Linux-Networking Digest #80, Volume #11 Sat, 8 May 99 09:13:47 EDT
Contents:
Re: Get client machine's IP-address (Horst von Brand)
Re: Newbie Seeks Ethernet Help (Jason Bond)
ppp compression problem (Brian Modra)
Re: diald works only once after linux box booting (Frank Hahn)
fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail (Phil Hunt)
Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail (Paul Black)
Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail (Anthony Campbell)
Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail (Mark Evans)
Re: @HOME Cable Service and Linux ("Alan Sims")
Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly (Eric Lee Green)
Re: can't locate module eth1 ("William R. Mattil")
network init on linux? ("Norman E.Morin")
NIS ("Roberto P.Martins Jr.")
Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail (mist)
mgetty blocks dialout (Darren McClelland)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Horst von Brand)
Crossposted-To:
it.comp.linux.development,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.programming,comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains,comp.unix.programmer,comp.unix.sco.programmer
Subject: Re: Get client machine's IP-address
Date: 8 May 1999 09:17:11 GMT
On Wed, 05 May 1999 16:56:17 +0200, Iond Research Srl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does anybody know how can I get in a stand-alone C/C++ program, running on
>a server machine but started during a telnet/rlogin session, the IP-address
>of the client machine that launched the telnet session ?
Impossible to know, as there is nothing that points back in this case.
--
Horst von Brand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Casilla 9G, Vi�a del Mar, Chile +56 32 672616
------------------------------
From: Jason Bond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Newbie Seeks Ethernet Help
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 19:52:23 -0700
Jason Bond wrote:
> Ok...So I've got my Linux machine to ping itself...that is, I've set
> it's ip address as 192.168.1.2 (the win98 which I want to connect it to
> can ping itself at 192.168.1.1).
> One problem is that I can't seem to find ifconfig....
>
> (root@blah: /home/jbond) ifconfig
> bash: ifconfig: command not found
>
> From netstat I get:
>
> (root@blah: /home/jbond) netstat -rn
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt
> Iface
> 207.217.95.11 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1524 0 0
> ppp0
> 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0
> lo
> 0.0.0.0 207.217.95.11 0.0.0.0 UG 1524 0 0
> ppp0
>
> which is interesting because in netcfg it says that eth0 is at
> 192.168.1.2
>
> I also seem to to be able to find route:
>
> (root@blah: /home/jbond) route
> bash: route: command not found
>
> For the io ports and interrupts I get:
>
> (root@blah: /home/jbond) cat /proc/ioports
> e400-e47f : eth0
>
> and
>
> (root@blah: /home/jbond) cat /proc/interrupts
> 5: 15037 eth0
>
> Finally:
>
> (root@blah: /home/jbond) cat /etc/sysconfig/network
> NETWORKING=yes
> FORWARD_IPV4=no
> HOSTNAME=blah.blah
> GATEWAYDEV=
> GATEWAY=
>
> and
>
> (root@blah: /home/jbond) cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
> DEVICE=eth0
> USERCTL=yes
> ONBOOT=yes
> BOOTPROTO=none
> BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
> NETWORK=192.168.1.0
> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> IPADDR=192.168.1.2
>
> again, I am extremely grateful for any help anyone has to
> give. Thanks much again,
>
> Jason
Ok...will try to change the interrupts...but wouldn't an IRQ conflict stop
the ethernet card from being able to ping itself?....just a
thought...thanks again,
Jason
------------------------------
From: Brian Modra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.protocols.ppp
Subject: ppp compression problem
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 13:12:25 +0300
Hi,
I'm having trouble negotiating ppp with an ISP. My Linux system is
trying to be the client.
Here's the relevant part of the debuging info:
sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 <deflate 15> <deflate(old#) 15> <bsd v1 15>]
rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <compress VJ 0f 01> <addr 195.197.0.195>]
sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0x1 <compress VJ 0f 01> <addr 195.197.0.195>]
... so at this point the local IP address has been negotiated
successfuly ...
... then the ISP sent a compression request which the local ppd rejected
rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 11 06 00 01 01 03>]
sent [CCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 11 06 00 01 01 03>]
rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x1 <addr 195.197.4.251>]
... it seems that the ISP then said "well in that case I don't like your
address either ...
