Linux-Networking Digest #17, Volume #11 Sun, 2 May 99 19:13:59 EDT
Contents:
Problem with news-server (Olaf Thorbruegge)
Re: ipmasq & traceroute issues (Stephen)
Re: Printing to Apple LaserWriter 8500 remote (MacPiano)
Re: DEC PCI Fast Ethernet DECchip 21142 ([EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul E. Larson))
Re: Connecting 2 network together (mist)
Re: Linux < -- > Windows NT network (mist)
Re: Linux DHCP with Windows 95? (John Kenyon)
Re: Help: just rebuilt a lower kernel (John Kenyon)
Re: DEC PCI Fast Ethernet DECchip 21142 (Frank Sweetser)
Re: ipchains help please ("d. divine")
Re: ipchains help please ("d. divine")
Re: Buggy 3C574, or buggy administrator? (Karl Heinz Kremer)
Re: Help -- Two ethernet card network ("Jeff Volckaert")
Mail server for multiple domain using a single IP address ("Alex Fong")
ipop3d stops (Ken Nagorski)
internet and my network card not working together, what did i miss? or not do?
(Keyman)
Re: Printing to Apple LaserWriter 8500 remote (Kastner)
Problem with 'Hot Swap' for the Lucent's Wavelan PC card! (Christophe Janneteau)
Re: ipfwadmmm question ("Grant Lowe")
Re: How to FTP PUT a whole directory? ("Ian Lunam")
Two 3c509's, 2.2 kernel (Andrew Seila)
Re: Linux Uptimes (John Thompson)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Olaf Thorbruegge)
Subject: Problem with news-server
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 21:26:54 GMT
Hello!
I set up an isdn-dial-in-server about a year ago and about 2 months
ago I added a news-system (c-news) and everything was working fine.
Just about a week ago the trouble began and I ran out of ideas, so I
thought I just might ask the wonderful linux-community. :) (Caution!
slime-tracks!)
The problems:
a) The news system is unavailable at unpredictable times for both, the
internal LAN and for dial-in-users. Just a full reboot helps.
b) Other than before for now about a week it is impossible to retrieve
news for LAN-users while somebody is connected from the outside.
The system:
SUSE Linux 5.1 partially updated with packages from 5.3 and 6.0.
AMD K6-200 with 32M RAM
2 AVM ISDN Fritz!-Cards for dial-in (as I mentioned the dial-in works
fine).
Some clues.
Problem a) might be a hardware-problem, since this is an old house and
trucks going by the main street get the whole house vibrating. The
keyboard or keyboard-socket may have a fault. (I found it not working
once and some playing with the cable fixed that :~)
I don't have any concerning problem b)
If somebody has an idea it would be nice to have the answers by mail.
If I find a solution I'll post it to the newsgroup.
Thanks in advance,
Taar (Olaf Thorbruegge)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen)
Subject: Re: ipmasq & traceroute issues
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 22:36:41 +0100
In article <7giek5$di9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Paul Darbonne
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) mentioned:
> Traceroute has a -i switch which allows an interface to be specified. I.E.
> traceroute -i ppp0 will trace starting with ppp0 rather than eth0
Thanks for the tip. I'll use that, then. It does seem odd, though, that
rather than use the default route (ppp0 is the default root -- there is
no default route when not dialed in) it chooses the other one. That
makes no sense to me...
Regards,
sj
--
[ Stephen | sj AT bigfoot DOT com (blame spammers for munged address) ]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MacPiano)
Subject: Re: Printing to Apple LaserWriter 8500 remote
Date: 1 May 1999 13:21:01 GMT
I've tried lpr, the name of the printer, you name it. I do use netatalk. The
only way I can get my other macs to see any printer on my linux box is use lp
for printing in the printtol and use lp in the papd file, but I can then only
use one printer.
Gary
------------------------------
From: whistler<blahblah>@twcny.rr.com (Paul E. Larson)
Subject: Re: DEC PCI Fast Ethernet DECchip 21142
Date: Sun, 02 May 1999 21:42:25 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Does the following network DEC chip work with linux and
>NT4... DEC PCI Fast Ethernet DECchip 21142
>
Oh yeah, very nice chipset. Works in everything. You need to use the Tulip
drivers.
