Linux-Networking Digest #13, Volume #11 Sun, 2 May 99 08:13:54 EDT
Contents:
InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P (InocuLAN)
InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P (InocuLAN)
InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P (InocuLAN)
InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P (InocuLAN)
InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P (InocuLAN)
Re: Module-info file in /boot (Jayasuthan [VorHacker])
ppp dial out through a modem pool/terminal server ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
APC Smart-UPS 420 and Linux ("Johan Van Gompel")
Re: UID for at command missing (Jayasuthan [VorHacker])
Connecting Win98 to linux ("Steve Wiltshire")
pppd: 244000 not supported (chris)
Re: Newbie... DNS question (Randy Sandberg)
Re: Free US$5 for your gambling (Juz)
Re: Starcraft with IP Masquerading (LinuxBoy)
pppd 2.3.6 error!! ("Jack Zhu")
Re: RedHat 5.1 ControlPanel error (LinuxBoy)
Re: Email with Earthlink, Sendmail, exmh, mh, Linux libc5 (Andrew Gideon)
Re: Installing Linux and NT (LinuxBoy)
Re: Firewall logging and ipchains? (LinuxBoy)
Re: IPChains loses its settings (LinuxBoy)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: InocuLAN
Subject: InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 04:03:24 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947A.A29499F2
Content-Type: text/plain
The (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus was detected in (Public
Folders\Happy99.exe) and was sent by (Steve Wiltshire). Action: (File
was not Cured, Renaming.).
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947A.A29499F2
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox =
(Public Folders), Sender (Steve Wiltshire) !!!</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus was detected in =
(Public Folders\Happy99.exe) and was sent by (Steve Wiltshire). Action: =
(File was not Cured, Renaming.).</FONT></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947A.A29499F2==
------------------------------
From: InocuLAN
Subject: InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 04:03:24 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947A.A2818722
Content-Type: text/plain
The (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus was detected in (Public
Folders\Happy99.exe) and was sent by (Steve Wiltshire). Action: (File
was not Cured, Renaming.).
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947A.A2818722
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox =
(Public Folders), Sender (Steve Wiltshire) !!!</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus was detected in =
(Public Folders\Happy99.exe) and was sent by (Steve Wiltshire). Action: =
(File was not Cured, Renaming.).</FONT></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947A.A2818722==
------------------------------
From: InocuLAN
Subject: InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 04:11:54 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947B.D2573482
Content-Type: text/plain
The (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus was detected in (Public
Folders\Happy99.exe) and was sent by (Steve Wiltshire). Action: (File
was not Cured, Renaming.).
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947B.D2573482
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox =
(Public Folders), Sender (Steve Wiltshire) !!!</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus was detected in =
(Public Folders\Happy99.exe) and was sent by (Steve Wiltshire). Action: =
(File was not Cured, Renaming.).</FONT></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947B.D2573482==
------------------------------
From: InocuLAN
Subject: InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 04:11:54 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947B.D2821ED6
Content-Type: text/plain
The (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus was detected in (Public
Folders\Happy99.exe) and was sent by (Steve Wiltshire). Action: (File
was not Cured, Renaming.).
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947B.D2821ED6
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox =
(Public Folders), Sender (Steve Wiltshire) !!!</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus was detected in =
(Public Folders\Happy99.exe) and was sent by (Steve Wiltshire). Action: =
(File was not Cured, Renaming.).</FONT></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947B.D2821ED6==
------------------------------
From: InocuLAN
Subject: InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox (P
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 04:11:54 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947B.D2A84476
Content-Type: text/plain
The (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus was detected in (Public
Folders\Happy99.exe) and was sent by (Steve Wiltshire). Action: (File
was not Cured, Renaming.).
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947B.D2A84476
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2448.0">
<TITLE>InocuLAN detected the (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus in Mailbox =
(Public Folders), Sender (Steve Wiltshire) !!!</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The (Win95.Spanska_Happy99) virus was detected in =
(Public Folders\Happy99.exe) and was sent by (Steve Wiltshire). Action: =
(File was not Cured, Renaming.).</FONT></P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
======_=_NextPart_001_01BE947B.D2A84476==
------------------------------
From: Jayasuthan [VorHacker] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Module-info file in /boot
Date: 2 May 99 10:13:18 GMT
Demetrius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: The Module-info file in /boot in redhat linux. What is it for? Why when I
: recompile a new kernel does it not get updated? Can anyone give me a brief
: tutorial on this file?