... and so the local ppd requested the address again
sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr 195.197.4.251> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
rcvd [CCP ConfRej id=0x1 <deflate 15> <deflate(old#) 15> <bsd v1 15>]
sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x2]
rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x2 <addr 195.197.4.251> <compress VJ 0f 01>]
... but it seems that the ISP got really stubborn.
sent [IPCP TermReq id=0x3 "Interface configuration failed"]
..............................
The problem seems to be the
rcvd [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 11 06 00 01 01 03>]
... which was rejected by my local pppd.
What should I do?
I'm using ppp 2.3.3 on kernel 2.1.109 with kernel modules activated.
The ppp modules and compression modules are loaded in the correct order.
--
B&J Modra Ph: +358-50-359 2389 FAX: +358-3-318 5775
Insin��rinkatu 58 C 18, 33720 Tampere, Finland
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Hahn)
Subject: Re: diald works only once after linux box booting
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 02:58:59 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 06 May 1999 22:50:12 GMT, Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have a linux box, with red hat 5.1, kernel 2.0.35, pppd 2.3.3.,diald
> 0.16.4.1 I can use my connection script for pppd to connect to my
>ISP. And I also can use diald to dial on demand for web browsing from
>win95, I have setup a network in my home ,one is linux box ,other is
>Win95, but the diald works only once after linux box booting. After I
>close the netscape in win95 after the first web browsing. The diald
>will off line automatically, and then I re-open the netscape, I found
>the diald can dial to my ISP again ,but it can't get the ppp
>connection. The web browsing is failed. The diald re-connect have the
>same problem that fixed by reboot the linux.
>I really don't know what is happy in it.
>
Is the modem getting reset to a proper state after each call. You
say that it works once after a reboot and then won't connect. Make
sure that you are using a proper initialization string.
Also, there is a version of 0.16.5 of diald. I would get it and try
that. I know a couple of later versions have come out within the
last few months but I could not get them to compile on my Slackware
system with a 2.0.36 kernel.
--
Frank Hahn
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Hunt)
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux,demon.ip.support.unix
Subject: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail
Date: Sat, 08 May 99 10:32:28 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have experience downloading email from the demon POP3
mailserver?
When I do it, using fetchmail, its does download email; however
unfortunately sendmail is running as well and some of the messages get
downloaded by SMTP -- Demon recognises this and sends an email telling
me.
I've tried not running sendmail, but this is no good because it causes
fetchmail to stop working too (fetchmail tries to deliver its mail to
sendmail). There's nothing in the Demon section of the fetchmail FAQ,
either.
I'm running SuSE6.0, if that's any help.
--
Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Paul Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux,demon.ip.support.unix
Subject: Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 12:03:32 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Hunt) wrote:
>
> Does anyone have experience downloading email from the demon POP3
> mailserver?
>
> When I do it, using fetchmail, its does download email; however
> unfortunately sendmail is running as well and some of the messages get
> downloaded by SMTP -- Demon recognises this and sends an email telling
> me.
>
> I've tried not running sendmail, but this is no good because it causes
> fetchmail to stop working too (fetchmail tries to deliver its mail to
> sendmail). There's nothing in the Demon section of the fetchmail FAQ,
> either.
>
> I'm running SuSE6.0, if that's any help.
If SMTP is working, why worry about using POP3?
You will need to prevent sendmail from getting the mail from Demon.
Sendmail can use TCP wrappers to control connections, not done it so
I can't help you. The Linux firewall can be used to prevent connections
from external machines (you are running a firewall, aren't you?).
Paul
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anthony Campbell)
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux,demon.ip.support.unix
Subject: Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 12:08:21 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 08 May 99 10:32:28 GMT, Phil Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Does anyone have experience downloading email from the demon POP3
>mailserver?
>
>When I do it, using fetchmail, its does download email; however
>unfortunately sendmail is running as well and some of the messages get
>downloaded by SMTP -- Demon recognises this and sends an email telling
>me.
>
>I've tried not running sendmail, but this is no good because it causes
>fetchmail to stop working too (fetchmail tries to deliver its mail to
>sendmail). There's nothing in the Demon section of the fetchmail FAQ,
>either.
>
>I'm running SuSE6.0, if that's any help.
>
>
>--
>Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I find the same thing, but I use fetchmail only when the punts are refusing
to disgorge. In that case I don't get the emails from demon, although they
don't do any harm in any case; you just delete them.
