Linux-Networking Digest #122, Volume #11 Wed, 12 May 99 01:13:46 EDT
Contents:
Re: Which NIC is good for Linux and Win98? ("cWink")
Re: Linux PPP server and windows network, no browsing, HELP! (Raymonds Doetjes)
Re: IPChains and NetMeeting (Raymonds Doetjes)
Re: New ISP in deep and dire with Redhat 5.2 -- NEED HELP (Hannu)
Re: What's the difference between 3C905 and 3C905B, please? (root)
Re: ipfwadm masq (Chip Transisto)
Re: routing hell ("Curt")
Re: Crossover cable for pc to pc network? ("Jeffrey A. Bell")
10 baseT PCI NIC advice... ("David B. Hostetler")
smb.conf OK. Winblows not logging on. ("David B. Hostetler")
ipchains setup (Chris Szilagyi)
Re: Ethernet VERY slow from Linux to Windows? (Raymonds Doetjes)
Samba Question ("Thunderbolt19")
Re: Samba Working but can't HTTP for configuration. (Raymonds Doetjes)
interface: dummy vs lo (Phil Howard)
"YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: Domain not bound" error (Fung Wai Keung)
Re: tulip driver woes (was Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel?) (Ronald Cole)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: "cWink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Which NIC is good for Linux and Win98?
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 06:19:24 GMT
3com 905x PCIs are pretty reliable and cost between 75 and 80. I wouldn't go
too inexpensive (you get what you pay for)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message <7glmpg$6ep$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Can anybody suggest a good (but inexpensive) 10/100 base PCI ethernet Card
>that is supported by both Linux and Windows 98 OS?
>
>Thanks
>Brian
>
>-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
>http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
From: Raymonds Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux PPP server and windows network, no browsing, HELP!
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 22:30:34 +0200
This is some starnge Windows problem copy the lmhost.sam file to lmhost
and add your premiary WINS server and perhaps your NT DomainCOntroller
name in there and
set the #PRE in the line (the file is pretty obvious). This will always
work
Raymond
Victor Sturgeon wrote:
> I have been wrecking my brain on this for months. I have a linux ppp
> server connected to a Windows, Novell and HP based network.
>
> Everything works fine, I even have IPX working a treat.
>
> My only problem is, dail-in clients are not able to browse the network,
> and in some cases cannot find Windows based computers (other than
> pinging).
>
> On the client end, if i enable Netbios over IPX, it works but this
> causes heavy traffic due to IPX broadcasts. So my problem seems to be
> running netbios over TCP which is the windows default. I also think it
> seems from the fact that PPP does not enable broadcast packets to be
> sent from peer to peer. I've tried running Samba on the ppp server but
> still no browseable windows network.
>
> 3 Question's
> 1. am I right in my assumptions
> 2. Can I fix this, or is there a workaround
> 3. Has anybody else got this working.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --
> Victor Sturgeon
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Raymonds Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IPChains and NetMeeting
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 22:36:24 +0200
You get somethings mixed up.
IPCHAINS and IPFWADM are used to steup firewall rules. One of these rules
are to add masqerading, Masquerading is a part of the firewall code in
the kernel and it doesn't matter if you add a masq rule for ipchains /
ipfwadm it will work.
I have people using netmeeting through the ipchains configured
firewall/masqerading server.
So go ahead.
Raymond
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does/Has anyone passed MS NetMeeting through an IPChains firewall
> setup? I have compiled my kernel per instructions I have researched
> out on the web.... but everything I have seen was for utilizing
> ipfwadm not ipchains.
>
> Does anyone have the ipmasqadm commands for port forwarding? Any help
> would be greatly appreciated!!!
>
> T. McKnight
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hannu)
Subject: Re: New ISP in deep and dire with Redhat 5.2 -- NEED HELP
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 20:38:03 GMT
You might consider something like this:
1.) get fid of the 3Com cards, replace them with Intel Pro 10/100
cards, if your Linux boxes aren't really doing anything, reinstall
them so you get the correct driver detected
2.) Make sure your linux boxes can ping each by the IP address
(number)
3.) set up DNS for your domain. Linux comes with BIND, and you might
want to use O'Reilly's DNS and BIND as a guide to get the domain
going.
