Linux-Networking Digest #243, Volume #11 Sat, 22 May 99 14:13:38 EDT
Contents:
Re: Modemcard under Linux/KDE (Fahd Khan)
Re: 3Com's 3C575 PCCard NIC supported under v2.2.x kernel? (Michael Spalinski)
Routing IPX through PPP ("Carl Filpo")
Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC ("Steve Snyder")
Re: Ethernet driver (Peter Eddy)
ipchains / port-forwarding (Afrasiab Ahmad)
Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC ("Steve Snyder")
timed problems ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
SMTP to/from internet/intranet using ipfwadm+squid ("dss")
Re: Promote Site to over 1500 Search Engines and Directories 93924 (John Oliver)
Rebooting Wetware (was: Newbie: Ethernet card not detected) ("D. C. & M. V.
Sessions")
Re: Help with NFS export to SunOS 5.6 (John Murtari)
Re: Routing IPX through PPP (Clifford Kite)
Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC ("Tony")
Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC ("Tony")
Re: networking problem (Massimo Boninsegni)
Re: ipchains: DENY or REJECT ("D. C. & M. V. Sessions")
PCMCIA support: recompiling problem (Dmitry)
System shows incorrect localtime. (Nitin Mule)
Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC ("Steve Snyder")
Secondary DNS (UUXX YY)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Fahd Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.uu.comp.os.linux.questions,comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Re: Modemcard under Linux/KDE
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 15:57:29 GMT
Actually, ISA card modems are usually not winmodems (you prolly have just a
10% chance of having a software modem). Try looking into the redhat package
"isapnptools" that will help you set up any plug and play settings for the
card.
Florian Thiel wrote:
> Thanx for answers. But I don't found any link for "only windows".
> Ok, I test an old 33.6 external modem.
>
> >>Does the box which the modem come in, say "only works with Windows" ?
> >>Sounds like you could have a Winmodem.
> >>
> >>Florian Thiel wrote:
> >>> I'm new at linux. Its very good, but I've problem with my modem card.
> >>> It's an ISA-Card under Win98 at COM2:. Only Linux want detect it.
> >>
------------------------------
From: Michael Spalinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.portable
Subject: Re: 3Com's 3C575 PCCard NIC supported under v2.2.x kernel?
Date: 22 May 1999 12:04:50 +0000
>>>>> "Cliff" == Cliff Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Cliff> I'm pretty new at this (linux, that is), and I'm having a devil
Cliff> of a time getting RH 5.2 (v2.0.36 kernel) to recognize my
Cliff> 3CCFE575BT card. cardctl will usually ident it properly, but I
Cliff> can't figure out how to get the system to recognize it and let
Cliff> me use it as eth0.
Cliff> I've tried editing everything from /etc/conf.modules to
Cliff> /etc/pcmcia/config and config.opts. No Go.
Cliff> I've used linuxconf and hand-entered what I could dope out, but
Cliff> No Go.
Cliff> I've even downloaded and built version 3.0.10 of the pcmcia
Cliff> package, at which point it (RH) wouldn't even recognize the card
Cliff> (forget that cb_enabler.c and 3c575_cb.c wouldn't make).
Cliff> <sigh>
Cliff> Does *anyone* have this pc card working in a Dell Latitute CPi?
I just got this card to work yesterday in a Dell I3500. I downloaded the
RH6.0 bootdisk (netboot.img) and the auxilliary pcmcia.img, booted off the
floppy with the NIC in, and answered Y when asked about PCMCIA during
installation. The card was recognized OK. I then opted for an HTTP
installation which went through flawlessly - using the 3CCFE575BT, which of
course continues to work fine. I was upgrading from RH5.2 which has an
older version of he PCMCIA package which did not recognize the card. I was
originally planning to compile the new pcmcia package, but then I figured
this would be a way to upgrade RH at the same time.
M.
