Linux-Networking Digest #157, Volume #11 Fri, 14 May 99 17:13:44 EDT
Contents:
IPX/PPP Problem ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: SuSe 6.0 + 2.2.5 = No network! ("David Murray")
Diald dials but no PPP? (MikeVW)
Masquarading X sessions? ("Dr. Yuan Liu")
Re: Ethernet Woes ("David Means")
Re: Masq. Problem ("Greg")
can't locate module ppp-compress-21 ("Eriksson")
Re: newbie-to-lan: cannot ping other box ("Curt")
Re: get client machine's IP-address (Lew Pitcher)
IDENTD Problems... (Ross Bigelow)
Null Cable For Ethernet (mike)
TN3270E on Linux? ("Jeff Hall")
Re: PPP with Redhat 5.2 ("Andrew Sayers")
Re: PCI Modem - lost cause? (M. Buchenrieder)
Question about Masqu. ("Dirk Lamar")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: IPX/PPP Problem
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 17:01:32 GMT
I have a Linux machine (P133, 98M ram, 4Gig hard
drive) using RedHat 5.0 kernel build 2.0.36.
I rebuilt the kernel for PPP & IPX support, fired it up and
dialed in. I have got TCP/IP working without any problems or errors
and
I can 'surf' the net with Netscape no problem.
I added the lines :
Ipxcp-accept-network
Ipxcp-accept-remote
Ipxcp-accept-local
To my options file and pppd fell over complaining that
it did not know what they were. I downloaded the latest 'ppp' from the
RedHat Web site and installed it.
PPPD stopped complaining about the 'ipxcp' commands.
I enter the command 'ipx_interface add -p ppp0 802.2' there was
no error
Ifconfig tells me that there is an IPX protocol on ppp0 - but no
node address.
When I do slist I get the error 'no server found in ncp_open'
I thought that this may have implied that it had not seen an IPX
packet over the link as yet so it could not allocate a network number
so
I left it running for about 4 hours only to get the same error from
slist, same response from ifconfig.
After reading every HOWTO, FAQ and Web search I can I am at a
dead end.
BTW: I run both computers (The server I am dialing into and the client
I am using to dial in).
I have tried the latest experimental kernel with no luck
either.(2.1.132)
Thank You,
William
------------------------------
From: "David Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SuSe 6.0 + 2.2.5 = No network!
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 17:20:25 GMT
There are a variety of possibilities here.. First of all, are you compiling
your network card driver as a module or part of the kernel? If you are
making it as a module, a common thing is to forget to run
make modules
make modules_install
after compiling the kernel.. This will install the newly compiled network
modules in their proper places and set them up. If this isn't the problem,
run ifconfig and look at the functioning network devices. Does your
network card show up? If not, try these commands:
ifconfig eth0 up
ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 (or any old IP address you like)
See what happens. If that is working, check your routing table.. use the
route command to see what the table looks like.. you might need to run a
command like:
route add default gw 192.168.0.1 (or whatever the IP of your NIC is)
yes, this should all be automatically setup, but if it isn't this will get
it going until you figure out why it isn't automatic.
> I have a well-functioning SuSE 6.0 setup, which uses the 2.0.36
> kernel. I downloaded the 2.2.5 sources from SuSE and compiled
> them, and it runs fine *except* that all network operations fail with
> "Network Unreachable".
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MikeVW)
Subject: Diald dials but no PPP?
Date: 14 May 1999 20:05:45 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Trying to prevent arterial clogging of my CPU from eating too much spam!
Change the spam in my address to spring to reply. Stop the inspamity!
Visit my website www.mindspring.com/~us015148
This is a Microsoft Free message.
.........
`:::' ....... ......
::: * `::. ::'
::: .:: .:.::. .:: .:: `::. :'
::: :: :: :: :: :: .::.
::: .::. .:: ::. `::::. .:' ::.
...:::.....................::' .::::..
The choice of a GNU generation
UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.
------------------------------
From: "Dr. Yuan Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Masquarading X sessions?
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 18:56:46 GMT
I use a masquarading Linux at my Internet connection. How can I get X
servers behind the firewall to receive display? I tried setting
$DISPLAY to the firewall, it won't work. Set it to any internal names
(or IPs, I use private IPs), the client couldn't recognize it.
Another test I made was with the routing on the other side of the
firewall. I set a static route to my private IP. But the machine still
attempts to route packets to default gateway.