4.) Now, consider setting up sendmail, radius etc. If you are
relatively new to Unix, don't start hacking sendmail. It is very
difficult to get right. Radius is not that bad, and your PortMaster
comes with software and manuals.
5.) Obviously your setup is meant to produce revenue, so paying 2-4
000 dollars to get the whole thing going isn't that bad. The ISP setup
is full of little tricks based on experinece which is impossible to
aqcuire if you don't have a lot of time.
Good luck!
Hannu
On Sun, 4 Apr 1999 20:32:23 -0500, "Gerald Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>We have a T-1 connection to the internet, a GTX router, and a
>Livingston/Lucent Portmaster 3 with 48 internal modems. We are waiting for
>two PRI's, but the T-1 is up. The router and the Portmaster are configured
>and can ping UUNET's authentication servers and each other. We have two
>Redhat 5.2 machines set up with 3com cards which cannot see or be seen. We
>are newbies in awful deep, but fighting the need to go back to NT, which is
>what we know. Advise was to run Linux and we are trying to do that--we want
>to do that very much. We have configured and reconfigured until we are wore
>out. Probably no big deal for the Linux pros out there. We thought we would
>be able to find plenty of help, but the help is too often found with to many
>"in-betweens" left out. We need to get this system up and running. If anyone
>can help we would greatly appreciate the help. We have looked into hiring
>UUNET consultants, but $2000.00 a day is awful steep.
>--
>Gerald Barker
>www.aaacs.com
>502-443-9573/9590/9578
>3244 Hovekamp Road
>Paducah, KY 42003-0451
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: What's the difference between 3C905 and 3C905B, please?
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 16:42:57 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Then maybe that was my problem; I was using RH5.2 when I tried to get it
> working. Maybe I'll try to dig one up at work and try it out now that Im on 6.
> Maybe they have better support now that they've had some time to work on it.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chip Transisto)
Subject: Re: ipfwadm masq
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 20:40:25 GMT
Reply-To: Chip Transisto
ipfwadm is not installed automatically in RH 5.2. Look for it in the
RPM's and install it.
You may have the right commands but not the program.
On Tue, 11 May 1999 19:37:45 -0400, hullsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>HELP Please
>2 Days later I am Still banging my head agains the table
>I have read every howto mini howto and usergroup posting I can find
>
>
>I have done to letter everything they have said and yet I can only ping
>from my linux box not the win98 boxs all the machines ping each other
>but not out onto the internet
>
>this is what ipfwadm has to say
>
>acc/m prot source destination ports
>acc/m all 192.168.1.2 anywhere n/a
>
>192.168.1.2 being the first win98 machine 192.168.1.1 being the RH5.2
>box
>
>my command line is
>
>ipfwadm -F -p deny
>ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.2/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>
>all the modprobes are done eg modprobe ip_masq_ftp etc etc etc
>
>I think the problem is with win98 dns setup or something if anyone
>can help it would be much appreciated
> Hullsy
>
>All I wont is all the machines on the my network to reach all aspects
>of the Inernet security right now is not a issue
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: routing hell
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:16:13 -0500
Nothing obviously wrong (that I can see).
Can you ping your default gateway? Other hosts on your segment? Your own
IPs?
Have you tried traceroute? Probably need to use 'traceroute -i eth0 host
' so uses correct interface.
Derek Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:i13_2.11152$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The linux box was working great for a while, but I think I changed
something
> and now it won't access the internet. When I try to ping my nameserver
> (24.0.3.33) I get the message:
> ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
> I'm almost positive that the error is in the routing. I appended the
outputs
> of route, ifconf, and dmesg. I'm using cox@home with a static IP address.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Derek Smith
> Sound Technology Consultants
> www.sound-technology.com
>
>
> route output:
>
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
> Iface
> 24.0.174.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 3
eth0
> 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 6
eth1
> default 24.0.174.1 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0
eth0
> 127.0.0.0 * 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 5 lo
>
>
> ifconfig output:
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:56 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:56 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:9C:56:8E
> inet addr:24.0.174.72 Bcast:24.0.174.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:32 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:41 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
> Interrupt:11 Base address:0x280
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:5A:9C:58:47
> inet addr:192.168.0.10 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:73 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:31 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
> Interrupt:5 Base address:0x300
>
>
>
> dmesg output:
>
> Memory: sized by int13 088h
> Console: 16 point font, 400 scans
> Console: colour VGA+ 80x25, 1 virtual console (max 63)
> pcibios_init : BIOS32 Service Directory structure at 0x000fc1f0
> pcibios_init : BIOS32 Service Directory entry at 0xfc5a0
> pcibios_init : PCI BIOS revision 2.00 entry at 0xfc5d0
> Probing PCI hardware.
