Linux-Networking Digest #126, Volume #11 Wed, 12 May 99 08:13:33 EDT
Contents:
Re: Tape Backup software (IEEE Project)
Re: PPP-COMPRESSION and NET-PF ("Tamas Rudnai")
Re: can't anybody help ?! ("Curt")
linux ppp ipmasq ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: can't anybody help ?! ("Curt")
samba & using printers on user-level security win95! NO GURU'S ANYMORE? ("Jantje
Smit")
Re: Dialup PPP Server Problem ("Hoyt")
Re: Serial Monitor ("Curt")
Re: ipfwadm masq (Andrew)
Re: ipfwadm (Paul Rusty Russell)
Re: LinuxPing -> NTping net problems DEC PCI (Andrew)
Reboot linux 5.2 box from telnet connection ("Richard Miller")
Re: IP forwarding in firewalls and masquerade boxes (Paul Rusty Russell)
Re: Help with Telnet ("Richard Miller")
Re: Two 3c509 Cards in one computer ("Curt")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (IEEE Project)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup,hk.comp.os.linux,tw.bbs.comp.linux
Subject: Re: Tape Backup software
Date: 12 May 1999 09:49:10 GMT
You may also consider cpio which is a standard Unix command.
To write to tape,
cd /
find . -print | cpio -ocv >(tape device file) 2>error.log
To write to tape with data compression,
find . -print | gzip | cpio -ocv >(tape device file) 2>error.log
To read from the tape,
cpio -icv <(tape device file) 2>error.log
or gzip -d <(tape device file) | cpio -icv 2>error.log
To list the content in the tape,
cpio -itcv <(tape device file) 2>error.log
You can also use no-rewind tape device file if you want to write multiple
sessions in a single tape.
Wolfgang Ganzert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: For the KDE window environment there is the kdat program. It allows
: multiple tars on a single tape and has a GUI which is easy to use. On my
: systems it does not run stable but maybe this is because I'm using KDE
: 1.0. Maybe with 1.1 the problem is fixed, I don't known.
: Wolfgang
: Ron Flory wrote:
: > > I'm looking for a very easy & good DAT tape backup software.
: > > Any idea?
: >
: > depends how fancy it needs to be. 'cat file.tar.gz > /dev/st0' works
: > fine for me.
: >
: > ron
------------------------------
From: "Tamas Rudnai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP-COMPRESSION and NET-PF
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 11:01:43 +0100
Lee wrote in message <7h9jn7$3el$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>in /etc/modules.conf:
It works fine, thanks! The solution of net-pf problem was the quite same (I
found the details about it in Documentation/networks/modules.txt). But ppp
still drop the line... I will debug it.
Thank you, Tamas
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can't anybody help ?!
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 05:26:56 -0500
Eric Trimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Tue, 11 May 1999, Curt wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 11 MAY 1999 17:08:31 -0500
> > From: Curt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Newgroups: comp.os.linux.networking
> > Subject: Re: can't anybody help ?!
> >
> > Have you tried using a different phone line? Maybe something has
happened
> > to make it to noisy to work.
> > I seemed to have to complain about noise on my line at least once a
year.
> >
> How do you go about complaining about noise ? I've had Sprint local (they
> used to use the name "United Of NJ" ) check the physical lines outside my
> house; but they claim everything id OK.
>
> Thanks,
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Eric Trimmer email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> of Web Address: http://et.trimmer.org
> et.trimmer.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: linux ppp ipmasq
Date: Fri, 07 May 1999 05:58:53 GMT
Hi everybody,
I have a PPP server setup on a linux box, and everything was working great
with IP masquerading until just recently and I'm not sure what's up. The
linux masquerading works fine for LAN machines and ppp (provided that you
change the default route; see below).
Anyways, the problem is that the PPP client (Win95 or WinNT) is setting the
default route to be the IP address it gets from diplogin/pppd. I have to
manually go and delete the default route and add the proper default route.
My routing table looks like the following. The 192.168.2. network is my LAN
segment (can ignore this network) and I am trying to dial into my friend's
box who is using the 192.168.1. network and getting the IP 192.168.1.13 (his
modem) and my default gateway is being set to the 192.168.1.13 address. The
default gateway should be set to 192.168.1.1 so that IP masquerading works.
This was working and then all of a sudden it stops working, any ideas?
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.13 192.168.1.13 1
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.1 192.168.2.3 2
127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.13 192.168.1.13 1
192.168.1.13 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.3 192.168.2.3 2
192.168.2.3 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1
192.168.2.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.2.3 192.168.2.3 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.1.13 192.168.1.13 1
224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.2.3 192.168.2.3 1
255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.2.3 192.168.2.3 1
===========================================================================
TIA,
please reply via email too
============= Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ============
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: can't anybody help ?!