Paul
Get rid of the blahs to email me :}
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Connecting 2 network together
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 21:47:58 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jean-Rene Cormier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>I was wondering how I could connect 2 network together. One is using
>Coax and the other RG-45 I was thinking of using a Linux box in between
>with 2 cards in it can anyone tell me if there is anything special I
>would need to do so that both network can see each other.
Read up on IP masquerading / IP forwarding. It's quite possible and
fairly easy to do. Easier with the newer 2.2.* kernel.
>And will IPX
>work so that computers from both network can see each other in Network
>Neiborhood in Win 95/98???
Why not run TCP/IP on everything instead of IPX? IPX should, however,
work so long as the kernel is configured to support it.
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux < -- > Windows NT network
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 21:52:00 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Amir Malik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>I am trying to connect my Linux machine to my NT machine.
>
>My Red Hat Linux 5.1 machine has an IP address of 192.168.0.1 and my NT
>machine has an IP address of 192.168.0.2. This is what the HOSTS file
>looks on both machines:
>
>127.0.0.1 localhost
>192.168.0.1 amir
>192.168.0.2 pc404hp
>
>
>They are both connected via a hub. I can ping localhost, 127.0.0.1, and
>192.168.0.2 on the NT machine and I can ping localhost, 127.0.0.1, and
>192.168.0.1 on the Linux machine. But, I can't ping the NT machine from
>the Linux machine, and vice versa.
>
>How can I ping one machine from the other?
>
Have you set up the routing information? Does stuff other than ping work?
Are the network cards configured properly and working? Does the hub work?
What's the output from route and ifconfig on the Linux box?
ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.0.255 up
route add -net 192.168.0.0
if you've not already done that, or it's not set up for you...
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: John Kenyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux DHCP with Windows 95?
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 14:17:54 +0100
Doesn't sound like a DHCP problem to me.
DHCP just assigns IP addresses to boxes on the network (when asked).
Reboot the Win95 box, and look in the /var/adm/syslog or
/var/adm/messages files on the Linux boxes, for DHCP messages.
You should see entries when the Win95 box requests, the Linux box offers
and then when the Win95 box accepts the IP address.
If you see this then its 90pc certain that your dhcpd is working.
Then on the Win95 box run the winipcfg utility, and check that you
have an IP address assigned to your network card. 0.0.0.0 means
that you have DHCP problems.
If you see a "proper" address then click on the Renew button.
The lease date should change.
Assuming that works then you are looking at either a Samba
configuration problem on the Linux box (if installed), or a Windows
Networking problem.
/John
jim walski wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> i am running a linux server(red hat 5.2) in which i am trying to set up a
> DHCP server.
> I am using the following dhcp.conf file:
>
> default-lease-time 600;
> max-lease-time 7200;
> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
> option broadcast-address 160.100.0.255;
> option domain-name-servers 160.100.0.246;
> option netbios-name-servers 160.100.0.248;
> option domain-name "classicplan.com";
>
> subnet 160.100.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> range 160.100.0.180 160.100.0.185;
> }
>
> When i try to log in with a win 95 client it tells me There is no domain
> server to validate your password. and it also gives me errors about Shares i
> have established. I don't know if it is having problems finding the primary
> domain controller for NT ( the primary domain controller is 160.100.0.248).
> the IP address seems to get established fine. In the win 95 network section
> if i set the ip address manually everything works fine.
>
> Any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks, Jim
------------------------------
From: John Kenyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help: just rebuilt a lower kernel
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 14:09:01 +0100
Vishal S Shah wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I built kernel 2.0.30. However, it totally disables my existing network.
> I was running 2.0.36 before that I everything ran fine.
>
> does anyone have any suggestions?
>
Yes:
1) Stick with 2.0.36 unless you have a good reason to change.
Most 3rd party kernel drivers should work with later kernels anyway.
2) Make sure you have configured the correct network support, if
you insist on using 2.0.30.
3) If that doesn't work and you still want 2.0.30, delete the .config
file in the 2.0.30 directory and configure from scratch.
(1) is the best plan though - if it ain't broke don't fix it!
/john
------------------------------
From: Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DEC PCI Fast Ethernet DECchip 21142
Date: 02 May 1999 17:37:35 -0400
Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Does the following network DEC chip work with linux and
> NT4... DEC PCI Fast Ethernet DECchip 21142
sure - use the tulip driver under linux.