> Calibrating delay loop.. ok - 39.73 BogoMIPS
> Memory: 14664k/16384k available (748k kernel code, 384k reserved, 588k
data)
> Swansea University Computer Society NET3.035 for Linux 2.0
> NET3: Unix domain sockets 0.13 for Linux NET3.035.
> Swansea University Computer Society TCP/IP for NET3.034
> IP Protocols: IGMP, ICMP, UDP, TCP
> Linux IP multicast router 0.07.
> VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_5.6.0 initialized
> Checking 386/387 coupling... Ok, fpu using exception 16 error reporting.
> Checking 'hlt' instruction... Ok.
> Intel Pentium with F0 0F bug - workaround enabled.
> alias mapping IDT readonly ... ... done
> Linux version 2.0.36 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 2.7.2.3) #1 Tue
> Oct 13 22:17:11 EDT 1998
> Starting kswapd v 1.4.2.2
> Serial driver version 4.13 with no serial options enabled
> tty00 at 0x03f8 (irq = 4) is a 16450
> Real Time Clock Driver v1.09
> Ramdisk driver initialized : 16 ramdisks of 4096K size
> hda: SAMSUNG SHD-30560A (APRO-5) SSI, 535MB w/126kB Cache, CHS=1087/16/63
> ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
> FDC 0 is an 8272A
> md driver 0.36.3 MAX_MD_DEV=4, MAX_REAL=8
> scsi : 0 hosts.
> scsi : detected total.
> Partition check:
> hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 hda6 hda7 >
> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
> Adding Swap: 33228k swap-space (priority -1)
> Swansea University Computer Society IPX 0.34 for NET3.035
> IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
> Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET3.035
> eth0: 3c509 at 0x280 tag 1, 10baseT port, address 00 10 5a 9c 56 8e, IRQ
> 11.
> 3c509.c:1.16 2/3/98 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> eth1: 3c509 at 0x300 tag 2, 10baseT port, address 00 10 5a 9c 58 47, IRQ
5.
> 3c509.c:1.16 2/3/98 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> eth0: Setting Rx mode to 1 addresses.
> eth1: Setting Rx mode to 0 addresses.
> eth1: Setting Rx mode to 1 addresses.
> sysctl: ip forwarding off
> sysctl: ip forwarding enabled
> VFS: Disk change detected on device 02:00
> EXT2-fs warning: mounting unchecked fs, running e2fsck is recommended
> Swansea University Computer Society IPX 0.34 for NET3.035
> IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera, Inc.
> Appletalk 0.17 for Linux NET3.035
> VFS: Disk change detected on device 02:00
> VFS: Mounted device 02:00 - tssk, tssk
> VFS: inode busy on removed device 02:00
> VFS: Disk change detected on device 02:00
> VFS: Can't find an ext2 filesystem on dev 02:00.
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Jeffrey A. Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Crossover cable for pc to pc network?
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 05:27:21 +0000
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, Thnaks to all who assisting me. My soultion was to hack up the cable that came
with my Netgear ISA Ethernet card, it cost me a whole $2.00, did it myself, was
quite easy. It sure beats the price of a hub. Someone had mentioned that if I
decided to add yet another pc to my home net I would have to throw out this cable,
Why, when a rj-45 cable end only cost a couple of bucks and a few minutes of simple
work. For my other machine(i686) I have purchased a Netgear FA310tx. Now comes the
fun part, setting up my firewall (for IP forwarding) on the i486, recompiling a new
kernel to support networking on the i686.