--
+--- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------- http://www.ChiTech.ca/ ---+
| Dr. Yuan LIU - Chitech Technologies Inc. |
+------- (514)281-0494 ------------------ FAX (514)281-0493 ------+
------------------------------
From: "David Means" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,uk.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Ethernet Woes
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 13:08:38 -0700
Ben Whalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
You may already have tried several of these things, but if not, one
of them may help things get going.
1. Make SURE that the Tx and Rx pins are connected by twisted
pairs. The best way to do this is by visual inspection: if the cable is
made using (US) standard color coding, then pins 1&2 should have
white/green and green/white wires attached to them on one end, and
white/orange and orange/white wires at the other end. Similarly, pins
3&6 should have white/orange and orange/white at one end, and white/green
and green/white wires at the other end. If this is not so, then in the
words
of Jean-Luc Picard, "Make it so." This is my best guess at the problem,
on account of the Tx errors you report.
2. You still need to have routes in both route tables, even if you are
only
connecting 2 computers. Using the command #netstat -rn, verify that
you have a line like this on each system:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS window
irtt Iface
192.168.134.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 1500 0
0 eth0
> [... snip]
> Here is the basic setup that i have got as far as the ethernet is
> concerned :
>
> I have two PCs which i am trying to connect, Revelstone (IP address
> 192.168.134.2) and anna (192.168.134.1) both part of the network
> .ambernet ie. revelstone.ambernet and anna.ambernet.
>
> I have two, 3com 3c509b ISA 10base-T Etherlink-III cards, one in each PC
> with a patch cable linking them. I am not using a hub etc since i only
> want to connect the two PCs via a twisted pair patch cable.
>
> I purchased a pre-assembled patch cable, the integrity of which i
> verified vs. the directions in the Linux Ethernet-HOWTO and the cable is
> fine.
>
> Both PCs are currently running Redhat Linux 5.1, kernel ver 2.2.7.
>
> The ethernet cards are plug'n play disabled (using the 3com pnpdsabl
> utility) and at boot time show up as the correct card ID (the driver is
> monolithically compiled into the kernel, i am not using modules). They
> both show as :
>
> irq : 10 i/o addr : 0x300
>
> which is the correct default for the 3c509b and after doing a 'cat
> /proc/interrupts' there is no irq conflict at irq 10, although i am not
> sure if the i/o addr is ok. I think it is, since an ifconfig gives the
> card the right inet address etc which i assume would not work if the i/o
> addr was wrong.
>
> The built-in LEDs on the cards which, according to the manual, go off if
> the card is faulty, or if the wiring is faulty are fine, they stay on
> all the time. The cards respond, as i used Donald Becker's 3c5x9setup
> util to try changing the programmed irq on one of the cards, and this
> worked, so revelstone's eth0 card now has an irq of 7, which again
> doesn't conflict with anything else.
>
> The only command being issued to the card to setup the interface is :
>
> /sbin/ifconfig eth0 inet 192.168.134.2
>
> which then gives me the folowing output from ifconfig :
>
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
> RX packets:115 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:0 errors:12535 dropped:115 overruns:0
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:04:32:24:8E
> inet addr:192.168.134.2 Bcast:192.168.134.255
> Mask:255.255.255.0
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
> TX packets:0 errors:1494 dropped:15 overruns:0
> Interrupt:7 Base address:0x300
>
>
> which shows the right inet address, correct irq and i/o address.
>
> Anna (the other PC) is configured in the the same way, and gives the
> same response, albeit with a different inet address (obviously). I get
> these TX errors in the ifconfig output and get no response from 'ping'
> or telnet from either host.
>
> I have previously been running a PPP link via a null modem cable between
> these two PCs with no problems, so the name resolution etc is, AFAIK ok,
> but the ethernet just wont work :(
>
> I have waded through the Ethernet-HOWTO and am sure that the cards are
> ok, i have checked the patch cable with a meter and that's fine, so what
> gives ?
>
> I don't need any routing since i only have to worry about comunication
> between two hosts, so i cannot fathom what the problem is.
> /var/log/messages gives no indication of any problems with either the
> driver loading at boot time, and there is no SIO##### error messaging
> with the ifconfig command etc.
>
> I am basically stumped as to why i cant get a connection here....anyone,
> any ideas at all !!!! PLEASE !
>
> Ben
>
>
> --
> This fortune would be seven words long if it were six words shorter.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: "Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Masq. Problem
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 13:25:55 -0400
Type modprobe -l and you should see something like.
