Linux-Networking Digest #159, Volume #11 Fri, 14 May 99 21:13:41 EDT
Contents:
Re: Setting up a Linux-box as a Router (Friedrich Kirsch)
Simple Daemon Question & DHCP ("magnet")
Re: newbie: set irq for eth0? ("Bernat Ginard Llad�")
Re: Help me...I've been hacked! (Paul D. Smith)
Re: how to > network to internet (Braxton Burrsaddle)
NFS service not responding ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: urge conectar 2 pc�s en red (Orfeu)
Re: 10Base2 Connector/Cable Quality (Viau)
Re: PPP with Redhat 5.2 ("Greg")
Re: dos =?iso-8859-1?Q?PC=B4s_en_red,_=BFcomo=3F?= (thoth)
Re: Troubles connecting Linux to NT Server with DHCP. (thoth)
Diald dials but no PPP? (MikeVW)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Friedrich Kirsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Setting up a Linux-box as a Router
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 00:22:58 +0100
Hi Clifford:
Sorry for confusing things. It wasn't ment that way. I didn't want to make anybody
upset ether. The configuration is like this:
Internet Gateway <--> 192.168.3.0 <--> Gateway <--> 192.168.4.0
The "Internet Gateway" (192.168.3.101) is configured with IP-Masquerading,
working fine with the net 192.168.3.101.
The "Gateway" has two Interfaces (192.168.3.163 and 192.168.4.129).
What I want to do: Add network 192.168.4.0 to the existing Configuration, so that
any host in it can talk to 192.168.3.0 and to the Internet also.
Now, me don't know nothing about routing, that's why I'm asking. The routing-table
I
send is something I just tried. I actually don't know which routes I need, to make
the thing work.
I put Broadcast-routes and mulicast-Routes just to try, if it might work. If you
know,
how the routingtable has to look like when you type "route -n" (forget about
route.conf), I would
be very glad, if you could tell me...
route.conf is a configuration file, that is read by /sbin/init.d/route at startup
in SuSE-Distributions.
witch at some point calls /sbin/route.
Thanks for helping,
Friedrich
> There are some things here that I don't know about. The Io interface is
> one, the broadcast-like host addresses 192.168.4.255 and 192.168.3.255 are
> another, and the 224.0.0.0 network routes to eth0 and eth1 with 240.0.0.0
> masks still another. I really don't understand the default route either,
> the one with IP 192.168.3.101 which you say is an Internet gateway.
> And is route.conf indigious to SUSE? I've not see such a configuration
> file before although I would guess that it's probably a boot-up file
> used in SUSE distributions.
>
> My concept of what you had was this:
>
> LAN A <--> LANs' Gateway <--> LAN B
>
> Still, the ethernet LANs should be able to talk to each other - provided
> every box on the LANs, other than the gateway, has a network route to it's
> network and it's default gateway pointed at the LANs' gateway. This is
> *not* the Internet gateway, which you didn't mention in your first post.
>
> BTW the only way a reserved IP box could be an Internet gateway is for it
> to be dual-homed with a routeable IP and use NAT, or the Linux many-to-one
> variety of NAT called IP-masquerading. You can't get to the internet
> from reserved address networks without that or something very similar.
> No offense if you know all this, I'm just confused as to what's what here.
>
> : Clifford Kite schrieb:
>
> : > Friedrich Kirsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> : > : I have two subnets 195.168.3.0 und 195.168.4.0 und one Linux-box with
> : > : two Network-Cards. I'd like to use the Linuxbox as a router between the
> : > : two nets, without writing routingtables (except Default-gateway) for
> : > : each host. Is it possible to set up the routing with static routes just
> : > : on the router? Do I have to use "gated" or "routed"?
> : >
> : > You can configure the default gateway for all the LAN boxen to point to
> : > the gateway box. The gateway kernel needs IP forwarding compiled into
> : > it and turned on with "echo -n 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward" . You
> : > need specific network routes on each box for the LAN that the box is
> : > attached to. I *think* that's all that is needed provided that these
> : > two LANs are the only ones that you have.