--
Frank Sweetser rasmusin at wpi.edu fsweetser at blee.net | PGP key available
paramount.ind.wpi.edu RedHat 5.2 kernel 2.2.5 i586 | at public servers
Any false value is gonna be fairly boring in Perl, mathematicians
notwithstanding.
-- Larry Wall in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
------------------------------
From: "d. divine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipchains help please
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 09:38:56 -0500
I'm sure you'll get some better advice but:
1. Do all chains show "no chain by that name"
ipchains -P forward ACCEPT
ipchains -P input ACCEPT
ipchains -P output ACCEPT
If the answer is yes and it was me I would recompile again - probably with
the 2.2.5 kernel because ipchains is recognizing none of the built in
chains.
Anjan Sen wrote in message ...
>Hello,
>
>I have a system that is Red Hat 5.2, with the kernel newly upgraded to
>2.2.7. I have a small private network with 192.168.*.* addreses, and this
>Linux box that acts as a gateway. It's on dialup and has a static ip
>address.
>
>Prior to the upgrade I was using ipfwadm to masquerade my private
>addresses like this, and it worked pretty well
>
> ipfwadm -F -p deny
> ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.1/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>
>Now, after the upgrade I attempted to get ipchains running in a very
>simple manner. I thought I'd start off by using Rusty's Three-Line guide
>To Masquerading found at www.rustcorp.com. My problem is that although I
>have the correct version of ipchains - 1.3.8 - even when i cut and
>paste the lines from my web browser, I get syntax errors from ipchains.
>For example
>
>root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> ipchains -P forward -j DENY
>ipchains: -P requires a chain and a policy
>Try `ipchains -h' or 'ipchains --help' for more information.
>root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> ipchains -A forward -i ppp0 -j MASQ
>ipchains: No chain by that name
>root@seYalion /usr/src/linux
>> ipchains --version
>ipchains 1.3.8, 27-Oct-1998
>
>This must be me doing something daft, but I can't see what. I have
>compiled the necessary support into my kernel
>
>root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> grep CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL .config
>CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL=y
>root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> grep CONFIG_FIREWALL .config
>CONFIG_FIREWALL=y
>
>and ifconfig shows me this
>
>ifconfig
>eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:7E:BB:87
> inet addr:192.168.1.2 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:2097 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:1757 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:4 txqueuelen:100
> Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
>
>lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
> RX packets:194 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:194 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>
>ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
> inet addr:158.152.160.123 P-t-P:158.152.1.222
>Mask:255.255.255.255
> UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:116 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:96 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
>
>Please can someone help me? I've searched everywhere but haven't found an
>answer.
>
>Thanks.
------------------------------
From: "d. divine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipchains help please
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 09:43:37 -0500
But his second line is right on the nose and he receives a "no chains found"
message:
ipchains -A forward -i ppp0 -j MASQ
This command should work without problems, but the error reports their is no
"forward" chain.
*******
Mac wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>You have to change the syntax you're using. It doesn't map one to one.
>
>For example, whenever you use the keyword deny or reject, you have to
>capitalize it for ipchains.
>
>And ipchains switched the order of arguments. For example, your second
>ipfwadm command below would look like this:
>
>ipchains -A foward -s 192.168.1.1/32 -d 0.0.0.0/0
>
>Note that parameters that used to be upper case are now lower case.
>
>Try looking at the man pages, you'll see these differences...
>
>Anjan Sen wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a system that is Red Hat 5.2, with the kernel newly upgraded to
>> 2.2.7. I have a small private network with 192.168.*.* addreses, and this
>> Linux box that acts as a gateway. It's on dialup and has a static ip
>> address.
>>
>> Prior to the upgrade I was using ipfwadm to masquerade my private
>> addresses like this, and it worked pretty well
>>
>> ipfwadm -F -p deny
>> ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.1/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>>
>> Now, after the upgrade I attempted to get ipchains running in a very
>> simple manner. I thought I'd start off by using Rusty's Three-Line guide
>> To Masquerading found at www.rustcorp.com. My problem is that although I
>> have the correct version of ipchains - 1.3.8 - even when i cut and
>> paste the lines from my web browser, I get syntax errors from ipchains.