/lib/modules/2.0.36/ipv4/ip_masq_ftp.o
/lib/modules/2.0.36/ipv4/ip_masq_irc.o
Have you done the, make modules , make modules_install ?
This maybe the problem I'm willing to bet it is trying to return the
directory list to the default ip of the box doing the ftp which may
give you a port error and not give a directory list.
Just a rookie myself, but this may stir up a better answer . :)
Greg.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>When using the following command :
>(sbin/ipfwadm -F -a accept -m $INET -P tcp -S 172.19.12.89/32 -D $ANY
>ftp) I can masq. to a remote site and login fine, but when the FTP
>program tries to retrieve a directory listing a get a DoDirList(0)
>error? Any ideas? I only want to Masq. the FTP protocol Redhat Linux
>5.0 kernel 2.0.36 If I remove the word ftp from the end of the command
>(which means allow all tcp stuff) then it works fine. However I do not
>want the client machine to have that ability.
>
>Thank You,
>William
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.linux.slackware
Subject: can't locate module ppp-compress-21
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 22:28:14 +0200
I'm having troubles with my PPP script again.
This time it might be that "can't locate module ppp-compress-21" error I
get just before I'm assigned an IP address from my ISP.
How can I fix that?
Slackware 3.6
Kernel 2.2.4
Many thx!
/Martin
------------------------------
Reply-To: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Curt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: newbie-to-lan: cannot ping other box
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 13:05:42 -0500
Only thing I can suggest now is to try some of the other ne2000 setup
programs and see if they work
for you card. You might start at ftp://ftp.linksys.com/pub/network.
ether16.exe might work.
hazzmat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hello again, here is dmesg output. Changed irq to 11 --still no
blinking on
> > the hub. Thanks for all the thought you've been putting in toward this.
I
> > downloaded kernel 2.2.9 last night because I saw something that said it
had
> > better support for ne clones like mine, and I botched the install
somehow.
> > Anyway, there is a reference to irq's on ide1 in the body of this output
but
> > I have no idea what it means.
> > Linux version 2.2.5-15 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
> > egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #1 Mon Apr 19 22:21:09
EDT
> > 1999
> > Detected 350803218 Hz processor.
> > Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
> > Calibrating delay loop... 699.60 BogoMIPS
> > Memory: 127972k/131008k available (996k kernel code, 412k reserved,
1568k
> > data, 60k init)
> > VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.4.0 initialized
> > CPU: AMD AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor stepping 00
> > Checking 386/387 coupling... OK, FPU using exception 16 error reporting.
> > Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
> > POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
> > PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfb2f0
> > PCI: Using configuration type 1
> > PCI: Probing PCI hardware
> > PCI: 00:38 [1106/0586]: Work around ISA DMA hangs (00)
> > Activating ISA DMA hang workarounds.
> > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2
> > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
> > NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for Linux NET4.0.
> > NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
> > IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
> > Initializing RT netlink socket
> > Starting kswapd v 1.5
> >
> > Detected PS/2 Mouse Port.
> > Serial driver version 4.27 with MANY_PORTS MULTIPORT SHARE_IRQ enabled
> > ttyS02 at 0x03e8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
> > ttyS03 at 0x02e8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
> > pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured
> > apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x07 (Driver version 1.9)
> > Real Time Clock Driver v1.09
> > RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size
> > VP_IDE: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
> > VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> > ide0: BM-DMA at 0xe000-0xe007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA
> > ide1: BM-DMA at 0xe008-0xe00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:DMA
> > hda: WDC AC26400B, ATA DISK drive
> > hdb: WDC AC35100L, ATA DISK drive
> > hdc: ATAPI CD-ROM DRIVE 32X MAXIMUM, ATAPI CDROM drive
> > hdd: IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI Floppy, ATAPI FLOPPY drive
> > ide2: ports already in use, skipping probe
> > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> > ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> > hda: WDC AC26400B, 6149MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=784/255/63
> > hdb: WDC AC35100L, 4924MB w/256kB Cache, CHS=627/255/63
> > hdc: ATAPI 27X CD-ROM drive, 120kB Cache
> > Uniform CDROM driver Revision: 2.54
> > Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
> >
> > FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077
> > md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MAX_REAL=12
> > raid5: measuring checksumming speed
> > raid5: using high-speed MMX checksum routine
> > pII_mmx : 753.999 MB/sec
> > p5_mmx : 673.989 MB/sec
> > 8regs : 515.493 MB/sec
> > 32regs : 369.189 MB/sec
> > using fastest function: pII_mmx (753.999 MB/sec)
> > scsi : 0 hosts.