> : >
>
> --
> Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
> /* Those who can't write, write manuals. */
------------------------------
From: "magnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Simple Daemon Question & DHCP
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 15:15:06 -0600
I compiled DHCPD on a RH6 box, it is working perfectly but I have one small
problem:
I have to run dhcpd in a XWindows terminal if I want to do other stuff while
it is running. How can I automatically run it as a ?Daemon? on bootup?
Where should I put the command line?
------------------------------
From: "Bernat Ginard Llad�" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: newbie: set irq for eth0?
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 17:31:29 +0100
donnell wrote:
> new to linux running redhat 5.2 k2.0.36 on an i486
> I want to change my ethernet card to irq 10, I have set the cards eeprom to
> use 10, now I need to configure it in redhat. I was previously using irq 3
> but wanted to free irq 3 for an old modem I have. I've tried setting the irq
> to 10 using the linuxconf under basic host information but the system
> doesn't recognize the change when I reset the irq value to 10. It still
> wants to use 3 after usng the accept button. What file(s) can I edit
> manually to reset this value?
If the driver is compiled in the kernel set in the lilo.conf the irq with the
line append="irq=10� or if it is load as a module load it with the option
irq=10
--
_______________________________________________________
Bernat Ginard Llad�
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul D. Smith)
Subject: Re: Help me...I've been hacked!
Date: 14 May 1999 18:36:30 -0400
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
%% [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> The license on the RSAREF library, for example, doesn't allow sale of
>> either applications _or_ services based on RSAREF applications.
wx> Not true. With regards to services:
wx> [...]
>> So, RedHat can't include it on a CD,
wx> Not true.
wx> [...]
>> you can't use it as a contractor to connect to your clients, etc.
wx> Not true.
wx> [...]
I'm talking about the restrictions on _RSAREF_ and you're rebutting me
with quotes from the SSH1 license. I make none of the above claims
about SSH1, except insofar as it uses the RSA technology, which is
patented in the U.S.A.
That is, all the quoted passages in the SSH1 license are true outside
the U.S.A. Inside the U.S.A., you must also comply with the patents on
RSA in addition to the licensing on SSH1. That is a completely separate
thing; since SSH1 has not paid RSA Data Security (or whomever) for use
of the patented technology, the only way it can be used (that I can
see), is via the RSA "free license" on the RSAREF library. That is not
quite as forgiving as the SSH1 license.
Someone please correct me if I'm mistaken on this...
>> I'm trying to point out you're being unclear in your advice. When you
>> say "ssh" most people will go get the latest version.
wx> I imagine you were talking about ssh2 when you made the above claims,
wx> and were simply being unclear in your advice. When you say "ssh" most
wx> sysadmins will assume you mean the version that actually works [ssh1].
wx> :)
:)
The point is, people who know enough to know that (a) ssh1 works and
ssh2 doesn't, that (b) they are completely different packages, (c)
they're not backward-compatible, etc. probably don't need to be told
they should be using it :)
--
===============================================================================
Paul D. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Network Management Development
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
===============================================================================
These are my opinions---Nortel Networks takes no responsibility for them.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Braxton Burrsaddle)
Subject: Re: how to > network to internet
Date: 14 May 1999 22:48:05 GMT
On Fri, 14 May 1999 12:28:14, "Martin Haaksema"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> say:
> I have a local LAN (IP) an one internet account.
> I'd like to connect all my LAN PC's to the internet via LINUX
> Is it possible? and can I use my LINUX machine as an EMAIL server (batched
> POP / SMTP)
Yes to all the above. It is possible to, e.g. have any of the network
systems make the linux box dial, serve web traffic and so on.
Fetchmail + sendmail is what we use to get office email.
> What should I do? Thanks in advance
Assuming all your network connections are up and running, I'd start
with a decision about how you will maintain addresses; if via DNS see
the DNS HOWTO and the O'Reilly book "DNS and BIND".
Next, get familiar with the Linux box and close as many ports as you
can. I speak from experience: our old box got hacked over a port we
never used, and it led to loss of our entire /usr directory.
Get masquerading working, using the "IP-Masquerade" mini-howto and the
load of information you can find about ipfwadm.
