Linux-Networking Digest #177, Volume #11 Sun, 16 May 99 17:13:40 EDT
Contents:
Re: how do I setup exceed ? ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Full duplex with 3com 3c90x (Christian Armeanu)
Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot: (John Thompson)
printing problem: more information (Edouard Oyer)
Re: ppp connection (madzax)
Re: Linux and Macs Networked Together... (Kwan Lowe)
squid and access-lists (Ralf Schlotbohm)
ppp is up, but no FTP or telnet ... ("Joost Gevers")
Realaudio through firewall... (FoT)
Re: samba: problems with capital letters ("W. Boschman")
Any Easier Way To Dial-on-Demand Than Diald? (Peter Schwenk)
Re: DNS? ("Ian")
NIS Linux - Solaris (Michael Abadjiev)
Re: Apache on Large Corporate Network ("Andrey Smirnov")
Re: Upgrade to redhat 6 (Michael Abadjiev)
Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly (Michael Abadjiev)
FTP-Statistics in HTML? (Steffen Leich)
Re: Network: Can I use Crossover Cable Instead of a Hub? (brian moore)
OMNIS Studio RAD Tool available on Linux soon....... ("Richard D")
Re: Full duplex with 3com 3c90x (Mark Crosland)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crossposted-To: apana.lists.web.java.linux,comp.os.linux.help,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: how do I setup exceed ?
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 18:09:49 GMT
In article <EdA%2.4953$97.4069@stones>,
"David Travers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use Exceed V4 with no problems.
>
> I couldn't get rexec to work but rlogin works fine, and is probably
the most
> desirable way to do it anyway.
>
> First of all make sure the Exceed X server is running on the PC with
Win98.
> If it isn't running then you will get the
> X11TransSocketINETConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111
> xterm Xt error: Can't open display: 192.168.1.3:0.0
>
> error message.
>
> To test the functionality of the Exceed server do the following.
>
> At the command line on the Linux box type xterm -display 192.168.1.3:0
&
>
> This will create a new terminal which should appear on your PC.
>
here is how i test it:
open dos-box on win98
telnet to linux (telnet 192.168.1.3)
login , NOT as root
on win9x, start exceed (just so you have the x-window-server ready)
in the telnet window, type 'xterm -display 192.168.1.3'
in the x-window (exceed-x-server) your xterm should appear
> If this works then basically your setup is fine. I'm not sure about
this but
> I think the mistake you made is with 0.0 instead of just 0.
>
> Next create the Exceed script which will automate this one stage
further and
> associate with an icon as you have done. I personally have created a
> shortcut on my desktop called "Connect To Server".
>
> I have been using this for a while now and have had no problems. Can
run
> Netscape, linuxconf, Word Perfect and all other X programs. Watch out
for
> StarOffice 5.0 however (if you use it), will probably crash not only
the
> Win98 PC upon startup but possibly also the Linux box.
>
> You can then change the parameters of the switches as you require.
>
> Note also when you issue new X programs on Exceed terminal, they will
start
> on the Win98 PC and not the linux box, so as long as you get one
terminal
> working then everthing else is a doddle.
>
> If it doesn't work e-mail me.
>
> bibi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:eCWaQ7kn#GA.140@cpmsnbbsa02...
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have a P233 win98 box and a P200 Linux RedHat 5.2 box. What I want
to do
> > is to load the x windos from my
> > win 98 box. I have exceed 6.0.
> >
> > Ok now come to the point.
> >
> > This is my exceed setup.
> > win98 ip: 192.168.1.3
> > Linux ip: 192.168.1.1
> >
> > Xconfig seups
> > ------------------------
> > communication = passive
> > display number = 0
> >
> > Protocol = default
> >
> > Window mode = multiple.
> >
> > Xstart setup
> > --------------------
> > start method: REXEC(TCP/IP)
> > Program type : X window
> > Host type: Unix
> > command: /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -sb -ls -display 192.168.1.3:0.0 -fg
> blue -bg
> > lightgrey &
> >
> > when I Run it, the error message says: "Unable to connect to the
host
> using
> > specified start method"
> >
> > But If I change the
> >
> > start method: REXEC(TCP/IP) to RLOGIN(TCP/IP) and the
> > command: /usr/X11R6/bin/startx -sb -ls -display 192.168.1.3:0.0 -fg
> blue -bg
> > lightgrey &
> >
> > the X Window starts on the Linux box instead of my Win98.