------------------------------
From: "Carl Filpo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Routing IPX through PPP
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 22:47:51 +0800
I have a customer I set up with a Debian SLINK 2.1 box that is a gateway
+ mail server to the Internet for their local network.
He would like to dial into another modem hanging off that box and access the
Internet.
But more importantly he needs access his Novell 4 server.
The remote site runs 95/98.
Any info/references/docs/tips on how to set this up would be appreciated.
- Routing between the 2 ppp links ??
- Getting IPX through to the local network
- PPP server
--
Carl Filpo
Computer Network Consultant
=================================================
Carl Filpo BSc(Curtin)
Computer Network Consultant
C&M Computer Solutions
26 Russell St
MORLEY WA 6062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +61 08 9375 1144
Fax: +61 08 9375 1141
Mobile: 0407 396 316
=================================================
------------------------------
From: "Steve Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 10:58:53 -0400 (EST)
Reply-To: "Steve Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 21 May 1999 23:53:51 -0700, Harley Waagmeester wrote:
>Steve Snyder wrote:
[snip]
>IPADDR="24.4.162.173" <-------
>
>You have assigned your internet /cable modem address to your eth1 network card,
>that won't work.
>Give your eth1 card a local ip like you have for the eth0 card.
>I'll give a tough sketch of what needs to happen:
>if you give eth1 an ip address of 192.168.0.13,
>Then you need :
>route add 24.4.162.173 gw 192.168.0.13
>route add default gw 24.4.162.173
>
>I'm probably wrong about the syntax
>Just give the eth1 a local ip address and leave the gateway address as
>24.4.162.173,
>and maybe the startup scripts will set the default route up correctly
>
>I hope someone explains this better, or gives the right numbers to plug into the
>config files :))
>
>The point is that you want a local ip for the eth1 interface card and use that as
>the gateway out
>of the machine, and the default route is a "logical route" that flows through the
>hardware route.
>
>The 24.4.162.173 is the address of the cable modem device
I followed your advice about, but I'm still seeing the same ping/telnet
behavior. This is my updated config:
# cat /etc/sysconfig/network
========================
NETWORKING=yes
FORWARD_IPV4=yes
HOSTNAME="corona.snydernet.lan"
DOMAINNAME=snydernet.lan
GATEWAY=24.4.162.173
GATEWAYDEV=eth1
# /sbin/ifconfig -a
================
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:9A:82:E5
inet addr:192.168.0.12 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:531 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:357 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe400
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:97:C8:01:C8
inet addr:192.168.0.18 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:354 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe800
# netstat -nr
===========
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
192.168.0.12 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
24.4.162.173 192.168.0.18 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.0.18 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth1
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
0.0.0.0 24.4.162.173 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1
As before, the attempt to ping @Home's DNS (IP = 24.4.162.33) just hangs.
Attempting to telnet to the same IP address still gets me this message:
"Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host"
Does the config info above look ok?
***** Steve Snyder *****
------------------------------
From: Peter Eddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Ethernet driver
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 11:29:40 -0400
Try /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/3c509.c
That includes the driver for your 3c905 (which is probably a 3c509B)
Peter
Pablo Yepes wrote:
>
> Hello,
> We have several Dell Dual Pentium machines connected with 100MBit
> ethernet. They have the 3Com 3c905 card.
> I would like to send raw ethernet packets between two machines at a
> low level. I mean without using high level protocols like tcp, ftp or
> similar. I would like to know whether there are example programs at both
> ends of how to do that. Or at least some guidance of where I should
> start.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Pablo
------------------------------
From: Afrasiab Ahmad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ipchains / port-forwarding
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 04:19:53 -0400
Hi,
On our server, we are running Redhat 5.2 with kernel 2.2.9 and currently
use ipchains to masquerade the networked computers. Let's say the main
server is maindomain.com ..
Now, I would like one machine to be live on the internet as
"galaxy.maindomain.com". I cannot use 192.168.1.113 can I? Well, if this
is not the case, we have an IP address we can use...