: Thanks
: Demetrius
I'm not very sure but.. I try... /boot file is where ur map file keeped.
Went ever u update kernel ur kernel is dump under /vmlinuz and not
/boot/vmlinuz ... olny some boot loader life will be updates....
I hope it helps
--
==========
Jayasuthan
[Internal Linux System]
http://eplx01/suthan/
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[External]
http://still.working.on
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ppp dial out through a modem pool/terminal server
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 14:32:01 GMT
I am currently trying to find some info on the following:
My company has a modem pool (3Com HiPer Arc) where you can telnet to a
certain port and issue AT modem commands. Once I dial, I get a terminal on a
remote system. What I would like to be able to do is to use this for dial
out ppp service (basically, use the linux box to ppp dial out through the
modem pool). The problem is, I need that to show up as a /dev/xxx entry, for
pppd to take over (as far as I can tell). I have been researching several
how-to's and other docs, and see some vague references to doing something
like a "reverse telnet" and various other possibilities, however, I have seen
nothing concrete. I have also been researching other modem pool type
products, and some seem to come with software for this, however, the 3Com
does not. I have read the 3Com docs, and they state that I should simply
"install a pseudo-tty driver to make the modem appear as a local modem",
however, I don't know what I need to do in order to do that. Any help is
greatly appreciated, as are repies directly to me as well as to here
(mikeb.AT.davox.DOT.com) (remove all "." and replace AT and DOT)
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: "Johan Van Gompel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: APC Smart-UPS 420 and Linux
Date: 26 Apr 1999 17:57:19 GMT
Hello,
I've been trying to get an APC Smart-UPS 420 to work with Linux (Slackware,
libc5, 2.0.36 kernel) but to no avail. apcupsd 3.5.8 (compiled source)
keeps saying 'PANIC: cannot talk to UPS'. Same thing with the 3.5.6 binary.
Does anyone have an apcupsd.conf for this UPS? I'm under the impression
there's something wrong with the serial port (Asus P5A-B mobo) because my
USR 56K modem seemed 'dead' on /dev/ttyS0, not even responding to a simple
AT command. With an apcupsd.conf from a fellow Smart-UPS 420 user I can
rule out any problem on the software side.
Please mail me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well as posting to this newsgroup.
--
Johan Van Gompel
------------------------------
From: Jayasuthan [VorHacker] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: UID for at command missing
Date: 2 May 99 10:19:53 GMT
Bob McLaren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Check you /etc/at.deny and /etc/at.allow <--
: I tried to use "at" today and my server stated that the UID could not be
: found. What UID is it looking for?
: --
: Bob McLaren
: Network Administration
: Financial Statement Services, Inc.
: HTTP://WWW.FSSI-CA.COM
--
==========
Jayasuthan
[Internal Linux System]
http://eplx01/suthan/
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[External]
http://still.working.on
smtp%"[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
------------------------------
From: "Steve Wiltshire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Connecting Win98 to linux
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 10:32:08 GMT
I am having problems connecting a Win98 pc to a linux pc, they both have PCI
Ethernet adapters in them and can ping themselves but no each other. I think
that the network settings on the Win98 pc are wrong, could anyone advise me.
(If there is a file attached to this document then do not run it - I have
had virus problems today, should be ok now)
------------------------------
From: chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: pppd: 244000 not supported
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 06:04:18 -0500
This message appers in /var/log/messages when i try to use my new 56k
modem. i edited my ppp-on script to use the new connect speed (and the
new phone number). It turns out, actually, that 115200 (28.8 X 4) is the
highest value that doesn't produce this error. How can I find the speed
at which I am transfering data? Can I just ignore this message?
It does feel like a 28.8 connection, but it's been one day, and I
haven't guaged the general vagaries of net congestion yet.
------------------------------
From: Randy Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie... DNS question
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 23:50:58 -0700
Michael Balderas wrote:
>
> On Sat, 01 May 1999 18:06:26 -0700, Randy Sandberg
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >slave everything seems okay until I get a "Permission denied" statement
> >in regards to downloading my 2 db.* files.
> >
> >BTW, my master computer is using named 8.x and my slave or really
> >secondary is using named 4.9.x. I used the h2n perl script to create all
> >my DNS files. And yes, I created one set with the -v 8 argument for bind
> >8* and -v 4 for bind 4*.