> >
> > when I setup the export DISPLAY=192.168.1.3:0.0 and use the
> > xhost command, the following error comes up:
> >
> > _X11TransSocketINETConnect: Can't connect: errno = 111
> > xterm Xt error: Can't open display: 192.168.1.3:0.0
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know how to setup it?
> > Please email me or discuss about this matter.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > VJ
> >
> >
>
>
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Armeanu)
Subject: Full duplex with 3com 3c90x
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 20:59:58 +0200
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
How can I enable full duplex with 3c90x boards ?
<br>I tried to enable it using the (DOS) configuration tool, but it didn't
work.
<br>Then I had a look into the source and found it to be default to Half-duplex.
<br>Modifying the default to FULL-duplex results in non-opration at all.
( I have NIC-to-NIC, so it should work).
<p>Once again, any help will be very appreciated.
<br>Chris</html>
------------------------------
From: John Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: SECURITY ISSUES: Single user restriction at lilo boot:
Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 21:33:53 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> I know that booting from floppy as single user and mounting the root
> disk can be used to rescue a system with a forgotten root password. I'm
> also aware that this is a part of any unix system.
>
> It so happens that Lilo form the harddisk accepts the "linux single"
> boot option. Allowing any one to gain root access.
>
> This poses a problem because we plan to depoly some PCs with linux in
> our computer labs and have /home nfs mounted. Given the lack of security
>
> that nfs presents, this posses great problems because a user who has
> gained root access can su to any user in the domain. since most of our
> UNIX systems are setup this way, the /home directory has to be nfs
> mounted.
>
> Comming to the point, How do you block the "linux single" param at boot
> up? what other work arounds can you suggest? Since these are PCs and
> have reset buttons, power cords any user can reboot the machine.
>
> This issue is what prevents us fom deploying linux and new students and
> prospective members of the linux community are at risk.
>
> All help would be greatly appriciated.
You can add a paramenter to your lilo.conf file to prompt
for a password before allowing "linux single" to work, but
this may not stop somebody from bringing in their own boot
floppy and bypassing your protected lilo. If you can't
physically secure the machine so the floppy device can't be
used you will need to enable a BIOS password or at least
change the boot order so that the machine always tries to
boot off the HD before looking for a bootable floppy.
--
-John ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: Edouard Oyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: printing problem: more information
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 12:00:17 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess I did not provide enough information.
I have a linux server.
Additionally to that server, I have a printer that is an ethernet
printer directly connected to the network. It is a HP 4M Plus that is a
postscript printer, then it is standalone. It has it own IP number.
I setup a printer queue on the server in the /etc/printcap with the line
"rm=<IP number>"
When I log on the server as root, I am able to print to it. When I log
as a user without special rights, I cannot and I get the message
"lpr: connect: permission denied.
Jobs queued, but cannot start daemon."
The explaination I had in the printing howto is that my network connect
is badly configured, but it is then paradoxal that I would be able to
print when being root. I wondered if anyone had a hint. I changed the
file permissions, but it is maybe not sufficient.
Edouard
------------------------------
From: madzax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ppp connection
Date: 16 May 1999 19:31:00 GMT
New problem /var/lock/ doesn't exist. Do I just need to reinstall? Or is
there something better I can do?
================== Posted via SearchLinux ==================
http://www.searchlinux.com
------------------------------
From: Kwan Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Linux and Macs Networked Together...
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 03:35:58 -0400
> Now I want to setup linux on the P166 machine so that it can use that same
> softrouter. When I run Windoze on the P166 it all works fine; all I had to
> do in Windoze is set up a network with the Mac Router IP address
> (192.168.0.1) as the Gateway; put in the ISP DNS servers as DNS Servers; and
> give the Windoze machine its own IP Address (192.168.0.2).
>
> That was fairly simple in Windoze. How do I do it in linux?
All you should have to do is:
route add -net x.x.x.0 dev eth0 (packets for x.x.x.- network go
through ethernet)
route add default gw x.x.x.y metric 1 (where x.x.x.y is the ip of your
gateway -- the Mac)
--lastly--
edit /etc/resolv.conf and insert your ISP DNS servers. It would like:
search
nameserver 100.200.200.200 (of course, place your primary
and second DNS here)
nameserver 100.200.200.201
>
> Which leads to some more basic questions:
>
> 1. How do I make sure linux sees and uses the Ethernet Card in the P166?
