Linux-Networking Digest #63, Volume #11 Thu, 6 May 99 21:13:44 EDT
Contents:
Re: Help: How to set up a POP server on my linux
Re: SSH2 & Firewalls Questions ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: Help: NFS mount ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
TokenRing.patch-1.2.0 (Jeff Haney)
Re: serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner? (Gerd Roethig)
Re: Mapping Win98 drive letters to Linux server? ("Jeff Howard")
Re: PPP problems with RH6.0 (Robert Gadsdon)
Upgrade to redhat 6 (David Kennedy)
Re: kernel 2.2 (Bill Unruh)
Re: no pingies in very simple network (M. Buchenrieder)
Re: IPX routing over ppp ("Bill")
IPChains in RedHat 6.0 (Francois Magnan)
Re: Official vs CheapBytes RH Linux (Kwan Lowe)
Re: pcanywhere equivalent for linux (Kwan Lowe)
Re: Routing non-routable address ("Curt")
Re: Best Free X Windows Server for Win95/98 Box on Samba/Linux Network? (Ursa_M)
Re: PPP excessive logging (Christopher Mahmood)
Re: Where can I find /usr/sbin/chat sources ? (Christopher Mahmood)
Re: pcanywhere equivalent for linux (Christopher Mahmood)
Re: Setting Linux up to pass thru Wingate proxy (Christopher Mahmood)
Re: recommend ethernet card (Christopher Mahmood)
Re: EtherExpress 16 Support in Linux? (Christopher Mahmood)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ()
Subject: Re: Help: How to set up a POP server on my linux
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 19:06:00 GMT
On Thu, 06 May 1999 18:30:07 GMT, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Help: How to set up a POP server on my linux
>
>All help greatly appreciated
>
Install the "imap" package on a recent version of Linux. Consider installing
"sslwrap" available from various web sites near you in order to encrypt the
transmission of passwords for Netscape and other more sophisticated clients.
And consider using IMAP instead of POP, for various reasons.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.security.ssh,comp.security.unix,comp.security.firewalls
Subject: Re: SSH2 & Firewalls Questions
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 18:59:48 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Suppose I have three hosts:
> >
> > INTERNALHOST <==> FIREWALL <==> EXTERNALHOST
> > (Intranet) (Internet)
> > "fake" IP Real IP addrs
> > 192.168.1.X net
> >
> > From EXTERNALHOST, I can ssh2 into FIREWALL and then rsh, rlogin or telnet
> > into INTERNALHOST ("fake" IP addr, 192.161.1.x subnet). From INTERNALHOST,
I
> > can ssh2 directly to EXTERNALHOST (real IP addr).
>
> Yes, assuming you masquerade your intrnal net.
Yep. We do that.
> > What I'd like to be able to do: -ssh2 directly from EXTERNALHOST to
> > INTERNALHOST in a secure manner without involving any rlogin or rsh from
> > FIREWALL. I do NOT want to create accounts for people on FIREWALL (maybe
> > account, if necessary).
>
> * Again, use ipfwadm on firewall to redirect a port (ie. 22) on the outside
> machine on the inside
Do you mean redirect external connections to FIREWALL's port 22 to
INTERNALHOST port 22?
What about traffic from the internal, masqueraded subnet to the outside world?
I'm guessing that I should NOT port forward those.
Hmm...
I'll have to do a little experimentation with this.
Thanks.
-Ralph
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help: NFS mount
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 19:08:02 GMT
Yep. Anything that is run by RPC uses the portmapper to get a port to listen
on. So, the 'portmap' daemon must be running and your hosts.allow file must
allow the clients access to the portmap daemon.
example hosts.allow entry:
portmap: 201.34.
This will allow all machines with an IP address beginning with 201.34. to
access the portmapper. Or, you can use ALL: 201.34. but that is overkill if
you just want to give portmap privileges to the network.
Bob
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Frisch) wrote:
> On Wed, 5 May 1999 10:15:22 -0700, M. Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >3/ Check mountd and nfsd run on both hosts
> >root 499 0.0 0.4 1084 612 ? S 19:43 0:00 rpc.mountd
> >root 508 0.0 0.4 1092 616 ? S 19:43 0:00 rpc.nfsd
> >
> >4/ /etc/rc.d/init.d/nfs stop/start or reboot
>
> I presume you have the portmapper running as well? I think rpc.mountd
> and/or rpc.nfsd require it, but I am not 100% sure.