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 05:29:42 -0500
You can generally hear the noise yourself when placing a voice call.
Eric Trimmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> On Tue, 11 May 1999, Curt wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 11 MAY 1999 17:08:31 -0500
> > From: Curt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Newgroups: comp.os.linux.networking
> > Subject: Re: can't anybody help ?!
> >
> > Have you tried using a different phone line? Maybe something has
happened
> > to make it to noisy to work.
> > I seemed to have to complain about noise on my line at least once a
year.
> >
> How do you go about complaining about noise ? I've had Sprint local (they
> used to use the name "United Of NJ" ) check the physical lines outside my
> house; but they claim everything id OK.
>
> Thanks,
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Eric Trimmer email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> of Web Address: http://et.trimmer.org
> et.trimmer.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
------------------------------
From: "Jantje Smit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: samba & using printers on user-level security win95! NO GURU'S ANYMORE?
Date: 12 May 1999 10:41:52 GMT
Hi!
I've got RH52 and the samba version that came with the RH distribution. Now
I want to use printers on win95 stations.
I've got a Novell network and userlevel security on win95, the userlist is
fetched from the novell (3.2) server.
Anytime I try to connect to a win95 station this message is displayed:
Session request failed (131,130)
with myname=PRINT destname=COMPUTER
Called name not present
Try to connect to another name (instead of COMPUTER)
Any way to connect anyway?
Frits Hoogland
------------------------------
From: "Hoyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Dialup PPP Server Problem
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:07:31 -0400
Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
> Do I need masquerading if I have a set of dedicated real IP's to use
> for the dialups?
>
No, with _real_ IP's, masquerading is not needed.
Check /etc/resolv.conf for the DNS problem.
Hoyt
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Serial Monitor
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 06:19:54 -0500
You might consider a VGA/keyboard/mouse extender, available from various
sources like Black Box, and
combine that with a monitor/keyboard/mouse switch. Kinda expensive, but
then you get to leave everything 'stock'. I've used both with good results.
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 11:26:05 +0000
From: Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipfwadm masq
Hello,
Hm.... would it help to select a protocol??
ipfwadm -F -a m -P all -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0/0 # for the whole class C
network
or
ipfwadm -F -a m -P all -S 192.168.1.2/32 -D 0/0 # for just the windows
machine
hullsy wrote:
> HELP Please
> 2 Days later I am Still banging my head agains the table
> I have read every howto mini howto and usergroup posting I can find
>
> I have done to letter everything they have said and yet I can only ping
> from my linux box not the win98 boxs all the machines ping each other
> but not out onto the internet
>
> this is what ipfwadm has to say
>
> acc/m prot source destination ports
> acc/m all 192.168.1.2 anywhere n/a
>
> 192.168.1.2 being the first win98 machine 192.168.1.1 being the RH5.2
> box
>
> my command line is
>
> ipfwadm -F -p deny
> ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.2/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>
> all the modprobes are done eg modprobe ip_masq_ftp etc etc etc
>
> I think the problem is with win98 dns setup or something if anyone
> can help it would be much appreciated
> Hullsy
>
> All I wont is all the machines on the my network to reach all aspects
> of the Inernet security right now is not a issue
------------------------------
Subject: Re: ipfwadm
From: Paul Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 11 May 1999 04:22:24 +0930
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I am trying to setup transparent proxying on a linux machine. I have all of
> the forwarding code built into the kernel. For some reason, ipfwadm keeps
> giving me an error. Here is what I am doing:
>
> /sbin/ipfwadm -F -p accept
> /sbin/ipfwadm -I -i accept -b -P tcp -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 80 -r 3128
>
> I get the error "ipfwadm: setsockopt failed: Invalid argument" when I try the
> second line. I see if anything happen:
You do not have CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_PROXY enabled in your kernel
configuration.
Rusty.
--
Tridge, Raster, DaveM, Cort, maddog... Where will you be 9-11 July 1999?
http://www.linux.org.au/projects/calu
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 11:34:12 +0000
From: Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.ms-windows.networking.tcp-ip,comp.os.ms-windows.networking.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.misc
Subject: Re: LinuxPing -> NTping net problems DEC PCI
Hello,
What seems to be the problem?? I don't really understand your post?
Did you know that 192.168.10.0 is a network address, not a IP address.
Your linux machine seems to be using the IP 192.168.10.2 ?? Did you
try pinging that from the NT box?
Matt wrote:
> Well my Nt<->Nt config works fine, I needed to test the cards,
> and the cable.
>
> Next its the Linux<->Nt still no luck there. I think its the config on
> Linux.
> How can I test to see if I am only using TCP/IP and not NetBxxx ?