>> For example
>>
>> root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> > echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
>> root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> > ipchains -P forward -j DENY
>> ipchains: -P requires a chain and a policy
>> Try `ipchains -h' or 'ipchains --help' for more information.
>> root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> > ipchains -A forward -i ppp0 -j MASQ
>> ipchains: No chain by that name
>> root@seYalion /usr/src/linux
>> > ipchains --version
>> ipchains 1.3.8, 27-Oct-1998
>>
>> This must be me doing something daft, but I can't see what. I have
>> compiled the necessary support into my kernel
>>
>> root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> > grep CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL .config
>> CONFIG_IP_FIREWALL=y
>> root@sealion /usr/src/linux
>> > grep CONFIG_FIREWALL .config
>> CONFIG_FIREWALL=y
>>
>> and ifconfig shows me this
>>
>> ifconfig
>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:24:7E:BB:87
>> inet addr:192.168.1.2 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:2097 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:1757 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:4 txqueuelen:100
>> Interrupt:10 Base address:0x300
>>
>> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
>> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
>> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
>> RX packets:194 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:194 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>
>> ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
>> inet addr:158.152.160.123 P-t-P:158.152.1.222
>> Mask:255.255.255.255
>> UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:116 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:96 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
>>
>> Please can someone help me? I've searched everywhere but haven't found an
>> answer.
>>
>> Thanks.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl Heinz Kremer)
Subject: Re: Buggy 3C574, or buggy administrator?
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 14:39:09 GMT
In article <7gbug2$qa8$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi there,
>
> i'm experiencing the same problem. Card looks fine but when i try to ping
> another PC
> on the subnet, ping hangs and i get no response.
>
> Maybe there's someon out there who can help is with this problem?
No. With a 3c574 you can either be lucky and it works right out of
the box, or it will not work for you.
There is howeve a small gray zone in between those two groups. You
might be able to get it to run with some extra work. I was able to
get the card to work by starting a ping to an external address and
then ejecting and re-inserting the card a couple of times until
the ping returned. However this worked only when most of the data
was going into the notebook. If I wanted to transmit lots of data
from the notebook to the outside world, the card was hanging.
As I understand it this is fixed with the latest version of the
PCMCIA software that you can get from
ftp://csb.stanford.edu/pub/pcmcia/NEW/
Give it a try.
Karl Heinz
--
Karl Heinz Kremer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.khk.net
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Volckaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help -- Two ethernet card network
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 08:52:17 -0400
Can 192.168.0.2 ping 192.168.0.1 (I assume you linux box)?
Are you using a hub? If not are you using a crossover cable instead of just
a straight through cable?
Try posting your ifconfig info.
Jeff Volckaert
Kevin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:M75U2.29$qu5.10505@WReNphoon4...
> Hi
>
> I am fairly new to Linux, but I do have the both of the cards working. I
> have a 1.PCI NE2000, and 2. Smc Ether Ultra ISA. In ifconfig, both cards
> are shown and the resources correct, but when I attempt to ping a maching
on
> the internal network (192.168.0.2 etc..), and I get no response. Any
Ideas?
> THe SMC is a Combo card using BNC thin coax for the internal and the
NE2000
> PCI with RJ45 for the Cable modem.
>
> Kevin =)
>
>
>
> -**** Posted from RemarQ, http://www.remarq.com/?c ****-
> Search and Read Usenet Discussions in your Browser
------------------------------
From: "Alex Fong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mail server for multiple domain using a single IP address
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 16:40:53 +0800
Does anyone know any good solution to configure a Linux box as smtp/pop3
mail server for multiple domain without using IP aliasing?
My problem is I would create email address like [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the same Linux box.
Thanks!
------------------------------
From: Ken Nagorski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipop3d stops
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 10:02:11 -0400
We are running redhat 5.2 and cucipop cucipop-1.21-1, It has been
working fine, however now it keeps stopping. I can restart inet and it
works for like 3 minutes and stops?
Has anyone seen this before? If you could give me some advice I would
appreciate it.
Thank you
Ken N
------------------------------
From: Keyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: internet and my network card not working together, what did i miss? or not
do?
