Linux-Networking Digest #47, Volume #11 Wed, 5 May 99 08:13:38 EDT
Contents:
Re: RH 5.2 Breaks PCMCIA Token Ring ?? (James Knott)
Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly (Bill Unruh)
Re: W98 can ping Linux; Linux can't ping W98?? ("Curt")
Network failure during heavy traffic ("Craig Sanders")
Re: Problems with dialing in (Przem Kowalczyk)
Re: HELP - 3c589/Thinkpad 770X and ethernet random behavior... ("Sunil P. Khatri")
linux login automatically ("Col")
Re: serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner? (Ingo Ciechowski)
intermittant network success ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet (Richard Steiner)
Re: IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet (Richard Steiner)
Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly (Ken Cormack)
Re: diald (Villy Kruse)
Re: Direct Cable PPP connection between Linux and Win95 (Rob van der Putten)
Re: Apache password authentication (Kevin Colquitt)
linux box login ("Col")
connecting two networks w/o a router?? (Azfar Kazmi)
Re: IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Network failure during heavy traffic ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Help with "route" command (Wai Fai, Yee)
Re: Tulip - Linksys LNE100TX - Etherfast 10/100 LAN Card (Donald Becker)
Re: IP Aliasing problems ("Curt")
Re: PPP over Ethernet (anthony classick)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Knott)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: RH 5.2 Breaks PCMCIA Token Ring ??
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 05:58:37 -0400
Reply-To: James Knott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Iain Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I upgraded from 5.0 -> 5.2 and it breaks my PCMCIA Token Ring card :-(
I use an IBM Auto 16/4 token ring PCMCIA card in a ThinkPad 760E. It
works well. However, to get it to work, I had to modify a line in
config.opts regarding memory exclude range.
--
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
The above opinions are my own and not those of ISM Corp., a subsidiary of
IBM Canada Ltd.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly
Date: 5 May 1999 06:21:26 GMT
In <7go4ns$4oq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Robert Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Where is everyone getting RH6.0? I thought it wasn't available until the
>10th May....
Nope been out at least a week by now.
www.redhat.com and all its mirrors. The pressing shops probably will not
be shipping for another week however.
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: W98 can ping Linux; Linux can't ping W98??
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 05:42:16 -0500
Can you post the result of netstat -nr ? Do you have a route to the local
net?
Also I noticed the MTU on your loopback address is 3924. This usually is
3584.
I don't know that this would cause any problem though.
Mark Larimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Okay... the Win98 machine can ping the Linux box, telnet to it, ftp to it.
> But the Linux box can't ping the Win98 machine!?
>
> Win98: 192.168.1.1
> Linux (RedHat 6): 192.168.1.2
>
> [larimer@quazi /root]# ifconfig
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:33:D9:AB:21
> inet addr:192.168.1.2 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:633 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:526 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> Interrupt:5 Base address:0x300
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
> RX packets:232 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:232 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>
> When the Linux box tries to ping the W98 machine, both "Act" lights on the
> two NICs blink...but it still gets 100% packet loss.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Any help would be huge.
> Thanks...
> --mark
>
> --
> **********************************************************
> *** FantasyBowl.com Play Fantasy Football ***
> *** http://fantasybowl.com 1999 Grand Opening! ***
> *** ***
> *** Mark D. Larimer ***
> *** [EMAIL PROTECTED] (651) 645-5623 ***
> **********************************************************
------------------------------
From: "Craig Sanders" <csanders*NOSPAM*@placs.net>
Subject: Network failure during heavy traffic
Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 23:15:04 -0500
I have a Redhat 5.2 server functioning as a file/print server. In some cases
involving heavy network traffic, the node completely disappears from the
network.
If I have one Win95 machine copy files from one share to another on the
linux machine while another is doing the same, Linux disappears and the
Win95 machines report that the network device no longer exists. Linux is no
longer reachable using smb, ftp, telnet, or ping. Nor can it ping other
machines on the network. It's as if the cable simply unplugged itself. While
it's alive, I see what seems to me excessive collisions.