Read the Ethernet-HOWTO.
>
> 2. How do I set up Linux so that it thinks it is just on a LAN, which is in
> reality what I have set up here?
By default it assumes that it's on some network...You need only edit the
relevant files.
> I don't think linux would know or care that another machine on the LAN is
> actually a softrouter rather than a hardware box. Shouldn't it look the
> same to linux?
Yes.
------------------------------
From: Ralf Schlotbohm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: squid and access-lists
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 21:33:17 +0200
in my network, some hosts are allowed to go anywhere on the internet.
this is easy. but now i have to give all other hosts access to only one
domain.
is it possible ?
what do i have to change in squid.conf ?
thanks for help
ralf
------------------------------
From: "Joost Gevers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ppp is up, but no FTP or telnet ...
Date: 16 May 1999 19:31:52 GMT
Hello, Linux experts
I have some problem to get my ppp working. (I have RedHat 6.0)
I can connect to my ISP, and I obtain an IP adress. I can also ping to the
rest of the world, traceroute works also, my nameserver works, but if I try
to telnet, ftp or http I only get connected to the servers but I don't get
a login prompt or other traffic
How can I solve this problem??
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (FoT)
Subject: Realaudio through firewall...
Date: 16 May 1999 19:00:53 GMT
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm accessing the net through a homebuild firewall.
Now I have the problem that the realaudio client seems to get through
(it says connecting to <host>) and after that it starts buffering data.
So far so good.
Problem is that it doesn't play anything.
The firewall seems to be accepting the data, and buffering it (disk activity).
But the client just ends when the ra file ends, playing nothing.
I've set up ipfwadm to accept realaudio packages by:
ipfwadm -I -a accept -P tcp -W eth1 \
-S 0.0.0.0/0 554 7070 7071 \
-D <firewall_ip> 554 7070 7071
ipfwadm -O -a accept -P tcp -W eth1 \
-S <firewall_ip> 554 7070 7071 \
-D 0.0.0.0/0 554 7070 7071
ipfwadm -I -a accept -P udp -W eth1 \
-S 0.0.0.0/0 6970:7170 \
-D <firewall_ip> 6970:7170
And to masquerade the internal network with:
ipfwadm -F -a masquerade -W eth1 \
-S <local_network_ip_range> \
-D 0.0.0.0/0
I even inserted the module ip_masq_raudio, but that also doesn't seem to do
anything.
Is there anyone who has an idea what mistake I made?
Thanx,
FoT
------------------------------
From: "W. Boschman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: samba: problems with capital letters
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 22:11:42 +0200
Hi Roger,
In the smb.conf file are a few parameters that control case
preservation/sensitivity on the Linux box. You can, in fact, preserve the
case that the filename is in by:
preserve case = yes
For windows clients you should leave
case sensitive = no
or leave it default (which is no).
HTH
Wilco
roger jaeck heeft geschreven in bericht <7hi6ti$ldi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>hello,
>
>I use samba as file server on a SuSe 6.0 linux system. I got a WinNT 4.0 SP
>3 as a client.
>
>If save a file on my local NT disk with starting a capital letter, for
>example "Test.xls" and copy it to my samba server, the copied file lose the
>big "T" and writes "test.xls".
>
>May anybody help to solve this problem
>
>thanks a lot
>
>roger
>
>
------------------------------
From: Peter Schwenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Any Easier Way To Dial-on-Demand Than Diald?
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 16:20:34 -0400
Hello:
I've recently gotten a hold of RH6, and I noticed that there isn't an
easy way to get dial-on-demand PPP working. There's diald, but that
seems difficult to incorporate into the way that RH has things setup.
There was a MiniHOWTO about using the request route features of kerneld
to do demand dialing, but that also seems difficult to setup.
I'm coming from a FreeBSD background where the PPP daemon itself (with
the help of a kernel device) accomplishes demand dialing. It's a simple
addition to the PPP daemon's config file to turn it on.
What's the consensus on the easiest way to get a demand dial setup with
Linux?
- Peter Schwenk
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Ian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DNS?
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 08:30:27 +1200
DB7654321 wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>I am new to linux and networking and wondered: What are the main uses of a
DNS
>server? I have a dialup connection to the internet and do not want to
handle
>DNS requests for the internet. How can I let my ISP handle those? The
only
>reason I might need one is for the small network (3-5 computers) I am going
to
>set up soon. What services need DNS?