>
> Mike.
>
> --
> ======================================================================
> Mike Frisch Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Northstar Technologies WWW: http://saturn.tlug.org/~mfrisch
> Newmarket, Ontario, CANADA
> ======================================================================
>
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Jeff Haney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TokenRing.patch-1.2.0
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 14:26:39 -0500
I'm trying to get an IBM Turbo 16/4 PC Card working with Red Hat 5.2. I
found documentation that says it can be done but requires a patch,
TokenRing.patch-1.2.0 and was hoping somebody could send it to me or
point me to a location where I could get it. Also any advice you have
in getting this working. Thanks.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gerd Roethig)
Crossposted-To: de.comp.os.msdos,de.comm.software.misc,de.comp.os.unix.networking
Subject: Re: serieller Remotezugriff auf DOS-Rechner?
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 19:16:26 GMT
Hallo Ingo, hallo alle,
Am Wed, 05 May 1999 16:41:20 +0200 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Ingo Ciechowski) :
>Hallo zusammen,
>
>ich habe jetzt diesen Microsoft TCP/IP Stack auf meiner DOSe mit der
>TK-Analage installiert und den Interrupt vom Centronics-Port f�r 'ne NE2000
>Netwerkkarte hergenommen.
>
>Ping auf die Kiste klappt ;-) -- nur leider brauchen diese ganzen Programme
>zuviel Speicher bzw. lassen sich nicht mittels "lh" ins upper Memory
>laden...
>
>Insbesondere das Programm "net" ist zu gro�; d.h. ich kann die
>Vordergrundanwendung der TK-Anlage nicht mehr laden, wenn die
>Netzverbindung mittels "net start" aufgebaut wird.
>
>Gibt's nicht einen FTP- oder Telnet-Daemon f�r DOS, der im Hintergrund
>gestartet werden kann?
Das gleiche Problem bekommt wohl erst mal jeder, der diesen (gelinde
gesagt, etwas krausen) MS-TCP/IP-Stack installiert. Leider scheint es
keine Alternativen dazu zu geben, deshalb habe ich zum Bleistift einen
halben Tag herumgedoktert, um das Ganze in den hohen Speicher zu
bekommen.
Herausgekommen ist dabei folgende Konfig
CONFIG.SYS:
DEVICE=C:\WINDOWS\HIMEM.SYS /testmem:off
DEVICE=C:\DOS\EMM386.EXE NOEMS NOVCPI I=B000-B7FF I=C800-F7FF
buffers=30,0
FILES=40
stacks=9,256
DOS=HIGH,UMB
LASTDRIVE=Z
FCBS=4,0
INSTALL=c:\ut\memstrat\memstrat.exe 4
DEVICE=C:\UT\DOSMAX\DOSMAX.EXE /c+ /p-
DEVICEHIGH /L:1 =C:\DOS\KEYBGR.SYS
shell=c:\ut\dosmax\shellmax.com c:\command.com /p
AUTOEXEC.BAT:
@ECHO OFF
REM *** DOS-TCP/IP-Stack laden ***
LH /L:2 C:\NET\NET INITIALIZE
C:\NET\netbind.com
LH /L:1 C:\NET\umb.com
LH /L:2 C:\NET\tcptsr.exe
LH C:\NET\tinyrfc.exe
LH C:\NET\nmtsr.exe
C:\NET\emsbfr.exe
C:\NET\net start
LH /L:2 C:\WINDOWS\SMARTDRV.EXE /L 4096 0
PROMPT $P$G
PATH c:\;C:\NET;C:\DOS
SET TEMP=C:\TEMP
c:\mouse\ctmouse /r55
c:\ut\memstrat\memstrat 1
Das Ganze geschah mit folgender Software:
memstrat.zip und dosmax.zip (zu bekommen von jedem SimTel-Mirror unter
DOS/MEMUTIL)
ctmouse als kleinster mir bekannter Maustreiber
(http://ftpsearch.lycos.com nach ctmouse.zip fragen)
Kebgr als kleinster mir bekannter deutscher Tastaturtreiber (leider
keine Bezugsquelle, ist mir wahrscheinlich mal durch offene Fenster
zugeflogen) oder rekeyb.sys (war mal bei
http://www.junior-net.de/~areiland/ , ist aber dort nicht mehr zu
finden, am besten Mail an Alex Reiland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
Wichtig ist hierbei wenigstens ein gro�er durchgehend mit "UMBs"
belegbarer Speicherbereich (herauszufinden mit MSD.EXE, "Memory", hier
bekommt man auch den nutzbaren Bereich f�r das I= Statement bei EMM386
(als "available") angezeigt).
