Linux-Networking Digest #175, Volume #11 Sun, 16 May 99 12:13:25 EDT
Contents:
Re: ip multicast problem (ioctl SIOCGETRPF) in kernel 2.2.8 (Andi Kleen)
ppp over direct serial link ("roger jaeck")
Re: 2 modems 2 ISP accts. is it possible? (Scattershot)
Re: Samba & Win 9x clients: automatically mapping drives (Lee Allen)
Re: ipchains help please (Uri Zalk)
Re: newbie-to-lan: cannot ping other box (hazzmat)
3Com's 3C575 PCCard NIC supported under v2.2.x kernel? ("Steve Snyder")
Re: ppp over direct serial link ("Bono")
IN SEARCH OF: HP Linux Drivers (Mark Lucas II)
Re: ppp linux 2.2 problem (Clifford Kite)
Re: PPP QUery on ISP Termination (Clifford Kite)
kernel compilation problems revisited ("William R. Mattil")
Re: Forwarding with multiple ethernet cards (Christian Armeanu)
Re: Portscanned on port 111 (sunrpc) (Christopher Schulte)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.development.system
Subject: Re: ip multicast problem (ioctl SIOCGETRPF) in kernel 2.2.8
From: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16 May 1999 16:16:15 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaifu Wu) writes:
> I have been trying to setup bunch of linux systems running pimd
> (http://netweb.usc.edu/pim/). I have enabled multicast routing
> and PIM, and though it compiled fine under all my systems running
> 2.2.8, it crashed when making a call to ioctl:
>
> 21:44:18.807 ioctl SIOCGETRPF k_req_incoming: Invalid argument
[...]
See the pimd patches in ftp.inr.ac.ru:/ip-routing/pim/
-Andi
--
This is like TV. I don't like TV.
------------------------------
From: "roger jaeck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp over direct serial link
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 16:45:55 +0200
hello,
I would like to connect two pc's over a serial link.
I connect the two computers over a serial link over the ports ttyS1 on each
computer. I testet the link via kermit and this works great.
I read the PPP-howto and configured both computer as described.
server's ip : 10.30.201.5
local's ip: 10.30.201.9
I started the pppd as described but as I would like to ping the computers
nothing happend:
I pinged from 10.30.201.9 over serial link to 10.30.201.5 and the answer was
network not reachable.
I pinged from 10.30.201.5 to 10.30.201.5 everything worked fine. (it's local
host)
But pinging from 10.30.201.5 over serial link to 10.30.201.9 the answer was
the same: network not reachable.
may anybody help me give me a hint where I find more information on this
problem
thanks a lot
roger
------------------------------
From: Scattershot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: 2 modems 2 ISP accts. is it possible?
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 09:53:17 -0500
Jack wrote:
> anybody tried modem bonding in Linux? where you use 2 modems and 2 ISP
>
> accts in one computer.
>
> is it possible now in Linux?
I've heard about bonding using two modems/lines to 'one' ISP, but not to
two
seperate ISPs. It would be nice if that can be done, ie have one modem
dial your ISP and the second dialing something like NetZero and having
twice the bandwidth! I would like information on this as well (I know
there is some info on getting NetZero to work with Linux out there as
well).
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Allen)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Samba & Win 9x clients: automatically mapping drives
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 14:19:16 GMT
I read DOMAIN.txt, and some other semi-relevant manuals, and
eventually found this:
1. Samba supports automatic execution of login scripts for Win 9x
clients
2. Under Win 9x those login scripts are just batch files
3. Here is the batch file command ("DOS command") to map a drive:
NET USE drive: \\computer\directory
Thanks.
-Lee Allen
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Uri Zalk)
Subject: Re: ipchains help please
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 14:44:34 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The following worked for me on upgrade from 5.2 to 6.0:
(At the end of /etc/rc.d/rc.local)
...
echo "ip_masq 192.168.1.1"
echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
/sbin/depmod -a
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_ftp.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_nasq_raudio.o
/sbin/modprobe ip_masq_irc.o
# This was the old version using ipfwadm:
# /sbin/ipfwadm -F -p deny
# /sbin/ipfwadm -F -a m -S192.168.42.0/24 - D0.0.0.0/0
# Now using ipchains:
/sbin/ipchains -P forward DENY
/sbin/ipchains -A forward -j MASQ -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 0.0.0.0/0
# Just to make sure:
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.1
/sbin/route add -net 192.168.42.0
..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anjan Sen) wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I have a system that is Red Hat 5.2, with the kernel newly upgraded to
>2.2.7. I have a small private network with 192.168.*.* addreses, and this
>Linux box that acts as a gateway. It's on dialup and has a static ip
>address.