I've tried different hubs, different cables, even a different network card.
I've tried plugging all computers into the same hub. The machine returns to
earth when I deactivate and reactivate the interface. I have complaints from
one user that network file access is slower than with the old NT server (may
not be related, included it just in case).
Hubs are 10/100 as are NICs on machines in question. Started with a Netgear
FA310TX (including installation of the provided driver) and changed to
Realtek. I've given up on it being a hardware problem. Can anyone clue me in
on what may be configured wrong?
Thanks,
Craig
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Przem Kowalczyk)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Problems with dialing in
Date: 4 May 1999 21:29:22 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eusebio Garate in comp.os.linux.misc wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have Redhat 5.2 installed and the system is connected to the net via
>the university where I work. Everything (telnet into and out of the
>system, ftp, etc ) works fine.
>
>I have tried to setup this linux system as a server to accept dial-ins
>from another linux system (my home system). I set things up for PAP and
>auto-ppp. Mgetty answers the modem and I believe the kernel is
>appropriately configured. I can dialin and the modem is answered and the
>client is assigned an IP address. After the login is completed I can
>telnet to the server but not by telnetting to its hostname.domainname
>but rather by telnetting to its IP address. However, I cannot telnet,
>ftp, etc. except to the server.
>
>The IP address I chose to assign to the client is a bogus IP address. By
>this I mean that it is not a valid IP address on the University's net.
>After reading various HOWTO's I thought this was OK but apparently it is
>not. It seems that the client cannot access the University's
>nameservers (the IP address of the nameservers is in the clients
>resolv.conf file).
>
>Any suggestions (short of getting a valid IP address from the
>University)?
If you're using prive (non-legal) IP you have to run masquerade on the
serwer (find something like masq*-howto). The server should have also IP
forwarding turned on.
If you can get legal IP (from your university class) you have only turn ip
forwarding on on the serwer.
Don't forget to set /etc/resolv.conf on your home machine (if you don't
know how to do it check in ISP-Hook-Howto and Net-3-Howto)
Przem
--
you wake up in the mornig
and fall out of your bed
R.E.M
------------------------------
From: "Sunil P. Khatri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: HELP - 3c589/Thinkpad 770X and ethernet random behavior...
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 03:02:11 GMT
David Hinds wrote:
>
> You can also try the beta on csb.stanford.edu in /pub/pcmcia/NEW.
> I've been working on the 3c589 driver and it's possible that it might
> be more consistently initialized.
>
I checked out pcmcia 3.0.10, and the problem seems to have gone. I have
tested
the new version of the package for a day now, and each time I have the
same
hardware address, and proper ethernet initialization...
Thanks for the helpful suggestions!
Sunil
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Col" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Col" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux login automatically
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 17:32:47 +0200
Gday people....has anyone got any idea how to make a linux box login
automatically???
-Col
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ingo Ciechowski)
Crossposted-To: de.comp.os.msdos,de.comm.software.misc,de.comp.os.unix.networking
Subject: Re: serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner?
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 13:00:41 +0200
> >wer kennt ein Programm, das mir Zugriff auf einen DOS-Rechner �ber dessen
> >serielle Schnittstelle erm�glicht - w�hrend andere Programme auf dem
> >Rechner laufen?
> >
> >von mir ben�tigte Funktionen sind:
> >(a) Betrachten von Verzeichnissen auf dem DOS-System (DOS-Befehl DIR)
> >(b) Abrufen von Textdateien vom DOS-System (DOS-Befehl type)
> >(c) L�schen von Dateien vom DOS-System (DOS-Befehl delete)
>
> Ist der Rechner, mit dem Du zugreifen willst (ich sag mal jetzt kurz
> Client dazu) ein DOS-Rechner, k�nntest Du LapLink, PC Anywhere f�r DOS
> bzw. Lap2Desk ausprobieren.