HTH
Greg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : reply-to bogus, remove z's to construct email
address.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NFS service not responding
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 22:51:46 GMT
Just upgraded from RH5.2 to RH6.0. When trying to remount an exported
directory on Linux with a SunOS 5.6 machine I now get "NFS service not
responding". Why did it quit working??
ping works
host <hostname> works
host <ip_addr> works
telnet works
SAMBA now works with NT (Didn't have time to get it working on 5.2
before upgrading)
The answer is probably right in front of me and I don't know it. I only
have ~ one month of intense Linux/UNIX experience, but I HAVE to get
some work done.
Thanks for any suggestions.
# cat exports
/mnt/xxxx_gb_1 bell.xxxx.xxx(rw,no_root_squash,insecure)
# rpcinfo -p gxxxx
program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 rpcbind
100000 2 udp 111 rpcbind
100024 1 udp 632 status
100024 1 tcp 634 status
100011 1 udp 643 rquotad
100011 2 udp 643 rquotad
100005 1 udp 653 mountd
100005 1 tcp 655 mountd
100005 2 udp 658 mountd
100005 2 tcp 660 mountd
100005 3 udp 663 mountd
100005 3 tcp 665 mountd
100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
100021 1 udp 1265 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 1265 nlockmgr
100021 1 tcp 1063 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 1063 nlockmgr
[
# chkconfig --list
httpd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
atd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
named 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
gpm 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:on 5:off 6:off
network 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
innd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
random 0:off 1:on 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
nfs 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:on 5:off 6:off
keytable 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
pcmcia 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
linuxconf 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
lpd 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
mars-nwe 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
inet 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
portmap 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
postgresql 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
routed 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
rstatd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
rusersd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
rwhod 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
smb 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
sendmail 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
syslog 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
snmpd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
crond 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
xfs 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
ypbind 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off
apmd 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
netfs 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off
L
# cat hosts.allow
# hosts.allow This file describes the names of the hosts which are
# allowed to use the local INET services, as decided
# by the '/usr/sbin/tcpd' server.
ALL:bell.xxxx.xxx
###This is the only machine that needs to see this machine!
# cat hosts.deny
# hosts.deny This file describes the names of the hosts which are
# *not* allowed to use the local INET services, as decided
# by the '/usr/sbin/tcpd' server.
# The portmap line is redundant, but it is left to remind you that
# the new secure portmap uses hosts.deny and hosts.allow. In particular
# you should know that NFS uses portmap!
ALL:ALL
nfsstat
/proc/net/rpc/nfs: No such file or directory
host bell
bell.xxxx.xxx has address xxx.xxx.xx.4
host xxx.xxx.xx.4
4.xx.xxx.xxx.IN-ADDR.ARPA domain name pointer bell.xxxx.xxx
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Orfeu)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,
Subject: Re: urge conectar 2 pc�s en red
Date: 14 May 1999 23:06:29 GMT
Reply-To: address_below
If you need help connecting your laptop to your sobremesa(?) computer by
ethernet targetas (?), you would have had a bigger chance posting your message
with english translations for the essential terms in your message!
que estoy haciendo mal?
we do not know because you do not tell WHAT you HAVE done
Orf B
In article <01be9e1e$4aee6ee0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"mary" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> necesito un poco de ayuda para conectar mi portatil al ordenador de
> sobremesa a traves de targetas de red ethernet, llevo varios dias
� skip �
------------------------------
From: Viau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 10Base2 Connector/Cable Quality
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 19:39:58 -0400
Well, I'm just starting myself as well, but I've some good stuff, links at
www.timhiggins.com as well as some info on HOW-TO sections in the book "Complete
Idiot's guide to Linux".
By the way, in the interim if you hear about any other info related to your
setup I'd appreciate you dropping me a line as I'm doing a similar setup with 2
Pcs and a cable modem from Videotron.
Stephan.
Josh wrote:
> This is something I was also planning to do in the (hopefully) not so far
> off future. I've just started playing with Linux, and I haven't done any
> networking, so I still need a lot of info. I hate it when people just flat
> out ask for all the info they need, step by step, and don't try things on
> their own first, so I do plan on looking for the info myself. But I was
> hoping I could get pointed in the right direction to things like background
> info, FAQs, or anything else that might come in handy. What I hope to end up
> accomplishing is a two computer network, with Linux hooked up to the Net
> (DSL hopefully), possibly running a small web server with my personal stuff,
> and shared Net access with the other computer (Windows).