>
>Prior to the upgrade I was using ipfwadm to masquerade my private
>addresses like this, and it worked pretty well
>
> ipfwadm -F -p deny
> ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.1/32 -D 0.0.0.0/0
>
>Now, after the upgrade I attempted to get ipchains running in a very
>simple manner. I thought I'd start off by using Rusty's Three-Line guide
>To Masquerading found at www.rustcorp.com. My problem is that although I
>have the correct version of ipchains - 1.3.8 - even when i cut and
>paste the lines from my web browser, I get syntax errors from ipchains.
Snip ...
------------------------------
From: hazzmat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: newbie-to-lan: cannot ping other box
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 11:05:35 -0400
> Hello again, here is dmesg output. Changed irq to 11 --still no blinking on
> the hub. Thanks for all the thought you've been putting in toward this. I
> downloaded kernel 2.2.9 last night because I saw something that said it had
> better support for ne clones like mine, and I botched the install somehow.
> Anyway, there is a reference to irq's on ide1 in the body of this output but
> I have no idea what it means.
> Linux version 2.2.5-15 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
> egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)) #1 Mon Apr 19 22:21:09 EDT
> 1999
> Detected 350803218 Hz processor.
> Console: colour VGA+ 80x25
> Calibrating delay loop... 699.60 BogoMIPS
> Memory: 127972k/131008k available (996k kernel code, 412k reserved, 1568k
> data, 60k init)
> VFS: Diskquotas version dquot_6.4.0 initialized
> CPU: AMD AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor stepping 00
> Checking 386/387 coupling... OK, FPU using exception 16 error reporting.
> Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
> POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
> PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfb2f0
> PCI: Using configuration type 1
> PCI: Probing PCI hardware
> PCI: 00:38 [1106/0586]: Work around ISA DMA hangs (00)
> Activating ISA DMA hang workarounds.
> Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.2
> Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
> NET4: Unix domain sockets 1.0 for Linux NET4.0.
> NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
> IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
> Initializing RT netlink socket
> Starting kswapd v 1.5
>
> Detected PS/2 Mouse Port.
> Serial driver version 4.27 with MANY_PORTS MULTIPORT SHARE_IRQ enabled
> ttyS02 at 0x03e8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
> ttyS03 at 0x02e8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
> pty: 256 Unix98 ptys configured
> apm: BIOS version 1.2 Flags 0x07 (Driver version 1.9)
> Real Time Clock Driver v1.09
> RAM disk driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size
> VP_IDE: IDE controller on PCI bus 00 dev 39
> VP_IDE: not 100% native mode: will probe irqs later
> ide0: BM-DMA at 0xe000-0xe007, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:DMA
> ide1: BM-DMA at 0xe008-0xe00f, BIOS settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:DMA
> hda: WDC AC26400B, ATA DISK drive
> hdb: WDC AC35100L, ATA DISK drive
> hdc: ATAPI CD-ROM DRIVE 32X MAXIMUM, ATAPI CDROM drive
> hdd: IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI Floppy, ATAPI FLOPPY drive
> ide2: ports already in use, skipping probe
> ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
> ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
> hda: WDC AC26400B, 6149MB w/512kB Cache, CHS=784/255/63
> hdb: WDC AC35100L, 4924MB w/256kB Cache, CHS=627/255/63
> hdc: ATAPI 27X CD-ROM drive, 120kB Cache
> Uniform CDROM driver Revision: 2.54
> Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M
>
> FDC 0 is a post-1991 82077
> md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MAX_REAL=12
> raid5: measuring checksumming speed
> raid5: using high-speed MMX checksum routine
> pII_mmx : 753.999 MB/sec
> p5_mmx : 673.989 MB/sec
> 8regs : 515.493 MB/sec
> 32regs : 369.189 MB/sec
> using fastest function: pII_mmx (753.999 MB/sec)
> scsi : 0 hosts.
