http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: "ddresden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPfwadm log question
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 10:53:53 -0500
Most can be found in your /etc/services file. All the 68 errors are bootp
messages and are probably coming for DHCP clients trying to get an ip
address or renew their lease.
David Kennedy wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Sorry for the intrusion, but do you know where I can find more
>information on the logs ipchans/ipfwadm builds?
>
>
>My logs are full of the following:
>
>
>kernel: IP fw-in deny eth0 UDP 192.168.0.1:68 255.255.255.255:67 L=328
>S=0x00 I=64452 F=0x0000 T=128
>
>IP fw-in deny eth0 UDP 10.20.0.3:121 10.20.0.255:121 L=50 S=0x00 I=32
>F=0x0000 T=30
>
>IP fw-in deny eth0 UDP 192.168.0.3:68 255.255.255.255:67 L=328 S=0x00
>I=33360 F=0x0000 T=128
>
>IP fw-in deny eth0 UDP 192.168.0.3:68 255.255.255.255:67 L=328 S=0x00
>I=33616 F=0x0000 T=128
>
>
>
>I am having touble tryting to determine the cause of the problem and
>what this means.
>
>My firewall prevents communication to/from the reserved class A,B, and
>C networks (ie 192.168, .....)
>
>It appears someone on the segment has there system (the rule is fw-in)
>set for 192.168.0.1 trying to use port 68?
>
>
>Thanks.
>
>
>On 30 Apr 1999 06:52:28 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ('John' Joao
>Silva) wrote:
>
>>As a matter of fact that is the default server listening port for
>>Half Life game servers.
>>
>>Apparently someone must think you have a Half Life server running.
>>
>>Hope that helps.
>>
>>--John
>>
>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>Reggie Grubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>I have recently set up a firewall and my log file is absolutely full of
>>>attemts on port :27015 I think this is a port used for online gaming,
>>>but I am not running a game server and have not publicized my ip address
>>>as a place to play. I am getting these hits at least every few minutes
>>>all day long and from all sorts of ip addresses. Anyone have any ideas??
>>>
>>>TIA
>>>
>>
>>
>
------------------------------
From: "ddresden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipfwadm rules, help please!
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 10:33:56 -0500
Your first line denies all traffic. The other filters don't get read. Use a
policy statement first to deny all traffic then open the ports you want.
urgrue wrote in message <7g9gn0$hq0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I think I must be doing something really stupid here, but I am just not
>noticing it.
>
>i have a two linux machines, set up like this:
>
> linux linux
> box #1 box #2
> eth0<-------->eth0 / eth1<-------internet
>(1.0.0.2) (1.0.0.1) (real IP#)
>
>i'm trying to make box #2 into a firewall with masquerading.
>box 2's connections to both box 1 and the internet work fine.
>
>if I do:
>ipfwadm -F -p accept -m
>all works fine. i can telnet to box 1 from box 2, and do all internet
related
>things just fine from box 1. but now everything is going through, which i
dont
>want, so i do:
>
>#denying everything by default
>ipfwadm -F -p deny
>#allowing www to anywhere
>ipfwadm -F -a accept -m -P tcp -S 1.0.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 80
>#allowing dns to anywhere
>ipfwadm -F -a accept -m -P udp -S 1.0.0.0/24 53 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>#etc, other things allowed, not important to list here.
>
>anyway now what two things happen: first, upon trying to telnet to 1.0.0.2
(box
>1) it takes about 1-2 minutes to connect. second, nothing works outwards
(www,
>in this case, and dns). they merely 'hang', without any rejection error or
>anything.
>
>however, this approach seems to work:
>#allow everything by default
>ipfwadm -F -p accept -m
>#now, deny specific services, such as www and dns
>ipfwadm -F -a deny -P tcp -S 1.0.0.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 80
>ipfwadm -F -a deny -P udp -S 1.0.0.0/24 53 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>
>of course i would rather have everything denied by default and then let
certain
>things through only.
>
>anyone have any ideas?
>
------------------------------
From: "William R. Mattil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Telnet problem, please help
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 07:38:44 -0500
Paul wrote:
> When I telnet into my ISP's redhat box, telnet works fine with the
> built in windows telnet program. However when I telnet into my redhat
> box with the same windows telnet program i have all kinds of problems
> with my arrow keys and backspace key. If i misstype a command and use
> the backspace key to delete, all I get is ^H everytime I hit
> backspace. When i'm editing text in vi and use the down arrow to
> scroll the page, I get the letter B and it scrolls up. The other
> arrow keys print other letters. What is going on here, is there a
> config file I need to mess with on my redhat box?
>
> I have tried several different telnet clients and they all do the same
> thing. Using vt100. This problem does not exist when telneting into
> other servers with any of the other clients.
>
> Any suggestions?
Paul,
Compare the environment of the two machines, and probably the first thing
I would check is "echo $TERM" and make sure that its the same on both
systems. Its a pretty well known fact that M$ telent is broken but it
should be consistant between similar systems.
Regards
Bill
--
William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ginger had to do it all backwards
(972) 399-4106 | and... in high heels.
------------------------------
From: Douglas Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: 3C509B NIC Problem...try this ....
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 09:47:54 -0700
the thing that I finally had to do is to disable plug-n-pray on all of NIC's (
3com , SMC and intel ) and set the NIC parameters then everything flew , also just
because it works in windoze is not indication that it will work in linux , not
that this is a bad thing
so unfortunately I still have to keep a dos boot disk with my NIC dosutil's to set
things up.....
the one thing that has always slowed the setup of linux for me has been conflicts
between plug-n-play devices ( my sound cards and nics and modems ) so if you are
able to just disable that feature and manually configure everything and you will
be much happier , I have been having a ball with mandrake and KDE :^))
Douglas Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In article <7dhi5t$169$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to install slackware linux in our PC. I have tried many
> things
> > but could not make the network card up.
> >
> > The Windows device manager shows the network card with these settings.
> >
> > 3Com Fast Etherlink XL 10/100Mb Tx Ethernet NIC
> > 3C905B - TX.
> > IRQ-11, Memory Range 08000100-0800017F
> > I/O Range 1080-10FF
> >
> > When I boot the linux system I get this message which results in some other
> > error messages (SIOC.. fail because eth0 setup failure)
> >
> > The PCI BIOS has not enabled this device! Updating PCI command 0014->0015
> > eth0: 3Com 3C905B Cyclone 100BaseTx at 0xd480, 00:10:5a:9e:a8:19, IRQ 255
> >
> > *** Warning: IRQ 255 is unlikely to work! ***
> > 8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split, autoselect/NWay Autonegotiation interface.
> > Enabling bus-master transmits and whole-frame receives.
> > 3c59x.c:v0.99E 5/12/98....
> >
> > Has anyone familiar with this problem?. Do I need to disable plug and play
> > stuff?.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mohan.
> >
> > -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> > http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
> >
>
> I have exactly the same problem myself (though with a different brand
> ethernet card, SOHOware, so it doesn't seem to be card specific). Please let
> me know if you figure it out. There is some way you can add a string in LILO
> where you can set the IRQ it uses, I think (I'm just repeating what I read in
> LINUX Secrets), so I may try that.
>
> Anyone have any insight on how to fix this problem?
>
> Thanks in advance for any help you can give.
>
> Ed
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