> Is there an easy option, I can imagine I can remove the NetBxxx
> on the routing of My Computer/Networking but I'd hate to messup
> the config again.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Matt
>
> Sylvan Butler wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 09 May 1999 09:47:34 +0100, Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Pinging to Linux Box from NT ?
> > >
> > >Pinging 192.168.10.0 with 32 bytes of data:
> >
> > 192.168.10.0 would be an illegal IP address.
> >
> > >Pinging NT itsself (same IP addess)
> > >Pinging 192.168.10.1 with 32 bytes of data:
> >
> > 192.168.10.1 is legal.
> >
> > >Pinging Linux Box ?
> >
> > Where from?
> >
> > >Pinging on Linux..
> > >
> > >% ping 192.168.10.0
> > >
> > >PING 192.168.10.0 (192.168.10.0): 56 data bytes
> > >
> > >
> > >--- 192.168.10.0 ping statistics ---
> > >7 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
> >
> > Yup. That illegal IP again.
> >
> > >% ping 192.168.10.1
> > >
> > >PING 192.168.10.1 (192.168.10.1): 56 data bytes
> > >
> > >--- 192.168.10.1 ping statistics ---
> > >6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
> >
> > OK, a route must be bad.
> >
> > >% ping 192.168.10.2 (itself)
> > >
> > >PING 192.168.10.2 (192.168.10.2): 56 data bytes
> > >64 bytes from 192.168.10.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
> >
> > Looks good.
> >
> > >% netstat -rn
> > >
> > >Kernel IP routing table
> > >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> > >192.168.10.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 1500 0 0 dummy0
> > >192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0 0 eth0
> > >127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 3584 0 0 lo
> > >
> > >% route
> > >
> > >Kernel IP routing table
> > >Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> > >192.168.10.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 dummy0
> > >192.168.10.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 2 eth0
> > >127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 2 lo
> >
> > Do you notice that those are both the same?
> >
> > That route to 192.168.10.2 seems bogus...
> >
> > What is the 'dummy0' device? Are you perhaps running IPAlias? If so, Why?
> >
> > I'd probably delete that route to dummy...
> > "route del 192.168.10.2"
> > But it doesn't appear to be used, so it probably won't matter.
> >
> > >% ifconfig
> > >dummy0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
> > > inet addr:192.168.10.2 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > >
> > >eth0 Link encap:10Mbps Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:C7:99:0D:F4
> > > inet addr:192.168.10.2 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > > RX packets:0 errors:477 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > TX packets:0 errors:20 dropped:0 overruns:0
> > > Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe800
> >
> > Other than the questionable dummy, that info looks good.
> >
> > What is the NT netmast, default gw, etc.?
> >
> > sdb
> > --
> > | Sylvan Butler | Not speaking for Hewlett-Packard | sbutler-boi.hp.com |
> > | Watch out for my e-mail address. Thank UCE. #### change ^ to @ #### |
> > They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> > safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. --Benjamin Franklin, 1759
> > "Don't Tread On Me!"
------------------------------
From: "Richard Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Reboot linux 5.2 box from telnet connection
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:33:30 -0500
Is there anyway to reboot a redhat 5.2 linux box from a telnet connection?
Actually, I would like to log on as root and do all maintenance from my
client. This is just a small home network with two win98 clients and the
linux server so security and control is not an issue. I want to put the
server in the basement but don't want to go down there just to reboot or do
system maintenance (since I'm new to linux I'm doing a lot of both right
now<g>). I can su to root but still don't have full privileges from the
telnet connection (can't write some .conf files, etc). Thanks. Richard
------------------------------
Subject: Re: IP forwarding in firewalls and masquerade boxes
From: Paul Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 11 May 1999 04:23:45 +0930
"newsvr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Firewall HOWTO and some other sources that I've looked at emphasize that
> you should turn IP forwarding off in firewalls and (I believe) IP
> masquerading boxes as well. In principle I understand that you should turn
> off all the services possible to secure a box. My question is, what
> vulnerabilities does IP forwarding expose?
To do masquerading, you need IP forwarding ON. No pass packet, no
masquerade.
Rusty.
--
Tridge, Raster, DaveM, Cort, maddog... Where will you be 9-11 July 1999?
http://www.linux.org.au/projects/calu
------------------------------
From: "Richard Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with Telnet
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:26:37 -0500
Can you ping the IP address of the linux box? My host name is the linux
box IP address (not the name) and I am connecting to port 'telnet' using
VT100 emulation. One possibility is that the telnet port (23 I think) is in
use by another application. I'm new to linux myself so I don't remember how
to check for port usage but I read about it somewhere <g>. Another point to
keep in mind is that my linux box will not allow me to make a telnet
connection as root. I set up a normal user account on the linux box and su
to root when needed.