>
> I read this to mean you have your bind 8 server (your primary)
> administering 2 zones, and for each zone it's serving two seperate
> files??? I seem to recall that ISC says on their site that Bind 4
> doesn't work well at all as a secondary and they recommend you run
> either servers as both 8 or both 4. Unfortunately, ISC.ORG is
> unreachable at the time I write this so I cannot confirm this with
> facts as to one way or the other. Do you have your bind 8 zone files
> configured with your bind 4 server as the secondary delegation for the
> zones in question?
>
> Mike
Hello Mike, thanks for the response. Okay, I only have one zone (i.e.,
deathstar.net). My whole network is isolated (i.e., not connected to the
Internet). The files on my primary DNS server (RedHat 5.2 PC) are
located in the /var/named directory. The files that the secondary DNS
server are trying to download are: "db.deathstar" and "db.10.1". My IP
address on my primary server is 10.1.2.1 and the secondary is 10.1.2.2.
My subnet mask is: 255.255.0.0.
All seems fine except that the secondary server can't get the files
(i.e., "db.deathstar" and "db.10.1") when named starts up. I've read the
manuals and nothing seems to explain how to setup permissions so that
the secondary server can read and download from the primary. Thus, I
keep getting a "permission denied" statement from the secondary server
when it tries to download the files.
So, one primary DNS server (named 8.x) and one secondary DNS server
(named 4.9.x) on a flat (i.e., non-routed) isolated network.
--
Randy Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed... Oh wait,
he does!"
-- A signature spotted on Slashdot
------------------------------
From: Juz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.m68k,comp.os.linux.powerpc
Subject: Re: Free US$5 for your gambling
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 03:09:51 -0400
I wish I was god.
------------------------------
From: LinuxBoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Starcraft with IP Masquerading
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 01:11:49 -0700
Daniel,
I don't know if I can help you but I will give you some advise and input.
You are masquerading under linux and I take it that you are using ipfwadm to
do this. If so you have to go to metalab.unc.edu and read their HOWTOs on
ipfwadm and firewalls. Also there is some good links to this issue on
www.linuxapps.com under the networking and security section. Also I play
starcraft too and its main protocal for LANs is IPX/SPX. If you are using it
this way you have to install the modules for IPX support and Appletalk (you
can see this message come up at boot time). Let me know how it works, and if
you have any other input or questions you can reach me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
LinuxBoy
thebyte wrote:
> Hello all. We have 2 computers here linked to a linux box for IP
> Masquerading. We are now attempting to play starcraft thru this connection
> but it is not working too well. Sometimes we can even start games but it
> times out almost right away, and there is lots of lag. Does anyone know
> any settings to that we can get this to work? Any help would be great?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel Trewella
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Jack Zhu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: pppd 2.3.6 error!!
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 03:08:52 -0400
Linux kernal is 2.2.1. My old pppd is 2.2.0. I heard that pppd 2.2.0 doesn't
work under kernal 2.2.1, so I download the 2.3.6 version PPPD. After compile
and install, when I try to run "pppd" to connect to my ISP, the error
message is:
pppd: peer authentication required but no suitable secret(s) found
pppd: for authentication any peer to us(ABCD)
"ABCD" is my username for connect to my ISP.
My ISP uses "PAP authentication". And I did add correct content in
"pap-secret" file.
So what's wrong? Any idea?
Help me out!! Thanks a lot!!
Pls email me!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: LinuxBoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: RedHat 5.1 ControlPanel error
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 01:20:17 -0700
David,
WOW! It looks like you have some problems. Well if you can afford it,
I would suggest reinstalling linux. If you can't afford to do this, I
would suggest installing all fo the libXXXX etc libraries. It looks to me
that you are having some dependency problems. Since you don't have any
control panel to work with you will have to install the libraries by hand.
Here is how to do it if you dont know how.
1. put you cd into your drive and mount it with mount -t iso9660
/dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom
You have a SCSI cdrom you will have to type mount -t iso9660 /dev/scd0
/mnt/cdrom
2. change you directory to /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS
3. list the contents but go one page at a time with ls | more
4. scroll down untill you see the lib packages and intall them with
rpm -ivh libXXX etc
Hope you can fix it. Sorry that I was not much help but I have never seen
this problem before.
LinuxBoy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Hinz wrote:
> When I select the kernel config button, network config button or
> Package Management button from the control-panel application I get the
> following error:
>
> Traceback (innermost last):
> File "/usr/lib/rhs/netcfg/netcfg.py", line 23, in ?
> from Tkinter import *
> File "/usr/lib/python1.5/lib-tk/Tkinter.py", line 5, in ?
> import _tkinter * If this fails your Python is not configured
> for TkImportError: libtix4.1.8.0.so: cannot open shared object file: No
> such file or directory
>
> Is there a package that I need to add to get the libtix4.1.8.0.so?