Zur Erl�uterung:
Auf dem DOS-Rechner l�uft eine Telefonanlage als Vordergrundanwendung, die
mir diverse Logfiles schreibt.
Leider sind s�mtliche Interrupts wegen der TK-Anlage schon verbraten, so
da� ich keine Netzwerkkarte einsetzen kann.
Die Logfiles m�ssen von Zeit zu Zeit auf einen Linux-Rechner zur Auswertung
�bertragen werden.
Damit scheinen die L�sungen 'rauszufallen, die eine DOS<->DOS Connectivity
bieten :-(
Die Software unter DOSemu laufen zu lassen w�re sicher elegant, doch kann
man das vergessen; zuviele Hardwaretreiber etc. -- es l�uft nichtmal unter
Windows 3.11...
> Eine weitere M�glichkeit bietet die Installation des Workgroup-Addons,
> wie in einem anderen Posting erw�hnt, f�r DOS. Hier mu� dann
> allerdings NET.EXE gegen eine Version ausgetauscht werden, die
> Filesharing auf dem DOS-Rechner unterst�tzt. Diese Version kennt dann
> die zus�tzlichen Befehle NET START SERVER bzw. NET SHARE .
das schau' ich mir mal n�her an...
Ingo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: intermittant network success
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 03:22:14 GMT
Help!
I have my Linux system up on my TCP/IP network. The system occasionally goes
dead, ie, it will not respond to pings or any network requests. Then
majically it comes back alive. The system is in a remote network location do
I can't get to the console. Any idea what's up with this screwy behavior.
Could it have something to do with my green motherboard shutting down network
services?
Thanks for any help.
Wayne Gregori
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Subject: Re: IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 23:39:29 -0500
Here in comp.os.linux.networking, Wonkoo Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
spake unto us, saying:
>Disabling telnetd is definitely not an option for me, because
>I have to telnet to the Linux box from other PCs in my home LAN.
>(The Linux box has no monitor!)
I just bought a cute little 9" mono VGA monitor for US$10 at a local
computer fair for my firewall box. :-)
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>---> Bloomington, MN
OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris + BeOS +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + MacOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
"Paid off"? What does that mean?"
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Steiner)
Subject: Re: IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 23:38:13 -0500
FfHere in comp.os.linux.networking, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake unto us, saying:
>> Tools that hide the inner workings of the system and don't make anything
>> easier should not be used. Editing a file is just as easy as using a GUI
>> tool, and gives a much better [and more portable] understanding of what's
>> going on. If you want your hand held, use some other OS.
>
>Gee, If this isn't a brainless remark! How will one learn anything w/o
>hand holding!
Besides reading books, using internet information resources, and playing
with things on your own to see what they do? I dunno. :-)
--
-Rich Steiner >>>---> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>---> Bloomington, MN
OS/2 + Linux (Slackware+RedHat+SuSE) + FreeBSD + Solaris + BeOS +
WinNT4 + Win95 + PC/GEOS + MacOS + Executor = PC Hobbyist Heaven!
Life is sexually transmitted, and terminal.
------------------------------
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
From: Ken Cormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 06:38:57 -0400
"Jeff Volckaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>All my hardware (with the exception of my Hauppauge tuner card) works
>flawlessly. Ensonique sound, Riva128 video, 13G seagate drive and ne200=
0
>network included.
Jeff - Got my Hauppauge WinTV Model 401 working just fine here under RedH=
at
6.0 with xawtv-2.43-1.i386.rpm (built from xawtv-2.43.tar.gz, using the
command "rpm -ta xawtv-2.43.tar.gz", also per the xawtv docs). Kradio ev=
en
works well. I can offer a few things to look for, but if needed, I'll as=
k you
to give a few specifics about your configuration.
