Linux-Networking Digest #136, Volume #11 Thu, 13 May 99 01:13:35 EDT
Contents:
newbie-to-lan: cannot ping other box (hazzmat)
Re: ipchains setup (Paul Rusty Russell)
Re: Problems with IPv4 Forwarding (Paul Rusty Russell)
smbmount (hullsy)
Re: PCI modems in linux? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
how do I dial into my linux box? (Tjalfe)
Re: Redhat 6.0 and ipfwadm (mist)
Re: Using Linux as router (please help) ("K.A. Steensma")
serial networks (Nick)
pap authentication failure Help.. ("Burton")
Re: DHCP build concern (Azfar Kazmi)
Re: Howto/Documentation on Tunneling with 2.2.x ? ("steve")
Re: Usernet 'configuration' (Steve Hall)
Re: connection to Prodigy (bill davidsen)
Re: Is this possible? (VPN+IPMASQ) (Walter Hunt)
Re: IBM Token-Ring (bill davidsen)
Re: Reboot linux 5.2 box from telnet connection (Azfar Kazmi)
Re: serial networks (bill davidsen)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: hazzmat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: newbie-to-lan: cannot ping other box
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 22:58:48 -0400
Hello,
Redhat 6.0 ISA ne2000 compatible (added at 0x300 base
address, irq9 kernel module loads fine at boot) cat 5 cable -> Intel
in-bidness 5 port 10base-T hub -> mac g3 10/100 builtin ethernet.
I give eth0 address of 192.168.1.1 and give the Mac an address of
192.168.1.2 linux host with the eth0 192.168.1.100 Activate interface in
netcfg Ok. Ping loopback-OK. Ping eth0 address OK. That's as far as it
goes. Can't ping host IP (should I be able to do that ?) and can't ping
the G3's address either.
The G3 lights up the LED on the hub seeking the Linux box, so I know
packets are leaving the G3. Also, just for fun I tell the G3 to connect
to Linux host as though it were a file servert, it returns 'connection
refused, try later'-- that's different from the message returned when I
try to make it connect to a non-extant IP. On the other hand, there are
only very occasional blips on the hub when I try to ping the G3 from the
Linux PC. I still can't ping thre G3 if I remove the hub. G3 and Linux
host addres are in /etc/hosts.
what am I not doing right here? I have the 560 +page Linux Network
Toolkit book on hand, and I am stymied. Any help appreciated.
--hazzmat
------------------------------
Subject: Re: ipchains setup
From: Paul Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 12 May 1999 03:32:04 +0930
Chris Szilagyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to set up ipchains on red hat 6.0. I simply
> would like to forward all incoming imap connections (port
> 143) through a firewall and to a machine behind the firewall
> (ip 192.168.2.2) on port 143. What are the entries required
> to do this? I have read the ipchains HOWTO and still no
> luck.
Hi Chris,
You need `ipmasqadm portfw'. I don't know if ipmasqadm is
included in RH 6.0.
Rusty.
--
Tridge, Raster, DaveM, Cort, maddog... Where will you be 9-11 July 1999?
http://www.linux.org.au/projects/calu
------------------------------
Subject: Re: Problems with IPv4 Forwarding
From: Paul Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 12 May 1999 03:33:37 +0930
Erik Norvelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Howdy:
>
> I am trying to set up a NAT box so that I can set up a "virtual" web server. So
> far I have got my two ethernet cards installed and configured, one with a
> "real" IP address (eth0), and one with a 198.16.2.x address (eth1). I have IP
> forwarding turned on in the kernel, I have the /proc filesystem enabled, and in
> my /etc/sysconfig/network script, I have "FORWARD_IPV4" set to "Yes".
If this is a 2.2 kernel, you need ipchains, not ipfwadm.
Rusty.
--
Tridge, Raster, DaveM, Cort, maddog... Where will you be 9-11 July 1999?
http://www.linux.org.au/projects/calu
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 11:30:49 -0400
From: hullsy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: smbmount
Has anyone got smbmount to work my command line is
smbmount //monsta.spawn.net/winhd /mnt/winhd -n
monsta.spawn.net being the win98machine and the share is called
winhd I have not set a password
the mount point is obviously /mnt/winhd and the -n is for no
passwords
I have read all availiable material I can find It seems in that in news
groups Its a common problem
The error it keeps returning is mount error invalid argument
Ive made the dir /mnt/winhd before you ask
Any help would bee much appreciated
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: PCI modems in linux?