How should I go about doing this whilst using ipchains. I cannot find any
material on the net which discusses this in depth.
Thank you very much.
Afra
------------------------------
From: "Steve Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 11:05:12 -0400 (EST)
Reply-To: "Steve Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 22 May 1999 09:01:01 -0400, Ken Cormack wrote:
>First, does your cable provider normally use DHCP to set up your IP address? If
>yes, then what you have here is incorrect - Use DHCP rather than hard-coding an
>IP address.
No, they assign a ststic IP address.
>Second, does your cable provider normally require some sort of login
>authentication? (I would be truely STUNNED if they didn't!)
Yes, I have a username and password, but I shouldn't need those just to
ping their nameserver or to establish a telnet connection.
Thanks for the resonse.
***** Steve Snyder *****
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: timed problems
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 15:02:46 GMT
I followed a thread on timed here in this groups, but as this does not
match my questions, I start a new one.
When I start timed on a server with the command
timed -M -F servername
I expected that this daemon would take the master role.
Then I started a client with the command
timed -n network
This is what I got back from the client:
bash-2.02# timedc
timedc> msite
communication error with keller
timedc> q
bash-2.02# ps ax|grep timed
152 ? S 0:00 timed -n dadoka
bash-2.02#
If you have any idea what the output of timedc means and why my clock is
not set, even though the timed is still active, please drop me a note.
Thanks
Karl
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
------------------------------
From: "dss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SMTP to/from internet/intranet using ipfwadm+squid
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 13:04:41 -0300
- Please, help !!!
- I am working using:
internet-sendmail-ipfwadm+squid-sendmail-intranet
- I need send/receive smtp to/from internet/intranet by ipfwadm and squid !
- How I can do this ?
What I need to use for the more security way ?
- Thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Oliver)
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.x
Subject: Re: Promote Site to over 1500 Search Engines and Directories 93924
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 16:17:26 GMT
On Saturday, 22 May 1999 02:12:13 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>Promote your website to Over 1300 Search Engines and Directories for
>ONLY 14.95
>
>Don't pass this great deal up!!
>
>http://promotesite.webjump.comN]
Don't let this idiot go... report him to Hotmail, ISPNews and
sbusiness.net.
------------------------------
From: "D. C. & M. V. Sessions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.setup
Subject: Rebooting Wetware (was: Newbie: Ethernet card not detected)
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 09:11:35 -0700
Ian Hobson wrote:
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, simonbr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes
> >Mohamed S. Abdallah wrote:
> >
> >> I just installed Red Hat 6.0 and it doesn't detect my NE2000 compatible
> >> ethernet card. The card is a SMC EZ 10 ISA. If I need to install a
> >> device driver for the card, where do I get it from and how do I install
> >> it? Otherwise, what settings do I need to make?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mohamed
> >
> >Commenting out the applicable line in /etc/rc.d/rc.modules may just get it
> >working
> >Success,
> >Simon.
> >
> Having got the same problem, I tried to take a look.
>
> Thinks - better copy the file, before risking altering it.....
> how do I copy a file in Linux?
>
> ]# man copy
> no entry for copy
> ]# man cpy
> no entry for cpy
> Thinks -- there used to be a move command in unix and xenix, may be a
> cross reference will help
> man move
> no entry for move
> Thinks - wasn't it spelled mve
> man mve
> no entry for mve
> Thinks .. might it me mv
> man mv
> a page appears.....and tells me the documentation is no longer
> being maintained. No xref to other related commands. No help at all.
>
> Now to close MAN...
> Esc - ignored
> Return - ignored
> Ctrl-C - (END) lights up
> E - Ignored
> ? - No previous regular expression - Press RETURN
> ????? WTF
> Ctrl-D - Ignored
> F1 - Ignored
> Ctrl-Z - [1]+ Stopped man nv
> Return
> Success!
> Hmm - doesn't look like the "proper" way to do it though.