To start, here's a snippet from my /etc/conf.modules (per the xawtv docs)=
,
relating to the WinTV board....
alias char-major-81 bttv
pre-install bttv modprobe -k msp3400; modprobe -k tuner
options bttv card=3D0 radio=3D1 vidmem=3D0xff0
options tuner type=3D2
Also, here's a look at my /etc/rc.d/rc.modules file (which may not exist =
by
default but is searched for and executed if found during startup)...
/sbin/modprobe tuner
/sbin/modprobe msp3400
/sbin/modprobe bttv
Per the xawtv docs, be CERTAIN to compile kernel bttv support as a module=
!=20
If you normally use "make menuconfig", you'll find the settings under...
Main Menu
Character devices
Video For Linux
<M> Video For Linux
<M> BT848 Video For Linux
Finally, I ran the following to make sure I had the needed device nodes..=
=2E
cd /dev
./MAKEDEV video =20
I hope this info helps.
>DHCP will not work with my Cable modem. My workstations DHCP fine to my
>Linux DHCP server though. This one really hurts and prevents me from
>upgrading my firewall until it's fixed. I'm told that Redhat now uses a
>program called pump instead of dhcpcd.
Regarding the above, I have had no problems with DHCP and my cable modem
(Time-Warner's RoadRunner in Northeast Ohio, while using an Artisoft AE2/=
NE-2000
Clone), yet I DO experience lock-ups (and a spewing of garbage on the LAN=
at the
office) under DHCP with a Compaq-labled Intel EtherExpress 10/100 PCI NIC=
=2E Wierd.
(Solved that issue by simply getting a fixed IP address at the office, th=
ough that doesnt
help you out here - sorry)
Keep us posted, k?
Ken
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Ken Cormack
Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.neo.rr.com/kcormack/
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Villy Kruse)
Subject: Re: diald
Date: 5 May 1999 13:15:48 +0200
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mike Jagdis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>This is not true. Diald buffers packets received on the proxy
>and forwards them when the real link comes up. If you have dynamic
>addresses you need to tell the kernel so via /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr.
>Even so this doesn't work with masquerading and dynamic addresses.
In some cases you are better off dropping the packages instead of buffering
them during the dial process. When an aplication tries to initiate a tcp
connection a syn package will be sent to the interface and buffered. After
a timeout another identical syn is bufferd, and eventualy two or three
identical syn packages are buffered up when the ppp conection is established.
Now all these syn packages are sent end to end, and some tcp implementations
cannot handle this and treat this as an attempt to setup three tcp connection
with the obvious confusion on either side, which are only resolved if the
application closes down and starts with a fresh socket.
This may not be common, but it does happen, and the fix is to drop everything
until the ppp conection is up, and the timout code in the tcp stack will take
care of sending another syn packet.
Villy
------------------------------
From: Rob van der Putten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Direct Cable PPP connection between Linux and Win95
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 13:17:38 +0200
Hi there
On Wed, 5 May 1999, Bono wrote:
> It works fine between win95s but I still can't connect to Linux box.
Did you try 2 Linux boxes?
Regards,
Rob
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| http://www.sput.webster.nl/spam-policy.html |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
------------------------------
From: Kevin Colquitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Apache password authentication
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 03:39:28 GMT
A syntax error in your .htaccess maybe causing the 500 error. Here's a
sample .htaccess I've setup:
AuthUserFile /usr/local/apache/htdocs/passwd/htpasswd
AuthGroupFile /dev/null
AuthName "WAN Services"
AuthType Basic
require user csmwan
I think you may have everything else setup correctly.
Kevin
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Mark wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I can't seem to get Apache to ask me for a password. When I try to go to
> the directory IS_ONLY my browser gives me a 500 Internal Server Error and
> says: need AuthName: /IS_ONLY/
>
> Inside IS_ONLY I have a .htaccess file containing the following:
> <Limit GET>
> require user mark
> </Limit>
>
> "AccessFileName .htaccess" is set in my srm.conf
> "mark" is in my .htpasswd file which is being pointed to by access.conf
> "AllowOverride All is also set.