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 09:52:59 -0500
i have caldera 2.2.5 intalled on a home built 586 with 16mb ram and a
1.3gb and a 213mb w/ 83mb just for swap space
my networkcard is a d-link pci 528, it was detected on install and i did
the configure for it. ( mostly default )
after i rebooted the local network works fine i can telnet from the
windows machine and ftp into my linux box.
now i set up kppp and it logs on fine not a problem BUT when i try to
load a page
ie.. www.infoseek.com or www.hotmail.com, it comes back with
no host in
www.infoseek.com
was there something i missed? or didn't setup
i havwe read the how-to's for isp hook up and most of 'nag'
would my gateway interfere with the internet?
thank's
keyman
------------------------------
From: Kastner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Printing to Apple LaserWriter 8500 remote
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 15:55:49 +0200
MacPiano wrote:
> I've tried lpr, the name of the printer, you name it. I do use netatalk. The
> only way I can get my other macs to see any printer on my linux box is use lp
> for printing in the printtol and use lp in the papd file, but I can then only
> use one printer.
>
> Gary
Hi Gary,
the thing is, I have tried to print to the 8500 from my Linux machine. Since I
have been told that the printer is capable to print postscript, I thought it
would work the same way like the "normal" postscript printers (Elite 12/600 and
HPs).
Since the print job is spooled nicely on the UNIX print server like for the
other printers, it is just that nothing happens at all at the printer side.
"lpr -P Appleprinter Filename.ps" will not work.
So my question is, if I do have to use netatalk (downloaded an Apple8500 *.PPD
file from Apple) how should I set up the "papd.conf" for example to be able to
use this configuration file during an "lpr" printjob?
The "getzones" and "nbplkp" programs can not find this particular LaserWriter,
so I assume it is in fact just integrated as an ordinary postscript printer?
Could you perhaps provide a "papd.conf" file with just a few explanations?
That would be really great and I would be very thankful since the man page for
"pap" seems not very helpful on this side.
Thank you very much in advance for your assistance.
Kind regards
Arne
------------------------------
From: Christophe Janneteau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Problem with 'Hot Swap' for the Lucent's Wavelan PC card!
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 17:42:46 +0200
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
I am using the Lucent's WaveLan Card under my laptop (gateway solo).
Everything's is OK with this card except I can't get 'hot PC card swap'
working with it!
On the same computer I have also an ethernet card with which hot swap is
working.
I am using the pcmcia-cs-3.0.8 version (with wavelan_cs).
I checked the news and the FAQ but found nothing related to this
problem.
Here is the /var/log/messages when removing and then re-inserting the
ethernet card (everything is Ok) in the pcmcia slot (eth0):
Apr 26 13:37:50 smart cardmgr[117]: shutting down socket 0
Apr 26 13:37:50 smart cardmgr[117]: executing: './network stop eth0'
Apr 26 13:37:50 smart cardmgr[117]: executing: 'rmmod 3c589_cs'
Apr 26 13:38:29 smart cardmgr[117]: initializing socket 0
Apr 26 13:38:29 smart cardmgr[117]: socket 0: 3Com 3c589D Ethernet
Apr 26 13:38:29 smart cardmgr[117]: executing: 'insmod
/lib/modules/2.2.3/pcmcia/3c589_cs.o'
Apr 26 13:38:29 smart kernel: eth0: 3Com 3c589, port 0x300, irq 3, Auto
port, hw_addr 00:60:0
8:BA:10:40
Apr 26 13:38:29 smart cardmgr[117]: executing: './network start eth0'
To get this working I configure the appropriate /etc/pcmica/network.opts
But When I try to remove the WaveLan card things go wrong. Here are the
only lines present in the log file:
Apr 26 13:39:04 smart cardmgr[117]: shutting down socket 1
Apr 26 13:39:04 smart cardmgr[117]: executing: './network stop eth1'
...it seems that the module is not unload.....
If I try to re-insert the wavelan card nothing's happen and if I try to
remove the ethernet card nothings happen neither....as if cardmgr was
blocked?!
Moreover, I can even not reboot normally my laptop (cause I gess network
stop fails...). I have to make a hard shutdown and then reboot (and wait
that fsck complete...).
Do you have any idea this could come from?
Thank you very much for your help!
Christophe.
--
Christophe Janneteau Centre de Recherche de Motorola - Paris
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Espace Technologique - Saint Aubin
Tel: +33 (0)1 69 35 25 48 91193 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex
Fax: +33 (0)1 69 35 25 01 France
------------------------------
From: "Grant Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipfwadmmm question
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 1999 09:12:04 -0700
Hi Mark.