<all other questions answered in other peoples posts>
On the client machines, set up your modem machine as the gateway, and put
your ISP's nameserver in the client machines /etc/resolv.conf. This way the
client machines go straight to your ISPs name server and just use your modem
machine as a router.
Depending on your setup (if your ISP doesn't give you static IPs for all
your clients) you will need to set up IP_MASQ on the modem machine, and if
you only want to connect to your ISP when needed the you will need to set up
dial on demand (diald or something like it).
Of course, your modem machine will need some routing rules for firewalling,
etc, but thats all discussed here fairly often and is part of the IP_MASQ
stuff anyway.
Ian
------------------------------
From: Michael Abadjiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: NIS Linux - Solaris
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 20:32:37 GMT
Hello,
I'm trying to setup a RedHat 5.2 box (with all the patches applied) as a
NIS for 3 Solaris 7.0 Intel/SPARC boxes. As far as the login goes
everything is cool, but the automounter doesn't work, Solaris complains
about invalid option in 'auto_master" map it displays 'Invalid option
/misc in auto_master' and basically doesn't mount the home directories.
Is there anyone that have tried that before I'm pretty sure it's doable.
Thanks,
Michael Abadjiev
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Andrey Smirnov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Apache on Large Corporate Network
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 13:37:02 -0700
Hello!
I think you need to give your Linux host a name other then name of your PDC.
As far as accessing this server for your WIndows clients two ways:
1) assign static IP address to the Linux box and add this box to your DNS.
2) use DHCP client on the Linux box, but also configure (smb.conf) it to be
a Wins client.
In tha second scenario Windows clients will be able to resolve Linux box's
name via WINS.
Good luck
Chris Knapp wrote in message <7hju2g$q48$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>Thx for the feedback.
>
>The PDC is the primary domain controller for the network. It suprised me
>when I rebooted after the install and the commandline prompt was something
>like 'root.kanatasms1#' The machine correctly detected who was "boss" on
>the network (the PDC is called 'kanatasms1')
>
>Anyway, you are right, I need to figure out how to 'name' the Linux box so
>that it can be known to all of the NT machines it will cooexist with. I
>think I have some work to do....
>
>Cameron Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:7hj0ik$qv7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> In article <7hicsr$fph$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>> Chris Knapp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Hello,
>> >
>> >I recently installed redhat 5.2 on an older Pentium Pro at work. The
>install
>> >went flawlessly, I selected DHCP as the networking protocol, and when I
>> >rebooted, the machine logged me in as root on the PDC.
>>
>> What's a PDC?
>>
>>
>> >Questions: I want to use this machine as a temporary webserver on a
>> >300-node NT network- how do I get Apache to work?
>>
>> The only hard problem will be telling the 300 NT machines where
>> you are. DHCP is likely to give you a new IP number each time
>> you connect. You have to arrange for somebody to serve that
>> number when one of the 300 NT machines asks for an address
>> for www.linux.yourcompany.com. Hint: ask whoever is responsible
>> for the DHCP server. Chances are they'll give you a static
>> IP number from their secret stash.
>>
>>
>> > A lot of the HowTo's
>> >explain how to use a Linux machine as the sole server, but we have fully
>> >functioning network and simply want to add a web-server. Can someone
>point
>> >me to info on how to do this or give me some general tips?
>>
>> Red Hat comes with Apache. But if you're serious, go to
>> www.apache.org and follow the "Download!" and "Server Documentation"
>> links. Apache is very well put together, and it will install and
>> run for you with no problems, despite its complexity
>> and zillions of installation options. Just read the instructions.
>>
>> Cameron
>> (still baffled by suEXEC though.)
>>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Michael Abadjiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Upgrade to redhat 6
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 20:38:28 GMT
I found RedHat 6.0 completely broken, most of the apps don't work because of
the new glibc also SAMBA is dead so I had to recompile it from SAMBA's
mirror and install it on the machine in order to have SAMBA services,
Netscape blows up once you try to browse a Java Aplet NIS is completelly off
and who knows what more...