> scsi : detected total.
> md.c: sizeof(mdp_super_t) = 4096
> Partition check:
> hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 hda6 hda7 >
> hdb:
> autodetecting RAID arrays
> autorun ...
> ... autorun DONE.
> VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 60k freed
> Adding Swap: 72256k swap-space (priority -1)
> Soundblaster audio driver Copyright (C) by Hannu Savolainen 1993-1996
> SB 4.16 detected OK (220)
> <SoundBlaster EMU8000 (RAM512k)>
> ne.c:v1.10 9/23/94 Donald Becker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> NE*000 ethercard probe at 0x300: 00 40 95 76 f2 07
> eth0: NE2000 found at 0x300, using IRQ 11.
> Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> nfsd_init: initialized fhcache, entries=256
> CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California
> PPP: version 2.3.3 (demand dialling)
> PPP line discipline registered.
> registered device ppp0
> Try IRQ 11. Since it seems to be finding the card a 0x300, I assume that is
> correct. But, you might take a look
> /proc/ioports to see if there is a possible overlap. Also post output of
> dmesg if you can.
>
> hazzmat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Curt wrote:
> >
> > > Do you recall what IRQ it used under 5.1, mostly likely that will work
> > > again.
> > > I doubt if it was IRQ 9. Try setting the following in /etc/conf.modules
> > >
> > > alias eth0 ne
> > > options ne io=0x300 irq=10
> > >
> >
> > Seems to be doing the same at irq10 and 7 as it was at 9. I can ping
> > 192.168.1.1 --but nothing else.
> > INKY /root]# cat /proc/interrupts
> > CPU0
> > 0: 77288 XT-PIC timer
> > 1: 797 XT-PIC keyboard
> > 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> > 4: 32691 XT-PIC serial
> > 5: 68539 XT-PIC soundblaster
> > 7: 0 XT-PIC NE2000
> > 8: 2 XT-PIC rtc
> > 12: 27308 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse
> > 13: 1 XT-PIC fpu
> > 14: 101342 XT-PIC ide0
> > 15: 25 XT-PIC ide1
> > NMI: 0
> > [root@BLINKY /root]# ping 192.168.1.2
> > PING 192.168.1.2 (192.168.1.2): 56 data bytes
> >
> > --- 192.168.1.2 ping statistics ---
> > 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
> >
> > I don't know what irq # it used to work at --it was about a year ago that
> it
> > was setup that way. 5.1 was installed to my box through the card at a
> Linux
> > friendly store. I never actually needed the card 'til now.
> >
> > I edited conf.modules like you suggested and I removed the pre-existing
> eth0
> > reference
> > so that it now looks like this:
> >
> > alias parport_lowlevel parport_pc
> > pre-install pcmcia_core /etc/rc.d/init.d/pcmcia start
> > alias sound sb
> > pre-install sound insmod sound dmabuf=1
> > options opl3 io=0x388
> > alias midi awe_wave
> > post-install awe_wave /bin/sfxload /etc/midi/GU11-ROM.SF2
> > options sb dma16=5 io=0x220 mpu_io=0x330 irq=5 dma=1
> > alias eth0 ne
> > options ne io=0x300 irq=7
> > (also tried irq10 first)
> >
> > I am rebooting between changes because I noticed that the address in
> > /proc/interrupts wasn't changing along with changes to conf.modules even
> though
> > I restarted the kernel daemon (hit the button for it) through kernelcfg.
> Also I
> > am checking to make sure these Irq's are not turned off in the BIOS (10
> was
> > disabled, but I turned it on to 'primary' before trying)
> > When I attempt to ping the G3 the LED on the hub should blink some right?
> Any
> > other configuration files that I need to know about --like routing stuff?
> >
------------------------------
From: "Steve Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware
Subject: 3Com's 3C575 PCCard NIC supported under v2.2.x kernel?
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 09:26:41 -0400 (EST)
Reply-To: "Steve Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've got a notebook system that uses 3Com's 3C575 for a LAN connection.
This is a CardBus (i.e. busmastering PCMCIA card) device.
Is this card supported under the v2.2x kernel and latest PCMCIA package?
For example, does RedHat's v6.0 release support this card?
Thank you.
***** Steve Snyder *****
------------------------------
From: "Bono" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ppp over direct serial link
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 00:05:22 +0900
It's unclear what the OS of 2pcs is and what exactly you did.