Wobei gilt: der erste Speicherbereich (bei mir B000-B7FF) hat die
Nummer 1, der zweite (C800-F7FF) die Nummer 2. Man kann nun den
LH-Befehl mit Angabe von /L:Nummer dazu zwingen, Treiber in einen
bestimmten Bereich zu laden. Logischerweise kommen dann all die
kleinen Treiber bei mir in Bereich 1, die gro�en Brocken nach 2.
Mit der Zeit macht solches Gefummel richtig Spa� - wohl einer der
Gr�nde f�r den Riesenerfolg von MS-DOS :->
Ciao
Gerd
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mapping Win98 drive letters to Linux server?
Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 14:36:41 -0500
Dave,
AFAIK, there are a couple of ways to do this. There are a few utils out
there for making linux appear as a netware server (mars-nwe? Any other
suggestions?). I have to admit that I'm not that familiar with the netware
stuff out there for linux. Another way to accomplish what you are
describing is to use samba (www.samba.org) on the linux machine, effectively
turning it into a windows file server (If such a thing could truly be said
to exist). This would require you to add the client for microsoft networks
and tcp/ip to the win9x machines. The client for MS networks should be able
to coexist with the existing Netware client. Samba runs over tcp/ip so if
your network is currently ipx you'll have to do some pretty involved
configuring. Nothing that couldn't be fixed easily with dhcpd though.
If your network is very large, you'll probably be better off making the
linux box into a netware equivalent. I wish I could be of more help on that
topic. I do seem to remember hearing a bit about some work caldera was
doing with Novell to integrate netware support into linux. I know they have
a working netware client for linux and an implementation of a netware server
that runs on linux. You might want to see if you can find anything useful at
their site (www.caldera.com)
Hope this helped,
Jeff
Dave Ewart wrote in message <7gs160$atk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I have a network of PCs running Windows 98 - we have a handful of Netware
>3.12 servers.
>
>I have successfully configured a Linux (RedHat 5.2) server to be able to
>"see" the files on the Netware servers, using the IPX setup in LinuxConf
and
>the command "ncpmount". This works fine.
>
>What I would like to do, however, is to map a drive letter on the Windows
98
>workstations to a specified point on the Linux box. How do I do that? Is
>it possible? [The workstations are using the Novell Netware Client 3.10 to
>access the Netware servers.]
>
>Thanks for any tips,
>
>Dave.
>--
>Dave Ewart, Computing Manager
>Imperial Cancer Research Fund (Cancer Epidemiology Unit), Oxford
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Robert Gadsdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: Re: PPP problems with RH6.0
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 12:41:21 -0700
Yes, "dns" is in the 'correct' place in nsswitch.conf. I will see if
anything changes when I disable ypbind (if possible)..
Robert Gadsdon
'
Barry Keeney wrote:
>
> did you check your nsswitch.conf file to make sure "dns" is
> on the hosts line?
>
> Robert Gadsdon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> : I have been experiencing bizarre PPP problems ever since installing
> : 'starbuck' (RH5.9) and now have the same problem with RH6.0..
>
> snip..........
>
> : I am rapidly running out of ideas here, and any suggestions would be
> : very welcome!
>
> : Robert Gadsdon
> : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> Barry Keeney
> Chaos Consulting
> email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Kennedy)
Subject: Upgrade to redhat 6
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 19:56:44 GMT
I am considering using the "upgrade" rather the "install"
to upgrade my RH 5.2 to RH6.0. Anyone tried it?