Thanks for the reply. I'm using Red Hat 4.2, which has kernel 2.0.30. Now
what?
grant
Mark Cotherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> What kernel are you using?? If you are using 2.2.x, try using ipchains.
>
> Mark
>
> Grant Lowe wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm new to ipfwadm. Here's my question. I'm guessing on the linux box
> > with ipfwadm you need to add a second ip address? That is, an ip
> > address different than the one supplied by the ISP. If not, then just
> > the one supplied by the ISP? Also, when I try running
> > ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 -D 0.0.0.0/0, I get the
> > following message:
> > ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Invalid argument. What am I doing wrong?
> >
> > Thanks for any help.
> >
> > grant
>
------------------------------
From: "Ian Lunam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: How to FTP PUT a whole directory?
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 10:46:29 +1200
To put a whole directory:-
First, turn off prompting>
prompt
Then do a put with wildcards>
mput *
Done.
Ian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<7gij27$inu$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Can anyone tell me how to use FTP to PUT an entire directory to an FTP
>server? The default FTP appears to not allow this. Also, the X windows nftp
>program has a feature to do a recursive GET on a directory, but I don't see
>any way to do a recursive PUT of a directory. Mac & Win clients are able to
>do this, so is there a more powerful Linux FTP client out there that'll do
>this, possibly with a nice X interface??
>
>Thanks!
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Andrew Seila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.alpha
Subject: Two 3c509's, 2.2 kernel
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 15:43:27 GMT
I am trying to setup a router/firewall for my home lan using an Alpha
noname 233 mhz box. I have two 3Com 3c509B adapters installed, with pnp
disabled and irq's and i/o ports set as follows:
Adapter #1: IRQ 7, io 0x310
Adapter #2: IRQ 10, io 0x280
I know the default i/o port is 0x300. I tried that port and it worked
fine. So did the ones shown above. Adapter #2 is an older 3c509B combo
that I have used without a problem for about 2 years. Adapter #1 is a
new 3c509B -TPC. Since the NIC address for adapter #1 is lower than
that for adapter #2, adapter #1 is detected first.
The problem is that both adapters work fine using the 2.0.36 kernel, but
not using a 2.2 kernel. This is true whether I use modules or compile
the adapter driver into the kernel. I have tried kernels 2.2.2, 2.2.4,
2.2.5 and 2.2.7, and have used Alan Cox's patches. The current version
I am trying is 2.2.7-ac1. I have built a kernel with the 3c509 driver
as a module and I have built another 2.2.7 kernel with the 3c509 driver
built in so I can try both.
Here are the symptoms: When booting, right after recognizing both
adapters correctly, the system hangs. I responds to nothing except a
hardware reboot.
I can boot the 2.2.7 kernel if I keep both adapters from being detected
- either remove the lines in conf.modules that alias ethn to 3c509, or
in the kernel with built-in support, leave the "ether=0,0,eth1" off on
the boot line. The kernel boots and works fine with one adapter, but
not two.
I tried to just boot without ethernet support and set it up manually.
When I run "modprobe 3c509" both adapters are correctly detected.
However, when I try to configure either adapter, the system hangs. So,
it appears that the problem is that the system hangs when the adapters
are actually put to use.
I have spent perhaps 10 hours trying different configurations of adapter
settings and kernel version, but nothing I have tried works. It looks
like this is a problem that concerns _both_ using multiple adapters
_and_ the 2.2 kernel. The way the system hangs, I suspect that the
problem is a memory conflict or IRQ conflict. I have not tried all
possible memory and IRQ combinations, however.
Has anyone had a similar problem? Is this a bug in the kernel or device
driver?
I would appreciate any help!
Andy Seila
------------------------------
From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux Uptimes
Date: Sat, 01 May 1999 07:24:40 -0600
D. C. & M. V. Sessions wrote:
> Joern Smock wrote:
>
> > "flush the RAM"? What for?
> Microsoft tunes their operating systems to get better benchmark
> numbers by not defragmenting free memory. Saves quite a bit,
> actually, and the results only show up after a long period of use.
...which isn't usually an issue with MS systems... :-)
--
-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