More details are needed.
You will need all these to get it right =)
Linux Serial HOWTO
Linux Modem HOWTO
Linux Kernel HOWTO
Linux PPP HOWTO
Good Luck!
roger jaeck ��(��) <7hmloe$c5n$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ��������
�ۼ��Ͽ����ϴ�...
>hello,
>
>I would like to connect two pc's over a serial link.
>
>I connect the two computers over a serial link over the ports ttyS1 on each
>computer. I testet the link via kermit and this works great.
>
>I read the PPP-howto and configured both computer as described.
>
>server's ip : 10.30.201.5
>local's ip: 10.30.201.9
>
>I started the pppd as described but as I would like to ping the computers
>nothing happend:
>
>I pinged from 10.30.201.9 over serial link to 10.30.201.5 and the answer
was
>network not reachable.
>
>I pinged from 10.30.201.5 to 10.30.201.5 everything worked fine. (it's
local
>host)
>But pinging from 10.30.201.5 over serial link to 10.30.201.9 the answer was
>the same: network not reachable.
>
>may anybody help me give me a hint where I find more information on this
>problem
>
>thanks a lot
>
>roger
>
>
------------------------------
From: Mark Lucas II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: IN SEARCH OF: HP Linux Drivers
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 08:54:59 -0500
==============26BC3365A735985E7D696A00
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I am putting up a Linux print server for a school. They are running a HP
895 printer that needs to be networked. I checked out HP's Linux site
(which sucks!). http://www.hp.com/go/linux
The site is un-navigatable.
Can I find these drivers anywhere? I have heard that BSD drivers will
work, is that completely true? Please E-MAIL me, and thanks alot!
Mark Lucas II
Networking Engineer
BiState TELESOURCE
==============26BC3365A735985E7D696A00
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
I am putting up a Linux print server for a school. They are running a HP
895 printer that needs to be networked. I checked out HP's Linux site (which
sucks!). <A HREF="http://www.hp.com/go/linux">http://www.hp.com/go/linux</A>
<br>The site is un-navigatable.
<p>Can I find these drivers anywhere? I have heard that BSD drivers will
work, is that completely true? <b>Please E-MAIL me</b>, and thanks alot!
<p>Mark Lucas II
<br>Networking Engineer
<br>BiState TELESOURCE</html>
==============26BC3365A735985E7D696A00==
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: ppp linux 2.2 problem
Date: 16 May 1999 09:14:55 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I have been running ppp fine with linux kernel 2.0.36. I tried moving it
: 2.2.9 and upgrading pppd as well to 2.3.8 and I am suddenly not able
: to connect anymore.
: I am running the following command:
: /usr/sbin/pppd debug noipdefault passive /dev/ttyS3 38400 defaultroute
: connect '/etc/ppp/connect.sh'
: and get the following debugging output:
: May 15 16:14:41 orangehat pppd[2232]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/ttyS3
: May 15 16:14:42 orangehat pppd[2232]: sent [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 <asyncmap
: 0x0> <magic 0xe99c07cc> <pcomp> <accomp>]
: May 15 16:14:42 orangehat pppd[2232]: rcvd [LCP ConfReq id=0x1 < 00 04
: 00 00> <mru 1524> <asyncmap 0xa0000> <pcomp> <accomp> < 11 04 05 f4> <
: 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 7e a6 74>]
: May 15 16:14:42 orangehat pppd[2232]: sent [LCP ConfRej id=0x1 < 00 04
: 00 00> < 11 04 05 f4> < 13 09 03 00 c0 7b 7e a6 74>]
ect.
I haven't done kernel 2.2.9 or ppp-2.3.8 yet but barring a bug in one
of these simply upgrading to them should not cause this - provided that
you read the linux/Documentation/Changes file and did all the upgrades
that are needed for the new kernel.
You are getting the ISP requests, sending messages, and reacting to the
ISP requests. The ISP is sending messages and you are receiving them
but the ISP is either not getting your messages or is getting them in
a garbled form. The occurrence of such a problem at the very start
of PPP link negotiations usually means that something is wrong in the
modem's internal configuration or in the configuration of the UART by
setserial at boot-up. It might be caused by old networking and serial
configuration tools too.