> > scsi : detected total.
> > md.c: sizeof(mdp_super_t) = 4096
> > Partition check:
> > hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 hda6 hda7 >
> > hdb:
> > autodetecting RAID arrays
> > autorun ...
> > ... autorun DONE.
> > VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
> > Freeing unused kernel memory: 60k freed
> > Adding Swap: 72256k swap-space (priority -1)
> > Soundblaster audio driver Copyright (C) by Hannu Savolainen 1993-1996
> > SB 4.16 detected OK (220)
> > <SoundBlaster EMU8000 (RAM512k)>
> > ne.c:v1.10 9/23/94 Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > NE*000 ethercard probe at 0x300: 00 40 95 76 f2 07
> > eth0: NE2000 found at 0x300, using IRQ 11.
> > Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> > nfsd_init: initialized fhcache, entries=256
> > CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California
> > PPP: version 2.3.3 (demand dialling)
> > PPP line discipline registered.
> > registered device ppp0
> > Try IRQ 11. Since it seems to be finding the card a 0x300, I assume that
is
> > correct. But, you might take a look
> > /proc/ioports to see if there is a possible overlap. Also post output
of
> > dmesg if you can.
> >
> > hazzmat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > Curt wrote:
> > >
> > > > Do you recall what IRQ it used under 5.1, mostly likely that will
work
> > > > again.
> > > > I doubt if it was IRQ 9. Try setting the following in
/etc/conf.modules
> > > >
> > > > alias eth0 ne
> > > > options ne io=0x300 irq=10
> > > >
> > >
> > > Seems to be doing the same at irq10 and 7 as it was at 9. I can ping
> > > 192.168.1.1 --but nothing else.
> > > INKY /root]# cat /proc/interrupts
> > > CPU0
> > > 0: 77288 XT-PIC timer
> > > 1: 797 XT-PIC keyboard
> > > 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> > > 4: 32691 XT-PIC serial
> > > 5: 68539 XT-PIC soundblaster
> > > 7: 0 XT-PIC NE2000
> > > 8: 2 XT-PIC rtc
> > > 12: 27308 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse
> > > 13: 1 XT-PIC fpu
> > > 14: 101342 XT-PIC ide0
> > > 15: 25 XT-PIC ide1
> > > NMI: 0
> > > [root@BLINKY /root]# ping 192.168.1.2
> > > PING 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes
> > >
> > > --- 192.168.1.2 ping statistics ---
> > > 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
> > >
> > > I don't know what irq # it used to work at --it was about a year ago
that
> > it
> > > was setup that way. 5.1 was installed to my box through the card at a
> > Linux
> > > friendly store. I never actually needed the card 'til now.
> > >
> > > I edited conf.modules like you suggested and I removed the
pre-existing
> > eth0
> > > reference
> > > so that it now looks like this:
> > >
> > > alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
> > > pre-install pcmcia_core /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcmcia start
> > > alias sound sb
> > > pre-install sound insmod sound dmabuf=1
> > > options opl3 io=0x388
> > > alias midi awe_wave
> > > post-install awe_wave /bin/sfxload /etc/midi/GU11-ROM.SF2
> > > options sb dma16=5 io=0x220 mpu_io=0x330 irq=5 dma=1
> > > alias eth0 ne
> > > options ne io=0x300 irq=7
> > > (also tried irq10 first)
> > >
> > > I am rebooting between changes because I noticed that the address in
> > > /proc/interrupts wasn't changing along with changes to conf.modules
even
> > though
> > > I restarted the kernel daemon (hit the button for it) through
kernelcfg.
> > Also I
> > > am checking to make sure these Irq's are not turned off in the BIOS
(10
> > was
> > > disabled, but I turned it on to 'primary' before trying)
> > > When I attempt to ping the G3 the LED on the hub should blink some
right?
> > Any
> > > other configuration files that I need to know about --like routing
stuff?
> > >
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lew Pitcher)
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.programming,comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: get client machine's IP-address
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 18:07:48 GMT
I'm in a telnet session to my unix host (Linux, if it makes a difference),
and I enter the "who am i" command. My unix host replies with
srdscs05!pitchl ttyp1 May 14 13:03 (49.21.20.105)
and I note that the IP address in parenthesis is the IP address of my
Windows NT client machine (from which I telnet to unix).