>
> So, if anyone can offer any advice or a good starting point for info, please
> let me know.
>
> thanks,
> Josh
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Glenn Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi all - I realise this isn't the most appropriate newsgroup for this
> > question, but anyway....I will soon be setting up a small network at
> > home.
------------------------------
From: "Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PPP with Redhat 5.2
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 19:39:28 -0400
"Network unreachable" sounds like a routing problem, the pppX
interface should become the default route i.e. out that port.
If your using a ethernet card it "should" override the default
route for it, or at least the the ips in your subnet should just
go out the ethX port and anything else out the pppX port.
type: route at your prompt and you should get the picture.
also ifconfig you should see how many packets went out where.
Hope this helps more detail will get you further.
Greg
W Gemini wrote in message <7hhu5e$rfl$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Hi:
> After I connect to the internet using PPP. I can't go anywhere beyond
>my ISP server (alcor.concordia.ca). I always get a "Network unreachable"
>error. However, I can go to alcor.concordia.ca without problem. Could
>somebody help please?
>
>Liu Liu
>
>
------------------------------
From: thoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,es.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: dos =?iso-8859-1?Q?PC=B4s_en_red,_=BFcomo=3F?=
Date: 14 May 1999 23:34:55 GMT
In article <01be9e1c$dd7a3840$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mary wrote:
>el portatil podria llevar la dir:
>mary.mierda.net
>
> ip: 125.1.3.88
> masc:255.0.0.0
> gw:125.1.0.222
�No puedes utilizar direcciones privadas?
Tipo 192.168.x.x
Asi poses el netmask a 255.255.0.0
>y el otro:
>rotxa.mierda.net
>
> ip: 125.1.5.0
> masc:255.0.0.0
> gw:125.1.0.222
>
Con una direccion ip tipo x.x.x.0 no te funcionara en la vida, las
direcciones de este tipo son direcciones de red, o sea representan
una red entera.
Ponle otra tipo x.x.x.n donde n vale entre 1 y 254
Espero que te valga, si no te pongo mi /etc/init.d/network, que
ademas es el generico de debian, logicamente funciona.
--
Linux User 90535
Usando kernel 2.2.7 En Linux/GNU Debian 2.1
Todos contra los monopolios (T$ y M$).
=========================================
------------------------------
From: thoth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,es.comp.os.linux
Subject: Re: Troubles connecting Linux to NT Server with DHCP.
Date: 15 May 1999 00:05:59 GMT
In article <01be9e20$3ba28000$1d00000a@jorge>, Jorge wrote:
Usa tu WinNT WINS para resolver los nombres o DNS.
Si es DNS configura tu servidor de nombres del NT correctamente.
Si es WINS, prueba a usar un sambaclient.
>Jorge M�ndez
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Linux User 90535
Usando kernel 2.2.7 En Linux/GNU Debian 2.1
Todos contra los monopolios (T$ y M$).
=========================================
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MikeVW)
Subject: Diald dials but no PPP?
Date: 15 May 1999 00:13:12 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK this is really pissing me off. All I want to do is let my little
seti@home proggie run and be able to connect to the net to upload and
download its data even when I'm not around. Diald is what I need.
Download the two rpms:
diald16-0.16.5a-2.i386.rpm diald16-config-0.16.5a-2.i386.rpm
Installed them and figure a little configuration is all I need. Read the man
pages, make my diald.conf file and my connect script, and I should be off.
But NOOOOO. I've gotten it to dial on demand but it won't get the ppp0
link up. I've tried and tried but am missing the magical whatever it is
that will make the damn thing work. Irritating as hell! Usually I can
always make these things work after reading up on them for a while but not
this time. A little help would be appreciated. And could someone please
enlighten me as to why I couldn't just use my regular script that uses PAP?