>
> OK, my experience of Linux is limited to non-existant. I'm a complete
> Newbie.
>
> I used, many years ago, to rebuild xenix kernels. I used to tweak that
> O/S to get it to work well on 386/16s (remember them?). 10 years before
> that I was programming mainframes in assembler. With 27 years in the
> industry I am not your typical computer phobic newbie. But....
>
> ... something like the above happens EVERY time I try to do ANYTHING
> with Linux.
>
> How does one get started, without having a local guru to start you off?
It helps to have studied history. Once upon a time, before
the Internet changed everything, there were these strange
things made from dead trees :-)
Seriously, you REALLY want to spring for a copy of O'Reilly's
_Linux_In_a_Nutshell_ -- if you could have only one Linux book
this would be it. Not a tutorial, but absolutely useful every
day. Beyond that, there are a whole bunch of Linux overview
books that all useful, some more than others depending on what
you're trying to do. The LDP (http://metalab.unc.edu/LDP) is
quite helpful but mostly if you've already got a fair collection
of clues.
We know that being in the UK makes a lot of this more expensive,
too. Dunno what CheapBytes overseas charges are or if tarifs
get involved.
--
| Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
| it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
| for new products or new versions of existing products." |
+---------- D. C. & M. V. Sessions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----------+
------------------------------
From: John Murtari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Help with NFS export to SunOS 5.6
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 00:31:38 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> After upgrade from RH 5.2 to 6, when mounting a RH Linux server from a
> SunOS 5.6 client I now get:
>
> "NFS server not responding"
>
> /var/log/messages says
> <server> mountd[3942] : authenticated mount request from <client>
> kernel: svc: unknown version (3)
>
> SunOS 4.3.1 client can connect with no problem. This suggests that I
> have /etc/hosts, /etc/hosts.allow correct and have used exportfs
> correctly.
We have also upgraded from RH 5.2 to 6, and we have a mixture of
Solaris 2.5 and 2.6 clients/servers. Not having any problems right
now with NFS (actually things have gotten a little better with RH 6).
We used to experience mountd failures, but most of that has cleared
up now.
--
John
______________________________________________________
Customer Service Sofware Workshop Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] "TheBook.Com" (TM)
315-635-1968, x-211 http://www.thebook.com/
------------------------------
From: kite@NoSpam.%inetport.com (Clifford Kite)
Subject: Re: Routing IPX through PPP
Date: 22 May 1999 10:17:08 -0500
Carl Filpo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
: Any info/references/docs/tips on how to set this up would be appreciated.
: - Routing between the 2 ppp links ??
: - Getting IPX through to the local network
: - PPP server
http://www.tartu.customs.ee/linux.index.shtml
--
Clifford Kite <kite@inet%port.com> Not a guru. (tm)
/* Microsoft is a great marketing organization.
* It _has_ to be */
------------------------------
From: "Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 03:15:56 +1000
<snip>
>24.4.162.173 192.168.0.18 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0
eth1
You have a gateway here !!! UGH
>192.168.0.18 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth1
>192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
>192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth1
>127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
>0.0.0.0 24.4.162.173 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth1
Also Here !!! UG
???????????
My machine
>24.4.162.173 192.168.0.18 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth1
>192.168.0.18 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0
eth1
>192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth0
>192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
eth1
>127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo
>0.0.0.0 24.4.162.173 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
eth1
using your examples
No G on the first line
Otherwise I think it means you have two default gateways
can't have "TWO" defaults
Tony
------------------------------
From: "Tony" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 03:11:31 +1000
>As before, the attempt to ping @Home's DNS (IP = 24.4.162.33) just hangs.
>Attempting to telnet to the same IP address still gets me this message:
>"Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host"
Can you ping the Cable modem ????
Start at the basics then work your way forward
Ping yourself
ping both lan cards
ping the cable modem
I would also think that you would need to actually Log on with you username
and Password before any routes can be put in place by your provider !!!!
They probably assign the routes for you automatically on login.