Michael Abadjiev
------------------------------
From: Michael Abadjiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Redhat 6.0... the good, the bad, and the ugly
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 20:40:58 GMT
Dave Smith wrote:
> James Stafford wrote:
> >
> > Bill Unruh wrote:
> >
> > > In <7go4ns$4oq$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Robert Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > >Where is everyone getting RH6.0? I thought it wasn't available until the
> > > >10th May....
> > >
> > > Nope been out at least a week by now.
> > > www.redhat.com and all its mirrors. The pressing shops probably will not
> > > be shipping for another week however.
> >
> > I was just at Fry's today and they had it there for$79.00 !!! That's more than I
> > paid for Winblows, more worth it... but still!!!
> >
> > jamess
>
> cheapbytes.com $7.14 (US) delivered in two days
No Manual, Apps CD and support...
------------------------------
From: Steffen Leich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FTP-Statistics in HTML?
Date: 16 May 1999 20:35:07 GMT
Does anybody know a nicely working tool for generating statistical reports
from wuftpd's xferlog, written in HTML and maybe enriched by some graphics?
Steffen
--
___________________________________________________
Steffen Leich Phone: +49-6421-283144
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Universitaet Marburg
Informations- und Kommunikationsdienste FB 02
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (brian moore)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Network: Can I use Crossover Cable Instead of a Hub?
Date: 16 May 1999 21:03:35 GMT
On Sun, 16 May 1999 16:58:23 -0400,
jhull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Here is the question: Can I use crossover cable instead of a Hub?
Yes.
> If I don't have to use a hub, then could someone please tell me what I
> could have done wrong?
>
> I am trying to set up a local network connecting two PCs, one running NT
> server, and the other running Linux RH 5.2/Windows 98.
>
> Before I started to configure the NT-Linux network, I succefully
> configured the NT-Windows98 network using a crossover cable (without
> using a hub).
Trivial to do.
> Then I ran netcfg to configure my network on the Linux box. I
> configured two interfaces, i.e., lo-->127.0.0.1 and
> eth0-->200.50.50.49. It seemed to be OK, until I ran ifconfig which
> only reported my local loopback, but did not recongnize my network card.
Did you install the network card's drivers (either by making a new
kernel or loading the module for it)?
Having the hardware plugged in is only half of it: if you don't tell
Linux you want to -use- the hardware, it will gladly ignore it.
--
Brian Moore | "The Zen nature of a spammer resembles
Sysadmin, C/Perl Hacker | a cockroach, except that the cockroach
Usenet Vandal | is higher up on the evolutionary chain."
Netscum, Bane of Elves. Peter Olson, Delphi Postmaster
------------------------------
From: "Richard D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
comp.os.linux.development.apps,comp.os.linux.development.system,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.m68k,comp.os.linux.misc,comp.os.linux.portable,comp.os.linux.powerpc,comp.os.linux.security,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os
Subject: OMNIS Studio RAD Tool available on Linux soon.......
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 21:13:48 +0100
Please see the following link to read our latest press release regarding the
forthcoming launch of OMNIS Studio on the LINUX operating system platform.
http://www.omnis-software.com/whatsnew/press/linux.html
The beta version will be available from July 1999, with full release in
September this year.
We believe we have a real first here, as OMNIS Studio represents a true
4GL Rapid application development system that is binary compatible with
both Windows and Macintosh machines, and soon LINUX.
This means that developers are totally free to choose their preferred
development platform, and then deploy applications without alteration in
all of the above environments.
If you require any more information about OMNIS Studio, or would like to
know about some of the many commercial applications written in OMNIS
that will soon be available for the LINUX environment please don't
hesitate to contact me.
Kind Regards,
Richard Darsa
OMNIS Software Ltd.
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Crosland)
Subject: Re: Full duplex with 3com 3c90x
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 21:14:04 GMT
Look at one or more of the following
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/diag
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/diag/vortex_diag.c
This is the linux page (maintained?) by the guy who wrote the driver.
The source for vortex_diag looks like it might have a way to force
full-duplex mode (?)
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christian Armeanu wrote:
><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
><html>
>How can I enable full duplex with 3c90x boards ?
><br>I tried to enable it using the (DOS) configuration tool, but it didn't
>work.
><br>Then I had a look into the source and found it to be default to Half-duplex.
><br>Modifying the default to FULL-duplex results in non-opration at all.
>( I have NIC-to-NIC, so it should work).
><p>Once again, any help will be very appreciated.
><br>Chris</html>
>
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