Anthony
--
Anthony Campbell - running Linux Debian 2.1 (Windows-free zone)
Book Reviews: www.achc.demon.co.uk/bookreviews/
"The Moving Finger writes; and, having writ,
Moves on..." - Edward Fitzgerald (Rubaiat of Omar Khayyam)
------------------------------
From: Mark Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux,demon.ip.support.unix
Subject: Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 12:10:08 +0100
Phil Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have experience downloading email from the demon POP3
> mailserver?
> When I do it, using fetchmail, its does download email; however
> unfortunately sendmail is running as well and some of the messages get
> downloaded by SMTP -- Demon recognises this and sends an email telling
> me.
Two choices
1) Have sendmail only accept connections from 127.0.0.1. e.g. using
ipfwadm/ipchains.
2) There is an option to turn of SMTP delivery on the configuation
webpage
------------------------------
From: "Alan Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: @HOME Cable Service and Linux
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 08:05:27 GMT
Hi Scott. I'm trying to do the same thing, but haven't had any success yet.
I know it's possible because I found a guy,(through ICQ), in texas who has
it working. He couldn't help me much though. He has it running as a static
IP. I also read a couple of things at http://www.linuxhardware.net . I f you
figure any thing out please post it here & i will do likewise. :-)
Scott Robson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi
>
> Im curious if anyone has had any experience using linux with the @HOME
> cable modem service (www.home.com).
>
> I know they do not support it, but is it possible to connect anyway and
> do they fire wall? static or dynamic ip? Is the general performance of
> the line good or bad?
>
> I'd plan to run a web server and maybe a mail server over it (for
> completely personal use of course). Anyone have any experience with them?
>
> Thanx in Advance
>
> Scott
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Lee Green)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly
Date: 8 May 1999 12:20:32 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 04 May 1999 10:10:29 -0700, Victoria Welch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sound for the SB PCI128 *again* didn't work. sndconfig gets to the
>point where
>it wants to play a test sound and hangs (same as 5.0, 5.1, 5.2 and 5.9).
I suggest using the ALSA (Advanced Linux Sound Architecture) drivers.
Your SB 128 will only barely work with the included OSS/LITE drivers in
the first place (I find that the DMA keeps getting messed up and the
sound that's playing suddenly turns into scratches and hisses).
Try http://www.alsa-project.org . Works great with my ESS1371-based card!
--
Eric Lee Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.tripod.com/~e_l_green
One database programmer/system administrator for hire, see web site above
------------------------------
From: "William R. Mattil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can't locate module eth1
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 18:46:07 -0500
A Guy Called Tyketto wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jim LaSalle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I am still trying to get RH 5.2 Linux to recognize a second NIC.
> >
> > I added append = "ether=0,0,eth1" to lilo.conf and ran lilo
> >
> > When I reboot these messages appear:
> > modprobe: can't locate module eth1
> > Delaying eth1 initialization
> >
If are trying to use modules, as opossed to compiling support into the kernel
itself then
this is incorrect.
You cannot pass options to a module using LILO. Period.
This misinformation seems to propegated here quite regularly. If you are using
modules
you need to make the appropriate entry in /etc/conf.modules. For example:
===========/etc/conf.modules=================
alias eth0 3c503
options 3c503 0x300,5
========================================
>
> > Do I have to recompile? Both cards are the same NE-2000 compatible
> > cards. One is set to 0x300, IRQ10 the other to 0x320, IRQ5. These
> > resourses have no conflicts. The only difference is one card's
> > tranceiver is setup for 10baseT the other for 10base2. The eth0
> > device works fine. It can see and be seen by the network.
> >
> > I have not progressed to the point where I can assign an IP to the
> > second NIC
alias eth0 ne
alias eth1 ne
options ne 0x300,0x320,10,5
This is from memory but should be close. I also seem to recall that there were
probablems using two ne2000's. I have never used two ne2000's. But this does
work using 3c503, 3c509's etc etc. The BNC port can also be selected this way
as well by using two additional args. 0=TP 1=BNC . IIRC
>
>
> So, your append message should look like this:
>
> append = "ether5,0x320,ne"
>
> That was from the LILO Howto, and somewhere lost in the SCSI
> Howto. Your append line in the lilo.conf is fine, but you're passing the
> wrong options. the 'ether' option should take in the IRQ, address, then
> the name of the module. you said before you had eth0 and eth1 aliased to
> ne in your modules.conf, which is cool, but you need to pass the options
> to the NIC, to lilo as well, at boot time. Give that a try, and see what
> happens.