Thanks.
"Stuart R. Fuller" wrote:
> D. C. & M. V. Sessions ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> : "Stuart R. Fuller" wrote:
> : >
> : > Jeffrey A. Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> : > :
> : > : My question is: Do I have to use a hub to wire these machines together
> : > : or can I just wire the Ethernet cards directly together? I was reading
> : > : somewhere that if I wire them directly together I have to either make a
> : > : crossover cable or purchase one. Is this correct?
> : >
> : > Considering the low cost of a network hub, and the fact that crossover cables
> : > tend to be harder to find and/or more expensive, I'd recommended getting the
> : > hub and standard cables.
> : >
> : > After all, if you get a 3rd computer with network card, you're going to throw
> : > away the crossover cable, and end up buying the hub and standard cables
> : > anyway. Besides, hubs generally have pretty lights that you can watch while
> : > networking, and they (the lights) make great troubleshooting tools for when
> : > things go wrong.
> :
> : Actually, at 100TX hubs are still pricy enough that you're better off
> : adding an extra card to one of the boxes and using it to route IP
> : traffic between the other two. ESPECIALLY if the box in the middle
> : is a server and the other two are clients, it can make a pretty big
> : difference in performance.
>
> Of course, the original query was for a ISA Ethernet card and a PCI Ethernet
> card. The ISA card generally limits you to 10baseT, so a cheap 10bT hub will
> do just fine.
>
> Stu
--
Jeffrey A. Bell
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing.
-- Wernher von Braun --
------------------------------
From: "David B. Hostetler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 10 baseT PCI NIC advice...
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:21:11 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am looking for a good 10 baseT PCI nic for my Linux machine. I am fed
up with the ISA pnp NE2000 compatible, (just look at this newsgroup and
you will shy away from that card.) Does the PCI version work any better?
------------------------------
From: "David B. Hostetler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: smb.conf OK. Winblows not logging on.
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:19:11 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have configured smb.conf, tested it with testparm and it check OK. The
Winbox still does not see the RedHat server as the domain server. What
do I need to check? Is the setting in Windoze or RedHat?
------------------------------
From: Chris Szilagyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipchains setup
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 16:40:49 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to set up ipchains on red hat 6.0. I simply
would like to forward all incoming imap connections (port
143) through a firewall and to a machine behind the firewall
(ip 192.168.2.2) on port 143. What are the entries required
to do this? I have read the ipchains HOWTO and still no
luck.
Thanks in advance.
Chris
------------------------------
From: Raymonds Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ethernet VERY slow from Linux to Windows?
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 22:03:15 +0200
Oh, perhaps your Win98 has a Novell/Ne2000 detected and your card is a NE2000
compatible (or vice
versa).
That happend to me once with Win95 about 3 years ago. It had alike wise probelem.
Raymond
Massimo Piccinetti wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i have a strange problem with 2 pc with Ethernet.
>
> I use Windows98 on a pc with Celeron 333 128M with an economic Ethernet ISA
>Novel2000 card,
> and Linux RedHat5.2 on a Pentium 150 64M with an economic Ethernet PCI Novel 2000
>card.
>
> Using FTP (and samba, Zannet NFS, and so on...) the data transfer from Windows to
>Linux is
> about 600K/sec, BUT the data transfer from Linux to Windows is about 7K/sec!!!
>
> This is a great problem, because in some situations Windows98 freeze because of this.
>
> Another problem: when i used the command "yes" with an emulator like Ewan, Windows95
>freeze!!!
> (i have not tried it with Windows 98). I am sure that the the problem is that such
>command generates
> bytes very fast, and probably Linux creates big datagrams. If i insert some delay in
>the main loop
> the command works well.
>
> Maybe there are some problems with the TCP/IP implementation with Linux or Windows?
>
> Someome can help me?
>
> Thank you.