Date: 12 May 1999 19:56:55 PDT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "C. E. Scheetz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>PlatoAtAccesswestDotCom wrote:
>
>> Richard Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >We do have a PCI modem that is NOT a "Win" modem, it is controller based,
>> >and uses the Lucent Venus chipset.
>>
>> The info on your company home page does NOT support you assertion.
>> Give us a link to info that DOES support you assertion.
>
>I am replying to this because this is also an interest of mine - the
>information below is lifted from
>http://www.lucent.com/micro/dsp/k56prod.html. As you can see, it lists 5
>chipsets - and only one of them is a "softmodem" or controllerless modem.
>The other 4 have controllers (I am assuming so; let me know if I'm wrong on
>this so I don't persue it further) but were still marketed as "Winmodems"
>because they had no intention of supporting drivers for anything but Win9x.
>So could this mean that many fully chipped PCI modems were marketed as
>Win-modems because they didn't offer an OS2 driver? My RedHat 5.2 /proc/pci
>reads this chip off of the bus as stating that it has a L56xMF chipset.
>
>So hard is it going to be to get these modems to work under linux?
>Chris Scheetz
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Let me add my two cents worth here. I have been
shopping out a new Linux system (see thread "Newbi vs Linux:
Comment on this system"). What i have found is that there
are at least three kinds of modems out there (not two).
THere is the usual "Real modem" This modem looks
like a UART (or serial port) to the system. This type of
modem need _NOTHING_ to work with any system. It
doesn't matter every OS knows how to send charecters
out (and get them in) to a serial port. Windows may
install an INI file for these modems, but in most case
it is just an ASCII text file containing the init string for
the modem. A veryation of this type is the Plug and Play
modem. Plug and play simply sets the hardware parameters,
such as IO address and interupt. After PnP has done it's
thing, the modem acts like any other real modem.
The second type of modem is the well known and dispised
Win-Modem or HSP (Host Signal Processing) Modem. THese
modems are pretty well useless since they require that
the CPU do a lot of the processing work done by the
controler chip on a real modem. There is also no standard
(that I could discover) for the hardware interface to these
modems.
A third type of modem is the cause of much confusion.
It appears to be a real modem because it has a controler,
but it only seems to work with windows. I call this a
DSP based modem. Althought I realize that is bad choice
of terms. What we have here is a modem that has a
controler, but it is based on a generic DSP chip.
THe DSP handles many of the tasks that the driver of
a HSP (or Win-modem) would have to handle. But
the hardware interface to the system is not standard,
in other words, it doesn't look like a UART. The
keyword to look for here is "Virtual UART" or
"Virtual 16550". Now what does that mean? I'll try
to tell you. I'm a bit hazy on the programing aspects.
What happens is that a vertual device driver is written
for windows that places protection on certian IO addresses,
specificly, the IO addresses for the chosen com port
for the modem. Now, normaly a UART would live at those
addresses, But this type of modem has no UART. Now
when a program attempts to access the non-existing
UART at the protected IO addresses, it causes a trap
to accoure. The trap causes the virtual device driver
to kick in. The function of the UART is then emulated
in software. As far as an application is concerned,
there is a UART at that address (except that the
responce time may be a bit off), but in reality there
is none. Thus the "Virtual UART". This modem
isn't a winmodem or HSP modem per-se, but it
won't work in Linux either.
--
Just my $0.02 worth.
Hope this helps,
Gordon
PS:
For e-mail: replace 'X.bleeb' with 'greeder'.
I do not tollerate spam. Any unsolicited bulk
e-mail will result in a complaint to your ISP.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tjalfe)
Subject: how do I dial into my linux box?
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 03:00:09 GMT
Hi there.
I would like to know how I would go about having my modem in my linux machine pick up
an incomming call, and allow a terminal, connection /ppp connection ( whatever the
correct terminology is).
the modem is connected to /dev/cua1, and I have PPP support in the kernel...