Now if support is compiled into the kernel for ne2000's then this append =
stuff will work.
Regards
Bill
--
William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ginger had to do it all backwards
(972) 399-4106 | and... in high heels.
------------------------------
From: "Norman E.Morin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: network init on linux?
Date: Sat, 08 May 1999 08:27:52 -0400
hello,
I have a linux box (p133, 16m memory, 2-3c503 nics, kernel 2.0.34)
that I am using for a firewall/nat and connecting between
a home lan and mediaone.
I have noticed some strange initializationbehavior that I'd like to
confirm with other users.
Sometimes the ethernet cards/routing is not configured correctly.
It used to be that the nic card that was connected to mediaone
did not always configure properly. I noticed that "ifconfig"
did not always display the missing nic. I usually enter
"route add ..." and the card shows up and routing works.
The command is in the .../rc.inet1 file but sometimes it
seems that the command does not get executed properly.
The rc.inet1 file does have the command to invoke the dhcp client
before the ifconfig or route commands.
I installed a "sleep 10" command to make sure that the
dhcp command was started and executing before the ifconfig
and routing commands. That seems to have allowed the mediaone
connection to be reliable.
Then I noticed that the home lan nic is not always ifconfiged to the
linux box. Executing the "ifconfig ...." command that is in the
rc.inet1 file usually corrects the problem.
Is there some proper order or timing of commands that must be
observed when using dhcp? Is this a situation that is
common knowledge when using 2 nics?
I have the impression/feeling that the linux networking is not reliable.
I don't really believe this impression as so many folks
are successfully using linux to satisfy all sorts of network
requirements.
Does anyone have the same experience.
I hoped to have a "headless" linux box be my firewall that is
turned on when the cable modem is powered up. Obviously
I would telnet and halt the linux box before removing power.
Since the net is not alway reliably initialized, I have a terminal
connected to verify that both nics and routing is running correctly.
I have noted that once things run correctly, they are up to stay.
I would like to eliminate the questionable initialization.
Any hints or pointers.
regards
Norm Morin
------------------------------
From: "Roberto P.Martins Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: NIS
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 23:40:10 -0300
Hi!
I have NIS running on my server and every time I have to add someone in
the system I use useradd and them run make inside /var/yp to update
NIS.
Is there any other way to tell NIS to create the account without running
make. Is it possible to run some "nisuseradd" on any machine on the
network and have my server user account database updated? Is there any
protocol or library?
Thanks!
--
Roberto P.Martins Jr.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Lab/9636
ICQ #12393737
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: uk.comp.os.linux,demon.ip.support.unix
Subject: Re: fetchmail works -- but so does sendmail
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 13:34:57 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alan Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
<snip>
>
>Another solution would be to disable access from Demon's machines to sendmail.
>I don't use sendmail myself (I use exim), but I imagine that you can tell it
>in one of the config files not to accept connections from *anything* in the
>outside world (it shouldn't be configured to allow anything outside the
>194.217.242 subnet anyway, apart from your local machine or network).
Yup, the problem I see with trying that is that the mail coming in via
SMTP would be rejected and sent back to the sender. That is, you lose
the mail.
Easier just to firewall it off I should imagine. Something like
/sbin/ipchains -A input -J DENY -p tcp -s 194.217.242.0/255.255.255.0
-d your.dotted.ip.addy 25
should do it.
>
>Finally, why not just use SMTP delivery anyway? It's so much easier.