>
> I haven't added any patches since I loaded RH 5.1.
>
> david.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Gideon)
Crossposted-To: comp.mail.sendmail,comp.mail.mh,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Email with Earthlink, Sendmail, exmh, mh, Linux libc5
Date: 18 Apr 1999 22:00:45 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jim Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>If I had to guess, I'd guess that these providers got tired of receiving
>spam from Earthlink and have denied access to the entire domain because
>Earthlink refuses to deal with spam appropriately.
>
>Just a guess...
>
It might be a variation of this, too.
For example, many places use either a public or private list of
IP addresses that are dialups. SMTP connections from these addresses
are disallowed. As was pointed out, this is a way that the problem
of junk email is being attacked.
Then, there are other possibilities.
The best best is to ask GULF.NET why specifically these messages
are being rejected. We get requests like this every so often
(although we try to keep this down with SMTP errors messages that
are more informative than "access denied"). GULF.NET is the proper
place to address your question because it is (judging from
your message) pompano.pcola.gulf.net that is rejecting the SMTP
traffic.
Most likely, they'll be happy to explain why (although you should
be ready for a suggestion that you change ISPs). If it does turn
out to be that GULF.NET rejects connections from dialups, then the
solution is to (as others have pointed out) pass all your SMTP
traffic via Earthlink's servers. This actually has other advantages
for you as well, so it's a good idea regardless of the problem
with GULF.NET.
- Andrew
------------------------------
From: LinuxBoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Installing Linux and NT
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 01:43:57 -0700
Clair,
If you want to dual boot a machine you have to intall NT first and then
Linux. When install linux, at the end of the install it will ask you if you
have any other OSs you would like to boot to from lilo (Linux Loader), say yes
and select the partitions that have NT on them and give them a name like
windowsNT. I take it that you are using redhat because in versions 5.1 and
newer they have a program called diskdruid to install linux. Let me know how it
goes.
LinuxBoy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clair Mooza wrote:
> I want to install both Linux and NT server. I don't know jack about what to
> do (well maybe a half jack, but that's about it). I am unsure of the best
> way to do it, any recommendations?
>
> Thanks in advance!!
>
> -What'sHerFace?
------------------------------
From: LinuxBoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.linux
Subject: Re: Firewall logging and ipchains?
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 01:47:39 -0700
Matt,
You have to add the parameter -o to the ipchains lines. This will logg all of
the data hitting your firewall. This parameter is for ipfwadm but should still
work in ipchains. If you type man ipchains at the termial you should see a
parameter similar to -o . If so this will put everything into the directory
/var/log in the files messages and secure. Hope I was of help.
LinuxBoy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Siemens wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for a way to log everything hitting my firewall (accepted, denied
> and rejected packets), but I can't figure out how to do this. I've been
> playing around with ipchains and I am able to log specific rules, but I can't
> seem to log the actions of a default policy. For example:
>
> ipchains -A input DENY
> ipchains -A input -i eth0 -p tcp -s 0.0.0.0/0 -d 1.2.3.4/32 80 -l -j ACCEPT
>
> Let's say these are the firewall rules I'm using. If someone tries to connect
> to the firewall (1.2.3.4/eth0) from the internet, via the web (port 80), they
> are able to do so and the connection is logged as accepted, hence the '-l'
> switch. But, if someone from the net tries to connect using ftp, they are
> denied access (as per the default input policy) but this transaction does not
> seem to make it into my system logs. How can I log traffic that is being
> filtered by a default policy in ipchains? Can I use ipchains to do
> firewall logging, or is there a better solution?
>
> I'm using Red Hat 5.2 with kernel 2.2.3 which is configure to run as a
> firewall. I've been reading howto papers all day, but I can't seem to find
> anything that specifically deals with firewall logging.
>
> Any info or suggestions would be very much appreciated!
>
> --Matt
------------------------------
From: LinuxBoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPChains loses its settings
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 01:53:08 -0700
Yves,
You have to make a script file and put all of thes settings into it
and have it run at boot time. See the HOWTO pages at metalab.unc.edu.
LinuxBoy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yves Van de Weyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If have the following configuration :
> - RedHat Linux 5.1 Kernel v2.2.5
> - ipchains 1.3.8
> I have configured several rules in Ipchains but sometimes all these
> rules disappear and I have to restore the settings.
>
> Can anyone help me with this problem ?
> Thanks,
>
> Yves Van de Weyer.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