OK, how does 'who' determine that IP address? Could that technique
(what ever it is) be used to answer this thread's original question?
On Fri, 14 May 1999 18:13:49 +0200, Iond Research Srl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark Hahn wrote:
>
>> getpeername. this would be obvious if you had read even basic
>> network programming books.
>
>Thanks Mark for your answer, but I'm not sure getpeername can solve my
>problem.
>
>I'll try to explain myself better with an example:
>
>You are connected from a linux machine (client) to a solaris machine
>(server) with
>a telnet session during which you want to execute this c-program
>(complex.c)
>
>main()
>{
> printf("Hi, Mark\n");
>/* Now I wish to know the IP-address of the machine on which
> the string "Hi, Mark" is displayed"
> */
>}
>
>This program runs in the server but thru the pseudo-tty its output is
>displayed
>at the client machine.
>
>No sockets are used so we haven't the first arg to pass to the
>getpeername.
>
>You can try to pass 0 as socket-fd to getpeername but it returns the
>local-host
>IP-address (127.0.0.1).
>
>So what's the matter ?
>
>Maybe work around the slave part of the pseudo-tty ?
>
>Sorry for this silly question but I'm not a network programmer, really
>this is
>my first networking problem, and also reading Stevens' I haven't yet
>found a
>solution.
>
>Anyway, thanks a lot
>
>Lucio
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Lew Pitcher
System Consultant, Integration Solutions Architecture
Toronto Dominion Bank
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(Opinions expressed are my own, not my employer's.)
------------------------------
From: Ross Bigelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions,de.comp.os.linux.networking
Subject: IDENTD Problems...
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 13:57:03 GMT
Could anyone out there please tell me why my identd server (on a Slack
3.6/35 box)
appears to be running fine, but doesn't send out proper replies to get
onto any EFNet
and most other networks IRC servers? I've tried the standard ident,
cident, jidentd
and mident... But no matter what, the IRC servers give me a "You are
not authorized
to use this server" blah blah blah, because there is no, or an improper
ident response.
I'd like to have this work over the entire network (to masq'd 95/NT
machines), but
right now I'd even be happy with it working on the linux box (live
internet)...
Any help would be greatly appreciated... Thanks!
Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Null Cable For Ethernet
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 03:06:55 -0400
I have heard that one can modify a standard twisted pair ethernet
cable to allow two computers to connect with each other without
using a hub. Can one purchase such a cable. Is a " patch cable "
such a cable?
Mike
------------------------------
From: "Jeff Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: TN3270E on Linux?
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 15:30:38 -0500
Hi,
I am a newbie to Linux. I am running Redhat Linux 6.0. Does anyone know if
there are any TN3270E emulators available for Linux besides the X3270.rpm
that comes with the Redhat Distribution. Specifically, I looking for an
emulator that can establish print sessions to an IBM mainframe.
Thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Andrew Sayers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP with Redhat 5.2
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 21:27:38 +0100
I had the same problem, and it turned out that my /etc/hosts file was
causing my computer to register at the ISP using my local IP number.
If your config looks something like this:
127.0.0.1 localhost
a.b.c.d mycomp
Try changing it to:
127.0.0.1 localhost mycomp
Hope that helps,
- Andrew Sayers
------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (M. Buchenrieder)
Subject: Re: PCI Modem - lost cause?
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 12:07:30 GMT
michael sulis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hey there, just installed Redhat 5.1, no real troubles except for the
>modem...
>it's a 56K v.90 PCI modem, and it has no UART
[...]
WinModem junk. Throw it away and buy a nice external modem.
Michael
--
Michael Buchenrieder * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.muc.de/~mibu
Lumber Cartel Unit #456 (TINLC) & Official Netscum
Note: If you want me to send you email, don't munge your address.
------------------------------
From: "Dirk Lamar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Question about Masqu.
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 19:21:16 +0200
Hi ,
I want to use masq. under suse linux 6.1 to get my 2 win computers with one
ip into the internet ! there is only one prob my provider stryctly forbidd
masqu. !
My question is now ist there a possibillity for the net admin to view wether
im using masq. ?? and if he can see how can can i change it ??
Waiting for your reply
thank u
Dirk Lamar
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