Georg Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7haat3$g4i$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have recently installed RH 5.2 linux linked to Win 98 clients.
>
> Whenever I run telnet from the Win98 clients, I get a blank screen.
Nothing
> actually happens, the cursor just stays in the corner.
>
> I have checked the inetd.conf file and telnet is enabled. Running telnet
on
> the server itself seems to work, although I am not familiar with manual
> telnet commands.
>
> Is there some way telnet is disabled from accepting incoming connections
or
> what?
>
> I need some info on setting up a working telnet configuration. Where do I
> start?
>
>
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Two 3c509 Cards in one computer
Date: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:43:06 -0500
I assume you don't want eth1 at irq 3, since that is reserved for 2nd serial
port (COM2).
You probably want to use IRQ 10 or 11 for eth1. IRQ 5 is fine for eth0.
Try this in your /etc/conf.modules
options eth0 io=0x210 irq=5
options eth1 io=0x300 irq=10
options eth1 io=
alias eth0 3c509
alias eth1 3c509
You'll need to use your DOS based NIC config software to set the io and irqs
as you expect them to be in
your /etc/conf.modules.
Don't use lilo append unless you've compiled the drivers into your kernel.
Base on your post, it doesn't look like they are in your kernel.
Jonathon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:7hao1l$rjc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>
>
> I'm trying to configure a PC with 2 3c509b network
> cards in it, to now avail.
>
> I did read Mini-HowTo on using multiple
> Ethernet Adapters with Linux V 2.00
> ( http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/misc/multicard.html
> is where I found the copy I read. )
>
> Operating System: Linux
> Distribution: RedHat 5.2
> CPU Intel Pentium II
> RAM 64 MB
> Network Protocol TCP/IP
> Network Cards 3Com 3c509B ISA
> { 3c509B, not 3c905B }
>
> PnP for the network cards has been disabled.
> Testing them using the DOS Utilities on the disk
> we recieved with the card shows that each
> card does work
>
>
>
> writing /etc/conf/modules as
>
> alias eth0 3c509
> alias eth1 3c509
> options 3c509 0x210,0x300
>
> resulted in the system not recognising _either_ card.
>
> writing /etc/lilo.conf
>
> append = "ether=5,0x210,eth1"
> rest of the lilo.conf
>
> resulted in that card being recognised, but
> not both. Changing it
>
> append = "ether=5,0x210,eth1 ether=3,0x300,eth0"
>
> resulted in neither card being recognised.
>
> What other alternatives are there --- or what have
> I missed, to get both cards to work.
>
> Or do I just have to learn how to compile the
> kernel? And pray that I correctly include
> everything I should?
>
>
>
>
> The current system configuration and results
> are as follows
>
>
> /etc/conf/modules is as follows
>
> alias eth0 3c509
> alias eth1 3c509
>
> /etc/lilo.conf is as follows
>
> boot=/dev/hda map=/boot/map install=/boot/boot.b prompt timeout=50
> image=/boot/vmlinuz-2.0.36-0.7
> label=linux
> root=/dev/hda1
> read-only
>
>
> /etc/hosts is as follows
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain
> 209.102.31.165 vrystaat.stamp-coin.com
> 209.102.31.166 firewall.stamp-coin.com
> 209.102.31.164 natal.stamp-coin.com
> 209.102.31.163 capeofstorms.stamp-coin.com
>
> ifconfig gives the following output
> ( Which is _not_ adjusted for LF/CR )
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP BROADCAST LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3584 Metric:1
> RX packets:2483 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:2483 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:22:09:BE
> inet addr:209.102.31.165 Bcast:209.102.31.191
> Mask:255.255.255.192
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:11219 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:17744 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:1042
> Interrupt:5 Base address:0x210
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:22:25:CD
> inet addr:209.102.31.166 Bcast:209.102.31.191
> Mask:255.255.255.192
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:2840 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:46 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0
> Interrupt:3 Base address:0x300
>
>
> Ping gives the following results
>
> PING 209.102.31.165 (209.102.31.165): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from
> 209.102.31.165: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms 64 bytes from
> 209.102.31.165: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms 64 bytes from
> 209.102.31.165: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms 64 bytes from
> 209.102.31.165: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms 64 bytes from
> 209.102.31.165: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.1 ms
>
> --- 209.102.31.165 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 packets
> received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.1/0.1/0.1 ms
>
>
> PING 209.102.31.166 (209.102.31.166): 56 data bytes
>
> --- 209.102.31.166 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 0 packets
> received, 100% packet loss
>
>
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> Jonathon
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ( and when I get this network configured
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
>
>
> --
> I'm still looking for a good book on
> 3: The Recent Unpleasantness
> 1: The War Of Northern Aggression.
> 2: The War of Southern Rebellion.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