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: kernel 2.2
Date: 6 May 1999 23:11:36 GMT
In <01be97dc$29bcf040$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Monica" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>How can I upgrade a kernel 2.0.32 Red hat to a kernel 2.2? I have a CD with
>this kernel but I dont't know what I must do.
>Thanks in advance,
If you like experimenting and figuring out why various things do not
work, just follow for example the kernel HOWTO and install the new
kernel. Many things will break. You then have the fun of figuring out
how to fix them or how to find fixes.
Alternatively, you go out and buy another CD which contains one of the
distributions which has the 2.2 kernle (eg RedHat 6.0) for $2 from a
place like cheapbytes.
Snce your version is using the 2.0.32 kernel it is an older version of
RedHat and is definitely not ready for the 2.2 kernels. This may be
regarded as simply further opportunity for fun in fixing the many many
things which will not work.
Or it could be regarded as an ideal opportunity to upgrade the whole
system.
It is your choice.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: no pingies in very simple network
Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 11:59:49 GMT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>In article <7gremp$6r4$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Kernel IP routing table
>> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
>> Iface
>> 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 1
>> eth0
>> localhost * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 5
>Woah... that's not right.
>It's supposed to have an IP or MAC address in the "Gateway" field, not '*'.
No. You'd only have an IP address in the Gateway field if you needed
to go through a gateway. A simply 2-machines network doesn't need
a gateway to get a Ping through.
>Add in the routes like this:
>`route add default 192.168.0.1`
[...]
Smart move. That would automatically stop any dialup PPP connection
from working (unless the "default" option was used for pppd).
What needs to be checked is
a) that the cards are configured to be using the correct port
(i.e. if the NICs in question do have both RJ-45 and BNC ports,
then they need to be configured with the card's DOS setup program
to be listening to the correct port ; autosensing doesn't work
well) ;
b) whether both Linux systems do agree on the network layout or not;
c) that your two Linux boxes aren't configured as two separate firewalls,
otherwise they'll block themselves.
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: "Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPX routing over ppp
Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 19:53:49 -0400
Michael,
IPX protocol isn't routable, that is why your not getting anywhere.
What version of Novell do you have? The best thing to do is see if you can
set the novel to run TCP/IP don't know if it can be done on Novell haven't
worked with it since 96. Hope this helps.
Bill MacWilliams
------------------------------
Subject: IPChains in RedHat 6.0
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Francois Magnan)
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 20:27:17 GMT
Hi,
I have RedHat 5.2 installed on my 486 router. I would like to use
ipchains to forward the X windows ports to internal machines so I can
run X apps on external machines and be able to display on an internal
machine.
I don't have enough hard-disk space to install a c compiler to
recompile a new kernel version but I installed the kernel2.2.5-15 rpm
and edited /etc/lilo.conf to make lilo boot the new kernel.
When I try to run ipchains I get an error message:
ipchains: Incompatible with this kernel
What did I do wrong?
Thank you,
Francois Magnan
--
______________________________________________________
Francois Magnan
Departement de Mathematique & Statistiques
Universite de Montreal
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MIME, NeXTMail Ok!)
------------------------------
From: Kwan Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Official vs CheapBytes RH Linux
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 07:52:59 -0400
The RedHat version comes with the boot floppy, a manual, a nice bumber
sticker, and the support. Also, the official version has a second disk
with some non-free stuff.
Ian Lunam wrote:
>
> What's the diff ?
>
> I presume the CheapBytes RH 6.0 won't come with the free support that the
> official version comes with, but other than that, what is the diff ??
>
> Ian
------------------------------
From: Kwan Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: pcanywhere equivalent for linux
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 07:58:45 -0400
Virtual Network Computing.
You can control just about any machine from any other. For example, I
can run a VNC Viewer on my Linux machine and control a Mac, Windows
(95/NT) or another Linux box. Or any combination (Windows viewing
Linux, or Mac viewing Windows, etc).
"K.A. Steensma" wrote:
>
> What does 'VNC' mean?
>
> Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Does anyone know of a s/w equivalent of pcanywhere for linux? I'd *really*
> > > like control my NT workstations without having to reboot into win 95 (barf,
> > > hurl) each time i want to do this. Any pointers greatly appreciated.