>
> My question is, do I have to write code to get Apache to give me a password
> dialogue box or should it do that itself? If it should, why isn't it?
>
> Thanks for any help,
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Col" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Col" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: linux box login
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 17:30:04 +0200
Gday people....has anyone got any idea how to make a linux box login
automatically???
-Col
------------------------------
From: Azfar Kazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: connecting two networks w/o a router??
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 06:13:55 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is the scenerio:
I am going to set a Linux box that would be connected to the Internet through
a dedicated dialup. It will have a static [class C] IP address on ppp0
interface. It will be running almost all TCP/IP services including DNS.
This box will be physically a pat of our ethernet that has class B addresses.
My question is that if I make this Linux box DNS resolv mydomain.com to
C-class then ethernet users won't be able to connect. If I make it to resolve
mydomain.com to B-class then, ofcourse, I will be a dead man. As this DNS
server has to be the primary NS for my domain.
My qyestion is that if my ethernet has B-class and Linux box has C, then can I
connect from ethernet clients to Linux box without a router? Can only adding a
couple of routes on Linux solve the problem?
[There is a solution of this that to put another DNS in between that resolves
to Linux box's ethernet address while primary DNS will keep resolving to
actual C-class. But this solution requires an additional box.]
Any clue?
--
Azfar Kazmi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IP masquerading - blocking remote telnet
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 06:15:07 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Wonkoo Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Disabling telnetd is definitely not an option for me, because
> I have to telnet to the Linux box from other PCs in my home LAN.
> (The Linux box has no monitor!)
Well, if you must access the machine remotely, your best bet is to use `sshd`
rather than `telnetd`. It encrypts all of the data sent over the wire, so
even if somebody is packet sniffing you'll be fine. Or you could set Linux
up to use a serial console, and then disable remote logins.
-Bill Clark
Systems Architect
ISP Channel
http://locale.ispchannel.com/
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network failure during heavy traffic
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 06:18:34 GMT
In article <7gogni$fgg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Craig Sanders" <csanders*NOSPAM*@placs.net> wrote:
> Hubs are 10/100 as are NICs on machines in question. Started with a Netgear
> FA310TX (including installation of the provided driver) and changed to
> Realtek. I've given up on it being a hardware problem. Can anyone clue me in
> on what may be configured wrong?
My guess would be that at least one NIC is set to half-duplex, with the others
set to full. There was a thread in here about a week or so ago about that
problem. A quick search on Dejanews in the group, using "duplex" as a search
word should bring it up.
-Bill Clark
Systems Architect
ISP Channel
http://locale.ispchannel.com/
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Wai Fai, Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Help with "route" command
Date: 5 May 1999 06:32:35 GMT
Hello all,
I had to rebuild my system over the weekend and I though I have all
the necessary networking files under /etc backed up but I was mistaken. I
have re-installed Linux 5.2 and I cannot get the 2 ethernet cards on this
one system to ping itself - let alone pinging other computers (I was able
to do IP masquerading before I did the rebuild). I watched the screen as
the system boots and the two network cards were found and the correct MAC
address reported by Linux. I think it has something to do with a file in
/etc/rc.d/rc.inet1(?) which sets up the routing info and got blown away
when I rebuilt the system. I have tried various "route" commands to no
avail. I have included my "ifconfig -a" and "netstat -rn" output. Can
someone show me the right "route" command to use (I did a search on
www.dejanews.com and I did not find something that I could use). Thanks for
your help!.