>
> ==================================================================
> Massimo Piccinetti
> via del Ponte, 109
> 61032 Fano (Pesaro)
> ITALY
> Tel. casa: +39 721 825.826
> Tel. uff.: +39 71 73.01.116
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> GPS: UTM 33T 342.663
> 4.854.802
------------------------------
From: "Thunderbolt19" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Samba Question
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 23:55:51 -0400
I am using Redhat 5.2. How can I configure Samba so that I can use the
Linux box as a fileserver for my Windows PC's? I can see it thru the browse
list now... It shows up as "mygroup". Any suggestions would be greatly
appreciated.
--
Eric Waters
Total Distribution, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Raymonds Doetjes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Samba Working but can't HTTP for configuration.
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 22:33:39 +0200
Please check my definiations (He created a Logon server that could fool
everyone beacuse you think it is a NT server).
http://node102bd.a2000.nl/rdoetjes
De file server option is the only one that is yet implemented.
Raymond
"...Bob" wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have Samba working in that I can see public and home directories on the
> linux box from each of two Win98 boxes. But where I at one time (a prior
> 'installation') use http://linux1:901/ to access the Samba configuration, I
> can't now. (I can though access linuxconfig via http://linux1:98 if it
> means anything).
>
> Suggestions?
> --
>
> ...Bob, NYC
> (Newsgroup reply preferred)
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Howard)
Subject: interface: dummy vs lo
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:20:38 GMT
I'm adding lots of extra IPs to a machine. Because the machine
has 2 ethernet cards, and the traffic for these IPs may come in
either one (a backup scheme) I did not alias the IPs on those
interfaces. Instead, I aliased them on "lo".
Which to me begs the question, why do we need the "dummy" net
driver at all (aside from being able to do this for way more
than 256 IP addresses)?
--
Phil Howard KA9WGN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fung Wai Keung)
Subject: "YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: Domain not bound" error
Date: 12 May 1999 03:50:36 GMT
Hi,
I have setup a NIS domain to serve 3 linux PCs (1 PC as NIS server and 2
PCs as clients). One of the clients always show "YPBINDPROC_DOMAIN: Domain not
bound" errors when I telnet to other machine or run programs located in NFS
filesystem. I also can't ftp into this client.
I check my /var/log/messages file and find that a list of
May 12 06:56:51 maemb1 ypbind[335]: broadcast: RPC: Timed out.
May 12 06:58:15 maemb1 ypbind[335]: broadcast: RPC: Timed out.
May 12 06:59:39 maemb1 ypbind[335]: broadcast: RPC: Timed out.
May 12 07:01:04 maemb1 ypbind[335]: broadcast: RPC: Timed out.
May 12 07:02:28 maemb1 ypbind[335]: broadcast: RPC: Timed out.
May 12 07:03:52 maemb1 ypbind[335]: broadcast: RPC: Timed out.
May 12 07:05:16 maemb1 ypbind[335]: broadcast: RPC: Timed out.
errors is logged.
How to solve this error?
And, I can't start NFS and portmap daemons in this PC, as
maemb1:/var/log>rpcinfo -p maemb1
program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 rpcbind
100000 2 udp 111 rpcbind
100007 2 udp 935 ypbind
100007 2 tcp 937 ypbind
However, this PC can mount remote filesystem, but cannot export filesystems to
other nodes. Is it caused by the NIS problem described above?
Thanks in advance.
--
Regards,
Wai Keung, Fung
Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering,
The Chinese University of Hong Kong,
Shatin, N.T.,
Hong Kong.
Tel: (852)26098056 Fax: (852)26036002
------------------------------
From: Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: tulip driver woes (was Re: Reliable (!) nic for 2.2 kernel?)
Date: 11 May 1999 14:32:05 -0700
bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't necessarily need the -latest- driver, just the most stable in
> the 2.2 world. in 2.0.36, things were great.
No, they weren't. I'm running linux-2.0.36 on my 486 firewall with
two Kingston (tulip) PCI NICs and the net hangs on that machine quite
often. It requires me to go to the console, bring down eth0, bring it
back up, and re-add the route before things work again.
> now they're not so great. what happened in-between?
linux-2.0.36 has tulip-0.89H and linux-2.2.7 has tulip-0.89H.
You tell me!
--
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412
Ronald Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152
My PGP fingerprint: 15 6E C7 91 5F AF 17 C4 24 93 CB 6B EB 38 B5 E5
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