> >
> > VNC
> >
> > Greetings
> > Bernd
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Routing non-routable address
Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 19:57:01 -0500
You cannot route 192.168.x.x addresses out on the internet. This is not a
linux limitation but a internet standard. However, you can route them
within a private network. Even if the private network has segments that are
internet routable.
If your gateway to the internet does not block the 192.168.x.x traffic it
would probably just be dropped by the next router.
Bob Eckhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Im trying to set up a linux box with to network cards, what I want to do
> is allow linux to go ahead
> and route the 192.168.XX non routable addresses to a routable address
> network on the second interface.
> If I do network address translation it will work, or use routable
> addresses it works but I don't want that right now.
> Is this a limitation with linux or am I missing something. As it stands
> right now the 192 addresses cant get past the linux box
> without translation. HELP
>
------------------------------
From: Ursa_M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.x,alt.os.linux,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Best Free X Windows Server for Win95/98 Box on Samba/Linux Network?
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 20:19:39 -0400
> Timothy Litwiller wrote:
>
> > yes, please send an URL
> >
> > Eugene VonNiederhausern wrote:
> >
> > > Cyrus Mehta wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I am creating a dual Windows/Linux environment using Samba for file serving
> > > > on a standard Ethernet network. I was wondering what kind of X server software
> > > > for the Windows side I could use to run some X windows apps off of the LInux
>Box.
> > > >
> > > > Reliability is the most important factor, windows will crash often enough
>without
> > > > the help of the X server.
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > CKM
> > >
> > > Yesterday, I found the best X server/viewer for windows (and linux) that I have
> > > seen yet and it is free (GNU Public License). It is called VNC from Olivetti and
> > > Oracle research laboratory. You can connect from linux->windows, windows->linux,
> > > linux->linux, windows->windows. It is a lot better than any of the other products
> > > I have seen ot this kind. I don't have the URL (it is at work) you can email
>me or
> > > post a reply and I will get it and reply.
>
> The URL is http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/ . Let me know what you think...
Ursa_M --> I am also using the VNC server and find it to be very reliable and
generally
excellent. The install was easy. I tend to launch and kill the server from a
hyperterminal
window via telnet and then sign onto the VNC X windows. VNC is persistent. Unless
you kill
the session, the next time you login you will be EXACTLY where you were when you
closed the
window. Server sessions can be conveniently killed from a command line, telnet or
direct,
to keep that from being a problem. On the other hand, if you had multiple devices
going and
wanted to keep an X windows session up while you moved from device to device then this
is a
"feature" you would like. Personally, I haven't had a use for that yet so just kill
the
session before I shut down my Win98 machine. VNC has never caused a hiccup on either
the
Win98 or Linux side and is a very thin client on the Win98 side.
Take care,
Ursa_M
------------------------------
From: Christopher Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP excessive logging
Date: 06 May 1999 04:29:33 -0700
looks like kdebug is set. look in your ppp options file (usually
/etc/ppp/options) and remove the kdebug and debug lines.
-ckm
------------------------------
From: Christopher Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Where can I find /usr/sbin/chat sources ?
Date: 06 May 1999 04:35:21 -0700
FX <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First, is it allowed ? And then, where can I find the source code ?
of course, as long as the GPL is maintained if you distribute it.
Chat come in the ppp package usually.
-ckm
------------------------------
From: Christopher Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: pcanywhere equivalent for linux
Date: 06 May 1999 04:42:29 -0700
there's a backorifice client for unix and linux...look on rootshell.org
-ckm
------------------------------
From: Christopher Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Setting Linux up to pass thru Wingate proxy
Date: 06 May 1999 04:27:52 -0700
see the IP-Masquerade mini-howto, it walks you through the entire
process.
-ckm
------------------------------
From: Christopher Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: recommend ethernet card
Date: 06 May 1999 04:43:23 -0700
it seems like all of the beowolf clusters use tulip cards, but I really
don't know.
-ckm
------------------------------
From: Christopher Mahmood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: EtherExpress 16 Support in Linux?
Date: 06 May 1999 04:41:18 -0700
yes, that's what i use. You have to select 'Other ISA cards', then
'EtherExpress'.
If you compile it as a module, you'll probably need an alias like
'alias eth0 eexpress' in conf.modules (or where your
distro. puts them)
-ckm
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