Tony
------------------------------
From: Massimo Boninsegni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: networking problem
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 10:33:55 -0700
Curt wrote:
> >
> > 2) If I do ifconfig eth0 this is what I get (with the 3Com card)
> > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:10:4B:BB:5F:A0
> > inet addr:24.0.167.174 Bcast:24.0.167.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> > RX packets:72 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> > TX packets:49 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> > collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> > Interrupt:9 Base address:0xff00
>
> This looks fine to me.
OK.
> >
> > 3) If I do route, or netstat -r, I get
> > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> > 24.0.167.174 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 eth0
>
> You don't really need a route to this host (itself).
> I doubt it is causing problems though.
OK, that's interesting, it's gotta be something new to 2.2-5.X, because
I noticed it myself, that line did not use to be there with RH5.2 (i.e.,
2.0.36). I am not sure whether it creates a problem or not.
>
> > 24.0.167.0. * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> ^
> Why is there a '.' after the address? Is this a copy error? Worth
> checking.
Yes, copy error. I typed the above.
Massimo
--
Massimo Boninsegni
Department of Physics
San Diego State University
http://rainbow.sdsu.edu/~massimob
------------------------------
From: "D. C. & M. V. Sessions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: ipchains: DENY or REJECT
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 10:40:27 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> which is better to DENY or REJECT ??
Our rule is that you REJECT local packets and DENY external
ones. Mainly because the only not-accepted external packets
should be port scans and such, and we are NOT interested in
suggesting that more effort might pay off.
--
| Microsoft: "A reputation for releasing inferior software will make |
| it more difficult for a software vendor to induce customers to pay |
| for new products or new versions of existing products." |
+---------- D. C. & M. V. Sessions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----------+
------------------------------
From: Dmitry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PCMCIA support: recompiling problem
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 12:31:22 -0700
Hello,
I have RedHat6.0 and Xircom RBEM56G-100 Ethernet and Modem
Card. This card is not supported by PCMCIA.
I found on the WEB that there is a possibility to recompile
drivers/net/tulip.c
and to use pcmcia-cs-3.0.10 with commented line
if(sz == 0) break;
I did all like in the pcmcia howto, but after this I didn't
get this card to work, but also loose my previous working
card Mariner.
Could you write what step and in what order should I do
to upgrade pcmcia support and driver?
Thanks.
Dmitry.
------------------------------
From: Nitin Mule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.admin,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.unix.admin
Subject: System shows incorrect localtime.
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 16:51:55 GMT
Hi all,
I get incorrect time on my redhat linux 5.2 system. When I set correct
time using linuconf date/time tool, it stays correct for some time and
then gets screwed again after some time. I set it to correct time
yesterday and now it's one hour ahead of my local time. I guess the
problem is related to daylight savings time? Since I want to
synchronoize time of other hosts on the network with this machine, I
want to maintain accurate time on this machine. How do I configure this
machine to synchronize it's time with other standard time servers (eg.
US military)? I tried to set this using linuxconf date/time tool, but it
doesn't seem to be working correctly.
[nitin@fileserver nitin]$ date
Sat May 22 13:50:36 EDT 1999
[nitin@fileserver nitin]$ ls -l /etc/localtime
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 34 May 21 17:59 /etc/localtime ->
/usr/share/zoneinfo/Canada/Eastern
[nitin@fileserver nitin]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/clock
UTC="yes"
ARC=false
TIA,
Nitin.
------------------------------
From: "Steve Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.hardware,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Can't communicate through 2nd NIC
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 12:04:14 -0400 (EST)
Reply-To: "Steve Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 21 May 1999 23:53:51 -0700, Harley Waagmeester wrote:
>IPADDR="24.4.162.173" <-------
>
>You have assigned your internet /cable modem address to your eth1 network card,
>that won't work.
>Give your eth1 card a local ip like you have for the eth0 card.