Thanks in advance
Kasper
------------------------------
From: mist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0 and ipfwadm
Date: Sat, 8 May 1999 11:53:28 +0100
Reply-To: mist <new$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Paul Nevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribed to us that -
>I just installed RedHat 6 which does not have ipfwadm anymore.
>Apparently
>there is ipfwadm-wrapper and ipchains modules to do the same thing. Has
>
>anyone managed to configure the new modules to do what many of us do
>with
>ipfwadm.
Yes. I should figure that lots of people have. 8-) There is a ipchains
howto which has a good comparison guide between ipchains and ipfwadm,
though a newer (1.3.9) version of it should be coming soon, correcting a
few mistakes and improving it.
>
>Here is my internal ipfwadm configuration to share a single modem with
>my
>intranet..
>
>extract from my /etc/rc.d/rc.local
>############################
>echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
<snip>
># deny all ips except specified ones
>/sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny
/sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY
># allow only these ips
>/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.10.2/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 #bob
>/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.10.3/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 #jane
>/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.10.4/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 #mike
>/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.10.5/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 #kym
>/sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.10.6/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0 #paul
I don't really understand the subnetting you're using. Anyway, the
format for masquerading is -
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s $LOCALNET -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE
Where localnet is the machines I want to masquerade for (IE
192.168.10.0/255.255.255.0) and EXTERNAL_INTERFACE is ppp0, or whatever.)
The -d 0.0.0.0/0 is implied, I believe.
--
Mist.
------------------------------
From: "K.A. Steensma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using Linux as router (please help)
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 03:35:31 GMT
Take a look at -
www.linuxrouter.org
It runs on most hardware larger than a 386' and is self-contained on a
single 1.44M floppy.
(I don't even run a CPU fan or power supply fan in the unit that I have
running). KAS
Aaron wrote:
> i have 3 win 98 boxes and want get internet access through a linux box.
> How do i do this
>
> thanks in advance
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: serial networks
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 03:37:20 GMT
Can anyone help me in trying to set up a serial cable network? I know
it is used very commonly to link Unix servers to dumb terminals, and I
would like to try it at home with three Linux machines.
------------------------------
From: "Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: pap authentication failure Help..
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 22:30:28 -0600
ok heres the kernel messages i get
May 12 22:21:25 www pppd[1509]: pppd 2.3.7 started by root, uid 0
May 12 22:21:26 www chat[1512]: send (ATZ^M)
May 12 22:21:27 www chat[1512]: expect (OK)
May 12 22:21:27 www chat[1512]: ATZ^M^M
May 12 22:21:27 www chat[1512]: OK
May 12 22:21:27 www chat[1512]: -- got it
May 12 22:21:27 www chat[1512]: send (ATM3S11=50S10=150^M)
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1512]: expect (OK)
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1512]: ^M
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1512]: ATM3S11=50S10=150^M^M
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1512]: OK
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1512]: -- got it
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1514]: report (CONNECT)
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1514]: report (BUSY)
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1514]: report (NO)
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1514]: abort on (ERROR)
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1514]: abort on (BUSY)
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1514]: abort on (NO)
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1514]: abort on (RING)
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1514]: send (ATDT990-0900^M)
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1514]: expect (CONNECT)
May 12 22:21:28 www chat[1514]: ^M
May 12 22:21:43 www chat[1514]: ATDT990-0900^M^M
May 12 22:21:43 www chat[1514]: CONNECT
May 12 22:21:43 www chat[1514]: -- got it
May 12 22:21:43 www pppd[1509]: Serial connection established.
May 12 22:21:43 www kernel: ppp_ioctl: set dbg flags to 10000
May 12 22:21:43 www kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 10000
May 12 22:21:43 www pppd[1509]: Using interface ppp0
May 12 22:21:43 www kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xasyncmap
May 12 22:21:43 www pppd[1509]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS0
May 12 22:21:43 www kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap ffffffff
May 12 22:21:43 www kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 10000
May 12 22:21:43 www kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
May 12 22:21:43 www kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap ffffffff
May 12 22:21:43 www kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to 10000
May 12 22:21:44 www kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set xmit asyncmap 0
May 12 22:21:44 www kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f010003
May 12 22:21:44 www kernel: ppp_ioctl: set mru to 5dc
May 12 22:21:44 www kernel: ppp_tty_ioctl: set rcv asyncmap 0
May 12 22:21:44 www kernel: ppp_ioctl: set flags to f010003
May 12 22:22:15 www pppd[1509]: No response to PAP authenticate-requests
May 12 22:22:52 www kernel: ppp: channel ppp0 closing.