>
True. 8-)
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: Darren McClelland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mgetty blocks dialout
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 04:42:45 +0000
Hi
I am setting up a Linux box with dialin remote access and and a dial out
PPP connection. The idea is to dial in to the box, hang up and then have
it dial me back to a PPP server. This to provide some security and so
that the long distance charges live at the remote box. I can dial in
just fine and get a terminal and login, and I can dial out and establish
a PPP connection, _but_ not both. When mgetty is running the dialout
chat script never seems to talk to the modem and just hangs. Here's the
setup:
RH 5.1
2.0.34 kernel
Mgetty
S2:2345:respawn:/sbin/mgetty ttyS2 -D /dev/ttyS2l
in inittab to start the mgetty
mgetty.config:
speed 38400
debug 8
Chat:
/usr/sbin/pppd connect '/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /usr/local/etc/ppplogin'
debug crtscts modem defaultroute /dev/ttyS2 19200 asyncmap 0
ppplogin =
ABORT BUSY ABORT 'NO CARRIER' '' ATDTXXXXXXX CONNECT '' ogin:--ogin:
"user" word: "password"
When I try to dialout with mgetty running this is what shows up in the
mgetty log:
02/07 15:28:25 yS2 mgetty: experimental test release 1.1.14-Apr02
02/07 15:28:25 yS2 check for lockfiles
02/07 15:28:25 yS2 checklock: stat failed, no file
02/07 15:28:25 yS2 locking the line
02/07 15:28:25 yS2 makelock(ttyS2) called
02/07 15:28:25 yS2 do_makelock: lock='/var/lock/LCK..ttyS2'
02/07 15:28:25 yS2 lock made
02/07 15:28:26 yS2 tio_get_rs232_lines: status: RTS CTS DSR DTR
02/07 15:28:26 yS2 lowering DTR to reset Modem
02/07 15:28:26 yS2 tss: set speed to 38400 (017)
02/07 15:28:26 yS2 tio_set_flow_control( HARD )
02/07 15:28:26 yS2 waiting for line to clear (VTIME), read:
02/07 15:28:26 yS2 send: \dATQ0V1H0[0d]
02/07 15:28:27 yS2 waiting for ``OK''
Now I dial out
02/07 15:28:27 yS2 got: ATQ0V1H0[0d]
02/07 15:28:27 yS2 CND: ATQ0V1H0[0d][0a]OK ** found **
02/07 15:28:27 yS2 send: ATS0=0Q0&D3&C1[0d]
02/07 15:28:27 yS2 waiting for ``OK''
02/07 15:28:27 yS2 got: [0d]
02/07 15:28:27 yS2 CND: OK[0a]ATS0=0Q0&D3&C1[0d]
02/07 15:28:27 yS2 CND: ATS0=0Q0&D3&C1[0d][0a]OK ** found **
02/07 15:28:27 yS2 waiting for line to clear (VTIME), read: [0d][0a]
02/07 15:28:28 yS2 removing lock file
02/07 15:28:28 yS2 waiting...
02/07 15:29:18 yS2 select returned 1
02/07 15:29:18 yS2 checking lockfiles, locking the line
02/07 15:29:18 yS2 makelock(ttyS2) called
02/07 15:29:18 yS2 do_makelock: lock='/var/lock/LCK..ttyS2'
02/07 15:29:18 yS2 lock not made: lock file exists (pid=458)
02/07 15:29:18 yS2 lock file exists (dialout)!
02/07 15:29:18 yS2 lockfile found, pid=458
02/07 15:29:18 yS2 looking for utmp entry... (my PID: 453)
02/07 15:29:18 yS2 utmp + wtmp entry made
02/07 15:29:18 yS2 lockfile found, pid=458
02/07 15:29:28 yS2 lockfile found, pid=458
02/07 15:29:38 yS2 lockfile found, pid=458
02/07 15:29:48 yS2 lockfile found, pid=458
02/07 15:29:58 yS2 lockfile found, pid=458
02/07 15:30:08 yS2 checklock: stat failed, no file
02/07 15:30:13 yS2 checklock: stat failed, no file
-
And this is what pppd reports in /var/log/messages
Feb 7 15:29:16 batholith kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel
allocation)
Feb 7 15:29:16 batholith kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code
copyright 1995 Caldera, Inc.
Feb 7 15:29:16 batholith kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
Feb 7 15:29:16 batholith kernel: registered device ppp0
Feb 7 15:29:16 batholith pppd[458]: pppd 2.3.5 started by root, uid 0
Feb 7 15:29:17 batholith chat[459]: abort on (BUSY)
Feb 7 15:29:17 batholith chat[459]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Feb 7 15:29:17 batholith chat[459]: send (ATDT6469677^M)
Feb 7 15:29:18 batholith chat[459]: expect (CONNECT)
Feb 7 15:30:03 batholith chat[459]: alarm
Feb 7 15:30:03 batholith pppd[458]: Connect script failed
Feb 7 15:30:03 batholith chat[459]: Failed
Feb 7 15:30:04 batholith pppd[458]: Exit.
Anyone have any ideas? Nothing I have read addresses this. It seems that
pppd and mgetty are seeing each other's locks.
Any tips would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Darren McClelland
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