========================================================================
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
BROADCAST LOOPBACK MTU:3584 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:46:A5:42
inet addr:24.1.239.235 Bcast:24.1.239.255 Mask:255.255.254.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1762 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:17 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:11 Base address:0x6100
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:80:C8:EE:D4:62
inet addr:192.168.125.3 Bcast:192.168.125.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0
Interrupt:3 Base address:0x240
======================================================================
ernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
Iface
192.168.125.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
eth1
24.1.238.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.254.0 U 1500 0 0
eth0
0.0.0.0 24.1.238.1 0.0.0.0 UG 1500 0 0
eth0
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Donald Becker)
Subject: Re: Tulip - Linksys LNE100TX - Etherfast 10/100 LAN Card
Date: 5 May 1999 02:28:15 -0400
In article <7fbd7r$p1m$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Mike Rayborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a Linksys LNE100TX Etherfast 10/100 LAN Card that I can't get to work
>reliably with Linux 2.0.33. I'm using tulip v0.91 4-14-99 with options
>debug=6 I get the following output for PING of another host (Windows 95) on
>same network.
>Apr 17 20:57:07 pegasus kernel: eth0: interrupt csr5=0x02670014 new
>csr5=0x02660010.
...
>Apr 17 20:57:08 pegasus kernel: In tulip_rx(), entry 0 010f0708.
Looks OK to me -- you are sending and receiving packets.
The receive packet had length 271 and was a multicast or broadcast address.
I'm guessing that you have a routing problem, not a driver problem.
--
Donald Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
USRA-CESDIS, Center of Excellence in Space Data and Information Sciences.
Code 930.5, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD. 20771
301-286-0882 http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/people/becker/whoiam.html
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: ox.os.linux
Subject: Re: IP Aliasing problems
Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 07:08:42 -0500
Take a look at http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP/HOWTO/mini/IP-Alias.html
You need to add a route to the host as well.
ifconfig eth0:0 100.0.0.1
route add -host 100.0.0.1 dev eth0:0
Nick Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7gpacv$3q6$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> OK, so what is going wrong here?:
>
> RH5.2 / 2.2.5 kernel
> IP aliasing support compiled into the kernel
> net-tools-1.52
>
> I do:
>
> ifconfig eth0:0 100.0.0.1
>
> which works fine:
>
> eth0:0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:08:74:E8:77
> inet addr:100.0.0.1 Bcast:100.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> Interrupt:9 Base address:0xef00
>
> I think, however, there is something fubar with the routing;
> netstat -nr (snipped appropriately) returns:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> 100.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
>
> which (I think) is wrong; I think the interface should be
> eth0:0 rather than plain eth0.
>
> I can ping other devices on the 100.0.0.0 subnet, but I can't
> seem to get any TCP traffic to them. Telnet times out
> etc. traceroute gives the following:
>
> traceroute: Warning: Multiple interfaces found; using 163.1.145.129 @ eth0
> traceroute to 100.1.0.1 (100.1.0.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
>
> and then just sits there, clearly not working. If I force
> traceroute to use eth0:0 with the -i option, it works:
>
> traceroute to 100.1.0.1 (100.1.0.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets
> 1 100.1.0.1 (100.1.0.1) 7.677 ms 11.814 ms 9.624 ms
>
> Assuming that this is some brokenness with the automatic route
> configuration that ifconfig/something does, I removed the route
> to the 100.0.0.0 network, and set a correct route:
>
> route del -net 100.0.0.0 dev eth0
> route add -net 100.0.0.0 dev eth0:0
>
> Only that changes precisely nothing, and the route still appears
> like its been setup to go via eth0, rather than eth0:0.
>
> Any ideas what is going on here?
>
> It looks like a routing problem, in that the routing table isn't
> accepting an aliased interface, and defaulting to the straight
> eth0 device. Since eth0 then seems to have two addresses, it's
> defaulting to the first.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Nick.
>
> --
>
> [ Nick Williams Office - 01865-(2)79252 ]
> [ Computing Officer Mobile - 07775-637124 ]
> [ New College, Oxford http://www.new.ox.ac.uk/~nick/ ]
------------------------------
From: anthony classick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.development.apps
Subject: Re: PPP over Ethernet
Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 07:13:35 -0400
Why would you need PPP over ethernet, might I ask?
Mattias Wildeman wrote:
>
> Is there anyone out there who is working on a PPP over Ethernet client
> for Linux?
>
> /Matt
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