My diald.conf
=============
mode ppp
fifo /etc/diald/diald.ctl
connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/ppp/scripts/dialerd"
device /dev/modem
speed 115200
modem
debug 31
crtscts
local 192.168.0.1
remote 192.168.0.2
dynamic
defaultroute
include /usr/lib/diald/standard.filter
My dialer script
================
ABORT "NO CARRIER"
ABORT BUSY
"" ATZ OK
ATDT8123900
CONNECT ""
login: xxxxxxxx
ssword: xxxxxxxx
The bad log file
================
May 14 12:08:51 localhost diald[11440]: Using fifo /etc/diald/diald.ctl
May 14 12:08:51 localhost diald[11440]: Starting diald version 0.16.5
May 14 12:08:51 localhost diald[11440]: Proxy device established on interface sl0
May 14 12:08:52 localhost diald[11440]: Setting pointopoint route for sl0
May 14 12:08:52 localhost diald[11440]: Establishing routes for sl0
May 14 12:08:52 localhost diald[11440]: Changed snoop device to sl0
May 14 12:08:52 localhost diald[11440]: Diald initial setup completed.
May 14 12:08:59 localhost diald[11440]: FIFO. Termination request received.
May 14 12:08:59 localhost diald[11440]: Diald is dieing with code 0
May 14 12:08:59 localhost diald[11440]: Closing modem line.
May 14 12:08:59 localhost diald[11440]: taking proxy device down
May 14 12:08:59 localhost diald[11440]: Removing routes for sl0
May 14 12:08:59 localhost diald[11440]: Deleting pointopoint route for sl0
May 14 12:09:27 localhost diald[11453]: Using fifo /etc/diald/diald.ctl
May 14 12:09:27 localhost diald[11453]: Starting diald version 0.16.5
May 14 12:09:27 localhost diald[11453]: Proxy device established on interface sl0
May 14 12:09:27 localhost diald[11453]: Setting pointopoint route for sl0
May 14 12:09:28 localhost diald[11453]: Establishing routes for sl0
May 14 12:09:28 localhost diald[11453]: Changed snoop device to sl0
May 14 12:09:28 localhost diald[11453]: Diald initial setup completed.
May 14 12:09:51 localhost PAM_pwdb[11459]: (su) session opened for user root by
mikevw(uid=0)
May 14 12:09:55 localhost diald[11453]: FIFO: Link up request received.
May 14 12:09:56 localhost diald[11453]: Running connect (pid = 11462).
May 14 12:09:56 localhost chat[11462]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
May 14 12:09:56 localhost chat[11462]: abort on (BUSY)
May 14 12:09:56 localhost chat[11462]: send (ATZ^M)
May 14 12:09:56 localhost chat[11462]: expect (OK)
May 14 12:09:58 localhost chat[11462]: ATZ^M^M
May 14 12:09:58 localhost chat[11462]: OK
May 14 12:09:58 localhost chat[11462]: -- got it
May 14 12:09:58 localhost chat[11462]: send (ATDT8123900^M)
May 14 12:09:58 localhost chat[11462]: expect (CONNECT)
May 14 12:09:58 localhost chat[11462]: ^M
May 14 12:10:14 localhost chat[11462]: ATDT8123900^M^M
May 14 12:10:14 localhost chat[11462]: CONNECT
May 14 12:10:14 localhost chat[11462]: -- got it
May 14 12:10:14 localhost chat[11462]: send (^M)
May 14 12:10:14 localhost chat[11462]: expect (login:)
May 14 12:10:14 localhost chat[11462]: 115200^M
May 14 12:10:15 localhost chat[11462]: MindSpring sea Dialup Service^M^M
May 14 12:10:15 localhost chat[11462]: ^M^M
May 14 12:10:15 localhost chat[11462]: arc-1a.sea login:
May 14 12:10:15 localhost chat[11462]: -- got it
May 14 12:10:15 localhost chat[11462]: send (xxxxxxxx^M)
May 14 12:10:15 localhost chat[11462]: expect (ssword:)
May 14 12:10:15 localhost chat[11462]: xxxxxxxx^M
May 14 12:10:15 localhost chat[11462]: Password:
May 14 12:10:15 localhost chat[11462]: -- got it
May 14 12:10:15 localhost chat[11462]: send (xxxxxxxx^M)
May 14 12:10:15 localhost diald[11453]: Running pppd (pid = 11463).
May 14 12:10:15 localhost kernel: PPP: version 2.2.0 (dynamic channel allocation)
May 14 12:10:15 localhost kernel: PPP Dynamic channel allocation code copyright 1995
Caldera, Inc.