May 12 22:22:52 www pppd[1509]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
May 12 22:22:52 www pppd[1509]: Modem hangup
May 12 22:22:52 www pppd[1509]: Connection terminated.
May 12 22:22:52 www pppd[1509]: Connect time 1.2 minutes.
May 12 22:22:53 www pppd[1509]: Exit.
Pretty easy to see where its failing but how do i fix it. I can't find it
anywhere in my books/howtos anywhere also heres when im a user maybe you can
tell me why its even worse off
May 12 22:11:12 www pppd[1401]: pppd 2.3.7 started by mulder, uid 501
May 12 22:11:12 www pppd[1401]: Connect script failed
May 12 22:11:12 www pppd[1401]: Exit.
Any help at all is very much appreciated..
------------------------------
From: Azfar Kazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DHCP build concern
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 04:17:53 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks. Although I think the daemon will get started as soon as I build
it - so will I get any chance to change such confs?
Anyway, I will now probably test it out.
--
Azfar Kazmi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Frank Waarsenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just make sure that the IP addresses dispatched by the DHCP server do
not
> conflict with the existing static addresses. If you take care of that,
no
> conflicts will arise.
>
> Frank
>
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: "steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Howto/Documentation on Tunneling with 2.2.x ?
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 21:38:57 -0700
same here..
i am not able to find enough info to implement vpn with linux.
any help would be appreciated.
markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello,
> Since a few weeks i'm playing around with 2.2.x ( at the moment 2.2.7) to
get
> ipip tunneling working. I read the little FAQ included in the iproute2
> package, but since i am in no way expirienced with tunneling i have no
clue
> how to get it to work. I tried many things, combination; nothing worked.
It's
> also very hard because i couldnt find anu satisfying documentation about.
Can
> somone maybe point me to the right resource ? Or at least give me some
> examples how to set up ipip between two 2.2.7 machine (the one e.g.
> 192.168.10.1 and the other 192.168.9.1, and the ipip net 10.0.10.1 and
> 10.0.9.1) ?
>
> thanks in advice,
> Markus
> --
> (�- OpenSource
> //\ join the revolution
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> v_/_
http://drbrain.gegen.kindersex.de
> gib Krieg, Rassismus und Gewalt gegen Kinder keine
Chance
------------------------------
From: Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Usernet 'configuration'
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 20:45:19 -0400
I've tried this and get the same results as using Usernet - IE the
connection doesn't work ('Connect script failed' in log file). There's
something about issuing that pppd command that is supplying some option
that is not in the config files.
I'm just going to have to play around until I find it!
Thanks.
SH
Geoff Allsup wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 1999 23:49:43 -0400, Steve Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi there,
> >
> >I've (finally) got my PPP connection to my ISP working (RH5.2) -
> >hurrah! Unfortunately i have to type this huge command in to start the
> >connection every time :
> >
> >/usr/sbin/pppd /dev/modem 115200 debug user bk875 connect
> >"/usr/sbin/chat -v '' AT OK ATD5551234 CONNECT '\d\c'"
> >
> >I'd like to use the 'quick-n-easy' Usernet app to turn ppp on/off but
>
> have you tried /usr/sbin/usernetctl ppp0 up (or down) ?? Works for me.
>
> geoff
>
> --
> ******************************************************************
> Geoff Allsup Upper Ocean Processes Group
> Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole, MA, USA
> ******************************************************************
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: connection to Prodigy
Date: 13 May 1999 03:52:57 GMT
In article <7h78gs$4i8s$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
DOMINICK P PETRACCA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I am trying to connect my RedHat 5.2 machine to Prodigy. When I dial up, it
| is asking me for a Port Password. I called prodigy and all they could tell
| me was to not use PPP, but to use the "regular" way. Does anyone know what
| I can do or what they mean?