It is, BTW, not an asyncmap problem - asyncmap problems appear after the
asyncmap is negotiated and always arise because the ISP PPP implementation
is broken in this regard. There are surprising many that are broken in
this way.
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* 97.3% of all statistics are made up. */
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Crossposted-To: linux.redhat.ppp
Subject: Re: PPP QUery on ISP Termination
Date: 16 May 1999 08:45:51 -0500
jas. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: I've tried putting sleep 300 in my ip-down scripts and such but it seems
: to be ignored.
Try specifying the full path, i.e., /bin/sleep 300 .
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* I gave up on politics when no matter who I voted for, I regretted it.
* -- Pepper...and Salt, WSJ */
------------------------------
From: "William R. Mattil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel compilation problems revisited
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 21:47:38 -0500
Can anyone assist with the following ?
Red Hat 4.2 (though similar problems exist with 5.1 and 5.2)
In trying to compile a new kernel (SMP or other :^)) on a system with
the following config:
single IDE (boot drive), dual scsi (Buslogic), 3c503 network card.
If I leave scsi (BusLogic) and 3c503 enabled as modules:
1) make config
2) make dep
3) make clean
4) make zImage
5) mv new zImage to /boot, edit /etc/lilo.conf as needed and rerun
lilo
6) make modules
7) mv /lib/modules/2.0.30 to /lib/modules/2.0.30.old
8) make modules_install
9) reboot
results in the following:
error messages module version 2.0.30 doesnt match blah blah blah
buslogic scsi drives not detected nor is the network card and System
drops me into a maintenace shell from which insmod BusLogic works just
fine.
Tried using the new System.map file as well with pretty much the same
results.
So what are the steps needed to get a working kernel ?? This is a recent
problem
(post 4.2 Red Hat) as I have done this many times with previous
versions. I have
absolutely no doubt that it is module related but searches on Deja News
have
turned up no clues and Red Hats site offers nothing either. The systems
default
(as installed) configuration works just fine (non SMP) but this problem
is not
, I repeat not SMP related as I cannot get a non SMP kernel to work
either.
Red Hat 5.1 and 5.2 fail as well so these are not options either. I need
to stay with
a 2.0.30 kernel if at all possible.
BTW: If I compile BusLogic and 3c503 support into the kernel (instead of
modules)
I can get the new kernel to boot but it insists on trying use the
BusLogic module
regardless of /etc/conf.modules. Is this mkinitrd related ???? Any
pointers here would
be greatly appreciated.
Regards
Bill
PS: reply via e-mail would be appreciated as well. I will summarize to
the group.
--
William R. Mattil | Fred Astaire wasn't so great.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Ginger had to do it all backwards
(972) 399-4106 | and... in high heels.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Armeanu)
Subject: Re: Forwarding with multiple ethernet cards
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 17:12:31 +0200
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<br>Wow, it almost worked :-( The PCs can now see each other, but as soon
as I try to access
<br>the resources, windows keeps telling me they're not accessible !
<br>( I also inserted the 192.168.18.0 network too );
<p>Again, any help will be highly appreciated,
<br>Chris
<p>Mircea wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Yes, and don't forget:
<p>echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
<p>MST
<p>Joe Kellner wrote:
<br>>
<br>> ipchains -P forward DENY
<br>> ipchains -A forward -s 192.168.17.0/24 -j MASQ
<br>>
<br>> Christian Armeanu wrote:
<br>> >
<br>> ></blockquote>
</html>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher Schulte)
Subject: Re: Portscanned on port 111 (sunrpc)
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 16:14:42 GMT
On 16 May 1999 15:50:57 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Unruh) wrote:
>On linux that is just portmap, nfsd, mountd.
For me (linux, slakware4, 2.2.9 kernel) it's rpc.portmap, rpc.mountd,
and rpc.nfsd. That's been the names for every slakware distro I've
seen. Might very well be different for other vendor's compilations.
>rpcinfo will tell you which rpc services are runniing.
Don't you need to issue some extra argument to rpcinfo, such as
rpcinfo -p to show registered ports and so on...?
As far as I know, 2.2beta29 of mountd from the Universal NFS Server
package was vulnerable to an exploit.
--
Christopher Schulte
Replace usenet with chris to send mail.
Mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
will *never* get to me. I hate spam!
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