>I'll give a tough sketch of what needs to happen:
>if you give eth1 an ip address of 192.168.0.13,
>Then you need :
>route add 24.4.162.173 gw 192.168.0.13
>route add default gw 24.4.162.173
>
>I'm probably wrong about the syntax
>Just give the eth1 a local ip address and leave the gateway address as
>24.4.162.173,
>and maybe the startup scripts will set the default route up correctly
>
>I hope someone explains this better, or gives the right numbers to plug into the
>config files :))
>
>The point is that you want a local ip for the eth1 interface card and use that as
>the gateway out
>of the machine, and the default route is a "logical route" that flows through the
>hardware route.
>
>The 24.4.162.173 is the address of the cable modem device
More info:
In my last message I wrote that I changed my config as recommended above,
but saw no difference in behavior (ping/telnet still didn't work.) However
there *is* a difference in the output of tcpdump.
Output with previous config:
============================
# /usr/sbin/tcpdump -i eth1
tcpdump: listening on eth1
15:17:58.005410 arp who-has 128.63.2.53 tell ct52636-a
15:17:58.005529 arp who-has 128.9.0.107 tell ct52636-a
15:17:58.008410 arp who-has 198.41.0.4 tell ct52636-a
15:17:58.026120 arp who-has 128.63.2.53 tell 24.4.162.129
15:17:58.035820 arp who-has 128.9.0.107 tell 24.4.162.129
15:17:58.045582 arp who-has 198.41.0.4 tell 24.4.162.129
15:17:59.005240 arp who-has 198.41.0.4 tell ct52636-a
15:17:59.005254 arp who-has 128.9.0.107 tell ct52636-a
15:17:59.005275 arp who-has 128.63.2.53 tell ct52636-a
15:17:59.025473 arp who-has 198.41.0.4 tell 24.4.162.129
15:17:59.036064 arp who-has 128.9.0.107 tell 24.4.162.129
15:17:59.045111 arp who-has 128.63.2.53 tell 24.4.162.129
15:18:00.005232 arp who-has 128.63.2.53 tell ct52636-a
15:18:00.005242 arp who-has 128.9.0.107 tell ct52636-a
15:18:00.005264 arp who-has 198.41.0.4 tell ct52636-a
15:18:00.027275 arp who-has 128.63.2.53 tell 24.4.162.129
15:18:00.038154 arp who-has 128.9.0.107 tell 24.4.162.129
15:18:00.045851 arp who-has 198.41.0.4 tell 24.4.162.129
15:18:02.005334 arp who-has 128.9.0.107 tell ct52636-a
20 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
With new configuration:
=======================
# /usr/sbin/tcpdump -i eth1
tcpdump: listening on eth1
11:50:49.001747 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:50:50.001746 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:50:53.001844 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:50:54.001733 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:50:55.001739 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:50:56.001900 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:50:57.001739 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:50:58.001734 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:50:59.021801 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:51:00.021729 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:51:01.021733 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:51:04.001822 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:51:05.001742 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:51:06.001733 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:51:07.381810 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:51:08.381734 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
11:51:09.381737 arp who-has 24.4.162.173 tell ct52636-a
17 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
Note that during this output I am not explicly addressing eth1. If may be
just a coincident that the tcpdump has changed, but there you go.
Although there apparently is activity on eth1, the RX seen with ipconfig
are not increment regularly during this activity, though the TX count does
increment. Hmm. This is an example of output:
# /sbin/ipconfig eth1
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:60:97:C8:01:C8
inet addr:192.168.0.18 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:44 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:3014 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
Interrupt:10 Base address:0xe800
Any thoughts?
***** Steve Snyder *****
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (UUXX YY)
Subject: Secondary DNS
Date: Sat, 22 May 1999 16:58:50 GMT
Any body can help to provide information on setting up a 2nd DNS:
how to configure named.boot and named.conf
As I couldn't make my Redhat work.
Many thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.networking) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Networking Digest
******************************