They don't even know what they mean... but the problem is that you have
an extra newline being sent to the port selector. Check your chat
script, after the CONNECT you want nothing. Particularly you want no
empty quotes ("") since that's the prompt for a password...
After that it's PPP and CHAP auth, although I long ago linked my
chap-secrets with pap-secrets to save effort. You probably want to use
'remotename' in your options script to match the name in your -secrets
file.
PI works very well with Linux, or you wouldn't be getting this ;-)
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
One common problem is mistyping an email address and creating another
valid, though unintended, recipient. Always check the recipient's
address carefully when sending personal information, such as credit
card numbers, death threats or offers of sexual services.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Walter Hunt)
Subject: Re: Is this possible? (VPN+IPMASQ)
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 04:46:34 GMT
One thing to keep in mind: If the VPN you want to use is based on the
AH protocol (Authentication Header), it will *not* work through the Linux
firewall. This is because that protocol puts a cryptographic signature around
the entire packet, which will fail when checked on the remote end if the
packet gets masqueraded.
This may not apply to you. It does apply to me. :-( It's not well
emphasized in the HOWTO you were pointed at.
(I have a plan/plot on how to make it work, but don't have the time or
energy right now to implement it. By the time I do, I won't need it anymore.)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeremy Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> My bad. I forgot to mention I was reading that one too... so are you saying
> that my scenario is possible then? I'm running 2.2.5 (RH6), do I still have to
> patch the kernel?
>
> thanks,
> jeremy
>
>
>
--
Walter Hunt
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: Re: IBM Token-Ring
Date: 13 May 1999 04:03:32 GMT
In article <7hc5b7$815$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Richard van Denzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I recently got Debian 1.3-1 installed on a PS/2 model 95. The only
| problem I got that I got stiuck with my TR card.
| It's an IBM Token-Ring 16/4 Adapter A, with io=0xa20 and irq=9.
| When I try to add the options to /etc/conf.modules it complains that
| there is no symbol for parameter irq was not found.
| When I don't specify the irq, there are repeated messages:
| first: tr0: Initial interrupt: shared RAM located at 00DC2D4
| repeated: tr0: Unrecoverable error: error code = 0011
| consequently the ifconfig command gets stuck.
To start with, I have a call to isapnp to configure the card(s), and
then insert the modules with io and irq specified. Works for me, I put
the isapnp call at the head of rc.modules in older Slackware, now it's
in some other rc file (rc.S??) in the 4.0 release. Don't know where the
right place in Debian might be, but this method works just fine.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
One common problem is mistyping an email address and creating another
valid, though unintended, recipient. Always check the recipient's
address carefully when sending personal information, such as credit
card numbers, death threats or offers of sexual services.
------------------------------
From: Azfar Kazmi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Reboot linux 5.2 box from telnet connection
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 04:42:40 GMT
> > BTW I cannot log onto
> >the linux box as root but must su to root.
You can only logon as root to the terminals defined in /etc/securetty.
Add a couple of pttys [e.g. ttyp1, ttyp2, etc.] and then you would be
able to logon as root through telnet. BUT you must be aware of its
security implications.
--
Azfar Kazmi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill davidsen)
Subject: Re: serial networks
Date: 13 May 1999 04:11:48 GMT
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Nick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Can anyone help me in trying to set up a serial cable network? I know
| it is used very commonly to link Unix servers to dumb terminals, and I
| would like to try it at home with three Linux machines.
Two cables, two null modem adaptors, an evening reading the pppd man
page... poof, you have the network. You have to make a router table
entry for the "middle" machine, or use a triangle connection with every
machine cabled to every other.
Either:
[A]<==>[B]<==>[C]
Or:
[A]<==>[C]
\\ //
\\ //
[B]
Obviously having a middle machine means A and C will not talk if B is
down, but it's fewer cables, etc.
--
bill davidsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
One common problem is mistyping an email address and creating another
valid, though unintended, recipient. Always check the recipient's
address carefully when sending personal information, such as credit
card numbers, death threats or offers of sexual services.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