May 14 12:10:15 localhost kernel: PPP line discipline registered.
May 14 12:10:15 localhost kernel: registered device ppp0
May 14 12:10:15 localhost diald[11453]: filter accepted rule 22 proto 17 len 70 packet
192.168.0.1,1978 => 207.69.188.185,53
May 14 12:10:20 localhost diald[11453]: filter accepted rule 22 proto 17 len 70 packet
192.168.0.1,1979 => 207.69.188.185,53
May 14 12:10:25 localhost diald[11453]: filter accepted rule 22 proto 17 len 70 packet
192.168.0.1,1980 => 207.69.188.185,53
May 14 12:10:29 localhost diald[11453]: filter accepted rule 6 proto 6 len 40 seq
c36b1948 ack 232a53ac flags FIN ACK packet 165.121.37.38,16483 => 18.29.1.67,80
May 14 12:10:30 localhost diald[11453]: filter accepted rule 22 proto 17 len 70 packet
192.168.0.1,1981 => 207.69.188.185,53
May 14 12:10:34 localhost diald[11453]: filter accepted rule 22 proto 17 len 70 packet
192.168.0.1,1982 => 207.69.188.185,53
May 14 12:10:35 localhost diald[11453]: filter accepted rule 6 proto 6 len 40 seq
82de7954 ack 2dabbf33 flags FIN ACK packet 165.121.37.38,16484 => 18.29.1.67,80
May 14 12:10:35 localhost diald[11453]: filter accepted rule 6 proto 6 len 40 seq
1ca269e9 ack 64f6cbb3 flags FIN ACK packet 165.121.37.38,16485 => 18.29.1.67,80
May 14 12:10:37 localhost diald[11453]: filter accepted rule 22 proto 17 len 70 packet
192.168.0.1,1983 => 207.69.188.185,53
May 14 12:10:40 localhost diald[11453]: filter accepted rule 22 proto 17 len 70 packet
192.168.0.1,1984 => 207.69.188.185,53
May 14 12:10:46 localhost diald[11453]: filter accepted rule 22 proto 17 len 70 packet
192.168.0.1,1985 => 207.69.188.185,53
May 14 12:10:46 localhost diald[11453]: filter ignored rule 9 proto 6 len 40 seq
a2f2f6e9 ack 32acfb89 flags FIN ACK packet 165.121.32.72,16488 => 204.244.59.246,21
May 14 12:10:47 localhost diald[11453]: child process 11463 terminated with signal 1
May 14 12:10:47 localhost diald[11453]: Setting pointopoint route for sl0
May 14 12:10:47 localhost diald[11453]: Establishing routes for sl0
May 14 12:10:48 localhost diald[11453]: Setting pointopoint route for sl0
May 14 12:10:48 localhost diald[11453]: Establishing routes for sl0
May 14 12:10:48 localhost diald[11453]: Closing modem line.
May 14 12:10:49 localhost diald[11453]: Delaying 30 seconds before clear to dial.
May 14 12:11:21 localhost diald[11453]: Running connect (pid = 11474).
May 14 12:11:21 localhost chat[11474]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
May 14 12:11:21 localhost chat[11474]: abort on (BUSY)
--
Trying to prevent arterial clogging of my CPU from eating too much spam!
Change the spam in my address to spring to reply. Stop the inspamity!
Visit my website www.mindspring.com/~us015148
This is a Microsoft Free message.
.........
`:::' ....... ......
::: * `::. ::'
::: .:: .:.::. .:: .:: `::. :'
::: :: :: :: :: :: .::.
::: .::. .:: ::. `::::. .:' ::.
...:::.....................::' .::::..
The choice of a GNU generation
UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.
--
Trying to prevent arterial clogging of my CPU from eating too much spam!
Change the spam in my address to spring to reply. Stop the inspamity!
Visit my website www.mindspring.com/~us015148
This is a Microsoft Free message.
.........
`:::' ....... ......
::: * `::. ::'
::: .:: .:.::. .:: .:: `::. :'
::: :: :: :: :: :: .::.
::: .::. .:: ::. `::::. .:' ::.
...:::.....................::' .::::..
The choice of a GNU generation
UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
